Federal Appeals Court Rules That Trump Can Accept Bribes

Politics • Views: 19,680

YouTube

Donald Trump has won a major court case, and is now free to take as many bribes from foreign governments as he likes. The District of Columbia and Maryland will probably appeal to the Supreme Court — a Supreme Court stacked with right wing operatives.

There is another way to hold this criminal administration accountable, but Democratic leaders don’t seem interested in doing that.

Jump to bottom

56 comments
1
Targetpractice  Jul 10, 2019 • 10:54:05am

Here we are, exactly where we were promised we wouldn’t end up when the Dems won the House: Watching as Trump continues to act with total impunity, while the leadership sits around with the thumbs up their collective asses, scared into inaction by their own damned shadows.

2
Wendell Zurkowitz ((slave to the waffle light))  Jul 10, 2019 • 10:57:10am

There is another way to hold this criminal administration accountable, but Democratic leaders don’t seem interested in doing that.

Because impeaching him without a chance of convicting him is handing him another victory.

3
Mike Lamb  Jul 10, 2019 • 10:57:31am

I guess I’d have to read the opinion, but who would have standing to enforce the Emoluments Clause, if not Maryland or DC (or some other gov’t entity)? Can I bring the suit? Someone has to be able to enforce the provision or it’s completely superfluous.

4
lawhawk  Jul 10, 2019 • 10:57:34am

Charles,

There’s still the Congressional emoluments suit still pending/active, but experts had considered the states case to be the stronger one.

The way this is going, the courts are going to claim that no one but Congress can hold Trump accountable, and if the Senate is controlled by the same party as the WH, then the president is above the law.

5
marcusgorillius  Jul 10, 2019 • 10:57:44am

Winning the house hasn’t meant a fucking thing. Unbelievable

6
Love-Child of Cassandra and Sisyphus  Jul 10, 2019 • 10:58:24am

It really is up to Congress now to start the investigation into emoluments.

7
Charles Johnson  Jul 10, 2019 • 10:59:05am
8
Targetpractice  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:00:54am

re: #2 Wendell Zurkowitz ((slave to the waffle light))

There is another way to hold this criminal administration accountable, but Democratic leaders don’t seem interested in doing that.

Because impeaching him without a chance of convicting him is handing him another victory.

It’s a false choice to say that we must either impeach or continue to take no action. Commencing impeachment hearings and dragging his ass through the mud for months is something worth doing and the fact that the leadership continues to resist it is a damning indictment of their cowardice.

9
Charles Johnson  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:01:03am
10
marcusgorillius  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:01:41am

re: #6 Love-Child of Cassandra and Sisyphus

Congress won’t do anything, Trump is making a mockery of this country in front of the whole world.

11
I Would Prefer Not To  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:02:54am

re: #2 Wendell Zurkowitz ((slave to the waffle light))

There is another way to hold this criminal administration accountable, but Democratic leaders don’t seem interested in doing that.

Because impeaching him without a chance of convicting him is handing him another victory.

No it’s not. It’s making all the evidence public and letting the chips fall were they may. Until the evidence is introduced to the public trump wins.

12
lawhawk  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:03:06am

re: #2 Wendell Zurkowitz ((slave to the waffle light))

There is another way to hold this criminal administration accountable, but Democratic leaders don’t seem interested in doing that.

Because impeaching him without a chance of convicting him is handing him another victory.

Putting the GOP on the record as defending clear criminal conduct has value…. and has to be weighed against Trump claiming exoneration.

Of course McConnell has already said that he’d never allow a removal to come for a vote - showing that he doesn’t care about the rule of law. McGrath should remind everyone of that as well.

13
jaunte  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:04:33am
14
lawhawk  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:08:18am

re: #13 jaunte

1. Because Trump is involved in some fashion directly (he’s one of those associates named in the indictment, or was involved in the earlier FL prosecution deal).
2. Because Trump doesn’t want to be seen as caving/losing by firing Acosta.
3. Because Trump doesn’t want to admit he was wrong (by firing Acosta) being competent.
4. Because it shows that Trump doesn’t know how to vet anyone for any position in government.
5. Because Trump doesn’t care about vetting; it’s about Trump showing that he’s never wrong and never knuckles to any pressure, no matter how awful the situation.

