LGF

-RetweetFlight 93 Memorial Still an Islamofascist Shrine

Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 7:58:57 pm PST

Earlier today, mainstream media (aka the New York Times and Associated Press) told us that the Flight 93 “Crescent of Embrace” memorial had been (grudgingly) redesigned to remove its incredibly offensive inclusion of the religious symbol of the 9/11 hijackers.

At Error Theory, Alec Rawls says it’s a trick: Redesigned Flight 93 memorial still an Islamo-fascist shrine.

The redesigned flight 93 memorial, announced today, still contains all of the features that made it a terrorist memorial. Architect Paul Murdoch’s infamous red crescent is still there, still planted with red maple trees, still inscribed in the exact same circle as before, and with the same two crescent tips still intact. Thus the crescent bisector defined by these crescent tips is also the same as before. It still points almost exactly to Mecca, making the crescent a Mihrab (an Islamic prayer station, where the believer faces into a crescent, towards Mecca, to perform his ritual prostrations). The design still incorporates a separate upper terrorist-memorial wall, centered precisely on the red-maple crescent. There are still 44 translucent blocks on the flight path to the crash site, matching the total number of dead, instead of just the forty translucent blocks that are dedicated to the forty murdered Americans. Lastly, the Tower of Voices part of the memorial is still an Islamic prayer-time sundial.

Advertisement

522 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:00:53pm
2 Dirk Diggler  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:02:28pm

Wow Rayra that was DEEP.

3 Bob's Kid  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:03:19pm

So our suspicions are confirmed...looks like it's back to respectful letter writing on this one.

4 big L  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:04:30pm

effers.

5 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:05:41pm

Holy shit. I was just thinking today that this isn't over until the thing is complete, and that we still need to be vigilant.

The fight isn't over, folks.

6 mbruce  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:05:55pm

Why do these people hate themselves sooo much?

7 SuperdaveTWC  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:06:43pm

Well, you know we wouldn't want too make them mad at us, would we? I mean, they might try to kill US servicemembers and even *gasp* US civilians abroad! You know, they may even try to kill Americans in the USA! This is unheard of in 2005!

/sarc off

8 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:06:55pm
9 chewydog  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:06:58pm

#1 Rayra

Don't hold anything back.

10 Jimmy The Clam  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:07:16pm

OK, how do we now get that architect bounced from the project?

11 Americain  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:07:25pm

The fight is still on folks.

Be vigilant.

12 Americain  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:08:18pm

Rayra has me beat on the deepest first post. ;^)

13 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:08:47pm

#6 mbruce

To be fair, if I was as utterly f**ked in the head as the designers, I'd hate myself too.

14 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:08:50pm

On a related topic, I saw a commercial tonight for the Showtime series Sleeper Cell. Has anybody heard anything about this?

15 Rob Thompson  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:09:09pm

Were I a muslim, I believe I would be offended by the use of my religious symbols in connection with the murder of forty people by terrorists claiming to act for me, in the name of my religion.

16 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:09:56pm

It will be a nice dog park, perhaps pot-bellied pigs also.

17 NiceLass  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:10:30pm

OMG this gets more unbelievable by the day. Is there any way to get a massive petition going?

18 jimmytheclaw  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:11:19pm

#3 Bob's Kid 11/30/2005 08:03PM PST

So our suspicions are confirmed...looks like it's back to respectful letter writing on this one.


respectful?

19 carefulnow  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:11:20pm

Who do we write to?

Who is behind this travesty? Who chose this architect and why is he doing radical islam's bidding? Who's going to put up with it?

20 Brutus  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:11:31pm
There are still 44 translucent blocks on the flight path to the crash site, matching the total number of dead, instead of just the forty translucent blocks that are dedicated to the forty murdered Americans.

Spraypaint "Muslim Terrorist" on four of the translucent blocks.

21 Belize042  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:12:00pm

Color me shocked; elitest "artist" and company revel in putting one over on us proles. And how proud he must be of his "inclusive" move, using 44 translucent blocks to count the terrorists among the victims.

Thank goodness for the internet. We'll get the word out, even if the MSM won't.

22 yesandno  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:12:21pm

Contemptable only begins to describe it...

23 Jimmy The Clam  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:12:49pm

#17 NiceLass

Internet petitions tend to do nothing. We need to find out who has the authority to replace this architect and lean on him/her/them... HARD.

He just needs to be gone.

24 jimmytheclaw  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:12:58pm

also 44 blocks WTF that includes the 4 goat fucking murderers

25 ferris  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:13:25pm

This is unbelievable.

Who 'owns' this memorial?

I think it's time to launch a takeover. It happened with the inaptly named 'International Freedom Center' and it needs to happen here.

