Overnight Open Thread
Double helix in the sky tonight
Throw out the hardware
Let’s do it right
— Steely Dan, “Aja”
Double helix in the sky tonight
Throw out the hardware
Let’s do it right
— Steely Dan, “Aja”
2 | BlueCanuck Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:02:04pm |
Thank god, I thought I would never last till this point.
3 | Pianobuff Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:02:32pm |
Who was Donald Fagen's weedman?
Steely Dan smoked some good stuff.
4 | Honorary Yooper Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:03:14pm |
Give her some funked up music, she treats you nice
Feed her some hungry reggae, she'll love you twice
The girls don't seem to care tonight
As long as the mood is right
FM - no static at all
- Steely Dan, "FM"
5 | Killgore Trout Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:05:08pm |
Aja - Steely Dan
7 | Leeav Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:05:29pm |
All the drummers (wannabes too) will recognize this song (off the like-titled album) as one of the pinnacle achievements in Steve Gadd's illustrious career. Every time I listen to that song it sends a percussionist shiver down my spine (in 16th notes). :)
8 | Honorary Yooper Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:05:51pm |
To the flouncers in the last thread,
I don't care anymore
Why you run around
Break away
Just when it
Seems so clear
That it's
Over now
Drink your big black cow
And get out of here
- Steely Dan, "Black Cow"
9 | Honorary Yooper Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:06:48pm |
BTW, good choice, Steely Dan. Very good, and very listenable.
11 | Pianobuff Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:13:49pm |
re: #7 Leeav
All the drummers (wannabes too) will recognize this song (off the like-titled album) as one of the pinnacle achievements in Steve Gadd's illustrious career. Every time I listen to that song it sends a percussionist shiver down my spine (in 16th notes). :)
Who did the guitar work on the song Aja? Was it Baxter? Ritenour? Carlton?
12 | HypnoToad Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:13:52pm |
There is so much crazy in the world now, on the left, on the right,
in government institutions, walking about on the street, driving on the freeways, in conversations, on the media, that I'd feel almost alone without this place. I mostly lurk, but am thankful for the generally reasoned and polite discourse here.
13 | Killgore Trout Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:15:24pm |
re: #2 BlueCanuck
Nice.
Also see: Blind Faith - Presence Of The Lord
I actually visited Hyde Park Because of this clip.
15 | SasquatchOnSteroids Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:16:42pm |
re: #12 HypnoToad
There is so much crazy in the world now, on the left, on the right,
in government institutions, walking about on the street, driving on the freeways, in conversations, on the media, that I'd feel almost alone without this place. I mostly lurk, but am thankful for the generally reasoned and polite discourse here.
Screw you, you Commie Bastard !
///
16 | zombie Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:16:57pm |
One of the issues that really disgusted me about Van Jones which as far as I could tell got ZERO mention in this recent brouhaha was how rabidly anti-Israel he was, to the extent of becoming one of those on-the-scene pro-Palestinian "reporters"/propagandists in the West Bank sent there by the Stalinist radio station KPFA. He also joined in with the frothing maniacs of Students for Justice in Palestine in several "actions," including an infamous one in which they hijacked a Holocaust Remembrance Day and took over the protest site by force and then read kaddish for all the victims of the the murderous Jews.
I witnessed myself that second incident, shortly before I made the conversion to the zombie persona. In fact, it was one of the things that pushed me away from moonbathood.
Much of his vicious anti-Israel (borderline anti-Semitic, it seemed to me) beliefs are now forgotten, but there is some remaining evidence.
For example, there's this page at Indy Media with a transcript of one of his broadcasts from Palestine:
(Indy media redirects LGF links: here's the URL w/spaces for pasting: )
http:// www. indybay .org/newsitems/2002/12/30/15558891.php
20:27 Dennis: now w Van Jones of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights in San Francisco.. Van: I came to the holy land to get a view of the human rights situation.. I was totally unprepared.. THE WORST RACIAL PRACTICES OF THE LAST CENTURY ARE PRESENT HERE, IN SHOCKING COMBINATION.. Arab citizens under a pass situation like apartheid.. about the harrassment of an Arab American in our group at the airport.. people in the US don't have a clear view of what is going on.. like 'settlements'.. 30,000 people in massive cities, with Burger Kings and malls, and defended with the whole might of the Israeli army.. wholesale demolition of Palestinian homes.. the US supporting the whole mess.. to see it.. to see what it means for Arab people is really really distressing.. Dennis: US media shows Israel backed into a corner.. Van: I came over here very concerned about Israeli children living in fear.. nobody is winning here.. WHAT I'VE SEEN HERE GOES FAR BEYOND WHAT COULD BE CONSIDERED FOR SAFETY.. ABSOLUTE HOUSE ARREST FOR EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN A CITY.. 24/7 FOR WEEKS AT A TIME.. NONE OF THIS COULD RATIONALLY BE CONCEIVED OF AS DEFENCE.. I HAVE BEEN A LIFELONG OPPONENT OF ANTI-SEMITISM.. NOW NOT TO SPEAK OUT HERE IS ANTI-SEMITIC.. WE OWE IT TO THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL.. AND PALESTINE.. TO PUT AN END TO THESE KIND OF ABUSES.. THERE IS NO DIVISION BETWEEN US POLICY TOWARD IRAQ AND TOWARD ISRAEL-PALESTINE.. THE US GOVERNMENT ON THE WRONG SIDE OF SANITY.. to push Iraq into a corner and threaten it with massive war.. we need new leadership in Tel Aviv and Washington.
(The one I heard on the radio seemed much worse, however.)
There was one sympathetic account of the SJP incident where Van Jones helped to usurp Holocaust Remembrance Day:
The Israel supporters seemed merely scornful of the Palestinian speakers; it took one of their own to infuriate them. When Micah Beazant, a young Jewish kid with a skinny build and a tremulous voice, spoke of his family's Holocaust casualties, decried the practice of labeling anti-Zionist critics "self-hating Jews," and recited the Kaddish prayer for dead Palestinians, the Zionists began screaming. "Shame on you!" "Sacrilege!" "The next Holocaust is gonna be because of you!"Van Jones, the celebrity lawyer for the Bay Area radical left, soon got into an argument with one of the hecklers. "You're interrupting prayers," he scolded. "You make yourselves look very bad."
"This is our day of remembrance, and you're demeaning all of us," the heckler retorted. "Why pick this day?"
I've never seen a report on this infamous day from the pro-Israel side, but from what I witnessed, it was stomach-churning.
17 | Dancing along the light of day Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:19:02pm |
re: #10 Racer X
God Bless the firefighters.
18 | Pianobuff Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:19:54pm |
Recent activity from Justin's father (shitmydadsays):
"Everybody loves that Da Vinci code book. Bullshit, it sucks. I read it. It's for all the dummies."
"I'm having a Makers Mark, you want one? What? 7up? I ain't mixing fucking makers with 7up. Might as well put a lil' fucking umbrella in it"
“You touched that god damned biscuit. Bullshit, I saw you touch it….I don’t give a shit about your evidence, this isn’t a court of law."
"It's just a fucking june bug, calm down. Jesus Christ, what happens when something bigger than a testicle attacks you?" (My fav of the batch)
"What are you listening to?...I know who Hall & Oates are god dammit. It's the mustache guy and the gay man."
"I just did an hour on the gym machine. I'm sweaty and I have to shit. Where's my fannypack, this workout is over."
19 | Mostly sane, most of the time. Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:22:31pm |
Just got back from the most miserable huckleberrying trip I have ever been on. Rained, but we can't come back next weekend, so we stuck it out and now we have 3 quarts of huckleberries, the food of the gods.
Just throwing this out to see if anyone else is a huckleberry fan.
21 | zombie Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:24:22pm |
Sorry for the double-post at comment #16 above with previous dead thread. Accidentally pasted it in twice.
22 | victor_yugo Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:25:37pm |
23 | SurferDoc Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:25:52pm |
re: #19 EmmmieG
Just got back from the most miserable huckleberrying trip I have ever been on. Rained, but we can't come back next weekend, so we stuck it out and now we have 3 quarts of huckleberries, the food of the gods.
Just throwing this out to see if anyone else is a huckleberry fan.
I'm your huckleberry
/couldn't resist
24 | BlueCanuck Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:26:25pm |
Hmmm, when it rains it pours. bbiab, other things happening.
BTW KT, great song and sound.
25 | HypnoToad Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:26:41pm |
Awesome view now from the Mt. Wilson towercam of the station fire. Notice the ash on the 100" dome. Lucky me might get to help clean it up in a few weeks.Your text to link...
26 | StudSupreme Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:27:55pm |
I have a feeling that within the next 6 months, 90% of the people who voted for Obama will have real difficulties looking in the mirror every morning...
27 | tradewind Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:27:59pm |
Traveling music for Jones?
Nah, actually I just like the song...and the name of the group. State Radio.
28 | Van Helsing Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:28:44pm |
29 | tradewind Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:29:26pm |
re: #19 EmmmieG
Marionberries!
Got a bunch of them on a trip to Oregon last month. Like the best blackberries ever, only ginormous.
30 | Mostly sane, most of the time. Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:29:49pm |
re: #23 SurferDoc
Just for the record, I had a bet going with myself about whether Doc Holliday or Huckleberry Hound would pop up first
Holliday wins.
31 | Mostly sane, most of the time. Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:30:36pm |
re: #29 tradewind
Marionberries!
Got a bunch of them on a trip to Oregon last month. Like the best blackberries ever, only ginormous.
Yes, but you can buy Marionberries (which, for the non-Oregonized of you, are named after Marion county) at the farmer's market. Huckleberries you have to go find.
32 | SurferDoc Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:32:55pm |
re: #30 EmmmieG
Just for the record, I had a bet going with myself about whether Doc Holliday or Huckleberry Hound would pop up first
Holliday wins.
He usually did.
33 | Van Helsing Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:32:57pm |
re: #26 StudSupreme
I have a feeling that within the next 6 months, 90% of the people who voted for Obama will have real difficulties looking in the mirror every morning...
You may be underestimating the human organisms' tolerance for cognitive dissonance.
34 | FamHistoryGuy Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:33:09pm |
re: #25 HypnoToad
Have them clean the video cam glass also. Lots of speckles on it. Noticeable on the night shots.
35 | tradewind Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:33:53pm |
re: #31 EmmmieG
Well, considering the bees, the hot sun, and the birds squawking at us as we picked 'em, I wish I had known. Would'a bought 'em.
But it was a fun day anyhow. We bought some huckleberry jam that the pick 'em farm sold.
36 | Silvergirl Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:34:34pm |
re: #28 Van Helsing
I don't think anyone will hound you for it.
My favorite was Auggie Doggie and Doggie Daddy. Dogs Playing Poker with cartoon dogs.
37 | Mostly sane, most of the time. Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:34:58pm |
re: #35 tradewind
Well, considering the bees, the hot sun, and the birds squawking at us as we picked 'em, I wish I had known. Would'a bought 'em.
But it was a fun day anyhow. We bought some huckleberry jam that the pick 'em farm sold.
At my local farmer's market, you can buy really big blackberries and marion berries. You can even get a mixed flat.
38 | tradewind Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:35:51pm |
re: #26 StudSupreme
Probably most of them are totally unaware that there's any controversy surrounding his coterie.
39 | Mostly sane, most of the time. Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:35:54pm |
re: #36 Silvergirl
Sure, yeah, everything was going fine, and then Dogbert walked into the room, his little tail wagging.
40 | Racer X Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:36:09pm |
re: #25 HypnoToad
Awesome view now from the Mt. Wilson towercam of the station fire. Notice the ash on the 100" dome. Lucky me might get to help clean it up in a few weeks.Your text to link...
Compare that image to this one.
41 | tradewind Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:37:13pm |
re: #37 EmmmieG
We picked them, and I had to admit I couldn't believe how cheap berries are when you pick them yourself. Raspberries, marions, and blueberries.
I guess most of the cost must be labor.
43 | Van Helsing Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:37:37pm |
re: #36 Silvergirl
My favorite was Auggie Doggie and Doggie Daddy. Dogs Playing Poker with cartoon dogs.
Fond memories of those, too. Muttley was great.
44 | Silvergirl Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:38:43pm |
45 | Mostly sane, most of the time. Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:39:17pm |
re: #41 tradewind
We picked them, and I had to admit I couldn't believe how cheap berries are when you pick them yourself. Raspberries, marions, and blueberries.
I guess most of the cost must be labor.
Well, the cost of huckleberries is the gas to get to them, but strawberries are a bargain. I missed blueberry season this year because the best time (for me) to pick was during some 100 plus days. No dice. We just eat marions and raspberries, so I just buy them a few pints at a time.
46 | astronmr20 Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:39:36pm |
Regardless of why and how Van Jones resigned, I am wondering how long it will take him to make some completely un-hinged comments.
47 | MrPaulRevere Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:41:28pm |
Sharmuta, you and I have interacted on a friendly basis for quite a while. Come what may, those will always be fond memories to me, we had a lot of good times and conversations; we were very honest at times with one another. In that spirit I have to tell you I find this campaign against Zombie which apparently you have joined to be profoundly disturbing.
48 | slokat Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:43:36pm |
OT: for you all watching the fires in So Cal - one of the firefighters on the Jesusita Fire is also one of the best distance runners coming out of high school in California this year. His summer job is being on fire crew, he'z supposed to start at Cal Poly this Fall.
49 | tradewind Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:45:03pm |
Van Jones, the celebrity lawyer for the Bay Area radical left,
Shouldn't that have been a major clue stick for Obama's vetters right there?
50 | Dancing along the light of day Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:45:07pm |
re: #44 Silvergirl
He DID snicker rather well!
51 | HypnoToad Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:45:22pm |
52 | Dancing along the light of day Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:46:05pm |
re: #48 slokat
Yeah! Thanks for the info!
53 | Mostly sane, most of the time. Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:46:37pm |
The Princess got home from her festivities. I can go to bed now.
Sweet dreams!
54 | TheMatrix31 Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:48:12pm |
re: #49 tradewind
Shouldn't that have been a major clue stick for Obama's vetters right there?
You would think.
55 | Sharmuta Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:48:12pm |
re: #47 MrPaulRevere
You should be disturbed, but it's not because of me, my friend.
56 | tradewind Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:51:34pm |
re: #54 TheMatrix31
I just now realized that Jones co-founded Color of Change...
So regardless of Beck's couth or lack of it, at least I understand part of the reason why he went after him so hard.
' It wasn't personal, it was just bidness ', as Tony Soprano would say.
57 | shiplord kirel Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:53:13pm |
Perhaps the biggest problem with Van Jones, that he is a pseudoscience whack-job affiliated with the batshit crazy Institute for Noetic Sciences, will go unnoticed as he stacks up the usual lecture/book fortune portraying himself as a victim of right-wing persecution.
58 | Sharmuta Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:53:59pm |
Take for example the comment above. Racer X asked why I dinged it down on the thread below (and I downdinged it here too), so I told him:
I don't see why a young Jewish boy getting attacked for his position by being told things like:
"The next Holocaust is gonna be because of you!"
should be less stomach churning than Van Jones defending the kid.
If you'd like to know more, Archie, I can bring an avalanche.
59 | Fenway_Nation Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:58:27pm |
re: #49 tradewind
Shouldn't that have been a major clue stick for Obama's vetters right there?
More like a resume enhancer...
60 | Sharmuta Sat, Sep 5, 2009 11:59:49pm |
re: #47 MrPaulRevere
I also updinged you for your honesty with me. I appreciate that. And I will continue to deal honestly with you because I've always respected you, and I have nothing to hide.
61 | zombie Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:05:20am |
re: #58 Sharmuta
As I mentioned, that published report of the 2002 incident was overly sympathetic to the Palestinian side. The vituperativeness and barely-suppressed violence of what went that day still haunts me -- it felt like almost like a revolution. Jewish students were trembling afterward. Unbelievable things were said and epithets were hurls from the SJP side toward to the Jews which were not in that report. It is an infamous incident. That one comment from a pro-Israel student focused on in the article was perhaps over-heated, but the whole atmosphere felt like a pogrom was brewing. This sense was not conveyed by the reporter. It was extremely stomach-churning.
62 | MrPaulRevere Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:07:38am |
re: #60 Sharmuta
Thanks, honesty is the key indeed. I have noticed over the past 6 weeks or so a disciplined campaign to discredit Zombie personally and his/her work generally. Yeah, I have a massive problem with that.
63 | tradewind Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:08:36am |
re: #59 Fenway_Nation
Sucks for us.
Oh well, elections do have consequences.
64 | BARACK THE VOTE Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:08:41am |
re: #47 MrPaulRevere
Sharmuta, you and I have interacted on a friendly basis for quite a while. Come what may, those will always be fond memories to me, we had a lot of good times and conversations; we were very honest at times with one another. In that spirit I have to tell you I find this campaign against Zombie which apparently you have joined to be profoundly disturbing.
What campaign? Criticism or disagreement does not a 'campaign' make.
Some would say that the absence of criticism or a prohibition on it makes for an echo chamber. Hardly LGF's style.
65 | Killian Bundy Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:10:18am |
66 | Syrah Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:11:37am |
Hi Sharm.
I am late, but I have something up on the Conflict of Visions book thread.
Seems that I missed some excitement on the main threads while I was away.
68 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:13:09am |
69 | freetoken Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:13:12am |
A candidate for the spin-offs:
WHY are men’s muscles so much bigger than women’s? Partly, of course, because men do the fighting and hunting. But also, perhaps, because women like men who can do these things well, and are thus attracted to muscular men. Both phenomena—competing with members of the same sex and showing off to members of the opposite—are subject to a form of evolution known as sexual selection.
...
The main characteristic of sexually selected features is that they are expensive to maintain. Since, whether competing or attracting, only the best will do, resources get piled into them, almost regardless of the consequences. In a study just published in Evolution and Human Behavior, Dr Lassek and Dr Gaulin show that this crucial characteristic is true for men’s muscles.
Their data came from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which followed 12,000 American men and women over the course of six years. They found that men require 50% more calories than women do, even after adjusting for activity levels, and that their muscle mass is the strongest predictor of their intake of calories—stronger than their occupation or their body-mass index (a measure of obesity). And there is another cost to being muscly: men’s immune systems are less effective than those of women (which was known before), and become worse the more muscular the men are (which was not).
The benefits, however, were there, as well. The more muscular a man, the more sexual partners he reported, both in the past year and over his lifetime, and the earlier his first sexual experience was likely to have been. This may, in part, be a result of the ability of muscular men to intimidate 97lb weaklings. But in a society where extreme forms of such intimidation are curbed by law, female choice seems as likely an explanation—especially as previous studies have confirmed scientifically the everyday observation that women do indeed prefer men with big biceps and triangular torsos.
...
70 | tradewind Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:14:35am |
re: #65 Killian Bundy
Maybe they're looking at this first year as ' run it up the flagpole and see who salutes'/ how much can we get away with. Or they just vastly overestimated the amount of political capital in the TOTUS account.
72 | Fenway_Nation Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:17:27am |
re: #70 tradewind
Maybe they're looking at this first year as ' run it up the flagpole and see who salutes'/ how much can we get away with. Or they just vastly overestimated the amount of political capital in the TOTUS account.
How would that be any different than the real capital in Social Security, Medicaid, the Post Office or other almost-broke gov't programs and agencies that they overestimated?
73 | Charles Johnson Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:17:39am |
I see some referrals from Ace of Spades to the resignation thread; I just don't care any more to even read his bullshit. He's burned his last bridge with me.
74 | Killian Bundy Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:17:47am |
re: #68 TheMatrix31
Shocking.
Not really, they're not stupid. Van Jones didn't just accidentally end up on the White House staff.
/these are the type of people they're looking to recruit
75 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:22:44am |
re: #74 Killian Bundy
Not really, they're not stupid. Van Jones didn't just accidentally end up on the White House staff.
/these are the type of people they're looking to recruit
I know, I forgot the sarcasm tag lol.
76 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:22:47am |
You know what's really depressing? Not being able to tell the difference between someone who is having a drunken, nervous breakdown, and a violent schizophrenic who will stab you in the neck with a petrified piece of Kentucky Fried Chicken the moment you utter the first syllable of the word "purple".
Damn. That shit smarts.
77 | mikeymom Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:24:50am |
OT and im really embarrased to ask this- i am computer challenged--i need to find an email for a relative- i have a snail mail address-where do i find him?
78 | SanFranciscoZionist Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:24:51am |
re: #19 EmmmieG
Just got back from the most miserable huckleberrying trip I have ever been on. Rained, but we can't come back next weekend, so we stuck it out and now we have 3 quarts of huckleberries, the food of the gods.
Just throwing this out to see if anyone else is a huckleberry fan.
I don't believe I have ever even seen a huckleberry. What do they look like?
79 | Killian Bundy Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:26:26am |
President Hamid Karzai takes 100% of votes in opposition stronghold
In the southern Afghan district of Shorabak, the tribesmen gathered shortly before last month’s presidential election to discuss which candidate they would back. After a debate they chose to endorse Abdullah Abdullah, President Hamid Karzai’s leading opponent.
The tribal leaders prepared to deliver a landslide for Abdullah – but it never happened. They claim Ahmed Wali Karzai, the president’s brother and leader of the Kandahar provincial council, detained the local governor and closed all the district’s 46 polling sites on election day.
The ballot boxes were taken back to the district headquarters where, tribal leaders allege, they were stuffed with ballots by local policemen. A total of 23,900 ballots were finally sent off to Kabul, the capital – every one of them a vote for Karzai.
The alleged fraud, which Ahmed Wali Karzai denies, was the most blatant example among hundreds of incidents that have threatened to make a mockery of the election.
/just great, we're fighting and dying so they can hold elections and this is the thanks we get
80 | zombie Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:27:12am |
re: #78 SanFranciscoZionist
I don't believe I have ever even seen a huckleberry. What do they look like?
You need a huckleberry friend to tell you that!
81 | SanFranciscoZionist Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:27:30am |
re: #37 EmmmieG
At my local farmer's market, you can buy really big blackberries and marion berries. You can even get a mixed flat.
I used to pick salmonberries when we went camping when I was kid. Good stuff.
83 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:28:56am |
re: #73 Charles
I see some referrals from Ace of Spades to the resignation thread; I just don't care any more to even read his bullshit. He's burned his last bridge with me.
Read a lot like the stalker site including the complete lack of substance. I see Rawmuse is in there with that bunch.
84 | Silvergirl Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:29:01am |
87 | Bagua Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:31:19am |
re: #76 Slumbering Behemoth
You know what's really depressing? Not being able to tell the difference between someone who is having a drunken, nervous breakdown, and a violent schizophrenic who will stab you in the neck with a petrified piece of Kentucky Fried Chicken the moment you utter the first syllable of the word "purple".
Damn. That shit smarts.
I hate it when that happens, you don't know who trust.
88 | mikeymom Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:31:28am |
memories-50 yrs ago-when my daddy went fishing and took me with him alonf the hudson river - i picked blackberries--i miss my dad and ny
89 | Dancing along the light of day Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:33:46am |
re: #69 freetoken
LOL!
I read that in "The Economist" earlier today. Enjoyed the Vladimir Putin picture that went along with it.
91 | Dancing along the light of day Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:36:44am |
re: #77 mikeymom
Try Googling the name. The snail mail & the email aren't related at all. Google is your best bet. Or, silly, the telephone? ;)
92 | mikeymom Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:36:52am |
93 | BARACK THE VOTE Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:36:54am |
re: #83 Gus 802
Read a lot like the stalker site including the complete lack of substance. I see Rawmuse is in there with that bunch.
Ace o'Spades really ought to just be called Piece O'Shit.
94 | freetoken Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:37:05am |
re: #89 Floral Giraffe
I figure there had to be a reason I go to the gym several times a week.
I must confess though... the opposite gender seemed most attracted to me when I was at my thinnest (and thin I was, for dancing).
95 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:41:28am |
re: #92 mikeymom
IIrc, one scene in picnic, the girls and boys showers are next to each other and a girl is trying to watch William Holden shower until her friends pull her away. Old memory, might not be accurate.:)
96 | mikeymom Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:45:35am |
re: #95 BatGuano
hmm--i recall that when he wasm hiding from police, he was hiding under a waterfall
97 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:45:53am |
re: #93 iceweasel
Ice, a proper young lady calls it POS. Decorum,decorum toujours, decorum. :)
98 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:46:50am |
re: #87 Bagua
I hate it when that happens, you don't know who trust.
Certainly not those Shar Pei. You know they work for the ChiComs, right?
In homes all across America, they arf assessing the levels of dried goods and plastic containers possessed by gawt-fearing patriots, and reporting back to their pinko masters.
Wake up! Hide your Cheerios and Zip-Loc baggies. This is serious business!
99 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:47:51am |
re: #96 mikeymom
You are probably right. It has been a few years since I have seen it. 37 is a few years isn't it?. ;
100 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:49:23am |
re: #97 BatGuano
Ice, a proper young lady calls it POS. Decorum,decorum toujours, decorum. :)
You assume too much! With Ice it remains l'audace, l'audace, toujours l'audace!
Hopefully, she fares better than Danton did...
;-)
101 | mikeymom Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:49:54am |
re: #95 BatGuano
the reason i love that movie is--in real life, i sort of did the same thing. my parents gave me an ultimatum--here i am 42 yrs later with mikeydad--
102 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:50:57am |
re: #93 iceweasel
Ace o'Spades really ought to just be called Piece O'Shit.
As usual they're not discussing the issue. Lack of understanding, no eye for nuance, ramifications, etc. Instead it's largely focused on LGF. You think they would at least be applauding this resignation but I'm sure that's just of a reflection of a state of chronic anger.
I don't think one can even call it anti-intellectual. With anti-intellectualism one has to at least have a slight grasp of basic intellectual tasks.
103 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:54:04am |
re: #102 Gus 802
It's pure rage. Ace-hole is likely starved for traffic and a Charles Derangement Syndrome thread or two or seven can really bring a bump. It's sad. A psychologist could make a case study of this pathetic phenomenon.
104 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:54:29am |
re: #100 austin_blue
I was thing more of the Frederick the Great quote. I know she will fare better than Danton!
106 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:55:52am |
re: #102 Gus 802
As usual they're not discussing the issue. Lack of understanding, no eye for nuance, ramifications, etc. Instead it's largely focused on LGF. You think they would at least be applauding this resignation but I'm sure that's just of a reflection of a state of chronic anger.
I don't think one can even call it anti-intellectual. With anti-intellectualism one has to at least have a slight grasp of basic intellectual tasks.
