1 | efuseakay Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:13:11pm |
Makes you wonder...
[Link: news.yahoo.com...]
I think Trentadue is too close to the situation to offer any kind of objective analysis... JMHO...
2 | freetoken Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:14:31pm |
re: #1 efuseakay
Or he is just looking for his 15 minutes of fame.
3 | Dark_Falcon Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:15:35pm |
re: #2 freetoken
Or he is just looking for his 15 minutes of fame.
Either that or he's a False Flag Troofer.
6 | reine.de.tout Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:24:14pm |
re: #5 ggt
weet dreams all!
weet dreams, ggt.
So I have a cold, and I crashed this afternoon and napped, and now I can't sleep, and the place is empty.
*sigh*
7 | Sloppy Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:24:32pm |
Just what we need -- a demand for the Troof in what most probably had considered a closed case. Excuse me if I can't get interested.
8 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:26:00pm |
"You're gonna run into jerk offs. But remember, it's not the size of the asshole you worry about, it's how much shit comes out of it."
9 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:26:21pm |
re: #6 reine.de.tout
weet dreams, ggt.
So I have a cold, and I crashed this afternoon and napped, and now I can't sleep, and the place is empty.
*sigh*
I see... The rest of us are chopped liver. *sniff*
10 | reine.de.tout Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:26:52pm |
re: #9 Sharmuta
I see... The rest of us are chopped liver. *sniff*
There you are!
No, my dear - it just seemed - slow.
11 | Dark_Falcon Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:27:35pm |
re: #7 Sloppy
Just what we need -- a demand for the Troof in what most probably had considered a closed case. Excuse me if I can't get interested.
Still, best to slap jackasses like this one down quickly. Unless crushed quickly, conspiracy theories can take on a life their own and poison peoples minds for decades.
12 | Dancing along the light of day Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:28:43pm |
re: #6 reine.de.tout
Hi Reine!
*waves*
14 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:29:45pm |
re: #10 reine.de.tout
This time of the night, it is slower, but we can also have some great conversations. Last night was pretty cool- we had some talk about beck and birchers and neo-confederates... We'll see what happens tonight.
15 | Dancing along the light of day Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:29:49pm |
re: #13 reine.de.tout
Gonna go dig up my favorite beach/surfing video for you!
bbiab!
16 | reine.de.tout Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:31:33pm |
re: #14 Sharmuta
This time of the night, it is slower, but we can also have some great conversations. Last night was pretty cool- we had some talk about beck and birchers and neo-confederates... We'll see what happens tonight.
I'll be crashing again soon, I think. But it really is wayyy past my bedtime.
17 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:32:30pm |
I've an idea to speed things up. Quick, everybody turn on your webcams and take off your pants.
/
18 | reine.de.tout Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:33:07pm |
re: #17 Slumbering Behemoth
I've an idea to speed things up. Quick, everybody turn on your webcams and take off your pants.
/
Oh, you!
How do you know we haven't already done that?
19 | Dancing along the light of day Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:33:34pm |
re: #16 reine.de.tout
OK, this is a video of some of the biggest surf to hit the West Coast in 20 or more years. The sound track is good too. If it's a little black dot, it's probably a person. 45 seconds of ads at the beginning.
[Link: www.surfline.com...]
20 | Pietr Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:33:41pm |
re: #14 Sharmuta
This time of the night, it is slower, but we can also have some great conversations. Last night was pretty cool- we had some talk about beck and birchers and neo-confederates... We'll see what happens tonight.
My return seems to show a few friends missing, so I guess they got the door. But I'm here for a bit yet.
I noticed in browsing last nights open thread that there is no more fruit cup. Does this mean Little old Lady is gone also?
21 | Dancing along the light of day Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:34:23pm |
re: #20 Pietr
Yes, LOL is gone. Late nights can still be fun...
22 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:34:32pm |
re: #18 reine.de.tout
So that's why the thread is moving so slow.
/What is the sound of one hand typing?
23 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:34:38pm |
4 degrees warming "likely" without CO2 cuts
Global temperatures may be 4 degrees Celsius hotter by the mid-2050s if current greenhouse gas emissions trends continue, said a study published on Monday.
The study, by Britain's Met Office Hadley Centre, echoed a U.N. report last week which found that climate changes were outpacing worst-case scenarios forecast in 2007 by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
24 | lurking faith Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:35:16pm |
re: #22 Slumbering Behemoth
So that's why the thread is moving so slow.
/What is the sound of one hand typing?
I am so not going to answer that.
25 | reine.de.tout Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:36:27pm |
re: #19 Floral Giraffe
OK, this is a video of some of the biggest surf to hit the West Coast in 20 or more years. The sound track is good too. If it's a little black dot, it's probably a person. 45 seconds of ads at the beginning.
[Link: www.surfline.com...]
That was awesome!
I've always thought it must be wonderful to experience being inside a wave that's rolled over and formed a sort of tube. I'll never experience it, but when I see photos or videos - just incredible.
26 | Dark_Falcon Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:37:17pm |
Goodnight all. I'll be back in about 6-7 hours.
27 | reine.de.tout Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:37:42pm |
re: #26 Dark_Falcon
Goodnight all. I'll be back in about 6-7 hours.
Nite.
I'm out too.
Ya'll enjoy the evening - see ya tomorrow.
28 | Gus Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:38:14pm |
re: #14 Sharmuta
This time of the night, it is slower, but we can also have some great conversations. Last night was pretty cool- we had some talk about beck and birchers and neo-confederates... We'll see what happens tonight.
Last night I drifted off in here, went to ask a neighbor to turn down some music but got invited to the party.
Woke up at 3 PM with my head still hurting which is why I haven't said much today.
29 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:40:06pm |
re: #28 Gus 802
You went to a party and you didn't invite us to come with? I see how you are. Big meanie.
30 | Pietr Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:41:15pm |
re: #28 Gus 802
Last night I drifted off in here, went to ask a neighbor to turn down some music but got invited to the party.
Woke up at 3 PM with my head still hurting which is why I haven't said much today.
Well, I'm just relaxing and listening to youtubes of Alice Cooper and Arthur Brown (Fire)
31 | Gus Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:41:22pm |
re: #29 Sharmuta
You went to a party and you didn't invite us to come with? I see how you are. Big meanie.
Sorry my Learjet wasn't available. I came back really late, almost typed something but decided I was too out there and crashed.
32 | freetoken Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:42:59pm |
re: #23 Sharmuta
The UKMET is taking into account a possible increase in emissions of CO2 from human sources as well as increasing CO2 from the biosphere as an effect caused by the human input.
Please realize though that there is always a range of possible outcomes... a window if you like, within a given probability range (e.g., a window that would include 95% of the possible outcomes.)
The 4C figure is an upper limit of the "likely" outcomes from the specified scenario.
This gets complicated because there are two large sets of unknowns:
(1) human actions (e.g., how much coal will we burn, how many forests will we chop down...)
(2) the inherent randomness and even more so the essential chaotic nature of the integrated systems on Earth. See the Wiki entry for Edward Norton Lorenz the pioneer in this field.
33 | Gus Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:43:35pm |
re: #30 Pietr
Well, I'm just relaxing and listening to youtubes of Alice Cooper and Arthur Brown (Fire)
I use headphones and listen to some tunes from time to time.
Haven't seen you for a while.
Yeah, things are in flux around here but for good reason. Takes some reading if you really want to catch up.
34 | yael Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:44:03pm |
The ocean view is balm for the spirit. Thank you, Charles.
35 | Racer X Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:50:21pm |
The Death Star: Stormtroopers' 9/11
Future troofers.
37 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:53:27pm |
re: #32 freetoken
I figured that link would interest you. I hadn't heard China was agreeing to cut emissions. That might have an impact on the trend. The summit in Denmark should be interesting with this new study.
38 | freetoken Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:55:39pm |
re: #37 Sharmuta
Everyone in the world is in the same boat.
If I ever made a contemporary events type of blog I'd probably name it It's Just One Planet.
The only way to keep everybody on this planet from screwing themselves and each other is if we work together.
That is of course the hardest thing for us humans to do - work together. We tend to fight each other.
39 | SixDegrees Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:55:47pm |
re: #32 freetoken
The UKMET is taking into account a possible increase in emissions of CO2 from human sources as well as increasing CO2 from the biosphere as an effect caused by the human input.
Please realize though that there is always a range of possible outcomes... a window if you like, within a given probability range (e.g., a window that would include 95% of the possible outcomes.)
The 4C figure is an upper limit of the "likely" outcomes from the specified scenario.
This gets complicated because there are two large sets of unknowns:
(1) human actions (e.g., how much coal will we burn, how many forests will we chop down...)
(2) the inherent randomness and even more so the essential chaotic nature of the integrated systems on Earth. See the Wiki entry for Edward Norton Lorenz the pioneer in this field.
True. Another disturbing, more political problem arises from this statement:
The study, by Britain's Met Office Hadley Centre, echoed a U.N. report last week which found that climate changes were outpacing worst-case scenarios forecast in 2007 by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
So the predictions made by climate models as recently as two years ago were wrong. A situation which seems to occur frequently. Indicating that the models are imperfect, and - given the apparent surprise at the departure from the models reality has taken - that understanding of the underlying mechanisms is also incomplete.
Scientists get themselves into all sorts of trouble when they start making absolute pronouncements instead of doing science. Previous claims made - that the models used are accurate predictors, that the mechanisms of global warming are well enough understood to construct such models with confidence, that doing thus and so will have such and such an effect within so many years - only contribute to distrust of such pronouncements. It would be far less troublesome to simply state the uncertainties, shortcomings and measurable errors associated with such predictions than to make such absolute proclamations and then turn out to have missed the mark, as has happened here.
I'm sure Ludwig will be along shortly to denounce me as a denier, or heretic, without bothering to read what I've written. But as I've pointed out to him and others before: this sort of misrepresentation of climate modeling is far more of a hindrance than a help in convincing people that anything needs to be done. It make climate scientists look like incompetent chumps.
40 | Dancing along the light of day Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:56:56pm |
re: #25 reine.de.tout
Everyone grows up with different experiences.
At the beach, you learn to swim early & get "bounced" by the waves.
I am sure, there are unique experiences in your neighborhood!
41 | SixDegrees Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:58:59pm |
re: #37 Sharmuta
I figured that link would interest you. I hadn't heard China was agreeing to cut emissions. That might have an impact on the trend. The summit in Denmark should be interesting with this new study.
Well, China really isn't promising anything of the kind. They're promising to reduce their "carbon intensity," a term which no one can quite figure out, but which seems to mean that they'll maybe, sort of try to slow down their breakneck rate of growth of carbon emissions. If it doesn't cost too much.
No one I've heard who's analyzed the diplo-speak from last week's meetings sees anything in this statement indicating that actual reductions in CO2 production are coming from China.
42 | Sharmuta Sun, Sep 27, 2009 11:59:30pm |
re: #39 SixDegrees
Ludwig is celebrating Yom Kippur, so no. He won't be along shortly.
43 | SixDegrees Mon, Sep 28, 2009 12:00:26am |
re: #42 Sharmuta
Ludwig is celebrating Yom Kippur, so no. He won't be along shortly.
Ah, thanks. It'll keep until he returns, then.
44 | freetoken Mon, Sep 28, 2009 12:04:12am |
re: #39 SixDegrees
I think you aren't looking at this comprehensively.
If you look at the 2007 IPCC report, they clearly include a very wide range of possible outcomes depending upon both human-economic scenarios (the predictions of which were not the responsibility of the IPCC) as well as the expected variety of outcomes that any chaotic system has.
Don't confuse the most likely outcomes (which get all the publicity) from the range of possible outcomes or even the likely outcomes, of any given human-emissions scenario.
This is why publicizing science is so difficult. The products of the large, "coupled" models give a range of answers... the models are run many times with randomness added to give the breadth of possible physical results.
Furthermore, the authors of the IPCC stated explicitly that they were not able to include some climate phenomena due to lack of research (e.g., ice sheet changes.) One such area is the reaction of the biosphere to the changes humans have already caused. This is what the latest research from the UK Hadley center is trying to encompass.
45 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 12:04:17am |
re: #23 Sharmuta
Ha! The MET is useless in predicting anything.
47 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 28, 2009 12:06:49am |
re: #36 BigPapa
Yes. Beyonce is insanely cute.
/
48 | SixDegrees Mon, Sep 28, 2009 12:15:21am |
re: #44 freetoken
I think you aren't looking at this comprehensively.
If you look at the 2007 IPCC report, they clearly include a very wide range of possible outcomes depending upon both human-economic scenarios (the predictions of which were not the responsibility of the IPCC) as well as the expected variety of outcomes that any chaotic system has.
Don't confuse the most likely outcomes (which get all the publicity) from the range of possible outcomes or even the likely outcomes, of any given human-emissions scenario.
This is why publicizing science is so difficult. The products of the large, "coupled" models give a range of answers... the models are run many times with randomness added to give the breadth of possible physical results.
Furthermore, the authors of the IPCC stated explicitly that they were not able to include some climate phenomena due to lack of research (e.g., ice sheet changes.) One such area is the reaction of the biosphere to the changes humans have already caused. This is what the latest research from the UK Hadley center is trying to encompass.
I'd be a lot happier if I saw two short paragraphs of explanation, rather than the sound bites stating absolute outcomes that are reported. Yes, I understand that this is a problem with the media, but it's up to scientists to be aware of those shortcomings and work to correct them. And scientists are often culpable, as well; we are increasingly seeing "science by news conference" where scientists present just such abbreviated, sound-bite versions of their work emphasizing the spectacular and ominous, and tossing aside all subtlety, with maybe a single throwaway murmur of "See our full report in the August 28 Science." This race to the bottom between media and scientists only makes the problem worse, and leaves the impression I bitched about earlier intact.
The UN is also notorious for this sort of tabloidization. When the World Health Organization successfully eradicated smallpox - perhaps one of the top two or three human achievements, ever - they got all sorts of well-deserved praise and publicity. Their parent organization, the UN, felt a need to snag some of that spotlight for itself, even though the smallpox effort had been run by WHO without any direct UN involvement, and started making all sorts of ridiculous statements, like listing all the diseases that would follow smallpox into oblivion, starting - inexplicably - with rabies, a disease which defies such efforts because of it's enormous range of hosts. The stupid emanating from the UN in this instance was enough to burn your skin off, and it hasn't gotten any better since then.
49 | Pietr Mon, Sep 28, 2009 12:17:11am |
re: #33 Gus 802
I use headphones and listen to some tunes from time to time.
Haven't seen you for a while.
Yeah, things are in flux around here but for good reason. Takes some reading if you really want to catch up.
I took a total break shortly after DustyVets sister died, and HH, Walter, and FBV made sure he was able to attend the services. I've seen some things on the news and occasionally swung by to glance at the front page, but I needed to give myself some downtime.
Today I just decided to get back in the saddle, and read Blackfive, Baldilocks, and then settled here for most of the afternoon and evening. It seems I'd need to read back aways to try and glean all that has gone down, and who is left of those I liked and oft chatted with, sigh. I shut down back around the end of April...just needed a break.
50 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 28, 2009 12:24:03am |
re: #49 Pietr
OOH, do you correspond with DustyVet?
I miss him here.
I know he was having some hard times, with his sister passing.
But, haven't seen him since.
Hope he's doing OK.
51 | Pietr Mon, Sep 28, 2009 12:39:55am |
re: #50 Floral Giraffe
OOH, do you correspond with DustyVet?
I miss him here.
I know he was having some hard times, with his sister passing.
But, haven't seen him since.
Hope he's doing OK.
I had Realwest send me his address at that time, so it is probably in my saved files. I sent him condolences and later spoke with him on the board. So Dusty, LOL, and RW are all gone? And Red. our South African working/living friend, he was supposed to move to Florida this past June, is he gone as well?
53 | Pietr Mon, Sep 28, 2009 12:42:07am |
54 | Fenway_Nation Mon, Sep 28, 2009 12:44:20am |
re: #53 Pietr
Not a problem, Pietr. Sometimes that pesky 'real life' will do that.
55 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 12:46:26am |
re: #48 SixDegrees
The stupid emanating from the UN in this instance was enough to burn your skin off, and it hasn't gotten any better since then.
One can't plan a picnic 2 hours out based upon the MET forecasts, and their seasonal projections based upon their computer models have been hopelessly wrong 3 years running. I think they need to tweak them a bit before they can be taken seriously 40 years out.
The MET does its best at emanating stupid but nothing can truly compete with the UN.
56 | Pietr Mon, Sep 28, 2009 12:48:26am |
re: #54 Fenway_Nation
Not a problem, Pietr. Sometimes that pesky 'real life' will do that.
Amen. I was fighting plumbing problems off and on thru April and May, and we were on water restrictions to boot, sigh. My water bills were almost double, and I swear someone was sabotaging my front water faucet. It was always 15 or more degrees of plumb whenever the new fittings suddenly started 'leaking'.
57 | Fenway_Nation Mon, Sep 28, 2009 12:49:18am |
Where's Slumbering, anyway? I thought he was supposed to be handing in that script for the episode of Fenway & The Behemoth with special guest-writer Quentin Tarantino.
58 | Pietr Mon, Sep 28, 2009 12:52:55am |
re: #56 Pietr
Amen. I was fighting plumbing problems off and on thru April and May, and we were on water restrictions to boot, sigh. My water bills were almost double, and I swear someone was sabotaging my front water faucet. It was always 15 or more degrees OFF plumb whenever the new fittings suddenly started 'leaking'.
PIMF.
re: #57 Fenway_Nation
Where's Slumbering, anyway? I thought he was supposed to be handing in that script for the episode of Fenway & The Behemoth with special guest-writer Quentin Tarantino.
he last posted aound post 22, about an hour ago, maybe?
59 | Fenway_Nation Mon, Sep 28, 2009 12:53:50am |
re: #56 Pietr
Yea...I had kinda disappeared weeknights during the last month or so thanks to working graveyard shift.
60 | Pietr Mon, Sep 28, 2009 12:55:49am |
re: #57 Fenway_Nation
Where's Slumbering, anyway? I thought he was supposed to be handing in that script for the episode of Fenway & The Behemoth with special guest-writer Quentin Tarantino.
My bad, post 47 was his last entry.
61 | freetoken Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:05:55am |
Time for some Japanese Doo-wop?
62 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:07:52am |
re: #57 Fenway_Nation
I've been popping in and out.
Where's Slumbering, anyway? I thought he was supposed to be handing in that script for the episode of Fenway & The Behemoth with special guest-writer Quentin Tarantino.
Which one?
The one where you and I speak at great length, and with incredible narrative detail beyond which any normal human is capable of, about shit that didn't to happen to us?
Or the one where I nick my finger cutting Tri-Tip, and it becomes a gusher that sprays gallons of blood all over the studio, ala "Fist of the North Star"?
/Or are you referring to the foot fetish episode?
///
63 | Pietr Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:08:28am |
re: #55 Bagua
I have seen too many scientists say they were against certain climate speculation they supposedly endorsed, so I can't take GW as a proven fact. We are due a solar flare cycle, but they were predicting LOWER temps for the next few years, last time I heard. Likewise the calving of glaciers in Antactica is actually offset by a thickening of the ice on the other 90% of the continent, from what I've read. Hard to believe something that (the research on) is funded by people who want to prove GW exists, lol.
65 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:23:08am |
66 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:26:32am |
re: #63 Pietr
If the MET hadn't called for those "barbecue summers" and droughts ahead of what turned out to seasons of abnormal cold, rain, and floods they might have a bit more credibility with the public that they have a handle on predictions decades out.
67 | freetoken Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:28:16am |
re: #66 Bagua
Hmmm... it actually works the opposite.
Think of tossing a coin. I have only about a 50% chance of accurately telling you what that flip's outcome will be.
However, if you flip a coin every minute for the next year, I can pretty assuredly tell you that almost half of them will be heads.
68 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:32:40am |
re: #67 freetoken
Yes I see your point, getting it stunningly wrong three years in a row, including winters, indicates their long range predictions must be more accurate. Certainly they could couldn't be more wrong so more right is a safe bet.
70 | Pietr Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:34:45am |
re: #67 freetoken
Hmmm... it actually works the opposite.
Think of tossing a coin. I have only about a 50% chance of accurately telling you what that flip's outcome will be.
However, if you flip a coin every minute for the next year, I can pretty assuredly tell you that almost half of them will be heads.
Your're using the law of probability there, though, and that is a shade more accurate than an eco freak, or even an oceanographer, trying to predict GLOBAL climate fifty years out, lol. We have no Global Weather science as yet, just speculation by some who are experts in this or that area of science. How many times have they mispredicted hurricane seasons and La Nina, lol.
71 | freetoken Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:37:31am |
re: #68 Bagua
No, I'm not saying the sequence of expectations improves in quality, I'm saying a larger set of measured events is easier to predict.
72 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:39:31am |
re: #69 Jimmah
Jeez that is elderly.
And no, Johnny, there is no "could be". You are without a doubt "white".
74 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:43:51am |
re: #67 freetoken
Hmmm... it actually works the opposite.
Think of tossing a coin. I have only about a 50% chance of accurately telling you what that flip's outcome will be.
However, if you flip a coin every minute for the next year, I can pretty assuredly tell you that almost half of them will be heads.
Hmm, wait a sec. Been a while since I took a class in probability, but the problem with teh coin toss and the gambler's fallacy is that every individual coin flip always has a 50% chance of coming up heads (say). People watching you flip a (fair, nonweighted) coin tend to mistakenly think that because it came up heads 7 times in a row, it's more likely to come up tails on the 8th toss-- but the 8th flip has just the same odds of coming up heads as ever, namely, 50%.
There is a point where with a really large number of coin tosses you do get a levelling out, and can reasonably state that the results will be 50-50 -- but it's an incredibly large number. I don't think the one per minute for a whole year is close enough to it. Not sure though.
I'm being a pedant here though, and in practice it works as a good guess that it would be 50-50, and you're making all the right points about the way the probablity of the individual toss works.
75 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:44:33am |
re: #70 Pietr
Your're using the law of probability there, though, and that is a shade more accurate than an eco freak, or even an oceanographer, trying to predict GLOBAL climate fifty years out, lol. We have no Global Weather science as yet, just speculation by some who are experts in this or that area of science. How many times have they mispredicted hurricane seasons and La Nina, lol.
Well no, we do have some science, the question is the accuracy of the future models and their various assumptions.
re: #71 freetoken
No, I'm not saying the sequence of expectations improves in quality, I'm saying a larger set of measured events is easier to predict.
Yes I know, but it's more humorous the way I worded it.
Alternatively, if the short range errors indicate problems with the underlying models then the longer range predictions are even less accurate as they could be mistaking the underlying trend.
76 | freetoken Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:44:42am |
re: #70 Pietr
No, not quite. Or, not at all.
Why do you use the term "Global Weather"? Climate is not weather. Climate is either (1) the long term trends in observations of past events, or (2) the expected values of future events over a long period of time, all w.r.t. the characteristics of the Earth's surface/atmosphere boundary.
The law of large numbers comes into play as we look at larger and larger sets of events.
For example: the climate here in SD is described as "mediterranean" which means very limited rain, year round moderate temperature, large amount of sunshine, and essentially 2 seasons. I am ≻ 99.9% confident that the average over next 10 years in San Diego will fit that description. However, looking at the driveway leading up to my place, I have no idea over which square inch of that surface the next rain drop will fall, whenever it rains again in San Diego.
77 | Fenway_Nation Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:44:44am |
80 | Aye Pod Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:47:27am |
re: #72 Slumbering Behemoth
Jeez that is elderly.
And no, Johnny, there is no "could be". You are without a doubt "white".
It is elderly but great. About the black white thing - lol - I think the song is trying to describe the plight of someone who can no longer determine anything for himself, no matter how obvious? But yes - Johhny Rotten is so white he's practically blue, that is certainly true.
