re: #126 Bagua

Well we disagree on this I suppose, but the list of serious errors now includes the Himalayan Glaciers, the Amazon, and Africa. All false data based upon non-peer reviewed science, all given with erroneous confidence levels. Numerous people, including strong advocates of Global Warming like the BBC and the Guardian are now demanding apologies and calling for Dr. Pachauri’s resignation and a shake up of the IPCC to reform it.

And the list of absolutely confirmed and exhaustively researched evidence in the IPCC’s AR4 documents amounts to more than 3,000 pages, with many thousands of citations for scientific papers and studies.

You’re promoting nonsense to suggest that the minuscule number of problems found are cause for significant doubt, in comparison to the vast amount of valid evidence.