Look, they don't fear 'us' like they fear Islamic Terrorists. We aren't going to kill anyone. But, we need to get them where it hurts, thier funding, thier status, etc.

26 Jimmy The Clam  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:13:36pm

Hey Claw Man! :)

27 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:13:59pm

Wow, that's some serious analysis, prayer times will be marked by the sun and everything. The artist spent a lot of time making sure to please our enemies.

By the way, why does the federal government fund art? Sort of like education, there are a huge number of problems which go away if it's left to the private sector. In the case of education, poor people could get education stamps where the feds pay the school.

28 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:14:04pm

We need a Take Back the Memorial-style group to spearhead the effort to derail this abomination.

29 Dirk Diggler  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:14:44pm

Perhaps the cruelest cut of all...

There are still 44 translucent blocks on the flight path to the crash site, matching the total number of dead, instead of just the forty translucent blocks that are dedicated to the forty murdered Americans.

I loathe the times we live in. A memorial that "embraces" the murderers as well as the murdered should be burned down.

Who the hell's idea was this, really? Perhaps the Pajamas media squad could look into who's funding this obscenity. My guess is that somehow, somewhere the Saudis stepped in and wrote a very big check.

30 dak  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:15:15pm
It still points almost exactly to Mecca

IT SHOULD.

31 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:15:58pm

Isn't there an organization of the Flight 93 families?

32 ferris  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:16:34pm

Information on who runs this memorial site here.

Get a load of this:

The National Park Service is involved in all aspects of the planning and design of the memorial and will administer the Flight 93 National Memorial as a unit of the National Park System. The National Park Service will be the agency under which the Advisory Commission will operate.

Hello Senator Santorum?


Park Service Contacts:
Contact Us


General Correspondence
By Mail
National Park Service
109 West Main Street, Suite 104
Somerset, PA 15501-2035

By Phone
Superintendent - Flight 93 National Memorial
(814) 443-4557

By Fax
(814)443-2180

33 The Bruce  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:16:57pm

Bob's Kid:

looks like it's back to respectful letter writing on this one.

Don't think you get it--respectful letter writing got us nothing. We're way past letter writing at this point.

34 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:19:05pm

It's still on private land, right? Let's talk to the owners. This is a slap in the face. There's no two ways about it. This is like raping dead heros.

35 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:19:15pm

#33 The Bruce

Hey, be nice to Bob's Kid. Her dad just passed away.

36 The False God  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:19:18pm
It still points almost exactly to Mecca

IT SHOULD.

It should point at Mecca, but the crescent should be replaced by the shape of either a cruise missile or a pig.

37 Radian  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:19:26pm

perfect project for Picloram..

Good bye trees and grass...

38 Belize042  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:19:32pm

#30 dak
It still points almost exactly to Mecca

IT SHOULD.

Heh. Good point. But it should be a giant, accusing finger pointing east.

39 jimmytheclaw  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:19:43pm

#26 Jimmy The Clam 11/30/2005 08:13PM PST

Hey Claw Man! :)

huh? i'm innocent i say innocent.

Who the hell's idea was this, really? Perhaps the Pajamas media squad could look into who's funding this obscenity. My guess is that somehow, somewhere the Saudis stepped in and wrote a very big check.

if i recall correctly tides foundation was involved

40 dak  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:20:52pm

# 36 and 38

Or a Minuteman

41 Roger  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:21:45pm

#34 Portolan, there is no private property. The government just lets us stay on their land.

42 little boomer  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:21:50pm

Yeah, 4 of those translucent blocks will be vandalized regularly.
This is such an insult to the nation.

43 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:21:50pm

#38 Belize042

But it should be a giant, accusing finger pointing east.

Damn straight it should.

44 kingronjo  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:22:57pm

I think thats right, get Santorum on this. Possibly also one of the Repub's running for Governor can make this an issue. Just my thoughts

45 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:23:06pm

#41 Roger

Kelo legalized that.

46 jhn1  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:23:32pm

The only solution is to completely defund every organization (and remove all authority over the site) involved in approving the first plan and demonize them to the point where the next group fears for their very livelyhood to propose such a travesty again.

47 Satan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:23:54pm

#30 dak,

Only if the put a fucking MX-Peacekeeper there. This is beyond absurd. When are the goddamn Republicans going to grow a set of balls?

48 mich-again  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:24:10pm

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?

What is their major malfunction? Don't they know that their F-ing trees will die a horrible death if they plant them in the shape of an Islamic crescent?

What kind of memorial would a bunch of dead trees make?

49 BingoBunny  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:24:14pm

The LLL crazys actually claim theres no proof that the Islamics on board carried out a plot to hi-jack the plane.. and that the CIA destroyed it with a bomb.. to make a reason to attack Iraq. I'm sure thats why there are 44 blocks.. to honor the murdered, a few years of LLL rule and they will have it taught in our colleges that way.