81 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:47:38am |
re: #74 iceweasel
Yes, but you are also referring to a presumably random event, a coin toss without bias to either result. As the MET is dealing in predictions based upon their own models and assumptions, we can not give them the benefit of the doubt that they will revert to a random result. They are forcing for a hot result.
82 | freetoken Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:48:58am |
re: #74 iceweasel
According to Google, there are 31,556,926 seconds in a year.
You could calculate the probability distribution of what 31,556,926 flips of a coin would bring you... and I suspect you would find a really, really sharp peak around .5 .
84 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:49:26am |
re: #81 Bagua
Yes, but you are also referring to a presumably random event, a coin toss without bias to either result. As the MET is dealing in predictions based upon their own models and assumptions, we can not give them the benefit of the doubt that they will revert to a random result. They are forcing for a hot result.
Oh yeah, totally. I was making a small pedantic and orthogonal point about probability and the coin toss. Definitely doesn't apply to the MET issue.
I really need to go back to just posting videos right now..
86 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:52:06am |
It is 4:51am, do you know what time it is?
88 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:52:28am |
re: #79 ScullyDog
Anyway, I hope the site finds it's way back to the attitude is had a while ago.
What attitude would that be, in your opinion?
89 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:52:44am |
re: #82 freetoken
According to Google, there are 31,556,926 seconds in a year.
You could calculate the probability distribution of what 31,556,926 flips of a coin would bring you... and I suspect you would find a really, really sharp peak around .5 .
I don't think so, FT. Check out the section I linked about Bayes Theorem. Every one of the possible outcomes of those flips has a 1 in 31,556,926 possibility of happening. That applies to the one where it's 50/50 as well as to the one where it's all heads.
But there would be a huge cluster right around the midpoint, I think, covering a whole lot of outcomes close to the 50/50 mark. We really need someone who's in math or up on this. Ludwig probably knows.
90 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:54:32am |
91 | Aye Pod Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:55:34am |
re: #87 ScullyDog
I wouldn't count on being able to do that if I were you.
92 | freetoken Mon, Sep 28, 2009 1:58:53am |
re: #89 iceweasel
Yes, you get a distribution over all the possible values. However, after 31,556,926 tries you have a very good chance that your total (say of heads) is close to 15,778,463.
Now, to get all scientific about it, one has to decide how many significant digits one wants to carry. If it is two (as is the case in climate predictions of expected temperatures), I'd say your total of heads after 31,556,926 tries ought to be around 1.6 x 10^7 .
93 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:00:48am |
re: #90 Bagua
RadCap continues to rage in ALLCAPS on the dead thread.
heh. It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again!
PUT THE LOTION IN THE BASKET!
94 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:01:19am |
re: #92 freetoken
"I was told there would be no math..."
-Chevy Chase as Gerald Ford...
96 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:02:28am |
re: #93 iceweasel
That's sinister... but of course quite valid.
97 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:05:44am |
re: #93 iceweasel
Put the fucking lotion in the basket!
-Silence, The Musical...
99 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:08:01am |
re: #95 Jimmah
Christ. It's the late night arithmetic thread.
No we were pissing about the MET's inability to predict the weather. The calls to numeracy were a hijack meant to distract the faithful with LOGIC.
RadCap will find us soon and clarify the point.
101 | SixDegrees Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:11:01am |
re: #89 iceweasel
I don't think so, FT. Check out the section I linked about Bayes Theorem. Every one of the possible outcomes of those flips has a 1 in 31,556,926 possibility of happening. That applies to the one where it's 50/50 as well as to the one where it's all heads.
But there would be a huge cluster right around the midpoint, I think, covering a whole lot of outcomes close to the 50/50 mark. We really need someone who's in math or up on this. Ludwig probably knows.
If you do the experiment over and over and over again, you'll get a different outcome each time. The outcomes can vary from all heads to all tails and every possible mix in in between. What you'll find is that the outcomes fall onto a normal distribution - a bell curve - in a nice illustration of the Central Limit Theorem. The probability of the outcome being 0.5 or very near 0.5 is quite high, but not 1.0. The probability of the outcome being 0.0 or 1.0 (counting proportion of heads, say) is quite low, but not 0.
102 | Aye Pod Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:11:07am |
103 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:11:13am |
re: #100 freetoken
how'd you dig out that reference?
Oh, FT, I was just being silly. I wanted to post a link to talking barbie saying 'math is hard' because i thought it would be funny. But there don't seem to be any youtube vids of it.
{FT}
104 | flyers1974 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:11:14am |
From Foreign Affairs, The case for Negotiating with the Enemy
When should [governments] negotiate with their enemies?
On the one hand, failing to set preconditions when they are useful can undermine the effectiveness of a negotiating strategy. On the other hand, preconditions that are ill conceived may eliminate the prospect of diplomatic engagement.
One should never set preconditions without a clear understanding of the other side's perspective.
THE CONDITIONS FOR PRECONDITIONS
To determine whether and when to impose preconditions, governments should make two assessments. First, is the other side capable of meeting the demand? Far too often, preconditions are set without regard to the constraints that the opponent faces or the limits of the negotiation partner's influence. Second, will agreeing to the precondition significantly reduce the other side's bargaining power? When one side demands that the other make a highly valued, irrevocable concession before negotiations even begin, such a precondition will almost surely be rejected. Preconditions are appropriate only when they satisfy both criteria: the opponent is capable of meeting them, and doing so will not weaken its future leverage. Otherwise, they will serve no purpose except to create the impression that the other side has thwarted diplomatic efforts. Demands that ignore these criteria suggest either a flawed strategy or an attempt at political gamesmanship -- or perhaps both.
[Link: www.foreignaffairs.com...]
105 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:13:07am |
re: #93 iceweasel
I, for the life of me, will never understand why Ted Levine was not even nominated for an Oscar for that role. Was the bravest acting role that I've ever seen.
One of three movies that consistently makes my top ten.
106 | Aye Pod Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:13:29am |
re: #99 Bagua
No we were pissing about the MET's inability to predict the weather. The calls to numeracy were a hijack meant to distract the faithful with LOGIC.
RadCap will find us soon and clarify the point.
Heh. I know. I was just looking for any old excuse to post that Lene Lovich tune :)
107 | freetoken Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:14:12am |
Wow, I just found out Throbert got banned... things are happening so quickly around here I can't keep up with them.
There is a real fallout happening in the various xyz-o-spheres, it appears. The uneasy political alliance post 9/11 brought all sorts of disparate people together.
108 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:14:18am |
re: #101 SixDegrees
If you do the experiment over and over and over again, you'll get a different outcome each time. The outcomes can vary from all heads to all tails and every possible mix in in between. What you'll find is that the outcomes fall onto a normal distribution - a bell curve - in a nice illustration of the Central Limit Theorem. The probability of the outcome being 0.5 or very near 0.5 is quite high, but not 1.0. The probability of the outcome being 0.0 or 1.0 (counting proportion of heads, say) is quite low, but not 0.
Yeah, exactly -- i realised too late that FT was saying the exact same thing in his 82. BTW, my 'math is hard' comment wasn't at all about him or anything, just a general 'late night arithmatic silly vid' post.
Here's another number vid!
Everclear cover
109 | Aye Pod Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:15:42am |
re: #93 iceweasel
heh. It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again!
PUT THE LOTION IN THE BASKET!
There is an episode of south park where cartman is playing in his room with some dolls - re-enacting that scene with them, complete with hole dug out in floor :)
110 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:16:16am |
re: #107 freetoken
Wow, I just found out Throbert got banned... things are happening so quickly around here I can't keep up with them.
There is a real fallout happening in the various xyz-o-spheres, it appears. The uneasy political alliance post 9/11 brought all sorts of disparate people together.
That (throbert) was pending for at least two weeks. He was increasingly hostile and getting kind of weird.
111 | Pietr Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:16:29am |
re: #104 flyers1974
Your Nic-Would that be the UD Flyers when they won the big dance?
112 | freetoken Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:16:39am |
re: #108 iceweasel
Well, I guess my whole point was that determining the average temperature of the globe over a 10-year time window is different than determining tomorrow's high temperature for any specific city.
113 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:17:08am |
re: #107 freetoken
Throbert banned at long last? He of the nine lives.
What proved his undoing exactly, he pushed every boundary he could find.
114 | freetoken Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:18:40am |
115 | flyers1974 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:20:36am |
re: #111 Pietr
Your Nic-Would that be the UD Flyers when they won the big dance?
Philadelphia Flyers.
116 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:22:11am |
re: #110 iceweasel
That (throbert) was pending for at least two weeks. He was increasingly hostile and getting kind of weird.
You mean there was a time he was normal?
re: #112 freetoken
Well, I guess my whole point was that determining the average temperature of the globe over a 10-year time window is different than determining tomorrow's high temperature for any specific city.
Different, yes, but more accurate would depend on the validity of the underlying assumptions. If they called the longer range trend wrong they could be more wrong as they dealt with longer periods.
Also, the MET's blunders were not short term weather, they were calling for seasonal shifts based upon their climate models which turned out to be good only on opposite day.
117 | BryQan Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:26:17am |
Guess this is as good as place as any to say hello. I got in on the short registration.
I'm in the military, currently stationed in Naval District Washington (D.C.). Married have a 16 month old son.
I came to this site via someone on twitter...I honestly don't know who mentioned it but I've been lurking for a few weeks.
118 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:28:43am |
re: #117 BryQan
Whaddup BryQan? I was gonna ask "Why you up so early..." then realized you were military. Had to get up to protect me.
Thanks!
119 | Fenway_Nation Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:29:29am |
re: #117 BryQan
C'mon in, BryQan- Thread's just fine...
122 | Pietr Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:40:17am |
re: #120 bagua
Welcome BryQan, speak friend and enter.
Are you really gonna make him use that password, lol?
123 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:40:49am |
re: #110 iceweasel
Oh dear, Salamatis has arrived on the dead thread to overwhelm poor radcap with actual REASON, this is a dirty trick, there will be nothing left to flounce.
124 | Pietr Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:42:16am |
126 | Pietr Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:49:41am |
re: #125 Fenway_Nation
I thought this was the dead thread!
I was wondering about that. No drinking thread, no puns, etc.. I think the last joke was from SteveC in the previous thread, lol.
127 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:52:00am |
re: #123 Bagua
Oh dear, Salamatis has arrived on the dead thread to overwhelm poor radcap with actual REASON, this is a dirty trick, there will be nothing left to flounce.
Yeah, I had to join in there again with you guys. :)
re: #121 Jimmah
Jimmah-ski. :)
This is my other new fave video for people...
128 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:55:46am |
re: #119 Fenway_Nation
C'mon in, BryQan- Thread's just fine...
Don't listen to him, BryQan. He'll slip you ruffies, then try to bugger you when you're passed out.
/
129 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:58:54am |
re: #128 Slumbering Behemoth
Don't listen to him, BryQan. He'll slip you ruffies, then try to bugger you when you're passed out.
/
Where does one get ruffies? I'm married.
130 | Fenway_Nation Mon, Sep 28, 2009 2:59:33am |
131 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:01:38am |
re: #130 Fenway_Nation
That was never proven in a court of law...
/
Do not confuse us with trifling things like guilt or innocence. It has a certain ring of truth to it.
132 | Pietr Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:02:33am |
re: #129 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Where does one get ruffies? I'm married.
Hmm, FBV? That brings up why you need them: so that you can indulge at home, so that you can avoid indulging at home, or so that you can indulge elsewhere, Hmm?
/white smoke
133 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:03:27am |
re: #129 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
You're married? Poor Bastard. You don't need ruffies, you need Tri-Tip and beer. For you, not her.
/
134 | freetoken Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:03:29am |
Found (in a dumpster behind a bar down in the Gaslamp Quarter) this Sekritly recorded video, of a stalker discussing their past brilliant contributions in discussions around the World Wide Web:
135 | Aye Pod Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:27:13am |
re: #127 iceweasel
Jimmah-ski. :)
This is my other new fave video for people...
I love it - just so perfect. Ironically enough, I have footage of Lily Allen's dad Keith flouncing!
136 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:29:31am |
Well that reminded me of taking out the garbage - a necessary yet entirely intellectually unchallenging exercise.
137 | cenotaphium Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:30:34am |
I just realized I'm going to be out of synch with this site pretty often.
Or to put it another way, "good morning"! :D
138 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:31:44am |
re: #135 Jimmah
I love it - just so perfect. Ironically enough, I have footage of Lily Allen's dad Keith flouncing!
"I'm A Tory And I Love Cocaine"
Heh.
re: #137 cenotaphium
I just realized I'm going to be out of synch with this site pretty often.
Or to put it another way, "good morning"! :D
Hey there!
139 | Aye Pod Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:35:42am |
re: #138 iceweasel
Do you remember the actor Oliver Reed? He is another one with quite a history of 'memorable' appearances on talk shows...
140 | Pietr Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:35:52am |
Suppose I should get off my butt and feed the animals, sigh. I try to feed my dog and stray kitties early enough tha they eat their food, and not let the neighborhood pigeons eat it.
141 | cenotaphium Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:36:29am |
Some soft music for the late night or early morning?
(another local band, this one from my hometown)
Heed - Seldom Seen
142 | bloodnok Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:36:38am |
re: #137 cenotaphium
I just realized I'm going to be out of synch with this site pretty often.
Or to put it another way, "good morning"! :D
Don't worry. This place has no hours and there is a cool person or three around at any given time. Case in point the last few posters. Get to know them. You'll be glad you did.
143 | bloodnok Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:41:13am |
re: #139 Jimmah
Do you remember the actor Oliver Reed? He is another one with quite a history of 'memorable' appearances on talk shows...
[Video]
The standard bearer, though maybe only because it is so cool:
144 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:41:45am |
I logged off to read a few chapters of Dawkins' The Greatest Show On Earth while listening to Divided By Night by Crystal Method, and was just checking back to see if there was any clean-up to bat...;~)
145 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:42:42am |
re: #136 Salamantis
Well that reminded me of taking out the garbage - a necessary yet entirely intellectually unchallenging exercise.
Yes, it did seem a bit rote, almost flat emotionally, perhaps you need another drink?
146 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:44:27am |
re: #145 Bagua
Yes, it did seem a bit rote, almost flat emotionally, perhaps you need another drink?
When I'm reading academic, I wanna get out of it what the author put into it, so I stick to nonalcoholic beverages - in this case, sweet tea...
147 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:49:18am |
re: #139 Jimmah
So, you said "Oliver Reed". Which for some reason led me to think of "Robert Reed" (Mike Brady) which made me think of "Bonanza" which made me think of Ben Cartwright.
All three of his son's mothers died in child-birth. Which makes me think that had Ben had a fourth wife, she might have gone on the pill.
See how my mind works?
148 | Aye Pod Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:49:56am |
re: #143 bloodnok
The standard bearer, though maybe only because it is so cool:
Heh! That was the end of Bill Grundy's prime time career.
150 | freetoken Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:58:37am |
Hmmm... I see we have a returnee to the Inhofe thread... I hate to keep old threads alive, but I'm tempted to go down there and comment... or, should I just keep on watching my Dreamweaver training videos? Decisions, decisions...
151 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 3:59:10am |
re: #147 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
So, you said "Oliver Reed". Which for some reason led me to think of "Robert Reed" (Mike Brady) which made me think of "Bonanza" which made me think of Ben Cartwright.
All three of his son's mothers died in child-birth. Which makes me think that had Ben had a fourth wife, she might have gone on the pill.
See how my mind works?
Totally agree with you on silence of the lambs and that guy deserving an oscar btw.
How are you, you sexy Bastard?
152 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:00:34am |
re: #151 iceweasel
Feelin' right sexy, thank ye.
153 | freetoken Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:04:00am |
I really don't know what to think of someone who claims that we were set on a leftist course by Woodrow Wilson, and complains about it in the year 2009... just doesn't compute.
154 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:08:51am |
re: #153 freetoken
I really don't know what to think of someone who claims that we were set on a leftist course by Woodrow Wilson, and complains about it in the year 2009... just doesn't compute.
I think they've been reading Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg - that revisionist crapola will illegitimately screw with one's rational political categories.
155 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:09:44am |
156 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:10:27am |
re: #153 freetoken
I really don't know what to think of someone who claims that we were set on a leftist course by Woodrow Wilson, and complains about it in the year 2009... just doesn't compute.
They've been infected by propaganda about the word 'progressive', and also succumbed to crazed rhetoric about the UN. Wilson is hated by some of the hardcore ant-govt, "i live in fear of a one world government", "Teh UN is teh Great Satan" types, for founding the League of Nations.
I've been noticing a rise in Wilson bashing, as well as teddy roosevelt. The demand for ideological purity, as well as the insistance that the other Americans -- those who elected Obama-- are somehow seditious antiamerican bastards, is now leading the wingnuts to purge even former Presidents as 'not one of us'.
Used to be they reserved their POTUS hate for ones in their living memory. No longer.
157 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:13:03am |
re: #156 iceweasel
They've been infected by propaganda about the word 'progressive', and also succumbed to crazed rhetoric about the UN. Wilson is hated by some of the hardcore ant-govt, "i live in fear of a one world government", "Teh UN is teh Great Satan" types, for founding the League of Nations.
I've been noticing a rise in Wilson bashing, as well as teddy roosevelt. The demand for ideological purity, as well as the insistance that the other Americans -- those who elected Obama-- are somehow seditious antiamerican bastards, is now leading the wingnuts to purge even former Presidents as 'not one of us'.
Used to be they reserved their POTUS hate for ones in their living memory. No longer.
The most retrograde reactionaries among them even consider Abe Lincoln to be a Red.
Sheesh!
158 | freetoken Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:14:36am |
re: #156 iceweasel
Yeah... couldn't believe that Beck is bashing good ol' TR almost a century after his death.
The anarchist/atavist/revanchist crowd keeps rolling back the dates of the onset of the evil they dread, it seems to me. Used to be Nixon, or Johnson. Then it was Eisenhower, and of course FDR. Then back to Wilson, and now on to TR.
Their ultimate end of course is Lincoln, where they will find the mother load of Federal supremacy, and thus will declare that the Confederacy was right all along.
160 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:15:34am |
161 | cenotaphium Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:15:40am |
An opinion piece from Der Spiegel about the election results in Germany.
Interesting aside about the role of the Pirate Party winning some 2 percent of the overall vote (entry to government set at 5 percent).
162 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:16:06am |
re: #157 Salamantis
The most retrograde reactionaries among them even consider Abe Lincoln to be a Red.
Sheesh!
Which is like trotting out that old wheeze, "The Democrats founded the Klan, it's the Democrats who were always the party hostile to black people..."
Yikes. BTW, agree with you that DoughBob LoadPants and his oxymoronically titled book Liberal Fascism is the source for the recent spread of this sentiment.
163 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:16:57am |
164 | SixDegrees Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:17:27am |
re: #158 freetoken
Yeah... couldn't believe that Beck is bashing good ol' TR almost a century after his death.
The anarchist/atavist/revanchist crowd keeps rolling back the dates of the onset of the evil they dread, it seems to me. Used to be Nixon, or Johnson. Then it was Eisenhower, and of course FDR. Then back to Wilson, and now on to TR.
Their ultimate end of course is Lincoln, where they will find the mother load of Federal supremacy, and thus will declare that the Confederacy was right all along.
Roosevelt hatred is easy to understand; he put the nation on the path to being a superpower, advocating global projection of American influence - anathema to the isolationist Birchers.
This is, of course, an enormous oversimplification. But that's not surprising, given who we're talking about.
165 | bloodnok Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:18:25am |
166 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:18:28am |
re: #162 iceweasel
Which is like trotting out that old wheeze, "The Democrats founded the Klan, it's the Democrats who were always the party hostile to black people..."
Yikes. BTW, agree with you that DoughBob LoadPants and his oxymoronically titled book Liberal Fascism is the source for the recent spread of this sentiment.
They conveniently forget to mention that when Nixon pushed his Southern Strategy, complete with 'law and order' code words, that the Dixiecrats mass migrated to the Repubs, and the Solid South became solid for the other party...
167 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:20:34am |
re: #158 freetoken
Their ultimate end of course is Lincoln, where they will find the mother load of Federal supremacy, and thus will declare that the Confederacy was right all along.
I honestly think that's what will happen. It makes Charles' recent focus on the links so many of the people currently controlling the right have to white supremacist groups even more relevant.
Not that it isn't relevant anyway, but I think in a couple of months the wingnutsphere will arrive at that motherload, and people on the centre and left and in the MSM are going to see that LGF was stunningly prescient.
I have to say I expected the crazy to be brought when we elected a black man POTUS, but this freakout has completely exceeded everything I expected. I can't believe we're already at this level of violent and dangerous derangement.
168 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:20:38am |
re: #164 SixDegrees
Roosevelt hatred is easy to understand; he put the nation on the path to being a superpower, advocating global projection of American influence - anathema to the isolationist Birchers.
This is, of course, an enormous oversimplification. But that's not surprising, given who we're talking about.
They also fail to mention that Charles Lindbergh and his isolationist America First! party were good friends of the Reich...
169 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:25:41am |
re: #167 iceweasel
As it has been said here... It is not that we elected a black man POTUS. It is that we elected that black man POTUS.
That's what it is for me, anyway.
170 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:26:17am |
re: #167 iceweasel
I honestly think that's what will happen. It makes Charles' recent focus on the links so many of the people currently controlling the right have to white supremacist groups even more relevant.
Not that it isn't relevant anyway, but I think in a couple of months the wingnutsphere will arrive at that motherload, and people on the centre and left and in the MSM are going to see that LGF was stunningly prescient.
BTW, one sign of this is that the wingnutsphere chose RSM, of all people, as their confederate flag to rally around in decrying CJ's alleged apostasy.
Look, they were doomed to cast him out, eventually-- because he won't join in on the Full Metal Wingnut Freakout of each madeup issue. They were already angry and pissed. look at the climate of the party itself-- everyone is declared a RINO and driven out.
But picking RSM as their breaking point? Their last stand?
That says something really, really bad about where the right blogosphere, and the general mood of the right, is headed.
171 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:27:42am |
172 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:28:38am |
re: #169 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
As it has been said here... It is not that we elected a black man POTUS. It is that we elected that black man POTUS.
That's what it is for me, anyway.
Oh definitely FBV-- I'm not speaking of the people who have normal, legitimate, sane criticisms of Obama, or the people who never liked or supported him. I'm only talking about the lunatic racist fringe of the right.
You don't like Obama, but it has nothing at all to do with him being black. Of course!
173 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:29:48am |
re: #171 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Ever read "The Plot Against America" by Phillip Roth?
Scary shit.
No, but it looks good.
174 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:31:08am |
re: #173 Salamantis
It is really a good book. I'm assuming you Wiki'd it. if you intend on reading it, Don't read the Wiki! It'll mess the book up completely for you.
175 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:31:47am |
re: #174 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
It is really a good book. I'm assuming you Wiki'd it. if you intend on reading it, Don't read the Wiki! It'll mess the book up completely for you.
No, I just checked out the Amazon reviews.
176 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:35:21am |
A book that I found to be interesting was Lammas Night by Katherine Kurtz.
177 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:40:13am |
Just finished two books I thoroughly enjoyed (only read fiction), Blasphemy by Douglas Preston (Super Colliders, God, Scientific Zealots, Religious Zealots, and the Gubmint) and just finished "Marine One" by James Huston (President is killed in a helicopter crash, lawyers and stuff).
I recommend both for those who enjoy fiction.
178 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:43:25am |
Lammas Night is fiction - or is it? It's a supposed WW II history of the Magickal Battle of Britain - the astral struggle between the English Witches and the German Thulists to prevent the long-planned Nazi invasion of Great Britain.
It's OOP, but used copies can be found through:
[Link: used.addall.com...]
181 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:05:20am |
re: #180 irish rose
Good morning, lizards.