15
Eclectic Cyborg  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:10:13am

Pelosi could get a news conference together in less than an hour and say they’re going to start impeachment proceedings against the motherfucker.

Can someone give me ANY good reason to NOT do this?

16
marcusgorillius  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:10:21am

Impeach him, drag every republican you can through the process for the whole world to see. Make them defend him on the record. At least you could say you tried. Good God, whats it going to take!?

17
jaunte  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:11:11am
18
jaunte  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:11:32am
19
lawhawk  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:13:23am

NY Post award for the best headline of the day:

20
Decatur Deb  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:18:26am

re: #15 Eclectic Cyborg

Pelosi could get a news conference together in less than an hour and say they’re going to start impeachment proceedings against the motherfucker.

Can someone give me ANY good reason to NOT do this?

Pelosi has been at this more than 40 hours a week for more than 30 years. I’m going to go with her skills and instincts on this.

21
jaunte  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:19:17am
22
Eclectic Cyborg  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:20:52am

re: #17 jaunte

“Only the best people.”

23
lawhawk  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:24:08am

re: #21 jaunte

The deal was done BEFORE OBAMA WAS PRESIDENT. Epstein’s plea deal dates to before Barack Obama was inaugurated.

That’s just bulkshit from right wingers trying to deflect from GOP and Trump connections.

24
Dread Pirate  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:24:28am
25
Charles Johnson  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:26:37am
26
steve_davis  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:27:24am

re: #15 Eclectic Cyborg

Pelosi could get a news conference together in less than an hour and say they’re going to start impeachment proceedings against the motherfucker.

Can someone give me ANY good reason to NOT do this?

because none of this occurred while he was in the trump administration, and there’s some kind of common law belief that you don’t get impeached for stuff you did while you weren’t in office.

27
MsJ  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:27:43am

Can anyone see the Twitter embed controls? I can only click into the tweet via Twitter to RT it.

28
marcusgorillius  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:28:22am

I’m sitting in the hospital with my wife who is being treated for complications of chemotherapy, I’m reading the comments on LGF about what’s happening to this country and I just find everything hard to believe. Sometimes life sucks. I know it’s better than the alternative but it still suck.

29
Targetpractice  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:28:26am

re: #25 Charles Johnson

[Embedded content]

Not sure which is funnier: Ben whining that the WH publicly disinvited him, or insisting he can’t be antisemitic because “I have Jewish friends!”

30
Charles Johnson  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:29:34am
31
Eclectic Cyborg  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:31:06am

The Republican Presidential playbook hasn’t changed much over the years, has it?

- Tax breaks for rich people and corporations
- Destroy environmental protections
- Fossil fuels are king
- Give the military ridiculous amounts of money
- Screw people on health care
- Send troops to the Middle East at some point
- Balloon the national debt

32
lawhawk  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:31:26am

re: #30 Charles Johnson

Self identifying deplorable should get the airlock, but shit up? Is that possible?

33
Eclectic Cyborg  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:31:41am

re: #29 Targetpractice

Not sure which is funnier: Ben whining that the WH publicly disinvited him, or insisting he can’t be antisemitic because “I have Jewish friends!”

Narrator: Antisemites can, in fact, have Jewish friends.

34
DangerMan  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:31:52am

re: #2 Wendell Zurkowitz ((slave to the waffle light))

There is another way to hold this criminal administration accountable, but Democratic leaders don’t seem interested in doing that.

Because impeaching him without a chance of convicting him is handing him another victory.

