Bruce Sterling on Wikileaks

Opinion • Views: 22,383

Science fiction author Bruce Sterling has a really interesting take on Wikileaks, Julian Assange, the NSA, and cypherpunk culture: The Blast Shack.

An excerpt:

The world has lousy diplomacy now. It’s dysfunctional. The world corps diplomatique are weak, really weak, and the US diplomatic corps, which used to be the senior and best-engineered outfit there, is rattling around bottled-up in blast-proofed bunkers. It’s scary how weak and useless they are.

US diplomats used to know what to do with dissidents in other nations. If they were communists they got briskly repressed, but if they had anything like a free-market outlook, then US diplomats had a whole arsenal of gentle and supportive measures; Radio Free Europe, publication in the West, awards, foreign travel, flattery, moral support; discreet things, in a word, but exceedingly useful things. Now they’re harassing Julian by turning those tools backwards.

For a US diplomat, Assange is like some digitized nightmare-reversal of a kindly Cold War analog dissident. He read the dissident playbook and he downloaded it as a textfile; but, in fact, Julian doesn’t care about the USA. It’s just another obnoxious national entity. He happens to be more or less Australian, and he’s no great enemy of America. If he’d had the chance to leak Australian cables he would have leapt on that with the alacrity he did on Kenya. Of course, when Assange did it that to meager little Kenya, all the grown-ups thought that was groovy; he had to hack a superpower in order to touch the third rail.

But the American diplomatic corps, and all it thinks it represents, is just collateral damage between Assange and his goal. He aspires to his transparent crypto-utopia in the way George Bush aspired to imaginary weapons of mass destruction. And the American diplomatic corps are so many Iraqis in that crusade. They’re the civilian casualties.

As a novelist, you gotta like the deep and dark irony here. As somebody attempting to live on a troubled world… I dunno. It makes one want to call up the Red Cross and volunteer to fund planetary tranquilizers.

Read the whole thing…

(h/t Boing Boing.)

Jump to bottom

28 comments
1 albusteve  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 1:51:52pm

I concur about our weakness, or whatever you'd want to call it....we don't have much mojo anymore to influence events, or don't use what we might have

2 Obdicut  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 1:54:55pm

I think he's wrong that Assange doesn't have it in specially for America. We're not just another obnoxious national entity; we're a superpower.

3 Charles Johnson  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 1:58:20pm

re: #2 Obdicut

I think he's wrong that Assange doesn't have it in specially for America. We're not just another obnoxious national entity; we're a superpower.

I differ with some of his points, too - I don't think Assange is really a mastermind planning every detail. I think he's pretty much making it up as he goes.

4 Usually refered to as anyways  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:03:29pm

re: #2 Obdicut

I think he's wrong that Assange doesn't have it in specially for America.

I think it looks that way as the largest cache of documents happen to be from the states.

Kenya was a couple of years ago now.
I believe the Russians are about to see some cables.

And lets not forget their has been pain for other countries including Australia through the US leaks.

5 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:05:33pm

Good read. The man sure is a very good writer.

Commonly, the authorities don’t much like to crush apple-cheeked white-guy hackers like Bradley Manning. It’s hard to charge hackers with crimes, even when they gleefully commit them, because it’s hard to find prosecutors and judges willing to bone up on the drudgery of understanding what they did.

This made me smirk.

Bradley’s gonna become a “spy” whose “espionage” consisted of making the activities of a democratic government visible to its voting population. With the New York Times publishing the fruits of his misdeeds. Some set of American prosecutorial lawyers is confronting this crooked legal hairpin right now. I feel sorry for them.

Sounds like he is a subscriber to the Democratic Peace theory, trademark Immanuel Kant…

Props for using the term Sartrean nausea, btw.

6 Obdicut  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:07:19pm

re: #4 ozbloke

I'm going off of Assange's actual statements.

7 jaunte  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:10:08pm

re: #3 Charles

This is the truest part of Sterling's piece, for me.