Why should one applaud the resignation? Look, I don't care what his past was. I believe that people can grow up and change. If past or present Liberal leanings were enough to disqualify you from this board, it would be a lonely place. And that is a *good* thing.
Was he good at his job? Did he provide value for the taxpayer's dollar? What else should matter? Those are the only metrics I care about. Performance.
107 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:57:21am |
re: #103 Sharmuta
It's pure rage. Ace-hole is likely starved for traffic and a Charles Derangement Syndrome thread or two or seven can really bring a bump. It's sad. A psychologist could make a case study of this pathetic phenomenon.
Right. It's a pathology that reads a lot like an obsession. Perhaps it's also mixed in with a form of postpartum? That might not be the right word.
108 | FamHistoryGuy Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:58:01am |
re: #106 austin_blue
So you think his belief systems will not inform his performance and his leadership?
109 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:58:20am |
re: #104 BatGuano
I was thing more of the Frederick the Great quote. I know she will fare better than Danton!
Actually, it was Danton's quote. Everyone "knows" it was Frederick the Great's quote because of Patton, but it was misattributed.
110 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:59:02am |
re: #106 austin_blue
Why should one applaud the resignation? Look, I don't care what his past was. I believe that people can grow up and change. If past or present Liberal leanings were enough to disqualify you from this board, it would be a lonely place. And that is a *good* thing.
Was he good at his job? Did he provide value for the taxpayer's dollar? What else should matter? Those are the only metrics I care about. Performance.
That they would applaud it. Which they seemingly were or at least that was the objective of their post. I'm said that seeing it from within the context of that group.
111 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 12:59:46am |
re: #110 Gus 802
That they would applaud it. Which they seemingly were or at least that was the objective of their post. I
I'msaid that seeing it from within the context of that group.
PIMF
112 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:00:19am |
re: #107 Gus 802
Right. It's a pathology that reads a lot like an obsession. Perhaps it's also mixed in with a form of postpartum? That might not be the right word.
Paranoid personality disorder.
113 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:01:17am |
Wow.. just popped over to Ace to see what's been going on. What acidic, ignorant hatred... against Charles, LGF, and common sense.
Ace needs to clean that shit up.
115 | Dancing along the light of day Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:03:18am |
re: #113 astronmr20
I'm a LUCKY internet newbie. Stumbeled upon LGF & can't handle anything less. AoS was just a PIT, IMHO. Sludge, would be putting it nicely.
116 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:04:12am |
re: #109 austin_blue
I stand corrected. Thank you! I try hard not to get my history from popular culture. :)
117 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:05:06am |
re: #112 Sharmuta
Paranoid personality disorder.
Right. Bullying personalities as well. Saw two racist comments fly by in the thread in question which resulted in two of several bans. Much deserved.
118 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:07:38am |
It's an odd phenomenon that LGF, the tiny few people who hang here, and the horribly diminishing numbers of people visiting here every day...
*cough*
At 1:02 AM, Pacific Time.
Now Online: 1,205
Logged in: 134
Today
Page Views: 15,140
Visits: 8,470
Yesterday
Page Views: 99,120
Visits: 69,790
*cough*
...are all so insignificant as to be mentioned so many times, by so many different politically minded factions, everyday, and with so many amounts of hatred and love.
Truly, Charles is a failure as a bloghost, and LGF is a failure as a blog.
///
119 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:07:52am |
re: #114 Sharmuta
He's encouraging it.
Well, at risk of lowering the discourse, he's a frikking idiot. Reading the comments and it's idiocy such as,
"Charles Johnson weeps!"
"Take that Charles!"
...and other "personal" attacks against LGF members.
It's as if NONE of them actually read what Charles wrote, or even have half a brain.
//sorry for dragging it all up, but it's disappointing. I used to visit that place frequently a few years ago and haven't really been back in some time. Seems to be a place where ex-LFG members congregate to bash Charles and work themselves up into a frenzy of stupid.
In other words, it's a place for internet losers.
Yup.. won't be going back there anytime soon.
120 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:09:29am |
re: #108 FamHistoryGuy
So you think his belief systems will not inform his performance and his leadership?
Which one? The one he previously held or the one he has today? Reagan in his youth was very Liberal. Again, as I stated, the barkers give no shrift that a person can change, grow, or mature. Would you have a litmus test on membership on this board?
Again, if you want to run government as a business, you must judge an employee on merit. Why is that difficult?
Did you have a problem with Marvin Olansky in the first Bush campaign, a former radical commie? The man whose theory of Compassionate Conservatism was embraced by Rove as the only way Bush could win in a country where the budget was balanced (a surplus!), we were at peace, and everyone was moderately happy? Compassionate Conservatism made Bush all warm and fuzzy. A uniter, not a divider.
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
121 | Shiplord Kirel Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:10:37am |
re: #116 BatGuano
I stand corrected. Thank you! I try hard not to get my history from popular culture. :)
You're gonna have to answer to the Coca-Cola Company for that...
122 | Shiplord Kirel Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:11:16am |
I love The Bomb but it's a Strange Love.
123 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:11:20am |
re: #119 astronmr20
Yeah- CDS doesn't seem to be a real winning business model.
124 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:12:32am |
125 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:12:54am |
re: #121 Shiplord Kirel
It's okay, I'm heavily armed. As long as I don't get spritzed in the face with coke.
126 | FamHistoryGuy Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:13:08am |
re: #120 austin_blue
And how is his position different now from then? How has his positions changed? Has he publicly spoken of any changes?
127 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:15:10am |
They are melting down over the Jones "resignation" at Kos. Hilarious:
Obama and everyone in his administration have spines of jello.
He couldn't stand behind his words and caved. That's being a fucking coward.
So if we make every last effort and at last succeed, we get Republican APPROVAL?! Oh joy. Let's skip health care altogether if we get that. Maybe Christmas too.
/
129 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:16:46am |
More great stuff from KosKidz over jones:
we thought we were getting something fresh, intelligent and new when Obama came in. I have to admit, I also feel defeated with this resignation. I also hope I buck up soon, but either I don't understand Obama's MOA, or something. Maybe he is weak, on a slow learning curve, maybe he will surprise us in all those wonderful ways. I don't know anymore, and the bitterness I am hearing in these comments I can understand.
133 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:27:17am |
re: #129 astronmr20
More great stuff from KosKidz over jones:
That was bound to happen. People will resign and there's nothing that can stop that: you can't stop someone from quitting. Technically he's just a deputy adviser so it's not like a full blown member of the administration. The more progressive members of the party won't be happy about it but resignations have happened before and while this may have been the result of a circus like atmosphere it's not the end of the world for the Democrats nor does it mean that the Republicans have much power to wield because they don't.
135 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:28:42am |
136 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:28:49am |
137 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:29:58am |
re: #126 FamHistoryGuy
And how is his position different now from then? How has his positions changed? Has he publicly spoken of any changes?
Aargh! That's the point!
I don't know. You don't know. He was persecuted based on past positions, which may or may not have been relevant today. Did you hold Reagan's past liberalism against him in 1980? Of course not. Did Bush repudiate Olansky's position in 2000 because of his past positions? Of course not. It got him elected.
This witch-hunting is based on the past. Why not judge an employee on their effectiveness in their jobs? Isn't that what you judge any employee on in the real world? We have entered cloud coo-coo land, where whacks can force the removal of an effective public servant on the basis of their past. Nutso.
138 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:31:29am |
re: #137 austin_blue
Aargh! That's the point!
I don't know. You don't know. He was persecuted based on past positions, which may or may not have been relevant today. Did you hold Reagan's past liberalism against him in 1980? Of course not. Did Bush repudiate Olansky's position in 2000 because of his past positions? Of course not. It got him elected.
This witch-hunting is based on the past. Why not judge an employee on their effectiveness in their jobs? Isn't that what you judge any employee on in the real world? We have entered cloud coo-coo land, where whacks can force the removal of an effective public servant on the basis of their past. Nutso.
I feel like a person's past influences his mindset, opinions, and values. Those usually effect how someone makes decisions, their personality in daily life as well as professional life.
That's just me I guess.
139 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:31:55am |
Some blogs just don't have what it takes to draw large eyeball-numbers. Some bloghosts can't stand the fact LGF does.
Petty bitches, hating the success of others.
If the could use the power of the hatchet to chop all down to their pathetic sizes, they would. Socialists.
140 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:33:19am |
re: #136 TheMatrix31
Just havin' some food; learnin'g about history.
141 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:34:25am |
re: #140 BatGuano
Just havin' some food; learnin'g about history.
I'm contemplating getting up for some cereal but I'm not sure. Maybe some grapes or something. I just had a bit of watermelon which pissed me off since it was so damn seedy.
143 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:35:38am |
re: #138 TheMatrix31
I feel like a person's past influences his mindset, opinions, and values. Those usually effect how someone makes decisions, their personality in daily life as well as professional life.
That's just me I guess.
Of course you do, unless it's someone like Reagan or Olansky who comes over to your side of the aisle. Then you welcome them like prodigal sons and past sins are forgiven. You don't see any cognitive dissonance in this? eally?
144 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:36:53am |
re: #137 austin_blue
If it were the 60's when he was a full-blown communist,that's one thing. This was a few years ago.
The guy was a nutball.
145 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:37:28am |
OK, let's come up with a replacement for "Green Jobs Czar." Ojoe mentioned an architect before. In my mind it would have to be someone like an architect or an engineer with business experience.
146 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:37:35am |
re: #137 austin_blue
Glenn Beck said he claimed to be a communist in the 90's. Is that true?
147 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:39:03am |
re: #143 austin_blue
Of course you do, unless it's someone like Reagan or Olansky who comes over to your side of the aisle. Then you welcome them like prodigal sons and past sins are forgiven. You don't see any cognitive dissonance in this? eally?
...so Van Jones' fringe kook communist anti-whitey positions are the same as Reagan's younger days in Hollywood?
You can't be serious.
148 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:40:20am |
re: #144 astronmr20
If it were the 60's when he was a full-blown communist,that's one thing. This was a few years ago.
The guy was a nutball.
Ah, so now we have time limits? Interesting! Is it ten years? Twenty?
What evidence do you have that he is a nutball today? Oh, that would be none.
Again, why not look at how well they are doing their freaking jobs that they were hired to do?
149 | FamHistoryGuy Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:42:13am |
re: #137 austin_blue
Why did he not defend himself if the posted positions were no longer current? As far as I have seen he has not renounced his prior positions. Obama has stated in his two books that he favored the far left in all his beliefs and his associations. He should have expected a close examination of any people he put in any position.
150 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:42:24am |
re: #143 austin_blue
Of course you do, unless it's someone like Reagan or Olansky who comes over to your side of the aisle. Then you welcome them like prodigal sons and past sins are forgiven. You don't see any cognitive dissonance in this? eally?
I can figure out what's forgivable and what isn't. If Reagan had the past that Jones had, I'd have MASSIVE problems with it.
151 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:42:58am |
152 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:43:42am |
re: #146 BatGuano
Glenn Beck said he claimed to be a communist in the 90's. Is that true?
I have no idea and I don't care. Beck apparently thinks that the Bilderberger's and the Trilateral Commission rule this country. How was his job performance in the position in which he was hired?
153 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:45:32am |
re: #152 austin_blue
Luckily, there wasn't enough time to find out.
I'm not going to trust someone like that with piles of OUR money to figure out "green jobs," which is a dubious term at best.
Would rather focus on the necessity of such a government job to begin with.
154 | redc1c4 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:45:39am |
re: #145 Gus 802
OK, let's come up with a replacement for "Green Jobs Czar." Ojoe mentioned an architect before. In my mind it would have to be someone like an architect or an engineer with business experience.
i've got a better question: why the hell do we need a "green j*bs" anything?
155 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:46:27am |
re: #152 austin_blue
Thanks for the reply. I apologize for asking.
156 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:46:40am |
re: #150 TheMatrix31
I can figure out what's forgivable and what isn't. If Reagan had the past that Jones had, I'd have MASSIVE problems with it.
Can't really compare Reagan with Van Jones. It would have to be an adviser. There's a lot of former communists or socialists that converted on 9/12/2001 so to speak. Similar to Van Jones they might have ascribed to Marxist ideas but they never really went beyond rhetoric.
157 | redc1c4 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:47:04am |
broken water main in the area... water everywhere, even in people's houses
158 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:47:28am |
re: #154 redc1c4
i've got a better question: why the hell do we need a "green j*bs" anything?
I don't think we do however the administration does. They'll find a replacement.
159 | redc1c4 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:48:16am |
re: #156 Gus 802
Can't really compare Reagan with Van Jones. It would have to be an adviser. There's a lot of former communists or socialists that converted on 9/12/2001 so to speak. Similar to Van Jones they might have ascribed to Marxist ideas but they never really went beyond rhetoric.
some of those conversions are questionable, at best.
160 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:48:22am |
re: #154 redc1c4
i've got a better question: why the hell do we need a "green j*bs" anything?
I can think of at least one "green job" I need doing. I am looking to hire someone for the position of planting tu...
Aw, never mind.
161 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:48:55am |
re: #157 redc1c4
Water, water everywhere and all the boards did shrink,
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
162 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:49:20am |
re: #156 Gus 802
Can't really compare Reagan with Van Jones. It would have to be an adviser. There's a lot of former communists or socialists that converted on 9/12/2001 so to speak. Similar to Van Jones they might have ascribed to Marxist ideas but they never really went beyond rhetoric.
I wasn't the one who brought up Reagan's name.
163 | redc1c4 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:49:34am |
re: #158 Gus 802
I don't think we do however the administration does. They'll find a replacement.
well, i predict they will select for ideology, not competence, and the result will be abject failure, unless the only goal is to waste tax money...
164 | Fenway_Nation Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:49:35am |
re: #137 austin_blue
Gosh...I feel so petty and narrow-minded for holding Ted Kennedy's bout of vehicular homicide against him. I mean after all...letting MaryJo suffocate in his Olds was in the past.
Come to think of it, maybe I'm reacting too harshly to radical Islam. I mean all those attacka against New York, London, Madrid, Bali, Moscow, Israel, Mumbai, Buenos Aires, Morroco, the Philippines, Beslan or Nairobi were in the past...maybe I should just let it slide...
//
165 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:49:45am |
166 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:52:02am |
re: #157 redc1c4
Red, sorry I was flippant about it. I didn't mean it. :(
167 | redc1c4 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:52:58am |
re: #166 BatGuano
Red, sorry I was flippant about it. I didn't mean it. :(
no worries here... *my* house isn't flooded. %-)
168 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:53:34am |
re: #148 austin_blue
You seem to misunderstand the term "degree." There is a degree of crazy that Jones jumped into face-first that is miles past any sort of left-leaning that Jones exhibited. It our matches Reagan's. Get it?
Also, you can't equate this to "someone coming over to our side" or not. Jones was still on the "side" he was on 5 years-- being in Obama's admoinistration. That's the point.
This was not about Jones' effectiveness within the administration, it was about Obama being hurt politically by associations with radicals such as Jones. The media ignored this shit during the primary and the election. Obama was emboldened to appoint fringe kooks like Jones. After all, if his friendship and work with Ayers or Rev. Wright couldn't dent him politically, he could appoint his friends with impunity, right? Why not? However, this time it came back to bite him just a bit, and Jones went under the big yellow bus.
Consequently, it was the media's complicity to even scrutinize such things that emboldened this administration to throw any sort of rational vetting process out the window.
169 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:53:49am |
re: #163 redc1c4
well, i predict they will select for ideology, not competence, and the result will be abject failure, unless the only goal is to waste tax money...
No doubt they will. The energy secretary has some good qualifications. I go through this with every president however. It gets to the point where I find myself thinking "they'll change, maybe they'll get it right this time." Only it never happens. It did when the change over in Iraq went to General Petraeus and Gates took over the DoD.
170 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:54:54am |
re: #167 redc1c4
Thanks Red. "Water everywhere" triggered an old memory. I didn't mean to make light of a serious situation.
171 | redc1c4 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:54:59am |
most darkly amusing thing about the water main is that its the trunk that supplies what i like to call "Left LA"... all the liberal whiners over there will be suffering, not me. %-)
172 | redc1c4 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:57:04am |
re: #170 BatGuano
Thanks Red. "Water everywhere" triggered an old memory. I didn't mean to make light of a serious situation.
well, there will be a fair bit of property damage, and major claims against the city, but you'd have to w*rk real hard to drown in this... it's only knee deep in the worst areas
173 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:57:42am |
FWIW, Reagan admitted to being a Democrat and explained why he changed.
174 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:57:52am |
re: #147 astronmr20
...so Van Jones' fringe kook communist anti-whitey positions are the same as Reagan's younger days in Hollywood?
You can't be serious.
Let's parse that shall we?
"fringe kook anti-whitey positions"
Well. That's a substantial statement, isn't it? But if you drill into it it basically distills down to "Van Jones is a racist. He is also insane." Links?
Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
Now, as to comparing it to Reagan, I never made a comparison with Jones to Reagan in the first place. Really. I compared the *acceptance* of Reagan after his change of heart with the inability of the barkers to conceive that Jones' positions *may* be different today than they were earlier in this decade.
And yes, based on that logical, defensible argument, I am deadly serious, and you are legless.
QED and fuckity-bye.
;-)
175 | rightwinger3 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:58:14am |
Howdy, All. Haven't posted in a while. What's goin' on here at LGF? I got lost in Facebook somewhere.
176 | freetoken Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:58:59am |
re: #164 Fenway_Nation
Fenway - dinged you down because you are equating criminal acts or terrorist acts with Van Jone's beliefs, when there has been no criminal, or violent, actions shown in Van Jone's past political activities (that I know of anyway.)
177 | redc1c4 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 1:59:59am |
everybody help yourself:
fruitcup is over there --->
get some before it floats away!
(and keep it away from sources of ignition %-)
178 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:02:42am |
re: #177 redc1c4
Sources of ignition?.'.Ya' know I had kind of a big dinner..:)
179 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:03:03am |
re: #174 austin_blue
Let's parse that shall we?
"fringe kook anti-whitey positions"
Well. That's a substantial statement, isn't it? But if you drill into it it basically distills down to "Van Jones is a racist. He is also insane." Links?
Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
Now, as to comparing it to Reagan, I never made a comparison with Jones to Reagan in the first place. Really. I compared the *acceptance* of Reagan after his change of heart with the inability of the barkers to conceive that Jones' positions *may* be different today than they were earlier in this decade.
And yes, based on that logical, defensible argument, I am deadly serious, and you are legless.
QED and fuckity-bye.
;-)
We could start with his comments about white kids being the only ones instigating shootings in schools, perhaps?
No, it's you who have no leg to stand on. Stop with the straw-man shit. I know what you meant about reagan, and for the third time, it's a matter of degree. Reagan didn't run around bashing Israel and promoting communism.
But I see you don't have the will or the wit to stick around and even learn about Jones or have a discussion. You did the "Bueller?" thing about 2 minutes after my post, then said goodbye.
Troll.
180 | Fenway_Nation Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:03:10am |
re: #176 freetoken
But as austin_blue so eloquently explained, they were in the past, so it's all copasetic Freetoken.
I mean...who am I to damn 0bama for choosing to associate with the likes of vitriolic America-haters like Wright or Ayers...or criminals like Rezko?
I mean...after all, it's in the past.
181 | redc1c4 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:03:54am |
and with that, i'm for the rack.
much more excitement this weekend than i had planned for.
hasta, y'all...
L8r!
182 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:04:48am |
re: #181 redc1c4
and with that, i'm for the rack.
much more excitement this weekend than i had planned for.hasta, y'all...
L8r!
Good night, dude.
183 | redc1c4 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:05:03am |
re: #180 Fenway_Nation
But as austin_blue so eloquently explained, they were in the past, so it's all copasetic Freetoken.
I mean...who am I to damn 0bama for choosing to associate with the likes of vitriolic America-haters like Wright or Ayers...or criminals like Rezko?
I mean...after all, it's in the past.
Fen, enail me if you have a moment... just add "at sbcglobal dot net" to my nick.
185 | Fenway_Nation Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:05:23am |
re: #181 redc1c4
G'nite red- and thanks for the volatile fruitcup.
/Immolation is the sincerest form of flattery.
188 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:06:45am |
re: #176 freetoken
Fenway - dinged you down because you are equating criminal acts or terrorist acts with Van Jone's beliefs, when there has been no criminal, or violent, actions shown in Van Jone's past political activities (that I know of anyway.)
Interesting. Because then whatever allegations against Jones would then be thought crimes. We put aside objections to Marxism and what do we have? A man that merely espoused objectionable ideas. He was never in a position of Marxist authority. He was never a communist mayor of Town-X responsible for a specific legal or illegal act. He never made laws that affected people lives. The position he resigned from didn't even allow that. Hence you can almost say he was convicted because of his ideology or his thoughts.
189 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:09:13am |
re: #177 redc1c4
everybody help yourself:
fruitcup is over there --->
get some before it floats away!
(and keep it away from sources of ignition %-)
Sources of ignition my ass. It should be kept away from sources of cognition. Your brand of fruitcup will make one see things that basic primates were never meant to see.
/which, incidentally, is why I like it
190 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:09:20am |
re: #188 Gus 802
He wasn't "convicted,"
This is politics. When you have such fringe beliefs, there are political consequences. That's all.
A self-described communist had a significant say in how a ginormous pile of our money was going to be spent. Americans won't stand for that and it hurts the "one" politically. Thus, under the bus he goes, I guess.
191 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:10:24am |
re: #164 Fenway_Nation
Gosh...I feel so petty and narrow-minded for holding Ted Kennedy's bout of vehicular homicide against him. I mean after all...letting MaryJo suffocate in his Olds was in the past.
Come to think of it, maybe I'm reacting too harshly to radical Islam. I mean all those attacka against New York, London, Madrid, Bali, Moscow, Israel, Mumbai, Buenos Aires, Morroco, the Philippines, Beslan or Nairobi were in the past...maybe I should just let it slide...
//
That's unfair. Radical Islam is the greatest threat to the Western World and I am totally on board with this country putting every asset available into fighting it. I'd like to start by starving the Magic Kingdom. It all comes back to Saudi Arabia.
And *that* is a completely different discussion.
192 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:13:08am |
By the by, did you ever notice that you can post something as innocuous as, "Ponies are pretty", and get an impassioned argument against ?
/
194 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:14:05am |
re: #192 BatGuano
By the by, did you ever notice that you can post something as innocuous as, "Ponies are pretty", and get an impassioned argument against ?
/
A pony killed my father!! YOU BASTARD!!!
???
195 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:14:07am |
re: #192 BatGuano
By the by, did you ever notice that you can post something as innocuous as, "Ponies are pretty", and get an impassioned argument against ?
/
Fuck ponies.
And penguins, too.
www.fuckyoupenguin.com
197 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:15:02am |
198 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:15:36am |
Ponies are so 2008. Unicorns are the way, man. Get on board.
199 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:15:42am |
Fuck! I killed a pony once! No, I killed him twice and took his kidney!
200 | Drogheda Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:15:48am |
201 | freetoken Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:16:33am |
re: #188 Gus 802
That is part of what is so very disturbing.
Why stop at Van Jones? How many people who work in that office have similar, or otherwise unpopular to the right-o-sphere, opinions on all sorts of topics? Should they be outed too?
Why stop there - heck, let's check all the federal employees. Shall we administer oath tests (to the ideals of the JBS Glenn Beck) for their fitness for employment? After all, what if there is a federal employee somewhere (among the couple of million) who were, gasp, part of a forbidden group on a college campus somewhere!
For all the hand-wringing about Van Jone's offensive (to some) ideology, no one, and I mean no one, has posted an example, even a single one, on how it affected his job. Not a single example of him misallocating funds. Now, there could be some, of course, but there is no evidence to date.
Van Jones did not run for or occupy an elected office.
202 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:17:11am |
re: #190 astronmr20
He wasn't "convicted,"
This is politics. When you have such fringe beliefs, there are political consequences. That's all.
A self-described communist had a significant say in how a ginormous pile of our money was going to be spent. Americans won't stand for that and it hurts the "one" politically. Thus, under the bus he goes, I guess.
OK, I should say first that I'm engaging in an early morning intellectual exercise with a couple of drinks under my belt. It is true that the practical result of Jones might be continued federal spending. However, his status an alleged communist would have no legal bearing.
In other words, even a Marxist is protected by the Constitution. A Marxist can even be elected and hold office while they would still have to follow federal, state and local laws. We might not like it but that's the law. The only case of an elected official that comes close it the Socialist governor of Vermont.
203 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:18:39am |
re: #198 Cannadian Club Akbar
Ponies are so 2008. Unicorns are the way, man. Get on board.
Umm... Double check your BAC, and make sure you're not actually chasing after a flea-bitten glue-mare.
/I made that mistake once. Without pants. :(
205 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:20:05am |
re: #179 astronmr20
We could start with his comments about white kids being the only ones instigating shootings in schools, perhaps?
No, it's you who have no leg to stand on. Stop with the straw-man shit. I know what you meant about reagan, and for the third time, it's a matter of degree. Reagan didn't run around bashing Israel and promoting communism.
But I see you don't have the will or the wit to stick around and even learn about Jones or have a discussion. You did the "Bueller?" thing about 2 minutes after my post, then said goodbye.
Troll.
Oh, dear, I'm a troll? I said Fuckity-bye to your argument. What straw man? What does Israel or Communism have to do with his position today and his job performance in that position? He was forced out by barkers who used a selectively sampled group of statements that may or may not have been taken out of context to insinuate that his present philosophy simply could not have changed over time, as Reagan's and Olansky's did.
This is not political discourse. It is witch hunting. It's unseemly.
206 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:21:11am |
re: #201 freetoken
That is part of what is so very disturbing.
Why stop at Van Jones? How many people who work in that office have similar, or otherwise unpopular to the right-o-sphere, opinions on all sorts of topics? Should they be outed too?
Why stop there - heck, let's check all the federal employees. Shall we administer oath tests (to the ideals of
the JBSGlenn Beck) for their fitness for employment? After all, what if there is a federal employee somewhere (among the couple of million) who were, gasp, part of a forbidden group on a college campus somewhere!For all the hand-wringing about Van Jone's offensive (to some) ideology, no one, and I mean no one, has posted an example, even a single one, on how it affected his job. Not a single example of him misallocating funds. Now, there could be some, of course, but there is no evidence to date.
Van Jones did not run for or occupy an elected office.
