re: #235 saik0max0r

Fine, I’ll concede this for the sake of argument, as long as you concede the fact that the conversations in the email regarding dodging deleting emails, putting pressure on editors and cherry picking are pretty shady if not criminal for what’s supposed to be a scientific body working in the public interest.

No, I don’t agree and I’m not conceding any of that. I don’t know the full context for the discussions about deleting emails, and I’m not going to jump to the conclusion that it was “shady,” sorry. As for putting pressure on editors, welcome to the real world where people put pressure on other people. And I didn’t see any evidence at all of “cherry picking.”