In simple terms the jury pool is rigged and it wouldn’t be prudent to hold out hopes that they are at all persuadable

35
lawhawk  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:32:09am

So, I posted the following this morning on twitter. The responses to it are absolutely heartbreaking:

36
BigPapa  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:32:32am

re: #30 Charles Johnson

Shit up
shit down
shit up shit down and all around

37
MsJ  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:32:32am

re: #33 Eclectic Cyborg

Narrator: Antisemites can, in fact, have Jewish friends.

Often labeled (as I was by one of my closest childhood friends) as not a Jewy Jew.

38
jaunte  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:32:42am

re: #24 Dread Pirate

Thinking of all those employers who failed to pay me before I was hired, and nodding.

39
Charles Johnson  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:33:04am
40
Charles Johnson  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:33:41am
41
jaunte  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:36:05am
42
BigPapa  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:36:28am

For the record you cannot shit up. You can only shit down.

If you have to shit up you need to shat.

According to a friend.

43
marcusgorillius  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:36:51am

re: #39 Charles Johnson

Pence smirking in the back ground. Can’t stand the self righteous prick

44
Charles Johnson  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:38:01am
45
I Would Prefer Not To  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:38:36am

re: #20 Decatur Deb

Pelosi has been at this more than 40 hours a week for more than 30 years. I’m going to go with her skills and instincts on this.

1) She’s not perfect
2) She is not giving a good enough reason to not move forward. She may have a plan, but how would we know?
3) Eventually she’s going to lose support from people who can’t take this much longer.
4) Investigating child rapists and human rights violations that are taking place in our country is part her fucking job.

I supported her for speaker, but my support is wearing thin, very thin.

46
DangerMan  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:39:12am

re: #29 Targetpractice

Not sure which is funnier: Ben whining that the WH publicly disinvited him, or insisting he can’t be antisemitic because “I have Jewish friends!”

He been talking to Roy Moore?

47
Eclectic Cyborg  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:39:31am

re: #39 Charles Johnson

Yep, we’ve reached Stephen King territory here.

48
Dr Lizardo  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:40:27am

re: #39 Charles Johnson

the acostas couldn’t look more like a strict christian family with dark secrets if they tried

And now the song “Dear Abby” from the Dead Kennedys popped into my head.

Dear Abby
Got a problem…

I’m a decent, underpaid, hard-working county coroner
It’s important that my family eats meat at least three times a week
But we just can’t afford to with prices the way they are
So I bring home some choice cuts from my autopsy subjects

Just mix in the Tuna Helper and ta-da!

Dear Abby
Got a problem…

The whole family things my new meals are delicious
They ask me, “What’s your secret?” Abby, I think they’re getting suspicious
My smart-ass eight year old keeps asking, “Where’s all the meat?”
“The red dye #2 kind that’s kept in the fridge?”

If they find out the truth, I don’t think they’ll understand
Abby, what do I tell my family?

Dear Reaganomics victim
Consult your clergyman
Make sure the body’s blessed
And everything should be just fine

Just Fine…

49
jaunte  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:40:34am

Acosta is lying.

50
jaunte  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:41:40am
51
BlueSpotinAL  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:42:13am

52
A Mom Anon  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:42:56am

re: #28 marcusgorillius

Huge hugs to both of you. I hope she is feeling better soon and you are taking care of yourself too.

53
EPR-radar  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:44:47am

re: #45 I Would Prefer Not To

1) She’s not perfect
2) She is not giving a good enough reason to not move forward. She may have a plan, but how would we know?
3) Eventually she’s going to lose support from people who can’t take this much longer.
4) Investigating child rapists and human rights violations that are taking place in our country is part her fucking job.

I supported her for speaker, but my support is wearing thin, very thin.

We need to end up with aggressive House oversight of Trump and his gang of crooks, up to and including impeachment hearings. I know these things take time, but my patience is also wearing very, very thin.

54
sagehen  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:44:49am
55
MsJ  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:44:56am
56
austin_blue  Jul 10, 2019 • 11:48:33am

re: #39 Charles Johnson

[Embedded content]

Disastrous haircuts. Two bowls and a pair of scissors?

Done and dusted!


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
3 weeks ago
Views: 361 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1