Ted Cruz Gets a Hilarious Bad Lip Reading Remix
Ted Cruz gets the Bad Lip Reading treatment, and I think this may be one of their all-time greatest remixes, perfectly capturing Ted’s essential creepiness. Side-splitting.
Ted Cruz gets the Bad Lip Reading treatment, and I think this may be one of their all-time greatest remixes, perfectly capturing Ted’s essential creepiness. Side-splitting.
True fact: The fake voice they use for Ted Cruz is more palatable than his real one.
I’d rather listen to anything that Bad Lip Reading has put out from Ted Cruz over anything Ted Cruz has ever actually said.
I like that they really played on the creepy factor of Teddy.
Meanwhile in GOPLand, Priebus & the RNC are just sobbing loudly, desperately begging Trump not to make them rub the lotion on their skin.
— goddamnedfrank (@goddamnedfrank) March 2, 2016
https://t.co/LrEv7DNbY4 @andreagrimes
— Charles Johnson (@Green_Footballs) March 2, 2016
Senate Veterans Cmte on Thursday to hear one bill, dealing with vetera- ha, just kidding, it’s abortion. https://t.co/9ghnNHV9xM ^JC
— Bluegrass Politics (@BGPolitics) March 2, 2016
SB212 (BR1809) - A. Robinson, W. Westerfield, S. West
AN ACT relating to abortion.
Amend KRS 216B.020 to remove abortion facilities from the exemptions for certificate of need; amend KRS 216B.0431 to require abortion facilities to comply with licensure and certificate of need standards required for certain ambulatory surgical centers as applicable to services rendered in an abortion facility by January 1, 2017, unless granted an extension; amend KRS 216B.0435 to require an abortion facility to have a healthcare practioner with admitting privileges at an acute care hospital within 50 miles of the abortion facility where it’s performed by January 1, 2017, unless granted an extension; amend KRS 216B.990 to add a $1,000 per day penalty for an abortion facility who violates the admitting privileges requirement.
Same shit legislation in Texas that SCOTUS heard oral arguments this morning.
Also, I’m starting to wonder if the Kentucky Senate Veterans Committee ever writes any legislation that actually has to do with veterans.
@EricLevitz Thank you! Much appreciated.
— Charles Johnson (@Green_Footballs) March 2, 2016
You don’t have to tell Ben Carson 1,000 times before he takes a hint that he’s not wanted & it’s time to leave. 999 times suffices. #GirlBye
— Mrs. Betty Bowers (@BettyBowers) March 2, 2016
We all saw yesterday Trump’s own ballroom, “regal” CBS called it.
Well, Jalopnik pulled out the 5 year old video of a walk-through of Trump’s plane:
Go Inside Donald Trump’s Classy Private Jet Crammed Full Of Classy Class
re: #9 De Kolta Chair
[Embedded content]
Breaking News! pic.twitter.com/dwa5Pnjaah
— philip harris (@pharris830) March 2, 2016
I could watch that BLR with the sound off and it would still creep me all out.
The whole bit with the former BF/close friend in the kitchen is creepy af.
Re-posting from downstairs, on why Trump not gettign the majority of the delegates is so vital to the GOP, even if nobody else does, either
re: #168 freetoken
538 declares:
Donald Trump Is Just Barely On Track To Win The GOP Nomination
They’re trying very hard to make it seem like Trump is not inevitable.
But when compared to his rivals regard who is “on track”:
Trump is doing far, far better than either Cruz or Rubio.
Right. But watching a discussion on MSNBC last night, where Ben Ginsburg laid out what the GOP can do to prevent Trump winning the nomination, the key part is to deny him an outright win on the first ballot.
If he manages to get enough committed delegates out of the Primaries, that’s it, game over.
But if he’s denied a victory on the first ballot, all bets are off.
So Trump is really only assured of the nomination in the former case. This is why it was actually BAD for the GOP that Rubio didn’t crack 20% in his 3rd place finishes last night. That’s generally the cutoff.
It also suggests that the GOP doesn’t need to back a SINGLE Trumpslayer, but if they’re splitting the anti-Trump vote, they need both players to exceed 20%, or they’re just giving Trump more delegates, because he’ll have won a larger percentage of the votes of all candidates with >20%.
re: #14 Blind Frog Belly White
Well yes, that’s why Colorado GOP changed their rules. They go into the convention uncommitted. It is an attempt to keep Trump from winning a few delegates in CO.