Good morning, {Rose}. I just arrived in the thread myself. Looks like it's been quite a weekend.
182 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:08:52am |
Looks like it.
Everyone either sleeping in or off to work already.
185 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:14:23am |
re: #182 Irish Rose
Looks like it.
Everyone either sleeping in or off to work already.
Indeed it does. Wow. Although to be honest, I prefer the quiet to the rather heated flamewars that have sprung up here on occasion.
187 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:20:20am |
How is everyone this morning.
Hey Rose, are you feeling any better? I am just a little better, but just wiped out. And I have to get on a plane this afternoon for a week long trip. Don't want to go!
188 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:23:54am |
Morning, all. Crazy busy but good family weekend.
189 | TheRealThing Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:26:44am |
Well you guys talk of flame wars our work handing out notice of default does not endear you that much with a 6 month behind borrower.
We do cause the upset. What is the cause of the flame wars here?
I have lurked some but not that much. It seems from my limited exposure that lack of negotiating skills cause many of the problems here and in our work. Just my experience in my field any how.
There are so many diverse opinions that consensus is hard to obtain.
Just a new posters small contribution.
190 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:31:44am |
re: #6 reine.de.tout
weet dreams, ggt.
So I have a cold, and I crashed this afternoon and napped, and now I can't sleep, and the place is empty.
*sigh*
I crashed yesterday afternoon and didn't wake up until my alarm went off this morning.
In bed.
191 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:33:02am |
re: #189 TheRealThing
Good point. Flame ups happen when people are not looking for consensus; they are looking to be right.
People think they are right by yelling the loudest and longest.
192 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:34:38am |
re: #191 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Good point. Flame ups happen when people are not looking for consensus; they are looking to be right.
People think they are right by yelling the loudest and longest.
And when some people forget the GAZE function.
193 | Darth Vader Gargoyle Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:35:45am |
re: #117 BryQan
Welcome to another Sailor! I'm stationed in Mayport.
194 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:36:27am |
re: #193 rwdflynavy
Welcome to another Sailor! I'm stationed in Mayport.
I was a plank owner in HSL-36 there.
195 | Darth Vader Gargoyle Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:38:37am |
re: #194 Salamantis
I was a plank owner in HSL-36 there.
Awesome! I'm at HSL-44 and was in the second to last FRS Class at HSL-30. Spent about 9 months at HSL-32 before I transitioned to the SH-60B.
196 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:39:52am |
re: #195 rwdflynavy
Awesome! I'm at HSL-44 and was in the second to last FRS Class at HSL-30. Spent about 9 months at HSL-32 before I transitioned to the SH-60B.
Back when I was in we were still flying the H-2 Seasprites.
197 | Darth Vader Gargoyle Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:40:42am |
re: #196 Salamantis
Back when I was in we were still flying the H-2 Seasprites.
Yep, Got about 300 hours in the SH-2F between 30 and 32.
198 | Flyers1974 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:44:21am |
re: #189 TheRealThing
Well you guys talk of flame wars our work handing out notice of default does not endear you that much with a 6 month behind borrower.
We do cause the upset. What is the cause of the flame wars here?
I have lurked some but not that much. It seems from my limited exposure that lack of negotiating skills cause many of the problems here and in our work. Just my experience in my field any how.
There are so many diverse opinions that consensus is hard to obtain.
Just a new posters small contribution.
Politics makes people insane.
199 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:46:15am |
re: #187 VioletTiger
How is everyone this morning.
Hey Rose, are you feeling any better? I am just a little better, but just wiped out. And I have to get on a plane this afternoon for a week long trip. Don't want to go!
Not really.
The flu is pretty much over with, but I'm emotionally drained. Having a very hard time getting past what some of my former friends have done. The betrayal and duplicity is just shocking.
I'm so down that I'm considering taking an internet hiatus, away from everyone and everything.
200 | TheRealThing Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:47:23am |
Not that much experience with politics. Do have negotiation knowledge.
Now off to the freeways and work to use that knowledge.
201 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:50:45am |
Okay, where is everyone this morning?
Anybody seen Old Line Texan lately? What about AuggieMagpie?
202 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:54:12am |
203 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:54:38am |
204 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:56:18am |
Heavy rain and very high winds here, and the temperature is dropping like a rock. Conditions are expected to deteriorate throughout the day.
Time to put away the shorts and get out the sweaters.
205 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:57:13am |
re: #204 Irish Rose
Heavy rain and very high winds here, and the temperature is dropping like a rock. Conditions are expected to deteriorate throughout the day.
Time to put away the shorts and get out the sweaters.
Flannel sheets yet?
206 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 5:58:47am |
207 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:00:34am |
208 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:00:47am |
209 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:01:27am |
re: #204 Irish Rose
Heavy rain and very high winds here, and the temperature is dropping like a rock. Conditions are expected to deteriorate throughout the day.
Time to put away the shorts and get out the sweaters.
Not getting the rain here in the north country, but definitely very windy and the day dawned dark and threatening at about 50 degrees. I turned the heater on in the truck for the first time this season. I suspect the house won't be far behind, so I guess I should get the windows repaired this week and get them reinstalled.
210 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:02:31am |
re: #204 Irish Rose
Heavy rain and very high winds here, and the temperature is dropping like a rock. Conditions are expected to deteriorate throughout the day.
Time to put away the shorts and get out the sweaters.
This is the last nice day we will have for a while. Rain tonight, and much cooler fall conditions. I picked the last of the ripe tomatoes and eggplants yesterday, and made the last batch of pesto.
Of course, it will be sweltering hot where I am going for the week (Texas)
211 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:04:39am |
re: #210 VioletTiger
This is the last nice day we will have for a while. Rain tonight, and much cooler fall conditions. I picked the last of the ripe tomatoes and eggplants yesterday, and made the last batch of pesto.Of course, it will be sweltering hot where I am going for the week (Texas)
So you're one of those brainwashed people who believes that eggplants are edible? It's all a conspiracy...
212 | reine.de.tout Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:05:50am |
re: #210 VioletTiger
This is the last nice day we will have for a while. Rain tonight, and much cooler fall conditions. I picked the last of the ripe tomatoes and eggplants yesterday, and made the last batch of pesto.
Of course, it will be sweltering hot where I am going for the week (Texas)
I love eggplant! And fresh tomatoes.
Here in La., we have a cool front coming through - will be 93 today, 85 tomorrow. (in other words, still hot)
213 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:06:06am |
Cold, windy and raining cats and dogs.
*sigh*
214 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:08:27am |
re: #206 Irish Rose
Not yet, but I'm down with the heavy blankets.
There's a fantastic pun in there but I'm eider too tired or too stressed to make it.
216 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:09:41am |
re: #213 Spare O'Lake
Cold, windy and raining cats and dogs.
*sigh*
Gonna' go splash in some poodles?
217 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:11:55am |
re: #214 MandyManners
There's a fantastic pun in there but I'm eider too tired or too stressed to make it.
*groan*
You couldn't duck your responsibility just this once, could you?
218 | Ray in TX Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:14:18am |
re: #89 iceweasel
I don't think so, FT. Check out the section I linked about Bayes Theorem. Every one of the possible outcomes of those flips has a 1 in 31,556,926 possibility of happening. That applies to the one where it's 50/50 as well as to the one where it's all heads.
But there would be a huge cluster right around the midpoint, I think, covering a whole lot of outcomes close to the 50/50 mark. We really need someone who's in math or up on this. Ludwig probably knows.
It would be a Gaussian distribution (bell curve). There would be a peak at .5, but it would be gradual, not sharp.
219 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:14:36am |
re: #210 VioletTiger
I picked the last of the ripe tomatoes and eggplants yesterday, and made the last batch of pesto.
The last tomatoes of the season, so sad.
I love gardening and it's always a downer to me to have to put the garden away for the winter. Sweetie knows it, and he's gifting me with all of the equipment that I need to satisfy my passion for gardening indoors this winter... heating mats, grow lights, heat lamps, self-watering pots, seedling trays, the whole shebang.
I figure I'll keep some herbs and flowers going over the winter and come late January, I'll order seeds and start my seedlings indoors.
I'm also developing an interest in hydroponics.
I may decide to set up a single unit under heat lamps, and give it a go.
220 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:15:18am |
re: #216 MandyManners
Gonna' go splash in some poodles?
Da dog took off so now I'll have to retriever.
221 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:15:27am |
re: #211 JamesTKirk
So you're one of those brainwashed people who believes that eggplants are edible? It's all a conspiracy...
Fried eggplant is one of my comfort foods.
Yes, really.
222 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:16:35am |
re: #217 thedopefishlives
*groan*
You couldn't duck your responsibility just this once, could you?
I could try to wing it.
223 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:19:21am |
224 | KenJen Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:19:26am |
re: #219 Irish Rose
I grew asparagus beans in my garden this year. They are incredible. The longest one was 3 and a half feet. Great for stir-fry. Getting ready to plant spinach and lettuce today a little late but with this global warming thing I figure I have got a shot.
225 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:19:47am |
re: #199 Irish Rose
I can almost bet you that any analyst would tell you that would be a good idea. I'd miss you, and wouldn't want to you stay gone for too long, but a week away from the keyboard might do you a bit of health.
226 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:20:48am |
Not sure if ya'll saw this yesterday so I'm reposting it again this morning.
From HuffPo (not going to link)
Tea Party Founder Announces: "A Huffington Post Of Our Own"
Eric Odom, founder of American Liberty Alliance (ALA), the group that launched and organized the tea party movement across the country, announced Friday what he calls a movement-minded news portal and his answer to the the Huffington Post. While the domain and branding are secret for now, Odom has given his news portal a temporary name, Project 73.
It's going to get a lot worse before it gets better.
227 | Danny Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:21:38am |
re: #221 Irish Rose
Fried eggplant is one of my comfort foods.
Yes, really.
I like them grilled with olive oil brushed on them.
228 | KenJen Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:21:44am |
re: #223 MandyManners
Just be nice and don't boxer.
If the dog catcher gets her we'll just have to Springer from the pound.
229 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:22:17am |
re: #225 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
I can almost bet you that any analyst would tell you that would be a good idea. I'd miss you, and wouldn't want to you stay gone for too long, but a week away from the keyboard might do you a bit of health.
I'm no analyst, but speaking from personal experience, this tends to be true. I've been a member of a lot of online communities, even run a few, and had some people I considered real friends just plain vanish or outright flounce. The fact that flouncers are usually "in the wrong" doesn't necessarily make it easier to take, so when it starts to get to be too much, I take a long weekend and go somewhere with the Mrs. Fish. Usually serves pretty well.
230 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:22:19am |
re: #224 KenJen
I grew asparagus beans in my garden this year. They are incredible. The longest one was 3 and a half feet. Great for stir-fry. Getting ready to plant spinach and lettuce today a little late but with this global warming thing I figure I have got a shot.
Very short growth period, you should be able to sneak some in and get a decent crop. Radishes too, perhaps.
231 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:24:03am |
re: #228 KenJen
Will we have to "pinscher" from the pound?
233 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:28:06am |
re: #228 KenJen
If the dog catcher gets her we'll just have to Springer from the pound.
I'll get my bichon and pitch a fit.
234 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:28:51am |
re: #232 badger1970
Are those puns copyrighted?
It's Charles' site but I doubt he'd want to own the puns.
236 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:31:43am |
re: #219 Irish Rose
The last tomatoes of the season, so sad.
I love gardening and it's always a downer to me to have to put the garden away for the winter. Sweetie knows it, and he's gifting me with all of the equipment that I need to satisfy my passion for gardening indoors this winter... heating mats, grow lights, heat lamps, self-watering pots, seedling trays, the whole shebang.
I figure I'll keep some herbs and flowers going over the winter and come late January, I'll order seeds and start my seedlings indoors.
I'm also developing an interest in hydroponics.
I may decide to set up a single unit under heat lamps, and give it a go.
I took some cutting of basil and other plants last night. They will join about 200 or so other houseplants. Botanical garden, here!
237 | bluecheese Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:32:24am |
Good morning to you all.
I just signed up yesterday.
I found out about the place over in orange land. Someone posted in a comment the LGF definition of "nirthers" over there, and that made me curious about the place. So I've been looking in through the window for a few weeks now, and took the opportunity to come in the door yesterday.
My political views come from the left more often than not. None-the-less I've noticed that there are a lot of smart people lizards (heh) here, and figured if I was able to comment I might learn a thing or two.
Anyway, top o the mornin' to everyone.
238 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:32:35am |
239 | KenJen Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:33:32am |
re: #236 VioletTiger
I'm going to make pesto with the rest of my basil. It's really easy. You can pour the pesto into ice cube trays and freeze it for use all winter.
240 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:33:38am |
re: #227 Danny
I like them grilled with olive oil brushed on them.
Eggplant parmesan. I make my mother's recipe. It is outta this world.
241 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:34:04am |
re: #237 bluecheese
Mornin'. You're welcome here no matter your political affiliation, so long as you speak rationally with evidence and don't troll.
242 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:34:37am |
re: #237 bluecheese
Good morning to you all.
I just signed up yesterday.
I found out about the place over in orange land. Someone posted in a comment the LGF definition of "nirthers" over there, and that made me curious about the place. So I've been looking in through the window for a few weeks now, and took the opportunity to come in the door yesterday.
My political views come from the left more often than not. None-the-less I've noticed that there are a lot of smart
peoplelizards (heh) here, and figured if I was able to comment I might learn a thing or two.Anyway, top o the mornin' to everyone.
Good morning, bluecheese... welcome!
243 | badger1970 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:35:06am |
re: #237 bluecheese
I second #241's comments. Welcome and good morning.
244 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:35:18am |
re: #231 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Will we have to "pinscher" from the pound?
Hopefully they won't charge us the newfie.
245 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:35:43am |
re: #237 bluecheese
Welcome, and good morning all. Oh a dog pun thread, ha. MM, you hound the lab for those H1N1 resullts yet? How is the kid doing?
246 | bluecheese Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:36:42am |
247 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:36:52am |
re: #237 bluecheese
Don't ever forget turn gave you your first karma point! :.) I always learn something here, really smart people.
248 | KenJen Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:37:04am |
re: #245 turn
Welcome, and good morning all. Oh a dog pun thread, ha. MM, you hound the lab for those H1N1 resullts yet? How is the kid doing?
turn! Long time no see. How have you been?
249 | spinmore Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:39:17am |
Capturing a fugitive from justice, and holding him under an agreement between the Swiss and US - This some French believe shows the 'scary' side of America. This is the same country that didn't want to 'give up' Ira Einhorn (sp?) the guy who kept his murdered 'girl friend' in a steamer trunk in his closet before fleeing to France. What do 'the French' really believe? Let's not forget 'Oil For Food' and Saddam - blowing-up The Rainbow Warrior, . . . yet given the chance they (the French) would frame Lance Armstrong in a heart beat. (?) go figure. (Yes, I know these are sweeping generalizations) But let's get real . . .
I feel much better now - Thanks
250 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:39:21am |
re: #240 VioletTiger
Eggplant Parmesan. I make my mother's recipe. It is outta this world.
bbq eggplant whole until steaming, scrape innards into bowl - add butter, garlic, Parmesan cheese and a dash of red wine vinegar. yum!
251 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:39:45am |
252 | bluecheese Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:40:09am |
re: #247 turn
Don't ever forget turn gave you your first karma point!
Thanks.
Does the karma mean anything at this place?
253 | KenJen Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:40:50am |
re: #245 turn
Welcome, and good morning all. Oh a dog pun thread, ha. MM, you hound the lab for those H1N1 resullts yet? How is the kid doing?
If I know MM she is curled up infront of the computer with an Afghan around her shoulders sipping coffee.
254 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:40:51am |
255 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:41:12am |
re: #251 MandyManners
That would be Border line crazy.
They don't collie me crazy for nothing
Speaking of, where's Ym o hyd?.
256 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:41:18am |
re: #245 turn
Welcome, and good morning all. Oh a dog pun thread, ha. MM, you hound the lab for those H1N1 resullts yet? How is the kid doing?
He's no longer as sick as a dog.
257 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:41:39am |
re: #252 bluecheese
Thanks.
Does the karma mean anything at this place?
Generally speaking, it's an indication of how favored you are among the community. People with high good karma either make insightful posts or are suckups. (You know who you are. ;) People with high bad karma are generally trolls - we keep some here at LGF as pets.
258 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:42:13am |
re: #248 KenJen
turn! Long time no see. How have you been?
Hey {Jen}, yeah I've actually had to work a lot lately. I'm doing well, just popped in to check things out before I get back to it. I did have a few days vacation at the beach here in CA week before last then traveled to Rehoboth Beach DE on business last week. Man it makes me sick Real, 3W and the rest of the old gand got preemtively banned here/
259 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:42:34am |
re: #249 spinmore
Capturing a fugitive from justice, and holding him under an agreement between the Swiss and US - This some French believe shows the 'scary' side of America. This is the same country that didn't want to 'give up' Ira Einhorn (sp?) the guy who kept his murdered 'girl friend' in a steamer trunk in his closet before fleeing to France. What do 'the French' really believe? Let's not forget 'Oil For Food' and Saddam - blowing-up The Rainbow Warrior, . . . yet given the chance they (the French) would frame Lance Armstrong in a heart beat. (?) go figure. (Yes, I know these are sweeping generalizations) But let's get real . . .
I feel much better now - Thanks
Talking about Polanski?
260 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:42:49am |
The Big Lake is in a pissy Autumn mood today, 12-15 foot waves.
[Link: www.surfgrandhaven.com...]
Thinking I might go down to the lighthouse for some close up shots today, if I can stay on my feet long enough to take 'em.
261 | bluecheese Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:43:54am |
re: #257 thedopefishlives
Generally speaking, it's an indication of how favored you are among the community. People with high good karma either make insightful posts or are suckups. (You know who you are. ;) People with high bad karma are generally trolls - we keep some here at LGF as pets.
Is it possible to see someone's karma?
262 | KenJen Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:44:30am |
re: #258 turn
Really? Whoa! What happened? I haven't been around much lately. Got laid off and then went to FL for vacation.
263 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:44:40am |
re: #252 bluecheese
Thanks.
Does the karma mean anything at this place?
To some, yes they like and even thrive on it. Some downding people they disagree with ... you be the judge.
264 | spinmore Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:44:53am |
re: #259 MandyManners
Yes - and forgive my reactionary Rant (my gut more than my brain)
265 | The Sanity Inspector Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:45:32am |
Flying close to the water, Abramson watched the whitecaps pass rapidly
beneath him. The war in the Pacific was a seducing war indeed. He
had gazed out over the miles upon miles of open water, which was deep
blue and spectacularly beautiful. He marveled at God's work in the
breathtaking beauty of the cloud formations that jutted into the sky.
It was hard to believe that a war was taking place. There were none
of the signs of war one might see on land, no shattered buildings or
bombed out villages. There were no craters and twisted railroad
tracks or burned vehicles pushed to the side of the road--lifeless
relics of earlier battles. There wer no fields with rows of white
crosses interspersed with Stars of David. There was just water, the
sun, and the crystal-clear majesty from 20,000 feet.Even in aerial combat, he realized, the killing was sanitized. In a
small, cylinder-shaped space rising from the water to 15,000 feet,
aircraft would swirl and dive in a ballet of death. Planes and pilots
plunged inside this cylinder, often to their flaming deaths, but when
the dogfight was over, the area was again peaceful and serene--no
broken aircraft or bodies littering the battlefield--just the Pacific
Ocean in all its beauty.-- Ronald J. Drez, Twenty-five Yards of War: The extraordinary courage
of ordinary men in World War II, 2001
266 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:45:48am |
I tend to ignore my karma score. Up or down, doesn't really matter to me one way or another.
267 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:45:56am |
re: #256 MandyManners
He's no longer as sick as a dog.
Glad to hear that in his case the H1N1's bark was bigger than it's bite ...
268 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:46:23am |
re: #261 bluecheese
Is it possible to see someone's karma?
Click on their avatar. I wouldn't worry too much about it; a lot of times, trolls make a habit of downdinging everyone they disagree with (or everyone in a thread, period), so it's not like you're going to get banned if it's really low or whatever. Charles only cares that you obey the rules.
269 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:46:42am |
re: #264 spinmore
Yes - and forgive my reactionary Rant (my gut more than my brain)
No need for an apology. It's sad that some of the same people who think it's horrible what certain priests are accused of are more than happy to look the other way when someone in Hollywood does the exact same thing.
If it's wrong, it's wrong, regardless of who does it.
270 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:47:01am |
re: #255 Spenser (with an S)
Speaking of, where's Ym o hyd?.
I've been wondering that too spenser, I really miss her. I hope she and Madame are doing ok ...
271 | bluecheese Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:48:10am |
re: #268 thedopefishlives
Click on their avatar. I wouldn't worry too much about it; a lot of times, trolls make a habit of downdinging everyone they disagree with (or everyone in a thread, period), so it's not like you're going to get banned if it's really low or whatever. Charles only cares that you obey the rules.
Ok. thanks.
I guess I don't see much value to it. Oh well.
272 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:48:41am |
Out browsing the internet today, wow.
The anti-LGF attack machine just never lets up.
273 | KenJen Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:49:04am |
re: #267 turn
Glad to hear that in his case the H1N1's bark was bigger than it's bite ...
Mandy is a great Heeler.
274 | KenJen Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:49:54am |
re: #271 bluecheese
Ok. thanks.
I guess I don't see much value to it. Oh well.
You should. Karma points will be worth more than the Dollar soon.//
275 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:50:14am |
re: #253 KenJen
If I know MM she is curled up infront of the computer with an Afghan around her shoulders sipping coffee.
Probably, but what I fear most about MM is if she looses her house who is going to schnauzer?
276 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:50:35am |
re: #274 KenJen
You should. Karma points will be worth more than the Dollar soon.//
My belly button lint is going to be worth more than the dollar soon.
I'm already using it to finance the US Navel Department.
277 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:50:35am |
278 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:50:41am |
279 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:51:03am |
re: #272 Irish Rose
Out browsing the internet today, wow.
The anti-LGF attack machine just never lets up.
I'm reminded of an old Calvin and Hobbes strip: "A good compromise leaves everybody mad." Well, except I'm sure Charles isn't mad, per se. Unhappy that more people don't see reason, perhaps.
280 | bluecheese Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:51:33am |
re: #274 KenJen
You should. Karma points will be worth more than the Dollar soon.//
heh.
It's hard to see good things in the future where it concerns the value of the dollar.
281 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:51:49am |
re: #258 turn
Hey {Jen}, yeah I've actually had to work a lot lately. I'm doing well, just popped in to check things out before I get back to it. I did have a few days vacation at the beach here in CA week before last then traveled to Rehoboth Beach DE on business last week. Man it makes me sick Real, 3W and the rest of the old gand got preemtively banned here/
turn, how the hell did you end that with a sarc tag? jeeze it couldn't be further from sarc my friends
282 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:52:00am |
re: #264 spinmore
Yes - and forgive my reactionary Rant (my gut more than my brain)
Strange coincidence that Susan Atkins died last week.
283 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:52:28am |
re: #272 Irish Rose
Out browsing the internet today, wow.
The anti-LGF attack machine just never lets up.
Presumably that requires constant vigilance by the anti-anti-LGF attack machine machines. (Did I say that right?) Anyway, I should make you a special badge for your avatar.
284 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:52:40am |
285 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:53:17am |
Well folks, I'm out for a while. I have a list of things that need doing and I start classes this afternoon.
Later.
286 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:53:23am |
re: #262 KenJen
Really? Whoa! What happened? I haven't been around much lately. Got laid off and then went to FL for vacation.
I'll go back and find the post ... brb
287 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:53:57am |
re: #283 JamesTKirk
Presumably that requires constant vigilance by the anti-anti-LGF attack machine machines. (Did I say that right?) Anyway, I should make you a special badge for your avatar.
