re: #91 Islamo-Masonic Vourdalak

It’s also about other alleged incidents, which can be more disturbing to some, but it’s still about very small children. I wouldn’t venture to say that there was “nothing” wrong going on, and I’m not saying that even a small child cannot be an abuser in some way in theory. I find this to be a borderline case, but screaming about “sexual abuse” in this context seems to stem more from puritanical view of the world than anything else.

I read a couple of other excerpts. Lena D. likened her behavior to “sexual predator” behavior, but that’s her adult recounting of a childhood event. I’m not going to judge Lena D.’s psychological profile or behavior based on an autobiography. The only reason anyone is squawking about this book now is the National Review shaming article. It’s a mountain made from a molehill.