re: #730 Thanos

I don’t need to read minds to come to a conclusion from the facts available. Did you need to read minds or get an admission from the police officers who viciously beat Rodney King to come to the conclusion that race played a major role in the beating? I didn’t.

Until there is a mind-reading device that is constructed, or we get admissions from people, we have to draw from the evidence before us. Did we need a mind-reading device to conclude that statements about monkeys throwing golf balls was meant to have a double racist meaning? I think not.

Mine is a fair conclusion based on what evidence I have seen. Can reasonable minds differ with my conclusion? Sure. Reasonable minds can often differ. But to think that my conclusion is ridiculous or unwarranted because I cannot read the assailants minds is somewhat silly I think.