Exactly. Then we are talking what? McCarthyism perhaps? Are we going down the road of the John Birch Society? Where in the Constitution (which is so frequently touted) does it state that a government employee or elected official must be a member of a specific party? Nowhere. Furthermore, you can't fire someone for being a communist.
207 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:21:17am |
re: #202 Gus 802
Indeed, but his rights were not infringed upon, as far as I can tell. He held a politically-appointed government job. You can't hate on whitey and bow down to the soviet flag if you want to keep that job.
It's Obama's right to ask him to step down in this case, IMO. In the administration, you serve at the pleasure of the President. If your presence is pulling down the President politically, well, see ya.
208 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:25:29am |
re: #205 austin_blue
It's pointing out the appointment of a politically radical person to a hi-fi government post- a post which gives him a large role in determining where large piles of your money are spent.
While I'm not a Beck fan and I don't see any evidence that Jones was a troother, what's wrong with pointing these things out? Do you not understand why these facts will give Americans pause about Jones, or about Obama?
209 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:26:48am |
re: #207 astronmr20
Indeed, but his rights were not infringed upon, as far as I can tell. He held a politically-appointed government job. You can't hate on whitey and bow down to the soviet flag if you want to keep that job.
It's Obama's right to ask him to step down in this case, IMO. In the administration, you serve at the pleasure of the President. If your presence is pulling down the President politically, well, see ya.
Once again, you are accusing him, as of yesterday, being a communist racist without a single shred of evidence about how he felt about those subjects yesterday.
This doesn't disturb you? This is what the barkers are doing!
210 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:28:34am |
You can be a communist and run for President of the United States but it would be nice if you would let everyone know.
211 | FamHistoryGuy Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:29:35am |
re: #209 austin_blue
It has to do with a pattern of beliefs. It does give those of opposite beliefs the reason to ask questions.
212 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:29:59am |
re: #209 austin_blue
Once again, you are accusing him, as of yesterday, being a communist racist without a single shred of evidence about how he felt about those subjects yesterday.
This doesn't disturb you? This is what the barkers are doing!
He wouldn't have resigned or been fired if everything was bullshit, I don't think.
213 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:30:11am |
re: #207 astronmr20
Indeed, but his rights were not infringed upon, as far as I can tell. He held a politically-appointed government job. You can't hate on whitey and bow down to the soviet flag if you want to keep that job.
It's Obama's right to ask him to step down in this case, IMO. In the administration, you serve at the pleasure of the President. If your presence is pulling down the President politically, well, see ya.
Since he resigned his rights were not infringed upon. The only other argument would be that he was harassed to the point of resignation within the White House. Since in this case it was outside forces that may have caused him to resign. In any case those are hypothetical cases.
214 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:30:34am |
re: #210 BatGuano
You can be a communist and run for President of the United States but it would be nice if you would let everyone know.
Gus Hall always made a point of that.
//
215 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:30:55am |
re: #208 astronmr20
It's pointing out the appointment of a politically radical person to a hi-fi government post- a post which gives him a large role in determining where large piles of your money are spent.
While I'm not a Beck fan and I don't see any evidence that Jones was a troother, what's wrong with pointing these things out? Do you not understand why these facts will give Americans pause about Jones, or about Obama?
Because you assume that he is still politically radical without a single shred of evidence! You deny that he can change as Reagan and Olansky did!
It's like arguing with a dining room table.
216 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:32:54am |
re: #213 Gus 802
Since he resigned his rights were not infringed upon. The only other argument would be that he was harassed to the point of resignation within the White House. Since in this case it was outside forces that may have caused him to resign his ability to file a case would be limited. In any case those are hypothetical cases.
Nothing like finishing my thoughts.
217 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:33:23am |
re: #214 Gus 802
I had to look him up. I found this quote:
"Socialism in America will come through the ballot box."
218 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:33:49am |
re: #215 austin_blue
Because you assume that he is still politically radical without a single shred of evidence! You deny that he can change as Reagan and Olansky did!
It's like arguing with a dining room table.
First of all, you can adjust your fucking tone.
Secondly, he glommed onto these ideals on the '90's, and even as late as 2001. I see no evidence that he no longer believes these things, do you? We only have the man's quotes.
219 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:34:54am |
re: #212 TheMatrix31
He wouldn't have resigned or been fired if everything was bullshit, I don't think.
You mean hounded out of his job by the same people who have been banned from this board? Okey dokey, then. That makes it OK.
220 | Fenway_Nation Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:35:17am |
re: #215 austin_blue
These days, seems like the only 'change' an 0bama appointee needs to make is to be more discreet about their rhetoric.
221 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:36:15am |
re: #217 BatGuano
I had to look him up. I found this quote:
"Socialism in America will come through the ballot box."
Yep, that would be him. The infamous Gus Hall.
222 | Fenway_Nation Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:37:00am |
re: #219 austin_blue
You mean hounded out of his job by the same people who have been banned from this board? Okey dokey, then. That makes it OK.
Umm...frankly the 'inside baseball' of how he got his job is far more disturbing to me than how he lost it
223 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:37:11am |
re: #219 austin_blue
You mean hounded out of his job by the same people who have been banned from this board? Okey dokey, then. That makes it OK.
This has little to do with Beck, and even less to do with nutjob ex-LGF members.
His views and his past were exposed. Weather that has to do with trooferism is not the point; there was plenty more that was embarrassing to the Obama Administration, and for that, he's out on his ass. Why is that a problem?
224 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:37:14am |
re: #219 austin_blue
You mean hounded out of his job by the same people who have been banned from this board? Okey dokey, then. That makes it OK.
Never said that. I'm just thinking that Obama and the admin are smart enough not to fire someone if there's nothing to anything, ya know?
Oh well, I mean I don't even care anymore. Jones is done, it's good, whatever.
225 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:37:52am |
re: #218 astronmr20
First of all, you can adjust your fucking tone.
Secondly, he glommed onto these ideals on the '90's, and even as late as 2001. I see no evidence that he no longer believes these things, do you? We only have the man's quotes.
Well, yes. The fact that he hasn't spoken on these subjects since then speaks volumes to me. Apparently, not to you.
226 | rightwinger3 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:39:10am |
re: #223 astronmr20
This has little to do with Beck, and even less to do with nutjob ex-LGF members.
His views and his past were exposed. Weather that has to do with trooferism is not the point; there was plenty more that was embarrassing to the Obama Administration, and for that, he's out on his ass. Why is that a problem?
Excellent rotating title nominee!
227 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:41:35am |
re: #225 austin_blue
Well, yes. The fact that he hasn't spoken on these subjects since then speaks volumes to me. Apparently, not to you.
Yup. He "re-invented" himself pretty quickly while Obama was running for office, no?
The past matters, and it matters to moderates, left, and right. It matters to a lot of people that voted for this clown.
However, I do disagree with the "rumors" about jones being repeated as fact by Fox News. But the rest of the stuff he has said and done on camera and on print was more than enough to have him "resign."
As Fenway mentioned, this was embarrassing and troubling for the Administration not because of Jones' past specifically, but because of how he was hired.
228 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:43:43am |
Here is what an innocent man says:"Which office do I go to get my reputation back?"
229 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:49:36am |
re: #223 astronmr20
This has little to do with Beck, and even less to do with nutjob ex-LGF members.
His views and his past were exposed. Weather that has to do with trooferism is not the point; there was plenty more that was embarrassing to the Obama Administration, and for that, he's out on his ass. Why is that a problem?
Look, I am solidly behind Charles' position on this subject, I think. It isn't the trooferism, it is that a man was hounded out of his job by a group of people carrying pitchforks and torches. And, at some fundamental level, you seem to support the result, if not the tactics. I think it's wrong.
230 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:52:52am |
re: #229 austin_blue
Look, I am solidly behind Charles' position on this subject, I think. It isn't the trooferism, it is that a man was hounded out of his job by a group of people carrying pitchforks and torches. And, at some fundamental level, you seem to support the result, if not the tactics. I think it's wrong.
Hounded for distortions of standards that are being hypocritically applied.
231 | astronmr20 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:54:07am |
re: #229 austin_blue
I do agree;
If we are talking about the tactics, I'm against them-- especially when it comes to stating rumor as fact.
I was under the impression that you were defending Jones and his validity as a "green jobs czar," whatever the hell that is (and whatever the hell green jobs are).
In any event, we probably aren't disagreeing with each other as much as we think. Apologies for being touchy.
---off to bed.
232 | Fenway_Nation Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:55:05am |
So...how many 'green jobs' were created on Van Jones' watch, anyways?
233 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:55:32am |
re: #231 astronmr20
I do agree;
If we are talking about the tactics, I'm against them-- especially when it comes to stating rumor as fact.
100% agree here.
234 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:56:31am |
re: #230 Sharmuta
Hounded for distortions of standards that are being hypocritically applied.
Yes. Thank you.
235 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 2:57:33am |
re: #231 astronmr20
I do agree;
If we are talking about the tactics, I'm against them-- especially when it comes to stating rumor as fact.
I was under the impression that you were defending Jones and his validity as a "green jobs czar," whatever the hell that is (and whatever the hell green jobs are).
In any event, we probably aren't disagreeing with each other as much as we think. Apologies for being touchy.
---off to bed.
No worries! Have sweet dreams.
236 | rightwinger3 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:02:11am |
re: #184 BatGuano
Squabbling, bickering, sniping .,etc
Bat, what's up with that...I've been out of the U.S. for a while too...don't tell me McCain lost?
237 | austin_blue Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:02:15am |
And I am off to the land of Somnos, myself. Adios.
238 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:03:21am |
re: #236 rightwinger3
Bat, what's up with that...I've been out of the U.S. for a while too...don't tell me McCain lost?
Just a rumor spread by the liberal media.
//
239 | BatGuano Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:03:39am |
re: #232 Fenway_Nation
Good question:
Austen_blue: #152
"How was his job performance in the position in which he was hired?"
240 | rightwinger3 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:04:37am |
re: #230 Sharmuta
Hounded for distortions of standards that are being hypocritically applied.
Sharm, happens on both sides a lot. I think Charles said it all last thread: "...just a weary disgust..."
242 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:06:34am |
Like it or not, politics is a blood sport. If ya don't wanna play, don't jump in.
243 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:06:57am |
green jobs are like unicorns nice to talk about but has anyone ever seen one.
244 | rightwinger3 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:08:10am |
245 | Gus Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:09:06am |
US fury as Israel defies settlement freeze call
US attacks Israel over West Bank settlements
Fury, attacks. It's interesting how this administration not once was furious or attacked Iran's crackdown during their election nor the missile launches from North Korea.
249 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:12:38am |
re: #246 HoosierHoops
Hoops is here! That means we get to start hitting the beer soon!
251 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:14:31am |
re: #249 Cannadian Club Akbar
Hoops is here! That means we get to start hitting the beer soon!
LOL
Can't buy beer on Sundays in Indiana...Jesus hates beer on sunday..
/buy ahead of time..*wink*
252 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:17:02am |
re: #251 HoosierHoops
That's why I live in Florida! I have been in bars that were open 24/7/365.
253 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:19:37am |
re: #252 Cannadian Club Akbar
That's why I live in Florida! I have been in bars that were open 24/7/365.
I have never been to Florida...Everybody from Indiana goes there for vacation during the winter... I think I'll fly down and play some Golf this Jan or Feb..
254 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:22:48am |
re: #253 HoosierHoops
I was born in Indy. We moved here in '72. Golf during winter is awesome. A bit crowded, but you can't ask for nicer weather. 72 degrees.
255 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:26:35am |
re: #254 Cannadian Club Akbar
I was born in Indy. We moved here in '72. Golf during winter is awesome. A bit crowded, but you can't ask for nicer weather. 72 degrees.
I was born and raised in California...We transfered here for my job...
I don't have the warm and fuzzy for snow and cold weather..It sucks so far
256 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:29:28am |
re: #255 HoosierHoops
I didn't see snow, that I actually remembered, until I was 30. Pretty at first, but then you have to drive in it. Then the salt. Then the plows. Then the grey.
257 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:31:24am |
re: #245 Gus 802
surprise surprise
the leftist university chatting class has been anti semitic for years the zero came out of the hydepark uber liberal university chatting class were do you think he meets people like ayers, rev wright, van Jones, that Boston prof who cried racist wolf. etc.
frankly the more is see him he keeps getting worse than i expected the uber left university chatting class can have there POTU$
258 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:32:52am |
I for one love the snow and cold it keeps the urban rift raft indoors.
259 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:33:38am |
re: #258 yochanan
I for one love the snow and cold it keeps the urban rift raft indoors.
Stop calling me that.
/
260 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:35:47am |
re: #258 yochanan
I for one love the snow and cold it keeps the urban rift raft indoors.
Nooo! LOL
I can only remember one time in Napa that it snowed.and just a little bit.
You got to man up in Indiana..It frigging snows a lot here...
261 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:37:37am |
re: #260 HoosierHoops
I have a friend who lives in Vermont. She told me I would never make it up there. I believe her.:)
262 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:38:04am |
re: #260 HoosierHoops
well i live in chicagostan and we sometimes get real winter and north west ind. gets lake snow
263 | Jack Burton Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:38:25am |
re: #232 Fenway_Nation
So...how many 'green jobs' were created on Van Jones' watch, anyways?
Only green nutjobs as far as I can tell.
264 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:41:36am |
re: #263 ArchangelMichael
well i did learn from the local uber left university chatting class that if you don't like a POTU$ you don't have to accept him as your POTU$ so I just might fellow there fine and educated example. esp if their POTU$ keeps trying to make parts of Jerusalem judenfrei
JERUSALEM WAS THE CAPITAL OF THE JEWS WHEN WASHINGTON,D.C., PARIS AND LONDON WERE SWAMPS.
265 | SixDegrees Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:43:33am |
re: #201 freetoken
That is part of what is so very disturbing.
Why stop at Van Jones? How many people who work in that office have similar, or otherwise unpopular to the right-o-sphere, opinions on all sorts of topics? Should they be outed too?
Why stop there - heck, let's check all the federal employees. Shall we administer oath tests (to the ideals of
the JBSGlenn Beck) for their fitness for employment? After all, what if there is a federal employee somewhere (among the couple of million) who were, gasp, part of a forbidden group on a college campus somewhere!For all the hand-wringing about Van Jone's offensive (to some) ideology, no one, and I mean no one, has posted an example, even a single one, on how it affected his job. Not a single example of him misallocating funds. Now, there could be some, of course, but there is no evidence to date.
Van Jones did not run for or occupy an elected office.
Exactly. It's now going to be open season, and character assassination is going to be the weapon of choice. And if that assassination involves making shit up, well, that's going to be just fine, too. There'll probably be a whole cottage industry springing up designing websites that provide proof of affiliation with Troofers for [insert your enemy's name here].
As for Jones' fitness for his job: frankly, his membership in the Noetic Institute disqualifies him from holding any sort of scientific advisory position. It puts him on a par with Bigfoot hunters and cerealologists, neither of which are qualified to render scientific advice in any capacity. Jones' brain simply isn't wired correctly to do that sort of work, and he should never have been considered for it in the first place.
267 | SixDegrees Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:44:50am |
268 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:44:52am |
269 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:45:52am |
re: #263 ArchangelMichael
CAP AND TAX will destroy the current American econ. destroying hundreds of thousands of jobs HOPIUM to be filled with will of the wisp green jobs (which are sort of like unicorns we talk about them but has anyone ever seen one?)
my HOPE AND CHANGE is that their POTU$ will only last one term and hopefully we can fix all the damage he creates.
270 | Jack Burton Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:50:55am |
re: #265 SixDegrees
The information in Charles post about "Obama's Pseudo-science advisor" was all I needed to know to confirm the man had no business being a science advisor to the POTUS. Everything else that came up after, true or not was immaterial and that fact that these other things were harped on much more loudly than his quackery I found rather disturbing.
272 | Jack Burton Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:52:18am |
re: #271 PaulKo
You don't need to be asked to be removed dumbass. Just go away. Stop reading it. Your little attention whore drama queen moment will be deleted as well.
273 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:52:45am |
re: #271 PaulKo
really a rather dumb flounce please do a better job next time a good flounce can be entertaining and educational.
274 | SixDegrees Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:53:04am |
re: #271 PaulKo
I've asked to be removed from this POS blog with no success... maybe I can get banned/permanently removed by adding profane comments?
Please FUCKING delete me.
(Sorry in advance for the language, but desperate times call for desperate methods).
Thanks
paulko
If you just can't keep yourself away from here, that's your problem.
Check "Mental Health Counseling" in the Yellow Pages, and contact a practitioner near you.
275 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:53:10am |
re: #271 PaulKo
Fuck off you crying bitch... Nobody put a gun to your head to come here..
Just fucking leave and never come back... Is that so hard to understand?
276 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:55:21am |
I keep going to this girls house and she keeps letting me in. Please make it stop! Idiot.
277 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:55:32am |
re: #271 PaulKo
Grow up. Don't log back in and consider yourself forgotten.
278 | SixDegrees Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:55:49am |
re: #270 ArchangelMichael
The information in Charles post about "Obama's Pseudo-science advisor" was all I needed to know to confirm the man had no business being a science advisor to the POTUS. Everything else that came up after, true or not was immaterial and that fact that these other things were harped on much more loudly than his quackery I found rather disturbing.
Yup. I'm afraid this will be used to cast the Right as the Party of Drooling Idiots and Liars in the near future. And it will certainly open the floodgates for further unfounded character assassination, even when there are credible reasons to criticize.
279 | SixDegrees Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:57:39am |
re: #277 Sharmuta
Grow up. Don't log back in and consider yourself forgotten.
I think being officially banned is the price of admission to some of the stalker blogs. Or at least a badge of honor.
Which is even more pathetic when you consider that this is how people like PaulKo measure how meaningful their lives are.
280 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 3:59:01am |
re: #278 SixDegrees
just because some t.v. talking head says something doesn't mean it is not true
file it under the broken clock is right twice a day rule.
and the last time i looked we still have freedom of speech (although sometimes the uber liberal university chatting class think that it only applies to them) and that we of the less than equal to them should do as they tell us.
283 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:03:33am |
re: #281 HoosierHoops
Van Jones quits today!
George Soros will hire him and put him to work for twice the money, I'm sure. Can you say VANPAC?
284 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:03:57am |
285 | SixDegrees Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:05:10am |
re: #280 yochanan
just because some t.v. talking head says something doesn't mean it is not true
file it under the broken clock is right twice a day rule.
and the last time i looked we still have freedom of speech (although sometimes the uber liberal university chatting class think that it only applies to them) and that we of the less than equal to them should do as they tell us.
There's no justification for lying. Don't even try to concoct one.
286 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:06:03am |
re: #14 Sharmuta
You are the best, HypnoToad. Everybody loves HypnoToad. All hail!
That Hypnotoad is truly a beautiful creature. I should begin to obey him...
287 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:07:28am |
re: #271 PaulKo
You could just go away. Go quietly and we won't miss you.
Flounce away and we'll miss you less, but we will laugh at you.
288 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:09:03am |
re: #287 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
You could just go away. Go quietly and we won't miss you.
Flounce away and we'll miss you less, but we will laugh at you.
You should change you nic to Mean Bastard Vegetarian.
///
289 | UncleRancher Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:11:34am |
re: #281 HoosierHoops
Van Jones quits today!
Is that a prediction or a done deal?
/Just woke up. Haven't checked the news yet.
290 | SixDegrees Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:12:00am |
A case like this, abducting a child and keeping him hidden in a secret room for two full years, never allowed even to go outside, carries a maximum sentence of one to three years?
Maybe it's just me, but shouldn't that be more like one to three lifetimes?
Glad the kid was found and seems OK. But...damn. That doesn't seem like nearly enough incarceration. Ma and Grandma are obviously crazy in a very bad way, and the kid's only going to be ten, at most, when they get out. the chances of them trying another abduction seems huge.
291 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:12:13am |
re: #288 Cannadian Club Akbar
Moi?
I love the "I hate this blog" flounce messages in the wee hours when they know that Charles is "resting the ponytail".
What these guys just don't get; We don't gasp... we don't panic... we just point and laugh
292 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:12:27am |
re: #289 UncleRancher
Is that a prediction or a done deal?
/Just woke up. Haven't checked the news yet.
Done deal..I just heard it on the news
Good Morning
293 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:14:02am |
re: #291 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Isn't that 2 in 2 days?
294 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:14:17am |
295 | UncleRancher Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:14:25am |
re: #292 HoosierHoops
Done deal..I just heard it on the news
Good Morning
Most excellent! Looks like "the public" got under their skin a little.
297 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:18:22am |
re: #293 Cannadian Club Akbar
Ain't that a line from South Park...
"Hey, do your impression of David Caruso's carreer after NYPD Blue!"
Ike jumps out a window...
299 | SixDegrees Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:19:22am |
re: #296 Dov
Wow. A content-free post.
Is that in any way related to Chomsky's context-free grammars?
301 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:20:25am |
A founce within a flounce.
Flouncy bouncy flouncy wouncy, fun fun fun fun fun...
But the most wonderful thing about flouncing, I'm not the only one!
I'm nooot! the only one.
302 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:21:26am |
re: #296 Dov
fuck you Dov...Nobody put a gun to your head to come here..Idiot..
303 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:22:08am |
Do we need a suicide watch? Or a weekend pool?
304 | SixDegrees Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:22:10am |
re: #296 Dov
Anyone who's tempted to gloat at me over this, despite the fact that I've said very clearly Van Jones shouldn't have been in that position, don't waste your time. Take it somewhere else. Post that garbage here and it will be the last comment you post at LGF.
Charles Johnson
Please Ban me
Your post as quoted above reeks of censorship. On Van Jones I agree. On censoring, Hitler agrees with you.
Please ban me Mr. Censor
I smell sockpuppets.
305 | UncleRancher Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:22:17am |
Hey Fenway rumor has it they're making a new runaway train movie. Heard anything?
306 | Jack Burton Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:22:38am |
re: #296 Dov
Hitler agreed that you need oxygen to survive. Stop breathing?
307 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:22:41am |
re: #302 HoosierHoops
fuck you Dov...Nobody put a gun to your head to come here..Idiot..
That is not fair, HH. Right now, someone is holding a gun to his head and making him flounce.
Doesn't want to do it, but..., you know... the gun...
308 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:23:03am |
re: #304 SixDegrees
You need to quit quoting flounces. You will get deleted too.
309 | Jack Burton Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:23:09am |
re: #299 SixDegrees
Wow. A content-free post.
Is that in any way related to Chomsky's context-free grammars?
Yeah
S -> bS
310 | Unions = Innovation slash slash Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:23:47am |
It always cracks me up when folks posting on a privately owned internet forum whine about being censored or their first amendment right being denied.
Comedy Gold!
311 | SixDegrees Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:23:57am |
re: #308 Sharmuta
You need to quit quoting flounces. You will get deleted too.
Thanks for the tip. Noted.
312 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:24:04am |
re: #308 Sharmuta
You need to quit quoting flounces. You will get deleted too.
"Quoting Flounces"...
That'd be a good name for an LGF poetry book.
313 | Jack Burton Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:24:18am |
1000 Quatloos another sleeper asshole troll flounce will happen within the next 30 minutes.
315 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:24:44am |
re: #312 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
"Quoting Flounces"...
That'd be a good name for an LGF poetry book.
Or the LGF Etiquette rules.
316 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:25:28am |
re: #313 ArchangelMichael
1000 Quatloos another sleeper asshole troll flounce will happen within the next 30 minutes.
Which thread?
317 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:25:41am |
re: #310 rwdflynavy
It always cracks me up when folks posting on a privately owned internet forum whine about being censored or their first amendment right being denied.
Comedy Gold!
It's gold, Jerry! Gold!
-Bania
320 | Unions = Innovation slash slash Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:26:22am |
re: #314 Cannadian Club Akbar
Phil Hendry fan, are you?
Don't know him, but after the google, I think I would be a fan.
322 | Unions = Innovation slash slash Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:27:49am |
re: #319 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
You still in Roanoke?
Yep,
Leave tomorrow for Jax FL. Funeral was Friday and was very well attended. I didn't do too bad on the eugoogalee. FIL was a great man.
323 | Jack Burton Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:29:14am |
I think I need to get a copy of the Gamesters of Triskelion and make some video clips of the important "quatloos" parts for just such opportunities.
324 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:29:16am |
re: #322 rwdflynavy
Yep,
Leave tomorrow for Jax FL. Funeral was Friday and was very well attended. I didn't do too bad on the eugoogalee. FIL was a great man.
Sorry to hear about your loss..I hope God grants peace and Grace to your Wife and family
325 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:29:47am |
re: #322 rwdflynavy
You just quoted Zoolander! Woohoo!
Tried to see you on here and invite you out for a beer. Gotta get ready for church though. Back River Grill is nice.
326 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:30:09am |
re: #325 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Back Creek, I mean... duh
328 | Unions = Innovation slash slash Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:36:29am |
re: #325 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
You just quoted Zoolander! Woohoo!
Tried to see you on here and invite you out for a beer. Gotta get ready for church though. Back River Grill is nice.
Appreciate the thought. Hope to look you up at a later time. Any chance you go to Westhampton Christian church? If so, I'll see you there. Art Kraus is my FIL in case you happen to know him.
329 | Unions = Innovation slash slash Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:39:55am |
re: #328 rwdflynavy
I'm a big Zoolander fan. It was one of my helo detachment's movies on cruise. We watched it a bunch and knew it by heart.
330 | Unions = Innovation slash slash Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:46:29am |
re: #324 HoosierHoops
Sorry to hear about your loss..I hope God grants peace and Grace to your Wife and family
Thanks HH. Appreciate that.
331 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:50:03am |
Gotta run y'all... Singing this morning for Church.
Singing This...
Yep.
Speaking of "flounces"... we might have a little flouncing of old folks today.
I hope not.
333 | razorbacker Sun, Sep 6, 2009 4:53:03am |
'Morning, Peeps.
I'm sitting here with intermittittant connectivity, so there must be some vile weather to the southeast. Wife headed to Arkansas2 to visit her closest friend (and my ex-girlfriend) from the old days. She wanted to know if I wanted to go, but no. I've heard all the old stories, I'm the butt of most of the jokes, so I can live without it. She'll come back tomorrow calmer, with renewed spirit. I hope.
The sky is that odd brassy color that indicates more thundershowers today. I guess I'll be working in the shop again. Well, not like there's naught to do there, there just isn't anything that I want to do there.