But the blowback would be tremendous, if Trump has a significant plurality and yet the GOP machinery keeps the nomination from him. As even 538 admitted, that would be the GOP elite doing exactly what their detractors have blamed them of doing - not listening to the “base”.
I blame Henry Luce
— David Waldman (@KagroX) March 2, 2016
Two things that also came up in the discussion.
First, Trump is bringing a lot of people to the GOP Primaries, which is scary. But it’s not at all clear how these people will vote on downticket races, AND it’s entirely possible that these aren’t people the GOP really wants. A lot of these folks are real ‘Clean out the barn!” types who might vote against incumbent GOP pols.
Second, although the GOP generally follows along with whoever’s nominated, I don’t think I’ve EVER seen such a level of outright hatred for a frontrunner. Sure, McCain had plenty of detractors and so did Romney, but nothing like THIS! Is it possible that Trump will lose as many votes as he brings in new ones?
Report: Fox News chairman Roger Ailes has turned on Marco Rubio: https://t.co/GVAHH0h1AU pic.twitter.com/YuoJRsiiin
— Media Matters (@mmfa) March 2, 2016
BREAKING: Ben Carson ends Presidential campaign, urges supporters to begin stockpiling grain “in case Trump wins” pic.twitter.com/gp1YUDS6bt
— The Daily Edge (@TheDailyEdge) March 2, 2016
re: #17 Blind Frog Belly White
Second, although the GOP generally follows along with whoever’s nominated, I don’t think I’ve EVER seen such a level of outright hatred for a frontrunner. Sure, McCain had plenty of detractors and so did Romney, but nothing like THIS! Is it possible that Trump will lose as many votes as he brings in new ones?
I think it’s highly probable. It’s suggested by some that Trump might be tapping into a pool of potential voters who very rarely turn out to vote, but this seems inconsistent with what we know about Fox-machine dead-enders who would crawl over broken glass to vote against the Other.
re: #19 Backwoods_Sleuth
[Embedded content]
As we say goodbye to Ben Carson, enjoy his Greatest Hitlers! pic.twitter.com/2SmlzE8uPe
— CAFE (@cafedotcom) March 2, 2016
re: #11 freetoken
We all saw yesterday Trump’s own ballroom, “regal” CBS called it.
Well, Jalopnik pulled out the 5 year old video of a walk-through of Trump’s plane:
Go Inside Donald Trump’s Classy Private Jet Crammed Full Of Classy Class
[Embedded content]
I guess he designed his own family crest? gag what a pretentious waste of money.
re: #15 freetoken
Well yes, that’s why Colorado GOP changed their rules. They go into the convention uncommitted. It is an attempt to keep Trump from winning a few delegates in CO.
But the blowback would be tremendous, if Trump has a significant plurality and yet the GOP machinery keeps the nomination from him. As even 538 admitted, that would be the GOP elite doing exactly what their detractors have blamed them of doing - not listening to the “base”.
It depends on just how bad they think Trump as the nominee would be. Do enough of the GOP think that Trump would have such a catastrophic effect on the GOP that letting him win would be worse than stopping him? If he bolts the party and runs as an independent, Hillary wins. If they let him be the nominee, many fear, Hillary wins anyway, but the GOP becomes Trump’s.
re: #18 Charles Johnson
[Embedded content]
Where have you gone, Marco Rubio?
Fox Nation turns its lonely eyes to you.
WooWooWoo.
re: #15 freetoken
Well yes, that’s why Colorado GOP changed their rules. They go into the convention uncommitted. It is an attempt to keep Trump from winning a few delegates in CO.
But the blowback would be tremendous, if Trump has a significant plurality and yet the GOP machinery keeps the nomination from him. As even 538 admitted, that would be the GOP elite doing exactly what their detractors have blamed them of doing - not listening to the “base”.
If the GOP establishment does this, there would be a GOP civil war.
I’m failing to see any downside here, so please proceed, establishment.
re: #17 Blind Frog Belly White
Two things that also came up in the discussion.
First, Trump is bringing a lot of people to the GOP Primaries, which is scary. But it’s not at all clear how these people will vote on downticket races, AND it’s entirely possible that these aren’t people the GOP really wants. A lot of these folks are real ‘Clean out the barn!” types who might vote against incumbent GOP pols.
Second, although the GOP generally follows along with whoever’s nominated, I don’t think I’ve EVER seen such a level of outright hatred for a frontrunner. Sure, McCain had plenty of detractors and so did Romney, but nothing like THIS! Is it possible that Trump will lose as many votes as he brings in new ones?
I agree that the level of opposition to Trump within the GOP is unprecedented within at least the last 25 years. Perhaps Rockefeller vs. Goldwater was comparable in intensity, but that is before my time.
I think Trump will lose a % or two of the Republican base over this if he is the nominee.
re: #18 Charles Johnson
“We’re finished with Rubio,” says Fox News chief Roger Ailes: https://t.co/2bNsx9ayci pic.twitter.com/VUehx0NE5s
— New York Magazine (@NYMag) March 2, 2016
re: #6 Charles Johnson
That cat obviously was unwilling to end its spa day.
re: #23 Blind Frog Belly White
It depends on just how bad they think Trump as the nominee would be.
The likes of Sen. Sasse are pretty clear that they will not vote for Trump at all. The anti-Trump movement will just as much doom the GOP as much as Trump splitting off and doing a 3rd party run.
In the end, each local elected official will do what is best for their own campaign. Which means many Republican Senators and Congressmen will either run from the GOP nominee, or they will desperately cling to whoever it may be (other than Trump.)
The Presidency ought to be a cake walk for the Democrats, but unfortunately their candidate has almost as significant negatives as Trump.
re: #27 teleskiguy
So Ailes is going to put his entire establishment behind Cruz?
Does Ailes really think Cruz can win? Seriously?
I strongly suspect that Ailes would rather have Clinton win, as it would be good for his network.
Oh Rage Furby! Never change, you goofy whack job. pic.twitter.com/DPzfUCCthN
— Charles Johnson (@Green_Footballs) March 2, 2016
re: #29 freetoken
The likes of Sen. Sasse are pretty clear that they will not vote for Trump at all. The anti-Trump movement will just as much doom the GOP as much as Trump splitting off and doing a 3rd party run.
In the end, each local elected official will do what is best for their own campaign. Which means many Republican Senators and Congressmen will either run from the GOP nominee, or they will desperately cling to whoever it may be (other than Trump.)
The Presidency ought to be a cake walk for the Democrats, but unfortunately their candidate has almost as significant negatives as Trump.
If you are referring to Clinton’s favorable/unfavorable polling, these numbers are what they are, but at least they are not likely to significantly change.
Trump, on the other hand, hasn’t really had a general election level spotlight on him yet. There ought to be plenty of room to drive his numbers more negative.
re: #31 Charles Johnson
You just know that CCJ isn’t actually doing any work or research here. He’s just polishing his “bombshell”, obsessively making meaningless edits.
Trump Son Says He Didn’t Mean to Speak to Pro-Slavery Radio Host https://t.co/cv4lO7V86r
— Bloomberg Politics (@bpolitics) March 2, 2016
“This is clearly the mainstream media trying to turn a story into nothing — much like they did with my father, who I witnessed denouncing David Duke and any KKK endorsement on multiple occasions,” the younger Trump says.
re: #33 EPR-radar
You just know that CCJ isn’t actually doing any work or research here. He’s just polishing his “bombshell”, obsessively making meaningless edits.
He waited too long. It looks like Ailes just took the ‘kill shot.’
It was probably another quarter-pound nothingburger, anyway.
I suspect a Dim Jim style headline followed by a big nothing-burger.
Where is Ben Carson right now?
“On his knees, deep in prayer,” according to former Carson Iowa State Chair Rob Taylor.— Benny (@bennyjohnson) March 2, 2016
Yeah, that should help.
re: #35 makeitstop
He waited too long. It looks like Ailes just took the ‘kill shot.’
It was probably another quarter-pound nothingburger, anyway.
Ailes has power. CCJ does not. They operate in completely different worlds.
re: #38 EPR-radar
Ailes has power. CCJ does not. They operate in completely different worlds.
Kind of my point. CCJ, no matter what he publishes, isn’t ‘ending’ anything at this point. Ailes has effectively ended Rubio if the reports are true.
re: #38 EPR-radar
Technically, the kill shot was administered by Trump, but Ailes can take the credit if he chooses for the mercy killing. Winning all but four states kinda gives Trump the advantage.
Rubio managed to pull out a win in MN.