What did you have in mind?
289 | badger1970 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:55:41am |
re: #279 thedopefishlives
A comic strip ended too soon. For some reason it reminded me of that Buster Keaton film where his walking between the battle lines during the civil war with flags on the Union and the Confederacy sewed so each side faced their respective lines, then the wind shifted...
290 | KenJen Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:56:03am |
291 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:57:30am |
re: #287 Irish Rose
What did you have in mind?
I dunno. Standard badge outline, title across the top, your name and a number at the bottom, and a logo in the middle. The text wouldn't be legible at the small size, but the badge shape and logo optimally should be.
The logo would be either be some kind of symbol representing the opposition with a nope score (red circle and slash) over it, or perhaps a lizard with a set of binoculars indicating the aforementioned constant vigilance.
This is off the top of my head. The color scheme would be metallic, but with green for the text and whatever colors the logo is for the logo.
292 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:58:05am |
293 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:58:10am |
re: #267 turn
Glad to hear that in his case the H1N1's bark was bigger than it's bite ...
Oh, the bark was rabid enough.
296 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 6:59:27am |
re: #289 badger1970
[Calvin & Hobbes] A comic strip ended too soon...
This is true; but in some ways that's much better than a strip which lives on long past its welcome.
297 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:00:22am |
re: #294 Spare O'Lake
All these dog puns are giving me paws
Don't diss dogs. They will be instrumental in leading us into the color-blind society of the future.
Unless they're distracted by squirrels.
298 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:00:24am |
re: #262 KenJen
Really? Whoa! What happened? I haven't been around much lately. Got laid off and then went to FL for vacation.
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]
299 | KenJen Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:00:52am |
300 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:02:05am |
re: #296 JamesTKirk
This is true; but in some ways that's much better than a strip which lives on long past its welcome.
This is true in general as much as it is for cartoons.
301 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:02:11am |
re: #291 JamesTKirk
I dunno. Standard badge outline, title across the top, your name and a number at the bottom, and a logo in the middle. The text wouldn't be legible at the small size, but the badge shape and logo optimally should be.
The logo would be either be some kind of symbol representing the opposition with a nope score (red circle and slash) over it, or perhaps a lizard with a set of binoculars indicating the aforementioned constant vigilance.
This is off the top of my head. The color scheme would be metallic, but with green for the text and whatever colors the logo is for the logo.
I like it :).
302 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:02:53am |
303 | Guanxi88 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:03:34am |
re: #296 JamesTKirk
This is true; but in some ways that's much better than a strip which lives on long past its welcome.
Yes, nothing more painful than to have to endure that which is done before it is through.
304 | KenJen Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:03:50am |
re: #298 turn
Thanks turn. I'm completely shocked. Really don't know what to say.
305 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:04:59am |
re: #304 KenJen
Thanks turn. I'm completely shocked. Really don't know what to say.
I've talked to real, it's really unfrickingbelievable. ok need to get some work done, be back at break.
306 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:05:19am |
re: #297 JamesTKirk
Don't diss dogs. They will be instrumental in leading us into the color-blind society of the future.
Unless they're distracted by squirrels.
Or, stop to lick their ohnevermind
307 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:06:14am |
308 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:06:22am |
309 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:06:32am |
310 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:07:14am |
re: #271 bluecheese
Ok. thanks.
I guess I don't see much value to it. Oh well.
Karma is a strategy employed by many webmasters and forum owners. It functions as a way for the community to police itself, and lessens the need for moderators.
Karma doesn't actually mean anything. Good posters can wind up with very bad karma in an unhealthy web community, because other people gang up on them and downding them. Likewise, bad posters can have a high karma.
The best thing to do about karma, as a poster and not a webmaster, is to adopt a bipartisan strategy:
Be a liberal when it comes to giving out updings:do so freely, often, and generously--especially including to people who disagree with you so long as they did it in a really cogent way, a way that made you laugh, a way that made you think.
be a fiscal conservative when it comes to downdinging people: judiciously, rarely, and with great deliberation.
And about your own, be like politicians on both sides when it comes to the budget: don't look at it or worry about it, never ask where it came from or where it's going.
My karma philosophy.
311 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:07:28am |
312 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:07:55am |
313 | Guanxi88 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:08:28am |
re: #310 iceweasel
Exactly. Throw around up-dings like a hip-hopper does $100.00 bills in their videos. Don't be the guy running around trying to pick them up.
314 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:09:37am |
re: #310 iceweasel
I don't agree one bit with that karma philosophy, downding! :.)
315 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:10:33am |
re: #310 iceweasel
I have no desire to keep up a karma %, but I have noticed some down-dings on my posts after the fact by people who were not commenting at the time and who I don't even recognize, which I thought was a no-no.
316 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:11:19am |
re: #315 Spenser (with an S)
I have no desire to keep up a karma %, but I have noticed some down-dings on my posts after the fact by people who were not commenting at the time and who I don't even recognize, which I thought was a no-no.
Here you go.
318 | Guanxi88 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:12:47am |
re: #317 Jimmah
скворцы - вложение поздно в парке Горького в этом году ;-)
[Video]
Sweet with the cyrillic. Nice touch.
319 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:12:57am |
re: #315 Spenser (with an S)
I have no desire to keep up a karma %, but I have noticed some down-dings on my posts after the fact by people who were not commenting at the time and who I don't even recognize, which I thought was a no-no.
Stealth downdinging, not good ...
320 | BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:13:33am |
re: #305 turn
I've talked to real, it's really unfrickingbelievable. ok need to get some work done, be back at break.
Anyone know what happened to loppyd? I haven't seen any posts from her in a long time.
322 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:14:19am |
re: #320 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey
Anyone know what happened to loppyd? I haven't seen any posts from her in a long time.
No, a lot of lizards have gone missing ...
323 | Aye Pod Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:14:37am |
re: #318 Guanxi88
Sweet with the cyrillic. Nice touch.
Only just found out how to do it without it getting messed up!
324 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:16:00am |
re: #321 KenJen
Later guys. The library is kicking me out.
You can't sit there any longer, they won't let you stay? Speak up about it, don't just roll over. Come on jen. Bye bye
325 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:16:11am |
re: #316 MandyManners
Thanks, but I recognize you guys. What's an InghisKhan (sp)?
326 | Leonidas Hoplite Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:16:52am |
re: #320 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey
Anyone know what happened to loppyd? I haven't seen any posts from her in a long time.
She's been gone ahwile though I don't know the circumstances - I believe she set up her own blog
327 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:17:16am |
re: #315 Spenser (with an S)
I have no desire to keep up a karma %, but I have noticed some down-dings on my posts after the fact by people who were not commenting at the time and who I don't even recognize, which I thought was a no-no.
Yes. Karma is a webmaster's or forum owner's tool, and it's a very smart one. In a healthy web community, it greatly reduces the need for moderators.
Interestingly, individual posters get obsessed with it-- their karma and that of others. They start obsessively downdinging (sneakily) people they dislike. They obsess over their own karma level and that of others. They also assume everyone else must be likewise obsessed with karma.
One good way to track obsessives is to notice that they'll downding an 'enemy' for such acts as saying hello on a thread.
FWIW, for a while there every time I went 2 days or so without posting, my karma would plunge 200 or so points-- because of people going through old threads and sneakily downdinging old posts.
328 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:18:18am |
The dingosphere seems to have gone to the dogs.
329 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:18:30am |
re: #325 Spenser (with an S)
Thanks, but I recognize you guys. What's an InghisKhan (sp)?
AFAIK, a poster who also updings people. Not a sock.
330 | bloodnok Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:18:45am |
re: #315 Spenser (with an S)
I have no desire to keep up a karma %, but I have noticed some down-dings on my posts after the fact by people who were not commenting at the time and who I don't even recognize, which I thought was a no-no.
I'm not sure what the problem is with that. Downdinging is a part of the policing process if people are not employing good judgment in their posts or are exhibiting bad behavior. It can be done in a polite way -it doesn't have to be seen as an attack on the downdinged. If it is someone who has a vendetta, fair game for being derided for their dinging. But someone who does not post often has every right to disagree with me. If they choose to tell me why, fine. If not, that's okay too, they either disagree with me or just don't like me.
And also, one of the great things about the ding system is that it allows people who can't or shouldn't post from work to still have some kind of say in the conversation without tripping the sensors at their job. At least that's the way I see it. Which reminds me...what am I doing posting?
331 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:20:14am |
re: #325 Spenser (with an S)
Thanks, but I recognize you guys. What's an InghisKhan (sp)?
Next time you see it, use the search function. Type in "user:NAMEOFNIC". That should give you more information.
332 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:20:43am |
re: #305 turn
I've talked to real, it's really unfrickingbelievable. ok need to get some work done, be back at break.
There really is no excuse for it.
They're choosing to rub elbows with people who are stalking and abusing other LGF registrants... and their blogroll is full of sites that abuse Charles on a daily basis, sites like HA and Ace of Spades HQ.
It's backstabbing... nothing more, nothing less.
May God forgive them.
333 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:21:31am |
336 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:22:18am |
re: #330 bloodnok
The problem with "stealth dinging" is that a lot of people use it as a tool to express their trollish desires without blatantly flamebaiting. This is why Charles frequently bans people who habitually downding without posting.
338 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:23:27am |
re: #334 turn
In the case of real I'm pretty sure it was innocent Rose ...
No it wasn't, he knew what he was doing and has no regrets.
339 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:24:08am |
re: #334 turn
In the case of real I'm pretty sure it was innocent Rose ...
He lied to Hoops about why he wasn't here. LIED.
340 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:24:17am |
341 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:24:20am |
re: #331 MandyManners
Did you re-capture the kid yesterday? Nail the bedroom window shut and cut down the tree!!
How's he doing?
342 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:24:25am |
re: #337 Sharmuta
Why is everyone asking about people who hate LGF?
Morning, Shar. Some people in this thread are late to the party that we all attended at the beginning of the weekend. They wanted to know what happened, which sparked the current discussion.
343 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:25:55am |
re: #339 Sharmuta
He lied to Hoops about why he wasn't here. LIED.
Hey hoops, I see you are logged on. What's this all about? What did I miss here?
344 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:26:30am |
re: #341 sattv4u2
Did you re-capture the kid yesterday? Nail the bedroom window shut and cut down the tree!!
How's he doing?
Hey there u2, sup?
346 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:26:50am |
347 | bloodnok Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:27:06am |
re: #336 thedopefishlives
The problem with "stealth dinging" is that a lot of people use it as a tool to express their trollish desires without blatantly flamebaiting. This is why Charles frequently bans people who habitually downding without posting.
True, and those people are easy to spot. I guess I am talking more about the random poster that might be shy. Or the person who stumbles onto a thread after it dies and still wants to be involved.
We can't know everyone, and we can't expect everyone to post often enough so that we are familiar with them.
348 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:28:11am |
re: #346 Irish Rose
I emailed him and he couldn't be bothered to respond.
I spoke with him on Friday, I don't know what changed over the weekend ...
349 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:29:00am |
About the only thing Republicans and Democrats have agreed on is tapping up to $1.5 billion in federal recovery dollars to fill part of the $2.8 billion budget gap.
About the only thing Republicans and Democrats have agreed on is tapping up to $1.5 billion in federal recovery dollars to fill part of the $2.8 billion budget gap.
ex-industrial powerhouse, Michigan, considering shutting down...notice how they might use stimulus money...now called 'recovery' money...interesting
350 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:29:01am |
re: #343 turn
Hey hoops, I see you are logged on. What's this all about? What did I miss here?
Hoops posted that he'd had an email from realwest who was too tired from his medication to be at LGF- all while he was just fine to post at another site.
That's what I call lying. And worse- he got a kind, caring, decent man in Hoops to spread his lies unknowingly for him. That pisses me off. Hoops deserves better.
351 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:30:06am |
352 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:30:23am |
re: #341 sattv4u2
Did you re-capture the kid yesterday? Nail the bedroom window shut and cut down the tree!!
How's he doing?
Don't think I haven't thought of doing just those things! Mr. Cranky just wanted to get out and run around. I let him for a while but I did have a few choice words with him about climbing out of the window, walking on the roof and then climbing down that tree. He had a higher temperature last night so no school until tomorrow or maybe Wednesday. I hope the former. We're both going nuts.
353 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:31:21am |
354 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:31:37am |
re: #344 turn
Hey there u2, sup?
Another 12 hour day in paradise (work). At least it's a light day unlike yesterdays hell
How's by you
(you've got mail, btw)
355 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:32:46am |
re: #317 Jimmah
скворцы - вложение поздно в парке Горького в этом году ;-)
Рабочие мира, объединитесь! Мы не имеем ничего, чтобы потерять, но наши цепи!
356 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:34:31am |
[Link: www.washingtontimes.com...]
Afghanistan, where Americans are dying, just does not seem as important to BO as health care
[Link: www.washingtontimes.com...]
357 | bluecheese Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:34:56am |
re: #349 albusteve
About the only thing Republicans and Democrats have agreed on is tapping up to $1.5 billion in federal recovery dollars to fill part of the $2.8 billion budget gap.
About the only thing Republicans and Democrats have agreed on is tapping up to $1.5 billion in federal recovery dollars to fill part of the $2.8 billion budget gap.
ex-industrial powerhouse, Michigan, considering shutting down...notice how they might use stimulus money...now called 'recovery' money...interesting
Well, alot of the stimulus dollars came from tax cuts...
358 | turn Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:35:12am |
re: #354 sattv4u2
Another 12 hour day in paradise (work). At least it's a light day unlike yesterdays hell
How's by you(you've got mail, btw)
It's all good. Yeah, I should bail and get some work done too. bbl
360 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:36:13am |
re: #357 bluecheese
Well, alot of the stimulus dollars came from tax cuts...
how so?...the feds are broke
362 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:37:30am |
re: #357 bluecheese
Well, alot of the stimulus dollars came from tax cuts..
First, welcome. Second, what tax cuts?
363 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:38:54am |
re: #357 bluecheese
Well, alot of the stimulus dollars came from tax cuts...
Are you talking about the Bush tax cuts, the ones that will expire soon?
364 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:39:31am |
365 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:39:42am |
re: #361 Killgore Trout
Big jump in the Dow this morning.
After all the profit taking from the end of last week the investors are back putting that money in
367 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:40:39am |
re: #365 sattv4u2
After all the profit taking from the end of last week the investors are back putting that money in
Gotta' do something with it 'cause money doesn't grow when sitting still.
368 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:41:08am |
re: #357 bluecheese
Well, alot of the stimulus dollars came from tax cuts...
No it hasn't. The "stimulus money" is being printed out of whole cloth
369 | Dark_Falcon Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:41:18am |
Sorry about the drive by, but I've got to run. Just wanted to wish everyone a good morning.
370 | bluecheese Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:41:36am |
re: #360 albusteve
how so?...the feds are broke
Right, and they are now even more broke after cutting taxes - their revenue source.
Now they are in effect un-cutting taxes to make up the budget shortfall.
I think.
Does that make any sense?
371 | Killgore Trout Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:42:09am |
re: #365 sattv4u2
Obama Stock Advance Persists on Money Fund Hoarding
Americans holding $3.5 trillion in cash are giving money managers increasing confidence that the stock market rally under President Barack Obama will continue through the end of the year.Even after reducing money-market accounts by 11 percent this year, investors have cash equal to 73 percent of Standard & Poor’s 500 Index companies’ net assets, according to data compiled by the Investment Company Institute and Bloomberg. At the peak of the bull market in 2007, the measure of buying power was 62 percent.
It seems that a lot of people who have been sitting on cash are starting to put it in the market.
372 | reloadingisnotahobby Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:43:31am |
Dang!
I take a four day weekend just to come back to the office and
find that my JOB is still here!!
CRAP!!
First winter storm on it's way...
Hope it saves some snow for Walter!!;-)
373 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:44:05am |
re: #370 bluecheese
Right, and they are now even more broke after cutting taxes - their revenue source.
Now they are in effect un-cutting taxes to make up the budget shortfall.
I think.
Does that make any sense?
Actually, Fed revenues went UP (as they always do) AFTER the tax cuts
REASON
Cuts in taxes means investors have more money to (wait for it0 INVEST
They invest in companies, which hire more people making a larger pool of people that (wait for it again) PAY TAXES!
374 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:44:21am |
re: #370 bluecheese
Do you mean they have, in effect, cut the amount of $ coming into the treasury through their mis-handling of the economy? There haven't been any tax cuts per se.
375 | Bloodnok Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:44:30am |
Back later today, folks -unless the urge to post from work becomes too strong once again.
376 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:45:01am |
re: #369 Dark_Falcon
Sorry about the drive by, but I've got to run. Just wanted to wish everyone a good morning.
Backatcha'!
377 | badger1970 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:45:29am |
re: #373 sattv4u2
Supply-side (voodoo, Reagan-omics) or whatever the heck one calls it, WORKS EVERY SINGLE TIME IT'S TRIED!
378 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:45:43am |
re: #370 bluecheese
Right, and they are now even more broke after cutting taxes - their revenue source.
Now they are in effect un-cutting taxes to make up the budget shortfall.
I think.
Does that make any sense?
You mean, they're taking more of OUR money?
379 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:46:15am |
re: #371 Killgore Trout
Obama Stock Advance Persists on Money Fund Hoarding
It seems that a lot of people who have been sitting on cash are starting to put it in the market.
Not only that, but companies are starting to do more (Corporate dealmaking is boosting investors' hopes about a recovery in the economy)[Link: finance.yahoo.com...] instead of being conservative. When investors see that they jump in
380 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:46:30am |
re: #372 reloadingisnotahobby
Dang!
I take a four day weekend just to come back to the office and
find that my JOB is still here!!
CRAP!!
First winter storm on it's way...
Hope it saves some snow for Walter!!;-)
I'm gonna' teeelll lll!
381 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:47:21am |
private money is the only money that can stimulate the economy, not some phony balony fed, tax fueled, bombzilla bailout scam...doubling the deficit x two is exactly the wrong thing to do
382 | Leonidas Hoplite Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:47:24am |
383 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:48:06am |
re: #372 reloadingisnotahobby
Dang!
I take a four day weekend just to come back to the office and
find that my JOB is still here!!
CRAP!!
First winter storm on it's way...
Hope it saves some snow for Walter!!;-)
Thats one of the jobs Obama saved, right?
384 | Leonidas Hoplite Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:48:28am |
re: #381 albusteve
private money is the only money that can stimulate the economy, not some phony balony fed, tax fueled, bombzilla bailout scam...doubling the deficit x two is exactly the wrong thing to do
Hey it worked in Japan during the 1990's...oh, wait.
385 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:49:08am |
386 | Pullus Iulius Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:50:34am |
re: #383 sattv4u2
Thats one of the jobs Obama saved, right?
By current federal accounting principle, it's three or four of the ones saved.
387 | bluecheese Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:54:00am |
re: #368 sattv4u2
No it hasn't. The "stimulus money" is being printed out of whole cloth
See here
Likewise with the tax reductions in the stimulus – which collectively made up $288 billion, or about 37 percent of the package. Most of those tax cuts are targeted at individuals. And while the they aren’t terribly deep, they are impressively broad.
Also see here
According to the CBO, federal taxes will amount to just 15.5 percent of GDP this year. That’s 2.2 percent of GDP less than last year, 3.3 percent less than in 2007, and 1.8 percent less than the lowest percentage recorded during the Reagan years. If conservatives really believe their own rhetoric, they should be congratulating Obama for being one of the greatest tax cutters in history.
Conservatives will respond that some tax cuts are good while others are not. Determining which is which is based on something called supply-side economics. Because I was among those who developed it, I think I can speak authoritatively on the subject. According to the supply-side view, temporary tax cuts and tax credits are economically valueless. Only permanent cuts in marginal tax rates will significantly raise growth.
On this basis, we see that Bush’s tax cuts were pretty much the opposite of what supply-side economics would recommend. The vast bulk of his tax cuts involved tax rebates—which failed in 2001 and again in 2008, because the vast bulk of the money was saved—or tax credits that had no incentive effects. While marginal rates were cut slightly—the top rate fell from 39.6 percent to 35 percent—it was phased in slowly and never made permanent. Neither were Bush’s cuts in capital gains and dividend taxes.
Tax cuts mean less revenue. Using part of the stimulus to snip away that the ballooning debt is a prudent measure IMHO.
388 | reloadingisnotahobby Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:54:22am |
re: #380 MandyManners
I'm gonna' teeelll lll!
If Walter didn't like snow ...
why move to the nose bleed seats!!
I love snow...From a distance!!
Approx...1 or 2 thousand feet is good!
389 | Honorary Yooper Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:55:09am |
re: #327 iceweasel
Yes. Karma is a webmaster's or forum owner's tool, and it's a very smart one. In a healthy web community, it greatly reduces the need for moderators.
However, it's not foolproof. Look at Avanti. His karma went to -1000 before recovering. Then there's Space Jesus. He's the current king of negative karma, yet he's still very much around. Some commentors with highly positive karma have gotten the stick recently.
390 | bluecheese Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:55:14am |
re: #373 sattv4u2
Actually, Fed revenues went UP (as they always do) AFTER the tax cuts
REASON
Cuts in taxes means investors have more money to (wait for it0 INVESTThey invest in companies, which hire more people making a larger pool of people that (wait for it again) PAY TAXES!
link?
391 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:57:48am |
[Link: www.americanthinker.com...]
here comes Palin, crashing the party in 2012...pretty good read
392 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:58:03am |
re: #387 bluecheese
By "tax cuts", are you referring to the pre-emptive-give-backs-on-taxes-you-were-not-going-to-pay-this-year-anyway?
'Cause it's not the same thing.
393 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 7:58:58am |
394 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:01:13am |
395 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:02:21am |
One more post before I go:
I think that for some people, expecially shut-ins, their online relationships are everything to them... every bit as real as physical relationships.
When a friend is banned from a web community - for whatever reason - they're cut off from that friend. If it's a friendship that they've come to depend on, it's natural for the one left behind to want to go where that friend ends up, to maintain the relationship. And they're often willing to do anything that they have to do - and dismiss anything that they have to dismiss - to maintain that relationship. Even if it requires the dismissal of moral integrity and intellectual honesty .
This isn't the first time that I've seen shocking departures and irrational behavior here. I've seen some people leave this place because they didn't like seeing a friend banned, even though they know that the reason behind that banning was absolutely valid.
There's nothing you can do to prevent this kind of thing. People are often willing to defend and excuse behavior in their friends that they would not even hesitate to criticize in others.
That is all.
Time for class... have a good afternoon, folks.
396 | lurking faith Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:03:28am |
Not sure if this from below needs clean-up or is just incautiously worded:
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]
As I type, I think it's still watching that thread.
397 | Ray in TX Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:04:49am |
re: #394 MandyManners
That doesn't need a link. It's common sense.
Not really. You can find examples of fed revenues going up after taxes were cut, raised or left unchanged. There's a lot more affecting federal revenues that simply changes in the tax rate.
398 | ladycatnip Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:05:14am |
OT
This from India - Obama is ruining India's security climate
He may not relish the comparison but it is now becoming increasingly obvious that Mr Barack Obama is the most hostile American President for India since Richard Nixon. In the eight months he has been in office, Mr Obama has snubbed India more than once. He has sent repeated signals that New Delhi is not integral to his Asian security architecture. [snip]There has been a remarkable absence of clarity on Mr Obama’s strategic goals. In the early months, it was easy to pretend he was making up his mind. Now, it would seem he has no mind. His confusion on AfPak and constant shifting of tactical milestones would suggest he has little understanding of the nature of the challenge there and, behind those engaging phrases, is thoroughly confused. [snip]
He is completely out of his depth and will probably leave behind a dangerous and unsure legacy. India could have done without this neophyte.