334 | UncleRancher Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:01:24am |
re: #333 razorbacker
Well you could always clean up the shop. I never seem to have time for that.
335 | razorbacker Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:09:08am |
re: #334 UncleRancher
Well you could always clean up the shop. I never seem to have time for that.
That falls into that vast category of 'things that I don't want to do'.
I guess, once the hardware stores open, that I can go buy a 3/16" rolled pin to replace the 1/4" rolled pin that I mistakenly bought. I don't seem to have a big enough hammer to drive the 1/4" pin into that 3/16" hole. Must not be swinging the sledge hard enough. Being as how I'm trying to repair one of those 'hi-lift' farm jacks, it's probably best to use the correct part.
336 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:12:19am |
re: #335 razorbacker
After changing bucket pins on trackhoes, I could murder a golf ball. Not straight, but far.:)
337 | razorbacker Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:13:56am |
re: #336 Cannadian Club Akbar
After changing bucket pins on trackhoes, I could murder a golf ball. Not straight, but far.:)
I'm reminded of those words of wisdom from my father.
"Don't force that, Son. Get a bigger hammer."
338 | UncleRancher Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:14:11am |
re: #335 razorbacker
That falls into that vast category of 'things that I don't want to do'.
I guess, once the hardware stores open, that I can go buy a 3/16" rolled pin to replace the 1/4" rolled pin that I mistakenly bought. I don't seem to have a big enough hammer to drive the 1/4" pin into that 3/16" hole. Must not be swinging the sledge hard enough. Being as how I'm trying to repair one of those 'hi-lift' farm jacks, it's probably best to use the correct part.
Yep, probably better use the right part for that. I know the feeling, long weekend under way. I WAS going to pour an aluminum casting, but ran short of casting sand of the right kind. None close, but I can't even get some on the way here until Tuesday.
339 | opnion Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:15:54am |
Good morning. I woke up to the news that Van Jones has resigned.
I just scrolled through the last thread .
It seemed to me there is a sentiment, that this 'fine" man was hounded out by evil Right Wing forces & ujustly. Have I got that
341 | razorbacker Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:17:19am |
re: #338 UncleRancher
Yep, probably better use the right part for that. I know the feeling, long weekend under way. I WAS going to pour an aluminum casting, but ran short of casting sand of the right kind. None close, but I can't even get some on the way here until Tuesday.
I'm debating the ecological sins of burning $10 worth of precious gasoline to buy a 37 cent part.
Kinda like casting sand, I bet.
342 | UncleRancher Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:19:46am |
re: #341 razorbacker
I'm debating the ecological sins of burning $10 worth of precious gasoline to buy a 37 cent part.
Kinda like casting sand, I bet.
Yep, a LOT like casting sand. I could buy new solid blanks for about $400 apiece, or cast what I want with materials on hand. Now if I could just get my hands on another couple bags of sand...
343 | BARACK THE VOTE Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:20:10am |
re: #271 PaulKo
Don't let the door hit you in your mangina on the way out.
344 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:21:39am |
re: #343 iceweasel
Don't let the door hit you in your mangina on the way out.
Surprised you are still awake...
345 | Lucius Septimius Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:21:48am |
Morning.
I finally got around to reading Peggy Noonan's latest attempt to dissect Obama. While I think she was wrong a bunch of times on the election cycle, she did nail these two points: Obama is boring; Obama isn't "cool" -- he's cold.
In the first case, he is boring. He says the same things with the same intonation over and over and over again: same logic based on the same tired and unreflected-upon premises, same buzzwords, same catchphrases. Nothing new to hear. In fact, there hasn't been anything new to hear from him since he took office, ripped off the "hopey-change" mask and proved all those folks that thought he was far too much of a radical leftist to be president correct.
Duh. Those of us who had actually been paying attention weren't surprised one bit. Watching his presidency has been like watching that Andy Warhol movie about the Empire State Building or the Chrysler Building or whatever it was. I fell asleep; and if it weren't for screaming protesters and the regular fourth-act hysteria of Pelosi and the rest of the Congressional Summer Stock troupe, America as a whole would have lapsed into a torpor listening to the young, hip, "articulate" President.
Calvin Coolidge had more charisma. At least he could be funny.
Which leads to the second observation. There is something genuinely cold and unfeeling about this man. What outside observers viewed as "cool" was not cool, but a lack of feeling. I don't get the impression the man has much empathy with others. He most certainly cannot see anyone else's point of view and unlike, at least for a while, Bush II, he cannot countenance having anyone near him who doesn't agree with him.
No, that's not correct. Who knows if he actually agrees with Bill Ayers or Van Jones? I suspect he hasn't really thought enough about it to genuinely say one way or another. Obama's leftism isn't heart-felt, but it isn't just a pose either. It is not a reflex -- indeed that's the point: it appears to be totally unreflexive. It does not spring from passion, misguided or no, nor from a carefully considered set of ideological principles (as was the case with Hillary). Listening to the man, I have a hard time figuring out where his ideas come from. The image one gets is of him sitting silently listening to his leftist advisers going on great guns about all their plans, occasionally asking questions, and then saying "make it so," albeit without one iota of the charm and wit of Patrick Stewart, yet another man who can laugh at himself.
Perhaps it's simply narcissism in its most basic form -- a total unflagging belief in one's own rectitude. The coldness -- the lack of feeling or emotion -- could be explained by that. True narcissists are incapable of empathy and incapable of sensing any emotions in others besides anger. But it could also be something else -- lack of depth. Perhaps the greatest weakness of Obama is not his convictions, nor his "race" (however we want to define that), but a fundamental shallowness that now, when he has to do something other than mouth empty formulae, is thrown into sharp (and convex) relief.
346 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:23:07am |
Van Jones reminds me of an over used bedpan. It could be usefull, but it would take a lot of cleaning up, and the nasty smell would linger for quite a while even if you used the most effective disinfectants.
347 | razorbacker Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:23:23am |
re: #340 Cannadian Club Akbar
I miss that kind of work.
Life is funny, thataways. I couldn't wait to get away, get an education, and get one of those cushy white-collar gigs.
So I did.
Then I couldn't wait to acquire enough money to tell 'em to stick it where the sun seldom shines and go off and piddle my days way doing just what I wanted to get away from in the first place.
So I did.
Fact is, I don't exactly know what I want to do. Maybe when I grow up.
I'm a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, wrapped up in bacon and shoved up a dog's behind.
Or something like that.
349 | BARACK THE VOTE Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:25:30am |
re: #270 ArchangelMichael
The information in Charles post about "Obama's Pseudo-science advisor" was all I needed to know to confirm the man had no business being a science advisor to the POTUS. Everything else that came up after, true or not was immaterial and that fact that these other things were harped on much more loudly than his quackery I found rather disturbing.
AM-- totally agree. You know I'm way on the left but my issue with Jones has always been the connection with pseudo-science. That bothered me a hell of a lot, and I would have loved to see him bounced for that, or for any legit reason-- just not as the result of this made up witch-hunt.
350 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:25:31am |
re: #348 Sharmuta
I'm surprised you are.
yeah I didn't get a lot of sleep. I'm surprised you are up too.
351 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:26:24am |
re: #348 Sharmuta
I'm surprised you are.
I'll write back about what I've been able to find on neanderthals later today.
352 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:26:38am |
re: #349 iceweasel
AM-- totally agree. You know I'm way on the left but my issue with Jones has always been the connection with pseudo-science. That bothered me a hell of a lot, and I would have loved to see him bounced for that, or for any legit reason-- just not as the result of this made up witch-hunt.
Well, was it the "witch-hunt" or everything overall? Didn't it say "controversial statements"? Sounds like it was an overall thing.
353 | Lucius Septimius Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:29:16am |
re: #352 TheMatrix31
Well, was it the "witch-hunt" or everything overall? Didn't it say "controversial statements"? Sounds like it was an overall thing.
Judging by what I saw in the general press, his comments about Columbine, about Republicans being sphincters, and the "crack pipe" statement were what did him in. It's hard to make a pitch for "works well with others" on the basis of those kinds of remarks.
Perhaps they didn't get to the heart of his scientific ignorance, but they did point to a set of attitudes that wouldn't play in Peoria, and in politics, that's all that matters.
354 | BARACK THE VOTE Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:29:46am |
re: #344 LudwigVanQuixote
Surprised you are still awake...
So am I! ;)
I've been looking for a good version of Little Red Corvette on yourube. Sadly, to no avail. I have an urge to listen to prince...
356 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:30:58am |
re: #345 Lucius Septimius
The President I believe is not a bad guy, he is just a naive, confused well intentioned Liberal who makes decisions based on gut feeling and emotions and ignores facts and hard evidence when it conflicts with his agenda.
I just pray that his naivete and his willingness to ignore inconvenient facts does not cause our nation irreparable injury. We should pray for him.
358 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:36:19am |
re: #353 Lucius Septimius
Van Jones is a jerk who does not deserve to be paid by the tax payers. I cannot imagine why someone as boisterous, divisive and crude every gained so much attention to be selected to a place of such responsibility in the American government.
To serve in government you must be a servant of the people, he it seems had nothing but contempt for at least half of America's citizens. Surely, no one belives that someone who holds so many Americans in such low regards could be an effective public servant.
359 | Oh no...Sand People! Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:37:11am |
It seems to me like a Obama is playing a giant game of 'red rover' with us. He has gathered every 'red' constituent he knows and is throwing them at us. All at once. Now it's up to us to background check every single person charging at us to determine if they are safe to be in their position. Isn't it now over 1,800 plus appointments to 'positions'? So we have caught a 'few', but look at how many have already broken through to the other side.
Imagine what our politics would be like now without the internet. How would we be able to figure out anything about Obama's appointees? What's sad is even WITH the internet we are still getting our trash handed to us.
360 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:41:48am |
re: #359 Oh no...Sand People!
It seems to me like a Obama is playing a giant game of 'red rover' with us. He has gathered every 'red' constituent he knows and is throwing them at us. All at once. Now it's up to us to background check every single person charging at us to determine if they are safe to be in their position. Isn't it now over 1,800 plus appointments to 'positions'? So we have caught a 'few', but look at how many have already broken through to the other side.
Imagine what our politics would be like now without the internet. How would we be able to figure out anything about Obama's appointees? What's sad is even WITH the internet we are still getting our trash handed to us.
It is part of the general ineptitude in the administration regarding details. This, remember is the same State Department that gave us the embarrasment of the "reset" button.
If they can't tranlate a word that is to be used as a diplomaic gift, should we really expect them to be able to carefully examine a political appointee's background?
361 | razorbacker Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:45:32am |
Here it is the County Judge, along with the Justices of the Peace, that pretty much run the county.
Two election cycles ago, I was approached to run for JP. I told them, 'But, Fellers, I'm not a Democrat.'
"We know, but you don't exactly seem to be a Republican, either. We'll get you elected, then you just vote your conscience."
I declined, because I didn't want to undergo the full rectum scan that would inevitably occur. If they turned up even a fraction of the foolishness that I've done, much less said, I'd have been mortified.
There is my main problem, I reckon. A sense of shame.
362 | Oh no...Sand People! Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:48:01am |
re: #360 shanec99
It is part of the general ineptitude in the administration regarding details. This, remember is the same State Department that gave us the embarrasment of the "reset" button.
If they can't tranlate a word that is to be used as a diplomaic gift, should we really expect them to be able to carefully examine a political appointee's background?
This is where I would challenge your 'naive' President assumption. This man knows exactly what he is doing as well as his handlers in whom he has agreed to play puppet. He's just frustrated that the 'silent' majority isn't sitting on it's hands anymore and is actually calling him out via the internet. What sucks though, in my opinion, is the way the 'right' is handling the rebuttals, but at least they are doing something now, which is a positive. Now if the Repubs, will just come up with solutions as opposed to just scoring political points. But if that didn't happen it wouldn't be politics and we wouldn't need politicians...*eyes mist over*...
But yeah, I would love to chat longer on this, but gotta get kids to bed in my neck of the world. Take care all.
363 | UncleRancher Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:48:56am |
re: #361 razorbacker
...
There is my main problem, I reckon. A sense of shame.
That obviously makes you a conservative. Maybe not Republican, but conservative, definitely.
364 | razorbacker Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:56:29am |
See Y'all later.
I'd best stir about, feed the outside animals, and get into the day.
365 | FrogMarch Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:57:12am |
On Friday, I had the rare honor of appearing in the pages of the New York Times, apropos President Obama’s plans to beam himself into every schoolhouse in the land in the peculiar belief that Generation iPod will find this an enthralling technical novelty. As Times reporters James C. McKinley Jr. and Sam Dillon wrote:“Mark Steyn, a Canadian author and political commentator, speaking on the Rush Limbaugh show on Wednesday, accused Mr. Obama of trying to create a cult of personality, comparing him to Saddam Hussein and Kim Jong Il, the North Korean leader.”
Oh, dear! “A Canadian author”: Talk about damning with faint credentialization. I don’t know what’s crueler, the “Canadian” or the indefinite article.
As to the rest of it, well, that’s one way of putting it. Here’s what I said on Wednesday re dear old Saddam and Kim:
“Obviously we’re not talking about the cult of personality on the Saddam Hussein/Kim Jong Il scale.”
Close enough for Times work.
366 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 5:58:07am |
re: #362 Oh no...Sand People!
You know, why I call him naive is because of the way he behaves. He aligns himself with some really nasty folks and does not examine their background. No young, ambitious politician for example who knew about Ayers' or Wright's history would align themself with those characters. The point is that the President did, and only reluctantly distanced himself from them when the evidence of their misconduct was screamed at him (see what happened in the case of the cop and Harvard professor).
I think he believes generally in the inherent goodness of his fellow man, he is an extremely naive optimist who bends over backwards to forgive on his side and tries his best to find redeeming qualities in the most dastardly miscreant.
He is a naive pretty boy who has the gifts to inspire. If we could only get him to open his eyes to reality... we must pray for him, and pray that his wilfull ignorance does not cause irreperable damage to the nation.
367 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:00:04am |
re: #358 shanec99
are you talking about van jones or the zero?
368 | Killian Bundy Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:00:24am |
opponents of reform have mounted a vicious smear campaign against me. They are using lies and distortions to distract and divide
Really?
/the guy's a one man YouTube channel of ugliness
369 | Kenneth Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:00:28am |
re: #296 Dov
On censoring, Hitler agrees with you.
...because Hitler was infamous for banning people from his website.
Right.
370 | _RememberTonyC Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:00:31am |
Good morning all. Does President Obama get a $4500 rebate for trading in that "clunker" of a "Van?"
371 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:02:08am |
There are times when it's fun to live in NYC. I attended a performance of Pericles last night, and who showed up? Bill and Hillary Clinton with their security entourage.
372 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:03:06am |
re: #367 yochanan
are you talking about van jones or the zero?
Van Jones is a jerk and nasty person. The President is an inexperienced, naive, pretty boy, with tremendous political skills, but not the kind of leader and administrator our nation needs. He has surrounded himself with incompetent yes men.
373 | UncleRancher Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:03:44am |
re: #370 _RememberTonyC
Good morning all. Does President Obama get a $4500 rebate for trading in that "clunker" of a "Van?"
Well put.
374 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:04:19am |
re: #366 shanec99
i don't think this is accidental at all this is standard fair from the uber liberal university chatting class.
this is the real zero
the uber liberal university chatting class GOT THEIR POTU$
and we learned from said uber liberal university chatting class if you don't like a POTU$ he doesn't have to be your POTU$
what is fair for the goose is fair for the gander.
375 | _RememberTonyC Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:05:17am |
re: #373 UncleRancher
Thanks ... has jones made any comment yet?
376 | FrogMarch Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:06:02am |
re: #345 Lucius Septimius
Good Morning.
I don't get the impression the man has much empathy with others. He most certainly cannot see anyone else's point of view...
I get that impression as well.
377 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:06:19am |
re: #373 UncleRancher
Well put.
That van should never be re-cycled through any program... it should be preserved permanently as the type of "public servant" who should never be afforded the opportunity to serve in high public office.
378 | Lucius Septimius Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:06:48am |
re: #375 _RememberTonyC
Thanks ... has jones made any comment yet?
He said we were all a**holes and obviously were in crisis and had guns.
379 | UncleRancher Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:08:22am |
re: #375 _RememberTonyC
Thanks ... has jones made any comment yet?
380 | _RememberTonyC Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:08:57am |
re: #378 Lucius Septimius
He said we were all a**holes and obviously were in crisis and had guns.
if jones thinks I'm an a** hole, I'll carry the title with pride
381 | Kenneth Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:09:14am |
re: #16 zombie
Excellent and important post.
I cannot understand why Sharmuta would down-ding that information.
383 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:09:56am |
van jones is standard fair in the uber liberal university chatting class from which the zero is well connected please remember this is the social group that he mixed in around hyde park, and the u. of chicago in chicago.
this is group think and is no accident.
384 | midwestgak Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:11:12am |
"The biggest problems that we're facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all. And that's what I intend to reverse when I'm president of the United States."
Sen. Barack Obama, March 31, 2008
Morning Lizards.
385 | _RememberTonyC Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:11:51am |
re: #379 UncleRancher
thanks Uncle ... I can't wait to hear what else he has to say in the upcoming days. now that he is free to express himself, we should start popping the popcorn and get ready for a great show!
386 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:12:19am |
re: #365 FrogMarch
Steyn's mock indignance is as unbecoming as his "cult of personality" quip is idiotic.
387 | Kenneth Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:12:22am |
re: #382 Sharmuta
Your subsequent comments are cryptic. Could you be kind enough to provide a link to a previous comment if it provides greater clarity?
388 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:13:12am |
re: #374 yochanan
i don't think this is accidental at all this is standard fair from the uber liberal university chatting class.
this is the real zero
the uber liberal university chatting class GOT THEIR POTU$and we learned from said uber liberal university chatting class if you don't like a POTU$ he doesn't have to be your POTU$
what is fair for the goose is fair for the gander.
I know, the Libreal elites are more interested in stirring the emotions and reinforcing the self esteem needs of groups who have for one reason or another been made to feel like they are not a part of the American fabric.
They are well intentioned and have important contributions to make in the national discussion, but they ignore facts that could imperil all of us. Liberals only focus on one aspect of what it takes to strenghten a nation and keep it safe.
389 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:13:56am |
391 | Unions = Innovation slash slash Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:17:17am |
And another one gone, another one gone, another one thrown under the bus.
392 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:17:25am |
393 | FrogMarch Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:17:29am |
re: #386 Coracle
Steyn's mock indignance is as unbecoming as his "cult of personality" quip is idiotic.
The larger point is that a huge newspaper couldn't get the quote right.
In fact, twisted it into the opposite.
394 | _RememberTonyC Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:17:55am |
re: #389 shanec99
Yes, thankfully he resigned.
Thanks ... UncleRancher linked to a quote from jones about his resignation. I think in the upcoming days we will hear more of "van jones unplugged" and it will not be pretty.
395 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:18:27am |
re: #384 midwestgak
President Obama's Administration is turning into a weird paradox. On the one hand, the President has left health care"reform" to the Congress, with predictable results. On the other hand, he's bypassed traditional executive branch cabinet posts, departments, and bureaucracies with his "czars".
The "czars" are supposed to be like a modern-day "skunk works", a way to bypass bureaucracy and to signal presidential priorities. Obama has so many of them that he's managed to muddle his "message" with this tactic as well.
396 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:18:33am |
re: #393 FrogMarch
The larger point is that a huge newspaper couldn't get the quote right.
In fact, twisted it into the opposite.
Reporters mangling quotes? Shocking.
397 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:19:40am |
re: #391 rwdflynavy
And another one gone, another one gone, another one thrown under the bus.
This whole administration seems ready to throw a big portion of the nation under the bus, it seems only fair that they sacrifice a few of their own obvious mistakes too.
398 | FrogMarch Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:19:54am |
re: #396 Coracle
Reporters mangling quotes? Shocking.
If should be shocking.
Sadly, it's par for the course with the NYT.
400 | Kenneth Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:20:21am |
Is it possible Van Jones resigned blaming the 9-11 non-issue, as a way to avoid the real damage that was coming with revelations of his radical racialist anti-Jewish positions? Cut him off now and limit the bad news.
401 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:21:04am |
re: #395 quickjustice
The "czars" are supposed to be like a modern-day "skunk works", a way to bypass bureaucracy accountability and Congressional oversight.
morning lizardia!
402 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:21:08am |
re: #393 FrogMarch
If you're a conservative in N.Y., being smeared by the N.Y. Times is a red badge of courage. It's a sign you're effective.
403 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:21:18am |
re: #396 Coracle
the new york slime getting it wrong
surprise surprise
they don't fact check if it fits there bias.
404 | Lucius Septimius Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:21:40am |
re: #400 Kenneth
Is it possible Van Jones resigned blaming the 9-11 non-issue, as a way to avoid the real damage that was coming with revelations of his radical racialist anti-Jewish positions? Cut him off now and limit the bad news.
It would be true to form: don't respond regarding the real and serious accusations and focus on the fluffernutter one. Of course it's standard practice for politicians.
406 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:22:02am |
re: #394 _RememberTonyC
Thanks ... UncleRancher linked to a quote from jones about his resignation. I think in the upcoming days we will hear more of "van jones unplugged" and it will not be pretty.
I really don't care what this miscreant and unapologetic, self declared communist and "Truther" has to say. The sooner we forget this "national boil on the backside of the nation's body politic" the better off we all will be.
407 | bbuddha Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:22:58am |
Good Morning all, I see the Mr. Jones decided to get out of the kitchen. 35? to go
408 | _RememberTonyC Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:23:03am |
re: #406 shanec99
I really don't care what this miscreant and unapologetic, self declared communist and "Truther" has to say. The sooner we forget this "national boil on the backside of the nation's body politic" the better off we all will be.
I'm looking forward to hearing his ranting ... for pure entertainment value.
410 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:24:42am |
re: #16 zombie
One of the issues that really disgusted me about Van Jones which as far as I could tell got ZERO mention in this recent brouhaha was how rabidly anti-Israel he was, to the extent of becoming one of those on-the-scene pro-Palestinian "reporters"/propagandists in the West Bank sent there by the Stalinist radio station KPFA. He also joined in with the frothing maniacs of Students for Justice in Palestine in several "actions," including an infamous one in which they hijacked a Holocaust Remembrance Day and took over the protest site by force and then read kaddish for all the victims of the the murderous Jews.
I witnessed myself that second incident, shortly before I made the conversion to the zombie persona. In fact, it was one of the things that pushed me away from moonbathood.
Much of his vicious anti-Israel (borderline anti-Semitic, it seemed to me) beliefs are now forgotten, but there is some remaining evidence.
For example, there's this page at Indy Media with a transcript of one of his broadcasts from Palestine:
(Indy media redirects LGF links: here's the URL w/spaces for pasting: )
http:// www. indybay .org/newsitems/2002/12/30/15558891.phpI've never seen a report on this infamous day from the pro-Israel side, but from what I witnessed, it was stomach-churning.
being anti ZIONIST SEMITIC is standard fair for the uber liberal university chatting class so the zero's anti Israel activities is the norm.
not a surprise for me that the their POTU$ would crit Israel and say next to nothing on Iran, chevez et al.
411 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:25:09am |
re: #400 Kenneth
Is it possible Van Jones resigned blaming the 9-11 non-issue, as a way to avoid the real damage that was coming with revelations of his radical racialist anti-Jewish positions? Cut him off now and limit the bad news.
Well, we don't really know if the 9-11 thing was a non-issue or not. He never said he DIDN'T sign it, just that the petition does not represent views he has or ever had. So that leaves us with:
He never signed it but doesn't want to accuse his lefty buddies of forging his signature
What he signed was altered to its current form after he signed it (a claim made by someone else - Rabbi Lerner, I believe)
He signed it
In any case, all the videos that went viral were just lethal - that was more than enough. The ONLY reason the Troofer thing even came up was because those videos sent people out hunting.
412 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:26:19am |
re: #408 _RememberTonyC
I'm looking forward to hearing his ranting ... for pure entertainment value.
You find the rantings of an anti-semetic, communist who would accuse our government of being involved in the murder of more than 3,000 of its citizens entertaining?
I for one find it most un-appetizing.
413 | Kenneth Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:26:27am |
Sharmuta,
I went and read all your comments on this thread and the previous thread. I still don't get it. Zombie raised an important point about Van Jones's anti-Jewish activities. What do you object to about that?
414 | FrogMarch Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:26:53am |
To me, the Charles Rengal corruption is a bigger story than Van Jones.
Here we have a US house member who sits on a committee where he has a hand in writing our tax laws. Rengal has hidden hundreds of thousands millions of dollars worth of assets from the IRS.
He's a tax cheat - pure and simple. and instead of stepping down, the man is giving money to those in change of investigating him.
415 | midwestgak Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:27:01am |
State of the Union on CNN states Obama's approval rating is below 50% on economy and healthcare. They didn't post the actual approval percent which made me think of this: If Obama's approval rating is 35%, they could say his rating is below 50% and still be correct.
416 | Killian Bundy Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:27:08am |
"Capitalism is evil," says new Michael Moore film
Capitalism is evil. That is the conclusion of U.S. documentary maker Michael Moore's latest movie "Capitalism: A Love Story," which premieres at the Venice film festival on Sunday.
Blending his trademark humour with tragic individual stories, archive footage and publicity stunts, the 55-year-old launches an attack on the capitalist system, arguing that it benefits the rich and condemns millions to poverty.
/capitalism paid for his massive girth
417 | bbuddha Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:27:17am |
re: #408 _RememberTonyC
Read his resignation, I think he'll go back to his activism just not from the white house[Link: www.foxnews.com...]
418 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:27:44am |
re: #412 shanec99
What part of "he is not a truther" are you finding hard to understand? He's got enough other marks against him that you don't have to rely on made up shit.
419 | FrogMarch Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:28:29am |
re: #416 Killian Bundy
"Capitalism is evil," says new Michael Moore film
/capitalism paid for his massive girth
Michael Moore is a capitalist himself.
420 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:28:36am |
re: #414 FrogMarch
To me, the Charles Rengal corruption is a bigger story than Van Jones.
Here we have a US house member who sits on a committee where he has a hand in writing our tax laws. Rengal has hidden
hundreds of thousandsmillions of dollars worth of assets from the IRS.
He's a tax cheat - pure and simple. and instead of stepping down, the man is giving money to those in change of investigating him.
I for one am watching this story closely... we might be seeing another Duke Cunnigham case here.
