re: #1025 Salamantis

You cannot find a flaw in the mathematics and I have previously posted, and reposted in this very thread, why your objections are irrelevant. It is YOU who has to demonstrate why the current climatological consensus on this issue is, according to you and almost no one else, grievously wrong.

Sal, the flaw is that it is the wrong math to use for the reasons I listed. You have claimed that you have conclusively shown something.

Don’t try to shift the topic when I actually have told you why the math is wrong. So either, back up your experiment and the flawed analysis you made or, acknowledge that was wrong and then we will move on to your other claims.