re: #31 Obdicut

Yeah, Rogue was trying to push this crap one morning— it was the first I’d heard of it. The weird part about using this for denial is that the paper I believe explicilty references that the amount of cosmic rays hitting the earth has not increased over the past few decades, which it would have had to in order for cosmic rays to produce global warming…….

Color me shocked to see you completely misrepresenting my argument especially when I said the CERN CLOUD study does NOT disprove the theory of AGW.

littlegreenfootballs.com

I also said what the study showed was the climate models are wrong and need to be “substantially revised”. I was able to make that crazy leap because that’s what the folks at CERN said:

(PDF)

It is clear that the treatment of aerosol formation in climate models will need to be substantially revised, since all models assume that nucleation is caused by these vapours and water alone.

Before we go through the whole argument, again, lets see if we have agreement on those two assertions. Do you agree that the climate models are wrong and need to be revised or not?