1 Ojoe  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:32:58pm

Who?

2 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:33:17pm

re: #1 Ojoe

Don’t be fatuous.

3 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:34:52pm

Rachael & I see this really differently. As in Fox’s bad habits are irrelevant to MSNBC policy. No need to take away legitimate rights (donating to the candidate you like) to ensure the appearance of impartiality. Especially from a talent (ahem) like Keith Olberman who vocalizes his preferences with nearly every syllable! It’s utterly senseless to me and intrusive as all get out.

Is there no union to protect the Democratic rights of on air talent?

4 Dark_Falcon  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:36:42pm

re: #3 Rightwingconspirator

Rachael & I see this really differently. As in Fox’s bad habits are irrelevant to MSNBC policy. No need to take away legitimate rights (donating to the candidate you like) to ensure the appearance of impartiality. Especially from a talent (ahem) like Keith Olberman who vocalizes his preferences with nearly every syllable! It’s utterly senseless to me and intrusive as all get out.

Is there no union to protect the Democratic rights of on air talent?

It is, however, a long-standing policy of NBC News. Olbermann agreed to abide by the policy when he was hired. He broke the rules and will now be punished.

5 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:38:31pm

whatever… more people (and better people I bet) are reading this than watching MSNBC.

(no I don’t have a link it’s just my opinion)

6 Aceofwhat?  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:38:41pm

re: #3 Rightwingconspirator

Rachael & I see this really differently. As in Fox’s bad habits are irrelevant to MSNBC policy. No need to take away legitimate rights (donating to the candidate you like) to ensure the appearance of impartiality. Especially from a talent (ahem) like Keith Olberman who vocalizes his preferences with nearly every syllable! It’s utterly senseless to me and intrusive as all get out.

Is there no union to protect the Democratic rights of on air talent?

dude signed a contract. he doesn’t like the policy, he can leave.

= democratic right.

7 reine.de.tout  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:38:55pm

re: #3 Rightwingconspirator

Rachael & I see this really differently. As in Fox’s bad habits are irrelevant to MSNBC policy. No need to take away legitimate rights (donating to the candidate you like) to ensure the appearance of impartiality. Especially from a talent (ahem) like Keith Olberman who vocalizes his preferences with nearly every syllable! It’s utterly senseless to me and intrusive as all get out.

Is there no union to protect the Democratic rights of on air talent?

RWC -
Many government employers have requirements in place that employees refrain from public political participation, including making donations; in that case, it’s done as a way to protect employees from politicians who might want to remove them from their jobs for not supporting the “right” candidates (See: Huey Long and his deduct box).

Anyhow - their policy didn’t prohibit the contributions from being made, but said the person “should” report it prior to making it. A bit squishy if you ask me, as to wording (should vs. must - two very different things).

I really can’t help but wonder if there’s something else going on we don’t know about. Just me.

8 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:40:45pm

re: #7 reine.de.tout

RWC -
Many government employers have requirements in place that employees refrain from public political participation, including making donations; in that case, it’s done as a way to protect employees from politicians who might want to remove them from their jobs for not supporting the “right” candidates (See: Huey Long and his deduct box).

Anyhow - their policy didn’t prohibit the contributions from being made, but said the person “should” report it prior to making it. A bit squishy if you ask me, as to wording (should vs. must - two very different things).

I really can’t help but wonder if there’s something else going on we don’t know about. Just me.

ratings perhaps?

9 elbruce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:41:13pm

To me, this is just another example of the rule: “all liberals have to fight with one hand tied behind their back.”

But Rachel’s central point is good: MSNBC is not the “liberal FOX.” No other news channel operates like FOX. That’s because FOX isn’t a news channel. It just plays one on TV.

10 Aceofwhat?  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:41:17pm

good night all

11 Charles Johnson  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:41:32pm

Uh - just a minute. She said she understands why MSNBC has the rule in their contracts, and that other people had followed the rule, and she never said Olbermann didn’t deserve to be suspended.

She’s making a much larger point with her comparisons to Fox News — and that’s how utterly out of control Fox’s GOP cheerleading has become.

12 reine.de.tout  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:41:41pm

Oh, hell.
Jill Clayburgh died
I didn’t know she was ill.

re: #8 brookly red

ratings perhaps?

Who knows?

13 jaunte  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:41:42pm

As Maddow says, the bigger story than the Olbermann contributions and suspension is the vast difference between the operation of a cable news business and a cable news business designed specifically to publicize and elect candidates from the Republican party.

14 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:43:01pm

re: #12 reine.de.tout

Oh, hell.
Jill Clayburgh died
I didn’t know she was ill.

Who knows?

just one more reason I don’t do TV…

15 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:43:17pm

re: #11 Charles

Uh - just a minute. She said she understands why MSNBC has the rule in their contracts, and that other people had followed the rule, and never said Olbermann didn’t deserve to be suspended.

She’s making a much larger point with her comparisons to Fox News — and that’s how utterly out of control Fox’s GOP cheerleading has become.

That I can agree with.

16 webevintage  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:43:39pm

re: #8 brookly red

ratings perhaps?

But doesn’t Olberman have the highest rated show on MSNBC (and yes I know that does not mean huge ratings) or is it Maddow now?

17 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:44:29pm

re: #11 Charles

Uh - just a minute. She said she understands why MSNBC has the rule in tier contracts, and that other people had followed the rule, and never said Olbermann didn’t deserve to be suspended.

She’s making a much larger point with her comparisons to Fox News — and that’s how utterly out of control Fox’s GOP cheerleading has become.

I made the tu quoque as well here but I don’t think it is helping MSNBC or Olberman or even the integrity of journalism in general. Fox News just not produce journalism and does not want to. They simply want to run the Republican Party. And that’s been clear for a long time now. It’s not a very new point.

18 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:45:19pm

re: #12 reine.de.tout

Oh, hell.
Jill Clayburgh died
I didn’t know she was ill.

Who knows?

Sad.

19 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:45:21pm

re: #16 webevintage

But doesn’t Olberman have the highest rated show on MSNBC (and yes I know that does not mean huge ratings) or is it Maddow now?

I am defiantly the wrong person to ask…

20 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:45:31pm

re: #7 reine.de.tout

IMO. This amounts to a great case for allowing anonymous donations by individuals. That way its not “public” participation. I just have this feeling of wrongness about talking away that right. Maybe I’m wrong.

We should not have to give up that right to work somewhere.

21 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:47:14pm

re: #6 Aceofwhat?

Business contracts should leave participation in the process unhindered.

22 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:47:45pm

Oh, wait, I forgot to update you all on the breath-taking race for at-large soil & water district person in Washington County, Oregon.

It turns out you had to a. be registered 14 days in advance c. own land in the county AND receive at least one vote.

Nobody did.

So they’ll fill the position with an appointment.

Democracy has been thwarted! To arms!

23 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:49:03pm

re: #21 Rightwingconspirator

Business contracts should leave participation in the process unhindered.

perhaps, but they didn’t & he signed it… I am sure there will be a law suit

24 b_sharp  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:49:05pm

re: #22 EmmmieG

Oh, wait, I forgot to update you all on the breath-taking race for at-large soil & water district person in Washington County, Oregon.

It turns out you had to a. be registered 14 days in advance c. own land in the county AND receive at least one vote.

Nobody did.

So they’ll fill the position with an appointment.

Democracy has been thwarted! To arms!

Wow, cool.

I have to go clip my toenails.

25 Blue Point  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:49:48pm

Curious way for MSNBC to “take the high ground”. Fox News is a shill for the GOP/Tea Party and anything but a news service. They back the Republican/Tea party with everything including money. Is this a way to call attention to that? Or is it just infighting at MSNBC?

26 Jadespring  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:49:58pm

re: #22 EmmmieG

Oh, wait, I forgot to update you all on the breath-taking race for at-large soil & water district person in Washington County, Oregon.

It turns out you had to a. be registered 14 days in advance c. own land in the county AND receive at least one vote.

Nobody did.

So they’ll fill the position with an appointment.

Democracy has been thwarted! To arms!

Thanks. Wondering about this was keeping me up at night. :D

27 jaunte  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:50:25pm

John Boehner tweets:

There are several steps I believe the next speaker should be prepared to take immediately. Among them: no earmarks.


We’ll wait and see.

28 elbruce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:50:51pm

re: #13 jaunte

As Maddow says, the bigger story than the Olbermann contributions and suspension is the vast difference between the operation of a cable news business and a cable news business designed specifically to publicize and elect candidates from the Republican party.

Calling FOX a “cable news business” is just buying into their hype. They’re no more a news network than pro wrestling is a real sport.

What “FOX News” does is the opposite of news. They do not inform; instead, they confuse. They do not report; instead, they lend legitimacy to certain cherry-picked rumors (e.g. Obamas $200M/day trip to India). They have no journalistic standards whatsoever. No fact-checking, no ombudsman, no written editorial policy. They are not journalists, and are therefore not a news organization.

They are a political propaganda arm, nothing more, nothing less.

As much as I’m annoyed at the Olbermann/Griffin tiff escalating into real consequences for viewers, Rachel (as always the voice of reason) has reminded me that this is proof that MSNBC does have real immobile standards, whether FOX does or not. If anything, this situation just highlights how awful FOX is at pretending to be a “news” network.

I think that most folks on both sides of the divide can admit that Olbermann has often gone too far in thinking that he’s the anti-FOX and let his ego get in the way of journalism. Hopefully this episode will serve as a reminder that FOX is the only purported “news” organization that isn’t actually working as a news organization. And in fact, which is the exact opposite of everything that “news” and “journalism” stand for.

You can’t win playing by their rules.

29 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:51:11pm

re: #24 b_sharp

Wow, cool.

I have to go clip my toenails.

Did James Otis go and clip his toenails when the Writs of Assistance were being issued?

Did John Adams clip his toenails during the trial of the Boston Massacre?

Did George Washington clip his toenails at Valley Forge. (Um, actually, it was all winter, so he probably did, but that’s not the point.)

Are you with me, patriots?

30 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:52:13pm

re: #20 Rightwingconspirator

IMO. This amounts to a great case for allowing anonymous donations by individuals. That way its not “public” participation. I just have this feeling of wrongness about talking away that right. Maybe I’m wrong.

We should not have to give up that right to work somewhere.

I have no issue whatsoever with anyone making a political contribution made by anyone.

That said, journalists are in a position of influence. Therefore, I believe their ought to be public disclosure. The fact that NBC required their management to be aware of contributions made by their employees is of marginal importance. If the public is not aware of the possible conflict on interest, NBC’s rule is window dressing.

CNN, FOX, MSNBC, et al, ought to make available all contributions made by their on air, news writing and editorial personalties.

It’s not rocket science.

31 Dark_Falcon  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:52:27pm

Tonight’s Roast Troll is now being served, Come and Get It!

32 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:52:46pm

re: #29 EmmmieG

Did James Otis go and clip his toenails when the Writs of Assistance were being issued?

Did John Adams clip his toenails during the trial of the Boston Massacre?

Did George Washington clip his toenails at Valley Forge. (Um, actually, it was all winter, so he probably did, but that’s not the point.)

Are you with me, patriots?

I would clip mine but the people at the airport took away my clipper…

33 Jadespring  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:52:58pm

re: #27 jaunte

John Boehner tweets:


We’ll wait and see.

Doesn’t most everyone say “NO EARMARKS!” at one time or another.
This particular phrase seems to on the list of programed ones that you hear when you pull that string with the plastic loop that’s stuck in their backs.

34 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:53:04pm

re: #31 Dark_Falcon

Tonight’s Roast Troll is now being served, Come and Get It!

you are what you eat

35 OIFVet  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:54:06pm

re: #20 Rightwingconspirator

IMO. This amounts to a great case for allowing anonymous donations by individuals. That way its not “public” …

Lucky for you the Supreme Court has almost granted corporations “individual” status! That way we can have companies blindly dumping money in, without knowing who.

*sigh* Maybe someday we can get a handle on political ads and campaigns.

36 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:54:08pm

re: #31 Dark_Falcon

I brought Grappa!

37 b_sharp  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:54:19pm

re: #30 researchok

I have no issue whatsoever with anyone making a political contribution made by anyone.

That said, journalists are in a position of influence. Therefore, I believe their ought to be public disclosure. The fact that NBC required their management to be aware of contributions made by their employees is of marginal importance. If the public is not aware of the possible conflict on interest, NBC’s rule is window dressing.

CNN, FOX, MSNBC, et al, ought to make available all contributions made by their on air, news writing and editorial personalties.

It’s not rocket science.

It’s not rocket surgery either.

38 jaunte  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:54:20pm

re: #28 elbruce

What “FOX News” does is the opposite of news. They do not inform; instead, they confuse. They do not report; instead, they lend legitimacy to certain cherry-picked rumors (e.g. Obamas $200M/day trip to India). They have no journalistic standards whatsoever. No fact-checking, no ombudsman, no written editorial policy. They are not journalists, and are therefore not a news organization.


This explanation has to be made repeatedly, mostly to the people who are least likely to want to listen.

39 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:54:37pm

re: #33 Jadespring

Doesn’t most everyone say “NO EARMARKS!” at one time or another.
This particular phrase seems to on the list of programed ones that you hear when you pull that string with the plastic loop that’s stuck in their backs.

ehh I am still waiting for them to drain the swamp…

40 jaunte  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:55:11pm

re: #37 b_sharp

Horticulture?

41 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:56:16pm

re: #35 OIFVet

That would be unlucky for me, as I disagree with that ruling. Severly. Corporations are made of and hire people they are not in and of themselves people, and therefore undeserving of the rights. People have right well above artificial entities like GM.

42 elbruce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:57:11pm

re: #22 EmmmieG

Oh, wait, I forgot to update you all on the breath-taking race for at-large soil & water district person in Washington County, Oregon.

It turns out you had to a. be registered 14 days in advance c. own land in the county AND receive at least one vote.

Nobody did.

So they’ll fill the position with an appointment.

Democracy has been thwarted! To arms!

The huge swath of soil & water conservation commissioner positions in Oregon is one of the weirdest electoral quirks I’ve seen anywhere. On some ballots, they take up almost all of the space, even though - really, who gives a crap about this? Shouldn’t it be an appointed position?

I actually know a guy who won one of those elections, but couldn’t take the job because he wasn’t a landowner.

43 Jadespring  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:58:02pm

re: #37 b_sharp

It’s not rocket surgery either.

or climate science…


I think the metaphor “It’s not rocket science’ needs to be updated for the 21st century. :)

44 Varek Raith  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:58:29pm

re: #43 Jadespring

or climate science…

I think the metaphor “It’s not rocket science’ needs to be updated for the 21st century. :)

It’s not quantum mechanics.

45 Jadespring  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:58:59pm

re: #44 Varek Raith

It’s not quantum mechanics.

It’s not string theory.

46 reine.de.tout  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:59:02pm

re: #29 EmmmieG

Did James Otis go and clip his toenails when the Writs of Assistance were being issued?

Did John Adams clip his toenails during the trial of the Boston Massacre?

Did George Washington clip his toenails at Valley Forge. (Um, actually, it was all winter, so he probably did, but that’s not the point.)

Are you with me, patriots?

I’m with ya!
BUT - I’m probably the only person here right now, besides you, that even knows that such things as “soil and water districts” exist - (soil & water conservation districts they’re called, here).

47 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:59:04pm

re: #35 OIFVet

re: #41 Rightwingconspirator

well yes that is true… but the same can be said about unions. I don’t have a problem with any group donating as long as it is disclosed.

48 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:59:19pm

re: #43 Jadespring

or climate science…

I think the metaphor “It’s not rocket science’ needs to be updated for the 21st century. :)

It’s not “creation science”?

49 Stanley Sea  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:59:35pm

re: #36 Rightwingconspirator

I brought Grappa!

Grappa? It’s been YEARS! Oh the memories though!

50 Jadespring  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:59:50pm

re: #48 Slumbering Behemoth

It’s not “creation science”?

:D

51 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:00:13pm

re: #42 elbruce

The huge swath of soil & water conservation commissioner positions in Oregon is one of the weirdest electoral quirks I’ve seen anywhere. On some ballots, they take up almost all of the space, even though - really, who gives a crap about this? Shouldn’t it be an appointed position?

I actually know a guy who won one of those elections, but couldn’t take the job because he wasn’t a landowner.

They’ve been trying to write in a guy at my husband’s office for years. This is how I know about the new rules.

I’m not sure why it is an elected position, although probably, you should have an elected supervisor with appointed scientific-type people.

Or my great-grandfather.

The famous story about my great-grandfather (spent his whole life as a farmer), was that when he was really old they would take two clumps of soil from the farm.

They would give one to him, and he would tell them what to amend the soil with. They would take the other to Wazzu’s labs. The report would come back the same.

Find someone like Grandad.

52 elbruce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:00:34pm

re: #30 researchok

I have no issue whatsoever with anyone making a political contribution made by anyone.

That said, journalists are in a position of influence. Therefore, I believe their ought to be public disclosure.

I would agree with the requirement (mentioned by Rachel) that a journalist should mention that they donated to someone if they interview or talk about them, on-air. It would be the equivalent of disclosure standards in print journalism.

FOX “News” states that they have such a standard, but apparently do nothing whatsoever to enforce it.

53 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:00:41pm

re: #46 reine.de.tout

I’m with ya!
BUT - I’m probably the only person here right now, besides you, that even knows that such things as “soil and water districts” exist - (soil & water conservation districts they’re called, here).

That’s what they call them here, too, but the revolutionary fervor got away with me.

54 jaunte  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:00:47pm

re: #48 Slumbering Behemoth

“It’s irreducibly complex, but I think you’ll be amused at its presumption.”

55 b_sharp  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:00:47pm

re: #45 Jadespring

It’s not string theory.

Nor is it G-String mechanics.

56 Stanley Sea  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:01:07pm

Hey Dark! Do you follow the Bulls?