If there’s a takeaway, it’s that Palin’s endorsement didn’t help Trump in Alaska. But that inures benefit to Cruz, not Rubio.
re: #31 Charles Johnson
UpChuck has grainy screenshots of pictures of receipts for gay porn that Rubio purchased in college. BOMBSHELL BREAKING EXCLUSIVE ZOMG!!!
That’s actually a great idea. Will pass that along to the right people. :-) https://t.co/aPFvib4ZA1
— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) March 2, 2016
@mitchellvii Trump’s people should call press conference right after Romney’s speech & play the video of Romney praising Trump themselves
— Jane Spillane (@jane_spillane) March 2, 2016
re: #29 freetoken
The likes of Sen. Sasse are pretty clear that they will not vote for Trump at all. The anti-Trump movement will just as much doom the GOP as much as Trump splitting off and doing a 3rd party run.
In the end, each local elected official will do what is best for their own campaign. Which means many Republican Senators and Congressmen will either run from the GOP nominee, or they will desperately cling to whoever it may be (other than Trump.)
The Presidency ought to be a cake walk for the Democrats, but unfortunately their candidate has almost as significant negatives as Trump.
I think the differences in negatives are important. Clinton’s are a result of 30 years fear mongering from the GOP. Trump owns all of his.
Virtually every Clinton “scandal” is down to GOP innuendo and are on the whole unsubstantiated. Look at Benghazi. All the scandal is that there must be something there. All evidence, all the inquiries, all the hearings…nada. But it leaves a taste that if “everyone” is talking abnout there must be a fire somewhere. Trumps are generally well documented and irrefutable.
Funny that the head of Fox News is openly discussing which GOP candidate his network will support. We don’t even blink.
— David Roberts (@drvox) March 2, 2016
re: #36 Amory Blaine
I suspect a Dim Jim style headline followed by a big nothing-burger.
It was another bid for moolah so he can take HAW in another vaca.
re: #41 lawhawk
Technically, the kill shot was administered by Trump, but Ailes can take the credit if he chooses for the mercy killing. Winning all but four states kinda gives Trump the advantage.
Rubio managed to pull out a win in MN.
If there’s a takeaway, it’s that Palin’s endorsement didn’t help Trump in Alaska. But that inures benefit to Cruz, not Rubio.
Who won Alaska? Cruz?
re: #17 Blind Frog Belly White
Two things that also came up in the discussion.
First, Trump is bringing a lot of people to the GOP Primaries, which is scary. But it’s not at all clear how these people will vote on downticket races, AND it’s entirely possible that these aren’t people the GOP really wants. A lot of these folks are real ‘Clean out the barn!” types who might vote against incumbent GOP pols.
Second, although the GOP generally follows along with whoever’s nominated, I don’t think I’ve EVER seen such a level of outright hatred for a frontrunner. Sure, McCain had plenty of detractors and so did Romney, but nothing like THIS! Is it possible that Trump will lose as many votes as he brings in new ones?
I heard earlier that Trump is not doing well with identified Republican voters. He is doing very well with the independents. That would also show he is bringing ‘new’ voters but no guarantee they would be actual Republicans after the elections. I think that also means they are not interested in down ticket GOP candidates.
re: #50 lawhawk
Yup. Cruz won Alaska.
Must have been all that small government. // I do like that though. A nice FU to Palin even though Cruz is no prize.
re: #49 ObserverArt
I heard earlier that Trump is not doing well with identified Republican voters. He is doing very well with the independents. That would also show he is bringing ‘new’ voters but no guarantee they would be actual Republicans after the elections. I think that also means they are not interested in down ticket GOP candidates.
Also plays into the idea that if Cruz/Robot/Kasich drop out he will get a share of their votes in the Primary. I’m sort of leaning towards the idea that anyone who would vote for Trump is.
Of course in the general the GOP will fall in line like a school kid in a Pink Floyd video
No surprise here. But why did major media wait until now to start doing this sort of basic reporting?https://t.co/yRCXjfi6qN
— Jim Meigs (@jamesbmeigs) March 2, 2016
Welcome to the next great GOP conspiracy - that the media didn’t properly cover Trump overstating his wealth.
Except for all the times that Fortune and WSJ indicated exactly that - emphatically so.
Trump’s FEC filings also indicates that his wealth isn’t what it seems. And Trump repeatedly stated that his wealth is tied to how he feels about his brand in any given day. In other words, Trump’s statement on his worth being in the billions is not even tangentially related to GAAP or normal tax computations.
