re: #726 Dianna

Once more, I remind you that I am not a climatologist. And - by your claims (which I cannot prove or disprove) - neither are you.

You supply some interesting links, which I read.

I dispute the apocalyptic language of your posts, not your linkage.

By my claims neither am I? You see this is the kind of thing that gets really old.

My claim about my expertise, is that I work in Chaos and Non-linear Dynamics and that I have the technical background to actually get into the science of climatology. However, this is not about me, as you keep trying to make it.

If you wish to discuss AGW, I really don’t care if you think that I am a first grader.

Look at the science and process it. The predictions that I am making are the ones supported by the evidence and the community. I am not sure why you feel the need to discount them. If you were actually reading the links I provide, you will see that I am not just making this up.

However, again, it is easier to attack me than it is to actually process that the projections are very very bad indeed. Actually look at the science and stop the whining about me.