421 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:29:42am |
re: #416 Killian Bundy
"Capitalism is evil," says new Michael Moore film
/capitalism paid for his massive girth
He should shut his fat ass up.
422 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:30:04am |
re: #418 Coracle
What part of "he is not a truther" are you finding hard to understand? He's got enough other marks against him that you don't have to rely on made up shit.
Did he sign the document suggesting that the US government was involved in 9/11?
423 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:30:17am |
re: #416 Killian Bundy
I wonder how much Moore is worth? He sure isn't poor, and I don't see him giving all his money away.
424 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:30:38am |
re: #387 Kenneth
Your subsequent comments are cryptic. Could you be kind enough to provide a link to a previous comment if it provides greater clarity?
I stated why I downdinged it.
425 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:31:20am |
how many of these anti american anti semitic creeps do we have to have with direct connections to the zero do we have to have before we see that none of this is a accident?
i for one think we have more than passed the number.
426 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:31:35am |
re: #421 TheMatrix31
He should shut his fat ass up.
It is not so much his ass that worries me. It's his mouth, good grief, the stuff that comes out of there would be better off coming out of the other end of the GI tract.
427 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:31:40am |
re: #422 shanec99
Go look back through the last half dozen Van Jones threads here. Go see if you can find anywhere aside from truther sites that claim he did or any other statement truther he made.
428 | bbuddha Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:31:52am |
re: #418 Coracle
It isn't made up shit. There is enough to have made it a question.
429 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:33:14am |
re: #427 Coracle
Go look back through the last half dozen Van Jones threads here. Go see if you can find anywhere aside from truther sites that claim he did or any other statement truther he made.
Is his signiture on their documents supporting their allegation?
430 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:33:32am |
re: #425 yochanan
updinged for making me feel less alone. I, as did many others, did TONS of research starting during the primaries. I've been feeling like the crazy aunt in the attic - except my husband is now begining to come around.
431 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:33:45am |
It is made up shit, sourced only by truther sites, and an idiotic distraction from the other flaws that have real credibility.
432 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:35:35am |
re: #429 shanec99
Is his signiture on their documents supporting their allegation?
Yes. The problem is the Troofers lie - consistently. We know of one person who NEVER signed it (Rachel Ehrenfeld) and another who said what he signed was not what was published.
We don't know what really happened with Jones.
433 | FrogMarch Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:35:59am |
re: #420 shanec99
I for one am watching this story closely... we might be seeing another Duke Cunnigham case here.
"Democrats are standing behind their chairman -- after the latest revelations, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi reaffirmed her support."
Rangel has a (D) behind his name.
435 | lincolntf Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:36:43am |
Morning all.
Thrilled to see that reason has prevailed and the kook has stepped down.
By the way, does anyone know if "Quint" has plans for Labor Day weekend?
437 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:37:52am |
re: #434 shanec99
[Link: gatewaypundit.blogspot.com...]
Is gateway pundit a truther site?See link.
Gateway pundit takes the word of a truther site. Credibiity = Zero.
438 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:39:00am |
re: #437 Coracle
Gateway pundit takes the word of a truther site. Credibiity = Zero.
and what about the weekly standard?
They lie too?
439 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:39:25am |
re: #438 shanec99
and what about the weekly standard?
They lie too?
They take their information from the same source. Yes.
440 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:39:36am |
the zero's membership in the uber liberal chicagostan university chatting class is well know and sadly I have meet way to many of them because I often hang at a coffee house in Evanston to do my woodcuts. So nothing he is doing is a surprise to me the anti Americanism, anti semitism is standard fair for this crowd.
442 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:41:24am |
re: #437 Coracle
Be careful what you quote- I don't think that link is welcome, and you may get deleted. When in doubt, reply function is your friend.
443 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:41:55am |
re: #439 Coracle
They take their information from the same source. Yes.
how about the midwest conservative journal?
[Link: themcj.com...]
they are truthers too?
444 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:41:58am |
re: #400 Kenneth
A blogger elsewhere pointed out that Bill Clinton appointed a communist to a high level post in his administration, but dumped him/her the moment the communist affiliation was pointed out. Obama did the same with Van Jones, but refused to dump him until the story built to the point where it became obvious that Jones was becoming a liability.
Krauthammer has this correct: Obama really thought the last election was a mandate for radical leftward change. In that context, putting Van Jones on the team made perfect sense.
445 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:42:00am |
re: #438 shanec99
Do you think truthers are a credible source?
446 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:42:08am |
re: #442 Sharmuta
Be careful what you quote- I don't think that link is welcome, and you may get deleted. When in doubt, reply function is your friend.
I shall try to remember.
450 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:43:40am |
re: #443 shanec99
Come on, shane.They source gateway. It's the same trail of stink to the same untrustworthy source. The idiotic accusation is all built on a loon-right and unnecessary house of cards.
451 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:44:03am |
re: #445 Sharmuta
Do you think truthers are a credible source?
Sharm... no I don't, but I believe that they are trying to make themselves credible by highlighting who their supporters are.
452 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:44:28am |
Sharm, is that site in general not allowed anymore? Or is it just that specific article.
453 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:44:32am |
re: #451 shanec99
They can't make themselves credible- they're truthers.
454 | Doubleview Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:45:44am |
One of the most emailed stories from the NY Times today is an editorial about Obama's pending school speech. While I am personally not opposed to the speech, the editorial contained this comment:
"There is, of course, nothing socialist in any of Mr. Obama’s policies"
[Link: www.nytimes.com...]
Am I missing something?
455 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:45:58am |
re: #453 Sharmuta
They can't make themselves credible- they're truthers.
My buddy called me the other day because he wanted help in fighting one. I told him "Dude, it's not even worth trying."
456 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:46:03am |
re: #444 quickjustice
Krauthammer has this correct: Obama really thought the last election was a mandate for radical leftward change.
One of the few times I've disagreed with Krauthammer. Obama had a lot of people convinced he would govern from the center - he is not stupid and knows perfectly well this is not a far left wing country. He would never have been elected had he been clear about his true agenda.
457 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:46:15am |
re: #450 Coracle
how about the American spectator?
[Link: spectator.org...]
458 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:46:20am |
re: #452 TheMatrix31
I don't know- perhaps just the article?
459 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:46:57am |
re: #444 quickjustice
slick Willie really did try to govern from the center so I really think in his case that a commie would slip by would be a real accident.
the zero just has so many connections to the radical left, anti American crowd, anti semitic crowd that it really says a lot about him. and his social contacts with in the uber liberal university chatting class.
460 | Izzyboy Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:47:20am |
re: #457 shanec99
It links to the same gatewaypundit article...
461 | Kenneth Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:47:24am |
re: #424 Sharmuta
Your explanation makes no sense to me. I'm not saying I disagree with your argument, I can't even see what your argument is.
463 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:48:29am |
re: #457 shanec99
how about the American spectator?
[Link: spectator.org...]
Shane, This is really tiring. They source Gateway as well. You can believe the craziness as much as you want. It doesn't make you right.
465 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:48:35am |
re: #444 quickjustice
A blogger elsewhere pointed out that Bill Clinton appointed a communist to a high level post in his administration, but dumped him/her the moment the communist affiliation was pointed out.
I don't know if she had any commie affiliation, but I remember Lani want''s-her-name? - Ganier? getting dumped in about a nanosecond after the WSJ dubbed her the 'Quota Queen'.
466 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:49:29am |
re: #460 Izzyboy
It links to the same gatewaypundit article...
Are you saying that a respected organization like the American spectator (home to Mark Levin etc) is lying about Van Jones being a truther?
Seems every person who calls him a Truther is a liar, even the most credible sources.
467 | yochanan Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:49:44am |
a broken clock is right twice a day the guy admits to signing the thing
reminds me of the zero's 20 years at the rev wrights hate group
468 | bbuddha Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:50:49am |
re: #466 shanec99
I happen to agree that the possibility at least exists but really, give it up. At this point many people seem uber invested in the view that he isn't a truther and that they lied to say he was.
469 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:51:33am |
re: #466 shanec99
Are you saying that a respected organization like the American spectator (home to Mark Levin etc) is lying about Van Jones being a truther?
Seems every person who calls him a Truther is a liar, even the most credible sources.
Every person who calls him a truther is citing the truther organization as their root source. They are either lying themselves, not checking sources, or deciing that a lying organization is most likely telling the truth when it serves their purposes. Any of those reasons is utter crap, and especially "respectable" organizations should goddamn know better.
471 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:52:21am |
re: #457 shanec99
how about the American spectator?
[Link: spectator.org...]
Shane..Dial it back.. It really doesn't matter any more...Van Jones is out and circular logic doesn't advance your point...
It's over...
472 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:52:41am |
re: #470 shanec99
Another crackpot site Charles doesn't want linked at LGF.
473 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:52:42am |
re: #470 shanec99
That is a hate site, and a link to that will get your comment deleted.
475 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:53:43am |
re: #473 Coracle
Where have you been the last few days? Look back over the last several Jone related threads all your "arguments" have been dealt with over and over and over again.
476 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:53:46am |
re: #470 shanec99
I downdinged you for linking to that site. Charles has EXPLICITLY said not to.
477 | Cannadian Club Akbar Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:54:06am |
We need a " take back" button for when we post something we might not know shouldn't be posted, like links.
478 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:54:37am |
re: #473 Coracle
That is a hate site, and a link to that will get your comment deleted.
American spectator is a hate site?
What did they do?
Was I out of America that long?
479 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:55:03am |
re: #470 shanec99
Well hell! link to a wacked out site to advance your point...
That makes all the difference in the world...
480 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:55:21am |
Yeah, a minute long edit window would be cool, or something like that.
481 | lawhawk Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:55:38am |
re: #349 iceweasel
AM-- totally agree. You know I'm way on the left but my issue with Jones has always been the connection with pseudo-science. That bothered me a hell of a lot, and I would have loved to see him bounced for that, or for any legit reason-- just not as the result of this made up witch-hunt.
It's interesting that while much of the left derides the right for its anti-intellectualism (see creationism), the left itself has plenty of crank science to contend with. It's just wrapped up in the veneer of intellectualism.
Good riddance to bad rubbish. Jones was the wrong choice for the wrong position, but he still managed to fit in perfectly with the tenor of this Administration.
On an unrelated note, it looks like British PM Gordon Brown has a serious Libya problem...
482 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:55:50am |
re: #476 wahabicorridor
What did american spectator do or say?
483 | Izzyboy Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:55:59am |
re: #470 shanec99
If you believe that the H1N1 vaccine is made to kill people and that the Evil Zionists are PLANNING WORLD DOMINATION, then yes, that is a legit site.
484 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:56:29am |
re: #478 shanec99
American spectator is a hate site?
What did they do?
Was I out of America that long?
rense. Which you linked to twice.
485 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:56:35am |
re: #483 Izzyboy
If you believe that the H1N1 vaccine is made to kill people and that the Evil Zionists are PLANNING WORLD DOMINATION, then yes, that is a legit site.
When did they say that?
488 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:57:47am |
re: #482 shanec99
What did american spectator do or say?
I referred to your comment at #470. Pay attention.
489 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:57:48am |
rense... I linked to as one of the non-gateway pundit site that said he was involved with them in calling for an investigation.
490 | lawhawk Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:58:39am |
re: #450 Coracle
Come on, shane.They source gateway. It's the same trail of stink to the same untrustworthy source. The idiotic accusation is all built on a loon-right and unnecessary house of cards.
The troofer stuff is an open question (though it is persuasive that the same people who claimed that they were misled by the troofers were still posting conspiracy crap on those same sites), but his unabashed leftist nonsense - the self-declared communist affiliation, the adulation and support of cop-killer Mumia Abu Jamal, and the connections to the crank science outfit that Charles highlighted a few weeks back was more than enough to send Jones packing.
491 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:58:42am |
Never heard of that site but went to the front page...
WTF? Was that thing designed in 1994 or something?
492 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:58:50am |
re: #489 shanec99
rense... I linked to as one of the non-gateway pundit site that said he was involved with them in calling for an investigation.
Yes. And rense has been explicity fingered here by Charles multiple times as a hate site. It has zero to negative credibility.
493 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:59:52am |
re: #492 Coracle
Yes. And rense has been explicity fingered here by Charles multiple times as a hate site. It has zero to negative credibility.
Woah, explicitly fingered.
/diiirty
494 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 6:59:59am |
re: #481 lawhawk
hey, lawhawk, I left a question for you an you Van Jones thread.
Re: Gord - I doubt Blair would have been different. I killed an investigation into an aircraft scheme under pressure from the Saudis.
495 | FrogMarch Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:01:20am |
re: #481 lawhawk
hmm - this is an interesting Van Jones quote:
"The bombs the government drops in Iraq are the bombs that blew up in New York City,"-- said Van Jones
496 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:01:46am |
The left wingers say he supported them, respected right of center publications cite their statements and you are saying that I should ignore this?
If I am, wrong forgive me, I never knew rense was a hate site, I thought it was just a run of the mill left wing site like Kos.
497 | Bobblehead Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:01:54am |
It's kinda funny that most of the country's major school systems won't be in session on the day 0 gives his big pep talk to the "schoochildren"
498 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:03:02am |
re: #481 lawhawk
It's interesting that while much of the left derides the right for its anti-intellectualism (see creationism), the left itself has plenty of crank science to contend with. It's just wrapped up in the veneer of intellectualism.
Good riddance to bad rubbish. Jones was the wrong choice for the wrong position, but he still managed to fit in perfectly with the tenor of this Administration.
On an unrelated note, it looks like British PM Gordon Brown has a serious Libya problem...
Hiya, Lizard Nation!
Hiya, lawhawk!
Gord doesn't just have a 'serious problem with Libya' - he has a very serious problee with the British people, who have seen through his spin, lies and obfuscations by now.
Gord and his fellow NuLabbers are in it so deeply, there is no hope for them at all come the election.
499 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:03:11am |
re: #495 FrogMarch
That link doesn't go to that quote. Can you post another?
501 | Last Mohican Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:03:38am |
re: #496 shanec99
Rense is serious, gutter-level racist hatred. Really, really bad scene.
But if you didn't know that, then you have my full forgiveness. We all post links without fully realizing what we're linking to sometimes.
503 | Bobblehead Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:04:32am |
re: #498 yma o hyd
Hiya, Lizard Nation!
Hiya, lawhawk!
Gord doesn't just have a 'serious problem with Libya' - he has a very serious problee with the British people, who have seen through his spin, lies and obfuscations by now.
Gord and his fellow NuLabbers are in it so deeply, there is no hope for them at all come the election.
I saw that story in "The Telegraph" last night. What a sorted, disgusting mess.
504 | FrogMarch Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:04:33am |
re: #499 Coracle
That link doesn't go to that quote. Can you post another?
The quote is in that link. (4th paragraph down)
505 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:05:06am |
re: #501 Last Mohican
Rense is serious, gutter-level racist hatred. Really, really bad scene.
But if you didn't know that, then you have my full forgiveness. We all post links without fully realizing what we're linking to sometimes.
I simple googled Van Jones and that was one of the 100 or so sites that came up linking him to thr truthers back in 2002.
506 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:05:07am |
re: #494 wahabicorridor
hey, lawhawk, I left a question for you an you Van Jones thread.
Re: Gord - I doubt Blair would have been different. I killed an investigation into an aircraft scheme under pressure from the Saudis.
Hiya, {wahabicorridor}!
That wasn't just an investigation - that was a proper, heavy-duty investigation by the Serious Fraud Squad.
Blair interfered in the judicial process.
507 | lawhawk Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:05:37am |
re: #492 Coracle
Rense is a hate site. It has little credibility, but if you want to study fever swamps, you're not going to check out Tavern on the Green; you're going to look at those fever swamps. I can recall writing a law review article about hate speech online. The only way to conduct my research was to check out those hate sites - stormfront, ihr, and all the rest, in addition to sites that are constantly checking on them like the splc or the fbi. It was necessary to check those sites to not only note their content, but to point out how they did what they did to spread their hate and venom while avoiding direct legal ramifications in the US.
508 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:05:48am |
And here is the LFG prayer list for this week.
Lizard Prayer List 8/30/09
Prayers for thanks, praise, comfort, strength, healing, and hope
Please send updates to prayerlist96@yahoo.com
Seeking Updates
Many thanks to Ben Z and Cap'n Doc for starting this.
Part 1 of 3:
Community issues:
Blessing and protection over all of us during these times.
Our government
Our troops
Israel
Georgia/Ossetia
Gilad Schalit, for his release.
The contractors still held hostage
Brian at Snapped Shot: for justice
The Iranian “dissidents”
Thanksgivings
Uncle Rancher: 17-year-old nephew had treatment for melanoma
Afrocity Brown: outpatient surgery went very well
bbuddha: mother-in-law doing much better
HoosierHoops – son Jordon is home from his deployement with the Marines. Semper Fi, Jordon from LGF with our heartfelt thanks for your service
Vxbush: health issues diagnosed
Wolfie: nephew (USAR-spec ops) got home from Iraq a couple of months ago safe and sound, and he and his wife are expecting their second child.
eschew_obfuscation: family’s health and happiness
Empire1: out of the hospital after suffering a stroke, practically fully recovered
Loppyd: future plans
Irish Rose – Son doing ok and out of danger from illness; automobile problems resolved.
MNSnowlizard - No need for further heart surgery, prayers for her and her family’s good health
Fluffy Bunny – tumor turned out to be benign!
RememberSekhmet – got a job!
Floral Giraffe - Mother just had successful pacemaker inplanted.
Fat Bastard Vegetarian – Mother’s cancer much improved
509 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:05:51am |
re: #504 FrogMarch
The quote is in that link. (4th paragraph down)
Nope. The only use of "bomb" on the page you linked to was in a side scroling headline of "60 Said Killed in NATO Bombing; US Aid Monies May support Taliban Activities"
510 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:06:30am |
re: #503 Bobblehead
I saw that story in "The Telegraph" last night. What a sorted, disgusting mess.
It truly is - and you can bet your bottom dollar that the victims of the IRA terrorists won't forget hs acts, come the election!
511 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:07:12am |
Part 2 of 3 09/06/09
Health issues:
Mikeymom: husband’s cousin's hubby has entered hospital for last time
loppyd: Brother’s knee injury and future m-i-l’s broken hip.
vagabond trader: friend’s mother fighting cancer
(cont'd)
littleoldlady: talloldman
Pietr: Aunt Doris in hospital with poor prognosis; b-i-l Roscoe undergoing Chemotherapy
J.D.: diagnosed friend's son as having a Glioma
Doppelganglander: Passing of sister, best friend Cindy diagnosed with MS
NY Nana: son-in-law’s mum, recovering from amputation
CapeCoddah: boss John R
Iron Fist: diabetes not improving
yma o hyd: glaucoma; may need surgery; arthritis
ArmyWife: FIL just diagnosed with leukemia; good friend’s daughter dealing with issues.
UberInfidel67 and other Lizards who are trying to quit smoking
Chicago Blonde: friend battling cancer
Macker: health issues and treatment
Hoppes: has sick children, lost her MIL, and is very stressed
UberInfidel67: brother’s health after polyps removal
Aussiemagpie: children with health issues
Walter Cronanty: son with recurrence of leukemia & recovering from bone marrow transplant.
logboy: recovery from injuries received in combat in Iraq
gettinby: sister diagnosed with Sjogren’s Syndrome
Pingjockey – cancer down by voice box.
tfc3rid: gf's 89 year old grandmother (suffered a large stroke and is in rehab) and her uncle who is suffering from throat cancer; and continued prayers for dad who has MS
twincitiesgirl: husband fighting cancer
Cato the elder: health issues
Josephine: daughter diagnosed with rare, chronic illness
jamsler: sister, just diagnosed with thyroid cancer; father, getting biopsy of a possible malignancy in his throat.
CoCo: mother paralyzed (due to strokes) and is now having new health problems
gop_patriot: friend’s 8-year-old son starting chemo
Pingjockey: friend Bob with a carcinoma, recovering from surgery
jorline: scleritis (eye disease), rheumatoid arthritis; father who has colon cancer
realwest: metastasizing prostate cancer; mom Type II diabetes
AKAK: Parkinson’s diagnosis confirmed
eaglewingz08: intestinal cancer; has bad case of Grave’s disease, thyroid disorder
Noamsayin: niece and dad battling cancer
Truck Monkey: Brady (11-year-old with brain cancer who is on the football team he coaches)
Shaky Louie: chronic pancriatitis, and an (as yet) undiagnosed liver problem.
newsjunkie_ky: Step-Dad
Sarah: dad (cancer);
Zonie: cancer and renal failure
kcladderman: father’s throat cancer; just finisher second round of radiation
Clutch: 82-year-old mom’s recovery from eye surgery
BBev: wife’s illness and great pain, having gone from bad to worse
Kenneth: beloved daughter "M" serious chronic illness.
Cartman: liver and other health problems
Irene NYC: mom’s cancer
Outsidephilly – recovering from BAD flu and pneumonia
Jamgarr – for good outcome of cancer surgery
Pbird – father has prostate cancer
512 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:07:47am |
Lizard Prayer List, cont’d: 09/06/09
Family, friend, and life situations:
Kawfytawk: the Springle family, who lost their father in Iraq.
Dustyvet: sudden loss of sister
loppyd: friend’s personal problems
Kawfytawk: caring for father
Teacake: emotional healing
BaseballMom57: husband’s passing; prayers for especially for their children.
ChildofMary: passing of husband, ElderZionist
US Beast: passing of mother
Vxbush: Lesion on Liver near vein, MRI scheduled; and one Lizard friend dealing with big issues
Army Green since '92: post has lost three soldiers in Afghanistan;
yma o hyd: death of dear friend Annie; ease the grief of friend who lost her husband of 59 years
Taqiyyotomist: strength in difficult times
FBV: that the unknowns find fulfillment
Vxbush: daughter’s financial issues
Yochanan: son in IDF
Bcgirl: sponsored child, Alia in Egypt
Wyatt Earp: Uncle Joe; prostate cancer returned
West Texas: brother’s decision
Victor_yugo: job
BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey: mom home from the hospital but may be regressing
A Kiwi Infidel: Natasha and her husband mourning the loss of the younger child.
MandyManners: Mother seriously ill and in hospital.
Cast Iron Magnolia: nephew, David, who's a Marine serving in Iraq
HHC 2-2 SCR: for those we lost and their family and friends and for thanks for those that are finally back and one for the safety of those still waiting to return.
lightsout: to make a wise decision
BeerDrinking VictoryMonkey: strength to overcome a personal issue, and for wisdom in discerning another one
Flynmudd: son deployed to Middle East
x-wing: son diagnosed with Asperger’s (mild autism)
Mars Needs Neocons: job
jcm: new 7th month foster daughter (previous foster daughter went to live with her grandma)
Josephine: painful loss
Jammiewearingfool: sister’s passing
David Simon: mom (Alzheimer's)
Intrepid: Mom has Alzheimer's and Intrepid is caretaker
conservgirl: atheist SPM, that he finds the Lord
Coz: Brother in law and wife in horrible motorcycle accident; wife passed away.
Pvt Bin Jammin – BIL’s son has Liver Cancer
soxfan4life – Uncle had heart attack, undergoing by-pass surgery
3 wood – Dana, friend of 3 wood and family, passed of cancer and is now in the arms of the Lord. Please pray for her 2 small children and husband.
ChristheProfessor – lost his brother to cancer recently.
Floral Giraffe – Uncle passed away this past week
Mamacares – health issues for a family member
Conservatisimnow – kidney stones and other related matters.
Bbhudda – Mother-in Law passed away recently.
Hutchip – son in US Army, just shipped out to the Middle East where he’ll be in Harm’s way
Knitwit – calm for a friend who is experiencing some turbulence.
Irish Rose – help for healing old emotional wound
Lizards with family issues
Irish Rose: One of Top 5 candidates for a GREAT job!
Noraono: colleagues laid off in building industry
antiislamist: in need of prayers
lone_wolf_in_illinois: friends and family in Israel
Dianna: - mother- best possible outcome is hoped for.
GotC: strength for kids and her dealing with EH.
Danger close: general
zulubaby, Carl in Jerusalem, Mr Pol, Golden Jerusalem, basically all the minion in eretz Yisrael
Noam Saying: comfort for a lost brother
Buckeye Abroad: in the belly of the beast of Eurabia
nonic: general
yank in EU: general
MdiM: general
.
In Memoriam
Dublin(CA)Dude
USMC 1968
ElderZion
Obi Wan
All our Troops who have died protecting our Freedom and their families.
513 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:09:17am |
re: #505 shanec99
I simple googled Van Jones and that was one of the 100 or so sites that came up linking him to thr truthers back in 2002.
You need to be A LOT more disciplened about how to handle your research results.
514 | FrogMarch Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:09:25am |
re: #509 Coracle
Nope. The only use of "bomb" on the page you linked to was in a side scroling headline of "60 Said Killed in NATO Bombing; US Aid Monies May support Taliban Activities"
The link works for me. I'm not sure what link you are clicking on.
There are no "scrolling" headlines on the link I used.
Try again here:
[Link: www.indybay.org...]
515 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:10:03am |
Some more light ahs now been shed on that mysterious Russian ship which went missing ... and was then found again by the Russian Navy:
Missing channel pirate ship carried Russian arms for Iran
From that link:
'A CARGO ship that vanished in the Channel was carrying arms to Iran and was being tracked by Mossad, the Israeli security service, according to sources in both Russia and Israel.
The Arctic Sea, officially carrying a cargo of timber worth £1.3m, disappeared en route from Finland to Algeria on July 24. It was recovered off west Africa on August 17 when eight alleged hijackers were arrested. The Kremlin has consistently denied that the vessel was carrying a secret cargo. It claims the ship was hijacked by criminals who demanded a £1m ransom.
The official version was challenged by sources in Tel Aviv and Moscow who claimed the ship had been loaded with S-300 missiles, Russia’s most advanced anti-aircraft weapon, while undergoing repairs in the Russian port of Kaliningrad.
Mossad, which closely monitors arms supplies to Iran, is said to have tipped off the Russian government that the shipment had been sold by former military officers linked to the underworld. '
RTWT - of course, some Jew Haters now say that Mossad did it all along ...
516 | Ojoe Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:10:29am |
517 | Last Mohican Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:11:02am |
Re: Van Jones
I just perused the comments over at some of the Moronic Left sites like HuffPo and Kos. Needless to say, they're really pissed off about the whole thing.