Noah! Yeah! I think he has the NBA record (recent at least) for consecutive double doubles! Go Gators!

57 Jadespring  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:01:35pm

re: #47 brookly red

re: #41 Rightwingconspirator

well yes that is true… but the same can be said about unions. I don’t have a problem with any group donating as long as it is disclosed.

Well I think I should head off soon to sleep soon.

I first read this as ” well yes that is true… but the same can be said about unicorns….

…and found myself utterly confused for a few moments.

58 Varek Raith  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:02:25pm

re: #57 Jadespring

Well I think I should head off soon to sleep soon.

I first read this as ” well yes that is true… but the same can be said about unicorns…

…and found myself utterly confused for a few moments.

With sprinkles!
Image: canned_unicorn_meat_zoom.jpg

59 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:02:58pm

re: #57 Jadespring

Well I think I should head off soon to sleep soon.

I first read this as ” well yes that is true… but the same can be said about unicorns…

…and found myself utterly confused for a few moments.

I need new glasses too…

60 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:03:56pm

re: #55 b_sharp

G chord G string, gee what’s the diff?

61 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:04:11pm

re: #58 Varek Raith

Well, that explains both those fey Twilight vampires and the conspicuous absence of unicorns. The bastards!

62 elbruce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:04:47pm

re: #58 Varek Raith

With sprinkles!
Image: canned_unicorn_meat_zoom.jpg

Rachel Maddow actually used that yesterday, regarding Republican claims of “I read it somewhere on the Internet.”

63 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:04:49pm

re: #58 Varek Raith

With sprinkles!
Image: canned_unicorn_meat_zoom.jpg

Unicorn meat looks like dog food? Who knew?

64 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:05:02pm

re: #60 Rightwingconspirator

G chord G string, gee what’s the diff?

200 bucks…

65 freetoken  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:05:12pm

re: #45 Jadespring

It’s not string theory.

I haz ur string theoree right here.

66 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:05:39pm

re: #63 EmmmieG

Unicorn meat looks like dog food? Who knew?

not a speck of cereal…

67 Varek Raith  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:06:24pm

re: #65 freetoken

I haz ur string theoree right here.

Image: stringtherry.jpg

68 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:06:42pm

re: #60 Rightwingconspirator

G chord G string, gee what’s the diff?

Sorry about that folks, RWC has been given the rest of the tequila and has had the computer declared off limits for the rest of the evening! ;-)

69 celticdragon  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:07:34pm

re: #34 brookly red

you are what you eat


ewww!

70 b_sharp  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:07:50pm

re: #68 Dragon_Lady

Sorry about that folks, RWC has been given the rest of the tequila and has had the computer declared off limits for the rest of the evening! ;-)

Good move DL.

Don’t sack him though.

71 First As Tragedy, Then As Farce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:08:09pm

re: #60 Rightwingconspirator

G chord G string, gee what’s the diff?

the chord needs a major third and a perfect fifth. The G string is just G.

72 First As Tragedy, Then As Farce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:09:00pm

re: #68 Dragon_Lady

Sorry about that folks, RWC has been given the rest of the tequila and has had the computer declared off limits for the rest of the evening! ;-)

Booooo :(

(chanting) OZZY! OZZY! OZZY! OZZY!

73 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:09:08pm

re: #68 Dragon_Lady

Sorry about that folks, RWC has been given the rest of the tequila and has had the computer declared off limits for the rest of the evening! ;-)

censorship!

74 elbruce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:10:04pm

Here’s Rachel Maddow on unicorn meat:

75 deranged cat  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:10:17pm

re: #1 Ojoe

Who?

Anne. Here, you took this picture of us in front of that bagel place before it got burned down.

….her?

76 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:11:07pm

re: #67 Varek Raith

Different kinds of labs.

77 Killgore Trout  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:11:32pm

I had an unusually high number of compliments on the odor of my pork chops tonight while grilling on the big green egg. Garlic, lemon juice, marjoram and Old Bay. 4 compliments from strangers and one even came up on the porch asking for the recipe.

78 First As Tragedy, Then As Farce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:11:48pm

re: #75 deranged cat

In that post is the germinating seed of a 1970s Woody Allen movie that somehow didn’t get made.

79 Jadespring  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:11:57pm

Night folks.

If I stay up any longer I might end up seeing an actual unicorn in my living room. My brain is shutting down…. I think it’s reached it’s reading limit for the day.

80 offensive_username  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:12:01pm

MSNBC: slightly less politicized than Fox News and moderately better at hiding it.

Way to raise the bar, guys.

81 Eclectic Infidel  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:12:18pm

Protests in downtown Oakland.

Mehserle got two years.

Now I know why I’ve been hearing nothing but sirens and multiple helicopters for the past hour. Oh shit. This is bad…now I’m hearing loud speakers and I’m well over two miles from downtown.

82 prairiefire  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:12:28pm

re: #77 Killgore Trout

You should put out a tip jar.

83 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:13:30pm

re: #73 brookly red

censorship!

Sense-orship you mean!

84 jaunte  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:14:16pm

re: #80 offensive_username

MSNBC: slightly less politicized than Fox News and moderately better at hiding it.

Way to raise the bar, guys.

They do have more openly lesbian secret vampires.

85 First As Tragedy, Then As Farce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:14:17pm

re: #80 offensive_username

MSNBC: slightly less politicized than Fox News and moderately better at hiding it assuming at least some of their audience has two sparking neurons to rub together.

Fix’t

86 Varek Raith  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:14:19pm

re: #80 offensive_username

See you in another 56 days?
;)

87 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:14:24pm

re: #52 elbruce

I would agree with the requirement (mentioned by Rachel) that a journalist should mention that they donated to someone if they interview or talk about them, on-air. It would be the equivalent of disclosure standards in print journalism.

FOX “News” states that they have such a standard, but apparently do nothing whatsoever to enforce it.

For all we know, FOX has the exact same rule as MSNBC, the difference being their employees did inform management and thus had nothing to report- and therein lies the problem.

If there is no public disclosure, of what use is the rule? I’m sure journalists at CNN, MSNBC and other networks report their contributions. This became news because Olbermann did not report his donations.

Public disclosure across the board.

88 Killgore Trout  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:14:38pm

re: #82 prairiefire

You should put out a tip jar.

I think it’s the bamboo fore I’ve been cooking over. There’s something about the smell. One compliment came even before the meat was on the grill.

89 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:14:41pm

re: #72 negativ

Booo :(

(chanting) OZZY! OZZY! OZZY! OZZY!

What the huh?

90 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:14:41pm

re: #80 offensive_username

Fox News Channel: Shockingly more politicized than, well, EVERYONE, and not even trying to hide it at all.

Way to shit all over the national discourse, guys.

91 apox  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:15:04pm

I liked this video — what I really liked was in the end of Bill Maher’s show when he slaughters (imo) that magical balance fairy even more. It’s a good watch.

92 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:15:31pm

re: #77 Killgore Trout

I had an unusually high number of compliments on the odor of my pork chops tonight while grilling on the big green egg. Garlic, lemon juice, marjoram and Old Bay. 4 compliments from strangers and one even came up on the porch asking for the recipe.

In some parts of deepest darkest Brooklyn some folks still roast suckling pigs in the front yard and sell them by the pound self serve… alas I don’t eat meat but it sure smells good.

93 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:15:37pm

re: #81 eclectic infidel

Stay safe, EI. Stay inside if you can help it.

94 Killgore Trout  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:15:47pm

re: #88 Killgore Trout

fore=fire
/I stink

95 Varek Raith  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:16:22pm

Later gators.

96 Usually refered to as anyways  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:16:26pm

Can this happen in the USA?

Court overturns lying politician’s election win

Britain’s shadow immigration minister Phil Woolas has been ordered to forfeit his seat in Parliament after High Court judges ruled he lied during his election campaign.

The judges heard Mr Woolas ran a “risky” campaign, stirring up racial tensions in campaign leaflets by suggesting his opponent Elwyn Watkins was pandering to Muslim militants.

More here…

97 prairiefire  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:16:29pm

re: #93 Slumbering Behemoth

Stay safe, EI. Stay inside if you can help it.

Yes, stay safe. Lock the doors, turn off the lights.

98 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:16:57pm

re: #83 Dragon_Lady

Sense-orship you mean!

so you made him an offer he could not refuse?

99 elbruce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:17:44pm

It’s worth mentioning that since the Citizens United SCOTUS case, donating to a political cause is quite clearly a constitutionally protected right for both persons and corporate entities.

It is not legal for an employment contract to require you to give up your constitutional rights. If it were, then indentured servitude would be currently legal. Which it is not.

Olbermann might have an actionable lawsuit on this unless he gets his show back pronto. And don’t think he isn’t the kind of guy who wouldn’t go for suing MSNBC if it came down to it.

100 Killgore Trout  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:17:58pm

re: #92 brookly red

In some parts of deepest darkest Brooklyn some folks still roast suckling pigs in the front yard and sell them by the pound self serve… alas I don’t eat meat but it sure smells good.

I ear pig ears are especially delicious. I’ve never had them but I’m dying to try.

101 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:18:02pm

re: #98 brookly red

so you made him an offer he could not refuse?

If you mean after that comment I kicked him off the computer, YOU BET!

102 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:18:59pm

re: #100 Killgore Trout

I ear pig ears are especially delicious. I’ve never had them but I’m dying to try.

think slab bacon…

103 Dark_Falcon  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:19:05pm

re: #96 ozbloke

Can this happen in the USA?

Court overturns lying politician’s election win

Britain’s shadow immigration minister Phil Woolas has been ordered to forfeit his seat in Parliament after High Court judges ruled he lied during his election campaign.

The judges heard Mr Woolas ran a “risky” campaign, stirring up racial tensions in campaign leaflets by suggesting his opponent Elwyn Watkins was pandering to Muslim militants.

More here…

No, it can’t happen here. The Supreme Court has ruled that you can’t overturn an election because the politician lied. Freedom of Speech, which does cover lying.

104 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:19:16pm

re: #100 Killgore Trout

I ear pig ears are especially delicious. I’ve never had them but I’m dying to try.

Wait, wait, wait… don’t they give pigs ears to dogs as treats? Yuck!

105 elbruce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:19:24pm

re: #87 researchok

For all we know, FOX has the exact same rule as MSNBC, the difference being their employees did inform management and thus had nothing to report- and therein lies the problem.

If there is no public disclosure, of what use is the rule? I’m sure journalists at CNN, MSNBC and other networks report their contributions. This became news because Olbermann did not report his donations.

Public disclosure across the board.

I refer you back to the video at top. FOX “News” stated that their rule was that anchors would state on the air whether they had donated to people they were interviewing or covering. Those anchors (shown: Hannity) did not do so. There were no repercussions whatsoever.

It would be a good rule, if it were actually enforced.

106 Usually refered to as anyways  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:19:33pm

re: #103 Dark_Falcon

Thanks DF…

107 prairiefire  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:19:35pm

re: #94 Killgore Trout

fore=fire
/I stink

I’ve heard many good things about the Green Egg. This KC florist was one of the first to carry it.trappandcompany.com

108 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:20:10pm

re: #104 Dragon_Lady

Wait, wait, wait… don’t they give pigs ears to dogs as treats? Yuck!

they are commonly sold pickled in jars…

109 b_sharp  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:20:58pm

Watching you guys banter is a lot of fun but I’ve got to hit the sack.

G’night.

110 elbruce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:21:45pm

re: #103 Dark_Falcon

No, it can’t happen here. The Supreme Court has ruled that you can’t overturn an election because the politician lied. Freedom of Speech, which does cover lying.

True; the vote is the vote. If you could overturn the will of the misguided people, then you don’t have democracy at all.

As an interesting aside, there has been some discussion regarding impeaching Supreme Court justices if it can be demonstrated that they lied during their confirmation hearings. Not that that’s actually going to happen, and not that it’s directly relevant, but…

111 Eclectic Infidel  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:22:32pm

From SFGate.com:

The crowd had demonstrated peacefully at City Hall until about 6:25 p.m., when it began walking southeast on 14th Street. Several in the crowd said they were headed to the Fruitvale BART station, which is about three miles from City Hall.

The station is where Mehserle fatally shot Oscar Grant, an unarmed train rider, early Jan. 1, 2009.

About 100 police officers formed a line to stop the march near Laney College at about 6:45 p.m. One protester threw a soda can at the riot-gear-clad police, and within 15 minutes, the crowd had broken through the construction fence at a nearby park and made its way past Lake Merritt.

From there, demonstrators marched along International Boulevard, and then wandered the streets until police trapped them on Sixth Avenue between East 17th and East 18th streets. As they milled about, they smashed about a dozen car windows and jumped on top of taxi cabs.

The situation turned dangerous when a protester ripped the holster and gun from a police officer’s belt, Police Chief Anthony Batts said at a news conference. The protester was swarmed by other officers and arrested.

One police officer was hit by a car - possibly a patrol car - and just past 7 p.m., Batts decided to put an end to the demonstration.

He ordered the march declared an unlawful assembly, based on the incident with the officer’s gun, and at 7:40 p.m. police began arresting people.

By then, the 300 to 500 demonstrators who had been gathered at City Hall had dwindled to about 100 people, corralled on the street in a modest residential neighborhood of apartments and houses. While the police began the arrests, some protesters fled through back yards, others banged on cars, and some lit a trash can fire.

One man confronted protesters after finding a big dent in his car, saying, “That’s justice? It’s anger.”

One protester yelled back, “I’m marching, man!”

BART closed the Fruitvale Station as the marchers headed that way, letting trains through but not letting them stop.

Read more: sfgate.com

112 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:22:56pm

re: #105 elbruce

I refer you back to the video at top. FOX “News” stated that their rule was that anchors would state on the air whether they had donated to people they were interviewing or covering. Those anchors (shown: Hannity) did not do so. There were no repercussions whatsoever.

It would be a good rule, if it were actually enforced.

If that rule is in writing, fire the bastard.

Other than that, I say public disclosure not just by news anchors, but by news writers.personnel and editorial staff.

If you are in a position of influence, we ought to know to whom your political contributions are made.

This sunlight also keep journalists from being pressured by politicians as well.

113 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:22:59pm

re: #108 brookly red

they are commonly sold pickled in jars…

Pickled pigs feet I have heard of, but there is no way you’ll every get me to eat one let alone a pigs ear! There are just some things that should never and will never cross my lips! I guess I didn’t need that desert after all….

114 Killgore Trout  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:23:20pm

re: #107 prairiefire

I’ve heard many good things about the Green Egg. This KC florist was one of the first to carry it.[Link: www.trappandcompany.com…]

I’m not a kitchen gadget guy and I’m very cheap but I’m very happy with my investment in a big green egg. I use it all year round and I almost never cook meat indoors anymore.

115 3eff Jeff  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:24:50pm

en.wikipedia.org

Just thought of checking in on our friend Art Robinson. He lost. In fact, it was a great year for Oregon incumbents, they all won. So, my neighbor to the north did not drink the tea. Thank you, Oregon.

(My apologies if this already got posted.)

116 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:26:16pm

re: #114 Killgore Trout

I’m not a kitchen gadget guy and I’m very cheap but I’m very happy with my investment in a big green egg. I use it all year round and I almost never cook meat indoors anymore.

meat tastes best cooked in a cave…

117 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:27:17pm

re: #27 jaunte

John Boehner tweets:

We’ll wait and see.

Awesome. Can’t wait. The GOP will let Federal money to their home districts dry up. That should go over well.

118 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:27:36pm

G’nite all.

I have important things to do.

Nobel peace prize type things.

*hides game disk behind back*

Bye.

119 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:27:38pm

re: #113 Dragon_Lady

Pickled pigs feet I have heard of, but there is no way you’ll every get me to eat one let alone a pigs ear! There are just some things that should never and will never cross my lips! I guess I didn’t need that desert after all…

well they are quite good… well if you eat meat in the first place.

120 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:28:17pm

re: #118 EmmmieG

Whatchya playin’?

121 elbruce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:28:30pm

We got Kitzhaber back. That’s weird.re: #115 3eff Jeff

[Link: en.wikipedia.org…]

Just thought of checking in on our friend Art Robinson. He lost. In fact, it was a great year for Oregon incumbents, they all won. So, my neighbor to the north did not drink the tea. Thank you, Oregon.

(My apologies if this already got posted.)

Looks like we’re getting Kitzhaber back. That’s weird. Oddly, it looks like the Oregon state senate has gone about 50/50 Republican. Of course, an Oregon Republican isn’t anything like a Texas Republican, so it probably won’t mean much in the long run. Still, something to keep an eye on…

122 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:28:34pm

re: #120 Slumbering Behemoth

Whatchya playin’?

Playing games? Me?

123 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:28:49pm

Fox News has no political or professional ethics. Again, I’ll say that Fox News is really GOP News. Which is why they should go under FEC scrutiny.

124 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:30:17pm

re: #122 EmmmieG

Aw, don’t tease…

125 Dark_Falcon  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:30:25pm

So, since Rodan decided to show his troll ass here tonight, I present a look at a forthcoming LGF/D&D Crossover:

Prince of Blogstalking is an adventure for players at level 30 or higher. IT places the players on a quest to stop Dorkus from finding the Master Hacker’s Password, a tool that would allow Dorkus to take over accounts at will and would make him able to troll with impunity. Featuring battles against the Vodka swilling “Hater Princess”, lame songs from the Butthurtmonkey, vile threats at every turn, and a chance to banish Dorkus back to the Fever Swamp for all time, Prince of Blogstalking is sure to entertain. So be on the lookout for it, and give Dorkus the spanking his asshole trolling has earned him.

126 elbruce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:31:01pm

re: #123 Gus 802

Fox News has no political or professional ethics. Again, I’ll say that Fox News is really GOP News. Which is why they should go under FEC scrutiny.

Hell, the total advertising value of their entire broadcasting time should be counted as a contribution to the GOP, if the FEC really wanted to go for accuracy…

127 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:31:29pm

re: #119 brookly red

well they are quite good… well if you eat meat in the first place.

