re: #976 Walter L. Newton

As I said above, I don’t know anything about this subject, and I have nothing to add.

So, you are saying that this Dyson is the only scientist in the world that you consider reputable on the subject of AGW, but wrong.

Or are there other reputable scientist that don’t agree with the AGW model you espouse and have a reasonable (but wrong) opinion on the science?

No, I sited two examples that the denier blogosphere commonly likes to talk about.

I am saying that there are tens of thousands of scientists who are convinced by the data. The fact that there are still some holdouts, after all of this time is not nearly he point as much as what has happened in terms of all of the evidence that has come in.

In 1990 there was a lot of room left for debate as to weather or not man was the primary driver of the current cycle. There was maybe a 50/50 split in the community. After nearly 20 more years of looking into this, the split is more like 99.9/.1