re: #843 Dianna

Um.

Let’s back up, here.

TFK invited speculation.

Aside from the word “pity” (which I agree should probably have been dispensed with), there is nothing - bloody well nothing! - in the comment that is out of line.

I wish to point out that I’ve been here even longer than tfk. I remember the days when tfk was then one regarded with hostility.

Can we back off, here?

My best guess: Not likely, but I admire your adamance. And sense of fairness.

I remember TFK’s appearance here, too. Thought he was a braying ass then, still do. But one gets used to pointless car alarms eventually. Occasionally I poke him with a stick. He pokes back. It’s all part of the, um, climate. He’s pumping out CO2 like the rest of us.

Time for Occam’s Sleeping Pill. For me, at least.