This is the guy who campaigned on sitting down with our enemies and having a conversation with them - but he conveniently forgot to tell us he'd need a gargantuan bus with really big tires for our friends - UK, Israel, India.
399 | bluecheese Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:05:41am |
re: #393 sattv4u2
[Link: www.heritage.org...]
That link is only in regard to corporate tax receipts. Corporate taxes only make up 14 percent of total fed revenue.
Try again.
400 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:06:46am |
re: #397 Ray in TX
Not really. You can find examples of fed revenues going up after taxes were cut, raised or left unchanged. There's a lot more affecting federal revenues that simply changes in the tax rate.
A link please?
401 | JanglerNPL Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:07:00am |
Here's a chartfrom the Heritage Foundation purporting to prove that tax cuts increase revenue. But the fastest increase in revenue occurred between 1992ish and 2000, when taxes were *raised*. If the graph proves that tax cuts increase revenue, it also proves that tax increases increase revenue, and do a much better job of it.
I don't think the graph alone proves either proposition. It seems clear that revenues will increase most years regardless of government action, because of the general growth of the economy and the population.
402 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:07:28am |
Oh, dear me. Mr. Cranky has taken his mattress off his platform bed again. I have this urge to duct-tape him to the wall. For the day. bbl
403 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:08:50am |
re: #395 Irish Rose
Image: badge1.gif
404 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:09:41am |
re: #403 JamesTKirk
Heh.
Lighten up the lizard a bit and it's perfect.
405 | Leonidas Hoplite Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:09:42am |
re: #399 bluecheese
That link is only in regard to corporate tax receipts. Corporate taxes only make up 14 percent of total fed revenue.
Try again.
That's kinda interesting. 14% of revenue. Wow. Think of all the effort that goes into getting just 14% of revenue. Why not just eliminate corporate tax rates and reap the benefit of being the most favorable nation to operate in? All the jobs, investment, and tax reciepts...we could reduce unemployment and the deficit, maybe even buy everyone a second unicorn!
406 | Ray in TX Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:10:33am |
407 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:11:21am |
[Link: article.nationalreview.com...]
BO gets his ass fact checked...a review of his Important Health Care Speech to congress
408 | avanti Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:12:03am |
re: #391 albusteve
[Link: www.americanthinker.com...]
here comes Palin, crashing the party in 2012...pretty good read
By far the weakest candidate the GOP could field in 2012, a leftie wet dream.
409 | laZardo Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:12:26am |
Evening honcos.
With college cancelled across Manila for obvious weather-related reasons, I've been trying to find a place to volunteer to help ship out aid packages to affected residents but they're literally full up.
The high school my little bros used to attend should have some openings tomorrow...
410 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:12:39am |
re: #405 Leonidas Hoplite
That's kinda interesting. 14% of revenue. Wow. Think of all the effort that goes into getting just 14% of revenue. Why not just eliminate corporate tax rates and reap the benefit of being the most favorable nation to operate in? All the jobs, investment, and tax reciepts...we could reduce unemployment and the deficit, maybe even buy everyone a second unicorn!
blasphemy to a donk...they prefer the un real
411 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:13:16am |
re: #407 albusteve
BO gets his ass fact checked
I think that's racist... or maybe just mean... actually, it's a correct assessment of the situation. Never mind.
/
412 | Killgore Trout Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:13:18am |
re: #408 avanti
Joe the Plumber for VP!
/
413 | Leonidas Hoplite Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:13:18am |
re: #410 albusteve
blasphemy to a donk...they prefer the un real
Yes, the unreal is so much more convenient.
414 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:13:34am |
415 | laZardo Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:13:41am |
re: #398 ladycatnip
OT
This from India - Obama is ruining India's security climate
This is the guy who campaigned on sitting down with our enemies and having a conversation with them - but he conveniently forgot to tell us he'd need a gargantuan bus with really big tires for our friends - UK, Israel, India.
Gandhi-isms aside, India and Israel seem to be getting quite friendly, even officially.
416 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:13:47am |
417 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:14:06am |
re: #408 avanti
By far the weakest candidate the GOP could field in 2012, a leftie wet dream.
The weakest candidate the GOP could field in 2012 was John McCain.
418 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:14:14am |
re: #408 avanti
By far the weakest candidate the GOP could field in 2012, a leftie wet dream.
And yet she doesn't make them sublimely confident, just frothingly crazy.
Hhmm.
419 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:14:23am |
re: #408 avanti
By far the weakest candidate the GOP could field in 2012, a leftie wet dream.
then why is the left so afraid of her?...or is their vitriol just an expression of unfounded rudeness?...which way is it?
420 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:15:17am |
421 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:15:24am |
re: #419 albusteve
See my #418. Great minds and all that...
422 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:16:24am |
423 | laZardo Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:16:53am |
re: #419 albusteve
Perhaps with her audience slowly becoming the mainstream of the right wing, they have every right to be vigilant?
425 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:18:11am |
re: #389 Honorary Yooper
However, it's not foolproof. Look at Avanti. His karma went to -1000 before recovering. Then there's Space Jesus. He's the current king of negative karma, yet he's still very much around. Some commentors with highly positive karma have gotten the stick recently.
I'd cordially suggest you read the rest of my comment, where i point out that karma means nothing and that good posters can have very negative karma and bad posters can have very high karma.
426 | avanti Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:18:27am |
re: #419 albusteve
then why is the left so afraid of her?...or is their vitriol just an expression of unfounded rudeness?...which way is it?
They are not afraid of her, they just don't think she's a serious candidate. They don't mock her out of fear, they mock her because they think she's not the sharpest tack in the drawer.
427 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:18:34am |
re: #423 laZardo
Perhaps with her audience slowly becoming the mainstream of the right wing, they have every right to be vigilant?
something like that...I'm no fan of Palin especially but following her career is worthy...it appears the left is more interested in her than I am
429 | bluecheese Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:19:18am |
re: #405 Leonidas Hoplite
That's kinda interesting. 14% of revenue. Wow. Think of all the effort that goes into getting just 14% of revenue. Why not just eliminate corporate tax rates and reap the benefit of being the most favorable nation to operate in? All the jobs, investment, and tax reciepts...we could reduce unemployment and the deficit, maybe even buy everyone a second unicorn!
Corp tax receipts have been declining in recent years:
* Treasury Department figures show that actual corporate income tax revenues fell to $132 billion in 2003, down 36 percent from $207 billion in 2000.
* As a result of these low levels, corporate revenues in 2003 represented only 1.2 percent of the Gross Domestic Product (the basic measure of the size of the economy), the lowest level since 1983, the year in which corporate receipts plummeted to levels last seen in the 1930s.
* Corporate revenues represented only 7.4 percent of all federal tax receipts in 2003. With the exception of 1983, this represents the lowest level on record (these data go back to 1934).
Are you sure you want to cut corp tax rates rate more?
I give up.
430 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:19:41am |
re: #399 bluecheese
Try again.
PDF file
4th page down
TABLE 1
Total Tax revenue 2003
794 Billion (Individual)
132 Billion (Corporate)
857 Billion (other)
TOATL 1783 Billion
Total Tax Revenue 2006
1044 (ind)
354(corp)
1009 (other)
TOTAL 2407
431 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:20:03am |
re: #393 sattv4u2
[Link: www.heritage.org...]
The Heritage Foundation is shilling for insurance companies and is a known funnel for right wing propaganda.
Look them up on sourcewatch, and you can check that specific link's claims out on factcheck.org.
Bottom line: you can't trust anything they say about health reform.
432 | JanglerNPL Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:20:07am |
re: #416 Walter L. Newton
I think my #401 may be relevant here.
433 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:20:19am |
434 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:20:31am |
re: #399 bluecheese
re: #430 sattv4u2
Try again.
PDF file
4th page down
TABLE 1Total Tax revenue 2003
794 Billion (Individual)
132 Billion (Corporate)
857 Billion (other)
TOATL 1783 BillionTotal Tax Revenue 2006
1044 (ind)
354(corp)
1009 (other)
TOTAL 2407
[Link: www.cbo.gov...]
435 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:20:55am |
re: #427 albusteve
something like that...I'm no fan of Palin especially but following her career is worthy...it appears the left is more interested in her than I am
Of course they are, and they will do anything to goad the right into accepting her as a valid candidate. I don't like her at all, but that could back fire on the progressives if they don't watch out. With the current climate (hazy-with a chance of crazy), the right just may elect a person like her.
436 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:20:59am |
re: #426 avanti
They are not afraid of her, they just don't think she's a serious candidate. They don't mock her out of fear, they mock her because they think she's not the sharpest tack in the drawer.
Exactly. from a purely partisan left POV, she'd be the dream candidate in 2012.
437 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:21:10am |
re: #427 albusteve
You know, for someone who made her bones taking down corrupt, rich white guys from her own party, she really can't be as naive and clueless as many (including me) treat her.
438 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:21:51am |
re: #431 iceweasel
The Heritage Foundation is shilling for insurance companies and is a known funnel for right wing propaganda.
Look them up on sourcewatch, and you can check that specific link's claims out on factcheck.org.
Bottom line: you can't trust anything they say about health reform.
The discussion has NOTHING to do with health reform. Neither did my link
But thakns for playing!
Johnny ,,, lets give her the home version of the game as a parting gift!!
439 | Guanxi88 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:22:12am |
re: #434 sattv4u2
re: #430 sattv4u2
[Link: www.cbo.gov...]
re: #431 iceweasel
The
Heritage FoundationCongressional Budget Office is shilling for insurance companies and is a known funnel for right wing propaganda.Look them up on sourcewatch, and you can check that specific link's claims out on factcheck.org.
Bottom line: you can't trust anything they say about
health reformtax receipts.
440 | Leonidas Hoplite Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:22:28am |
re: #429 bluecheese
Are you sure you want to cut corp tax rates rate more?
I give up.
Yes. I'd prefer to have a real economy instead of a pretend one. You know, where you pretend to work and the government pretends to pay you.
441 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:22:34am |
re: #437 Spenser (with an S)
You know, for someone who made her bones taking down corrupt, rich white guys from her own party, she really can't be as naive and clueless as many (including me) treat her.
That's because a lot of people still believe that she said the things attributed to her that were actually said by Tina Fey on SNL, for starters.
442 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:23:11am |
re: #438 sattv4u2
The discussion has NOTHING to do with health reform. Neither did my link
But thakns for playing!
Johnny ,,, lets give her the home version of the game as a parting gift!!
You might want to bear in mind that the heritage foundation can;t be trusted for anything. As it happens, especially not health reform.
443 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:23:55am |
re: #439 Guanxi88
Except, of course, I was talking about the Heritage Foundation.
444 | avanti Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:24:00am |
re: #437 Spenser (with an S)
You know, for someone who made her bones taking down corrupt, rich white guys from her own party, she really can't be as naive and clueless as many (including me) treat her.
I think she is that clueless, and that's the perception outside her rabid fan base. 55% disapproval and way down in recent polling.
445 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:24:02am |
re: #442 iceweasel
You might want to bear in mind that the heritage foundation can;t be trusted for anything. As it happens, especially not health reform.
So repeating it means I AM talking about helath reform!?!?!?
I did not know that about me!!
446 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:24:03am |
re: #437 Spenser (with an S)
You know, for someone who made her bones taking down corrupt, rich white guys from her own party, she really can't be as naive and clueless as many (including me) treat her.
And if you think those same corrupt, rich white guys are going to let her have the nomination, I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale.
447 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:24:05am |
re: #438 sattv4u2
The discussion has NOTHING to do with health reform. Neither did my link
But thakns for playing!
Johnny ,,, lets give her the home version of the game as a parting gift!!
Someone must be juggling multiple propaganda postings on multiple blogs at the same time. Crossed the streams. That's dangerous. Can make one look silly.
448 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:24:54am |
re: #431 iceweasel
I love it when liberals tell me which sources can't be taken seriously. It tells me where to look for good info. You don't like them, but don't tell me that impressive group of econ. Phd's doesn't hold as much water as your lefty sources.
449 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:25:02am |
re: #437 Spenser (with an S)
You know, for someone who made her bones taking down corrupt, rich white guys from her own party, she really can't be as naive and clueless as many (including me) treat her.
I agree with that...it's interesting to watch what she does and the reaction from the left
450 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:25:16am |
re: #445 sattv4u2
So repeating it means I AM talking about helath reform!?!?!?
I did not know that about me!!
You linked the heritage foundation.
You should always, always, find a different source than them.
That was my point, and it stands. But be a dick about it if you like.
451 | laZardo Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:25:23am |
re: #437 Spenser (with an S)
She made a decent governor, I will give her that. But I still don't consider her really 'ready' for a national audience.
452 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:25:25am |
re: #447 Walter L. Newton
Someone must be juggling multiple propaganda postings on multiple blogs at the same time. Crossed the streams. That's dangerous. Can make one look silly.
I don't need any help doing that
Oh ,, wait ,, were you talking about me !?!!?!??!
//
453 | Killgore Trout Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:25:43am |
Can anyone explain why the Right wing blogs are suddenly opposed to the Olympics?
454 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:26:21am |
re: #450 iceweasel
You linked the heritage foundation.
You should always, always, find a different source than them.
That was my point, and it stands. But be a dick about it if you like.
And the name calling begins!
Ahhh , ,the fresh smell of angst!
455 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:26:28am |
re: #448 Spenser (with an S)
I love it when liberals tell me which sources can't be taken seriously. It tells me where to look for good info. You don't like them, but don't tell me that impressive group of econ. Phd's doesn't hold as much water as your lefty sources.
Actually, Charles has also mentioned that the Heritage Foundation isn't trustworthy.
And I already referred you to the nonpartisan source for checking these things out: sourcewatch.
456 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:26:53am |
re: #452 sattv4u2
I don't need any help doing that
Oh ,, wait ,, were you talking about me !?!!?!??!
//
You know I wasn't talking about you.
457 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:26:54am |
re: #453 Killgore Trout
Can anyone explain why the Right wing blogs are suddenly opposed to the Olympics?
It starts with an O. Like in Obama.
We hates Obama, precious, so we hates all Os.
458 | Killgore Trout Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:27:12am |
re: #450 iceweasel
The Heritage Foundation was busted recently for pushing a really bad graph. Something about government pay gowth vs private sector. It was laughable.
459 | laZardo Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:27:19am |
re: #453 Killgore Trout
I'm getting hints of allegations that the Canadian government is diverting money from the health care section of the budget to fund the Winter Olympics.
From the right-wing commenters on the DeviantArt political forum anyway.
460 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:27:23am |
re: #446 Sharmuta
And if you think those same corrupt, rich white guys are going to let her have the nomination, I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale.
I don't know and I don't think I want her there, just pointing out that is quite an accomplishment that she doesn't get a lot of credit for. Alaska politics was a corrupt and entrenched sewer and that was quite a coup.
461 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:27:36am |
re: #435 Walter L. Newton
Of course they are, and they will do anything to goad the right into accepting her as a valid candidate. I don't like her at all, but that could back fire on the progressives if they don't watch out. With the current climate (hazy-with a chance of crazy), the right just may elect a person like her.
progressive and backfire are synonymous imo
462 | Killgore Trout Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:27:50am |
re: #457 Sharmuta
Heh. That's as goon an explanation as any I suppose.
463 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:28:34am |
re: #453 Killgore Trout
Can anyone explain why the Right wing blogs are suddenly opposed to the Olympics?
I didn't know they were. I don't really read much among the vast unhinged anymore. What are they saying?
464 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:28:37am |
re: #458 Killgore Trout
The Heritage Foundation was busted recently for pushing a really bad graph. Something about government pay gowth vs private sector. It was laughable.
Oh no. That can't be true. Why, you must be a lefty for knowing that. Or pointing it out. Propaganda!
///
465 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:28:46am |
re: #450 iceweasel
You linked the heritage foundation.
You should always, always, find a different source than them.
That was my point, and it stands. But be a dick about it if you like.
ho hum
466 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:29:08am |
re: #453 Killgore Trout
Can anyone explain why the Right wing blogs are suddenly opposed to the Olympics?
I'm not sure. Let's see, Chicago wants it, President is from Chicago, President wants to speak directly to Olympic committee, no President has EVER shilled directly for any certain city before, sounds like typical Chicago styled strong-armed politics...
Nope, I have no idea. You're right, it's strange.
467 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:29:15am |
468 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:29:19am |
re: #453 Killgore Trout
Can anyone explain why the Right wing blogs are suddenly opposed to the Olympics?
You'll have to give more details; I haven't been to any of these sites opposing the Olympics.
469 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:29:28am |
re: #458 Killgore Trout
The Heritage Foundation was busted recently for pushing a really bad graph. Something about government pay gowth vs private sector. It was laughable.
Link?
470 | Ray in TX Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:29:47am |
re: #416 Walter L. Newton
You're the one who suggest that the reasoning "wasn't common sense." Back up your point.
So, let me get this straight.
Person A says 'Fact X is common sense and doesn't need support'
Person B says 'I don't think Fact X is common sense'
Person C tells B, 'You need to prove that Fact X is not common sense'
Do you not see how you have the burden of proof exactly backwards in this case? I wasn't making the assertion that some fact should be accepted as a self-evident truth. Besides, I don't need a "link" for the Clinton years. I can refresh your memory just as well.
Did they raise taxes? Yes, this is indisputable. I remember that VP Gore had to cast the tie-breaking vote on the 1993 budget because every Republican senator swore that it woudl destroy the economy, so they voted against it.
Did federal revenues go up? Yes. In Bush 41's last year, federal spending was $1410B with a deficit increase of $350B. That's $1060B in revenues. In Clinton's last year, spending was $1863B with a deficit increase of $141B. That's $1722B in revenues, a 62% increase over the 8 years.
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
471 | laZardo Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:29:49am |
re: #458 Killgore Trout
The Heritage Foundation was busted recently for pushing a really bad graph. Something about government pay gowth vs private sector. It was laughable.
472 | avanti Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:30:01am |
re: #466 Walter L. Newton
I'm not sure. Let's see, Chicago wants it, President is from Chicago, President wants to speak directly to Olympic committee, no President has EVER shilled directly for any certain city before, sounds like typical Chicago styled strong-armed politics...
Nope, I have no idea. You're right, it's strange.
I think Walter nailed it.
473 | gregb Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:30:03am |
re: #19 Floral Giraffe
OK, this is a video of some of the biggest surf to hit the West Coast in 20 or more years. The sound track is good too. If it's a little black dot, it's probably a person. 45 seconds of ads at the beginning.
[Link: www.surfline.com...]
Looks like K-38 on a sloppy day.
474 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:30:15am |
re: #462 Killgore Trout
Heh. That's as goon an explanation as any I suppose.
Could be some stupid reactionary thing against internationalism now. Who knows with these isolationist paleo-cons crawling out of the woodwork wtf their problem is.
475 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:30:43am |
re: #470 Ray in TX
So, let me get this straight.
Person A says 'Fact X is common sense and doesn't need support'
Person B says 'I don't think Fact X is common sense'
Person C tells B, 'You need to prove that Fact X is not common sense'Do you not see how you have the burden of proof exactly backwards in this case? I wasn't making the assertion that some fact should be accepted as a self-evident truth. Besides, I don't need a "link" for the Clinton years. I can refresh your memory just as well.
Did they raise taxes? Yes, this is indisputable. I remember that VP Gore had to cast the tie-breaking vote on the 1993 budget because every Republican senator swore that it woudl destroy the economy, so they voted against it.
Did federal revenues go up? Yes. In Bush 41's last year, federal spending was $1410B with a deficit increase of $350B. That's $1060B in revenues. In Clinton's last year, spending was $1863B with a deficit increase of $141B. That's $1722B in revenues, a 62% increase over the 8 years.
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
I needed a link, sorry, I guess I am not as smart and clever as you are.
476 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:31:15am |
re: #425 iceweasel
I'd cordially suggest you read the rest of my comment, where i point out that karma means nothing and that good posters can have very negative karma and bad posters can have very high karma.
You talkin' about me?
477 | laZardo Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:31:51am |
re: #466 Walter L. Newton
I'm not sure. Let's see, Chicago wants it, President is from Chicago, President wants to speak directly to Olympic committee, no President has EVER shilled directly for any certain city before, sounds like typical Chicago styled strong-armed politics...
Nope, I have no idea. You're right, it's strange.
I just realized that they'll decide for 2016 this Friday. Whoa.
/pleeeze let it be Tokyo
478 | Guanxi88 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:31:56am |
re: #443 iceweasel
Except, of course, I was talking about the Heritage Foundation.
Except, of course, that the CBO's figures are the source used by Heritage in the discussion of corporate tax receipts.
479 | Leonidas Hoplite Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:32:11am |
re: #466 Walter L. Newton
I'm not sure. Let's see, Chicago wants it, President is from Chicago, President wants to speak directly to Olympic committee, no President has EVER shilled directly for any certain city before, sounds like typical Chicago styled strong-armed politics...
Nope, I have no idea. You're right, it's strange.
Well just think of all the fantastic infrastructure spending - you'd have to build Chicagoans a brand new mountain range of their own! All those jobs, plus all the tourism dollars that would flow into the Land of Lincoln as a competitive alternative to those evil Rocky Mountain ski resorts!
480 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:32:11am |
re: #471 laZardo
Graphs you can trust
Ding ding! I guessed what that was before I even clicked on it.
481 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:32:27am |
re: #476 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
You talkin' about me?
No, but you're always on my mind, you sexy bastard. :)
482 | jaunte Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:32:38am |
re: #458 Killgore Trout
The Heritage Foundation was busted recently for pushing a really bad graph. Something about government pay gowth vs private sector. It was laughable.
Was it this one?
[Link: docs.google.com...]
483 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:33:25am |
re: #478 Guanxi88
Except, of course, that the CBO's figures are the source used by Heritage in the discussion of corporate tax receipts.
Sssshhh!!
484 | Killgore Trout Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:33:30am |
re: #482 jaunte
Yeah, I think that's it.
485 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:33:52am |
re: #477 laZardo
I just realized that they'll decide for 2016 this Friday. Whoa./pleeeze let it be Tokyo
Tokyo was really keen to get the Olympics, until G-dzilla tested positive for steroids over the weekend and has received a lifetime ban from participating. Now they're a little embarrassed, and I think that bad press about one of their national heroes just might hurt their chances.
486 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:34:09am |
BBL
Why the hell does the NFL schedule a conference call right before lunch!!
487 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:34:42am |
re: #479 Leonidas Hoplite
Well just think of all the fantastic infrastructure spending - you'd have to build Chicagoans a brand new mountain range of their own! All those jobs, plus all the tourism dollars that would flow into the Land of Lincoln as a competitive alternative to those evil Rocky Mountain ski resorts!
I'm not sure if you are being sarcastic with me about the Rocky Mountain region, but, I don't care about the Olympics or any sports. And I don't care who gets what.
But the plain simple fact of the matter is the President, who is usually supportive of the COUNTRY, and cheerleading for the COUNTRY to get an Olympic event, in this case, he is playing favorites... payback time again.
That's the facts.
488 | laZardo Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:34:45am |
re: #485 JamesTKirk
At least they still have Pikachu to fall back on, especially now that he's long since settled that seizures lawsuit.
489 | badger1970 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:34:48am |
re: #453 Killgore Trout
Let's see. IOU corruption, Chicago corruption, is it the POTUS job to shrill for home city?, Olympics cost more then they are worth, baseball is no longer an Olympic sport. /
490 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:34:48am |
re: #478 Guanxi88
Except, of course, that the CBO's figures are the source used by Heritage in the discussion of corporate tax receipts.
You can't ever trust anything the heritage foundation says, even if they provide a link. You have to factcheck it and link to the original sources. That's just the way it is. I'm not going to apologise for pointing this out to people and providing them, yet again, with the news that the Heritage Foundation sucks and all sources ought to be run through sourcewatch.