/sick bast***s, we'll have to have martial law I guess, to round up the usual suspects in America to ever win this war.

50 The Bruce  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:24:54pm

If the National Park Service actually implements this act of sedition, what do you think will be the response? Will there finally be organized resistance to subversion by the Left and the Islamofascists within the US?

51 Americain  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:26:37pm

#48 mich-again

Don't they know that their F-ing trees will die a horrible death if they plant them in the shape of an Islamic crescent?

And the tree's offshoots will be deformed from inbreeding.

52 dak  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:26:42pm

#47

I think they got rid of the Peacekeeper, but ask Reaganite.

Unfortunately, the Republicans have the balls in the US, not the Dems. But too much balls is not always a good thing. Else you wind up too far right and unelectable.

Look at waht happened to the Dems with their far left BS...

53 freedomplow  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:27:21pm

Are they the same shape?

Flip this picture over...

[Link: www.spaceimagingme.com...]

Then compare it with the big pond at the memorial.

[Link: photos1.blogger.com...]

Then tell me if I need new aluminum foil, I can take it.

54 carefulnow  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:27:44pm

Nosing around a little, I came upon this article announcing the selection of Paul Murdoch's design. It references Zombie and it states:

The jury report anticipated the possibility for misinterpretation, and had recommended that the design team “Consider the interpretation and impact of words within the context of this event. The 'Crescent' should be referred to as the 'circle' or 'arc' or other words that are not tied to specific religious iconography."

Doesn't that make you feel better? It didn't me either.

55 Iron Fist[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:28:23pm
56 the drill sgt  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:28:44pm

Why do we need an artsy monument anyway. These were war dead. 40 of them. All over Europe, and New England in village squares you can see that classic granite pillar.

Pillar
inscribed with 40 names
"Let's Roll"
9/11/2001

You can build that monument for 50k

simple and elegant

57 dak  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:29:08pm

#53

That little Borg cube in the middle looks like a good aim point.

58 denbike  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:30:04pm

Wait a minute, are we being to judgmental here? Nahh.

The property is still in private ownership with negotiations ongoing. Set up a 501c3 to compete on the project.

My nomination for a memorial is a giant beverage cart with a broken arm crushed underneath holding a boxcutter. Engraved: Let's Roll.

59 Roger  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:30:24pm

#53 freedomplow, get yer tin foil then because the first picture does not resemble:
ERROR
The requested URL could not be retrieved

While trying to retrieve the URL: [Link: localhost:10141...]

The following error was encountered:

* Access Denied.

Access control configuration prevents your request from being allowed at this time. Please contact your service provider if you feel this is incorrect.

Your cache administrator is webmaster.
:-)

60 Bob's Kid  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:30:33pm
respectful?

And outraged, of course.

61 mattm  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:31:25pm

Why don't we just gove out a Free Koran to the visitors. After all it was America's fault thaey they attacked us.

/LLL

62 dak  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:31:29pm

#56

What is wrong with just CROSSES, and if any Jewish in there, Stars of David?

That is accepted way of honoring the dead.

63 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:32:23pm

#57 dak

I was thinking, "Target-Rich Environment".

64 Broomer  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:32:23pm

Loved the idea of sculpture of a beverage cart and a cellphone as a memorial.

Put that side by side of the monstrosity of the "official" memorial and this alternative site will get most of the souveniers.

JG

65 Iron Fist[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:32:36pm
66 dak  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:33:02pm

#63

Yes, goes without saying...

67 Bad Penny  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:33:29pm

The only way they're going to change this is if we start sawing off heads. That's the proven technique for getting what you want.

68 Apu Pibat  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:34:15pm

#39 jimmytheclaw

Ah yes, the Tides Foundation. Nothing more than a lefty money-laundering organization.

Profile here: http://www.activistcash.com

69 Catttt  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:34:40pm

Thanks for posting this, Charles. People were talking about it earlier.

Even if it were not Islamofascist, it would still be new age wind chimy feel-good nonsense instead of a tribute to the bravery of these people in the face of death. The people in charge of art in this country are so feel goody/new age - even if (and that's a big if) the Islamofascist embracement is an accident or some horrible coincidence/synchronicity, getting a tribute to bravery/courage/name your old fashioned value will be hard. But - we must try.

70 freedomplow  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:35:30pm

#59 Roger

Works for me. I'll try to figure out what happened.

71 Bob's Kid  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:36:00pm
Hey, be nice to Bob's Kid. Her dad just passed away.

Thanks, Ward.

But I do think respectful will get farther than letters and phone calls spouting obscenities, however well deserved they might be. Messages like that are seldom taken seriously. And they need to be taken very seriously.

