re: #734 Bagua

It would be a health change in this debate if we could argue and investigate on the basis of facts, and not so quickly resort to ad hominem such as questioning sources of funding. Regardless, it is easily demonstrable that the pro AGW* side has a massive advantage in funding. Go ahead and seek funding for research that would prove a species of toad is benefiting from Global Warming, there will not be a penny, change that to suffering and there is a gravy train.

I’ve never seen a contrary study funded at all. You would think they would at least be willing to do the “check our work” part.