What worries me is that a lot of their fuming is directed at Glenn Beck. In fact, HuffPo's headline for the story is "Glenn Beck Gets First Scalp: Van Jones Resigns." By doing this, they're just helping to legitimize Beck as the champion of the anti-Obama resistance. The narrative that's going to develop on the right will be that the big Republican political names like McCain, Giuliani, Romney, etc. were powerless to stop the Obama juggernaut of radicalization, but Beck managed to win a battle.
This worries me.
518 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:11:11am |
re: #506 yma o hyd
Hiya, {wahabicorridor}!
That wasn't just an investigation - that was a proper, heavy-duty investigation by the Serious Fraud Squad.
Blair interfered in the judicial process.
Hiya yma!
I'm surprised the British papers haven't referred back to that just to highlight the perfidy of NuLab. Did you see that skank Lauren Booth's piece today in the Daily Mail about Diana being knocked off to protect the arms trade?
519 | lawhawk Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:11:36am |
re: #494 wahabicorridor
What was the question. I don't see it.
520 | SurferDoc Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:11:51am |
re: #516 Ojoe
Towercam: The dawn over the San Gabriel Mountains of California, with much smoke from fires.
Good morning all.
Good morning, Joe. Great pic.
521 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:12:19am |
re: #513 wahabicorridor
You need to be A LOT more disciplened about how to handle your research results.
Point taken. Thank you.
522 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:12:36am |
re: #517 Last Mohican
Re: Van Jones
I just perused the comments over at some of the Moronic Left sites like HuffPo and Kos. Needless to say, they're really pissed off about the whole thing.
What worries me is that a lot of their fuming is directed at Glenn Beck. In fact, HuffPo's headline for the story is "Glenn Beck Gets First Scalp: Van Jones Resigns." By doing this, they're just helping to legitimize Beck as the champion of the anti-Obama resistance. The narrative that's going to develop on the right will be that the big Republican political names like McCain, Giuliani, Romney, etc. were powerless to stop the Obama juggernaut of radicalization, but Beck managed to win a battle.
This worries me.
That could very well be the case, and I hope that it's not. I personally think that the overall spotlight is going to be on yet another appointee having to go by the wayside.
523 | Cato Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:13:01am |
re: #512 wahabicorridor
Again, thank you for this. Like my temple, this sort of thing makes one feel they are part of a community.
524 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:13:04am |
re: #516 Ojoe
Towercam: The dawn over the San Gabriel Mountains of California, with much smoke from fires.
Good morning all.
Top of the morning to you, Ojoe!
Thanks for this and all the other towercam links you post - I really enjoy seeing them!
525 | Bobblehead Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:13:10am |
re: #516 Ojoe
Towercam: The dawn over the San Gabriel Mountains of California, with much smoke from fires.
Good morning all.
It gives the feeling of the observatory floating on its own island over an ocean of smoke,
526 | Ojoe Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:13:38am |
re: #520 SurferDoc
Good morning.
I remember as a school kid in the 1950s watching the same mountains on fire just like this.
527 | Coracle Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:13:50am |
re: #514 FrogMarch
I see the problem. For some reason, when I click on the link, it redirects me to the front page of the site.
528 | SurferDoc Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:15:42am |
re: #526 Ojoe
Good morning.
I remember as a school kid in the 1950s watching the same mountains on fire just like this.
I only got here in the 70's but I remember many fires. Heck, the Cajon Pass burns every other year!
529 | Last Mohican Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:15:46am |
re: #513 wahabicorridor
You need to be A LOT more disciplened about how to handle your research results.
It was either an honest mistake, or a banworthy attempt to sneak a sickening hate site into the LGF discussion. I don't know shanec99, and I haven't researched his or her previous comments, so I'm more than willing to accept that it was the former.
We're all just yapping here, and I wouldn't like it if everything we said had to be thoroughly vetted before posting. An innocently unaware link to rense should be deleted, an apology for its posting should be offered, and the whole thing should be written off as an educational experience for the poster.
530 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:15:49am |
re: #515 yma o hyd
Mossad, which closely monitors arms supplies to Iran, is said to have tipped off the Russian government that the shipment had been sold by former military officers linked to the underworld. '
Oh, have I got a book for you!
It was recommended to me by a friend who is a nuclear physicist and does military work that he can't talk about.
531 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:16:01am |
re: #518 wahabicorridor
Hiya yma!
I'm surprised the British papers haven't referred back to that just to highlight the perfidy of NuLab. Did you see that skank Lauren Booth's piece today in the Daily Mail about Diana being knocked off to protect the arms trade?
Nooo!
That Booth woman is a real leftie moron, I'm surprised she's been given room in the Mail.
I've not been on the interweb since very early today: our four-legged holiday visitor has come to stay for another week! We just got back from our afternoon jaunt.
532 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:16:41am |
re: #519 lawhawk
What was the question. I don't see it.
Simply if all this 'czar' business is at all constitutional.
533 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:18:05am |
re: #530 wahabicorridor
Oh, have I got a book for you!
It was recommended to me by a friend who is a nuclear physicist and does military work that he can't talk about.
Thanks - excellent!
I see some are selling it for $0.01 - now thats a deal I cannot resist!
535 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:19:56am |
So I leave here (work) at 11 p.m. last night, and as I pull inot the driveway at just about midnight hear the breaking news re: Van Jones. I have to give kudos to the Obama team for
A) cutting their losses instead of stubbornly hanging on to him
B) their impeccable timing (Saturday/Sunday midnight ,,,Holiday weekend). By the time Tuesday comes along this is old news. Todays talking head shows will have to discuss it, but viewership is way down this morning for the last weekend (long) of the summer
I doubt much of America will even notice
RAHM ,,, YOU MAGNIFICENT BASTARD (grudgingly)
536 | lawhawk Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:20:26am |
re: #517 Last Mohican
re: #532 wahabicorridor
Good question. There's nothing that prevents a President from seeking counsel outside of government. Presidents have had versions of kitchen cabinets for some time, some using more official channels (cabinet w/confirmation) than others. As government has gotten larger and more complex, the need for advisers has grown, but presidents often seek counsel from those outside government among friends and like-minded folks.
The problem with Obama isn't that he's seeking czars to provide policy recommendations. It's that he's doing so to the exclusion of filling positions requiring confirmation by the US Senate. He's doing so to avoid further scrutiny. He's doing so because he's been incapable of filling confirmation-necessary positions because of an incompetent vetting process.
That's the real problem.
537 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:20:57am |
re: #517 Last Mohican
Re: Van Jones
I just perused the comments over at some of the Moronic Left sites like HuffPo and Kos. Needless to say, they're really pissed off about the whole thing.
What worries me is that a lot of their fuming is directed at Glenn Beck. In fact, HuffPo's headline for the story is "Glenn Beck Gets First Scalp: Van Jones Resigns." By doing this, they're just helping to legitimize Beck as the champion of the anti-Obama resistance. The narrative that's going to develop on the right will be that the big Republican political names like McCain, Giuliani, Romney, etc. were powerless to stop the Obama juggernaut of radicalization, but Beck managed to win a battle.
This worries me.
They can cry me a river. Besides which, they should be going after Malkin. She's done tons of resarch herself.
538 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:21:31am |
re: #529 Last Mohican
Look up everything I have ever posted, you will find no tolerance of racial haterd. But if after you complete a full search of everytihg I have posted you believe I should not be a poster here, then I will ask that my account be closed.
I simply linked to sites that identified Van Jones as a supporter of the Truther movement, I did not know that rense was a racist site.
Do you think a Jamaican would support a racist site?
Look at my Icon.
539 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:24:21am |
re: #536 lawhawk
It's that he's doing so to the exclusion of filling positions requiring confirmation by the US Senate. He's doing so to avoid further scrutiny. He's doing so because he's been incapable of filling confirmation-necessary positions because of an incompetent vetting process.
Well, I think that in many of the czars, the vetting is just fine - they know EXACTLY what they're getting and they want to avoid Congressional oversight - fuck the 'checks and balances'.
540 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:25:15am |
re: #538 shanec99
Do you think a Jamaican would support a racist site?
Look at my Icon.
No,,, but can I have a Red Stripe, Mon!?!?!
//
541 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:25:49am |
re: #540 sattv4u2
Do you think a Jamaican would support a racist site?
Look at my Icon.No,,, but can I have a Red Stripe, Mon!?!?!
//
lol
542 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:26:20am |
re: #538 shanec99
Do you think a Jamaican would support a racist site?
Look at my Icon.
No. And I'll take a Pain Killer w/ Pusser's please.
:D
543 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:27:58am |
While looking up that Bootj-woman-story wahabicorridor mentioned above, I cam across this:
How Labour plotted to smear daughter of new army chief... whose 'crime' was to work for Cameron
From that link:
'A Labour plot to smear the new head of the Army, General Sir David Richards, because of his daughter’s ‘crime’ of working for David Cameron was exposed last night.
The threat to target the General, who took up his new job just nine days ago, was one of the real reasons that Labour MP Eric Joyce resigned as an aide to Defence Secretary Bob Ainsworth last week.'
That is one more example of how Gord's cronies in NuLab work: smear and innuendos, to diminish the stanading and effectiveness of any higher official who doesn't toe NuLAb's line.
Read the lot to see how this scum works!
(Cameron, btw, is of course the leader of the Tory party - and will be our next Prime Minister)
544 | FrogMarch Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:29:47am |
Crazy things people believe about George W Bush
I remember.
545 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:31:21am |
re: #543 yma o hyd
Cameron, btw, is of course the leader of the Tory party - and will be our next Prime Minister
I don't like much of what I've seen about Cameron. he goes about like his shit don't stink. Like when he went 'green' and ride a bike to the HOC - with his car cruising along behind him..
546 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:31:52am |
Charles,
Please review everything I have posted since I have been a member for more than two years. Please advise me if I have ever made a racially insensitive remark.
If anyone here can find anything I have said that is racist, please advise me. I am not now, nor have I ever been a racist. I was simply going down a list of sites that said Van Jones was a truther. I never knew that rense was a racist, or I would not have cited it.
If that eplanation is not satisfactory, and reasonable people cannot see the truth for what it is, then perhaps I have no alternative than to say goodbye. I will not bring disrepute on this site, nor will I allow the fact that I used a google search to provide evidence of something that is widely reported in the media to bring this site into disreputre.
Shane C
547 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:32:30am |
re: #543 yma o hyd
I saw that - laughed out loud. Remember a few months ago when two people had to resign because they found emails outlining a plan to smear somebody with sexual innuendo or something.
You guys need another Guy Fawkes or something.
548 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:33:25am |
re: #546 shanec99
Calm down. You've been suitably spanked and no one is accusing you of any moral lapses.
549 | John Neverbend Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:33:52am |
re: #16 zombie
One of the issues that really disgusted me about Van Jones which as far as I could tell got ZERO mention in this recent brouhaha was how rabidly anti-Israel he was..
This is good, because there's then no reason that Jones or his supporters will blame the "Israel/Zionist lobby". On the other hand it's bad that he holds those views in the first place.
550 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:33:57am |
re: #546 shanec99
Shane,
I'm sure Charles doesn't need to. If you ever had posted something insensitive, he would have deleted it at the time. If you were a serial offender, he would have deleted you at he time!
551 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:34:52am |
re: #545 Diego
I don't like much of what I've seen about Cameron. he goes about like his shit don't stink. Like when he went 'green' and ride a bike to the HOC - with his car cruising along behind him..
Oh, he's a complete snot. But he's gonna get some sympathy votes because his six yr old son, Ivan, recently died of a chronic illness.
552 | John Neverbend Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:35:15am |
re: #546 shanec99
Charles,
Please review everything I have posted since I have been a member for more than two years. Please advise me if I have ever made a racially insensitive remark.
Shane, you're a real gent.
555 | FrogMarch Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:38:55am |
Penn on "Being a servant to our president"
*Come on Penn, spit it out and stop playing with yer hair.
**He makes a good point.
556 | John Neverbend Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:40:36am |
re: #538 shanec99
Do you think a Jamaican would support a racist site?Look at my Icon.
My wife went to the West Indies. Jamaica? No, she went of her own accord. (Weedy English joke, probably from the 1950s).
557 | shanec99 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:42:35am |
re: #556 John Neverbend
My wife went to the West Indies. Jamaica? No, she went of her own accord. (Weedy English joke, probably from the 1950s).
I can't say that I get the joke.
but yes Jamaica is in the West Indies.
558 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:42:51am |
re: #545 Diego
I don't like much of what I've seen about Cameron. he goes about like his shit don't stink. Like when he went 'green' and ride a bike to the HOC - with his car cruising along behind him..
Aww - thats surely a brilliant reason to vote for five more years with Gord and NuLab!
See - the system here in the UK is different from your in the USA. We know the whole cabinet which will run this country when Cameron wins. There are some real heavyweights in it.
We also know how they perform, having seen them numerous times on the parliamentary broadcasts.
We don't elect a President, who then, weeks or months alter, fills his cabinet with peole who, ahem, didn't pay their taxes or such - we elect the party, thus the current shadow cabinet, and the current party leader who will have his government fully formed once he wins.
We also don't have a transition period - once Gord ahs lost, he's required to move out of 10 Downing Street the enxt day, and Cameron will move in.
He and his cabinet colleagues are already being briefed by the top civil servants in all matters regarding government politics - thats the law.
So it doesn't matter to us if Cameron isn't quite somebody's cup of tea - we know what we'll get, and above all we know whom we desperately want to get rid off!
559 | Hengineer Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:44:35am |
re: #557 shanec99
The joke is a parody of the pronunciation of Jamaica (Didja Make Her?)
560 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:44:49am |
re: #557 shanec99
I can't say that I get the joke.
but yes Jamaica is in the West Indies.
"Jamaica",,,
When someone says
"Did you make her" fast it sounds like "jamaica"
561 | Gang of One Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:45:33am |
Good morning, all. I think I have a hang-over, but I only drank two martinis, and that was in the early evening.
563 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:46:24am |
re: #547 wahabicorridor
I saw that - laughed out loud. Remember a few months ago when two people had to resign because they found emails outlining a plan to smear somebody with sexual innuendo or something.
You guys need another Guy Fawkes or something.
We've got one - he's running the blog that 'outed' these two luvverly 'smearers-for-Gord'!
(Not that he's particularily partial to the conservatives - he roasts them all!)
For a laugh, have a look!
564 | Gang of One Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:47:02am |
re: #561 Gang of One
Good morning, all. I think I have a hang-over, but I only drank two martinis, and that was in the early evening.
Probably not enough fluids during the whole day. Low-level dehydration feels like a H.O.
565 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:47:18am |
566 | Ojoe Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:47:20am |
re: #528 SurferDoc
Now we have a cool Towercam so we can watch from a distance!
567 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:49:07am |
Btw - the papers have been writing about this today:
Does any Lizard use them?
Whaddaya think?
568 | Hengineer Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:50:17am |
re: #564 Gang of One
Probably not enough fluids during the whole day. Low-level dehydration feels like a H.O.
Yep, dry mouth, headache...
Be careful about drinking water first thing. When I've had raging hangovers I could only take a small swig of water at a time, because the water absorbing into the tissue in my mouth/head right when I drink it made my head pound like crazy and had to go lay back down.
569 | SasquatchOnSteroids Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:50:46am |
re: #567 yma o hyd
Btw - the papers have been writing about this today:
Does any Lizard use them?
Whaddaya think?
Fit like a glove, they do.
/no idea
570 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:51:02am |
re: #558 yma o hyd
We don't elect a President, who then, weeks or months alter, fills his cabinet with peole who, ahem, didn't pay their taxes or such - we elect the party, thus the current shadow cabinet, and the current party leader who will have his government fully formed once he wins.
Actually, you could run with one guy and put another in his place once the election is over. There is nothing at all which would stop this. Likewise, you get whomever he chooses for his cabinet, without any say-so whatsoever, and he can change them any time he likes.
In Britain you're only guaranteed which party you're getting, not who will represent it.
571 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:52:34am |
re: #567 yma o hyd
Btw - the papers have been writing about this today:
Does any Lizard use them?
Whaddaya think?
I likey! The new Nike Sandals I bought suck...There is like a tire tread you walk on...Stupid idea...And stupid for me buying them..
572 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:54:25am |
re: #567 yma o hyd
Btw - the papers have been writing about this today:
Does any Lizard use them?
Whaddaya think?
They look very Euroish to me
573 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:54:27am |
re: #571 HoosierHoops
I likey! The new Nike Sandals I bought suck...There is like a tire tread you walk on...Stupid idea...And stupid for me buying them..
No Likey Nike, Mikey?
574 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:55:31am |
575 | Gang of One Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:56:57am |
re: #568 Hengineer
Yep, dry mouth, headache...
Be careful about drinking water first thing. When I've had raging hangovers I could only take a small swig of water at a time, because the water absorbing into the tissue in my mouth/head right when I drink it made my head pound like crazy and had to go lay back down.
Usually I alternate between cocktail and pint of club soda, and I usually drink a lot of clear fluid or green tea during the day. I did not get the best kind of sleep, and I'm feeling all pistons are not firing.
576 | SasquatchOnSteroids Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:56:59am |
577 | wahabicorridor Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:57:30am |
re: #563 yma o hyd
We've got one - he's running the blog that 'outed' these two luvverly 'smearers-for-Gord'!
(Not that he's particularily partial to the conservatives - he roasts them all!)For a laugh, have a look!
Oh, very nice! Here's one of my favorites - The Devil's Kitchen - but I must issue a language warning. Incredibly funny, tho.
578 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:58:24am |
582 | Lincolntf Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:59:51am |
Wow. Just heard that the Patriots traded Richard Seymour to Oakland!
WTF???
583 | John Neverbend Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:59:53am |
re: #570 Diego
Actually, you could run with one guy and put another in his place once the election is over. There is nothing at all which would stop this. Likewise, you get whomever he chooses for his cabinet, without any say-so whatsoever, and he can change them any time he likes.
In Britain you're only guaranteed which party you're getting, not who will represent it.
The party could choose to replace their leader immediately following an election, but I think this is extremely unlikely, and I can't recall that it ever happened. If the leader leads that party to victory, it's much more likely that he or she will stay for a while. It's also true that the prime minister chooses the cabinet, but the members are primarily chosen from the members of parliament in the House of Commons and less commonly from the House of Lords. The person in the Lords will almost certainly have been a political appointee to that house. The effect of this is that the government of the day tends to be made up of people who have had a reasonable track-record in parliamentary politics. Also remember that the Civil Service, even at its highest levels, does not chance with the government, but continues to work with whichever party happens to be in power.
584 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 7:59:58am |
re: #573 sattv4u2
No Likey Nike, Mikey?
No but I bought these wicked bad Nike Sandals which have a flap over made with velcro in Black with Nike scrolled in white on them...Cool looking...They put like a rubber tire tread for your feet...It hurts every time you walk...
Stupid buy..Stupid engineering...Stupid Hoosier...
585 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:01:15am |
re: #570 Diego
Actually, you could run with one guy and put another in his place once the election is over. There is nothing at all which would stop this. Likewise, you get whomever he chooses for his cabinet, without any say-so whatsoever, and he can change them any time he likes.
In Britain you're only guaranteed which party you're getting, not who will represent it.
Yes, well - the Party in question would have to 'rebel' against their duly elected Party leader (who is then Prime Minister) - tehre would have to be a vote of no confidence within the parliamentary party, then an election of the new leader by the whole party (not by all the people, see!) - and he then ought to call a new General Election.
Thats what Gord didn't do, when he and Blair finagled this 'succession' - and we have not forgotten nor forgiven.
It is, after all, not for the electorate to demand a change in the leadership - it is an inner-party decision.
Changing a PM is a very difficult thing to do - and the Tory aprty has had ample time to get rid of Cameron if they think he's not up for it. They have, after all changed their leader a number of times in the last 12 years.
The question is not, is he 'snotty' - which is, amongst other things, a nice NuLAb smear - the question is, will he deliver? And with the people he's got in his cabinet, we think he may just do it.
(No, I don't like all his choices either - but even the worst is miles better than what NuLAb has got!)
587 | SasquatchOnSteroids Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:01:37am |
re: #578 sattv4u2
No offense intended, big (hairy mythical) guy !
None taken at all, "my dish is bigger than yours" guy !
/
588 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:02:04am |
589 | John Neverbend Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:02:06am |
re: #583 John Neverbend
Also remember that the Civil Service, even at its highest levels, does not chance change with the government, but continues to work with whichever party happens to be in power.
590 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:02:48am |
re: #583 John Neverbend
Correct on all points, I was just sayin' :)
591 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:03:03am |
592 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:03:25am |
593 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:03:35am |
re: #571 HoosierHoops
I likey! The new Nike Sandals I bought suck...There is like a tire tread you walk on...Stupid idea...And stupid for me buying them..
Hiya, {HH}!
Hope you're fine, and Winston is having a lovely time!
We're having Bas, Madame's four-legged friend, to stay for one week!
But - have you run in them Five Fingers yet?
594 | Lincolntf Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:04:32am |
Any Pats fans in here? I can't say I like this deal.
For the team or for Seymour who now has to go work for Crazy Al.
596 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:04:55am |
re: #577 wahabicorridor
Oh, very nice! Here's one of my favorites - The Devil's Kitchen - but I must issue a language warning. Incredibly funny, tho.
Nice one!!!
Duly book-marked!
Thanks!
597 | anova Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:06:19am |
Richard Dawkin's new book (The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution) has just been released in the UK.
I wonder what the creationists/IDers will do.
598 | John Neverbend Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:06:29am |
re: #590 Diego
Correct on all points, I was just sayin' :)
The main difference that I can perceive between the US Presidential elections and the UK general election is that it would much more difficult to have a British government headed by a man or woman who was not well known, at least in parliament, and who had very little experience.
599 | John Neverbend Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:07:23am |
re: #597 anova
Richard Dawkin's new book (The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution) has just been released in the UK.
I wonder what the creationists/IDers will do.
1. Wet themselves.
2. Write bad reviews on Amazon.
(in either order).
600 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:07:41am |
re: #589 John Neverbend
Also remember that the Civil Service, even at its highest levels, does not
chancechange with the government, but continues to work with whichever party happens to be in power.
Yep - and as I said above - they are required, by law, in the run-up to a General election, to give the same briefings to the opposition party (thats the Tories right now) as to the Government.
Rumours have it that these top civil servants are pretty impressed with the Tory shadow cabinet, and rate them higher all round than their NuLab opponents in Government.
601 | Lincolntf Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:07:56am |
re: #577 wahabicorridor
I like the post about the hairdresser who itemizes the taxes on customer recepts. That's a great idea, I wish every business owner did that.
602 | SasquatchOnSteroids Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:08:07am |
My oh my
Bank's thumbprint rule irks man born with no arms
TAMPA, Fla.--- A Florida man born without arms says a Tampa bank would not let him cash a check because he couldn't provide a thumbprint.
603 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:09:09am |
re: #587 SasquatchOnSteroids
None taken at all, "my dish is bigger than yours" guy !
/
{blush},,, it shos, huh!
//
604 | John Neverbend Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:09:50am |
re: #600 yma o hyd
Yep - and as I said above - they are required, by law, in the run-up to a General election, to give the same briefings to the opposition party (thats the Tories right now) as to the Government.
Rumours have it that these top civil servants are pretty impressed with the Tory shadow cabinet, and rate them higher all round than their NuLab opponents in Government.
Yes, I used to work for the civil service, as did my uncle and, just after the end of [Link: WWWII,...] my father.
605 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:10:14am |
re: #601 Lincolntf
I like the post about the hairdresser who itemizes the taxes on customer recepts. That's a great idea, I wish every business owner did that.
Yeah - and it makes quite clear how much tax, especially indirect taxes, us Brits are required to shell out for this lot!
606 | SasquatchOnSteroids Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:10:24am |
607 | Silvergirl Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:10:46am |
re: #503 Bobblehead
I saw that story in "The Telegraph" last night. What a sorted, disgusting mess.
Probably more unsorted than sorted. We could also call it sordid.
608 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:10:55am |
re: #594 Lincolntf
Any Pats fans in here? I can't say I like this deal.
For the team or for Seymour who now has to go work for Crazy Al.
knowing the Pats, there's another shoe to be dropped on this! They have their eyes on something
609 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:11:18am |
re: #593 yma o hyd
Hiya, {HH}!
Hope you're fine, and Winston is having a lovely time!
We're having Bas, Madame's four-legged friend, to stay for one week!But - have you run in them Five Fingers yet?
No..I run in black new balance shoes..
Winston is laying at my feet sleeping...
You will not believe this.. But the deep dark secret about Hawaii is that everybody wears Sandals...But you ALWAYS leave them by the door. I don't know how many times my Sandals were ripped off after a party from the pile at the front door.. They do it all the time and if they say they don't Steal they are lying to you..
Hawaiians are Sandal thieves...And they know it...( It's all hush hush)
I never once left a party with a wicked pair of Sandals..*snicker*
610 | John Neverbend Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:11:53am |
re: #604 John Neverbend
Sorry, an unintentional link was produced. I must remember not to type the abbreviated form of World War II.
611 | Silvergirl Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:12:00am |
re: #567 yma o hyd
Btw - the papers have been writing about this today:
Does any Lizard use them?
Whaddaya think?
I don't think I'd like them. I don't even like toe socks.
612 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:12:37am |
re: #604 John Neverbend
Yes, I used to work for the civil service, as did my uncle and, just after the end of [Link: WWWII,...] my father.
Linkie no workie ...!
And its a crying shame how NuLab, starting with Tony B., have devalued what the civil service does, and have further brought in 'special advisers' who are unelected and who get paid extra, from our taxes.
I hope the new Tory broom will do some good work there!
613 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:12:54am |
re: #611 Silvergirl
I don't think I'd like them. I don't even like toe socks.
I gotta clean my screen
I thought you said you didn't like Toe Sucks!
614 | Lincolntf Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:13:10am |
re: #608 sattv4u2
I hope so. Bruschi, Harrison and now Seymour are gone. I assume someone will step up and fill some of those roles, but replacing all three is gonna be tough.
615 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:14:09am |
re: #614 Lincolntf
I hope so. Bruschi, Harrison and now Seymour are gone. I assume someone will step up and fill some of those roles, but replacing all three is gonna be tough.
Seymour has a big cap #, iirc. Something eles must be afoot
616 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:14:28am |
re: #609 HoosierHoops
No..I run in black new balance shoes..
