re: #471 klystron

Yeah, I agree. I should have been clearer that the only thing I am not giving her shit for is attempting to have a dialog with the website owner before resorting to a full DCMA takedown request.

It sets my spidey sense to tingling. Charles gets into it on Twitter with that Perter Duke photographer guy who appears to be an UpChuck fanboy, then all of a sudden some other photographer comes out of the blue publicly alleging copyright infringement, but failing to provide any details? What a coincidence. //