It’s the damage to the institutions that is spooky and disheartening; after the Lewinsky eruption, every American politician lives in permanent terror of a sex-outing. That’s “transparency,” too; it’s the kind of ghastly sex-transparency that Julian himself is stuck crotch-deep in. The politics of personal destruction hasn’t made the Americans into a frank and erotically cheerful people. On the contrary, the US today is like some creepy house of incest divided against itself in a civil cold war. “Transparency” can have nasty aspects; obvious, yet denied; spoken, but spoken in whispers. Very Edgar Allen Poe.
8 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:11:46pm
the fearsome Teutonic minions of the Chaos Computer Club

lol

That must sound sarcastic to anyone who has ever been to a Chaos Communication Congress.

9 Usually refered to as anyways  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:14:54pm

re: #6 Obdicut

I'm going off of Assange's actual statements.

Obdi, you may be right, however I suggest that most of his recent statements will be regarding the US, as they are the ones giving him grief.

Lets face it reporters only have two lines of questioning, the US aspect, and the two girls.

10 Obdicut  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:16:13pm

re: #9 ozbloke

I'm talking about statements that predate him being given grief.

11 Usually refered to as anyways  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:18:22pm

re: #10 Obdicut

I'm talking about statements that predate him being given grief.

Well I dont remember them when his focus was Kenya.

As we speak...
http://www.novayagazeta.ru/data/2010/144/13.html

12 Usually refered to as anyways  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:18:55pm

re: #11 ozbloke

Well I dont remember them when his focus was Kenya.

As we speak...
http://www.novayagazeta.ru/data/2010/144/13.html

Charles apologies about the formatting of that link.

13 Usually refered to as anyways  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:22:18pm

Assanges goal according to Assange:

Assange goal is very simple and impossibly naive: to make the world as transparent as possible, to minimize the possibility of any authority to make any decisions without the knowledge of the people.

14 Obdicut  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:25:05pm

re: #13 ozbloke

No, not the world, just the governments.

15 Usually refered to as anyways  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:26:33pm

re: #14 Obdicut

No, not the world, just the governments.

I agree with what you are saying, but I was quoting Assange.

Did you see the read paragraph in that article?

16 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:30:26pm

re: #14 Obdicut

No, not the world, just the governments.

Conspiracies (to which governments belong, but also corporations -- or any associations, for that matter).

I would still disagree with ozbloke, though. It's not about transparency. Transparency is a means to an end, according to Assange:

Let me just talk about transparency for a moment. It is not our goal to achieve a more transparent society; it's our goal to achieve a more just society.

Has any journalist ever asked Assange what his theory of justice is?

17 Obdicut  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:32:07pm

re: #15 ozbloke

That article is in russian.

Or are you talking about a different article?

18 Usually refered to as anyways  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:36:43pm

re: #16 000G

Conspiracies (to which governments belong, but also corporations -- or any associations, for that matter).

I would still disagree with ozbloke, though. It's not about transparency. Transparency is a means to an end, according to Assange:

Has any journalist ever asked Assange what his theory of justice is?


OOOG

These are not my views, I'm quoting Assange.

19 Usually refered to as anyways  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:37:46pm

re: #17 Obdicut

That article is in russian.

Or are you talking about a different article?

I thought everyone read Russian, sorry.
You can translate it, or I can try to find you an English version.

20 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 2:39:04pm

re: #18 ozbloke

OOOG

These are not my views, I'm quoting Assange.

So am I. And I think I represented his views more accurately than you did.

21 Usually refered to as anyways  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 3:07:14pm

re: #19 ozbloke

I thought everyone read Russian, sorry.

Sorry Obdi, I left the sarc tag off.

Here's what the last paragraph says.

Assange said that in the near future, Russian citizens will learn a lot about his country. He's not bluffing. Dispatch of U.S. diplomats - a small portion of the WikiLeaks dossier. Our cooperation will mainly be aimed at exposing the corruption of the highest political strata. Now, none of them protected from the truth.

22 Usually refered to as anyways  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 3:17:25pm

re: #17 Obdicut

That article is in russian.

Or are you talking about a different article?

