re: #77 Walter L. Newton

[…]

This is not a pro or anti AGW stance on my part, I am only talking about data collection and data analysts methods, and so far I see a big problem on how it has been handled at CRU.

I don’t think the pro or anti is even relevant. Beliefs and opinions are secondary to cold science which is based upon data and accuracy. The relevant question is quite clear, is the information that has emanated from the CRU Hockey Team valid? Can it be verified? If not, it is not even wrong, it is useless.

It is too early to have a firm opinion either way, but if appearances prove accurate then it appears that the CRU Hockey Team are wearing Green Helmets.