re: #737 reine.de.tout

And all of those FACTS would be reported, and people would be left to form their own OPINIONS. There is no need for a reporter to say, “Andrew Snelling is a kook”. Which is an editorial opinion, and one I agree with, but the reporter should not make that implication in his story.

Well, again, if someone writes: “Scientists say that this rock is 3.5 billion y.o., however geologist Dr. Andrew Snelling with 30 years of experience says that the methods used to date this rock are fallacious, and the rock is no older than 6000 y.o.” I would find that an extremely bad reporting.