re: #142 Cog

I don’t think Glenn Reynolds article was very biased or ludicrous at all. In fact, it was one of the more balanced and reasoned looks at the situation that came out shortly after the tradgedy. As Glenn noted today, he used “blood libel” in his article, but the headline was written for him by the paper as it often is with the MSM and columnists.

There is no equivocation. There is heated, disgusting, and violent rhetoric on both sides, but anyone trying to pin the blame for the shootings on Palin or the tea party is either intentionally dishonest or delusional.

You can’t spin it any other way. What happened was a tragedy of the human condition, not a tragedy of the left or right.

I don’t know how many times liberals have to say this, but just in case you guys don’t get it…

NO ONE IS BLAMING PALIN FOR THE SHOOTING OF GIFFORDS.

What is that, some kind of diversion for the guilty conscious of the Right?

No, it is NOT HER FAULT. Her fault is stirring up the pot, boiling up the blood, or as Leonard Pitts, Jr. said it, “It was not the seed, but it was the soil.”