Sarah Palin: Doubling Down on Bigotry

Wingnuts • Views: 2,525

Sarah Palin is doubling down on bigotry, with yet another Facebook post that brushes aside minor issues like tolerance and openness to get to what she really wants to say: Muslims shouldn’t have the same constitutional rights as other Americans. Sarah Palin: An Intolerable Mistake on Hallowed Ground | Facebook.

Earlier today, Mayor Bloomberg responded to my comments about the planned mosque at Ground Zero by suggesting that a decision not to allow the building of a mosque at that sacred place would somehow violate American principles of tolerance and openness.

Right. Well, we’re about to see how much those principles matter to Palin:

No one is disputing that America stands for – and should stand for – religious tolerance. It is a foundation of our republic. This is not an issue of religious tolerance but of common moral sense. To build a mosque at Ground Zero is a stab in the heart of the families of the innocent victims of those horrific attacks.

Wait a minute. I thought it was supposed to be the left that exalts feelings above everything else. Yet here’s Sarah Palin, heroine of the right wing, saying that people’s feelings take precedence over religious tolerance, openness, and the Constitutionally guaranteed right of freedom of religion.

And believe it or not, there are families of 9/11 victims who are not opposed to the community center two blocks from Ground Zero (it’s not “at” Ground Zero, no matter how many times Palin repeats that lie). Sarah Palin takes it on herself to speak for all of these families, but she has no moral right to do so.

When the World Trade Center was attacked and destroyed by Al Qaeda, some of the innocent victims that day were also Muslims. But in Palin’s netherworld of fear and hate, they simply don’t count.

Her first post about this, using the non-word “refudiate,” got a lot of attention because of its utter stupidity. But the much more important point about this Palin position is that she is openly coming out as an anti-Muslim bigot of the worst kind. She’s not simply opposed to radical Islamists, which any decent person would and should be. She’s opposed to Islam itself, and Muslims themselves.

Here you have the modern right wing in a nutshell. Fear and bigotry trumps everything else — the Constitution, the rule of law, religious freedom, everything.

Jump to bottom

49 comments
1 jamesfirecat  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:36:19pm

Fear and Loathing in Wassila.

2 lawhawk  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:37:20pm
To build a mosque atnear Ground Zero is a stab in the heart of the families of the innocent victims of those horrific attacks.

Palin continues to recite the bogus talking point that the mosque/community center will be at Ground Zero.

It isn’t.

It’s going to be two blocks away, but that’s still too close for comfort for the folks who oppose this project.

3 Kronocide  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:37:23pm

Charles, it’s a stab in the heart. A STAB IN THE HEART!!!

Once STAB IN THE HEART Level is achieved the rules change.

4 Lidane  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:37:25pm
Fear and bigotry trumps everything else — the Constitution, the rule of law, religious freedom, everything.

This has been true for decades. It’s just more obvious now because the GOP has gone full retard since Obama was elected.

5 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:37:36pm
No one is disputing that America stands for – and should stand for – religious tolerance.

She then proceeded to dispute that America should stand for religious tolerance.

What a poltroon.

6 Feline Fearless Leader  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:38:37pm

re: #2 lawhawk

Palin continues to recite the bogus talking point that the mosque/community center will be at Ground Zero.

It isn’t.

It’s going to be two blocks away, but that’s still too close for comfort for the folks who oppose this project.

I’m getting the impression that building this project in North American is too close for a good portion of the folk opposing the project.

/

7 Kragar (Antichrist )  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:39:08pm

Muslims opening a mosque/community center = Bad

Dominionists rewriting history and forcing their agenda where its not wanted = Good

8 Varek Raith  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:39:46pm

Ah, she shows her true colors…

9 freetoken  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:39:57pm

re: #7 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Yeah, one doesn’t know which is greater: the hypocrisy or the stupidity.

10 garhighway  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:40:33pm

re: #9 freetoken

Yeah, one doesn’t know which is greater: the hypocrisy or the stupidity.

