re: #187 researchok

I’m not in the least bit sorry for being snarky or harsh with you. This is the bullshit you pull every time: You claim a bunch of authority, wildly fail to back it up— the intellectual dishonesty of citing a paper in support of your position that doesn’t even mention shame or guilt is just fucking astounding to me— and then claim whoever you’re arguing with just doesn’t understand.

I don’t understand why you need to flail around like this. I don’t understand what you feel it gets you to cite a really fucking random list of papers, articles, websites, etc., especially when the most cursory reading of them will show that most either don’t support your point, are completely irrelevant to it, or argue against it.

Feel free to lol some more or something.