re: #72 Islamo-Masonic Conspirator

Sure, but this, again, has nothing to do with my objection to WZ’s incorrect mantra, which concerns the state of evidence, rather than what can be done with the evidence.

“suppressing” was perhaps not the best term, but it seems that they intentionally failed to be to be prompt and thorough in collecting evidence and testimony and assuring that it could not be contested.

As if they had some interest in the case failing…

(now why would they do a thing like that?)