Oh yeah, I’m a carnivore born and bred, its just something about pigs feet and all the muck they walk around in when they’re alive that gets me! I’ve seen and smelled a pig’s pen, and that’s just not something I want in my mouth!

128 Stanley Sea  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:32:53pm

re: #100 Killgore Trout

I ear pig ears are especially delicious. I’ve never had them but I’m dying to try.

Typo of the eve

129 elbruce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:32:56pm

re: #125 Dark_Falcon

Prince of Blogstalking is an adventure for players at level 30 or higher. IT places the players on a quest to stop Dorkus from finding the Master Hacker’s Password, a tool that would allow Dorkus to take over accounts at will and would make him able to troll with impunity. Featuring battles against the Vodka swilling “Hater Princess”, lame songs from the Butthurtmonkey, vile threats at every turn, and a chance to banish Dorkus back to the Fever Swamp for all time, Prince of Blogstalking is sure to entertain. So be on the lookout for it, and give Dorkus the spanking his asshole trolling has earned him.

All I can do at this point is quote the great film “Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back:”

Man… I don’t know what the FUCK you just said, Little Kid, but you’re special man, you reached out, and you touch a brother’s heart.

130 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:33:46pm

re: #125 Dark_Falcon

So, since Rodan decided to show his troll ass here tonight, I present a look at a forthcoming LGF/D&D Crossover:

Prince of Blogstalking is an adventure for players at level 30 or higher. IT places the players on a quest to stop Dorkus from finding the Master Hacker’s Password, a tool that would allow Dorkus to take over accounts at will and would make him able to troll with impunity. Featuring battles against the Vodka swilling “Hater Princess”, lame songs from the Butthurtmonkey, vile threats at every turn, and a chance to banish Dorkus back to the Fever Swamp for all time, Prince of Blogstalking is sure to entertain. So be on the lookout for it, and give Dorkus the spanking his asshole trolling has earned him.

RWC want’s to know where? When? Which topic did the troll show his head on?

131 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:34:02pm

re: #123 Gus 802

Fox News has no political or professional ethics. Again, I’ll say that Fox News is really GOP News. Which is why they should go under FEC scrutiny.

oh please… the FEC, yeah government controlled news works so well in the free world. If you don’t like Fox don’t watch it… personally I don’t watch any TV yeah like that.

132 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:35:29pm

re: #125 Dark_Falcon

That was Rodan? Must not have had his wheaties this morning.

133 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:35:36pm

re: #1 Ojoe

As usual, you got nothing.

Maybe you should hold off on the comments and just give us links to sunsets.

134 Killgore Trout  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:36:15pm

re: #128 Stanley Sea

I can’t ‘ear you, I’m ‘armless.

135 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:36:36pm

re: #133 palomino

As usual, you got nothing.

Maybe you should hold off on the comments and just give us links to sunsets.

you waited 132 comments for that?

136 First As Tragedy, Then As Farce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:38:09pm

re: #76 Slumbering Behemoth

Different kinds of labs.

A bunch of years ago, a huge black lab - a stray - somehow decided he was going to move into my house. Quite literally, I came home from work one day to find this amazingly filthy and mud-caked beast sitting in front of my door. He just sat there like he owned the place. Long story shorter, he kept hanging around like he really thought he belonged there, and after 2 or 3 days of this, the ex and I decided we might as well bring him into the fold.

It turned out to be a good decision. He had his flaws, but he was a remarkably easy dog to train and deal with, especially considering that we acquired him as an adult stray. My brother-in-law at the time had a truly unmanageable jackass 4 year-old kid, and the kid’s parents being the idiots they were, he was allowed to torment my dogs without supervision at all times. I can’t count the number of times that kid performed every action that should have resulted in a mauling: pestering the dog while it’s asleep, screwing around with its food bowl during dinner time, bludgeoning the dog with plastic Fischer-Price toys, etc. Yet this weird black lab endured all of that stoically and without malice. If the kid had done any of that to me, I would probably have backhanded him.

137 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:38:57pm

re: #123 Gus 802

Fox News has no political or professional ethics. Again, I’ll say that Fox News is really GOP News. Which is why they should go under FEC scrutiny.

You really want the government regulating the first amendment rights of the news media? FOX makes no bones about what their doing and neither do any of the other stations, I for one could care less about the shameless plugs! We have to live with the crap that all the TV and cable stations put out, and its up to us to either listen if we want to or turn off the slop if we don’t want to. I do not want big brother telling me or anyone else what we can and cannot listen to!

138 Stanley Sea  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:39:24pm

re: #92 brookly red

In some parts of deepest darkest Brooklyn some folks still roast suckling pigs in the front yard and sell them by the pound self serve… alas I don’t eat meat but it sure smells good.

There is nothing, nothing, as good as a suckling pig done over the coals. The process, the tradition, the fricking succulent taste.

I grew up in Florida with some sweet neighbors. Ahhh memories. It probably will never happen again.

139 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:39:42pm

re: #131 brookly red

oh please… the FEC, yeah government controlled news works so well in the free world. If you don’t like Fox don’t watch it… personally I don’t watch any TV yeah like that.

Looks like payed political advertising to me.

In the end this shows that MSNBC is on higher ethical ground then Fox News.

140 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:40:01pm

re: #123 Gus 802

Fox News has no political or professional ethics. Again, I’ll say that Fox News is really GOP News. Which is why they should go under FEC scrutiny.

Gus-

A quick search indicates that Hannity- like Maddow- is not a news anchor, but rather a show host.

Therein lies a big part of the problem. The lines between news and entertainment has become more and more blurred. Keith Olbermann is a host, not a news anchor.

On the other hand, all these cable networks do have real journalists and news anchors. Brit Hume is not Hannity and Brian Williams is not Olbermann. Because they are both featured on news networks the lines are further blurred.

That in no way excuses what is a clear FOX tilt, but it does blur the line.

Entertainment can’t be measured in the same way news can.

How to fix it, save for a scroll at the bottom of the screen, I don’t know.

141 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:40:12pm

re: #137 Dragon_Lady

You really want the government regulating the first amendment rights of the news media? FOX makes no bones about what their doing and neither do any of the other stations, I for one could care less about the shameless plugs! We have to live with the crap that all the TV and cable stations put out, and its up to us to either listen if we want to or turn off the slop if we don’t want to. I do not want big brother telling me or anyone else what we can and cannot listen to!

right fuckin on.

142 prairiefire  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:40:14pm

OK Go, “White Knuckles”:

143 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:40:41pm

re: #124 Slumbering Behemoth

Aw, don’t tease…

I’m about to disappoint you.

Just a simple adventure game.

I like playing games that my kids can play, too.

144 Dark_Falcon  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:40:48pm

re: #132 Rightwingconspirator

That was Rodan? Must not have had his wheaties this morning.

He was Lisette. Charles said the troll was from Florida, and that almost always means Rodan. He’s always trying to sneak in here and spew. Then Charles catches him, boots him, and leaves him more Butthurt than ever before.

145 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:41:07pm

And with that, good night. For real.

146 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:41:47pm

re: #139 Gus 802

Looks like payed political advertising to me.

In the end this shows that MSNBC is on higher ethical ground then Fox News.

in the end you still are watching the boob tube, and it shows.

147 First As Tragedy, Then As Farce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:41:50pm

re: #89 Dragon_Lady

What the huh?

Quite the dud, I realize.

In your universe, the tequila-soaked person has been banned from the computer. In another reality, the tequila-soaked person is a rock star stumbling around backstage while the audience demands an encore.

Never mind.

148 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:42:01pm

re: #137 Dragon_Lady

You really want the government regulating the first amendment rights of the news media? FOX makes no bones about what their doing and neither do any of the other stations, I for one could care less about the shameless plugs! We have to live with the crap that all the TV and cable stations put out, and its up to us to either listen if we want to or turn off the slop if we don’t want to. I do not want big brother telling me or anyone else what we can and cannot listen to!

Post Wing means less TV politics, no pundits, and a wary eye 24/7.

149 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:42:10pm

Fox News: The GOP Channel

150 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:43:03pm

re: #138 Stanley Sea

There is nothing, nothing, as good as a suckling pig done over the coals. The process, the tradition, the fricking succulent taste.

I grew up in Florida with some sweet neighbors. Ahhh memories. It probably will never happen again.

well I would invite you to Brooklyn, but, well you know…

151 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:43:14pm

re: #146 brookly red

in the end you still are watching the boob tube, and it shows.

Oh, I see. You want to insult me? Whatever redneck.

152 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:43:21pm

re: #147 negativ

Quite the dud, I realize.

In your universe, the tequila-soaked person has been banned from the computer. In another reality, the tequila-soaked person is a rock star stumbling around backstage while the audience demands an encore.

Never mind.

Well I spoke , uh typed too soon! He went and found the laptop. Oh well, I tried… *sigh*

153 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:43:54pm

re: #144 Dark_Falcon

Thx. I was unaware of the geo reference. So mild mannered though… Unlike another occasion when we had a few words.

154 prairiefire  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:44:41pm

re: #152 Dragon_Lady

re: #153 Rightwingconspirator

Ha!!!

155 Stanley Sea  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:44:48pm

re: #148 Rightwingconspirator

Post Wing means less TV politics, no pundits, and a wary eye 24/7.

You sneak!

156 wee fury  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:45:49pm

re: #142 prairiefire

OK Go, “White Knuckles”:

[Video]

Liked it. Thanks.

157 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:45:53pm

OT: I just got into a conversation with a tea partier. There are competing protests every Fri. afternoon at the intersection of Ventura Blvd and Laurel Canyon here in LA. I bumped into the guy and we struck up a conversation.

I don’t where these folks get their info. A few of his claims:

1) 35% of tea partiers self-identify as Democrats.

2) Obama wants to “collectivize” everyone’s 401k.

3) Even if AIG, GM and BofA had all collapsed, we would be better off if we hadn’t had TARP, bailouts, stimulus. Unemployment? Credit? Stock market? Consumer confidence? None of these would have been a problem because, again, the rest of the economy would have “absorbed” these losses. I know many economists have disagreed with both Bush and Obama, but does anyone know of a serious economist who believes this?

158 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:45:59pm

re: #136 negativ

You are truly a kind soul. I’m not much of an animal rights person, but I don’t tolerate that kind of crap. I get that from my late grandpa. The little old dude caught a few big teens throwing rocks at his dog, confronted the largest of the trio and knocked him right the fuck out.

159 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:46:43pm

re: #151 Gus 802

Oh, I see. You want to insult me? Whatever redneck.

no you do that just fine yourself… but thank you for the redneck comment as a NYC democratic Jew it makes me feel so macho…

160 Killgore Trout  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:47:17pm

re: #157 palomino

Ron Paul!

161 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:47:21pm

re: #143 EmmmieG

Aw, am I gonna hafta beg?

162 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:47:24pm

re: #155 Stanley Sea

You bet. Actually I set aside the Tequila in favor of a 4/20 indulgence as suits leaving a frustrating week behind.

163 prairiefire  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:47:55pm

re: #157 palomino

Hey, to answer your earlier question, I do not know what the heck is going on at NBC.
Think Progress says this:thinkprogress.org

164 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:48:09pm

re: #157 palomino

I have got to go and video that…

165 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:48:23pm

re: #159 brookly red

no you do that just fine yourself… but thank you for the redneck comment as a NYC democratic Jew it makes me feel so macho…

Screw you. You want to call me a boob when I was keeping personalities out of it.

166 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:48:24pm

re: #161 Slumbering Behemoth

Aw, am I gonna hafta beg?

you just did…

167 Thundermother(it will turn your head around)  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:48:31pm

re: #159 brookly red

If you don’t watch Fox News, why do you comment on it? Do you also review books you’ve never read?

168 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:48:54pm

re: #155 Stanley Sea

You sneak!

He kinda reminds me of the night before Xmas, you know the little kid who sneaks down the stairs and shakes his presents? *shakes her head and sighs*

169 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:49:53pm

re: #160 Killgore Trout

Ron Paul!

That part made it even stranger. The guy hated Ron Paul (but was silent about Rand). He called libertarians “anarchists with neckties.” But he seems to agree with the Ron Paul crowd on a lot, even if he wouldn’t admit it.

Do you know of any serious economists who believe we’d be better off if three of our five largest corporations had gone under?

170 prairiefire  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:50:01pm

re: #163 prairiefire

I mean in regards to Keith Olbermann.

171 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:50:05pm

re: #166 brookly red

That ain’t begging. That’s fore-play to begging. Fore-beg.

172 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:50:45pm

re: #158 Slumbering Behemoth

You are truly a kind soul. I’m not much of an animal rights person, but I don’t tolerate that kind of crap. I get that from my late grandpa. The little old dude caught a few big teens throwing rocks at his dog, confronted the largest of the trio and knocked him right the fuck out.

Go Gramps! I love that kind of person! You come from good stock S.B.!

173 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:50:55pm

re: #169 palomino

I liked the libertarians better when they were just Republicans that wanted to get high.

174 SteveC  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:50:58pm

re: #159 brookly red

no you do that just fine yourself… but thank you for the redneck comment as a NYC democratic Jew it makes me feel so macho…

175 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:51:04pm

re: #165 Gus 802

Screw you. You want to call me a boob when I was keeping personalities out of it.

oh please spare me, you were the one who called me a redneck & downding everything I say… and now you stepped in shit and somehow that is my fault? please.

176 Stanley Sea  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:51:33pm

re: #157 palomino

OT: I just got into a conversation with a tea partier. There are competing protests every Fri. afternoon at the intersection of Ventura Blvd and Laurel Canyon here in LA. I bumped into the guy and we struck up a conversation.

I don’t where these folks get their info. A few of his claims:

1) 35% of tea partiers self-identify as Democrats.

2) Obama wants to “collectivize” everyone’s 401k.

3) Even if AIG, GM and BofA had all collapsed, we would be better off if we hadn’t had TARP, bailouts, stimulus. Unemployment? Credit? Stock market? Consumer confidence? None of these would have been a problem because, again, the rest of the economy would have “absorbed” these losses. I know many economists have disagreed with both Bush and Obama, but does anyone know of a serious economist who believes this?

The 401K thingy = Limbaugh today

177 SteveC  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:51:39pm

re: #160 Killgore Trout

Ron Paul!

You know not what you ask!

178 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:52:04pm

The stars are out of alignment.

No one is beating up on me.

179 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:52:07pm

re: #175 brookly red

oh please spare me, you were the one who called me a redneck & downding everything I say… and now you stepped in shit and somehow that is my fault? please.

Check genius. I didn’t down ding anything you said here and have been basically ignoring you for the past month — for the most part. Paranoid much?

180 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:53:02pm

re: #175 brookly red

oh please spare me, you were the one who called me a redneck & downding everything I say… and now you stepped in shit and somehow that is my fault? please.

And I don’t down ding you because I feel sorry for you.

181 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:53:13pm

re: #167 alpuz

If you don’t watch Fox News, why do you comment on it? Do you also review books you’ve never read?

Nice try… but I didn’t comment on it, so go fish?

182 SteveC  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:54:12pm

re: #178 researchok

The stars are out of alignment.

No one is beating up on me.

“When you go back out there I want you to hit the pace car.”

“Hit the pace car?!?”

“You’ve hit everything else on four wheels, I want you to be perfect.”

183 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:54:22pm

re: #175 brookly red

oh please spare me, you were the one who called me a redneck & downding everything I say… and now you stepped in shit and somehow that is my fault? please.

I think this is where you can just *GAZE* him B.R., name calling is just another form of bullying and if he wants to call you names just ignore him.

184 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:54:22pm

Benny

185 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:54:42pm

re: #182 SteveC

“When you go back out there I want you to hit the pace car.”

“Hit the pace car?!?”

“You’ve hit everything else on four wheels, I want you to be perfect.”

LOL- that was good!

186 Thundermother(it will turn your head around)  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:54:54pm

re: #181 brookly red

‘in the end you still are watching the boob tube, and it shows.’

What do you mean by this?

187 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:55:19pm

re: #183 Dragon_Lady

I think this is where you can just *GAZE* him B.R., name calling is just another form of bullying and if he wants to call you names just ignore him.

Really? You must not have been reading. He’s the creep that called me boob.

188 SteveC  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:55:28pm

re: #184 Gus 802

Benny

… and the Jets?

189 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:55:45pm

Must be the late night wingnut hour.

190 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:55:57pm

re: #183 Dragon_Lady

I think this is where you can just *GAZE* him B.R., name calling is just another form of bullying and if he wants to call you names just ignore him.

yeah but he called me redneck… it kinda turned me on if you know what I mean ;)

191 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:56:29pm

re: #172 Dragon_Lady

Go Gramps! I love that kind of person! You come from good stock S.B.!

Maybe. Gramps was a truly hard core, mean SOB. Loved to brawl, and had the kind of rep that drew many challengers. No victors, but many challengers. Had quite a cruel streak, but was nothing but nice to his grand-kids.

I loved him, even if everyone else in the family hated his guts. I was the only one to cry at his viewing. Some even made snide remarks.

192 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:57:05pm

re: #186 alpuz

‘in the end you still are watching the boob tube, and it shows.’

What do you mean by this?

if your looking for street cred you came to the wrong place…

193 Stanley Sea  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:57:32pm

omg

194 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:57:44pm

re: #163 prairiefire

Hey, to answer your earlier question, I do not know what the heck is going on at NBC.
Think Progress says this:[Link: thinkprogress.org…]

Makes sense that the Comcast merger may have something to do with it. It is a huge merger, both in a financial and media sense.

At least this whole episode is blowing the top off the idea that only Olbermann donates to candidates.

195 Max  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:57:47pm

A member of CAIR is suing the state of Oklahoma over its sharia law ban.

196 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:57:59pm

re: #178 researchok

The stars are out of alignment.

No one is beating up on me.