I’ll take the stupidity and give you the points.

11 Corvid  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:40:40pm

re: #5 Obdicut

No one is disputing that America stands for – and should stand for – religious tolerance.

She then proceeded to dispute that America should stand for religious tolerance.

What a poltroon.

A poltroon she is not to mention a sophomoric buffoon. It scares the pants off me that she is such an incredibly successful media figure. I fear that millions and millions of voters are as foolish as she is.

12 Kragar (Antichrist )  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:40:52pm

re: #9 freetoken

Yeah, one doesn’t know which is greater: the hypocrisy or the stupidity.

Can’t it be both?

13 webevintage  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:42:03pm

sigh….

14 Sol Berdinowitz  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:44:09pm

There is religion that one simply uses to identify oneself with a culture

There is religion that one practices in worship and rituals

There is religion that people seek to impose through laws

There is religion that people seek to impose through violence.

Most folks in America, regardless of denomination, belong to the first two groups.

The Dominionists and Muslim Fundamentalists belong to the third, Radial Islamists and Hutarees to the fourth.


These lines are fluid, people are moved from one to another through various arguments and events.

But there are distinctions, I don’t think Sarah sees them.

15 avanti  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:44:14pm

Villack called Shirley, apologized and offered he a position in the department. She said she’d think about it for a few days.

16 freetoken  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:44:35pm

Charles hit on one of the greatly ironic things about Palin in all of this: her use of feelings.

I’m reading a couple of books about Godel right now (and thinking of writing a long Pages entry on how they apply to what’s going on today and to LGF), and one of the authors makes a really good point about intuition - on how bad it can be. One of the caveats is that when speaking of intuition in an intellectual (or mathematical) sense one is not speaking of feelings.

Palin is playing the feeling of offense to identify with the emotions of those of whom she will try to get to vote for herself in a coming election. In this she is right up there with the best of demagogues.

17 Lidane  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:45:31pm

re: #6 oaktree

I’m getting the impression that building this project on Earth is too close for a good portion of the folk opposing the project.

/

FTFY

It doesn’t matter where the community center is built. These loons will never, ever be satisfied.

Also, as Charles correctly points out, some of the people who died in the attacks were Muslim, but that truth doesn’t matter to the bigots. They only want to eradicate any and all Muslim presence in this country, despite the clear and obvious differences between the more mainstream American Muslim community and the fanatical whackjobs who flew planes into buildings.

18 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:46:06pm

re: #15 avanti

Villack called Shirley, apologized and offered he a position in the department. She said she’d think about it for a few days.

She could become Director of Not Flying Off the Handle, in charge of Thinking Before Acting.

19 Sol Berdinowitz  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:46:13pm

She is telling people that they are alright to be outraged, and soon they will be expressing that outrage in physical form, and Second Amendment rights will probably come into play here at some point, too.

20 Jimmah  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:46:23pm

It’s been a great week for conservatives to show us their moral calibre hasn’t it?

More on the nauseasting behaviour of conservative media with regard to ‘Sherrodgate’

Shirley Sherrod and the shame of conservative media

You want to see media bias in action? Okay — look at the conservative media reaction to the firing of Shirley Sherrod.

Sherrod is the former U.S. Department of Agriculture employee fired for supposed anti-white racism. On July 19, Andrew Breitbart’s BigGovernment.com website posted a short video clip from a speech Sherrod had delivered to an NAACP gathering in March.

In the clip, Sherrod confessed to having deliberately declined on racial grounds to help a white farmer faced with a foreclosure on his farm. She was immediately terminated by the USDA and condemned by the national NAACP.

But a second look at the tape made it obvious that the tape had been severely edited, abruptly cut short. Within hours it emerged that the story on the tape was exactly the opposite of the story Breitbart had wanted to tell.