Winston is laying at my feet sleeping...
You will not believe this.. But the deep dark secret about Hawaii is that everybody wears Sandals...But you ALWAYS leave them by the door. I don't know how many times my Sandals were ripped off after a party from the pile at the front door.. They do it all the time and if they say they don't Steal they are lying to you..
Hawaiians are Sandal thieves...And they know it...( It's all hush hush)
I never once left a party with a wicked pair of Sandals..*snicker*
Aww ...!
Remind me to bring the cheapest flip-flops only if I ever get to go to Hawaii!
617 | Silvergirl Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:15:30am |
re: #602 SasquatchOnSteroids
My oh my
Why didn't they let him whip off his sock and use his big toe for a print?
618 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:16:10am |
re: #611 Silvergirl
I don't think I'd like them. I don't even like toe socks.
I dislike toe socks as well!
But I have this inexplicable craving for slightly weird-looking but very functional footwear ... especially shoes I can wear in the park when playing with Madame.
Wellies get sooo boring ...!
619 | Silvergirl Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:17:06am |
re: #613 sattv4u2
I gotta clean my screen
I thought you said you didn't like Toe Sucks!
No. I have to be careful around here. Last night I said I wanted a hand warmer and used a different word. A small ruckus ensued.
620 | SasquatchOnSteroids Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:17:30am |
re: #617 Silvergirl
Why didn't they let him whip off his sock and use his big toe for a print?
Because they have no sole.
621 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:17:52am |
622 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:19:04am |
And now for something completely different!
Early this morning I went into the abck garden to check the temperature (our weather forecast being, ahem, haphazard!).
And on the back wall - I saw two slugs, making love!
I was riveted - got my camera and took loads of piccies.
Once I get them transferred, I'll provide you with the evidence!
623 | Bobblehead Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:19:11am |
Via Instapundit: Horsemen of the Esophagus: Competitive Eating and the Big Fat American Dream.
I love the title.
625 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:20:30am |
re: #616 yma o hyd
Aww ...!
Remind me to bring the cheapest flip-flops only if I ever get to go to Hawaii!
Cheap flip flops don't work there...All you ever wear is flips or sandals...
I lived there for 3 years..You need something really comfy to walk in all day...
I can't count how many perfect Sandals somebody walked off in... Expensive shoes...LOL
It's so cool there..Nobody wears shoes inside...It's a great tradition and very laid back..Like me...
If only everybody went topless it would be paradise..*wink*
626 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:20:40am |
re: #622 yma o hyd
Once I get them transferred, I'll provide you with the evidence!
#1 , Can't we just take your word for it
#2, that will be THE slowedt porn tape EVER!
627 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:20:53am |
re: #490 lawhawk
I was standing in line in Manhattan's Central Park for tickets to the Delacorte Theatre a month ago when a young woman approached me about signing a petition to re-open the investigation of 9/11. (She was working the line). I asked her if she was a "Truther", i.e., whether she believed Bush and Cheney were responsible for the 9/11 attacks. She denied that, and said, "We just want an new investigation." I asked her if she had read the Report of the 9/11 Commission. She said she had not. I told her that I didn't think a new investigation would help, and refused to sign her petition.
Several other people in line were more gullible, and signed. They certainly weren't carefully considering the issue. Van Jones may have been in that category. Either way, I'm shedding no tears for this guy.
628 | SasquatchOnSteroids Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:23:17am |
re: #627 quickjustice
"we just want a new investigation"
What kind of stupid shit is that ?
I would've asked her if she could smell what she was shoveling.
Good for you.
629 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:24:41am |
YMA has video of 2 slugs doing the wild thing!
Pictures at 11...
630 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:24:45am |
631 | Killian Bundy Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:25:04am |
Liberals ready to strike out at White House over Afghanistan surge
Liberals in Congress, already angry about healthcare reform, are sharpening their swords for a fight with the administration over Afghanistan.
They have opened one front with the White House on a public option for healthcare but are ready to open a second front on Afghanistan, even if it damages a president whose success is dependent on a strong record of accomplishment.
According to one House Democrat, the calls to end U.S. military intervention in Afghanistan are growing louder and coming from a larger and more diverse crowd.
On the heels of the deadliest month to date for U.S. troops in Afghanistan, liberals are bracing for a report from the top military commanders that could suggest more resources and troops are needed.
Up to 21,000 more troops is the number being floated around.
All I can say is that Obama had better be prepared to follow his military commander’s advice and do whatever is necessary to defeat the Taliban and al Qaeda, and he had better not be looking for the nearest exit door to cut and run through.
/giving Afghanistan back to the Taliban and al Qaeda on his Presidential watch, after eight years of sacrificing American blood and treasure to the conflict, will not look good on Obama’s historical resume
632 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:29:06am |
re: #624 Silvergirl
Voyeur!
Heh.
I really could not stop watching - it was so beautiful, and I've never seen anything like it before.
Also, I believe me watching kept them safe from marauding magpies and other predatory birds who'd have had them for breakfast.
(Well, thats my excuse!)
633 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:30:01am |
re: #626 sattv4u2
Once I get them transferred, I'll provide you with the evidence!#1 , Can't we just take your word for it
#2, that will be THE slowedt porn tape EVER!
Yep - but it will be completely work-safe!
:-)
634 | Desert Dog Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:30:27am |
re: #631 Killian Bundy
Liberals ready to strike out at White House over Afghanistan surge
Up to 21,000 more troops is the number being floated around.
All I can say is that Obama had better be prepared to follow his military commander’s advice and do whatever is necessary to defeat the Taliban and al Qaeda, and he had better not be looking for the nearest exit door to cut and run through.
/giving Afghanistan back to the Taliban and al Qaeda on his Presidential watch, after eight years of sacrificing American blood and treasure to the conflict, will not look good on Obama’s historical resume
He would be hailed as a "brave hero" in some circles if he cuts and runs.
635 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:30:35am |
An excerpt from Krauthammer's latest:
[Link: www.washingtonpost.com...]
"What happened to President Obama? His wax wings having melted, he is the man who fell to earth. What happened to bring his popularity down further than that of any new president in polling history save Gerald Ford (post-Nixon pardon)?
The conventional wisdom is that Obama made a tactical mistake by farming out his agenda to Congress and allowing himself to be pulled left by the doctrinaire liberals of the Democratic congressional leadership. But the idea of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi pulling Obama left is quite ridiculous. Where do you think he came from, this friend of Chávista ex-terrorist William Ayers, of PLO apologist Rashid Khalidi, of racialist inciter Jeremiah Wright?
But forget the character witnesses. Just look at Obama's behavior as president, beginning with his first address to Congress. Unbidden, unforced and unpushed by the congressional leadership, Obama gave his most deeply felt vision of America, delivering the boldest social democratic manifesto ever issued by a U.S. president. In American politics, you can't get more left than that speech and still be on the playing field.
In a center-right country, that was problem enough. Obama then compounded it by vastly misreading his mandate. He assumed it was personal. This, after winning by a mere seven points in a year of true economic catastrophe, of an extraordinarily unpopular Republican incumbent, and of a politically weak and unsteady opponent. Nonetheless, Obama imagined that, as Fouad Ajami so brilliantly observed, he had won the kind of banana-republic plebiscite that grants caudillo-like authority to remake everything in one's own image.
Accordingly, Obama unveiled his plans for a grand makeover of the American system, animating that vision by enacting measure after measure that greatly enlarged state power, government spending and national debt. Not surprisingly, these measures engendered powerful popular skepticism that burst into tea-party town-hall resistance.
Obama's reaction to that resistance made things worse. Obama fancies himself tribune of the people, spokesman for the grass roots, harbinger of a new kind of politics from below that would upset the established lobbyist special-interest order of Washington. Yet faced with protests from a real grass-roots movement, his party and his supporters called it a mob -- misinformed, misled, irrational, angry, unhinged, bordering on racist. All this while the administration was cutting backroom deals with every manner of special interest -- from drug companies to auto unions to doctors -- in which favors worth billions were quietly and opaquely exchanged."
636 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:31:14am |
re: #629 HoosierHoops
YMA has video of 2 slugs doing the wild thing!
Pictures at 11...
No video - just photos ... will make a lovely 'movie, though!
The whole thing lasted for about 45 minutes ...
637 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:31:58am |
OK, Lizards-- trivia test. In speaking of "wax wings", what character from ancient mythology is Krauthammer referencing here?
638 | Charles Johnson Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:32:05am |
Imagine my surprise to find a bunch of morons melting down overnight.
639 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:32:15am |
re: #636 yma o hyd
No video - just photos ... will make a lovely 'movie, though!
The whole thing lasted for about 45 minutes ...
And that was just the foreplay!
640 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:32:45am |
re: #636 yma o hyd
Put it up on the YouTube "XXX" section! ;-)
642 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:34:35am |
re: #638 Charles
Imagine my surprise to find a bunch of morons melting down overnight.
LOL
Good Morning Charles..Hope today finds you well..
/I hear flushing sounds in the distance
643 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:34:37am |
re: #636 yma o hyd
No video - just photos ... will make a lovely 'movie, though!
The whole thing lasted for about 45 minutes ...
I have to imaging it will be akin to Beck stroking his ego..
644 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:35:04am |
re: #641 Diego
Correct! And who invented the wax wings, and for what purpose?
645 | SasquatchOnSteroids Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:35:26am |
China Oil Deal Is New Source of Strife Among Iraqis
WASIT PROVINCE, Iraq — When China’s biggest oil company signed the first post-invasion oil field development contract in Iraq last year, the deal was seen as a test of Iraq’s willingness to open an industry that had previously prohibited foreign investment.
Wait a sec..isn't that our oil the Chinese are stealing ?
///
646 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:37:06am |
Although, of course, Icarus fell into the sea.
647 | SixDegrees Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:37:15am |
re: #644 quickjustice
Correct! And who invented the wax wings, and for what purpose?
Reminds me of one of my favorite paintings, Landscape with the Fall of Icarus, by Peiter Bruegel.
If you look closely, you can see a bit of Icarus in the lower right corner.
648 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:37:43am |
re: #638 Charles
Imagine my surprise to find a bunch of morons melting down overnight.
Thank God I was asleep!
/
649 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:38:12am |
re: #638 Charles
Imagine my surprise to find a bunch of morons melting down overnight.
Morning Charles. Congrats on your investigation of the Teabaggers and for exposing their links to the Truthers.
650 | Desert Dog Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:38:41am |
re: #635 quickjustice
Krauthammer got this one right, for sure. Obama and his team also have that "never let a good crisis go to waste" mentality as well. They thought they could sneak all of the crap through because of the economic downturn. All of this is now coming back to bite him. Too much, too fast, too radical.
And now, they sit there wonder why the country is turning on him?
651 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:39:27am |
re: #644 quickjustice
His father, Daedalus, to escape imprisonment for knowing too much.
652 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:39:51am |
re: #645 SasquatchOnSteroids
They're not "stealing" it. They're buying it with our dollars. And believe me-- if foreign government refuse to accept U.S. dollars from the Chinese for ANY reason, the Chinese will start dumping dollars.
What the Chinese are doing, strategically speaking, is dumping dollars by using them to buy commodities that will withstand the coming surge in inflation as the value of the U.S. dollar plummets.
653 | Silvergirl Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:39:58am |
re: #644 quickjustice
Correct! And who invented the wax wings, and for what purpose?
Daedalus, so he could escape Crete with his son.
Why the morning quiz?
654 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:41:07am |
re: #646 quickjustice
Although, of course, Icarus fell into the sea.
Yup cause everybody knows that when you flap your wax wings at 50000 feet they melt instead of freezing within 1 minute...Stupid science
*wink*
655 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:41:07am |
re: #651 Diego
Correct again, my friend! You're really on top of this-- or are you merely a skilled googler? ;-)
656 | _RememberTonyC Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:41:32am |
re: #622 yma o hyd
And now for something completely different!
Early this morning I went into the abck garden to check the temperature (our weather forecast being, ahem, haphazard!).
And on the back wall - I saw two slugs, making love!
I was riveted - got my camera and took loads of piccies.
Once I get them transferred, I'll provide you with the evidence!
was it love or just lust?
658 | Spare O'Lake Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:42:55am |
A new low for Obama - he drove an entire Van under the bus.
Good morning, LGF.
659 | Last Mohican Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:43:06am |
re: #538 shanec99
Hey, just to clarify, I was totally defending you (maybe you realized this, but I'll clarify anyway for everyone else's benefit).
We all learn things by hanging out here. Part of the learning process is making mistakes. I, for example, updinged a few birther links back in the beginning. Many reputable lizards did. The "fact" that Obama had never proved his citizenship looked concerning to me, and I didn't understand why this hadn't been investigated. Then, via LGF, I learned that this "fact" wasn't true, and that he had in fact proved his citizenship, so there was no issue here. So I stopped updinging the birther links.
I wouldn't fault anyone for learning about this later than I did. I would only fault someone for seeing the evidence, refusing to accept it, and persisting in promulgating something that they should have known to be false.
660 | SasquatchOnSteroids Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:43:11am |
re: #652 quickjustice
They're not "stealing" it. They're buying it with our dollars. And believe me-- if foreign government refuse to accept U.S. dollars from the Chinese for ANY reason, the Chinese will start dumping dollars.
What the Chinese are doing, strategically speaking, is dumping dollars by using them to buy commodities that will withstand the coming surge in inflation as the value of the U.S. dollar plummets.
Just a snark towards the Bush lied,kids died No blood for oil crowd.
661 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:43:39am |
re: #638 Charles
Time to don the rubber boots, apron and gloves, and the gas mask, and get out the mop and bucket! ;-)
662 | SixDegrees Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:44:08am |
re: #653 Silvergirl
Daedalus, so he could escape Crete with his son.
Why the morning quiz?
Krauthammer uses the story of Icarus to anchor his latest essay, cited above, drawing on the classic tale of hubris and it's consequences.
Everyone remembers Icarus. Few remember his father, Daedelus, who invented and built the wings, and gave ample warning against their misuse.
663 | Taqyia2Me Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:45:26am |
AG Holder and that FCC guy Lloyd and that Cass Sunstein guy are all also still in way past their expiration dates, imho...
665 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:46:57am |
re: #662 SixDegrees
Daeldelus's warning to his son is what makes the story poignant. It's modern equivalent would be, "Hey kid, I invented this automobile so we can escape the Nazis. Don't start joyriding in it."
667 | solomonpanting Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:47:23am |
re: #644 quickjustice
Correct! And who invented the wax wings, and for what purpose?
At first glance, I read wax rings, which serve to seal and prevent toilet leaks at the drain.
669 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:48:21am |
670 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:48:29am |
re: #656 _RememberTonyC
was it love or just lust?
Since it was on a Sunday, its gotta have been love!
;-)
(Sorry, folks - got called awy, trying to catch up here ...!)
671 | SasquatchOnSteroids Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:48:40am |
Gotta chop some grass.
The lawn, not the bong.
L8Rs.
672 | Charles Johnson Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:49:50am |
Two of the idiots who flounced last night had more than 10 sock puppets between them.
673 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:50:19am |
re: #670 yma o hyd
Since it was on a Sunday, its gotta have been love!
;-)
(Sorry, folks - got called awy, trying to catch up here ...!)
You watched them for 45 minutes? Afterwards did either of them fire up a Cigar and sip wine? *wink*
674 | Taqyia2Me Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:51:01am |
re: #664 Diego
Why Holder?
Writing the justifications for the pardons of Marc Rich and the FALN terrorists. No excuses for that shit, imho...
675 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:51:22am |
re: #672 Charles
Not in the least surprised. That's seems to be what counts as a 'grass roots' effort in the GOP these days.
676 | Last Mohican Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:51:34am |
re: #658 Spare O'Lake
A new low for Obama - he drove an entire Van under the bus.
Speaking of Obama's bus, he's about to throw the entire Democratic congressional delegation under it.
Apparently, his next tactic is to claim that the Obamacare bills, which are badly failing, weren't actually Obamacare at all. They were Pelosicare, Reidcare, etc. They were created by the Democratic congressmen, not Obama, and that's why they sucked so much.
When you're a messianic superhero, if you want something done right, you have to do it yourself. So now Obama is going to personally write his own health care proposal. The real "Obamacare." And that will fix everything. Needless to say, this new "real Obamacare" bill will probably be released only after a more careful selling-out process, in which concessions are made to insurance companies, big pharma, unions, the AARP, and everyone else who might have a stake in it. Deals will be cut, to make sure that nobody protests this time.
The MSM will then try to sell the narrative that the entire Democratic congress couldn't fix health care, but Obama, The One True Savior, was able to do it through sheer brilliance and strength of leadership.
677 | jaunte Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:51:48am |
re: #672 Charles
Two of the idiots who flounced last night had more than 10 sock puppets between them.
Amazing. Who has all that spare time to screw around with alternate identities?
678 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:52:03am |
re: #672 Charles
Two of the idiots who flounced last night had more than 10 sock puppets between them.
Schnikeys!
I don't have that many ACTUAL socks!
679 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:52:18am |
re: #672 Charles
If the draino TM doesn't work, get out the snake! ;-)
680 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:53:45am |
re: #679 quickjustice
If the draino TM doesn't work, get out the snake! ;-)
Slugs copulating, pulling out snakes
Whats happening here !?!?!?
681 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:54:06am |
re: #676 Last Mohican
Apparently, his next tactic is to claim that the Obamacare bills, which are badly failing, weren't actually Obamacare at all. They were Pelosicare, Reidcare, etc. They were created by the Democratic congressmen, not Obama, and that's why they sucked so much.
Claim?
682 | MandyManners Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:54:27am |
re: #664 Diego
Why Holder?
Holder's previous job, after all, was as a senior partner with Covington and Burling - a white-shoe DC law firm that devotes considerable pro bono time to defending the Gitmo detainees. The job paid $2 million a year, and he expects to collect a like amount this year as part of his separation package.
As a senior partner, he undoubtedly had significant input on what kind of charity cases his firm picked up. He surely knew that dozens of lawyers from from his firm were among the 500-plus civilian lawyers representing the 244 or so remaining detainees (on top of military-court-appointed defenders).
Even now, his Covington colleagues continue to allege rampant torture at Gitmo. They're fighting hard to have detainees tried through the US court system - essentially given the same rights as US citizens. And their arguments and plans hinge largely on having Holder issue a bad report card.
[Link: www.nypost.com...]
683 | A Man for all Seasons Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:54:40am |
re: #677 jaunte
Amazing. Who has all that spare time to screw around with alternate identities?
Probably the same people that jump on here at 4am and go..
Oh for God's sake I can't take it any more..Delete me Charles!
You can't buy that much stupidity... Even with a Bail out
684 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:54:53am |
re: #673 HoosierHoops
You watched them for 45 minutes? Afterwards did either of them fire up a Cigar and sip wine? *wink*
Yeah - I did. This sort of thing, i.e. something animals do in real life in the wild, has always utterly fascinated me. As a zoologist (ret'd) I was of course doubly enthralled.
Whats a few 45 minutes if one caa see something absolutely wonderful and unique which is happening right in front of one!
As for the cigar and the wine - naw, smoking is prohibited in the UK, and it was too early in the morning for wine ...
:-)))
685 | Irish Rose Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:55:12am |
re: #672 Charles
Two of the idiots who flounced last night had more than 10 sock puppets between them.
I'm sure you're not surprised.
Good morning, Charles.
Hope today is a better day for you than yesterday was.
686 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:55:49am |
re: #680 sattv4u2
Slugs copulating, pulling out snakes
Whats happening here !?!?!?
Natural History lesson?
687 | MandyManners Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:56:33am |
re: #672 Charles
Two of the idiots who flounced last night had more than 10 sock puppets between them.
Busy butt-heads.
688 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:56:46am |
re: #682 MandyManners
Holder's previous job, after all, was as a senior partner with Covington and Burling - a white-shoe DC law firm that devotes considerable pro bono time to defending the Gitmo detainees. The job paid $2 million a year, and he expects to collect a like amount this year as part of his separation package.
It is that he made too much money or that everyone in GitMo is guilty and doesn't deserve their day in court?
689 | Taqyia2Me Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:56:57am |
re: #682 MandyManners
[Link: www.nypost.com...]
Sounds like solid reasoning for the man to at least recuse himself from much of the stuff he is going forward with...
691 | MandyManners Sun, Sep 6, 2009 8:58:19am |
re: #688 Diego
It is that he made too much money or that everyone in GitMo is guilty and doesn't deserve their day in court?
Have you ever heard the phrase "conflict of interest"?
693 | SixDegrees Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:00:22am |
re: #676 Last Mohican
Speaking of Obama's bus, he's about to throw the entire Democratic congressional delegation under it.
Apparently, his next tactic is to claim that the Obamacare bills, which are badly failing, weren't actually Obamacare at all. They were Pelosicare, Reidcare, etc. They were created by the Democratic congressmen, not Obama, and that's why they sucked so much.
When you're a messianic superhero, if you want something done right, you have to do it yourself. So now Obama is going to personally write his own health care proposal. The real "Obamacare." And that will fix everything. Needless to say, this new "real Obamacare" bill will probably be released only after a more careful selling-out process, in which concessions are made to insurance companies, big pharma, unions, the AARP, and everyone else who might have a stake in it. Deals will be cut, to make sure that nobody protests this time.
The MSM will then try to sell the narrative that the entire Democratic congress couldn't fix health care, but Obama, The One True Savior, was able to do it through sheer brilliance and strength of leadership.
Quite possible. There's a huge risk associated with such a tactic, though: it exposes 0 to actual responsibility. If it's his bill, it's his fault if it fails, or if it turns out to be some other kind of disaster. It leaves him with no one to blame but himself, a situation he's carefully avoided so far.
I also look for a massive surge of partisan sniping to begin emanating directly from the Oval Office almost immediately. 0 will attempt to goad Congress into using their majority status to ramrod a bill through, no matter what the costs, simply to enable a declaration of victory. Way too many things he promised during the campaign - cap and trade; an ethical Administration; governmental transparency; victory in Afghanistan, and so many others - are failing, being ignored or actively jettisoned, and he desperately wants to check the box next to "health care" even if it's a plan that bears little resemblance to what was promised. And he'll want to be in a position to blame the GOP for any Democratic failures, despite their unanimous minority status, hence the pending runup in GOP demonization.
694 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:00:27am |
re: #691 MandyManners
You mean like a Fundie being put in charge of the Dept of Education in Texas? That sort of conflict? ;)
695 | MandyManners Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:00:44am |
re: #689 Taqyia2Me
Sounds like solid reasoning for the man to at least recuse himself from much of the stuff he is going forward with...
Pianobuff posted a story yesterday about the ethics waivers being granted to Holder and others in FCBBHO's administration.
696 | Irish Rose Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:00:57am |
Ace is attacking me on his mainpage now.
Guess I shouldn't be surprised.
697 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:01:24am |
re: #688 Diego
It is that he made too much money or that everyone in GitMo is guilty and doesn't deserve their day in court?
Military Tribunal, yes
"Day in court",,, feh
698 | yma o hyd Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:01:49am |
699 | SixDegrees Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:02:24am |
re: #696 Irish Rose
Ace is attacking me on his mainpage now.
Guess I shouldn't be surprised.
Some people desperately need lives.
700 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:02:26am |
re: #694 Diego
You mean like a Fundie being put in charge of the Dept of Education in Texas? That sort of conflict? ;)
Yup, and Charles (and the Lizards) have excoriated them about it!
Ahhh ,, consistency!
702 | Charles Johnson Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:02:58am |
re: #696 Irish Rose
Ace is attacking me on his mainpage now.
Guess I shouldn't be surprised.
It's not even worth noticing that pathetic weenie. Just stop reading it.
703 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:03:13am |
re: #696 Irish Rose
Ace is attacking me on his mainpage now.
Guess I shouldn't be surprised.
Dear ACE
You're a JOKEr
Love
Me
704 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:03:40am |
re: #680 sattv4u2
Great dirty minds think alike! ;-) It reminds me of the time I was on an elevator (lift) when a Brit stepped on and pushed the button for my floor. Attempting weak wit, I said, "Great minds think alike."
To which he replied acerbically, "And fools seldom differ!"
705 | Walter L. Newton Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:04:22am |
re: #694 Diego
You mean like a Fundie being put in charge of the Dept of Education in Texas? That sort of conflict? ;)
A fundamentalist can't hold a public office? A Catholic can't hold a public office? How about we make sure no jews hold public office?
I'm not sure what you point is? Someone who doesn't hold your same views shouldn't get employment?
706 | quickjustice Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:06:40am |
re: #696 Irish Rose
Wow! Attacked by Ace? That's almost as impressive as being attacked by the N.Y. Times! ;-)
707 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:07:27am |
re: #706 quickjustice
Wow! Attacked by Ace? That's almost as impressive as being attacked by the N.Y. Times! ;-)
And almost as widely read!
And almost has as many advertisers left!
708 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:07:29am |
re: #705 Walter L. Newton
My point? How about "I don't want your church deciding what my kids should learn". By 'your' I don't mean you, I mean anyone who is deciding what is and isn't taught shouldn't be basing their decisions on their personal religious beliefs.
709 | jaunte Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:08:03am |
re: #682 MandyManners
Maybe he'll get another special ethics waiver like the one in the Stevens case.
710 | Desert Dog Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:08:24am |
re: #695 MandyManners
Pianobuff posted a story yesterday about the ethics waivers being granted to Holder and others in FCBBHO's administration.
Ethics wavers? That's a new one on me. Is that a common practice in Presidential history?
711 | Desert Dog Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:09:49am |
re: #708 Diego
My point? How about "I don't want your church deciding what my kids should learn". By 'your' I don't mean you, I mean anyone who is deciding what is and isn't taught shouldn't be basing their decisions on their personal religious beliefs.
How is that related to Eric Holder making boat loads of money off of Gitmo detainees before coming into the AG office and now he is in making decisions about then?
712 | MandyManners Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:10:20am |
Pianobuff's post.
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]
713 | jaunte Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:10:28am |
re: #710 Desert Dog
Ethics wavers? That's a new one on me. Is that a common practice in Presidential history?
It looks like the number has been slowly increasing over the years:
[Link: www.google.com...]
714 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:10:38am |
re: #711 Desert Dog
I was replying to Walter, not the subject of conflict of interest.
715 | Walter L. Newton Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:10:59am |
re: #708 Diego
My point? How about "I don't want your church deciding what my kids should learn". By 'your' I don't mean you, I mean anyone who is deciding what is and isn't taught shouldn't be basing their decisions on their personal religious beliefs.
