re: #732 efuseakay
Yet you’re in a loving marriage with the cult of Zimm.
In a trial evidence and presentations will happen that support both sides. I just hope that discussion of evidence from both sides can happen without assumptions of support for GZ.
If I choose to discuss a certain point of evidence (like that bloody nose) and I see that as confirmation of part of GZ’s story am I defending him? No, I’d be discussing evidence at hand. The take I get from Targetpractice is just that. Not a supporter of GZ apart from supporting a fair trial.