[Link: theweek.com…]

21 Kronocide  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:46:44pm

re: #16 freetoken

Charles hit on one of the greatly ironic things about Palin in all of this: her use of feelings.

Palin is playing the feeling of offense to identify with the emotions of those of whom she will try to get to vote for herself in a coming election. In this she is right up there with the best of demagogues.

The right has hammered the left for years on this, and to a degree I agree with it. Palin is hypocritical, plain as day.

22 freetoken  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:51:03pm

re: #20 Jimmah

It’s been a great week for conservatives to show us their moral calibre hasn’t it?

The Sherrod story has been dominant in the news cycle, but there are other cases around. You should see the dancing on the grave of Stephen Schneider going on in certain circles.

23 darthstar  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:51:44pm

re: #14 ralphieboy

There is religion that one simply uses to identify oneself with a culture

There is religion that one practices in worship and rituals

There is religion that people seek to impose through laws

There is religion that people seek to impose through violence.

Most folks in America, regardless of denomination, belong to the first two groups.

The Dominionists and Muslim Fundamentalists belong to the third, Radial Islamists and Hutarees to the fourth.

These lines are fluid, people are moved from one to another through various arguments and events.

But there are distinctions, I don’t think Sarah sees them.

This is religion.

24 tnguitarist  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:52:25pm
Additionally, what Beck really fails to grasp is that “Muslim families” did not attack the United States. The U.S. was attacked by a dangerous cult of psychopathic terrorists known as al Qaeda.

Jason Linkins has a good take on the subject.

HuffPo

25 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:55:58pm

re: #15 avanti

Villack called Shirley, apologized and offered he a position in the department. She said she’d think about it for a few days.

Good for her.

26 Cato the Elder  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:56:29pm

Someone - I believe it was Jimmah - posted a list of innocent Muslim victims who died on that same “hallowed ground”.

What better way to honor them than to allow a peaceful mosque to be built?

On the other hand, I do question the wisdom of choosing September 11 as ground-breaking day for this project. If that is indeed the plan, it seems to me unnecessarily provocative.

27 garhighway  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 1:57:36pm

re: #24 tnguitarist

Jason Linkins has a good take on the subject.

HuffPo

I have a different thought on this topic. People seem to forget that the 9/11 hijackers had certain key characteristics in common. In particular, they were all hotel guests immediately prior to the day.

So isn’t it hurtful to the feelings of the relatives of 9/11 victims (and those of us who lived through it live and in person) to build hotels near Ground Zero? Shouldn’t we have prevented the reopening of the Millennium Hilton? And the Four Seasons at Battery Park? After all, a hotel’s a hotel. How can we distinguish between those that harbor terrorists and those that don’t?

Just a thought.

28 Lidane  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 2:02:05pm

re: #26 Cato the Elder

On the other hand, I do question the wisdom of choosing September 11 as ground-breaking day for this project. If that is indeed the plan, it seems to me unnecessarily provocative.

It depends on how they do it. I think if the groundbreaking is done in a respectful way, honoring all the victims, and also making mention of the Muslims who died in the attacks that day, it won’t be a provocation, but rather an invitation to healing.

Of course, that won’t matter for Caribou Barbie and the rest of the Outrageous Outrage Brigade on the right. They’ll find something to bitch about no matter how respectful and classy any groundbreaking ceremony might be.

29 Kefirah  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 2:07:44pm

re: #7 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

muslims opening a community center two blocks from ground zero = apocalypse

fundamentalist christians opening wee churches in my texas public schools = paradise

30 Spare O'Lake  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 2:13:31pm

The last sentence:

Many Americans, myself included, feel it would be an intolerable and tragic mistake to allow such a project sponsored by such an individual to go forward on such hallowed ground. This is nothing close to “religious intolerance,” it’s just common decency.
- Sarah Palin

In the end, wriggling like a stuck worm, Palin opines that the building of the mosque would not be constitutionally protected.
EPIC FAIL, Sarah.

