re: #68 Ben Hur

She’s totally presumed innocents, of course, but so are those you are accusing from scant information, and probably pretty far away of a conspiracy.

The facts are so easy to check. That leads me to believe they are lying. Ed’s readers have also pointed out that the story isn’t true and the loophole doesn’t exist. If he made an error why wouldn’t he correct it. He knows it’s not true but he’s happy to run the story anyways. I’ll say the same for the investigator. He’s not stupid and he almost certainly knows the law. He’s most likely lying to advance an agenda. The fact that he’s accusing a woman who is most likely innocent doesn’t seem to bother him. It’s despicable.