492 | jaunte Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:35:09am |
re: #484 Killgore Trout
Excluding lower paid Federal workers (the military) does tend to skew the comparison.
494 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:36:41am |
re: #490 iceweasel
You can't ever trust anything the heritage foundation says, even if they provide a link. You have to factcheck it and link to the original sources. That's just the way it is. I'm not going to apologise for pointing this out to people and providing them, yet again, with the news that the Heritage Foundation sucks and all sources ought to be run through sourcewatch.
Where have they lied or distorted the truth?
495 | Honorary Yooper Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:36:54am |
re: #431 iceweasel
I'd be just as weary of SourceWatch as well. They present the vast majority of articles there with a major slant to the left. It is a project of the Center for Media and Democracy, a rather leftist thinktank, and run by Sheldon Rampton. I'm just as skeptical of anything on there as I am of anything that comes from the right.
Here's some examples of SourceWatch articles. Compare if you will, and make of them what you will.
Barack Obama
George Bush
And then look at their Wikipedia articles,
Barack Obama
George Bush
497 | Guanxi88 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:38:13am |
re: #490 iceweasel
I'm not going to apologise for pointing this out to people and providing them, yet again, with the news that the Heritage Foundation sucks and all sources ought to be run through sourcewatch.
No skin off my nose about Heritage sucking. As for sourcewatch, well, I wonder can we run them through sourcewatch, or what that sort of fold the space-time continuum or something
498 | Honorary Yooper Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:38:23am |
re: #453 Killgore Trout
Can anyone explain why the Right wing blogs are suddenly opposed to the Olympics?
Obama is going to Copenhagen on Friday to aid the Chicago 2016 bid. I see no reason why not. Since it is a US city bidding for the Olympics, a US President going to aid the bid seems worthy, IMHO.
499 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:39:08am |
re: #487 Walter L. Newton
I think Chicago's been in the running for a while. It is for the Summer Olympics (I think)...
I don't want us to get it. Not because of Obama either. Peter Ueberoth was the last person to make any money... it is a cash hemhorraging monster. Ratings are pretty low, and you have to spend five hundred trillion dollars to run the damn thing.
Let's find a way to use the money more effectively.
The olympic stuff in China's already going bad (IIRC).
500 | jaunte Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:39:14am |
re: #496 bosforus
They compare compensation for a selected group (1.9 million Federal workers from the Executive branch only) with the compensation for the general working population.
501 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:39:16am |
re: #495 Honorary Yooper
I'd be just as weary of SourceWatch as well. They present the vast majority of articles there with a major slant to the left. It is a project of the Center for Media and Democracy, a rather leftist thinktank, and run by Sheldon Rampton. I'm just as skeptical of anything on there as I am of anything that comes from the right.
Don't confuse her with facts, especially when she's speaking ex cathedra.
502 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:39:58am |
re: #497 Guanxi88
No skin off my nose about Heritage sucking. As for sourcewatch, well, I wonder can we run them through sourcewatch, or what that sort of fold the space-time continuum or something
In a Malkovichian way, yes.
503 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:40:13am |
re: #498 Honorary Yooper
Obama is going to Copenhagen on Friday to aid the Chicago 2016 bid. I see no reason why not. Since it is a US city bidding for the Olympics, a US President going to aid the bid seems worthy, IMHO.
Okay, if this is seriously why right-wing blogs are actually upset, they need a SERIOUS reality check. I'm no fan of the city of Chicago, having lived in its shadow all my life; but at least that would put me within driving distance of actually, y'know, getting to GO to the Olympics. Something I know the Mrs. Fish would give my left nut for.
504 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:40:14am |
re: #498 Honorary Yooper
Obama is going to Copenhagen on Friday to aid the Chicago 2016 bid. I see no reason why not. Since it is a US city bidding for the Olympics, a US President going to aid the bid seems worthy, IMHO.
Good morning (-ish).
Me, I find it a little weird. It seems somewhat beneath the office of the President. I don't think it's some horrible scandal or anything, but I was surprised when I heard it on the radio this morning.
505 | Guanxi88 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:41:00am |
re: #502 Pianobuff
In a Malkovichian way, yes.
I'd support that, just for the sake of the experiment.
506 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:41:13am |
re: #485 JamesTKirk
Tokyo was really keen to get the Olympics, until G-dzilla tested positive for steroids over the weekend and has received a lifetime ban from participating. Now they're a little embarrassed, and I think that bad press about one of their national heroes just might hurt their chances.
In bed.
507 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:41:36am |
re: #495 Honorary Yooper
Good point. Believe half of what you see and none of what you hear. It pays to be skeptical, but I can't agree with the broad generalities that one think tank is totally wrong and the other has got it covered. It is way too partisan that way.
508 | laZardo Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:42:24am |
Just pulling some partisan spite out of nowhere...
It'd probably be the antithesis to George Bush opening Mitt Romney's 2002 Winter Olympics. That is if Obama is still president in 2016.
/and now back to your regularly scheduled ranting...
509 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:42:32am |
I also note that Rio de Janeiro is in the running as Olympics host. Much as I love Rio, I think that might not be the best idea; security issues alone would spell major problems. (Not to mention Rio's curiously underdeveloped hotel infrastructure.)
510 | badger1970 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:42:39am |
re: #498 Honorary Yooper
He couldn't have taken care of it the last time he was in Europe? I guess he's not busy enough being the president for partake in yet another junket. Do POTUS get frequent flier miles? /
511 | Leonidas Hoplite Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:42:53am |
re: #498 Honorary Yooper
Obama is going to Copenhagen on Friday to aid the Chicago 2016 bid. I see no reason why not. Since it is a US city bidding for the Olympics, a US President going to aid the bid seems worthy, IMHO.
Fine, but don't you think there are other things a little more important for him to be focusing his time and energy on?
He's President of the United States, not President of the City-State of Chicago. The Olympics will benefit Chicago, maybe, but have no visible impact on the rest of the US. Let Chicago worry about it and congratulations to them if they get it.
512 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:43:41am |
re: #509 Occasional Reader
I also note that Rio de Janeiro is in the running as Olympics host. Much as I love Rio, I think that might not be the best idea; security issues alone would spell major problems. (Not to mention Rio's curiously underdeveloped hotel infrastructure.)
Madrid and Tokyo are the other 2 cities.
513 | BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:43:42am |
re: #498 Honorary Yooper
Obama is going to Copenhagen on Friday to aid the Chicago 2016 bid. I see no reason why not. Since it is a US city bidding for the Olympics, a US President going to aid the bid seems worthy, IMHO.
Are there other U.S. cities in the running, or is it just Chicago?
514 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:43:45am |
I don't really care where they have the next Olympic games, I just want that hot Paraguayan javelin-thrower babe back.
515 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:43:57am |
re: #503 thedopefishlives
Okay, if this is seriously why right-wing blogs are actually upset, they need a SERIOUS reality check. I'm no fan of the city of Chicago, having lived in its shadow all my life; but at least that would put me within driving distance of actually, y'know, getting to GO to the Olympics. Something I know the Mrs. Fish would give my left nut for.
I don't think that's a big deal either, assuming that the summation here is correct and that other issues aren't involved. Getting the Olympics is a big prestige thing, naturally Obama wants to assist the US in getting it (especially if he can get some of that prestige to rub off on himself, and give him something -- finally, something! -- to write down on his list of "accomplishments"). I don't see any reason to protest or argue, I just shrug and remind myself that I don't watch the Olympics anyway.
However, the last thing I would ever want is for the Olympics to be held in a city near me; the crowds and insanity would have me hiding in my basement for weeks (the World Cup matches at RFK Stadium several years ago were bad enough) and the mess would linger for months.
516 | badger1970 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:44:18am |
re: #514 Occasional Reader
I don't really care where they have the next Olympic games, I just want that hot Paraguayan javelin-thrower babe back.
pic?
517 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:44:35am |
re: #513 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey
Are there other U.S. cities in the running, or is it just Chicago?
Yo!
I was wondering where you had gotten yourself off to. Hell, I wondered if you'd been banned (which seems to be all the rage these days). Nice to see you on the boards.
518 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:44:47am |
519 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:44:59am |
re: #504 Occasional Reader
Good morning (-ish).
Me, I find it a little weird. It seems somewhat beneath the office of the President. I don't think it's some horrible scandal or anything, but I was surprised when I heard it on the radio this morning.
it is beneath the office...and he does too many talk shows and speeches...you have to wonder when he governs, if he does...'course he has all those czars
520 | BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:45:04am |
re: #509 Occasional Reader
I also note that Rio de Janeiro is in the running as Olympics host. Much as I love Rio, I think that might not be the best idea; security issues alone would spell major problems. (Not to mention Rio's curiously underdeveloped hotel infrastructure.)
And the last I heard, they still haven't reclaimed the beaches from the hordes of ill-tempered monkeys.
/
521 | Honorary Yooper Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:45:05am |
re: #513 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey
Are there other U.S. cities in the running, or is it just Chicago?
Just Chicago for 2016. They're up against Madrid, Spain; Tokyo, Japan; and Rio.
522 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:45:16am |
re: #509 Occasional Reader
I also note that Rio de Janeiro is in the running as Olympics host. Much as I love Rio, I think that might not be the best idea; security issues alone would spell major problems. (Not to mention Rio's curiously underdeveloped hotel infrastructure.)
Oh my. I love Rio, but it has problems. Crime for one thing.
Will be going there on business again in October.
523 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:45:21am |
re: #515 JamesTKirk
However, the last thing I would ever want is for the Olympics to be held in a city near me; the crowds and insanity would have me hiding in my basement for weeks (the World Cup matches at RFK Stadium several years ago were bad enough) and the mess would linger for months.
Chicago is, thankfully, 7 hours' drive from here as the Fish-truck rolls. Close enough to drive into town and stay at a relative's house to attend, but far enough away that I don't have to worry about traffic from all those plonkers flying in from foreign countries. It helps that Chicago O'Hare International Airport is right there, so they don't even have to fly through here.
524 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:45:29am |
525 | Leonidas Hoplite Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:45:56am |
re: #519 albusteve
it is beneath the office...and he does too many talk shows and speeches...you have to wonder when he governs, if he does...'course he has all those czars
Shhh!
526 | The Left Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:46:02am |
re: #495 Honorary Yooper
I'd be just as weary of SourceWatch as well. They present the vast majority of articles there with a major slant to the left. It is a project of the Center for Media and Democracy, a rather leftist thinktank,
The CMD isn't leftist. SourceWatch is currently the only nonpartisan organisation that functions to, well, watch sources.
BBL, for real this time.
527 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:46:06am |
re: #515 JamesTKirk
I don't think that's a big deal either, assuming that the summation here is correct and that other issues aren't involved. Getting the Olympics is a big prestige thing, naturally Obama wants to assist the US in getting it (especially if he can get some of that prestige to rub off on himself, and give him something -- finally, something! -- to write down on his list of "accomplishments"). I don't see any reason to protest or argue, I just shrug and remind myself that I don't watch the Olympics anyway.
However, the last thing I would ever want is for the Olympics to be held in a city near me; the crowds and insanity would have me hiding in my basement for weeks (the World Cup matches at RFK Stadium several years ago were bad enough) and the mess would linger for months.
I personally don't want to see any city spending the tax base away on a venture like this while the economy is in the tank like this.
A lot of the money that pays for hosting an Olympic event comes from OUR pockets.
We don't need that kind of spending right now. Where is the fiscal responsibility?
528 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:46:35am |
re: #511 Leonidas Hoplite
Fine, but don't you think there are other things a little more important for him to be focusing his time and energy on?
529 | bosforus Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:46:40am |
re: #500 jaunte
Wooow, that's pretty crappy.
Although one could (not me) argue that the term "executive branch" is found in the first sentence,
Compensation for the federal government’s 1.9 million civilian workers in the executive branch costs almost $200 billion annually.
it's clear that throughout the rest of the article there was a blatant attempt to replace that fact with "all federal workers". They actually don't even try to tie in the fact that their transitioning the vocabulary from "executive branch employees" to "federal workers". The legends of the graph are textbook examples of not merely misleading but outright lying as graphs should be fully explained by their legends. The whole thing's disgusting.
530 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:46:49am |
531 | Leonidas Hoplite Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:47:28am |
532 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:47:40am |
re: #495 Honorary Yooper
Is that the same as the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy?
[Link: www.discoverthenetworks.org...]
533 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:48:07am |
re: #526 iceweasel
The CMD isn't leftist. SourceWatch is currently the only nonpartisan organisation that functions to, well, watch sources.
BBL, for real this time.
Somewhere... over the rainbow...
534 | badger1970 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:48:24am |
re: #530 Occasional Reader
Thanks. Can't argue with that- very beautiful.
535 | Dianna Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:48:44am |
re: #527 Walter L. Newton
I personally don't want to see any city spending the tax base away on a venture like this while the economy is in the tank like this.
A lot of the money that pays for hosting an Olympic event comes from OUR pockets.
We don't need that kind of spending right now. Where is the fiscal responsibility?
Los Angeles turned a profit, though. It was good for LA.
I think that dances like a vision in the heads of mayors and city councils everywhere.
536 | Leonidas Hoplite Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:49:16am |
re: #527 Walter L. Newton
We don't need that kind of spending right now. Where is the fiscal responsibility?
Fiscal responsibility doesn't get you re-elected. Just sayin'.
537 | Liberal Classic Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:49:18am |
re: #516 badger1970
I don't really care where they have the next Olympic games, I just want that hot Paraguayan javelin-thrower babe back.pic?
Her name is Leryn Franco.
538 | Killgore Trout Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:49:47am |
re: #498 Honorary Yooper
Obama is going to Copenhagen on Friday to aid the Chicago 2016 bid. I see no reason why not. Since it is a US city bidding for the Olympics, a US President going to aid the bid seems worthy, IMHO.
Agreed. These events are huge for the city's economy. Lot's of new construction of stadiums, hotels,etc. Seems like a good thing to me.
539 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:49:52am |
re: #527 Walter L. Newton
I personally don't want to see any city spending the tax base away on a venture like this while the economy is in the tank like this.
A lot of the money that pays for hosting an Olympic event comes from OUR pockets.
We don't need that kind of spending right now. Where is the fiscal responsibility?
imagine the carbon footprint left by travelers tied up in total gridlock trying to get into the city...Chicago is nearly inaccessible on any typical day
540 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:49:52am |
re: #534 badger1970
Thanks. Can't argue with that- very beautiful.
I remember half-watching the opening ceremonies, when everyone was prancing in wearing their national team outfits... just half-watching... and then my jaw hits the floor. "Who IS that?!"
541 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:50:51am |
re: #522 VioletTiger
Oh my. I love Rio, but it has problems. Crime for one thing.
Will be going there on business again in October.
Out of curiosity (and if you don't mind saying); where do you stay when you're in Rio?
542 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:51:37am |
re: #539 albusteve
imagine the carbon footprint left by travelers tied up in total gridlock trying to get into the city...Chicago is nearly inaccessible on any typical day
Maybe they would spend dollars into making Chicago a showcase "green city"?
543 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:51:40am |
re: #535 Dianna
Los Angeles turned a profit, though. It was good for LA.
I think that dances like a vision in the heads of mayors and city councils everywhere.
It's a big rish, though. Could be good, or you could have a lot of sports arenas sitting empty like so many recent venues.
544 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:52:14am |
re: #530 Occasional Reader
There wasn't even a javelin in that picture, that doesn't prove anything. I want to see the pole.
545 | Killgore Trout Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:52:20am |
Portland is in for a week of clouds and rain. Hooray!
546 | Honorary Yooper Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:53:10am |
re: #526 iceweasel
The CMD isn't leftist. SourceWatch is currently the only nonpartisan organisation that functions to, well, watch sources.
BBL, for real this time.
Bunk. Even the Wiki article I linked says the CMD is a "progressive" organization. Want their mission statement? Here's their About Us page. I find the selection of books near the bottom a bit telling. The CMD was founded by John Stauber, a man who has made a lot of money off books that went specifically to bash Bush. He's an anti-war and envrionmentalist activist.
I'm weary of anyone who is an activist and what they have to say, right or left.
547 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:53:28am |
548 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:53:44am |
re: #541 Occasional Reader
Out of curiosity (and if you don't mind saying); where do you stay when you're in Rio?
Either the Marriot Copacabana or Ceasar Park in Ipanema.
549 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:53:46am |
re: #544 Walter L. Newton
There wasn't even a javelin in that picture, that doesn't prove anything. I want to see the pole.
She doesn't have the pole anymore. The operation was a success.
550 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:53:49am |
Consider also how SourceWatch describes the organization Holy Land Trust (HLT), which spreads false propaganda about Jews robbing Arab lands and brutalizing Arabs in a repressive state of military occupation. Rather than mention any of these facts, SourceWatch merely cites HLT's self-description as "a Palestinian not-for-profit organization established … to promote and support the Palestinian community in its struggle … to achieve political independence … and … to assist in building an independent Palestine that is founded on the principles of nonviolence, democracy, respect for human rights and the peaceful resolution of conflicts."
The founder of SourceWatch is Sheldon Rampton, who also serves as CMD's Research Director. Rampton was formerly an outreach coordinator for the Wisconsin Coordinating Council on Nicaragua, a group established in 1984 to oppose President Reagan's efforts to stop the spread of Communism in Central America, and currently dedicated to promoting a leftist vision of "social justice in Nicaragua through alternative models of development and activism."
[Link: www.discoverthenetworks.org...]
551 | Ray in TX Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:54:02am |
re: #535 Dianna
Los Angeles turned a profit, though. It was good for LA.
I think that dances like a vision in the heads of mayors and city councils everywhere.
I read somewhere that Atlanta broke even. Athens lost money. Beijing turned a profit. Arguments about the current state of the economy, though, really don't apply to an event scheduled for 2016.
This is all about international prestige and relations. From that perspective, I don't have a huge problem with the president making a show for whatever US cities are in the running. Apparently Tony Blair and Vladimir Putin have already blazed this trail.
And it wasn't that long ago that we had a president who justified spending a full 1/3rd of his entire term away from the White House by claiming that he could do business from anywhere thanks to modern technology. I mean, all of the people worrying that Obama is doing "too much, too fast" should be *happy* to see him spending a few days in Europe lobbying for the Olympics.
552 | Honorary Yooper Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:54:08am |
re: #532 MandyManners
Is that the same as the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy?
[Link: www.discoverthenetworks.org...]
No, and I don't trust "Discover the Networks" either.
553 | BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:54:57am |
554 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:55:18am |
re: #546 Honorary Yooper
Ass opposed to a radical like horowitz and his discover the network who funds crypto-fascists like Robert Spencer?
See 550.
556 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:56:09am |
re: #524 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Sattv'll bring her to us wherever she is!
Yay Sattv!
yay ME!
(btw ,,, one of the cameramen at the San Diego/ Miami game yesterday panned to the SD cheerleadres every commercial break... YOU all saw the commercials ,, I did NOT)
557 | Honorary Yooper Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:56:10am |
re: #554 Sharmuta
Ass opposed to a radical like horowitz and his discover the network who funds crypto-fascists like Robert Spencer?
See 550.
See my #552. I don't trust them either. Both SourceWatch and Discover the Networks are partisan tripe.
558 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:56:19am |
re: #555 Sharmuta
Oops- sorry for the extra s on As.
Although, thinking about it, that may not have been such a mistake in te first place. ;)
559 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:56:23am |
Off to take my baby lizard to its new home! I found a pet store with a bunch of these thing who will take it.
No lizards were harmed in this operation.
560 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:56:37am |
re: #509 Occasional Reader
*NEWSFLASH*
Every single attendee and participant at the Olympics has been kidnapped...
They've got some of those problems down there... IIRC.
561 | bosforus Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:56:38am |
re: #553 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey
So many "javelin" comments to make, not to mention "pole-vaulting."
Did someone say pole vaulting?
562 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:57:15am |
re: #557 Honorary Yooper
See my #552. I don't trust them either. Both SourceWatch and Discover the Networks are partisan tripe.
Like with a wiki link- I use sourcewatch as a starting point and follow-up myself by looking deeper.
563 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:57:53am |
re: #548 VioletTiger
Either the Marriot Copacabana or Ceasar Park in Ipanema.
Both are good. Ever checked out "Marina All-Suites" in Leblon? My fave.
564 | Honorary Yooper Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:58:43am |
re: #562 Sharmuta
Like with a wiki link- I use sourcewatch as a starting point and follow-up myself by looking deeper.
I don't even bother with them (same I as I don't bother with Horowitz's POS site). I Google first. I've found that to be more accurate.
565 | Dianna Mon, Sep 28, 2009 8:58:56am |
re: #539 albusteve
imagine the carbon footprint left by travelers tied up in total gridlock trying to get into the city...Chicago is nearly inaccessible on any typical day
One of Tanya Huff's books proposes that the runways at O'Hare create an black, chaotic rune, which explains the horrors of trying to fly into and out of Chicago.
568 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:01:06am |
re: #553 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey
So many "javelin" comments to make, not to mention "pole-vaulting."
They've been done, of course, many times.
569 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:01:40am |
re: #565 Dianna
One of Tanya Huff's books proposes that the runways at O'Hare create an black, chaotic rune, which explains the horrors of trying to fly into and out of Chicago.
On of my friends once suggested that the Beltway around DC acted as a magical circle of protection to trap all of the evil inside. They were rather dismayed when I told them that the circle is broken once or twice a day by the opening of the drawbridge on the Woodrow Wilson Bridge.
570 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:01:46am |
re: #565 Dianna
One of Tanya Huff's books proposes that the runways at O'Hare create an black, chaotic rune, which explains the horrors of trying to fly into and out of Chicago.
as a destination or leaving point, O'Hare is an absolute nightmare...passing through is okay tho...imo
571 | Killgore Trout Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:01:49am |
So much for Hot Air's revised comment policy about racist slurs for the First Lady...
Leave politicians’ kids alone (no link)
It’s easy to leave the Obamas’ kids alone, since they’re cute. Hard to believe Barry and Lt. Worf are the parents.Daggett on September 28, 2009 at 11:26 AM
...
Ferengi…[Link: www.obamaorferengi.com...]
It’s easy to leave the Obamas’ kids alone, since they’re cute. Hard to believe Barry and Lt. Worf are the parents.
Daggett on September 28, 2009 at 11:26 AM
gaius on September 28, 2009 at 11:38 AM
They've just switched from Star Wars references to Star Trek.
572 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:02:33am |
re: #561 bosforus
Did someone say pole vaulting?
And the worst part is,,, you're up there in mid air,, THAT happens,, then you realize
"Shit ,,, I still have to LAND!!"
573 | laZardo Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:02:37am |
I don't trust think tanks.
I'd rather do the thinking myself.
/ :B
574 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:02:41am |
re: #571 Killgore Trout
So much for Hot Air's revised comment policy about racist slurs for the First Lady...
Leave politicians’ kids alone (no link)They've just switched from Star Wars references to Star Trek.
Paging Captain Kirk...
575 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:02:43am |
re: #564 Honorary Yooper
It like me linking to a Max Blumenthal story. Everyone rejects it simply because it's Max, and never mind if I fact checked the story before I linked it here. Just because a source is "left" doesn't make it inaccurate.
576 | jaunte Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:03:20am |
re: #546 Honorary Yooper
From your John Stauber wikipedia link:
In July 2003 Stauber and Sheldon Rampton wrote Weapons of Mass Deception: The Uses of Propaganda in Bush's War on Iraq, which argued that the Bush administration deceived the American public into supporting the war. In 2004, the two co-authored Banana Republicans, which argued that the Republican Party is turning the U.S. into a one-party state.
They may unfortunately have stumbled on something there, just not in the way they meant it originally.
578 | bosforus Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:03:44am |
re: #567 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Now. Was that necessary?