His tax records would probably indicate wealth a fraction of what he claims.
It’s just another lie. But the right wing thinks that there’s a conspiracy here too - that someone was holding back on this? Those people just haven’t been paying attention.
Out of curiosity, I found the first NYT reference to Adolf Hitler. Nov. 21, 1922. Amazing last three paragraphs. pic.twitter.com/VhBnlSsfNm
— Jon Ostrower (@jonostrower) March 2, 2016
re: #18 Charles Johnson
[Embedded content]
We knew FOX was an extension of the GOP, but it is always fun to see they are brash enough to admit they play favorites and generally push their “fair and balanced news” in favor of the party.
Great example of modern journalism.
re: #54 Charles Johnson
[Embedded content]
It’s amazing how many people thought the Anti-Semitism was just for show. Worse is how many people accepted it due to the accepted Antisemitic prejudices that existed in Europe and the U.S during that time period. Downright eerie to read that knowing what happens.
interesting pretzel logic comment on Sarah Palin’s FB page from a North Carolina Christian justifying her own Trump support:
“This isn’t the yr for morals people.”
welp, guessing morals ain’t all that big a deal after all.
edited to fix typo
re: #57 Backwoods_Sleuth
interesting pretzel logic comment on Sarah Palin’s FB page from a North Carolina Christian justifying her own Trump support:
“This is the yr for morals people.”
welp, guessing morals ain’t all that big a deal after all.
Protect Israel? I believe Herr Drumpf hasn’t offered much support for Israel.
re: #37 Charles Johnson
[Embedded content]
Yeah, that should help.
Sorry doctor Carson, god only talks to Ted Cruz now.
Honestly what I’m seeing from many conservative Christians is that hate matters more than morals anyhow. It doesn’t matter that Trump is an amoral asshole. He shares their hate and that’s good enough.
re: #58 HappyWarrior
Protect Israel? I believe Herr Drumpf hasn’t offered much support for Israel.
Louis Farrakhan praised Donald Trump. These are real events that are really happening. https://t.co/gkgB6q3qA3 pic.twitter.com/BN6AOYnaxA
— The Daily Show (@TheDailyShow) March 2, 2016
re: #57 Backwoods_Sleuth
interesting pretzel logic comment on Sarah Palin’s FB page from a North Carolina Christian justifying her own Trump support:
“This isn’t the yr for morals people.”
welp, guessing morals ain’t all that big a deal after all.
edited to fix typo
Morals are flexible. Very flexible. Gymnast flexible. Silly putty flexible. Slinky …
Well, you get my meaning.
re: #58 HappyWarrior
You know the drill by now: any Israel reference is in anticipation of ticking off certain actions these folks view as signs that the end of the world is starting.
That’s part of why they don’t care about the morals of elected officials. They only thing that matter is triggering the Rapture…which will amply demonstrate who’s really moral.
@Stonekettle ANGRY AT WHAT? For what? You all weren’t angry when Bush lied, started 2 wars, slept on 911 and created ISIS but NOW you angry?
— OLIVIA FOX (@Oliviafoxradio) March 2, 2016
Really? You aim THIS stupid shit at ME? Of all people? REALLY?
I may start drinking early today https://t.co/kQAsTkwt0Q— Stonekettle (@Stonekettle) March 2, 2016
@Oliviafoxradio Maybe you should take a cursory look around at the social media landscape of @Stonekettle before tweeting.
— McSix (@McLeanSix) March 2, 2016
Republican foreign policy experts set to issue harsh attack on #Trump - https://t.co/IHga0hJmsP https://t.co/DhhRc5e404 via @FT
— Barbara Plett (@BBCBarbaraPlett) March 2, 2016
Several dozen prominent Republican foreign policy experts are poised to issue a harsh attack on Donald Trump as the property developer closes in on the party’s presidential nomination.
The critique will be published in the form of a letter whose signatories include Robert Zoellick, the former deputy secretary of state who has been advising Jeb Bush.
(The link in the tweet bumped me up against a paywall, but this one got me around it)
re: #65 The Ghost of Bork Bork Bork Bork
I love your current nic.
You’ll leave it that way until we have 9 justices again, right?
re: #65 The Ghost of Bork Bork Bork Bork
You know the drill by now: any Israel reference is in anticipation of ticking off certain actions these folks view as signs that the end of the world is starting.
