re: #420 Slumbering Behemoth

The analogy stands, as it is reasonable. And I never said that was part of your argument. I was simply adding further comment on the ongoing discussion of the brain dead term “chickenhawk”. You know this.

Dunno. It’s like you can’t express a point of criticism or contention without someone crying that you’re butt-hurt, feeling oppressed, or put-upon. What’s that about? It sounds like projection to me.

Ah. Your brush may be narrow at times, but not always.

Show me a time it wasn’t.

Go on, search for it so you can nurture that sense of wounded correctness. Reminds me of general consensus in the gay community circa 1992, except then we had actual material reasons for feeling that way.

Heh, but you’re just mocking me for that one time I called you on your obvious broad brushing. I think the only hurt feelings here are yours.

Lol, mocking you. You can’t really believe that.

It’s not up to me to grant you permission to think whatever, but you’re also within your rights to keep being wrong about whatever, and you’re wrong a the rest in your presumptions.

People can nurture their petty resentments about one poster at LGF if they want, but that’s on them. “Chickenhawk” is just a word, move past it.