Fuck. You.
/

197 Thundermother(it will turn your head around)  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:58:14pm

re: #192 brookly red

Got it, thanks.

198 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:58:25pm

re: #190 brookly red

yeah but he called me redneck… it kinda turned me on if you know what I mean ;)

Yeah. You’re right. My mistake.

WINGNUT

199 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:58:40pm

re: #196 Slumbering Behemoth

Fuck. You.
/

The stars are back in alignment.

200 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:58:55pm

re: #187 Gus 802

Really? You must not have been reading. He’s the creep that called me boob.

no I called TV the boobtube… I would never call you a boob. I like boobs after all.

201 prairiefire  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:59:24pm

re: #191 Slumbering Behemoth

I have a couple of grandfathers that were great to me, but my mom and dad’s family said “well, he had mellowed by the time you were born.”
You mourned him, that was probably enough to rest his soul.

202 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:59:25pm

re: #195 Max D. Reinhardt

A member of CAIR is suing the state of Oklahoma over its sharia law ban.

what a surprise.

203 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:59:30pm

re: #191 Slumbering Behemoth

Maybe. Gramps was a truly hard core, mean SOB. Loved to brawl, and had the kind of rep that drew many challengers. No victors, but many challengers. Had quite a cruel streak, but was nothing but nice to his grand-kids.

I loved him, even if everyone else in the family hated his guts. I was the only one to cry at his viewing. Some even made snide remarks.

If they couldn’t see what that tough exterior hid that’s their problem. Smart people see underneath and see the real person, I personally think you’re one of the smartest people around.

204 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:59:46pm

re: #173 Rightwingconspirator

I liked the libertarians better when they were just Republicans that wanted to get high.

Couldn’t agree more (even if it does sound like something Bill Maher would say).

205 SteveC  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:00:52pm

re: #198 Gus 802

Yeah. You’re right. My mistake.

WINGNUT

John Dickinson: Are you calling me a coward?
John Adams: Yes… coward!
John Dickinson: Madman!
John Adams: Landlord!
John Dickinson: LAWYER!

(Riot breaks out)

206 Dark_Falcon  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:01:05pm

re: #195 Max D. Reinhardt

A member of CAIR is suing the state of Oklahoma over its sharia law ban.

THE ISLAMISTS ARE USING LAWFARE!! ANY LAWYER WHO REPRESENTS THEM IS A TRAITOR!!1 WE MUST PUT ANY SUCH LAWYER TO DEATH!!!1

/Pam “Shrieky” Geller

207 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:01:10pm

I’ll be glad when things return back to normal, after the weekend.

Election week takes a toll.

208 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:01:15pm

re: #176 Stanley Sea

The 401K thingy = Limbaugh today

I asked the guy what this new scary govt program was called. Of course he “forgot” but promised to email me. Can’t wait to get a link to Limbaugh.

209 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:02:04pm

re: #190 brookly red

yeah but he called me redneck… it kinda turned me on if you know what I mean ;)

OMG! LOL! Don’t quite know what to say to that…except whatever floats your boat I guess.

210 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:02:11pm

re: #208 palomino

I asked the guy what this new scary govt program was called. Of course he “forgot” but promised to email me. Can’t wait to get a link to Limbaugh.

you could just go to his site…

211 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:02:55pm

re: #207 researchok

I’ll be glad when things return back to normal, after the weekend.

Election week takes a toll.

Don’t you mean makes a bunch of trolls? ;)

212 prairiefire  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:03:19pm

re: #210 brookly red

you could just go to his site…

Maybe he/she does not want to pay money to get the subscription site.

213 First As Tragedy, Then As Farce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:03:20pm

re: #157 palomino

OT: I just got into a conversation with a tea partier. There are competing protests every Fri. afternoon at the intersection of Ventura Blvd and Laurel Canyon here in LA. I bumped into the guy and we struck up a conversation.

If only Frank Zappa were still alive. :(

214 Dark_Falcon  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:03:36pm

re: #207 researchok

I’ll be glad when things return back to normal, after the weekend.

Election week takes a toll.

True That.

215 SteveC  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:04:00pm

re: #206 Dark_Falcon

THE ISLAMISTS ARE USING LAWFARE!! ANY LAWYER WHO REPRESENTS THEM IS A TRAITOR!!1 WE MUST PUT ANY SUCH LAWYER TO DEATH!!!1

/Pam “Shrieky” Geller

Oh my God…. LAWFARE!

/Women and children to the shelters, man your battle stations!

216 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:04:36pm

re: #201 prairiefire

I have a couple of grandfathers that were great to me, but my mom and dad’s family said “well, he had mellowed by the time you were born.”
You mourned him, that was probably enough to rest his soul.

Nicely said!

217 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:05:28pm

re: #201 prairiefire

Oh, he never mellowed. He was just real nice to us grand-kids for some reason.

re: #203 Dragon_Lady

I can’t sugar coat it, DL. My grandpa was a hard, hard man. He didn’t treat people very well.

218 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:06:12pm

re: #212 prairiefire

Maybe he/she does not want to pay money to get the subscription site.

it is free

219 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:06:31pm

re: #195 Max D. Reinhardt

A member of CAIR is suing the state of Oklahoma over its sharia law ban.

How do you ban something that doesn’t even exist? And that really has no chance of ever existing.

220 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:07:25pm

re: #23 brookly red

Just maybe this contract will be held unenforceable on grounds of 1st amendment rights. Alas really mere wishful thinking. The self declared champions of progressive Democracy eat their own for participating. And a pundit at that. Not a news guy.

It’s like firing Jon Stewart for sending a few jokes to another comedian that got a better gig and needed another good line.

221 prairiefire  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:07:52pm

re: #218 brookly red

it is free

communist./

222 offensive_username  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:08:12pm

re: #90 Slumbering Behemoth

The suspension is ridiculous from the perspective of Olbermann being punished for crossing a line journalists shouldn’t cross. His speech promotes his cause far more than his money did.

It only makes sense as punishment for violating an arbitrary policy.

Maddow’s point at the end of the segment was vacuous because this affair was not an example of upholding standards to keep journalism unbiased. MSNBC’s slogan could be: “Still pretending to be news, unlike those bastards at Fox!”

I give them credit for bending the truth and omitting facts less than Fox does. I give them credit for lying much less. I give them credit for treating their audience as if it takes arguments to mold their political opinions, rather than mere shouting as on Fox.

I give my dog credit for pooping on the rug only when he is mad at me, unlike my other dog who literally can’t hold it for very long and needs to be taken out all the time.

Credit where credit is due. But no more than that.

223 Max  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:08:32pm

re: #219 palomino

How do you ban something that doesn’t even exist? And that really has no chance of ever existing.

It’s already been preemptively banned… by the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

224 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:08:37pm

re: #210 brookly red

you could just go to his site…

Why would I go to Limbaugh’s site of my own volition? I’ve seen and heard enough of his Fatness over the last two decades. Nothing more necessary.

225 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:08:58pm

re: #222 offensive_username

The suspension is ridiculous from the perspective of Olbermann being punished for crossing a line journalists shouldn’t cross. His speech promotes his cause far more than his money did.

It only makes sense as punishment for violating an arbitrary policy.

Maddow’s point at the end of the segment was vacuous because this affair was not an example of upholding standards to keep journalism unbiased. MSNBC’s slogan could be: “Still pretending to be news, unlike those bastards at Fox!”

I give them credit for bending the truth and omitting facts less than Fox does. I give them credit for lying much less. I give them credit for treating their audience as if it takes arguments to mold their political opinions, rather than mere shouting as on Fox.

I give my dog credit for pooping on the rug only when he is mad at me, unlike my other dog who literally can’t hold it for very long and needs to be taken out all the time.

Credit where credit is due. But no more than that.

Looking to make friends?
//

226 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:08:59pm

re: #204 palomino

LOL and ouch. :-)

Anti vax prick he is.

227 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:09:40pm

re: #224 palomino

Why would I go to Limbaugh’s site of my own volition? I’ve seen and heard enough of his Fatness over the last two decades. Nothing more necessary.

I don’t know, you wanted a link ?

228 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:10:00pm

re: #187 Gus 802

Really? You must not have been reading. He’s the creep that called me boob.

Hey, you should be flattered! There are a lot worse parts of the anatomy he/she could have called you! At least boobs are attractive to most people! ;)

229 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:10:13pm

re: #213 negativ

If only Frank Zappa were still alive. :(

Yes, it’s that Valley, the beautiful San Fernando one. Yesterday it was 95 here, hotter than almost any day we had back in July/August. I guess that means AGW is a hoax.

230 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:11:40pm

re: #228 Dragon_Lady

Hey, you should be flattered! There are a lot worse parts of the anatomy he/she could have called you! At least boobs are attractive to most people! ;)

You have a point. That said, as much as I like Gus, I could never look at him in that way.

Ever.

231 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:12:14pm

re: #223 Max D. Reinhardt

It’s already been preemptively banned… by the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

OK, so it’s already constitutionally forbidden. And it doesn’t exist anywhere in Oklahoma. So it’s double massive overkill by the Okie legislature.

232 SteveC  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:12:22pm

re: #219 palomino

How do you ban something that doesn’t even exist? And that really has no chance of ever existing.

That, ladies and gentlemen, is how you win elections. You gather a group of middle-aged, middle-class, middle-income voters who remember with longing an easier time, and you talk to them about family and American values and character. And wave an old photo of the President’s girlfriend and you scream about patriotism and you tell them, she’s to blame for their lot in life, and you go on television and you call her a whore. - Andrew Shepard

233 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:13:03pm

re: #220 Rightwingconspirator

Just maybe this contract will be held unenforceable on grounds of 1st amendment rights. Alas really mere wishful thinking. The self declared champions of progressive Democracy eat their own for participating. And a pundit at that. Not a news guy.

It’s like firing Jon Stewart for sending a few jokes to another comedian that got a better gig and needed another good line.

Lenny Bruce is not afraid! :)

234 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:13:36pm

re: #226 Rightwingconspirator

LOL and ouch. :-)

Anti vax prick he is.

I actually agree with Maher on a lot, but then he goes all anti-vax or pro-Ron Paul and he completely loses me.

235 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:13:53pm

re: #229 palomino

Yes, it’s that Valley, the beautiful San Fernando one. Yesterday it was 95 here, hotter than almost any day we had back in July/August. I guess that means AGW is a hoax.

It hit 101 in Studio City and North Hollywood. I’m seeing my Ficus trees drop an awful lot of leaves and usually that means were in for some really cold weather this winter! Ficus trees don’t go dormant like a lot of other deciduous trees do and I’m see a lot of those dropping their leaves even though its over 90 outside! Hint, hint! Get your sweater and jackets out folks!

236 Dark_Falcon  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:14:34pm

re: #233 brookly red

Lenny Bruce is not afraid! :)

It’s the End of the World, As We Know It.

237 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:15:30pm

re: #236 Dark_Falcon

It’s the End of the World, As We Know It.

and I feel fine…

238 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:15:32pm

re: #227 brookly red

I don’t know, you wanted a link ?

No, I was saying that the misinformed tea partier I talked to earlier (who claimed that Obama was on the verge of “collectivizing” our 401k’s) will probably just be sending me a link to Limbaugh. That’s unlikely to convince me that the tea party guy was right.

239 Dark_Falcon  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:15:43pm

re: #234 palomino

I actually agree with Maher on a lot, but then he goes all anti-vax or pro-Ron Paul and he completely loses me.

I think he’s got enough crazy in him that he is drawn to Paul. It’s called “crank magnetism”.

240 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:16:47pm

Simmer….
//

241 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:17:17pm

re: #240 researchok

Bite. Me.
//

242 SteveC  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:17:32pm

re: #235 Dragon_Lady

Get your sweater and jackets out folks!

One side effect of my heart problems is my body can’t regulate its own temperature very well. It has been in the 60’s here and I feel like I’m freezing!

243 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:17:42pm

re: #234 palomino

I gave up on all the pundits, opinioneers on TV. I fail to feel the need for these AP/Reuters/? English to CNN/ MSNBC/FOX/? English translators.

244 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:17:49pm

re: #217 Slumbering Behemoth

Oh, he never mellowed. He was just real nice to us grand-kids for some reason.

re: #203 Dragon_Lady

I can’t sugar coat it, DL. My grandpa was a hard, hard man. He didn’t treat people very well.

But you have your memories and that’s what counts. Cherish the good ones he obviously loved you and that’s what counts.

245 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:18:07pm

re: #241 Slumbering Behemoth

Bite. Me.
//

You’re not my type either.
/

246 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:18:44pm

BRB

247 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:19:18pm

re: #242 SteveC

One side effect of my heart problems is my body can’t regulate its own temperature very well. It has been in the 60’s here and I feel like I’m freezing!

Ooooh that sucks! I’m sorry to hear that, {{SteveC}}

248 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:19:59pm

re: #245 researchok

You’re not my type either.
/

Yeah, but right now I’m all you got. :P

249 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:20:27pm

re: #232 SteveC

That, ladies and gentlemen, is how you win elections. You gather a group of middle-aged, middle-class, middle-income voters who remember with longing an easier time, and you talk to them about family and American values and character. And wave an old photo of the President’s girlfriend and you scream about patriotism and you tell them, she’s to blame for their lot in life, and you go on television and you call her a whore. - Andrew Shepard

Funny thing, my Mom and Dad voted for Obama. But they still identify with a lot of this cultural shit that you ably and rightfully mock. Like making English (or Amerikun) the official US language.

Actually my Mom did the voting for herself and my father. He has Alzheimer’s so isn’t really capable of filling out the absentee form. I would guess this is pretty common with older couples. But I’m ashamed to think that my mother was involved in ACORN/Black Panther type voter fraud.

250 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:22:48pm

re: #235 Dragon_Lady

It hit 101 in Studio City and North Hollywood. I’m seeing my Ficus trees drop an awful lot of leaves and usually that means were in for some really cold weather this winter! Ficus trees don’t go dormant like a lot of other deciduous trees do and I’m see a lot of those dropping their leaves even though its over 90 outside! Hint, hint! Get your sweater and jackets out folks!

That’s even hotter than I thought. I live in Studio City. We’re lucky—35 degrees is extreme cold here.

251 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:24:24pm

re: #250 palomino

That’s even hotter than I thought. I live in Studio City. We’re lucky—35 degrees is extreme cold here.

You live close by! Howdy neighbor!

252 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:24:36pm

re: #248 Slumbering Behemoth

Yeah, but right now I’m all you got. :P

Right now, I just want know for sure that Dragon Lady isn’t a very large 6’2” tall guy whose real name is Peaches.
//

253 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:25:41pm

re: #250 palomino

We are neighbors. We may have the same congressman, Berman-D (here)

254 Dark_Falcon  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:26:06pm

re: #252 researchok

Right now, I just want know for sure that Dragon Lady isn’t a very large 6’2” tall guy whose real name is Peaches.
//

SMACK!

255 SteveC  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:26:17pm

Heart attack doesn’t stop guy from voting.

“People in the Election Commission weren’t sure what to do,” Kopplin said in a phone interview Tuesday evening from his St. Joseph’s Hospital bed. “Evidently this was a first - a guy with a heart attack wants to vote.”

256 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:26:21pm

re: #239 Dark_Falcon

I think he’s got enough crazy in him that he is drawn to Paul. It’s called “crank magnetism”.

Sometimes I can tolerate Maher because he goes after tea party extremism and his libertarianism is mostly anti-theocratic and pro-legalizing vice.

But you’re right, he’s got a lot of goofy cranky crazy ideas.

257 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:26:39pm

re: #252 researchok

Right now, I just want know for sure that Dragon Lady isn’t a very large 6’2” tall guy whose real name is Peaches.
//

Please take my word for it.

258 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:27:06pm

re: #252 researchok

Right now, I just want know for sure that Dragon Lady isn’t a very large 6’2” tall guy whose real name is Peaches.
//

LOL, OMG! LOL! Try 5’5” Brunette with a rubinesque figure and you’d be a bit closer…

259 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:27:20pm

re: #254 Dark_Falcon

Thx!

260 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:27:23pm

re: #257 Rightwingconspirator

Please take my word for it.

OK.

It’s just that SB is making me nervous….

//

261 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:28:17pm

re: #258 Dragon_Lady

LOL, OMG! LOL! Try 5’5” Brunette with a rubinesque figure and you’d be a bit closer…

/what are you wearing?

262 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:28:30pm

re: #251 Dragon_Lady

You live close by! Howdy neighbor!

Hey there, how ya doin? I love this neighborhood, even though crowded and expensive.

Ever go to the Friday rallies at the Laurel Cyn/Ventura Blvd intersection?

263 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:28:48pm

re: #258 Dragon_Lady


Don’t make me page that..

264 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:28:56pm

re: #261 brookly red

/what are you wearing?

I ain’t tellin’! Just sayin…

265 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:29:16pm

re: #263 Rightwingconspirator

Don’t make me page that..

Fuck you! ///

266 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:29:43pm

re: #258 Dragon_Lady

LOL, OMG! LOL! Try 5’5” Brunette with a rubinesque figure and you’d be a bit closer…

I’m so glad to hear that. I was afraid I’d have to make a choice- you or SB.

Never have I been so happy to know your real name isn’t Peaches.

267 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:30:25pm

re: #262 palomino

Hey there, how ya doin? I love this neighborhood, even though crowded and expensive.

Ever go to the Friday rallies at the Laurel Cyn/Ventura Blvd intersection?

Nah, we like to go take pics in uncrowded places where I can breath!

268 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:30:42pm

re: #252 researchok

Right now, I just want know for sure that Dragon Lady isn’t a very large 6’2” tall guy whose real name is Peaches.
//

Even if that were true about s/he, s/he is spoken for IIRC.

269 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:31:16pm

re: #262 palomino

I may just send D_L over there with our Canon 7D to take in the festivities. Might be a fun page to post.

270 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:31:39pm

re: #268 Slumbering Behemoth

Even if that were true about s/he, s/he is spoken for IIRC.

Uh oh….so it is me and you?

Just to be clear, I always lead.

Always.

//

271 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:31:39pm

re: #253 Rightwingconspirator

We are neighbors. We may have the same congressman, Berman-D (here)

Yeah, I felt kinda sorry for Berman’s opponent. First, the guy’s name is Merlin Froyd.

Second, on his website, he actually lists being a member of student council at NoHo High as one of his only 4 or 5 qualifications to be a Congressman. Not even president or an officer in student council, but just a member.

Third, he of course had no chance to win, and I don’t think managed to bolster his stature in the CA GOP.

272 SteveC  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:31:58pm

re: #261 brookly red

/what are you wearing?

“You shot an elephant in your pajamas? I’ve heard this joke before - `How he got in my pajamas, I’ll never know!’”

“No, I was in my pajamas… the elephant was wearing pink lace lingerie!”

273 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:31:59pm

re: #268 Slumbering Behemoth

Even if that were true about s/he, s/he is spoken for IIRC.

I guess I should have pointed that out earlier :-)

274 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:32:31pm

re: #273 Rightwingconspirator

I guess I should have pointed that out earlier :-)

Am I missing something?

275 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:32:36pm

re: #260 researchok

OK.

It’s just that SB is making me nervous…

//

Calm down, I’m not at all a threat. Unless you want me to be. But keep in mind, that costs extra.
//

276 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:33:03pm

re: #275 Slumbering Behemoth

Calm down, I’m not at all a threat. Unless you want me to be. But keep in mind, that costs extra.
//

ROFL

277 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:33:05pm

re: #268 Slumbering Behemoth

Even if that were true about s/he, s/he is spoken for IIRC.

That’s ok, I haven’t had anyone flirt with me in so long I’ve forgotten what its like. ;)

278 SteveC  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:33:33pm

re: #271 palomino

Second, on his website, he actually lists being a member of student council at NoHo High as one of his only 4 or 5 qualifications to be a Congressman. Not even president or an officer in student council, but just a member.

FACEPALM!

279 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:33:33pm

re: #271 palomino

Berman runs uncontested. No GOP presence. Zip. Nada. They got nothin. Heh. Notice I’m an indy?

280 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:33:46pm

re: #272 SteveC

“You shot an elephant in your pajamas? I’ve heard this joke before - `How he got in my pajamas, I’ll never know!’”

“No, I was in my pajamas… the elephant was wearing pink lace lingerie!”

Hey I didn’t shoot nobody… I was not there and the is defiantly not my gun… thats my story and I am sticking to it.

281 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:33:54pm

re: #265 Dragon_Lady

Oy, real live text pr0n. Hawt.

282 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:34:03pm

re: #277 Dragon_Lady

That’s ok, I haven’t had anyone flirt with me in so long I’ve forgotten what its like. ;)

I’m sorry!

I was just kidding around- no bad intentions whatsoever.

283 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:34:08pm

re: #267 Dragon_Lady

Nah, we like to go take pics in uncrowded places where I can breath!

That’s a terrible intersection for breathing. But the people watching ain’t bad. The conservatives on the south side of Ventura are dedicated: always there with signs…but there are only 3 of them. The liberals on the north side always outnumber them 10 to 1. I just watch usually.

284 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:35:01pm

re: #274 researchok

Well D_L and I are married, posting from the same luxury /// living room.

285 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:35:47pm

re: #282 researchok

It’s all good.

286 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:35:52pm

re: #278 SteveC

FACEPALM!

Sad, isn’t it? He’s only 30, but looks like he’s 17 and should still be in student council.

287 brookly red  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:36:05pm

good night good folks…

288 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:36:29pm

re: #284 Rightwingconspirator

Well D_L and I are married, posting from the same luxury /// living room.

I’m really sorry- I was just having a bit of back and forth fun with SB. My remarks were off the cuff and no more.

289 SteveC  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:37:11pm

re: #280 brookly red

Hey I didn’t shoot nobody… I was not there and the is defiantly not my gun… thats my story and I am sticking to it.

We’ve got that gun in Ballistics right now, and the test is going to come back and that bullet is going to match. This is your one chance to tell us what really happened, because if that test comes back before you come clean we’re gonna hang a charge on you.

//

290 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:37:39pm

re: #279 Rightwingconspirator

Berman runs uncontested. No GOP presence. Zip. Nada. They got nothin. Heh. Notice I’m an indy?

Yeah, Berman gets 80% of the vote. He’s totally safe, the district is too liberal for him to worry. Froyd was nothing more than token opposition. His day job is selling Fords over at the nearest dealership, not that there’s anything wrong with that but it ain’t much of a springboard into politics, at least not to win in a heavily Dem district.

291 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:37:50pm

re: #287 brookly red

good night good folks…

Nighty night my friend! I’m gonna crash too before long, I turn into a pumpkin around 10:00. I’m up way past my bed time as it is!

292 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:37:59pm

re: #285 Rightwingconspirator

It’s all good.

I’m embarrassed- I just referred to your wife as a large guy named Peaches.

I guess I’m off the Holiday party invite list….

293 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:39:11pm

re: #288 researchok

I’m really sorry- I was just having a bit of back and forth fun with SB. My remarks were off the cuff and no more.

No worries, its all in fun and I know it! You haven’t stepped on any toes, and if you did I’ll just smack him up side the head and take the laptop away from him and make him go to bed! ;)

294 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:39:32pm

re: #290 palomino

I email or chat with his staff from time to time. He’s actually pretty moderate for a guy with 80%. Responsive.

295 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:39:52pm

re: #293 Dragon_Lady

No worries, its all in fun and I know it! You haven’t stepped on any toes, and if you did I’ll just smack him up side the head and take the laptop away from him and make him go to bed! ;)

*still embarrassed*

Do I know you?
/

296 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:40:42pm

And does SB hang around to bail my ass out?

Noooooo

297 SteveC  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:42:20pm

re: #296 researchok

And does SB hang around to bail my ass out?

Nooo

Looks like SB is gonna let you take the rap for this one!

298 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:42:51pm

re: #292 researchok
Anything that can be done…. has. Internet rule something or other.
LOL. No harm done, not in the least. After all I agreed with your sentiment. LGF is popular around here. I even have neighbors that share my wifi and lurk.

299 palomino  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:43:34pm

re: #294 Rightwingconspirator

I email or chat with his staff from time to time. He’s actually pretty moderate for a guy with 80%. Responsive.

Yeah, this area’s left of center, but it’s not West Hollywood.

I used to get Berman mixed up with Brad Sherman, but he represents another part of the Valley (farther west). The whole think is further complicated by the fact that Brad Sherman represents (at least part of) Sherman Oaks.

300 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:44:08pm

re: #295 researchok

*still embarrassed*

Do I know you?
/

I’m just your average everyday plant lady, artist, and all around fun person. Its all good, and there’s not a thing wrong with anything you posted!

301 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:44:24pm

re: #298 Rightwingconspirator

Anything that can be done… has. Internet rule something or other.
LOL. No harm done, not in the least. After all I agreed with your sentiment. LGF is popular around here. I even have neighbors that share my wifi and lurk.

I shall rewrite history.

It’s all SB’s fault.

302 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:44:50pm

re: #288 researchok

I’m really sorry- I was just having a bit of back and forth fun with SB. My remarks were off the cuff and no more.

Dude, there are at least a few lines left in the sand that you have not crossed over. Ones that I’ve likely already scattered. If I had to guess, I’d say you’re cool right now.

303 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:45:10pm

re: #300 Dragon_Lady

I’m just your average everyday plant lady, artist, and all around fun person. Its all good, and there’s not a thing wrong with anything you posted!

Thanks to you and your indentured servant for your graciousness.

304 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:46:17pm

re: #302 Slumbering Behemoth

Dude, there are at least a few lines left in the sand that you have not crossed over. Ones that I’ve likely already scattered. If I had to guess, I’d say you’re cool right now.

Well, just be glad I’m not Peaches.

Now, where were we?

//

305 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:47:10pm

re: #299 palomino

Yeah, the districts are all bent around little pockets of opposition. Like a board game created by a schizophrenic.

306 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:47:49pm

re: #304 researchok

Well, just be glad I’m not Peaches.

Now, where were we?

//

We could always just change your name to puddin… LOL!

307 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:48:12pm

re: #305 Rightwingconspirator

Yeah, the districts are all bent around little pockets of opposition. Like a board game created by a schizophrenic.

Schizophrenics.

Now that is something I know about.

308 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:48:56pm

re: #306 Dragon_Lady

We could always just change your name to puddin… LOL!

LOL

Don’t give him any ideas.

309 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:51:53pm

Poor RWC. Wanna go drinking, dude?
/you buy

310 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:52:25pm

OK, change of pace…

I’m a behavioral analyst…you get one question.

311 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:53:20pm

Well Kids I’m tired and its past my bedtime so I’m gonna log off. It’s been fun and I appreciate all the fun we’ve been having. Night, night! And KEEP LAUGHING everyone! :-)

312 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:54:20pm

re: #310 researchok


Or not.

313 Donna Ballard  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:55:43pm

re: #310 researchok

OK, change of pace…

I’m a behavioral analyst…you get one question.

Dude you REALLY, REALLY don’t want me askin you any of THOSE kind of questions! Honest, you don’t! Now I’m gonna log off and hit the sack. Night all!

314 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:55:53pm
315 djameswrites  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:57:55pm

So I just watched the video…

tu quoque 4 and a half minutes why Olberman should get his job back because the silly shills on Fox do the same thing.

Then, she backs that up by pointing out that he has been attacking Fox and Republicans for years, pointing out how scary they are…LOL.

Wahhhhh.

Oh…MSNBC.com identified 143 journalists who made political contributions from 2004 through the start of the 2008 campaign, according to the public records of the Federal Election Commission. Most of the newsroom checkbooks leaned to the left: 125 journalists gave to Democrats and liberal causes. Only 16 gave to Republicans. Two gave to both parties.

125 to 16, but of course there is no institutional bias.

Fox is a shill for the republican party, an answer to a legacy media that had leaned left, unopposed, for my entire lifetime.
Is Fox wrong? Yup.
Are the rest of them wrong? Yup.

Give me the news without the spin, please. If, though, you are admittedly a ‘pundit’, go ahead and spin, but don’t pretend you are a journalist, you are a pundit, Rachel.

316 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:57:59pm

re: #309 Slumbering Behemoth

First round, no problem. I got All Access at the Hard Rock…

317 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:59:17pm

re: #316 Rightwingconspirator

First round, no problem. I got All Access at the Hard Rock…

I wanna go to the Hard Rock buffet in Vegas.

Good reviews.

318 First As Tragedy, Then As Farce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 9:59:47pm

Reposted, for those still awake

319 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:00:28pm

re: #318 negativ

Reposted, for those still awake


[Video]

You are an optimist.

320 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:00:33pm

re: #310 researchok

OK, change of pace…

I’m a behavioral analyst…you get one question.

Okay.
Why?

321 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:02:02pm

re: #320 Rightwingconspirator

Okay.
Why?

Clearly, a feeble attempt at humor on my part.

Emphasis on ‘feeble attempt.’

322 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:02:39pm

re: #81 eclectic infidel

Protests in downtown Oakland.

Mehserle got two years.

Now I know why I’ve been hearing nothing but sirens and multiple helicopters for the past hour. Oh shit. This is bad…now I’m hearing loud speakers and I’m well over two miles from downtown.

I’m in San Francisco tonight. Came over for dinner, and my folks won’t let me on BART to go home.

323 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:03:36pm

re: #322 SanFranciscoZionist

I’m in San Francisco tonight. Came over for dinner, and my folks won’t let me on BART to go home.

Welcome to the Casbah.

324 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:03:52pm

re: #321 researchok

Hm. And mine. As in turning the table on the analyst. My bad.

325 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:04:44pm

re: #310 researchok

OK, change of pace…

I’m a behavioral analyst…you get one question.

I’ll go…

One thing that has always perplexed me is women with daddy issues, or abusive men issues. This seems to manifest in a variety of ways. Some women deal with this by sleeping around prolifically, or otherwise behaving in a wild manner in order to “hurt daddy”. Some seem to look for dominant males that will control them or belittle them, while others seem to look for men that will take care of them and tend to their every need, bend to their every whim. While others still seem to be hardcore manhaters which somehow cannot live without a man in their lives. And then there’s the kind who turn the pettiest of things into the ugliest, most hateful of fights, seemingly stopping at nothing to create a violent confrontation.

I guess if I could boil it all down into just one question, I would ask: What the fuck is this growth on the back of my neck?

326 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:04:56pm

re: #324 Rightwingconspirator

Hm. And mine. As in turning the table on the analyst. My bad.

LOL…

I just got that.

Beat at my own game….LOLOL

327 Political Atheist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:07:29pm

Lots 2 do 2morrow.
Great fun, gotta sleep. Play well!

328 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:10:45pm

re: #206 Dark_Falcon

THE ISLAMISTS ARE USING LAWFARE!! ANY LAWYER WHO REPRESENTS THEM IS A TRAITOR!!1 WE MUST PUT ANY SUCH LAWYER TO DEATH!!!1

/Pam “Shrieky” Geller

I was just thinking that would be a court case to eat popcorn at.

329 Dark_Falcon  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:11:36pm

re: #313 Dragon_Lady

Dude you REALLY, REALLY don’t want me askin you any of THOSE kind of questions! Honest, you don’t! Now I’m gonna log off and hit the sack. Night all!

re: #327 Rightwingconspirator

Lots 2 do 2morrow.
Great fun, gotta sleep. Play well!

Goodnight, you two.

Gonna log off myself. Have a good one, all.

330 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:12:48pm

re: #325 Slumbering Behemoth

I’ll go…

One thing that has always perplexed me is women with daddy issues, or abusive men issues. This seems to manifest in a variety of ways. Some women deal with this by sleeping around prolifically, or otherwise behaving in a wild manner in order to “hurt daddy”. Some seem to look for dominant males that will control them or belittle them, while others seem to look for men that will take care of them and tend to their every need, bend to their every whim. While others still seem to be hardcore manhaters which somehow cannot live without a man in their lives. And then there’s the kind who turn the pettiest of things into the ugliest, most hateful of fights, seemingly stopping at nothing to create a violent confrontation.

I guess if I could boil it all down into just one question, I would ask: What the fuck is this growth on the back of my neck?

Can’t speak to the back of your neck.

As to the women and behavior you described, there are no short answers.

Behavior is dictated by a series of experiences, not events. How we perceive experiences differ in each of us. That said, there are common behaviors because we all participate in the same culture and society.

A short answer: Women (and men) behave the way they do because of self esteem issues.

Now, before you roll your eyes, I’m not talking about the pop culture self esteem crap.

Real self esteem is very easy to understand and describe:

Knowing what you are and are not capable is real self esteem.

If you know who you are and what your potential and limitations are, you are in possession of self esteem. There are happy and unhappy lawyers and doctors and there are happy and unhappy mail clerks and janitors.

The behavior you describe is about people who are stuck- they do not know who they are and what they are capable of or what their limitations are.

They are lost and more often than not, they hang on to the past and refuse to move forward because they fear the unknown.

That’s teh short version. More if you want it.

331 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:13:30pm

re: #322 SanFranciscoZionist

Stay safe, SFZ. Please.

332 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:15:07pm

re: #330 researchok

Knowing what you are and are not capable and being happy in your own skin is real self esteem

333 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:15:15pm

re: #323 researchok

Welcome to the Casbah.

I pointed out that I am not a Foot Locker, but they won’t budge. Ah well, I get bagels and lox for breakfast.

I hope this is the last of this. This whole mess has been a mess.

334 djameswrites  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:15:34pm

re: #330 researchok

I’ll go…
what causes ‘fear of success’, that fear that keeps people from finishing things, submitting things, leaving novels at 75,000 words…

335 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:17:28pm

re: #330 researchok

Can’t speak to the back of your neck.

Feh. You’re fuckin’ useless. Guess I’ll go speak to an accountant or something.
/

That’s teh short version. More if you want it.

If you’re in a mood to type, I’m in a mood to read. Have at it, if you will.

336 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:17:48pm

re: #333 SanFranciscoZionist

I pointed out that I am not a Foot Locker, but they won’t budge. Ah well, I get bagels and lox for breakfast.

I hope this is the last of this. This whole mess has been a mess.

You know, I wish there was a way to make it simple.

There isn’t though….

OH! by the away, you’ll be very pleased- so guy on the thread about torture was giving you a hard time. I set his sorry ass straight and he apologized.

Go look- you’ll feel better.

Maybe you’ll buy me a car.
/

337 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:18:22pm

re: #335 Slumbering Behemoth

Feh. You’re fuckin’ useless. Guess I’ll go speak to an accountant or something.
/

If you’re in a mood to type, I’m in a mood to read. Have at it, if you will.

First things first- do you have any questions so far?

338 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:19:05pm

re: #331 Slumbering Behemoth

Stay safe, SFZ. Please.

Thanks SB—really, I’ll be fine. I’m sleeping at my folk’s place.
I’ll be sensible, but I think this round will be over quickly. I’ll check the news before heading out tomorrow.

339 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:20:04pm

re: #334 djameswrites

I’ll go…
what causes ‘fear of success’, that fear that keeps people from finishing things, submitting things, leaving novels at 75,000 words…

Fear of success does not exist.

It is actually a fear of failure, a fear of being found out- I’m not worthy, I am afraid people will find out who I really am, etc.

340 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:20:44pm

re: #336 researchok

You know, I wish there was a way to make it simple.

There isn’t though…

OH! by the away, you’ll be very pleased- so guy on the thread about torture was giving you a hard time. I set his sorry ass straight and he apologized.

Go look- you’ll feel better.

Maybe you’ll buy me a car.
/

Thank you for defending my honor, but I’m broke. Would you settle for a Matchbox?

