re: #37 Anymouse 🌹

The $130,000 repayment offer by Ms. Daniels is a brilliant PR checkmate.

If she is seeking to have the contract declared void (and that seems to be the remedy she’s seeking from my quick read of the complaint) then any such ruling would have to include an order for repayment of the money. More likely, the argument that the defendants would make is that she’s trying to get out of the contract because she think she can make more by writing a book, producing a parody adult film (ew), or giving interviews. They’ll try to argue that the agreement was valid because even though Trump (or whomever) didn’t sign the document, the parties substantially performed all their duties under the agreement and thus there’s no reason to rule that the contract is void.