31 bubba zanetti  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 2:19:22pm

Let’s just make downtown NYC a turban-free zone so no heartlands will be enstabbed.

Sikhs may pick up special “I’m not Muslim” armbands at particpating Starbucks and most newsstands.

32 sagehen  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 2:31:56pm

Didn’t conservatives used to hold it as a dear principle that local authority is always superior?

It’s up to the Lower Manhattan Community Board, and the people of NYC, to make this decision. There’s no reason we should give a damn if Alaskans feel metaphorically stabbed at the thought of how we choose to govern our city. Ours. The one that we live in, and she doesn’t.

33 JRCMYP  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 2:51:23pm

What, exactly, is “common moral sense”? I’ve heard Republicans beat the “common sense” drum until it broke, but common *moral* sense? It’s as if she’s cutting and pasting a tired meme and then shoehorning in “morals”—trying to make bigotry and racism moral? Seriously? And aren’t the people she’s “pleading” with Americans?

I’ve said this before: I’m neither Republican or Democratic. I’m a socially-left leaning independent voter. But I’m so freaking sick of political theatre. Does Sarah Palin really *care* about other people’s feelings? Does she *care* that she might be hurting the feelings of the families of the “peaceful Muslims” killed during 9/11? Does she consider that NYers are *proud* of their tolerance and diversity?

Of course not. She wants eye-balls, hits and cheap PR.

34 JRCMYP  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 2:53:43pm

The only good thing about Palin? Ann Coulter seems to have faded away.

35 Mardukhai  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 3:40:33pm

ASMA and the good Imam, and his wife Daisy, are not what they make themselves out to be.

If they are so moderate, why the shilling for the genocidal regime of Sudan? And where did the money for the mosque/community center come from?

I have been on their email list for years. I have asked pointed questions about Sudan, and the money, and have received no response whatsoever.

36 KarenJ503  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 3:49:58pm

Thank you for being one of the few conservative bloggers to push back on the many Republican “base” red meat offerings Sarah Palin seems to churn out like offal.

37 garhighway  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 3:51:07pm

re: #35 Mardukhai

ASMA and the good Imam, and his wife Daisy, are not what they make themselves out to be.

If they are so moderate, why the shilling for the genocidal regime of Sudan? And where did the money for the mosque/community center come from?

I have been on their email list for years. I have asked pointed questions about Sudan, and the money, and have received no response whatsoever.

And the connection between Sudan and lower Manhattan is what, exactly?

Is it your position that in order to open a church or community center, the cleric in charge has to have been on the “right” side of every issue from the beginning of time to the present day? And to what other churches have you applied THAT test?

38 Filala  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 4:33:27pm

Do you all really believe that the proposed Muslim Center near Ground Zero is going to serve as a place of outreach and friendship to non-Muslims? If so, I’ve got some swampland in Florida that you might d be interested in buying. Ever hear of taqqia? It’s a principle in Islam that says it is OK to lie to non Muslims when it serves the purpose of advancing Islam.
I have read many articles about Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf, the organizer of proposed building. His intentions are not as presented to trusting New Yorkers.
The following was taken this site: [Link: www.cordobainitiative.org…]

“Cordoba House is a Muslim-led project which will build a world-class facility that promotes tolerance, reflecting the rich diversity of New York City. The center will be community-driven, serving as a platform for inter-community gatherings and cooperation at all levels, providing a space for all New Yorkers to enjoy.

This proposed project is about promoting integration, tolerance of difference and community cohesion through arts and culture. Cordoba House will provide a place where individuals, regardless of their backgrounds, will find a center of learning, art and cult[Link: www.hudson-ny.org…] and most importantly, a center guided by Islamic values in their truest form - compassion, generosity, and respect for all.”


