re: #66 SteveB4

Not quite. I was the guy who said it was a “nontroversy” in comparison to the passage of the bill itself.

You’re also the guy who said that

“I just think it is beyond ridiculous that we’ve entered such a superficial period in our history, when hurtful language is used to justify sweeping and unpopular governmental power grabs.”
re: #66 SteveB4

Not quite. I was the guy who said it was a “nontroversy” in comparison to the passage of the bill itself.

Fair enough. I still find your sense of taste somewhat lacking the same way I do Stonemason’s.