re: #264 Obdicut

I’m sorry, Cato, but your definition of Truism is simply wrong. It does not matter how it’s stated— the definition of a truism is something that is not profound.

If what you are saying is profound, it is by its nature not a truism. That’s what the word, you know, means.

Since when does truth require profundity? This is an assumption only a post-Heideggerian autothoughtbot could make.

Truth is true. That is, you know, the meaning of the word.