I don’t buy one word of this deceptive propaganda. The man who is in charge of the Mosque, Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf is like a wolf in sheep’s
clothing. He refuses to condemn Hamas as a terrorist organization, he believes that western governments are evil because they do not follow Sharia law and his aim in the long run is to bring Sharia to the United States. If you are pro the New York mosque I suggest you read the following article by Salah Choudhury:

[Link: www.hudson-ny.org…]

39 Filala  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 4:44:31pm

Here’s the correct link to the article by Salah Choudhury:

[Link: www.hudson-ny.org…]

40 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 4:53:42pm

Ugh.

41 wrenchwench  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 5:18:15pm

re: #38 Filala

Ever hear of taqqia?

You have some reading to do.

42 edmigper  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 5:47:53pm

Despite what Palin thinks, there is no such thing as common moral sense and there never will be. Even if there was, the problem with common sense of all types is that most commonly held beliefs are untrue.

43 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 7:37:22pm

Listen to me: there is not going to be sharia law in America. It’s not going to happen. Ever.

The people who are telling you you’re in danger of being ruled by sharia law are lying to you.

We have our own laws and the vast majority of Americans are just fine with them, and the idea that somehow this booga-booga sharia thing is going to sneak in through the back door and take over while we’re asleep is … a paranoid fantasy.

I know, this is hard to accept, when you’ve been fed propaganda. But that’s what it is. You need to get a grip on reality. America is not being “Islamicized.” The concept is ludicrous and its backers are bad people.

44 Hanoch  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 7:59:29pm

It seems to me both sides are wrong here. Those who would prevent the Mosque are wrong because that does not accord with religious freedom. But those who would build the Mosque are also wrong because they are being insensitive to many Americans who feel that a Mosque at this location is inappropriate given what took place there.

This reminds me in some respects of the incident of the nuns near Auschwitz many years ago. The Church eventually agreed — properly in my view — that this was not the ideal spot for the nuns and that they should move out of respect for the views of those who felt it to be offensive.

One can go through life proclaiming “my rights”—the world be damned. But that is not necessarily the decent thing to do.

45 Filala  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 9:20:21pm

re: #43 Charles

It’s not a paranoid fantasy if there actually are people who openly declare their intention to make the entire world subject to Islam. They have time and determination on their side. They are fanatics and need to be taken seriously. My information comes from many sources, just as yours does, so I suggest that you look at some of the places that I trust more than the main stream media. How can you be so certain that radical Islam won’t prevail if we do not take steps to prevent it from spreading into the US as it has in Europe?
According to this source, Sharia is already making headway in the United States:

46 Raccoon City  Wed, Jul 21, 2010 10:49:10pm

Whatever happened to the “controversy” over the 9/11 memorial in Pennsylvania where one of the planes went down. You know, the evil memorial shaped like an Islamic crescent and maybe it pointed at the secret room below Mecca where Osama Bin Laden is hiding the suitcase nukes made in Iran for him. I’m surprised we haven’t heard more about that with the NYC mosque in the news and all.

47 Food Lion  Thu, Jul 22, 2010 2:00:44am

re: #45 Filala

Muslims make up what, 2% of the American population? Are you really worried about Sharia law? Come on, relax a little.

48 Sol Berdinowitz  Thu, Jul 22, 2010 3:27:37am

I do think the community center there is a bad idea, and it is going to offend a lot of people. But I also believe that these people have a right to put one up there.

49 Filala  Thu, Jul 22, 2010 2:27:50pm

re: #48 ralphieboy

“But I also believe that these people have a right to put one up there.”

And I think that the one’s who insist upon building a Mosque, community center or whatever they want to call it( now its going to be named the Park51 building) may have that right, according to our laws, but they are using our laws against us to advance their stealth agenda. Americans are so tolerant that we view building the Mosque near Ground Zero as simply part of our tradition of religious freedom. To the Muslim world it will stand as a symbol of the superiority of Islam and proof that America is indeed a country rotting from within and ripe for the introduction of more and more Islamic influence until we submit completely, no matter how long that takes.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh