Pages

Jump to bottom

6 comments

1 Political Atheist  Tue, Dec 31, 2013 9:05:33am

Really good Page. Well done.

2 Norbrook  Tue, Dec 31, 2013 9:17:21am

One of the “killing two birds with one stone” aspects of this episode is that besides giving Matt Smith a chance to have a great chance to show his chops, giving the Doctor more regenerations got around one of the difficulties with the Doctor Who canon the Day of the Doctor introduced. In other words, according to canon, Matt Smith’s Doctor was the last one. Now they have a plausible reason for the new Doctor, and also to extend the show for another 50 or so years.

3 hartly  Tue, Dec 31, 2013 11:40:05am

To be fair to the BBC, the other surviving Doctors weren’t pleased with their prospective roles in the proposed Dark Dimension movie, and I’m not sure they would have done it even if it had been okayed. Colin Baker said in an interview that Jon Pertwee was particularly upset with the minor role he was given. Colin’s own opinion was that in keeping with previous multi-Doctor stories, either the current Doctor (in this case Sylvester McCoy) should get the lion’s share of the action, or they should all be featured equally.

4 lawhawk  Tue, Dec 31, 2013 12:12:13pm

I’m kind of mixed about the episode and the way Matt Smith was sent off and Capaldi’s doctor introduced.

First off, the good:

Matt Smith put up what is the equivalent of an Emmy winning performance, capturing the angst of aging and shifting the perspective of the Time Lord who doesn’t age to one who ages immensely while those around them change not at all
This was one of the better acted episodes in recent years all the way around.
Putting the Doctor in defense of Christmas (on Trenzalore no less) was interesting, and explains why the planet is so important.
Interesting way of wrapping up the loose ends of why the crack in time exists, including that the Doctor isn’t infalliable.
The Silence must fall is given new meaning, but not sure I like the way they tried to resolve it - the Kovarians were a splinter cell

The bad:
Rewriting canon about the Time War, regenerations, and what happens to all that which has passed in time over the past several seasons. This is a problem that began with The Moment.

Bringing back Amy Pond was a bit of mirroring with the introduction of Matt Smith as the Doctor, but it didn’t quite feel right. Amy got a proper sendoff previously. There wasn’t a need to bring her back, although they both got to quip about the haircuts/wigs (breaking the 4th wall).

The deux ex machina of giving the Doctor new regeneration(s) gets around a thorny issue as to just when and how the Doctor will end. There’s a certain amount of pressure and gravitas that comes with knowing that you’re going to come to an end. To set affairs right and to do right by those around you. That was one of the motivations for The Doctor defending Trenzalore.

Now? Not so much, though there’s perhaps a need to justify the extension.

I think that the physical regeneration gave short shrift to Capaldi’s entrance. One moment, it’s Smith. The next, it’s Capaldi. It remains to be seen how he’s going to fill Smith’s shoes. Well, I hope.

5 The War TARDIS  Tue, Dec 31, 2013 12:30:37pm

re: #4 lawhawk

I’m also mixed, but lean towards good.

Apparently, bringing back Gallifrey has been Moffat’s plan for awhile. At least since Series 5, but possibly as far back as Series 2, when Davies was Showrunner.

Amy’s last scene there rally has me split. On one hand, I like bookends.

On the other hand, it took attention from the current companion, Clara.

I actually thought the Deus Ex Machina was a bit interesting, at least in terms of regards of who caused it to happen. The fact that Clara’s plea shifted the Time Lords to action is impressive, considering the propensity they had for arrogance in the Classic Series. Though, I was disappointed in how regeneration was used as a weapon special effects wise. I wish is had flensed the things that it hit, rather than causing them to go boom.

As for defending Trenzalore, I still find it poignant. One theory I have heard is that the Doctor’s Defence of the planet for centuries was that it might have been a factor in giving the Doctor 12 more regenerations.

At the current rate of use, that insures the series life for at least another 36-60 years.

6 Killgore Trout  Tue, Dec 31, 2013 4:19:41pm

Well done. Interesting thoughts about East Enders and Dr. Who. I saw the following day that Dr. Who beat East Enders in the Christmas ratings for the first time in recent years. I had no idea the East Enders Christmas special was such a big tradition.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh