re: #754 iceweasel

That’s right.

It’s disturbing because it’s about pandering to the nirthers amongst their constituents. No other reason to put it forward.

re: #766 Pianobuff

Yup - no doubt it’s pandering. I’m just glad it has no effect on current term.

It’s nominally intended to “stop” Obama from running for reelection.

If this were 1998 (D President, R Congress), this might actually get to the President’s desk. IMO the people who tried to impeach Clinton over a squalid affair have learned nothing from the damage to the country and are entirely willing to try the same garbage again.

The DNC has a talking point for 2010 here. More serious is what this, together with BDS, implies about the stability of the country.