Only as a reminder to be safe on the job, no matter what your job may be.
579 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:04:32am |
re: #571 Killgore Trout
So much for Hot Air's revised comment policy about racist slurs for the First Lady...
Hmm.
Unkind, and in poor taste? Yes. Not entirely sure about "racist".
(And for the record, I think Michelle is a fairly attractive woman.)
580 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:04:33am |
re: #574 thedopefishlives
Paging Captain Kirk...
I'm not sure where Star Trek references fall on the "OMG! Racism!" scale, but it's already been established that any usage of a Star Wars reference must be racism. Just ask Darth Cheney.
P.S. There are still two E's in "wookiee"!
581 | Kragar Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:05:12am |
U.S. Commander of Afghanistan only talked to Obama once
The military general credited for capturing Saddam Hussein and killing the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq says he has only spoken to President Obama once since taking command of Afghanistan.
“I’ve talked to the president, since I’ve been here, once on a VTC [video teleconferece],” General Stanley McChrystal told CBS reporter David Martin in a television interview that aired Sunday.
“You’ve talked to him once in 70 days?” Mr. Martin followed up.
“That is correct,” the general replied.
Funny. I would think the Commander in Chief might want to check in with his senior commander in the field more often than that.
582 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:05:16am |
Silver lining on Rio?
Experts say that Rio de Janeiro has more kidnappings, but lower ransom demands.
[Link: www.emergency.com...]
583 | Killgore Trout Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:05:18am |
re: #575 Sharmuta
It like me linking to a Max Blumenthal story. Everyone rejects it simply because it's Max, and never mind if I fact checked the story before I linked it here. Just because a source is "left" doesn't make it inaccurate.
We find ourselves in an interesting bind. We've learned over the years to not trust lefty pundits and bloggers. Now we've learned we can no longer trust the wingnuts. There's no one to trust. We have to check our own facts as best we can.
584 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:05:24am |
re: #569 JamesTKirk
On of my friends once suggested that the Beltway around DC acted as a magical circle of protection to trap all of the evil inside.
I resemble that remark!
585 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:05:49am |
re: #579 Occasional Reader
Unkind, and in poor taste? Yes. Not entirely sure about "racist".
You've missed the memo. Any criticism of the Obamas is racist, because no other President or First LAdy in history has ever been insulted before ever.
586 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:06:09am |
re: #582 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Silver lining on Rio?
Experts say that Rio de Janeiro has more kidnappings, but lower ransom demands.
[Link: www.emergency.com...]
What a bargain!
587 | bosforus Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:06:37am |
re: #580 JamesTKirk
Comparing a white person to an ugly white person/alien is funny.
Comparing a black person to an ugly black person/alien is... racist?
588 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:06:53am |
[Link: www.wtkr.com...]
protest!...BO is NOT the Joker
589 | badger1970 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:07:02am |
re: #582 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
A perverse Law of Supply and Demand example.
590 | Killgore Trout Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:07:06am |
re: #579 Occasional Reader
I think the Klingon thing is out of line. Possibly even worse than the Wookie thing they used to do. What do you think a black conservative thinks when he reads those comments. I seriously doubt Hot Air has any black commenters left.
591 | Dianna Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:07:29am |
re: #585 JamesTKirk
You've missed the memo. Any criticism of the Obamas is racist, because no other President or First LAdy in history has ever been insulted before ever.
Can I still wince when MO dresses wrong for her figure and the occasion?
592 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:07:33am |
re: #584 Occasional Reader
re: #569 JamesTKirkOn of my friends once suggested that the Beltway around DC acted as a magical circle of protection to trap all of the evil inside.I resemble that remark!
You're not the only one. I also used to work in the Pentagon, which has had similar criticisms made (as well as being within the Beltway sigil).
593 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:08:29am |
re: #580 JamesTKirk
I'm not sure where Star Trek references fall on the "OMG! Racism!" scale
I do remember reading a somewhat spitballin' article in the Village Voice years ago, that toyed with the notion that ST:TNG Klingons were racist cariacatures of black people, and the Ferengi, of Jews. (But not even the Voice author was taking the hypothesis all that seriously, IIRC.)
594 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:08:54am |
re: #591 Dianna
Can I still wince when MO dresses wrong for her figure and the occasion?
No. Thou shalt not wince. You have to smile and applaud and sing any one of the variations of the Dear Leader Song or you'll be arrested and taken to Obama's super-sekrit socialist reprogramming camps.
/I probably don't have to, but I will anyway
595 | laZardo Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:09:20am |
re: #582 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Literally-criminal capitalist principles working at their finest. q:
596 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:09:22am |
re: #590 Killgore Trout
I think the Klingon thing is out of line. Possibly even worse than the Wookie thing they used to do. What do you think a black conservative thinks when he reads those comments. I seriously doubt Hot Air has any black commenters left.
Herman Cain thinks that it's ludicrous how every Obama slight is 'racist"
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
598 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:09:53am |
re: #590 Killgore Trout
I think the Klingon thing is out of line. Possibly even worse than the Wookie thing they used to do. What do you think a black conservative thinks when he reads those comments. I seriously doubt Hot Air has any black commenters left.
Exactly what criticism would you say is in line? And exactly how is the Klingon thing different from criticism other White House occupants have received?
/At least you were thoughtful enough to make sure that your comments were incontrovertibly racist.
599 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:10:30am |
re: #591 Dianna
Can I still wince when MO dresses wrong for her figure and the occasion?
Of course. You're a woman. If I, however, comment on how she's dressed, it means I'm gay. NTTAWWT.
600 | jaunte Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:11:22am |
Saying that the first lady looks like an alien is not innocent fun; it's meant to be insulting and divisive. Critics of the President's policies would be more effective if they avoided that.
602 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:11:45am |
re: #600 jaunte
Saying that the first lady looks like an alien is not innocent fun; it's meant to be insulting and divisive. Critics of the President's policies would be more effective if they avoided that.
So sort of like comparing President Bush to a chimpanzee, right?
603 | badger1970 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:11:53am |
re: #590 Killgore Trout
I think the Klingon thing is out of line. Possibly even worse than the Wookie thing they used to do. What do you think a black conservative thinks when he reads those comments. I seriously doubt Hot Air has any black commenters left.
With that logic, and the white male bashing the left does, I'm surprised that there are any lefty wasps. And who can forget the caricatures of Condi Rice?
605 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:12:17am |
re: #602 thedopefishlives
I should add, not that I'm condoning the Michelle == Klingon comparison. But I mean, you can't call one out and not the other.
606 | jaunte Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:14:16am |
re: #605 thedopefishlives
It makes the call for adult responsibility in taxing and spending policies less believable if the same critics follow that up with name calling.
608 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:15:14am |
re: #590 Killgore Trout
I think the Klingon thing is out of line. Possibly even worse than the Wookie thing they used to do. What do you think a black conservative thinks when he reads those comments. I seriously doubt Hot Air has any black commenters left.
For some reason, I'd say the wookie comparison is worse, but I can't really say why.
But, turning the question around; if someone wanted to make fun of Michelle's looks via a comparison to something in popular culture (not that I'm advocating this), what would be a NON-racist way to do it?
609 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:16:07am |
re: #598 JamesTKirk
Exactly what criticism would you say is in line? And exactly how is the Klingon thing different from criticism other White House occupants have received?
/At least you were thoughtful enough to make sure that your comments were incontrovertibly racist.
How about criticizing policy and not the woman's looks? What does her physical looks have to do with anything?!
610 | AuntAcid Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:16:30am |
"God so loved the world, that he sent his only begotten son to Washington."
611 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:16:36am |
re: #597 laZardo
Does that make Species 8472 the "prawns of District 9?"
/ 0:
I think you've outstripped my Trek Fu.
612 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:17:11am |
re: #590 Killgore Trout
I think the Klingon thing is out of line. Possibly even worse than the Wookie thing they used to do. What do you think a black conservative thinks when he reads those comments. I seriously doubt Hot Air has any black commenters left.
Does Zo do stuff with them from time to time?
613 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:17:12am |
re: #603 badger1970
This isn't about what the left did to Bush- this is about what people on the right are doing now. Pointing to what others did in the past is not an excuse.
614 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:17:23am |
re: #608 Occasional Reader
I think Michelle Obama has a "Mary Tyler Moore" thing going on. Don't know why. I've just always thought so.
Well not always, at one time I did not know Michelle Obama existed...
615 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:17:24am |
re: #608 Occasional Reader
But, turning the question around; if someone wanted to make fun of Michelle's looks via a comparison to something in popular culture (not that I'm advocating this), what would be a NON-racist way to do it?
Given his downding to my #585, and non-answer to my #598, it's quite possible that he does not believe that there is a non-racist way to do it.
616 | Dianna Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:17:37am |
re: #608 Occasional Reader
I think the cry "racist" would go up were someone to compare the First Lady to anyone, however lovely and intelligent, if there were any criticism contained in the comparison.
617 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:18:07am |
Just wait until we have the first green-skinned First Lady, and out come the Orion Slave Girl comparisons.
/
618 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:18:11am |
re: #597 laZardo
Does that make Species 8472 the "prawns of District 9?"blockquote>
What an odd movie that was. Good, but odd.
619 | jaunte Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:18:17am |
re: #609 Sharmuta
How about criticizing policy and not the woman's looks? What does her physical looks have to do with anything?!
Repeat for emphasis.
620 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:18:17am |
re: #608 Occasional Reader
For some reason, I'd say the wookie comparison is worse, but I can't really say why.
But, turning the question around; if someone wanted to make fun of Michelle's looks via a comparison to something in popular culture (not that I'm advocating this), what would be a NON-racist way to do it?
I would still call it misogynistic. Why attack the woman for her looks? What purpose does it serve?
621 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:19:09am |
re: #609 Sharmuta
How about criticizing policy and not the woman's looks? What does her physical looks have to do with anything?!
Why is it only offensive, racist, and/or sexist when this is done against targets on the left, and not when the exact same treatment is done to targets on the right? Why is it only suddenly a big deal now?
622 | badger1970 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:19:20am |
re: #613 Sharmuta
My apologies. I was quick-stepping the logic process that I though KT was getting to, why there are not more black conservatives.
623 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:19:38am |
624 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:19:52am |
What in world does the First Lady's appearance have to do with policy and how is criticizing her appearance stopping bad policy from being enacted?
625 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:20:09am |
re: #614 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
I think Michelle Obama has a "Mary Tyler Moore" thing going on. /blockquote>
RACIST!
/
(I have to say, I'm not seeing the MTM thing... )
626 | Dianna Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:20:12am |
re: #620 Sharmuta
I would still call it misogynistic. Why attack the woman for her looks? What purpose does it serve?
Ah, but pretty much every female here has winced at some of her fashion choices. And we're not the fashion police, here, just women.
I thought the last speech I heard her give was ridiculous, and I wondered how anyone listening to her talking about "how hard everything is" can keep a straight face.
627 | gregb Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:20:15am |
re: #475 Walter L. Newton
I needed a link, sorry, I guess I am not as smart and clever as you are.
After the balanced budget deal and the welfare reform deal, we had surpluses projected under the Clinton years. They pre-spent it like drunken sailors on shore-leave.
(No offense to any sailors on LGF).
I think the best thing for government is to never tell them we have a surplus. Projected or not...
628 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:20:57am |
re: #620 Sharmuta
I would still call it misogynistic. Why attack the woman for her looks? What purpose does it serve?
I didn't say it wasn't misogynistic; just debating the point about it being (necessarily) "racist".
629 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:21:02am |
re: #620 Sharmuta
I would still call it misogynistic. Why attack the woman for her looks? What purpose does it serve?
Men are constantly attacked for their looks. Bush looks like a monkey, Cheney looks like Palpatine, Rush Limbaugh is fat, etc.
So why do women get a free pass? Why is it suddenly sexist to treat them in the same way that men are treated?
630 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:21:13am |
re: #621 JamesTKirk
Why is it only offensive, racist, and/or sexist when this is done against targets on the left, and not when the exact same treatment is done to targets on the right? Why is it only suddenly a big deal now?
Yeah- because no one at this blog defended Sarah Palin from the misogynistic attacks she came under, right? Bullshit. It was called misogyny then and it applies to Michelle Obama just as much as it did to Sarah Palin.
631 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:21:42am |
re: #626 Dianna
I wondered how anyone listening to her talking about "how hard everything is"
In bed.
632 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:21:49am |
re: #563 Occasional Reader
Both are good. Ever checked out "Marina All-Suites" in Leblon? My fave.
Will look into that. I never have the final say, however.
633 | badger1970 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:21:53am |
Only if Michelle Obama followed these steps:
634 | Bear Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:21:57am |
Good morning all.
What a nice picture. Keep them coming Charles.
635 | Guanxi88 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:21:59am |
re: #610 AuntAcid
"God so loved the world, that he sent his only begotten son to Washington."
An oldie but a goodie:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/article4392846.ece
And it came to pass, in the eighth year of the reign of the evil Bush the Younger (The Ignorant), when the whole land from the Arabian desert to the shores of the Great Lakes had been laid barren, that a Child appeared in the wilderness.
The Child was blessed in looks and intellect. Scion of a simple family, offspring of a miraculous union, grandson of a typical white person and an African peasant. And yea, as he grew, the Child walked in the path of righteousness, with only the occasional detour into the odd weed and a little blow.
When he was twelve years old, they found him in the temple in the City of Chicago, arguing the finer points of community organisation with the Prophet Jeremiah and the Elders. And the Elders were astonished at what they heard and said among themselves: “Verily, who is this Child that he opens our hearts and minds to the audacity of hope?”
...
And so it was, in the fullness of time, before the harvest month of the appointed year, the Child ventured forth - for the first time - to bring the light unto all the world.
He travelled fleet of foot and light of camel, with a small retinue that consisted only of his loyal disciples from the tribe of the Media. He ventured first to the land of the Hindu Kush, where the
Taleban had harboured the viper of al-Qaeda in their bosom, raining terror on all the world.
And the Child spake and the tribes of Nato immediately loosed the Caveats that had previously bound them. And in the great battle that ensued the forces of the light were triumphant. For as long as the Child stood with his arms raised aloft, the enemy suffered great blows and the threat of terror was no more.
From there he went forth to Mesopotamia where he was received by the great ruler al-Maliki, and al-Maliki spake unto him and blessed his Sixteen Month Troop Withdrawal Plan even as the imperial warrior Petraeus tried to destroy it.
And lo, in Mesopotamia, a miracle occurred. Even though the Great Surge of Armour that the evil Bush had ordered had been a terrible mistake, a waste of vital military resources and doomed to end in disaster, the Child's very presence suddenly brought forth a great victory for the forces of the light.
And the Persians, who saw all this and were greatly fearful, longed to speak with the Child and saw that the Child was the bringer of peace. At the mention of his name they quickly laid aside their intrigues and beat their uranium swords into civil nuclear energy ploughshares.
From there the Child went up to the city of Jerusalem, and entered through the gate seated on an ass. The crowds of network anchors who had followed him from afar cheered “Hosanna” and waved great palm fronds and strewed them at his feet.
In Jerusalem and in surrounding Palestine, the Child spake to the Hebrews and the Arabs, as the Scripture had foretold. And in an instant, the lion lay down with the lamb, and the Israelites and Ishmaelites ended their long enmity and lived for ever after in peace.
As word spread throughout the land about the Child's wondrous works, peoples from all over flocked to hear him; Hittites and Abbasids; Obamacons and McCainiacs; Cameroonians and Blairites.
And they told of strange and wondrous things that greeted the news of the Child's journey. Around the world, global temperatures began to decline, and the ocean levels fell and the great warming was over.
The Great Prophet Algore of Nobel and Oscar, who many had believed was the anointed one, smiled and told his followers that the Child was the one generations had been w
636 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:22:35am |
re: #629 JamesTKirk
Men are constantly attacked for their looks. Bush looks like a monkey, Cheney looks like Palpatine, Rush Limbaugh is fat, etc.
So why do women get a free pass? Why is it suddenly sexist to treat them in the same way that men are treated?
Both are wrong- I don't attack men for their looks. It's childish and has noting to do with real issues.
637 | AuntAcid Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:22:44am |
638 | Dianna Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:22:49am |
re: #627 gregb
After the balanced budget deal and the welfare reform deal, we had surpluses projected under the Clinton years. They pre-spent it like drunken sailors on shore-leave.
(No offense to any sailors on LGF).
I think the best thing for government is to never tell them we have a surplus. Projected or not...
Don't we wish.
Granted, they're mostly trying to please their constituents. Even so, the problem tends to be that every single pol spends the whole surplus, not a little tiny share of it.
639 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:23:26am |
re: #626 Dianna
I think her choice of clothing is poor too, but I don't have to call her a klingon or call HER ugly- just the outfit. See the difference?
640 | laZardo Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:23:44am |
re: #635 Guanxi88
There is no god but Algore, and Michaelmoore is his Prophet.
641 | gregb Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:24:15am |
re: #615 JamesTKirk
Given his downding to my #585, and non-answer to my #598, it's quite possible that he does not believe that there is a non-racist way to do it.
Sure there is. Just borrow something from Rap or pr0n. At least the left won't label it as racist--though maybe you'll get some flack from the right, or Cosby at the very least.
I guess the real question is, what's wrong with her looks? Because she's tall and slender compared to all the short fat napoleanic congresscritters running around next to her?
642 | Killgore Trout Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:24:19am |
re: #608 Occasional Reader
But, turning the question around; if someone wanted to make fun of Michelle's looks via a comparison to something in popular culture (not that I'm advocating this), what would be a NON-racist way to do it?
Not sure, it's an individual thing. Different people have different sensibilities and everybody's entitled to be offended or not. However, in the political realm people need to be really careful about this stuff. If some comedian wanted to go on stage in a club and make comparisons like that in a humorous way I'd fully support their right to do it. To do it on a political blog or a right wing gathering is a different story. In the end is doesn't make any difference what you or I think about it. This stuff is going to make racial minorities uncomfortable, especially African Americans who have endured centuries of racist characatures. They are feeling the GOP in droves. Republicans can't survive as a whites only party. It's just not going to work.
643 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:25:05am |
re: #636 Sharmuta
Both are wrong- I don't attack men for their looks. It's childish and has noting to do with real issues.
If both are wrong, then there is no call to falsely toss around labels like "misogynistic" or "racist".
644 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:25:38am |
645 | jaunte Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:26:02am |
The silly part of the 'looks' criticisms is that they would disappear completely in the face of political agreement. If Michelle Obama decided tomorrow she was a conservative, suddenly she would be beautiful in the eyes of a lot of today's wookie-callers.
646 | Flyers1974 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:26:12am |
One question might be, why would conservatives WANT to critisize MO on any non-policy related issue, considering the difficulties the GOP has in getting 15% maybe 20% of the Black vote vote?
647 | Guanxi88 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:26:36am |
re: #645 jaunte
The silly part of the 'looks' criticisms is that they would disappear completely in the face of political agreement. If Michelle Obama decided tomorrow she was a conservative, suddenly she would be beautiful in the eyes of a lot of today's wookie-callers.
The eye that alters
Alters all.
648 | AuntAcid Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:27:33am |
re: #635 Guanxi88
that's all fine and dandy but can HE close the '016 Olympics for Chicago?
649 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:27:49am |
re: #632 VioletTiger
Will look into that. I never have the final say, however.
I also like the Sofitel, the only downside being that it's on Copacabana. Ipanema/Leblon is, IMHO, much nicer, much less of the sleaze/prostitution on display at night, and safer.
650 | Guanxi88 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:28:20am |
re: #648 AuntAcid
that's all fine and dandy but can HE close the '016 Olympics for Chicago?
Miracles can happen. Distressingly high rates of violence in that little town, though.
651 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:28:50am |
re: #643 JamesTKirk
If both are wrong, then there is no call to falsely toss around labels like "misogynistic" or "racist".
It's not falsely labeling it misogyny or racism because there is no reason to criticize the woman at all in this case. They're attacking the First Lady simply because she's Mrs. Obama. The left did not do this to Laura Bush.
652 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:29:17am |
re: #642 Killgore Trout
To do it on a political blog or a right wing gathering is a different story. In the end is doesn't make any difference what you or I think about it. This stuff is going to make racial minorities uncomfortable, especially African Americans who have endured centuries of racist characatures. They are feeling the GOP in droves.
Good point.
653 | Dianna Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:29:33am |
re: #639 Sharmuta
I think her choice of clothing is poor too, but I don't have to call her a klingon or call HER ugly- just the outfit. See the difference?
I do.
But I don't find Klingons unattractive. Fierce and vital, prickly and quarrelsome, more apt to bluster than a lot of humans like, but essentially quite an interesting culture.
So how is the comparison racist? I don't see it.
654 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:29:51am |
re: #645 jaunte
The silly part of the 'looks' criticisms is that they would disappear completely in the face of political agreement. If Michelle Obama decided tomorrow she was a conservative, suddenly she would be beautiful in the eyes of a lot of today's wookie-callers.
In my opinion, it is totally irrelevant what the person looks like. We are too caught up in a Hollywood culture. Once a woman or man has accomplishments and a life, they should be judged by their deeds and character and choices. Save the looks critique for the boring celebs and models whose job is to pose for the camera.
655 | Guanxi88 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:30:14am |
re: #651 Sharmuta
It's not falsely labeling it misogyny or racism because there is no reason to criticize the woman at all in this case. They're attacking the First Lady simply because she's Mrs. Obama. The left did not do this to Laura Bush.
True, but the Bush daughters were the subjects of some very unpleasant attention, as I recall.
656 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:30:33am |
re: #649 Occasional Reader
I also like the Sofitel, the only downside being that it's on Copacabana. Ipanema/Leblon is, IMHO, much nicer, much less of the sleaze/prostitution on display at night, and safer.
How often do you go there?
657 | Dianna Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:30:45am |
re: #641 gregb
Sure there is. Just borrow something from Rap or pr0n. At least the left won't label it as racist--though maybe you'll get some flack from the right, or Cosby at the very least.
I guess the real question is, what's wrong with her looks? Because she's tall and slender compared to all the short fat napoleanic congresscritters running around next to her?
It's not her looks I despair of, it's her clothes. Sheaths do not suit a great, tall woman with an actual bust and rear.
658 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:30:47am |
659 | Guanxi88 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:31:07am |
re: #651 Sharmuta
It's not falsely labeling it misogyny or racism because there is no reason to criticize the woman at all in this case. They're attacking the First Lady simply because she's Mrs. Obama. The left did not do this to Laura Bush.
And I DO think it's a political use of an underlying cultural shortcoming; in this case, misogyny, which is real.
660 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:31:26am |
re: #653 Dianna
I do.
But I don't find Klingons unattractive. Fierce and vital, prickly and quarrelsome, more apt to bluster than a lot of humans like, but essentially quite an interesting culture.
So how is the comparison racist? I don't see it.
I agree. It is not kind, but it isn't racist.
661 | Danny Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:31:32am |
re: #651 Sharmuta
It's not falsely labeling it misogyny or racism because there is no reason to criticize the woman at all in this case. They're attacking the First Lady simply because she's Mrs. Obama. The left did not do this to Laura Bush.
They sure slammed the Bush daughters, though.
662 | albusteve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:32:05am |
re: #654 VioletTiger
In my opinion, it is totally irrelevant what the person looks like. We are too caught up in a Hollywood culture. Once a woman or man has accomplishments and a life, they should be judged by their deeds and character and choices. Save the looks critique for the boring celebs and models whose job is to pose for the camera.
just another facet of AmIdol politics...non issues dividing people into smaller groups, waiting to howl about their agenda...in this case it's Jokers and Wookies etc...it's laughable
663 | AuntAcid Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:32:15am |
re: #650 Guanxi88
Miracles can happen. Distressingly high rates of violence in that little town, though.
I think is confined to the Lutheran controlled areas.
664 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:32:23am |
665 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:32:52am |
re: #653 Dianna
But I don't find Klingons unattractive.
Would you like to stop by my place for a late-night snack of Q'ah?
/
666 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:33:17am |
re: #664 Walter L. Newton
You can't bring that up... it's... well... truth.
Just the facts, ma'am ,, just the facts
(channeling my inner Joe Fiday)
667 | Wishbone Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:33:24am |
re: #653 Dianna
Because Klingons are dark skinned; Black people are also dark skinned.
The comparison only works because of this shared characteristic; ergo it's racist.
I'm British... I know PC biollocks when I see it.
668 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:33:24am |
re: #658 Occasional Reader
One attack? Is that all you could find? And you seriously think LGF wouldn't have covered more of this? Or any other right-wing site? Mrs. Bush never saw the sorts of attacks we're seeing on MO.
669 | jaunte Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:33:26am |
re: #660 VioletTiger
I think the implication that those people are 'not like us' contained within describing them as a fictional alien species may be a tad divisive.
670 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:33:37am |
re: #658 Occasional Reader
Hmm. Why the down-ding, Sharmuta?
671 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:34:25am |
re: #668 Sharmuta
One attack? Is that all you could find?
I picked the first one that popped up, dear. Not an exhaustive review.
And would you like to talk about attacks on, say, Nancy Reagan?
672 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:34:33am |
re: #670 Occasional Reader
You knock yourself out justifying these attacks on Michelle Obama, Honey.
673 | bloodnok Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:34:44am |
674 | Honorary Yooper Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:35:28am |
re: #655 Guanxi88
True, but the Bush daughters were the subjects of some very unpleasant attention, as I recall.
Yes, they were. However, just because the left did it 2000-2009 does not in any way, shape, or form, for the right to do it too. One does not need to "give as good as they got". That's childish, stupid, and simply turns people who might be willing to give the benefit of the doubt off.
Tit or tat is no way to act.
675 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:35:34am |
re: #651 Sharmuta
It's not falsely labeling it misogyny or racism because there is no reason to criticize the woman at all in this case. They're attacking the First Lady simply because she's Mrs. Obama. The left did not do this to Laura Bush.
Laura Bush mostly avoided politics and stayed out of the spotlight. I recall the treatment Nancy Reagan got, however.
676 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:35:48am |
re: #656 VioletTiger
How often do you go there?
I used to more frequently, but haven't been since, mm, fall 2007.
677 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:35:54am |
re: #671 Occasional Reader
I picked the first one that popped up, dear. Not an exhaustive review.
And would you like to talk about attacks on, say, Nancy Reagan?
I don't know- were the attacks on Nancy Reagan wrong? And if so, why are they not wrong now? Double standards are acceptable now, or something?
678 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:36:10am |
re: #669 jaunte
I think the implication that those people are 'not like us' contained within describing them as a fictional alien species may be a tad divisive.
It is certainly mean, and I really have no time for those people.
679 | Danny Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:36:14am |
re: #671 Occasional Reader
I picked the first one that popped up, dear. Not an exhaustive review.
And would you like to talk about attacks on, say, Nancy Reagan?
You also picked a major newspaper columnist. The wookie/klingon/fashion attacks on MO are coming from blog comments. I suspect there were a lot of disrespectful blog comments about Laura and kids.
680 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:36:25am |
re: #672 Sharmuta
You knock yourself out justifying these attacks on Michelle Obama, Honey.
And now I DID downding you, for falsely suggesting that I'm "justifying" the attacks. Bleah.
681 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:36:34am |
re: #642 Killgore Trout
Not sure, it's an individual thing. Different people have different sensibilities and everybody's entitled to be offended or not. However, in the political realm people need to be really careful about this stuff. If some comedian wanted to go on stage in a club and make comparisons like that in a humorous way I'd fully support their right to do it. To do it on a political blog or a right wing gathering is a different story. In the end is doesn't make any difference what you or I think about it. This stuff is going to make racial minorities uncomfortable, especially African Americans who have endured centuries of racist characatures. They are feeling the GOP in droves. Republicans can't survive as a whites only party. It's just not going to work.
KT - How did you feel about Wanda Sykes jokes and Obama's laughter several months ago? Did you feel that was within boundaries?
682 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:37:37am |
re: #672 Sharmuta
You knock yourself out justifying these attacks on Michelle Obama, Honey.
Sharmuta, I don't anyone here is saying the attacks are justified. I think it is just a discussion on whether they are racial or just mean-spirited.
683 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:38:05am |
re: #677 Sharmuta
I don't know- were the attacks on Nancy Reagan wrong? And if so, why are they not wrong now? Double standards are acceptable now, or something?
Have you actually bothered to read my comments? You know, where I usd the words "unkind" and "in poor taste" to refer to the attacks? Did you read the part where I reminded you that we were SPECIFICALLY talking about the "racist" allegation?
Calm down.
684 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:39:12am |
re: #673 bloodnok
No mention of aliens or other species in association with L. Bush in there. Not sure it compares. Insulting? Yes. The same? No.
Prim, sexless, nearly useless, lets the men do the real thinkin'
Just showed this and the comparison to a Klingon/ Wookiee to a female African American co-worker.
She stated she would be WAY more pissed if she were labeled Prim, sexless, nearly useless, lets the men do the real thinkin'!
Not a scientific nor extensive poll, but ,, just sayin!
685 | bloodnok Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:39:41am |
re: #684 sattv4u2
Prim, sexless, nearly useless, lets the men do the real thinkin'
Just showed this and the comparison to a Klingon/ Wookiee to a female African American co-worker.
She stated she would be WAY more pissed if she were labeled Prim, sexless, nearly useless, lets the men do the real thinkin'!
Not a scientific nor extensive poll, but ,, just sayin!
I didn't think so either.
686 | Killgore Trout Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:39:56am |
re: #681 Pianobuff
KT - How did you feel about Wanda Sykes jokes and Obama's laughter several months ago? Did you feel that was within boundaries?
I'm not aware of what she said but I think she's very funny. Like I said I have no problem with comedians doing racial humor. A lot of times I think it's funny when done in the right way even if it's cringe inducing. When it's done in a political setting it's a very different story. I know it's a double standard but it's the reality of the situation.
687 | Liberal Classic Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:40:17am |
re: #603 badger1970
And who can forget the caricatures of Condi Rice?
Portrayals of Condoleezza Rice by cartoonists like Ted Rall really, really left a bad taste in my mouth. One would think she'd have been a symbol of powerful and independent woman, except that she was on the wrong side of the aisle. But then, she wasn't a First Lady. Personally, I think she'd make a hell of a president.
Characterizations of Hillary Clinton during her tenure as First Lady coming from the right were often very unkind. I recall plenty of cartoons in which she was shown as fat and ugly. The left was not particularly kind to Laura Bush. The most common stereotype seems to have been that of Stepford Wife, rather than hag.
I'd rather get away from all of this with Michelle Obama. She can be on the cover of Ebony magazine as many times as she wants. As far as I can tell, she hasn't really positioned herself as a co-policy-maker in the same way Hillary Clinton did during Bill's presidency. In this sense, she's copping more of a Laura Bush posture. I don't object to First Lady co-policy-maker in principle, but it does open up the First Lady to partisan attack.
In sum, epithets such as wookie and klingon should be opposed on the basis that they are generally in bad taste. Not necessarily racist, but generally crass. There's plenty to complain about in the Obama administration without heaping invectives on his wife and children.
688 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:40:36am |
re: #675 JamesTKirk
Laura Bush mostly avoided politics and stayed out of the spotlight. I recall the treatment Nancy Reagan got, however.
I was leafing through a recently-published book about the Secret Service in a bookstore this weekend, and the author confirms what I'd already heard from a personal source: The USSS Presidential security detail really, personally liked George W., but they absolutely adored Laura.
689 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:40:52am |
690 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:41:51am |
re: #686 Killgore Trout
I'm not aware of what she said but I think she's very funny. Like I said I have no problem with comedians doing racial humor. A lot of times I think it's funny when done in the right way even if it's cringe inducing. When it's done in a political setting it's a very different story. I know it's a double standard but it's the reality of the situation.
Fair enough. The reason I asked is because she was the MC at a political event that Obama attended. There were at least one or two fairly vicious jokes that Obama laughed at.
If you aren't aware of it, I guess it's hard to have an opinion though.
691 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:42:09am |
It would be nice if people were never ever attacked based upon their appearance, but hey -- welcome to the real world. It happens to every politician and their family. It's one of the costs of living in the limelight, and anybody with half a brain knows that and expects it before they get into that situation. Like nuclear weapons, Mr. Obama, personal attacks are not going to go away just because you close your eyes and wish them away.
692 | bloodnok Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:42:24am |
re: #689 sattv4u2
So my co-worker should just STFU and STFD?
Yes, satt. I really said those exact words. I really, really did.
/sheesh.
693 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:42:31am |
Well friends, boarding passes are printed and suitcase is only half-packed.
I did do one good deed today--I saved the baby critter. The store owner identified it as a house gecko and put it with other babies of its species.
Later.
694 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:44:03am |
re: #692 bloodnok
Yes, satt. I really said those exact words. I really, really did.
/sheesh.
I never posted that you "said those words"
You do know what a QUESTION mark signifies, don't you?
/sheesh.
(nice non-answer, btw)
695 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:45:24am |
re: #687 Liberal Classic
As far as I can tell, she hasn't really positioned herself as a co-policy-maker in the same way Hillary Clinton did during Bill's presidency.
Agreed. She did "open the door", so to speak, during the campaign, because she was... well... campaigning, on her husband's behalf. So I think things like her "for the first time in my adult life, I'm proud of my country" line were fair game at the time. But she seems to have stepped back now, and I don't find criticisms of her to be relevant (even when they're not mean-spirited, as the wookie/klingon stuff is).
Personally, I *do* have a problem with the concept of a First Lady (or eventual First Gentleman) being given quasi-policy jobs, on the simple grounds that it seems like the worst sort of nepotism. (Or "uxorism"?)
696 | Dianna Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:46:24am |
re: #665 Occasional Reader
Would you like to stop by my place for a late-night snack of Q'ah?
/
Ahem.
You're married, and I'm attached, so...no.
697 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:46:28am |
re: #683 Occasional Reader
Why bring up the past unless you're trying to somehow justify what's going on now? It's wrong- and to compare the current First Lady to an alien- it's racist and misogynistic.
I would suggest some reading for you on misogyny, but I don't think you're interested.
698 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:47:19am |
re: #696 Dianna
Ahem.
You're married, and I'm attached, so...no.
Attached to what?
How ?? VELCRO?? Bolts?
699 | Bloodnok Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:47:48am |
re: #694 sattv4u2
I never posted that you "said those words"
You do know what a QUESTION mark signifies, don't you?
/sheesh.
(nice non-answer, btw)
I would answer that the only person that needs to STFD is you as you are already getting worked up over nothing. I agreed with you that your poll, which you admitted was not extensive, was just that. Not extensive and didn't prove anything one way or another. But the urge to froth is strong with you. Stop trying to create arguments where there aren't any.
700 | Dianna Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:49:07am |
re: #672 Sharmuta
You knock yourself out justifying these attacks on Michelle Obama, Honey.
He's not justifying. He's pointing out that this is not new, different, or anything else.
And OR's asking you to look and see that while it may be tiresome, mean-spirited and a diversion, it is not exceptional, and it need not always be considered racist, or misogynist.
701 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:49:26am |
re: #697 Sharmuta
Why bring up the past unless you're trying to somehow justify what's going on now?
Uh... you're the one who initially brought up the past, Sharmuta. You claimed the left never did it to Laura. I refuted. And now you're pointing at me and angrily demanding why I brought up the past. Whatever.
702 | Dianna Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:50:35am |
re: #697 Sharmuta
You asked him to provide examples of attacks on Laura Bush. He did. What is your problem, here? That he doesn't instantly fall on his sword?
703 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:50:37am |
re: #696 Dianna
Ahem.
You're married, and I'm attached, so...no.
Plus your "attachment" has a black belt... and mine has a Latin temper!
Okay. No Q'ah for you.
704 | jaunte Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:51:31am |
There is a degree of difference in calling someone an ugly human and calling them an ugly alien. Aliens are foreign, and don't belong here. This is part of the opponent's message.
705 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:52:09am |
re: #699 Bloodnok
I se, So because you don't like/agree/can't handle critisim, that person should STFD
If you gave it half a minute instead of reflexively posting perhaps you would realixe that my co-workers thought and feeling does in fact "prove something". But because it didn't "prove" what you wanted it to, you dismissed it out of hand
How's that for 'froth"?
(actually ,,, it's pretty tame as compared to what I'm capable of!)
706 | Occasional Reader Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:53:13am |
re: #697 Sharmuta
I would suggest some reading for you on misogyny, but I don't think you're interested.
Oh, golly. Iceweasel already outed me as a misogynist, because I used the "c" word.
Yes, that's right... "charming". Which is a sekrit womyn-haytur kode werd, as everyone knows.
Could you at least TRY to debate without going ridiculously ad hominem?
Off to lunch. Bye.
707 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:53:33am |
re: #702 Dianna
What is your problem, here?
WTF is yours? You can't figure out calling the First Lady an alien is racist.
I'm not the one making excuses for hot air comments.
708 | Bloodnok Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:53:55am |
re: #704 jaunte
There is a degree of difference in calling someone an ugly human and calling them an ugly alien. Aliens are foreign, and don't belong here. This is part of the opponent's message.
Thank you. This is not hard to figure out. It is dehumanizing to compare people to science fiction creations.
709 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:54:33am |
re: #707 Sharmuta
WTF is yours? You can't figure out calling the First Lady an alien is racist.
I'm not the one making excuses for hot air comments.
NOBODY
repeat
NOBODY made an excuse for the comment
710 | Bloodnok Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:54:50am |
re: #705 sattv4u2
I se, So because you don't like/agree/can't handle critisim, that person should STFD
If you gave it half a minute instead of reflexively posting perhaps you would realixe that my co-workers thought and feeling does in fact "prove something". But because it didn't "prove" what you wanted it to, you dismissed it out of hand
How's that for 'froth"?
(actually ,,, it's pretty tame as compared to what I'm capable of!)
*waves* Hi satt!
711 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:55:52am |
712 | Dianna Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:55:52am |
re: #707 Sharmuta
WTF is yours? You can't figure out calling the First Lady an alien is racist.
I'm not the one making excuses for hot air comments.
I'm not excusing Hot Air comments.
And comparing the First Lady to an alien is not racist, unless you make some stretches and twists. But if you want to believe that, go right ahead.
Note my comments about Klingons: I like 'em, and I don't in any way view them as some sort of negative comparison.
But...hey, whatever.
713 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:56:02am |
re: #702 Dianna
You asked him to provide examples of attacks on Laura Bush. He did. What is your problem, here? That he doesn't instantly fall on his sword?
We're not allowed to confuse IW or Sharmuta with facts. They know what's right for us to say and think.
714 | Wishbone Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:56:28am |
re: #697 Sharmuta
You read like a 'right on' youth worker. No matter what the actual rationale for making the comparison, you'll find some way to paint it as racism or misogyny.
I can see where the comparison comes from. It's not a nice way of having a pop at someone, but it has nothing to do with sex or race.
715 | Dianna Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:56:41am |
re: #708 Bloodnok
Thank you. This is not hard to figure out. It is dehumanizing to compare people to science fiction creations.
Really?
That is a ridiculous position.
716 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:58:11am |
re: #707 Sharmuta
WTF is yours? You can't figure out calling the First Lady an alien is racist.
It's not racist if white people have received the exact same treatment. That doesn't make ti right, but that does negate the knee-jerk "OMG! Racist!" response to any critique of the Obamas.
I'm not the one making excuses for hot air comments.
If you want to criticize someone for racist Hot Air comments, I suggest you speak to KT.
717 | Bloodnok Mon, Sep 28, 2009 9:59:18am |
re: #715 Dianna
Really?
That is a ridiculous position.
So it's a term of affection then? Gee, thanks for setting me straight. I'm glad you think they're cute, BTW.
This is astounding.
718 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:00:02am |
re: #717 Bloodnok
It's possible for something to be insulting without it being racist.
719 | Dianna Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:00:46am |
re: #717 Bloodnok
So it's a term of affection then? Gee, thanks for setting me straight. I'm glad you think they're cute, BTW.
This is astounding.
I think it would very much depend on the comment, the science fiction creation chosen, and how the comparison is phrased.
Personally? I'd love to be favorably compared to Jago, and Atevi Assassin.
720 | Dianna Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:01:24am |
re: #719 Dianna
I think it would very much depend on the comment, the science fiction creation chosen, and how the comparison is phrased.
Personally? I'd love to be favorably compared to Jago, and Atevi Assassin.
Did I mention that Atevi are black?
721 | Bloodnok Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:06:35am |
re: #718 JamesTKirk
It's possible for something to be insulting without it being racist.
And it's possible for people not to see the racism because, well intentioned though they may be, they don't want to admit it's there because it is a horrible thing. None of us want to see it, and especially coming from "our side". As KT said miles upthread -it may not even be that the intent is racist. It's just that it can be seen as racist and it's not what the GOP needs in exchange for a few cheap insults. I just happen to believe it is.
722 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:15:15am |
re: #721 Bloodnok
The term racist is thrown around much too freely. It has lost it's meaning for the most part
What we mostly see is prejudice and bigotery.
There are racists in this (and every) country! Fortunately they are a very tiny faction of the populace
723 | Wishbone Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:20:08am |
re: #721 Bloodnok
"Seen as racist"?
That's bollocks. Call things crass, ungracious or simply bang out of order if you will, but don't sit there and play X degrees of racism with such comments because someone could 'see' it as racism, no matter how tenuous the racial connotations.
If you want to see where that gets you, take a good look at Britain today. This is a nation where Conservatism has been dragged so far to the left, because of the fear of how people may 'see' things and take offense, that they're no answer at all any more to the rampant multiculturalism and political correctness that is at the heart of Labour/Liberal thinking and is completely fucking my country.
You want to fuck yours... keep thinking like that.
724 | Charles Johnson Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:22:15am |
re: #721 Bloodnok
And it's possible for people not to see the racism because, well intentioned though they may be, they don't want to admit it's there because it is a horrible thing. None of us want to see it, and especially coming from "our side". As KT said miles upthread -it may not even be that the intent is racist. It's just that it can be seen as racist and it's not what the GOP needs in exchange for a few cheap insults. I just happen to believe it is.
In every single LGF thread about racism, people have insisted that it doesn't really exist, and tried to rationalize it away. This even includes the most indisputable, obvious cases, such as that Photoshop of Obama as a witch doctor with a bone through his nose. I was astounded when people actually tried to argue that it was not a racist image -- and not just a few people.
Denial is a very powerful force right now on the right wing.
725 | jaunte Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:23:35am |
What if a disguised alien ran for President and won?/
Nirthers hear the dog whistle in a wookie joke.
726 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:24:46am |
re: #724 Charles
that Photoshop of Obama as a witch doctor with a bone through his nose.
100% racist and 100% wrong.
but imho there is still an overuse of terming something as racist when in fact it is either bigoted or prejudice driven
727 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:27:00am |
I don't see people denying it exists; but merely arguing that it is overused to the point of crying wolf.
728 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:27:50am |
re: #724 Charles
In every single LGF thread about racism, people have insisted that it doesn't really exist, and tried to rationalize it away. This even includes the most indisputable, obvious cases, such as that Photoshop of Obama as a witch doctor with a bone through his nose.
Denial is a very powerful force right now on the right wing.
And even on this thread. The President's a foreigner, and the First Lady is an alien, and I'm supposed to think racism doesn't have something to do with this?
And it's real cute how folks are still more upset by Killgore than they are at crap like "klingon".
729 | bloodnok Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:28:08am |
re: #723 Wishbone
Take a look at the demographics of the GOP in America and get back to me. Yes, it does matter how things are perceived if the right wants to win elections again. And forget how it impacts the GOP, by the way, racism is just plain wrong. And I'm not going to resist pointing it, or the appearance of it out for fear of bringing about some multicultural revolution you seem to fear so much.
730 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:31:56am |
re: #728 Sharmuta
And even on this thread. The President's a foreigner, and the First Lady is an alien, and I'm supposed to think racism doesn't have something to do with this?
And it's real cute how folks are still more upset by Killgore than they are at crap like "klingon".
Probably because "n***r", unlike "Klingon", really IS a racist word.
731 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:33:56am |
Perhaps some of the problem is defining racism/ bigotry
As I have stated, I beleive the word has lost it's meaning over the years, or rather has become so broadened as to have lost it
RACIST,.,, the beleif that ones race is superior to all others
BIGOT,,intolerance of differeing creeds, races or beleifs
They are not the same thing
732 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:34:13am |
re: #726 sattv4u2
You are aware that hot air is playing host to an actual racist on thier site, and it doesn't occur to you that the name calling might have something to do with actual racism?
re: #730 JamesTKirk
Context means nothing? KT was trying to make a point. What point is being made in calling the First Lady a "klingon"?
733 | Charles Johnson Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:34:14am |
re: #727 JamesTKirk
I don't see people denying it exists; but merely arguing that it is overused to the point of crying wolf.
I've seen a LOT of people at LGF denying it exists, in every single article I've posted on the subject of racism.
734 | Charles Johnson Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:36:07am |
re: #719 Dianna
I think it would very much depend on the comment, the science fiction creation chosen, and how the comparison is phrased.
Personally? I'd love to be favorably compared to Jago, and Atevi Assassin.
Come on. You're not seriously trying to argue that those commenters intended their comparisons to be flattering, are you?
736 | Wishbone Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:39:23am |
re: #724 Charles
Defining racism/religious offense in a comment, or act, or whatever, by grasping at the most tenuous connection to a racial or religious based rationale, has caused no end of trouble for ethnic and religious minorites here in Britain.
Can you imagine how many times some poor bastard Muslim bloke, or average black fella has slapped his head with his hand, because some bunch of prissy, middle class, uber PC Tarquins and Tabithas have sat in a council committee and decided that, for the record, they believe such and such a thing is offensive and decide to impose their solution on everybody as a consequence?
'Cos they know that some dozy bastard with the brains of a rocking horse, somwhere, will want to have a pop at them on the basis of the false belief that it was somehow something to do with them. Imams, cultural and ethnic community leaders across Britain are fed up to the back teeth explaining that they don't want this special treatment decided for them: They'd rather not have the real issues of racial and religious discrimination dealt with, rather than watered down by wet behind the ears liberals every time they feel like screaming racism.
737 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:40:44am |
re: #732 Sharmuta
I have stated that I am aware that there is actual racism in the world. That doesn't mitigate that the term itself is overused and misused. That is (and has been ) my point from the beggining
If I haven't stated that, please show me where I state that racism does NOT exist. I will make amends, because it does!
738 | Wishbone Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:49:01am |
re: #729 bloodnok
I don't 'fear' any such thing Bloodnok. It's already happened and every day I have to read and bear witness to the consequences of losing sight of the concrete issues, rather than those perceived in the minds of the over cautious. Can you imagine being arrested because you happened to have a discussion wherein you disagreed with a person on a matter of religious doctrine?. Can you imagine living in a society whereby exercising your right to silence is, in itself, a criminal act? Can you imagine living in a society where someone can try sticking a knife in you and it's you that gets arrested if you should somehow manage to reverse that fate upon your attacker?
Concrete issues, Bloodnok. You need to deal with your crazies, but overcompensate at your peril.
739 | Charles Johnson Mon, Sep 28, 2009 10:51:22am |
re: #736 Wishbone
Sure, it's possible to overcompensate and declare things "racist" in order to exert control. That's not at all what I'm talking about. There is a very real, very serious, and very dangerous undercurrent of racism in the opposition to President Obama, and it's becoming more and more open on the right wing.