That’s part of why they don’t care about the morals of elected officials. They only things that matter is triggering the Rapture…which will amply demonstrate who’s really moral.
Oh of course. The Israel shit has always been lip service. See, Trump’s endorser Pat Robertson being gleeful when Ariel Sharon had a stroke.
re: #69 wrenchwench
I love your current nic.
You’ll leave it that way until we have 9 justices again, right?
I second this emotion.
If your plan to win the nomination is a brokered convention, you don’t really have a plan
— Dan Pfeiffer (@danpfeiffer) March 2, 2016
re: #65 The Ghost of Bork Bork Bork Bork
You know the drill by now: any Israel reference is in anticipation of ticking off certain actions these folks view as signs that the end of the world is starting.
That’s part of why they don’t care about the morals of elected officials. They only things that matter is triggering the Rapture…which will amply demonstrate who’s really moral.
I’d love to see the most obnoxious of these types get ‘raptured’ in big clouds of sulfurous smoke to join their Lord and Master in Hell.
Bonus points if it happens one by one so we could see the religious right propaganda machine try to explain how big clouds of sulfurous smoke are now a sign of divine grace.
It’s weird watching people’s heads spin around the Drumpfbeat of Inevitability.
The GOP is testing the waters on dumping Trump and working convention voodoo to back somebody else (probably Cruz). Can we get away with this? Oh wait, we’re backed by money, and don’t give a shit about actual Americans! I bet we can do this.
“Moderate” conservative-inclined Hillary haters are convincing themselves that Trump is a decent human being and will be better than a Clinton in office. He’s obviously anti-social and uncooperative, but anything is better than Hillary “Satan” Clinton.
Some Trump fans are edging back, saying “Hey yeah, I didn’t really mean all that stuff about him being the best guy up there… But isn’t this fun? I just like how he stirs shit up!” Oh my god, my vote has consequences and this guy might really be in charge of stuff. Is that good? I’m not even sure anymore.
Bernie-heads are sulking in the corner. Why did all these fucking idiots vote for Hitlery? She’s just a corporate whore, just like the Republicans! Fuck everybody!
It’s very easy for the Democrat establishment to fall into the trap of thinking they have this nailed and that they can just surf on to the Presidency. However I think they vastly underestimate the sheer magnitude of Hillary Hate out there. Yes, Virginia, people WILL vote for a thoughtless, thuggish egomaniac cartoon character, because they hate Hillary’s guts now and forever.
If the Dems want Hillary to win they need to unify and start working NOW, and don’t slack off until the election is won.
re: #69 wrenchwench
I love your current nic.
You’ll leave it that way until we have 9 justices again, right?
You mean, until five years from now?
I’m not sure my fancy will stay faithful that long.
ETA: I am a sucker for Swedish Chef references, though.
MSNBC loses Melissa Harris Perry & gets Rick Tyler. Kind of like when they lost Keith Olbermann & got Michael Steele. #TalkingPointsNetwork
— Robert C. Keating (@RobertCKeating) March 2, 2016
Still dreaming…
A Cruz-Rubio tickets makes the most sense right now. Pair up, announce the deal, let Rubio win Florida, get to convention and make it so.
— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) March 2, 2016
re: #75 The Ghost of Bork Bork Bork Bork
You mean, until five years from now?
I’m not sure my fancy will stay faithful that long.
Retaking the Senate in 2016 seems to be a decent stretch goal for the Democrats.
re: #34 teleskiguy
[Embedded content]
“This is clearly the mainstream media trying to turn a story into nothing
So young Don is accusing the media of turning a mountain into a molehill, eh?
re: #66 Backwoods_Sleuth
[Embedded content]
There it is. Say something fucking stupid on Twitter … then delete your tweets and hope nobody got a screencap. Jesus Christ.
— Stonekettle (@Stonekettle) March 2, 2016
re: #34 teleskiguy
“This is clearly the mainstream media trying to turn a story into nothing
I don’t think that’s what he meant to say. Trump Jr. seems a little dim.
Now I’m thinking about the Swedish Chef getting grilled for a SC seat.
re: #81 Backwoods_Sleuth
[Embedded content]
There it is. Say something fucking stupid on Twitter … then delete your tweets and hope nobody got a screencap. Jesus Christ.