;)

341 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:21:54pm

re: #340 SanFranciscoZionist

Thank you for defending my honor, but I’m broke. Would you settle for a Matchbox?

;)

Nope.

But next time I get to SF, you can give me directions to Joe’s Cable car burger joint.

342 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:23:01pm

re: #341 researchok

Nope.

But next time I get to SF, you can give me directions to Joe’s Cable car burger joint.

You got it.

343 djameswrites  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:23:13pm

re: #339 researchok

Along the same lines that a perfectionist will not start a project if he/she sees an imperfect ending?

344 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:23:22pm

Does Fox News coverage = GOP campaign contribution?
January 26, 2010 5:41 am ET by Eric Boehlert

With its open and aggressive cheerleading — not to mention on-air fundraising — for Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown last week, Fox News crossed yet another threshold in its unabashed transformation into a purely political entity. Now completely turning its back on producing any semblance of independent journalism, Fox News eagerly flaunts its role as GOP kingmaker.

That relentlessly partisan approach continues to raise fundamental questions about what role Fox News plays in our political culture and, thanks to its shameless GOP boosterism, whether the cable channel and its programming should fall under the jurisdiction of the Federal Election Commission. Meaning, does Fox News’ gung-ho GOP campaign coverage double as a contribution to the Republican Party, a contribution that should be regulated?

The Commission defines “contribution” to include any gift of money or “anything of value” made for the express purpose of influencing a federal election. A key Commission exemption for decades, though, has been granted to the news media, since they have been seen as “neutral” and not controlled by political interests. Therefore their editorial product could not be considered a “contribution” or “expenditure” to any campaign.

The exemption was created, in the words of the Commission, to ensure “the unfettered right of the newspapers, TV networks, and other media to cover and comment on political campaigns,” which makes perfect sense, since there’s nothing wrong with newspapers endorsing candidates or columnists berating incumbents. The exception has allowed journalists (and more recently bloggers) to report and pontificate about campaigns without having to worry about federal finance laws and whether their editorial efforts cross the line into candidate contributions.

That approach worked well because for decades there has been both a spoken and unspoken understanding among professional journalists as to what kind of guidelines and standards ought to be upheld in the pursuit of the news. That was especially true of cable and network news broadcasters, who wield so much influence in our TV-centric culture.

As former Federal Communications Commission chairman Reed Hundt once wrote:

Part of this tradition is that broadcasters do not show propaganda for any candidate, no matter how much a station owner may personally favor one or dislike the other. Broadcasters understand that they have a special and conditional role in public discourse… Virtually all broadcasters understand and honor it.

[…]

If you weren’t already aware, Fox News pretty much did all those things on behalf of Scott Brown.

The FEC made the correct, sensible decision in 2006 when it extended its media exemption to include bloggers, even though many of them broadcast a proud partisan voice online. There’s nothing wrong with a strong editorial voice. What Fox News is doing today, however, goes so far beyond broadcasting an editorial voice, skating so close to GOP campaign management, that it should no longer enjoy the distinction of a media exemption.

Indeed, with its radical transformation into a purely political entity, Fox News has changed the rules governing politics and the press. It’s time for the FEC to recognize that, look at Fox News with a fresh set of eyes, and act accordingly.

345 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:25:30pm

re: #343 djameswrites

Along the same lines that a perfectionist will not start a project if he/she sees an imperfect ending?

Yes, there is something referred to as the ‘Impostor Syndrome’.

‘How can I be a success? I’m not smart- I’m the same kid I was in high school/college’. I don’t belong in this nice neighborhood with these highfalutin’ types…’ etc.

It’s more common than you think.

346 Fozzie Bear  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:25:42pm

re: #33 Jadespring

Doesn’t most everyone say “NO EARMARKS!” at one time or another.
This particular phrase seems to on the list of programed ones that you hear when you pull that string with the plastic loop that’s stuck in their backs.

One of the most effective ways to reduce the size of the budget without actually reducing spending at all, is earmarks. Keep in mind, much of the earmarks go to pay for things that we used to budget directly. much of it is total crap.

Earmarks are like budget items, only with less oversight. Remember, however, if you eliminate earmarks, you have to raise on-the-books spending. Too much of the critical infrastructure is paid for with earmarks to not raise on-the-books spending if we cut earmarks.

People like to complain about earmarks, because it sounds good, but the fact is, they persist as such a prominent part of government expenditure precisely because we have done an incredibly shitty job as a nation of accepting the massive expense of running a country as large and technologically advanced as the US. It costs a shitload of money, people, and the alternative SUCKS.

347 djameswrites  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:29:03pm

re: #345 researchok

Cool, thanks.
re: #344 Gus 802

They should look at it, and set more stringent rules that all networks must follow. What Fox has done is crap all over the line that the rest of them have been ‘tongue in cheek’ skirting for years.
Fox is a great business model, for making money, but not so good at getting news to the public.

348 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:29:35pm

re: #344 Gus 802

The problem is if you single out one network you will invariably open up a Pandora’s box.

Are editorials ‘things of value’?

Is there a difference between news and entertainment as it relates to ‘value’?

Is there a difference between print and broadcast?

I think the whole approach is problematic.

349 Dancing along the light of day  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:30:07pm

Hiya Lizards!
Who is still awake here?
And buying gold?
///big time!

350 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:30:35pm

re: #348 researchok

The problem is if you single out one network you will invariably open up a Pandora’s box.

Are editorials ‘things of value’?

Is there a difference between news and entertainment as it relates to ‘value’?

Is there a difference between print and broadcast?

I think the whole approach is problematic.

The FEC routinely “singles out” individuals and groups. Fox News is not exception. They need to be investigated.

351 Dancing along the light of day  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:32:08pm

re: #322 SanFranciscoZionist

I’m in San Francisco tonight. Came over for dinner, and my folks won’t let me on BART to go home.

Probably safer to say there, for the night.
Daylight will expose the scum, and it’ll get cleaned up!
(((SFZ)))
Safety first!

352 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:32:31pm

re: #337 researchok

First things first- do you have any questions so far?

Sure. I get this part:

They are lost and more often than not, they hang on to the past and refuse to move forward…

I’ve had relationships with women who have had negative experiences that go as far back as their adolescence, and seem to engage in a kind of transference no matter how well they are treated now. One example might be me saying “Would you please treat me and my property with respect. You have no right to use me or my property as if you owned them”, the response being “What are you, my daddy now?”

What I don’t quite get is:

…because they fear the unknown.

Would this be a case of someone seeking the familiar? Someone who is so accustomed to conflict that they can’t live peacefully? Or is it a case of misplaced revenge?

353 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:33:30pm

re: #351 Floral Giraffe

Probably safer to say there, for the night.
Daylight will expose the scum, and it’ll get cleaned up!
(((SFZ)))
Safety first!

Hey, why is everyone so worried about me? Nothing is happening in the City. Eclectic Infidel is actually IN Oakland, folks!

354 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:34:15pm

I’m going to bed. I have doctor’s appts in the AM.

355 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:34:24pm

re: #350 Gus 802

The FEC routinely “singles out” individuals and groups. Fox News is not exception. They need to be investigated.

I don’t disagree- I rarely watch their hosts’ because it is a waste of time.

I just don’t want to see a war on journalism. That won’t end well.

I responded earlier to a comment you made that caught my attentionn.

See 140

356 Dancing along the light of day  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:34:30pm

re: #352 Slumbering Behemoth

Paging a Shrink on aisle 7.
Clean up on aisle 7!

(Seriously, it all depends on the person & their issues. The only resolution is communication!)

357 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:36:05pm

re: #338 SanFranciscoZionist

Phew!

re: #341 researchok

Go to Tommy’s Joynt. You won’t be disappointed.

/don’t let the long lines fool you, they move fast.

358 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:39:19pm

re: #353 SanFranciscoZionist

Hey, why is everyone so worried about me? Nothing is happening in the City. Eclectic Infidel is actually IN Oakland, folks!

I’m concerned for both y’all. Sue me.

359 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:39:50pm

re: #352 Slumbering Behemoth

Sure. I get this part:

I’ve had relationships with women who have had negative experiences that go as far back as their adolescence, and seem to engage in a kind of transference no matter how well they are treated now. One example might be me saying “Would you please treat me and my property with respect. You have no right to use me or my property as if you owned them”, the response being “What are you, my daddy now?”

What I don’t quite get is:

Would this be a case of someone seeking the familiar? Someone who is so accustomed to conflict that they can’t live peacefully? Or is it a case of misplaced revenge?

Conflict for some people is comfort, because it gives them an excuse not to get close.

You would think the closer you get, the less conflict there might be but usually, it is just the opposite. When someone knows their partner loves them and they trust their partner, they can engage in negative behavior feeling safe they won’t be abandoned. The conflict and knowing of their partners commitment to them actually empowers them.

These issues can be dealt with, though it can be a difficult process. By no means impossible, but it does require commitment.

360 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:40:51pm

Vote Against The Republicans: That’s (not) Bullshit

Sam Seder

Fox News and the right in a nutshell.

361 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:41:43pm

re: #356 Floral Giraffe

Paging a Shrink on aisle 7.
Clean up on aisle 7!

(Seriously, it all depends on the person & their issues. The only resolution is communication!)

Sorry FG, communication ceases to be an issue when you’re dodging high speed dinner ware because you had the audacity to point out that walking four feet to get an ashtray is better than simply ashing on the nearest magazine.

Yes, I have dated THAT BITCH.

362 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:41:46pm

re: #357 Slumbering Behemoth

Phew!

re: #341 researchok

Go to Tommy’s Joynt. You won’t be disappointed.

/don’t let the long lines fool you, they move fast.

Nice menu.

I can stay for a week. Or two.

363 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:42:30pm

re: #356 Floral Giraffe

Paging a Shrink on aisle 7.
Clean up on aisle 7!

(Seriously, it all depends on the person & their issues. The only resolution is communication!)

Hey! I resemble that remark!

364 Dancing along the light of day  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:42:53pm

re: #353 SanFranciscoZionist

Hey, why is everyone so worried about me? Nothing is happening in the City. Eclectic Infidel is actually IN Oakland, folks!

Because I like you.
And want to see you safe.
And NOT have you in the middle of another “Rodney King” thingy.
Yes you’re SF.
And Oakland is the place you don’t want to be.
But, I’m late to the thread & jumped in!
Will chill now.

365 Dancing along the light of day  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:45:29pm

re: #361 Slumbering Behemoth

You can make better choices than that.
You are worth better than that.
But, it’s work…

366 3eff Jeff  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:45:56pm

re: #353 SanFranciscoZionist

Hey, why is everyone so worried about me? Nothing is happening in the City. Eclectic Infidel is actually IN Oakland, folks!

I’m actually within easy walking distance of where the corralled the protesters. But I stayed in tonight, and there hasn’t been any out of the ordinary activity around my building.

Good night, and hopefully things are clear in the morning.

367 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:51:12pm

re: #359 researchok

I believe I get what you’re saying, but I just don’t have the energy to put up with that kind of bullshit. I’ve been wronged in the past, but I choose to leave those things where they belong; in the past.

Anyhow, another question if I may. What would compel someone, who has treated you with such hatred and contempt, to pursue you after such a dysfunctional relationship has been dissolved? Even after the course of a few years. Psycho?

368 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:55:45pm

re: #362 researchok

Nice menu.

I can stay for a week. Or two.

I make a lot of jokes (subjective), and horse around a lot, but I don’t fuck around when it comes to food. That ain’t exactly a burger joint, but the price is right and the quality and quantity are nothing to sneeze at.

At least it was so, last time I was there. ‘Bout three years ago or so.

369 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:56:32pm

re: #367 Slumbering Behemoth

I believe I get what you’re saying, but I just don’t have the energy to put up with that kind of bullshit. I’ve been wronged in the past, but I choose to leave those things where they belong; in the past.

Anyhow, another question if I may. What would compel someone, who has treated you with such hatred and contempt, to pursue you after such a dysfunctional relationship has been dissolved? Even after the course of a few years. Psycho?

Safety. She knows you’ll be there, like I said.

There is notion that the person who cares least about the relationship controls the relationship.

If she believes you will hit road, she’ll panic- and resent you for taking control of the relationship.

I do want to make clear that I am giving you my impressions only, based on what you are telling me. I am by no means offering up definitive advice or counsel. That can’t be done from a distance.

If you want to pick this up, write me at my nic at gmail.

370 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:56:54pm
371 researchok  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:58:02pm

I’m off. 2 AM here.

Manana folks.

372 Dancing along the light of day  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:58:30pm

re: #369 researchok

It’s complicated.
Is my favorite relationship description EVER!

373 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:58:44pm

Jesus Kicked Your Butt

BillyBobNeck

Note: This is a parody. Accurate I might add.

374 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 10:59:39pm

re: #365 Floral Giraffe

Aw, dear FG, I ain’t hating on me. Not even hating on THAT BITCH, really. It was what it was. The sex was spectacular, though. The definitely played a part in us draggin’ it out far longer than either of us should have.

375 Dancing along the light of day  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 11:01:36pm

re: #330 researchok

Your posts are very spot on!
Glad to read them.

G’night all.

376 JamesWI  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 11:03:35pm

re: #350 Gus 802

The FEC routinely “singles out” individuals and groups. Fox News is not exception. They need to be investigated.

Except that at this point, an investigation like that would be exactly what Fox would want. They’d have the ‘Oh my god, the liberal fascists are trying to silence us” storyline they dream of, and the right-wing craziness would get even worse. Even the most massive fines probably wouldn’t hurt them, because their mindless viewers would probably start up massive donation campaigns to pay for them.

All that would come of it would be increased craziness, and increased ratings, and massive backlash against Obama and the Dems. Right now, those pricks are untouchable.

377 Dancing along the light of day  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 11:04:25pm

re: #374 Slumbering Behemoth

Never meant to imply you was hating on anyone.
It’s complicated & we all have to WORK to make it work.
Hope you can find your way to happy.
I’ve got the happy part, but not the partner part.
We are all doing the best that we can.
I really believe that.

378 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 11:06:29pm

re: #369 researchok

I do want to make clear that I am giving you my impressions only, based on what you are telling me. I am by no means offering up definitive advice or counsel. That can’t be done from a distance.

We’re just talkin’ like drinking buddies. I ain’t looking for therapy here, just curious about your take on things long past. I’ve long since made my peace with such things.

379 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 11:07:10pm

George Bush Thinks Sarah Palin Is ‘Unqualified,’ Lost Election For McCain, Says GOP Source

George W. Bush is not a fan of Sarah Palin and thinks that she spoiled the GOP’s best laid plans in 2008 and could potentially do it again, a friend of the former president recently said.

The New York Daily News reported Friday:

“Naming Palin makes Bush think less of McCain as a man,” a Republican official familiar with Bush’s thinking told the Daily News.

“He thinks McCain ran a lousy campaign with an unqualified running mate and destroyed any chance of winning by picking Palin.”

Bush has addressed Palin as a relative non-factor before, characterizing her as a grossly unpolished candidate not ready for the political spotlight.

From a book released last year, former Bush staffer Matt Latimer wrote:

“‘I’m trying to remember if I’ve met her before. I’m sure I must have.’ [Bush’s] eyes twinkled, then he asked, ‘What is she, the governor of Guam?’”

“This woman is being put into a position she is not even remotely prepared for. She hasn’t spent one day on the national level. Neither has her family. Let’s wait and see how she looks five days out.”

380 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 11:09:11pm

re: #377 Floral Giraffe

Never meant to imply you was hating on anyone.

I didn’t get the impression you were, I just wanted to put that out there.

I’ve got the happy part, but not the partner part.

High five, FG, high five!

381 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 11:16:59pm
382 Gus  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 11:18:36pm

re: #381 Slumbering Behemoth

God will fuck you up.

I noz! I iz gonna burn up in imaginary place with fire for eturnity!

/

383 elbruce  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 11:19:44pm

Say, what?

384 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 11:22:43pm

re: #382 Gus 802

You have not chance of salvation make your time.

385 Dancing along the light of day  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 11:29:11pm

re: #383 elbruce

What’s up?
Glad to “see” you back posting here.

386 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Nov 5, 2010 11:41:14pm

re: #371 researchok

Fun discussion all around. Interesting, anyway.

Safety. She knows you’ll be there, like I said.

She chose… poorly.

387 Gus  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 2:14:30am

You going to say something Ogami Itto or are you just going to randomly down ding everything you see?

388 Gus  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 2:14:41am

Ogami Itto

Karma: 9
Registered since: Sep 4, 2010 at 10:54 am
(Logged in)

No. of comments posted: 4
No. of links posted: 0
Recent comments

389 nhand42  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 5:24:52am

re: #315 djameswrites


125 to 16, but of course there is no institutional bias.

The majority of scientists are left-leaning, but that doesn’t mean science has an institutional bias. You are confusing “journalists” with “journalism”.

390 JeffFX  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 5:59:16am

re: #388 Gus 802

Ogami Itto

Karma: 9
Registered since: Sep 4, 2010 at 10:54 am
(Logged in)

No. of comments posted: 4
No. of links posted: 0
Recent comments

This would not happen if there was a min post limit to enable the comment +/- like on Charles’ blog posts.

391 Romantic Heretic  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 6:10:07am

re: #21 Rightwingconspirator

Business contracts should leave participation in the process unhindered.

re: #381 Slumbering Behemoth

God will fuck you up.

That made me smile.

392 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 8:27:56am

Is Maddow in 6th grade? I don’t remember my kids trying the “yeah, but I’m not as bad as Joey” argument once they reached junior high.

Maybe she thinks her audience has never raised teenagers.

393 Political Atheist  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 8:44:47am

re: #392 MurphysMom

All those pundits get weird. Waste of time to follow them.

394 Lidane  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:00:42am

re: #392 MurphysMom

Or maybe you missed her point entirely.

395 Wozza Matter?  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:16:06am

re: #394 Lidane

I’m guessing so.