If a person holding a public office brings his/hers religious views into their job, I certainly want to see them go.
What I asked you, and what I didn't get a clear answer about is this. Should a persons religious belief make him unqualified for a public government job?
716 | Killgore Trout Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:11:18am |
Robert Spencer's new friends have another counterjihad riot...
UK anti-Islamic extremism protest turns violent
A rally against Islamic extremism in the ethnically mixed English city of Birmingham turned violent Saturday as protesters clashed with counter-demonstrators. Police reported more than 30 arrests.Trouble broke out when protesters from the English Defense League, a group which says it is opposed to militant Islam in Britain, were met in Birmingham's downtown area by anti-fascist activists and counter-demonstrators.
717 | Spare O'Lake Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:12:06am |
re: #694 Diego
You mean like a Fundie being put in charge of the Dept of Education in Texas? That sort of conflict? ;)
In Holder's case, the perceived financial conflict of interest could easily have been avoided by his law firm getting off the record on the Gitmo cases.
718 | Walter L. Newton Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:12:14am |
re: #711 Desert Dog
How is that related to Eric Holder making boat loads of money off of Gitmo detainees before coming into the AG office and now he is in making decisions about then?
He was replying to me about a totally different topic. I was discussing a side question that came out of something Diego said.
719 | Desert Dog Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:13:05am |
re: #713 jaunte
It looks like the number has been slowly increasing over the years:
[Link: www.google.com...]
That's a sneaky way to skirt issues. Sounds like too many insiders running things in and out of government.
720 | Desert Dog Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:13:30am |
re: #718 Walter L. Newton
He was replying to me about a totally different topic. I was discussing a side question that came out of something Diego said.
my bad
721 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:13:37am |
re: #708 Diego
My point? How about "I don't want your church deciding what my kids should learn". By 'your' I don't mean you, I mean anyone who is deciding what is and isn't taught shouldn't be basing their decisions on their personal religious beliefs.
IF (big if, there) someone were to say or exhibit that they are deciding what my child learns due to his radical religious beleifes, "we" (the Queens we) will deal with it then.
Someone (or group) has to decide upon curriculum. Should we ban all peoples of all faiths, no matter how zealous or not they are, from being on these boards? What if someone was raised lets say Jewish, but since the age of majority has not practiced, should they be excluded? After all, their childhood lessons IN faith still could influence them!
Can You Say Slippery Slope, I Know You Can!!
722 | What, me worry? Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:14:07am |
The highways jammed with broken heroes on a last chance power drive.
Morning lizards!
723 | Irish Rose Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:14:13am |
re: #706 quickjustice
Wow! Attacked by Ace? That's almost as impressive as being attacked by the N.Y. Times! ;-)
I left him a message on the blog this morning.
Enough said.
724 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:14:15am |
re: #715 Walter L. Newton
Well gee, Walter, I don't know. How about a devil worshiper?
725 | Last Mohican Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:14:19am |
re: #693 SixDegrees
He's certainly doubling down on the issue, which may or may not be a politically wise move. But I suspect it won't end up hurting him either way.
We've already seen some of the events that you describe. The Democratic Party mustered its massive, well-organized, multimillion dollar astroturfing machine to start the partisan sniping. They relentlessly sold the talking points that the opposition to Obamacare was coming exclusively from racist, gun-toting "mobs" that were hired by insurance companies to ensure that poor and middle-class people would be left to die in the streets. They paid people to show up at "town hall" meetings and shout down any Obamacare critics. It was a serious campaign of thuggery, but in the end, it's failing. And the main reason, I think, is that Obama failed to get the bill rammed through congress without anyone even discussing it, the way he succeeded in doing with the "stimulus bill."
So I think the fate of the forthcoming "real true Obamacare" bill will depend almost entirely on whether Obama is able to ram this one through without anyone debating it. And that in turn will depend on him throwing enough bones to potential critics to make them keep their mouths shut. The end result may be watered down enough to make it little more than a successful check mark for his "health care" box. But even if it fails again, he'll probably find a way to blame it on someone else. He has spent his whole career successfully blaming other people for his failures and misdeeds. He has a real talent for it.
726 | Desert Dog Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:17:03am |
re: #724 Diego
Well gee, Walter, I don't know. How about a devil worshiper?
That would definitely be a conflict of interest if it was a politician.
727 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:17:12am |
re: #724 Diego
Well gee, Walter, I don't know. How about a devil worshiper?
Please see and answer #721
Thank you
728 | jaunte Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:17:49am |
re: #719 Desert Dog
I guess the practical issue is that when hiring an expert to work for the government, the only available experts are those who have previous connections with companies with a financial interest in government decisions.
The waivers are a workaround to gain the expert's knowledge.
729 | Gang of One Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:19:01am |
re: #675 Diego
Not in the least surprised. That's seems to be what counts as a 'grass roots' effort in the GOP these days.
Huh?
730 | debutaunt Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:19:07am |
re: #708 Diego
My point? How about "I don't want your church deciding what my kids should learn". By 'your' I don't mean you, I mean anyone who is deciding what is and isn't taught shouldn't be basing their decisions on their personal religious beliefs.
I hope your politicians decide.
731 | jaunte Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:19:24am |
re: #728 jaunte
In the case of the attorney general, I think the "only available expert" standard is in some question.
732 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:19:28am |
re: #724 Diego
Well gee, Walter, I don't know. How about a devil worshiper?
Hopw would you know they are a devil worshiper? As to Walters point, what religions should not be accepted as board members?
You say Devil worship and Creationists. What others? Buhddists? Muslims? Hindis?
733 | Gang of One Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:21:14am |
re: #637 quickjustice
OK, Lizards-- trivia test. In speaking of "wax wings", what character from ancient mythology is Krauthammer referencing here?
A little bit of LGF trivia here: did you know that our own Lizard Master,
Charles Johnson, played guitar on Stanley Clarke's 1977 album 'School Days' under the name Charles Icarus?
/Or so I recall Charles telling us once upon a time.
734 | MandyManners Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:21:19am |
re: #732 sattv4u2
Hopw would you know they are a devil worshiper? As to Walters point, what religions should not be accepted as board members?
You say Devil worship and Creationists. What others? Buhddists? Muslims? Hindis?
Pastafarrians.
735 | Walter L. Newton Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:21:52am |
re: #724 Diego
Well gee, Walter, I don't know. How about a devil worshiper?
Fine with me as long as they don't try to inject that into the system as public policy.
I'm an atheist, so I'm not afraid of any of this mythical poo-poo, and I certainly have no problem with anyone believing what they want, as long as they keep it out of politics.
There is way to much fear among progressive about peoples personal belief.
Boo!
736 | debutaunt Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:22:07am |
re: #726 Desert Dog
That would definitely be a conflict of interest if it was a politician.
hahahahhahaahhahahaa
737 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:22:47am |
738 | Spare O'Lake Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:23:17am |
re: #732 sattv4u2
Hopw would you know they are a devil worshiper? As to Walters point, what religions should not be accepted as board members?
You say Devil worship and Creationists. What others? Buhddists? Muslims? Hindis?
Don't forget the Atheists and the Scientists - they have irons in the fire too.
739 | debutaunt Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:24:10am |
741 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:24:57am |
re: #738 Spare O'Lake
Don't forget the Atheists and the Scientists - they have irons in the fire too.
Wiccans, Amish !
DIEGO ,, hell of a can a worms you're opening up there
742 | Walter L. Newton Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:25:05am |
re: #738 Spare O'Lake
Don't forget the Atheists and the Scientists - they have irons in the fire too.
And don't forget Van Jones, Fellow at the Noetic Institute, which delves into the hard science of mind reading...
743 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:25:42am |
re: #721 sattv4u2
Can You Say Slippery Slope, I Know You Can!!
Creationism and 'Intelligent Design' as science?
I don't much care what someone believes. Keep it to yourself where it belongs. I don't burden people with my beliefs and expect the same in return. Likewise, I don't want those beliefs reflected in their decisions.
You made a mistake here in that you made a jump from 'conflict of interest', which it would be, to 'religious belief make him unqualified for a public government job'. I never said they were not qualifies, just that it could be a conflict of interest, especially if they reflect their personal beliefs in their decisions in the post.
744 | MandyManners Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:26:26am |
745 | MandyManners Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:26:51am |
746 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:27:01am |
DIEGO
So tell us, who is on your list of APPROVED School Board Members?
(now that we've eleiminated people of faiths, that list should be shorter!)
747 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:27:18am |
748 | BARACK THE VOTE Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:27:21am |
Random Saturday night/sunday morning music! Kirk and Spock!
Superdisturbing combo, IMO.
749 | Pianobuff Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:27:53am |
re: #728 jaunte
I guess the practical issue is that when hiring an expert to work for the government, the only available experts are those who have previous connections with companies with a financial interest in government decisions.
The waivers are a workaround to gain the expert's knowledge.
True. My take on why this sort of thing comes under scrutiny is the result of Obama singing from the populist hymnal, denouncing all competition as Washington insiders, and making the extraordinary claim that his administration would be unique in the absence of "players" on his team.
750 | BARACK THE VOTE Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:28:07am |
re: #746 sattv4u2
DIEGO
So tell us, who is on your list of APPROVED School Board Members?
(now that we've eleiminated people of faiths, that list should be shorter!)
No Creationists. How's that?
751 | Charles Johnson Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:28:38am |
re: #746 sattv4u2
DIEGO
So tell us, who is on your list of APPROVED School Board Members?
(now that we've eleiminated people of faiths, that list should be shorter!)
I didn't really want to get into this, but you are distorting Diego's words beyond recognition.
There's nothing wrong with people of faith on school boards. There IS something wrong with creationists on school boards, because they invariably try to get their delusions forced on schoolchildren.
752 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:28:54am |
re: #743 Diego
Creationism and 'Intelligent Design' as science?
I don't much care what someone believes. Keep it to yourself where it belongs. I don't burden people with my beliefs and expect the same in return. Likewise, I don't want those beliefs reflected in their decisions.You made a mistake here in that you made a jump from 'conflict of interest', which it would be, to 'religious belief make him unqualified for a public government job'. I never said they were not qualifies, just that it could be a conflict of interest, especially if they reflect their personal beliefs in their decisions in the post.
STRAWMAN ,,
A) show me where I (or anyone) stated they are
B) doesn't answer the DIRECT question posed to you in 721
753 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:28:58am |
re: #746 sattv4u2
You're making much more of it than I invested. Read #743
754 | Walter L. Newton Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:30:27am |
re: #743 Diego
Creationism and 'Intelligent Design' as science?
[snip]
Or like Van Jones heading up a department which deals with the creation of green jobs, which of course deals with science which of course he has no background in except his Fellowship in the Noetic Institute, which studies...
"The Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS) was co-founded in 1973 by former astronaut Edgar Mitchell and industrialist Paul N. Temple[1][2] to encourage and conduct research on human potentials.[3] Institute programs include "extended human capacities," "integral health and healing," and "emerging worldviews." This includes research into topics such as spontaneous remission, meditation, consciousness, alternative healing practices, spirituality, human potential, psychic abilities and survival of consciousness after bodily death, among others.[4] The institute's name is derived from the Greek word nous, meaning direct or inner knowing, a reference to intuition."
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
Would you have suggested that Van Jones wasn't qualified for his job because of this connection?
755 | Charles Johnson Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:30:37am |
re: #752 sattv4u2
STRAWMAN ,,
A) show me where I (or anyone) stated they are
B) doesn't answer the DIRECT question posed to you in 721
No -- THIS is a straw man:
now that we've eleiminated people of faiths...
Because nobody ever said this. You're making it up and putting the words in people's mouths.
756 | Spare O'Lake Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:32:07am |
re: #743 Diego
Creationism and 'Intelligent Design' as science?
I don't much care what someone believes. Keep it to yourself where it belongs. I don't burden people with my beliefs and expect the same in return. Likewise, I don't want those beliefs reflected in their decisions.
You made a mistake here in that you made a jump from 'conflict of interest', which it would be, to 'religious belief make him unqualified for a public government job'. I never said they were not qualifies, just that it could be a conflict of interest, especially if they reflect their personal beliefs in their decisions in the post.
Actually, you just avoided Mandy's valid criticism of Holder by tossing off a largely irrelevant snarky winky about Texas creationism.
757 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:33:03am |
re: #751 Charles
I didn't really want to get into this, but you are distorting Diego's words beyond recognition.
There's nothing wrong with people of faith on school boards. There IS something wrong with creationists on school boards, because they invariably try to get their delusions forced on schoolchildren.
And when they try to instill ID/ Creationism into a science class I will be among the 1st at the next board meeting. But to Walters point (and mine) to decide prior that someone is nullified due to "A" religion, I beleive opens up the slippery slope
758 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:34:21am |
re: #756 Spare O'Lake
Actually, she made her point and I didn't disagree.
759 | jaunte Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:34:25am |
re: #756 Spare O'Lake
Actually, you just avoided Mandy's valid criticism of Holder by tossing off a largely irrelevant snarky winky about Texas creationism.
I am curious about how that financial conflict of interest will be dealt with.
761 | Randall Gross Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:35:28am |
Personally I like article six of our Constitution: no religious test. Since DI and associated movements have a test for political office based upon religion, they are the problem, not individual Christians, not Christianity, not belief, not even organized, political religion. Rather a minority subsect that wants to control and dominate.
762 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:35:31am |
re: #755 Charles
Because nobody ever said this. You're making it up and putting the words in people's mouths.
It was in response to this
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]
If I misinterpreted what his meaning was, I'm sorry
763 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:36:07am |
re: #757 sattv4u2
..to decide prior that someone is nullified due to "A" religion, I beleive opens up the slippery slope
And again: I never said that. I only said it could be a conflict of interest.
764 | Walter L. Newton Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:36:52am |
re: #757 sattv4u2
And when they try to instill ID/ Creationism into a science class I will be among the 1st at the next board meeting. But to Walters point (and mine) to decide prior that someone is nullified due to "A" religion, I beleive opens up the slippery slope
I was asking if Diego felt a prior background in some religious thought was a disqualifier for a public office.
I was asking, not assuming Deigo believes this.
765 | Bloodnok Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:37:38am |
766 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:38:21am |
re: #762 sattv4u2
If I misinterpreted what his meaning was, I'm sorry
No worries m8. We're in a textual environment, misunderstandings happen.
767 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:38:34am |
re: #763 Diego
And again: I never said that. I only said it could be a conflict of interest.
Yes, absolutely it "couold be" But as Walter asked, does being a "fundie" (or any othre beleife,,, as you stated devil worship) automatically disqualify one from being on a board? And if so, wherre to draw the line
THAT was my original point. I NEVER satted that ID SHOULD be part of ANY curriculum
768 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:39:01am |
re: #764 Walter L. Newton
I was asking if Diego felt a prior background in some religious thought was a disqualifier for a public office.
I was asking, not assuming Deigo believes this.
As was I
769 | debutaunt Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:41:03am |
770 | jaunte Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:41:18am |
Having a political interest, even a religiously based political interest, is not considered a conflict of interest in the same way as having a financial conflict of interest, which is what Mandy was talking about.
771 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:41:47am |
re: #764 Walter L. Newton
I was asking if Diego felt a prior background in some religious thought was a disqualifier for a public office.
I was asking, not assuming Deigo believes this.
A disqualifier? Not automatically, no. But then, if Obama put a Islamic Fundamentalist in charge of the DHS how would you feel about it?
772 | What, me worry? Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:42:54am |
773 | Walter L. Newton Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:44:15am |
re: #771 Diego
A disqualifier? Not automatically, no. But then, if Obama put a Islamic Fundamentalist in charge of the DHS how would you feel about it?
Fine with me if the person is qualified.
774 | Flyers1974 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:45:20am |
What happened to President Obama? His wax wings having melted, he is the man who fell to earth. What happened to bring his popularity down further than that of any new president in polling history save Gerald Ford (post-Nixon pardon)?
(1) The economy did not improve quickly; (2) Obama's political opponents have been somewhat effective, as political opponents often are; (3) Some liberals believe that Obama is not liberal enough. (4) Some independents are worried about Obama's health care plan... the idea of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi pulling Obama left is quite ridiculous. Where do you think he came from, this friend of Chávista ex-terrorist William Ayers, of PLO apologist Rashid Khalidi, of racialist inciter Jeremiah Wright?
Obama thus far appears to be a moderate liberal. If anything, overly cautious. Presidents seldom govern radically, if for no other reason than practicality. His foreign policy moves have been predictable and safe. The stimulus and bailouts were a response to an unusual and dangerous financial crisis. Few liberals were crying for the bailout of big companies Obama laid in bed with various nasty elements of the local power structure in order to advance politically. No doubt he gained politically from this on his way to the state legislature and the US Senate. He has since paid a heavy political price. Fair enough. And who will the next GOP president have associated with during the rise to power? Will they be George HW Bush types? From today's Republican Party?
But forget the character witnesses. Just look at Obama's behavior as president, beginning with his first address to Congress. Unbidden, unforced and unpushed by the congressional leadership, Obama gave his most deeply felt vision of America, delivering the boldest social democratic manifesto ever issued by a U.S. president. In American politics, you can't get more left than that speech and still be on the playing field.
Yet he was and is still on the playing field.
In a center-right country, that was problem enough. Obama then compounded it by vastly misreading his mandate. He assumed it was personal. This, after winning by a mere seven points in a year of true economic catastrophe, of an extraordinarily unpopular Republican incumbent, and of a politically weak and unsteady opponent. Nonetheless, Obama imagined that, as Fouad Ajami so brilliantly observed, he had won the kind of banana-republic plebiscite that grants caudillo-like authority to remake everything in one's own image.
How do you know what Obama assumed or imagined? Accordingly, Obama unveiled his plans for a grand makeover of the American system, animating that vision by enacting measure after measure that greatly enlarged state power, government spending and national debt. Not surprisingly, these measures engendered powerful popular skepticism that burst into tea-party town-hall resistance.
Bush also enlarged government spending and national debt. Where were the tea parties during the Bush administration?
Obama's reaction to that resistance made things worse. Obama fancies himself tribune of the people, spokesman for the grass roots, harbinger of a new kind of politics from below that would upset the established lobbyist special-interest order of Washington. Yet faced with protests from a real grass-roots movement, his party and his supporters called it a mob -- misinformed, misled, irrational, angry, unhinged, bordering on racist. All this while the administration was cutting backroom deals with every manner of special interest -- from drug companies to auto unions to doctors -- in which favors worth billions were quietly and opaquely exchanged
How do you know how Obama fancies himself? The protesters were and are misinformed, misled, irrational, angry, unhinged, bordering on racist. Of course these backroom deals were made, as they are in every administration. Did you believe the Hope/Change campaign theme? Did you also believe the Bush uniter not a divider theme?
775 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:46:14am |
'Religiously based political interest' I do not support. The two should not cross.
Like when politicians say, "We should have religion back in the schools!" I automatically say, "Okay, how's Hinduism grab ya?". It's not 'religion' they want, it's their religion.
776 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:48:27am |
re: #771 Diego
A disqualifier? Not automatically, no. But then, if Obama put a Islamic Fundamentalist in charge of the DHS how would you feel about it?
Depends on their actions
If their 1st actions in office is to beef up the borders, acknowledge that we are in a war on terror and get rid of the "man caused disaters" bull.. FINE
If however their 1st actions in office were to pass out Korans as mandatory guide and make all women in the agency cover their heads
NOT SO FINE
777 | jaunte Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:48:51am |
re: #775 Diego
What's your stance on financial conflicts of interest?
778 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:50:44am |
re: #773 Walter L. Newton
Fine with me if the person is qualified.
And yet people are called 'socialist' and 'communist' and thus unacceptable to be a part of government?
779 | Randall Gross Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:51:42am |
re: #774 Flyers1974
If you are going to show up with two day old canned spam, please at least give attribution to Charles Krauthammer.
780 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:52:23am |
re: #777 jaunte
Like awarding no-bid contracts to friends and associates?
782 | Gang of One Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:53:25am |
re: #778 Diego
And yet people are called 'socialist' and 'communist' and thus unacceptable to be a part of government?
Well, seeing as how Communism is an utter failure and Socialism is not much better, I would not want one in office. But I certainly would not approve of any laws excluding one from office.
783 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:53:58am |
re: #781 jaunte
Yes, quite a bit if it can be proven and the person doesn't give up the financial benefit..
785 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:55:31am |
re: #778 Diego
And yet people are called 'socialist' and 'communist' and thus unacceptable to be a part of government?
There's a distinction, imho
Socialism and Communism are political philosophies. The person that you are talking about would be in a position of politics
The "fundie" is a religious beleif, and althouigh he certainly MAY try to interject that into the political (school), it's not his primary job
786 | Walter L. Newton Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:57:46am |
re: #785 sattv4u2
There's a distinction, imho
Socialism and Communism are political philosophies. The person that you are talking about would be in a position of politics
The "fundie" is a religious beleif, and althouigh he certainly MAY try to interject that into the political (school), it's not his primary job
Thanks, I was going to point out the evident, but you did a fine job. Knight-jump illogic, I'm out of this discussion.
787 | What, me worry? Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:58:08am |
Well...
Palin is an admitted creationist, but it didn't seem to stop people here from supporting her last year. And that was to the #2 spot in our country.
Not picking a fight, I'm just saying.
One can be a religious person and hold office in this country if they don't force their ideology into the political debate/spectrum. Creationism may be a different issue because it crosses religions, IOW it's not idea exclusive to Christians and people who hold very strong beliefs about it seem to what to push it into the academic agenda.
If I found out a politician or school board member was a creationist, I would first have to find out how strongly held that belief is (do they openly talk about it?, bring it into debate) and whether they have a history of using it as a platform.
788 | Pianobuff Sun, Sep 6, 2009 9:58:58am |
re: #787 marjoriemoon
Well...
Palin is an admitted creationist, but it didn't seem to stop people here from supporting her last year. And that was to the #2 spot in our country.
Not picking a fight, I'm just saying.
One can be a religious person and hold office in this country if they don't force their ideology into the political debate/spectrum. Creationism may be a different issue because it crosses religions, IOW it's not idea exclusive to Christians and people who hold very strong beliefs about it seem to what to push it into the academic agenda.
If I found out a politician or school board member was a creationist, I would first have to find out how strongly held that belief is (do they openly talk about it?, bring it into debate) and whether they have a history of using it as a platform.
Was Palin a school board member at one time?
789 | What, me worry? Sun, Sep 6, 2009 10:00:00am |
re: #788 Pianobuff
Was Palin a school board member at one time?
Don't think so, but I think the VP trumps a school board member.
790 | Charles Johnson Sun, Sep 6, 2009 10:00:49am |
re: #787 marjoriemoon
Well...
Palin is an admitted creationist, but it didn't seem to stop people here from supporting her last year. And that was to the #2 spot in our country.
I had two reasons for supporting the McCain-Palin ticket in the last election:
1) Palin stated clearly that she did not want creationism taught in schools.
2) The alternative to them was worse.
I voted against Barack Obama, not for Sarah Palin.
And for what it's worth, at this point, with everything else that's come out, the only way I would ever vote for Sarah Palin again is if the alternative is radically worse. I've lost all respect for her.
791 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 10:01:41am |
792 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 10:03:13am |
793 | Diego Sun, Sep 6, 2009 10:04:10am |
As I recall, and I don't often recalling anything about Palin, she was on the school board and tried, or maybe seceded, to get gay books removed from the library. I could be wrong.
794 | What, me worry? Sun, Sep 6, 2009 10:06:15am |
re: #790 Charles
I had two reasons for supporting the McCain-Palin ticket in the last election:
1) Palin stated clearly that she did not want creationism taught in schools.
2) The alternative to them was worse.
I voted against Barack Obama, not for Sarah Palin.
And for what it's worth, at this point, with everything else that's come out, the only way I would ever vote for Sarah Palin again is if the alternative is radically worse. I've lost all respect for her.
During her run for Gov, she supported teaching creationism alongside evolution. When she ran as VP, she said she wouldn't push the issue. I was never a fan of Palin anyway, and her former stance made me nervous.
795 | sattv4u2 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 10:08:36am |
re: #790 Charles
And for what it's worth, at this point, with everything else that's come out, the only way I would ever vote for Sarah Palin again is if the alternative is radically worse. I've lost all respect for her.
Conundrum. What if the GOP were to find a strong fiscal/ military conservative, non-fundie/ non ID/ Creationists with a soemwhat liberal social agenda (not pro life) who then picked Palin as #2 and ran agaisnt Obama / Biden in 2012!
796 | What, me worry? Sun, Sep 6, 2009 10:15:00am |
re: #793 Diego
As I recall, and I don't often recalling anything about Palin, she was on the school board and tried, or maybe seceded, to get gay books removed from the library. I could be wrong.
I think she did this as Mayor of Wasilla, the book banning thing. I'm not sure there was ever a list of which books. I'd have to go look.
If I remember the story, she asked the librarian if she would be willing to pull certain books out of the library, but didn't mention the books. The librarian said infatically no. A few weeks later, Palin called for her resignation.
[Link: www.adn.com...]
797 | Flyers1974 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 10:25:26am |
re: #779 Thanos
If you are going to show up with two day old canned spam, please at least give attribution to Charles Krauthammer.
Perhaps you missed that someone posted portions of Krauthammer's WP article and linked to same at #635 above.
798 | Randall Gross Sun, Sep 6, 2009 10:45:42am |
re: #796 marjoriemoon
I think she did this as Mayor of Wasilla, the book banning thing. I'm not sure there was ever a list of which books. I'd have to go look.
If I remember the story, she asked the librarian if she would be willing to pull certain books out of the library, but didn't mention the books. The librarian said infatically no. A few weeks later, Palin called for her resignation.
[Link: www.adn.com...]
She never called for banning books, covered here
[Link: noblesseoblige.org...]
799 | Randall Gross Sun, Sep 6, 2009 10:48:25am |
re: #797 Flyers1974
Perhaps you missed that someone posted portions of Krauthammer's WP article and linked to same at #635 above.
Maybe I did, but you should always attribute or say "continued" or something. I was thinking wow! Flyers sure can write!
800 | Flyers1974 Sun, Sep 6, 2009 11:09:28am |
re: #799 Thanos
Maybe I did, but you should always attribute or say "continued" or something. I was thinking wow! Flyers sure can write!
Nah, the totality of my writing career (thus far) consists of posting here. Point taken though. :)