— Stonekettle (@Stonekettle) March 2, 2016
@Stonekettle you tweeted me with your no class having self. Sounds like anger motivated by zero sex life
— OLIVIA FOX (@Oliviafoxradio) March 2, 2016
re: #77 Backwoods_Sleuth
Still dreaming…
[Embedded content]
It’ll be (snaps fingers) just like that!
Oh well, the GOP has been known for dirty political tricks. I guess we are going to see if they are going to start going down that road on one of their own candidates.
re: #74 Pawn of the Oppressor
The Dems can’t do anything now. There are still two candidates in the running.
I get what you’re saying but this is the process; primary, convention, nominee. Until one goes away there’s little to be done.
re: #85 Backwoods_Sleuth
Does she understand who she is messing with? Shit.
re: #89 Eclectic Cyborg
Does she understand who she is messing with? Shit.
Obviously not. She gon’ learn today.
re: #78 EPR-radar
Retaking the Senate in 2016 seems to be a decent stretch goal for the Democrats.
I think it’s a realistic goal if Trump is on the ticket. Link the GOP candidates to Trump.
re: #89 Eclectic Cyborg
Does she understand who she is messing with? Shit.
Better question is why is she messing with him?
“I like chocolate!”
“I like chocolate more! You’re an asshole!”
“Huh?”
Exactly.
re: #86 ObserverArt
It’ll be (snaps fingers) just like that!
Oh well, the GOP has been known for dirty political tricks. I guess we are going to see if they are going to start going down that road on one of their own candidates.
I think if they do that. They’ll get a good amount staying home. The exit polls indicate to me that a lot of the GOP electorate is disgusted with their own party. Pulling a stunt like that would infuriate them.
Damn, I cannot wait for Republican senators to come to the conclusion that they might have to rally around their good friend and loyal colleague Ted Cruz.
Sarah says she picked 7 of 11 winners last night.
You all know what that means, right?
It’s Grifting Time Again!
Friend,
Governor Palin picks winners and last night her choice for President of the United States won 7 out of 11 Super Tuesday states. However, many of the winners she picks aren’t always in the spotlight like Donald Trump.
Many of the candidates she endorses are underdogs. They face uphill battles against highly funded establishment candidates and through the power of Palin, they win!
That is why it is crucial that we raise $2,500 before the next primary!
We must [sic] the Governor across the country to find these special candidates that will send the establishment a message.
Will you kindly donate $25 to support the SarahPAC Conservative Congressional Candidate Fund? Each time you donate $25 you will be entered to win an autographed copy of Gov. Sarah Palin’s newest book, Sweet Freedom: A Devotional. The winner will be announced next Friday. So be sure to enter before time runs out.
It [sic] so important that we elect strong conservative candidates in Congress to support our next president who will defund Obamacare, secure the border, and support our military and it’s [sic] veterans who are constantly ignored by the VA!
Voter turnout results are pointing to a HUGE conservative victory, but we CAN’T just elect the same establishment Congress year after year and expect change. Donate $25 today and be the change that ushers in a real conservative victory!
Best,
SarahPAC
re: #96 Testy Toad T
Damn, I cannot wait for Republican senators to come to the conclusion that they might have to rally around their good friend and loyal colleague Ted Cruz.
We’ll know the time has come when a huge order of alcohol arrives at Capital Hill.
re: #96 Testy Toad T
Damn, I cannot wait for Republican senators to come to the conclusion that they might have to rally around their good friend and loyal colleague Ted Cruz.
Lindsay Graham said last night not even a week after he said that pretty much you could murder the guy and none of the Senate Republicans would care. What a mess. This is such just desserts for the GOP. Even if they do somehow nominate Rubio, he’s not going to be seen as legit.
re: #78 EPR-radar
Retaking the Senate in 2016 seems to be a decent stretch goal for the Democrats.
Speaking of. This just hit my mailbox.
The Koch brothers’ network just unleashed its FIRST political ad of 2016 - $700,000 to defeat Catherine Cortez Masto in Nevada and keep the GOP Senate!
Weeeeeeee.
re: #98 Targetpractice
We’ll know the time has come when a huge order of alcohol arrives at Capital Hill.
Boehner’s not busy these days is he?
Maybe I should apply for a passport soon, likely to be a backlog
“Move to Canada” Google searches spike after #SuperTuesday - @CBSNLive https://t.co/L2U5HCVTwx pic.twitter.com/Nku2wawGYh
— CBS News (@CBSNews) March 3, 2016
re: #100 MsJ
Speaking of. This just hit my mailbox.
Weeeeeeee.
Is Ms. Masto the Democratic candidate to replace Reid? Be nice if that seat could be kept in good hands.
re: #97 Skip Intro
She needs $2500 dollars? That’s it? Seems unlikely somehow.
That moment when you realise 2 weeks ago you were running for President & now you’re a stand in for Sarah Palin… pic.twitter.com/yfJl8viVji
— Richard Morris (@richardmorrisuk) March 2, 2016
re: #101 HappyWarrior
Boehner’s not busy these days is he?
Don’t know, does drinking oneself into a stupor count as busy?
re: #95 HappyWarrior
I think if they do that. They’ll get a good amount staying home. The exit polls indicate to me that a lot of the GOP electorate is disgusted with their own party. Pulling a stunt like that would infuriate them.
This is the best explanation of why. The GOP earned it.
re: #102 FormerDirtDart
Maybe I should apply for a passport soon, likely to be a backlog
[Embedded content]
President Trump will build a YUGE wall to keep people from fleeing.
re: #106 Targetpractice
Don’t know, does drinking oneself into a stupor count as busy?
I think part of him is really enjoying this. I imagine if he’s for anyone, it’s Kasich. Art, BD, help me out here but when Kasich was in Congress, how far was his district from boehner’s? I have to imagine the two are close.
re: #97 Skip Intro
Sarah couldn’t deliver Alaska…
re: #104 calochortus
She needs $2500 dollars? That’s it? Seems unlikely somehow.
It’s from Palin, and it’s full of typos.
“We are the granddaughters of the witches they forgot to burn.” https://t.co/fownL8m2Uv #midwifery pic.twitter.com/nehyvcH64s
— RH Reality Check (@rhrealitycheck) March 3, 2016
Under 3 minutes of video.
re: #103 HappyWarrior
Is Ms. Masto the Democratic candidate to replace Reid? Be nice if that seat could be kept in good hands.
Pretty sure that’s correct.
re: #106 Targetpractice
Don’t know, does drinking oneself into a stupor count as busy?
More like thanking his lucky stars he got out. He probably thought the insouciance, obstruction and pettiness couldn’t have gotten much worse. He’s likely LHAO.
re: #83 Skip Intro
I don’t think that’s what he meant to say. Trump Jr. seems a little dim.
The acorn doesn’t fall far from the tree, right?
re: #104 calochortus
She needs $2500 dollars? That’s it? Seems unlikely somehow.
Is that bond for one of her spawn?
re: #97 Skip Intro
“Gov. Sarah Palin’s newest book, Sweet Freedom: A Devotional”
This is the kind of thing that make satirists unemployed.
re: #118 Pawn of the Oppressor
Is that bond for one of her spawn?
More likely just fishing for folks to scam later.
re: #109 HappyWarrior
I think part of him is really enjoying this. I imagine if he’s for anyone, it’s Kasich. Art, BD, help me out here but when Kasich was in Congress, how far was his district from boehner’s? I have to imagine the two are close.
Boehner, southern Ohio—closer to Cincinnati; Kasich, central—Columbus. Don’t really know if they were/are close. My gut says no, because while Boehner can be an asshole, he seems like a more sociable kind of guy and Kasich is just a flat out dick.
re: #116 MsJ
That. Was. Fucking. Awesome.
Thank you for sharing.
I just watched it a second time. Now I can go home. Later, lizards.
re: #110 Backwoods_Sleuth
Sarah couldn’t deliver Alaska…
Obviously not one of the state’s she predicted!
/ Well…it did say she picked right in 7 out of 11.
re: #22 Stanley Sea
I guess he designed his own family crest? gag what a pretentious waste of money.
I made the mistake of reading some of the comments from Trump supporters, which are what you would expect from their negative level of intellect:
HURR HURR HE HAS A PRIVATE JET & BILLIONS DOLLARS!!!! UR JUST JEALOUS HE HAS ALL TEH MONEYS & A HOT WIFE, JEALOUS LIBTARD!!! HE EARNED IT FROM TEH HARD WORKS!!!!! SWEAT EQUITY & WORK ETHICS!!!!! NOT LIKE UR OBUMMER GIMME FREE STUFFS!!!!!