One host donates to three candidates and does not (as far as i know) openly advocate supporting them live on air……………….

the other is an entire network where many of their programme hosts donate to, campaign for and fundraise for on television and off.

Doesn’t seem too similar to me………..

396 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:17:34am

re: #394 Lidane

Don’t think so. Even Charles agrees, “She’s making a much larger point with her comparisons to Fox News — and that’s how utterly out of control Fox’s GOP cheerleading has become.”

Same thing my kids used to try when they got in trouble, “yeah, but Joey’s shoplifting now - he’s way out of control.” Hoping I’d be distracted by contemplating the neighbor kid’s wrong-doing. Didn’t work then, doesn’t work now.

397 Charles Johnson  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:21:25am

re: #396 MurphysMom

That’s ridiculous. Did you even watch the video? She says very clearly that Olbermann violated his contract and does NOT defend him at all. Not one bit.

She’s not “distracting” from anything. Why are right wingers so determined to promote obviously false memes?

398 Wozza Matter?  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:22:48am

re: #22 EmmmieG

Oh, wait, I forgot to update you all on the breath-taking race for at-large soil & water district person in Washington County, Oregon.

It turns out you had to a. be registered 14 days in advance c. own land in the county AND receive at least one vote.

Nobody did.

So they’ll fill the position with an appointment.

Democracy has been thwarted! To arms!

i can sleep easier now nowing the issue has been resolved xx

399 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:26:10am

re: #397 Charles

Then why mention Fox News at all. There’s a time and place for bringing up the wrong-doing of others, and it’s not in the middle of your own controversy.

400 Lidane  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:27:30am

re: #396 MurphysMom

Yep. You definitely missed the point being made. This post of yours proves it.

401 Charles Johnson  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:28:42am

re: #399 MurphysMom

Then why mention Fox News at all. There’s a time and place for bringing up the wrong-doing of others, and it’s not in the middle of your own controversy.

Oh please.

Now I know you didn’t watch it. Or if you did, you were watching through right wing goggles.

402 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:30:06am

re: #400 Lidane

Did either of you read my first post? The typical 6th grade argument was always “Yeah, but”. Just as Maddow is acknowledging the wrong-doing, but …

403 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:31:59am

re: #401 Charles

Or, it’s possible that I watched it and came away with a different opinion.

404 Charles Johnson  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:32:04am

re: #402 MurphysMom

Did either of you read my first post? The typical 6th grade argument was always “Yeah, but”. Just as Maddow is acknowledging the wrong-doing, but …

I read your post, and it’s a ridiculous mischaracterization of what Maddow said.

405 Charles Johnson  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:32:26am

re: #403 MurphysMom

Or, it’s possible that I watched it and came away with a different opinion.

Right — an opinion that isn’t based on anything close to reality.

406 Wozza Matter?  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:32:36am

re: #402 MurphysMom

Did either of you read my first post? The typical 6th grade argument was always “Yeah, but”. Just as Maddow is acknowledging the wrong-doing, but …

If incident A was vaguely comparable to incident B then yes- it would be he said/she said as bad as each other.

Howevere Rachel is saying that Keith was suspended from MSNBC because of their ethics policy and that FNC doesn’t have an ethics policy or they wouldn’t have any hosts……………..

chalk and cheese.

407 Charles Johnson  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:33:40am

Maddow is right, by the way — Fox News apparently has NO ethics policy. Or if they do, it isn’t posted anywhere on the Internet where people can check the behavior of Fox’s propagandists against it.

408 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:34:41am

re: #404 Charles

I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree. I’m sorry you felt it necessary to ridicule my opinion by calling it a ridiculous mischaracterization, though.

409 Lidane  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:35:25am

re: #399 MurphysMom

Then why mention Fox News at all..

Because she’s pointing out the obvious— that Fox isn’t a news organization at all. It’s a political organization. MSNBC, on the other hand, IS a news organization, so the rules that Fox lives by, where they’re blatantly donating to candidates and going to fundraisers and raising money live on the air for Republicans running for office, wouldn’t fly at MSNBC because their rules are different.

Keith’s sin, BTW, wasn’t in donating to political candidates. He’s never pretended to be objective politically, and anyone who’s seen even five minutes of his show knows it. Keith’s sin was in not clearing his donations first, as per his contract. He was an idiot for that, since he knew the terms of the deal.

410 Wozza Matter?  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:37:42am

re: #409 Lidane

Because she’s pointing out the obvious— that Fox isn’t a news organization at all. It’s a political organization. MSNBC, on the other hand, IS a news organization, so the rules that Fox lives by, where they’re blatantly donating to candidates and going to fundraisers and raising money live on the air for Republicans running for office, wouldn’t fly at MSNBC because their rules are different.

Keith’s sin, BTW, wasn’t in donating to political candidates. He’s never pretended to be objective politically, and anyone who’s seen even five minutes of his show knows it. Keith’s sin was in not clearing his donations first, as per his contract. He was an idiot for that, since he knew the terms of the deal.

exactly - all Keith has to do is sign on with fox news to avoid this happneing in the future………….. (wait, what?)

/

411 Lidane  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:38:18am

re: #408 MurphysMom

It’s not ridicule if you really are misrepresenting what she said.

412 Charles Johnson  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:42:07am

re: #408 MurphysMom

I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree. I’m sorry you felt it necessary to ridicule my opinion by calling it a ridiculous mischaracterization, though.

How did I know that would be the next response?

You can’t defend what you wrote, because it’s a blatant, obvious mischaracterization, so instead you’ll start in with the victimhood stuff.

I’ve only seen this about 26,723 times before.

413 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:46:08am

re: #411 Lidane

Yeah, name-calling without explanation is ridicule.

Wait, is Joey your kid? :)

414 Charles Johnson  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:48:46am

re: #413 MurphysMom

Yeah, name-calling without explanation is ridicule.

But of course, comparing Rachel Maddow to a 6th grader is carefully reasoned and not ridicule at all.

When you post a ridiculous, distorted mischaracterization, you’re going to get called on it. You’re not helping your case by whining about it and trying to pretend you’re being mistreated.

415 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:52:25am

re: #412 Charles

I’ve already defended what I wrote. I see Maddow’s comments as a juvenile distraction, otherwise there would be no need at all to bring Fox News or anyone else, for that matter, into the discussion. You disagree. I could state it again, and you could disagree again if you’d like, and we could go on all day.

416 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:55:31am

re: #414 Charles

Maddow’s a public figure. I’m not.

It’s your blog. I’ll grow a tougher skin.

417 Charles Johnson  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:56:44am

re: #415 MurphysMom

I’ve already defended what I wrote. I see Maddow’s comments as a juvenile distraction, otherwise there would be no need at all to bring Fox News or anyone else, for that matter, into the discussion. You disagree. I could state it again, and you could disagree again if you’d like, and we could go on all day.

I understand that you have a really obvious bias, and it’s clouding your judgment and making you see things that aren’t there.

418 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 9:57:18am

re: #417 Charles

And I feel the same about you. :)

419 Charles Johnson  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:00:02am

re: #418 MurphysMom

And I feel the same about you. :)

So go ahead and explain to me what I’m seeing that isn’t there. You made ridiculous right wing claims that Maddow was making excuses for Olbermann — and she simply is not. Not at all. She admits right up front that he violated his contract.

And yet, you still insist that she did make excuses. I shouldn’t be surprised any more by this kind of stuff, I guess. It’s how right wingers argue: ignore reality and just cling to those talking points like a drowning man with a life preserver.

420 Lidane  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:05:19am

re: #413 MurphysMom

But of course, comparing a real-life Ph.D. like Rachel Maddow to a 6th grader isn’t ridicule at all. It’s just reasonable discourse, right?

Look— just admit that you didn’t understand the point she was making about how Keith’s suspension shows the difference between a news organization like MSNBC (or CNN, who have similar rules in place) and a blatantly political one like Fox News. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong, or when you didn’t catch what she was saying. Really.

421 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:10:58am

re: #419 Charles

No, I did NOT claim that she was making excuses. Surely your dealings with children have left you with the ability to differentiate between excusing and distracting. An excuse is - here’s my reason for … Distracting is - look over there at Joey!

As I said in my first post, she said Yeah, but look at Fox News, they’re way worse. In my opinion, that’s an attempt to distract people, to change the subject to the wrong-doings of others. It’s typical behavior for children, maybe Maddow’s parents never caught on.

422 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:15:10am

re: #420 Lidane

Why bring it up at all, except to try to burnish their reputation by distracting viewers with what she believes is the wrong-doing of others. There’s a time and a place for pointing out the misdeeds of Fox News. If you believe that it’s in the middle of your own mini-scandal, then you would have 11-year-olds walk all over you.

423 Charles Johnson  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:18:31am

re: #421 MurphysMom

As I said in my first post, she said Yeah, but look at Fox News, they’re way worse.

And just like your first post, this is a ridiculous, blatant mischaracterization.

Your attempt to drag it down to the level of a 6th grade argument is pathetic. She made a very good point, supported by a mountain of evidence, that Fox News actually does engage in exactly the kind of behavior that is prohibited at MSNBC.

That’s the point you don’t want people to see, and that’s why you’re trying to minimize and mock it.

424 rwmofo  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:19:34am

re: #420 Lidane

But of course, comparing a real-life Ph.D. like Rachel Maddow to a 6th grader isn’t ridicule at all. It’s just reasonable discourse, right?

Look— just admit that you didn’t understand the point she was making about how Keith’s suspension shows the difference between a news organization like MSNBC (or CNN, who have similar rules in place) and a blatantly political one like Fox News. It’s okay to admit when you’re wrong, or when you didn’t catch what she was saying. Really.

Heh.

425 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:22:06am

re: #423 Charles

Yeah, and my kids had definitive proof that Joey shoplifted. Point is, they were trying to minimize my anger with them by bringing it up when they did. Same as Maddow.

426 Charles Johnson  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:24:05am

re: #425 MurphysMom

Yeah, and my kids had definitive proof that Joey shoplifted. Point is, they were trying to minimize my anger with them by bringing it up when they did. Same as Maddow.

Right, I understand that’s what you’re saying. But calling it a “point” is an exaggeration. It’s a deliberate distortion.

427 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:27:00am

re: #426 Charles

And I think it’s not. Seems neither of us will change the others’ mind, so I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree.

428 jaunte  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:29:24am

re: #427 MurphysMom

Do you think broadcast news organizations should have ethics policies for their employees? If one company does, and one company does not, is that not part of the larger story when the employee of the organization which does have an ethics policy violates that policy?

429 Charles Johnson  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:30:39am

re: #427 MurphysMom

And I think it’s not. Seems neither of us will change the others’ mind, so I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree.

The difference is that your opinion is based on a fantasy version of a Rachel Maddow show that never existed. She doesn’t distract, she doesn’t make excuses, she doesn’t minimize. Anyone can watch and see for themselves that she began with a very clear summation of what happened, acknowledged that Olbermann had violated his contract and that other MSNBC reporters had followed theirs, and basically said he deserved it. No excuses, no distractions. It was clear as day.

Then she proceeded to illustrate, with numerous examples and hard facts, that Fox News has no such ethical standard.

The “facts” part is what you seem to be desperately trying to ignore.

430 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:35:04am

re: #428 jaunte

I think all employers should have ethics policies for their employees. I would feel more comfortable with the “look at how bad Fox News is” argument had it been made by CNN or ABC, rather than by Olbermann’s co-worker.

431 jaunte  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:39:09am

re: #430 MurphysMom

CNN did report on Fox’s contributions:

“‘Fair and Balanced’ has been rendered utterly meaningless,” Hari Sevugan, the DNC’s national press secretary, said in a statement. “Any pretense that may have existed about the ties between Fox News and the Republican Party has been ripped violently away.

“No Republican who appears on Fox can be seen as answering to an independent press and all should appear with a disclaimer for who they truly are – the favored candidate of the corporate-friendly network. No Fox News political coverage can be seen as impartial and all of it should have a disclaimer for what it truly is – partisan propaganda.”

News Corporation spokesman Jack Horner defended the donation.

“News Corporation believes in the power of free markets, and the RGA’s pro-business agenda supports our priorities at this most critical time for our economy,” Horner said in a statement to CNN.
politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com

432 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:42:04am

re: #431 jaunte

Ahh. Then there was really no point in Maddow bringing it up. They were fairly defended by CNN.

433 jaunte  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:43:45am

re: #432 MurphysMom

We can all go back to sleep now.

434 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:44:32am

re: #432 MurphysMom

Defended?

435 Varek Raith  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:48:09am

re: #424 rwmofo

Heh.

Funny, isn’t it?
Funny that MSNBC has higher ethics than FoxNews with regards to political contributions.

436 Gus  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:48:10am

The Pledge of Allegiance - Spanish

Yo prometo lealtad a la bandera
de los estados Unidos de America,
y a la Republica que representa,
una Nacion bajo Dios,
entera,
con libertad y justicia para todos.

Now we all know this kook wouldn’t have made an issue if it was in German or French class.

437 Gus  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:48:33am

re: #436 Gus 802

Oops. Wrong thread.

438 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:49:18am

re: #429 Charles

“Then she proceeded to illustrate, with numerous examples and hard facts, that Fox News has no such ethical standard.” In an attempt to mitigate the damage to MSNBC’s reputation. And that’s what you seem to be desperately trying to ignore.

439 Varek Raith  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:50:17am

re: #438 MurphysMom

“Then she proceeded to illustrate, with numerous examples and hard facts, that Fox News has no such ethical standard.” In an attempt to mitigate the damage to MSNBC’s reputation. And that’s what you seem to be desperately trying to ignore.

Or!
You’re just trying to mitigate the damage done to FoxNews.
Hmmm.
;)

440 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:50:53am

re: #434 Obdicut

Eh. Maybe I should have worded it, “Fox was chastised by CNN”.

441 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:51:00am

re: #438 MurphysMom

In a successful attempt to point out that, if one is going to condemn Olbermann, they should much more condemn Fox.

That is not a ‘mitigation’ of MSNBC. It is pointing out that, comparatively, Fox is worse.

If you are punishing one of your children for lying, and he points out that your other child lies constantly in worse ways but you do not punish him for those worse lies, that is a fair point.

Do you understand?

442 Varek Raith  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:53:16am

Of course, if FoxNews had a similar policy to MSNBCs, Fox would have almost no hosts.
Lol.

443 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:54:14am

re: #441 Obdicut

“f you are punishing one of your children for lying, and he points out that your other child lies constantly in worse ways but you do not punish him for those worse lies, that is a fair point.”

It’s a fair point, but one that’s not best made while he’s being punished.

444 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:58:27am

re: #443 MurphysMom

I’m glad that you acknowledge that it’s a fair point. Given that Maddow in no way acted wrongly herself, at all, in the least, it is more akin to an uninvolved daughter pointing out to you that you are punishing one of your sons for something you never punish the other one for.

Does that help even more to clear up why your attacks on Maddow are rather off the mark? She did nothing wrong. She is not shifting blame away from herself in any way, because she has no share of blame.

445 Charles Johnson  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 10:59:40am

re: #444 Obdicut

Does that help even more to clear up why your attacks on Maddow are rather off the mark?

I’m guessing not.

446 LotharBot  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 11:11:25am

Maddow makes a good point, but does she really need to take almost seven minutes to do it? Ugh, old media FTL.

447 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 11:11:33am

re: #444 Obdicut

I’m guessing your kids got away with a lot. :)

This situation is not like an uninvolved daughter stepping into the middle of a sibling’s punishment. It’s more like the daughter’s trying to save her family’s reputation to the outside world when her brother is caught doing something wrong. She’s trying to save the family’s reputation by pointing out that her neighbors have no standards at all.

448 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 11:16:21am

re: #447 MurphysMom

I’m guessing your kids got away with a lot. :)

Speculating on other people’s capabilities as a parent is a really rude thing to do. Please don’t do it.


This situation is not like an uninvolved daughter stepping into the middle of a sibling’s punishment. It’s more like the daughter’s trying to save her family’s reputation to the outside world when her brother is caught doing something wrong. She’s trying to save the family’s reputation by pointing out that her neighbors have no standards at all.

Okay, you don’t like your own analogy. That isn’t my problem.

It is much more like a woman who who hosts a news show, who herself has not acted in any improper way, pointing out that, although one of her fellow hosts at her channel has committed an error, that this is actually a rarity at her channel— as shown by her own ethical standards— and that another channel doesn’t even have ethical standards, let alone adheres to them.

For some reason, it really, really bothers you that Maddow is pointing out that Fox lacks ethics and professionalism, despite the fact that she herself is in no way accused of not behaving with ethics and professionalism.

I have no idea why.

449 MPH  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 11:25:54am

Hannity and Olberman are both pathetic. Maddow just us who the left wingnuts are (see cover of John Avlon’s book) amazon.com

450 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 11:31:40am

re: #448 Obdicut

“Speculating on other people’s capabilities as a parent is a really rude thing to do. Please don’t do it.” I am sorry. I intended to tease, not cause offense.

The sibling story was your analogy. In mine, Joey was always the neighbor kid. I’ve tried explaining this several times, so it seems that we, too will have to agree to disagree.

I have cookies to decorate and the afternoon is getting away from me.

451 allegro  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 11:31:44am

re: #449 MPH

Huh?

452 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 11:33:21am

re: #450 MurphysMom

The sibling story was your analogy. In mine, Joey was always the neighbor kid. I’ve tried explaining this several times, so it seems that we, too will have to agree to disagree.

Okay, well, your analogy was completely flawed to begin with, then, because you don’t stand in loco parentis to MSNBC and not to Fox. Fox and MSNBC hold the same relationship to you. So you simply made a very poor analogy to defend your very strange desire to castigate Maddow for pointing out that Fox news is far more ethically flawed than MSNBC or Olberman.

453 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 11:44:07am

Pulling the partisan glasses off and simply looking at the clip, as is, it’s as plain as the nose on your face.