Heres another one:
Journalists in Norway, Russia get WikiLeaks files

23 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 6:54:29pm
Now, Tim May and his imaginary BlackNet were the sci-fi extrapolation version of the NSA. A sort of inside-out, hippiefied NSA. Crypto people were always keenly aware of the NSA, for the NSA were the people who harassed them for munitions violations and struggled to suppress their academic publications. Creating a BlackNet is like having a pet, desktop NSA. Except, that instead of being a vast, federally-supported nest of supercomputers under a hill in Maryland, it’s a creaky, homemade, zero-budget social-network site for disaffected geeks.

But who cared about that wild notion? Why would that amateurish effort ever matter to real-life people? It’s like comparing a mighty IBM mainframe to some cranky Apple computer made inside a California garage. Yes, it’s almost that hard to imagine.

So Wikileaks is a manifestation of something that this has been growing all around us, for decades, with volcanic inexorability. The NSA is the world’s most public unknown secret agency. And for four years now, its twisted sister Wikileaks has been the world’s most blatant, most publicly praised, encrypted underground site.

Wikileaks is “underground” in the way that the NSA is “covert”; not because it’s inherently obscure, but because it’s discreetly not spoken about.

24 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 6:56:14pm

re: #2 Obdicut

I think he's wrong that Assange doesn't have it in specially for America. We're not just another obnoxious national entity; we're a superpower.

we're the the most interesting target, the biggets target, the most influential target, I definitely believe he has a thing against us, makes perfect sense from all the guy has said

25 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 6:59:30pm
Bradley Manning now shares that exciting, oh my God, Monica Lewinsky, tortured media-freak condition. This mild little nobody has become super-famous, and in his lonely military brig, screenless and without a computer, he’s strictly confined and, no doubt, he’s horribly bored. I don’t want to condone or condemn the acts of Bradley Manning. Because legions of people are gonna do that for me, until we’re all good and sick of it, and then some. I don’t have the heart to make this transgressor into some hockey-puck for an ideological struggle. I sit here and I gloomily contemplate his all-too-modern situation with a sense of Sartrean nausea.
26 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 7:04:08pm
Assange didn’t liberate the dreadful secrets of North Korea, not because the North Koreans lack computers, but because that isn’t a cheap and easy thing that half-a-dozen zealots can do. But the principle of it, the logic of doing it, is the same. Everybody wants everybody else’s national government to leak. Every state wants to see the diplomatic cables of every other state. It will bend heaven and earth to get them. It’s just, that sacred activity is not supposed to be privatized, or, worse yet, made into the no-profit, shareable, have-at-it fodder for a network society, as if global diplomacy were so many mp3s. Now the US State Department has walked down the thorny road to hell that was first paved by the music industry. Rock and roll, baby.

I love me some Bruce Sterling

27 austin_blue  Wed, Dec 22, 2010 9:47:23pm

Okay, Bruce is a friend of mine. Slam his as you will. The basic fact is that a fundamental security lapse allowed these e-mails to be collected, copied, and disseminated.

You might want to blame Assange, but the problem is US communication security. No low level enlisted man should ever have had access to that information.

28 theliel  Thu, Dec 23, 2010 6:06:33am

re: #27 austin_blue

Okay, Bruce is a friend of mine. Slam his as you will. The basic fact is that a fundamental security lapse allowed these e-mails to be collected, copied, and disseminated.

You might want to blame Assange, but the problem is US communication security. No low level enlisted man should ever have had access to that information.

I don't think anyone is slamming Bruce. The only disagreement I saw was whether assange has something against the US specifically or just wants to topple all governments.

I also find it disturbing that they're keepign the leaker in a human Pit of Despair without trial. His guilt seems pretty easy to prove, hurry up and court martial him and get his ass to Levenworth already.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
Best of April 2024 Nothing new here but these are a look back at the a few good images from the past month. Despite the weather, I was quite pleased with several of them. These were taken with older lenses (made from the ...
William Lewis
7 hours ago
Views: 85 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 3
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
3 weeks ago
Views: 371 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1