re: #949 mt3_1234

ok, thanks for the link to the papers
but are these all supporting your main point of “I have read hundreds of peer reviewed papers that firmly argue against AGW”?
which ones have that argument as their main thesis?

in this paper here, which is listed in your link (called Global Warming, oddly enough), they don’t deny the existence of global warming, but that “the anticipated global warming is also [likely] overestimated” (in conclusion section)

If you feel like wasting your time, take a look through those papers. The majority of them do not argue against global warming at all.

This is a very very common tactic of both global warming deniers and creationists — they put together long lists of papers and scientists who they claim support their nonsense. And when you start investigating, you discover that the lists are full of papers that say the exact opposite of what they claim, and scientists who didn’t sign on to the list at all and don’t believe the anti-AGW garbage.

Here’s another of those lists put together by … yes … the Heartland Institute, packed with scientists who were outraged to find their names being used without permission:

desmogblog.com