MSNBC has a set of ethics standards regarding campaign contributions that they enforce. Fox News Channel does not. That was Maddow’s point.

454 LRonHoover  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 12:13:19pm

I don’t really buy her argument. Suspending Keith is not proof that MSNBC is really just a straight up news operation, unlike FOXNews. The real proof is the actual news coverage they give. When I watch either of the two networks the coverage is very similar. The primetime on both of the channels is pretty unwatchable for me.

We all know Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, Chirs Mathews, and Lawrence Odonnell are liberal, and want to see Democrats win elections, and the way they cover the news reflects that desire. Just because they have this rule about donations doesn’t really change that.

What I find myself thinking about is this: if a cable news host runs a story or segment that is designed to help one party and hurt the other, should they disclose that to us? Or is that obvious? Do you think they run segments like that? And essentially isn’t that the same thing as donating money?

455 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 12:21:15pm

re: #454 LRonHoover

I don’t really buy her argument. Suspending Keith is not proof that MSNBC is really just a straight up news operation, unlike FOXNews.

Do you understand that that wasn’t her argument?

456 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 12:24:24pm

re: #454 LRonHoover

if a cable news host runs a story or segment that is designed to help one party and hurt the other, should they disclose that to us? Or is that obvious?

In the case of FNC, it is so in your face obvious, so 24/7 blatant, that you’d have to be three months into the grave not to see it.

457 LRonHoover  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 12:40:44pm

re: #455 Obdicut

starting at ~ 6:14

”..but we are not a political operation. Fox is. We are a news operation, and the rules around here are part of how you know that.”

458 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 12:43:41pm

re: #457 LRonHoover

QED.

459 allegro  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 12:43:45pm

re: #457 LRonHoover

”..but we are not a political operation. Fox is. We are a news operation, and the rules around here are part of how you know that.”

It’s the difference between news with a political perspective and propaganda and lies.

460 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 12:49:42pm

re: #457 LRonHoover

starting at ~ 6:14

”..but we are not a political operation. Fox is. We are a news operation, and the rules around here are part of how you know that.”

Do you understand that her argument is not that suspending Olberman doesn’t demonstrate this, but that rather the entire way that Fox News acts demonstrates that Fox news is, indeed, a political operation?

461 LRonHoover  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 1:01:25pm

re: #460 Obdicut

She had two arguments, one that Fox News is a political operation, second was that MSNBC is not. That’s why she said “We are a news operation, and the rules around here are part of how you know that.” And that’s what I’m disagreeing with, not the former.

462 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 1:06:48pm

re: #461 LRonHoover

She had two arguments, one that Fox News is a political operation, second was that MSNBC is not. That’s why she said “We are a news operation, and the rules around here are part of how you know that.” And that’s what I’m disagreeing with, not the former.

Why do you think that MSNBC is a political organization? Because they have the Republican Joe Scarborough in the mornings?

463 LRonHoover  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 1:23:58pm

re: #462 Obdicut

Everytime I watch any of their prime time news lineup of Ed Shultz, Chris Mathews, Keith Olbermann, or Rachel Maddow the goal of these shows seems to be designed to benefit democrats and harm republicans. I see Fox as same, but you know, the other way around ;)

In short cable news really sucks.

464 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 1:29:24pm

re: #463 LRonHoover

Why did you simply dodge the fact of Joe Scarborough on MSNBC?

Do you think that the amount of factual programming on each station is the same?

Maddow, for example, is exemplary for the accuracy of her reporting. Don’t you see that as rather different than, say, Fox?

465 LRonHoover  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 1:58:56pm

re: #464 Obdicut

I was telling why I see MSNBC as largely political in motivation, if you want to site Scarborough as evidence that they are not as political as Fox that’s fine. To me, MSNBC is still closer to what Fox is than it is to being a news organization, it all seems like the talk radio format moved to cable news channels. I’m not sure who is more accurate, all I know is they are both really bad to watch.

We don’t need “News for Liberals” or “News for Conservatives” we just need better news.

466 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 2:10:21pm

re: #465 LRonHoover

I was telling why I see MSNBC as largely political in motivation, if you want to site Scarborough as evidence that they are not as political as Fox that’s fine.

You rather missed the point of that. MSNBC, which you are claiming is “news for liberals”, has Joe Scarborough, Republican congressman, for three hours in the morning.

To me, MSNBC is still closer to what Fox is than it is to being a news organization, it all seems like the talk radio format moved to cable news channels. I’m not sure who is more accurate, all I know is they are both really bad to watch.

Isn’t who is more accurate a rather important question when determining which one is the better news service? Do you have anything to back up your opinion at all?

We don’t need “News for Liberals” or “News for Conservatives” we just need better news.

That’s nice. But one of the very important points is, say, the comparison between Beck and Maddow.

Beck spouts insane conspiracy theories, lies a lot, and race-baits.

Maddow reports accurately and invites people to defend their positions.

That you are attempting to equate them is rather foolish of you.

467 LRonHoover  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 3:56:46pm

re: #466 Obdicut

Please read what I’m saying before you misinterpret it and then argue against a misrepresentation. Let me quote myself:

“When I watch either of the two networks the coverage is very similar

You even quoted this

“I was telling why I see MSNBC as largely political in motivation”

“Everytime I watch any of their prime time news lineup of Ed Shultz, Chris Mathews, Keith Olbermann, or Rachel Maddow the goal of these shows seems to be designed to benefit democrats and harm republicans. I see Fox as same, but you know, the other way around ;)”

I’m not equating them in every way, but I am saying that they are the same in that these shows, which are the shows that the majority of people watch, are politically motivated and designed to achieve political goals.

Do you disagree that the shows of Ed Shultz, Chris Mathews, Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, and Lawerence Odonnell are intended to benefit Democrats and harm Republicans?

So if the most important shows on the network are intended to benefit Democrats and harm Republicans, then they are largely a political operation.

I’m not arguing who is more accurate, I agree that MSNBC is probably more accurate than FOX.

468 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 6:04:41pm

re: #459 allegro

It’s the difference between news with a political perspective and propaganda and lies.

This is it right here

Nobody disputes MSNBC leans politically left for America, but the difference is they’re not craven scumbags all over the place, whereas Fox actually is staffed by craven scumbags

Find me anyone on MSNBC who has advocated allowing parts of San Francisco (or any part of America) to be blown up because of political reasons.

469 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 6:05:24pm

re: #447 MurphysMom

I’m guessing your kids got away with a lot. :)

This situation is not like an uninvolved daughter stepping into the middle of a sibling’s punishment. It’s more like the daughter’s trying to save her family’s reputation to the outside world when her brother is caught doing something wrong. She’s trying to save the family’s reputation by pointing out that her neighbors have no standards at all.

Wow, you’re a nasty person

470 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 6:18:30pm

re: #469 WindUpBird

I apologized to Obdicut, but apparently teasing about parenting styles is a sore spot for you too.

I was chastised earlier for taking a comment personally. Apparently, only conservatives are required to toughen up around here.

471 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 6:31:10pm

re: #470 MurphysMom

Playing the victim card isn’t really going to garner you any sympathy.

472 Lidane  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 6:42:15pm

re: #470 MurphysMom

Apparently, only conservatives are required to toughen up around here.

Oh, boo hoo. CRY MOAR. Then put on your big girl panties and deal with it.

Ask some of the longtime liberal posters who’ve been around since the site was much farther to the right than it is now if it’s only conservatives that have to “toughen up” around here. Everyone here is called on the carpet if they go over the line, regardless of political slant.

473 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 6:42:39pm

re: #471 Obdicut

No victim card. Just stating the facts as I see them. I toughen up and use kid gloves with you. Got it.

474 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 6:47:04pm

re: #472 Lidane

Oh for heaven’s sake! Over the line? I teased him, assuming that his parenting skills were fine and he would see it as the joke it was. Obviously, this was a sore spot. So I apologized.

475 Gus  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 6:50:53pm

Noobs trolling a dead thread. Classic.

476 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 7:41:32pm

re: #474 MurphysMom

Man, and you just can’t stop. “Obviously, this was a sore spot.”

Just try not taking potshots at others while you post here, please.

477 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 7:45:58pm

re: #476 Obdicut

Playing the victim card isn’t really going to garner you any sympathy.

478 Gus  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 7:48:50pm

re: #477 MurphysMom

Playing the victim card isn’t really going to garner you any sympathy.

Troll.

479 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 7:49:48pm

re: #477 MurphysMom

I’m not a victim in the least. I’m not even a goddamn parent, so your attempts to snipe at my parenting skills are just ludicrous and mean-spirited.

Honestly, I don’t get people like you. What’s the point of saying crap like “Obviously, this was a sore point.” What do you gain from trying to put others down?

480 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 8:04:44pm

re: #479 Obdicut

*kid gloves back on* I am sorry for upsetting you, and for making any assumptions about your personal life. I did not intend to be mean-spirited, but it’s come across that way. I’ll try to be more considerate of your feelings and those of others.

481 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 8:09:15pm

re: #480 MurphysMom

Not being a jerk isn’t putting kid gloves on. It’s just not being a jerk.

Can you explain how ‘Obviously, it’s a sore point’ wasn’t intended in a mean-spirited way?

482 MurphysMom  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 8:24:19pm

re: #481 Obdicut

I intended it as a statement of the obvious, but it has upset you a great deal. Again, I apologize and offer my sincere intention to try to avoid offending you further. Beyond that, I’m not sure what I can do.

483 ClaudeMonet  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 11:21:34pm

re: #99 elbruce

It’s worth mentioning that since the Citizens United SCOTUS case, donating to a political cause is quite clearly a constitutionally protected right for both persons and corporate entities.

It is not legal for an employment contract to require you to give up your constitutional rights. If it were, then indentured servitude would be currently legal. Which it is not.

Olbermann might have an actionable lawsuit on this unless he gets his show back pronto. And don’t think he isn’t the kind of guy who wouldn’t go for suing MSNBC if it came down to it.

Noon: Olbermann gets his show back.
Noon plus five seconds: MSNBC cancels Olbermann’s show.
Noon plus ten seconds: MSNBC informs Olbermann that under the terms of his contract, he cannot host a show elsewhere without the express written permission of MSNBC so long as they pay him. (I don’t know if this is the case, but there is usually boilerplate language to this effect in the contract of all broadcasting “talent”)
Noon plus thirty seconds: Olbermann’s head explodes.

As for suing MSNBC, I have to ask one question—Who else would have him? Seriously, could he get a job with Fox “News”? CNN? His old pal Hillary Clinton?

484 ClaudeMonet  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 11:33:40pm

re: #205 SteveC

John Dickinson: Are you calling me a coward?
John Adams: Yes… coward!
John Dickinson: Madman!
John Adams: Landlord!
John Dickinson: LAWYER!

(Riot breaks out)

One of my favorite parts of 1776. My favorite performance of all was one I wasn’t even in. The guy who had played Col. McKean in the production in which I was “Andrew McNair, Congressional Custodian” was playing the same role again. Last night of the production, the riot breaks out, his job is to fire his musket to break it up. He fired and…click. Recocked, fired…click. He was more than a little upset after the show—“It just had to happen on the last night. No chance for redemption…”

485 ClaudeMonet  Sat, Nov 6, 2010 11:44:52pm

re: #294 Rightwingconspirator

I email or chat with his staff from time to time. He’s actually pretty moderate for a guy with 80%. Responsive.

If you got one response from Berman, it’s the same as the total I got from Boehner in the 14 years I lived in his district. I would write an annual letter to him, mostly but not totally about tax law and procedure, and the a-hole wouldn’t even send a form letter back. The one letter I got was as much solicitation for funds as response.

Prick.

re: #335 Slumbering Behemoth

Feh. You’re fuckin’ useless. Guess I’ll go speak to an accountant or something.
/

If you’re in a mood to type, I’m in a mood to read. Have at it, if you will.

I’m an accountant. You rang? :)

Since it’s November, I’m in one of my “better” moods. If you have a question, believe me, this is the time to ask. (I’ll answer, even in March, but you get faster and less obscene answers now)

486 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Sun, Nov 7, 2010 1:30:54am

re: #482 MurphysMom

It is perhaps possible you really don’t realize that saying it’s a statement of the obvious is yet another insult.

Let me try to explain this to you:

You speculated, negatively, about my parenting skills.

I told you that was rude.

You responded by saying that was obviously a sore point— meaning that your insulting speculation was accurate, that my parenting skills were poor.

So, that was yet another insult.

Do you understand?

487 KayInMaine  Sun, Nov 7, 2010 4:58:43am

I bet Keith was trying to make a point to his bosses who had given over $1,000,000 to candidates. If he loses his job over it, I don’t think he would care. He’s done this before on his show where he lambasted his bosses over the freedom of speech while on the air. Now with Comcast coming into the picture, I’m sure he felt like he needed to do something knowing full well what the consequences were. Once Comcast takes over MSNBC, they’ll try to get Maddow off the air too. The media has never been liberal as some like to say it is, so with the only two liberals off the air, there isn’t one person who can say the media is liberal! Seriously, I don’t think the average American understand what is happening and has been happening to our media in this country. Even the New York Times is leaning far right most days! Gees.

488 MurphysMom  Sun, Nov 7, 2010 6:35:37am

re: #486 Obdicut

I understand that no amount of apologizing will be sufficient to ease your pain. It’s useless for me to try again.

489 ClaudeMonet  Sun, Nov 7, 2010 8:09:56am

re: #487 KayInMaine

I bet Keith was trying to make a point to his bosses who had given over $1,000,000 to candidates. If he loses his job over it, I don’t think he would care. He’s done this before on his show where he lambasted his bosses over the freedom of speech while on the air. Now with Comcast coming into the picture, I’m sure he felt like he needed to do something knowing full well what the consequences were. Once Comcast takes over MSNBC, they’ll try to get Maddow off the air too. The media has never been liberal as some like to say it is, so with the only two liberals off the air, there isn’t one person who can say the media is liberal! Seriously, I don’t think the average American understand what is happening and has been happening to our media in this country. Even the New York Times is leaning far right most days! Gees.

NYT leaning far right? Wow. If the NYT is far right, (a) then I’m 7’5”, and (b) I’d like to see what’s medium to far left.

I finally made it through the video, and while Maddow finally acknowledges the simple truth—that MSNBC has a policy, that Olbermann violated it, and that he was suspended based on the policy—she also spends most of her time bashing Fox “News” because some of their hosts donate as much or more and don’t acknowledge it.

Guess what, Ms. Maddow? What Fox “News” does is irrelevant in this case (as it is in most others). MSNBC holds itself to be better than that. Olbermann was not suspended because he did what Fox “News” ranters do regularly; he was suspended because he violated MSNBC policy.

Now I’ll admit that I can’t stand Olbermann, mostly because he’s a ranting, hate-filled blowhard a-hole, as obnoxious and spiteful as Hannity is on Fox “News”. However, that’s not why he was suspended. He violated what apparently is clearly stated company policy, and again, it doesn’t matter that the other guys do it, too.

490 KayInMaine  Sun, Nov 7, 2010 8:18:56am

re: #489 ClaudeMonet

Well, the truth is MSNBC does not go by NBC’s rules and if you read the verbiage for the policy in question, it’s not mandatory. More like a suggestion….


“Anyone working for NBC News who takes part in civic or other outside activities may find that these activities jeopardize his or her standing as an impartial journalist because they may create the appearance of a conflict of interest. Such activities may include participation in or contributions to political campaigns or groups that espouse controversial positions. You should report any such potential conflicts in advance to, and obtain prior approval of, the President of NBC News or his designee.”

His only “crime” was he didn’t get permission first. Apparently, it’s okay for the owners of MSNBC (who do they get permission from?) to make $1,000,000 in campaign donations, but it’s not okay for Keith to make a total of $7200 in donation. I could see it if Keith had made $90,000 in donations or even $1,000,000, but $7200? Silly!

Honestly, I understand having this kind of policy in place. All media outlets should have this kind of clause! Fox News doesn’t and they gladly exploit it. Anyway….

I listen to Glenn Beck and Howie Carr out of Boston and almost every week they’re talking about at least one “great article” in the New York Times that supports their position. I don’t get the NYTs, so my statement above is from what I’m hearing coming out of their mouths only. Even Howie Carr has stated that the NYTs is more enjoyable to read which tells me it’s leaning more to the right than left. Agree?

491 joest73  Sun, Nov 7, 2010 8:52:04am

Here is a good article from David Zurawik, the liberal leaning TV critic at the Baltimore Sun:

weblogs.baltimoresun.com

Free Keith: Watching MSNBC go off the rails…

I promised myself a break this weekend after going deep into the election and hitting the outrageous behavior of MSNBC on election night as hard as I could the last few days.

I still deeply feel the actions of its analysts — Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, Chris Matthews, Lawrence O’Donnell and the Washington Post’s Eugene Robinson — were so egregious in the rude and hectoring handling of conservative politicians invited on for interviews that the entire realm of TV journalism was diminished in the public mind.

492 LRonHoover  Sun, Nov 7, 2010 9:25:57am

re: #490 KayInMaine

I agree, it’s silly that they suspended him. He didn’t jeopardize his standing as an impartial journalist because, with me at least, he never had any standing as an impartial journalist. If someone like say Chuck Todd was doing this it would damage his standing with me.

493 KayInMaine  Sun, Nov 7, 2010 10:19:01am

re: #492 LRonHoover

LOL Well, that’s a matter of opinion about Chuck Todd. :D Anyway, the point is….I think Keith was trying to make a statement towards his higher ups and because of the angry environment in this year’s election, I don’t think he gave a rat’s behind if he got caught or not. He’s gone after Phil Griffin of MSNBC before, so for Keith it was a matter of principle. It will be interesting if the Comcast owner decides to get rid of Maddow too if Keith goes in the end. If he (Comcast) does, then there really will not be a balance in our news shows at all. Sad.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
3 weeks ago
Views: 440 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1