72 Catttt  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:36:34pm

Wonders aloud if paint ball will be allowed at the site.

73 Iron Fist[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:36:59pm
74 legalpad  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:37:32pm

The goal should be to get this Murdock *** off the project. He's obviously dishonest.

75 dak  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:38:00pm

#65

I know what you're saying, but remember this is what every latte-slurping commie pinko Dem (not to mention Bin Ladin and Co.) thought the US would react after 9/11.

But Bush went with a smarter approach. He's raising lots more hell for the bad guys and "allies" this way. It'll take time though.

76 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:38:27pm

#32, #44

Santorum doesn't have any balls. Last year he supported Arlen Specter over Toomey. He could ave supported another pro-life Republican, but chose the quisling instead.

Rick Santorum will have the fight of his life on his hands next year, with the pro-life Dem Casey running against him.

77 The Bruce  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:39:10pm

This is a test of our national resolve. If it stands, we fall.

78 Roger  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:40:07pm

#56 the drill sgt, exactly!

79 the drill sgt  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:40:16pm

73 Iron fist,

It is PA, a Liberty bell works for me. ring it on 9/11 40 times

80 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:40:42pm

#71 Bob's Kid

But I do think respectful will get farther than letters and phone calls spouting obscenities, however well deserved they might be. Messages like that are seldom taken seriously. And they need to be taken very seriously.

I agree. Somebody big like Rush or Sean Hannity needs to take up this case.

81 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:41:37pm

#77 The Bruce

Exactly.

82 Apu Pibat  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:42:05pm

Re: my post at #68

I should mention that one of the biggest collaborators with the Tides foundation is Theresa Heinz Kerry.

Ya know, that drunken wench who's married to the loser from Massachusetts who nearly managed to become President.

I'm surprised that never came out during the campaign. I think people might have been interested to know that the possible First Lady is involved with a money laundering organization that lets LLLefties contribute to borderline radical LLLefty organizations without having their names attached to their donations.

83 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:42:23pm

Oh God, Maureen Dowd is going to be on Letterman tonight.

84 tigger2005  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:43:44pm

# 25 ferris

You know, the Rev. Fred Phelps has terrorized Topeka for years, and he hasn't hurt or physically attacked anyone. He sues and harasses and just wears people down, makes their lives a living hell.

As much as I despise Phelps, maybe we need to adopt his aggressive (yet, apparently, entirely legal) tactics. We won't kill or physically assault these reporters and actors and "artists" who hate America and are indirectly helping to get our soldiers (and eventually, more American civilians) killed, but we have to do SOMETHING to shut them up, and letter writing is not going to hack it. We have to find perfectly legal ways to make their lives absolutely miserable, to let them have not a moment's peace. And we especially need to find ways to hit their pocketbooks, HARD. They need to be made to pay.

This is not a matter of chilling free speech. It is a matter of saving lives and saving the free world from Islamic fascist domination.

85 gunslingah  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:44:59pm
There are still 44 translucent blocks on the flight path to the crash site, matching the total number of dead

This is the most absurd part. To memorialize the hijackers is like redesigning the USS Arizona memorial at Pearl Harbor to include the names of the Japanese aircrews and submariners who perished during the attack.

86 jcm  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:45:32pm

One of the most effect tools is a handwritten note. That shows more effort and thought went into the note. I be writing the President, Veep and my congressional delegation on this one.

87 lowandslow  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:45:55pm

#83 Ward Cleaver

Oh God, Maureen Dowd is going to be on Letterman tonight.

Why? Doesn't she know Dave has a live in girlfriend.

88 littlemissmuffit  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:46:12pm

This makes me sick. What is even worse is that the MSM will not even touch this. Most people I know don't even know about this sick, sorry excuse of a memorial. What can I do? I didn't believe it when they said they they were changing it. This really doesn't suprise me at all.

89 Amalie  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:46:18pm
 #83

Ward Cleaver  11/30/2005 08:42PM PST

Oh God, Maureen Dowd is going to be on Letterman tonight.

It's official. Letterman has scraped the bottom of the barrel for guests.

90 jimmytheclaw  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:47:16pm

#80 Ward Cleaver 11/30/2005 08:40PM PST

#71 Bob's Kid

But I do think respectful will get farther than letters and phone calls spouting obscenities, however well deserved they might be. Messages like that are seldom taken seriously. And they need to be taken very seriously.

I agree. Somebody big like Rush or Sean Hannity needs to take up this case.

i just put up a link on one of seans threads after emailing links out

91 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:48:29pm

#85 gunslingah

The whole damn thing is absurd. The islamic apologists aren't even trying to hide their intentions.

92 hithere  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:49:18pm

The architectural drawings don't show the 10'x10' designated free speech area that the Park Service provides. I hope the more meaningful memorial isn't forced to take up residence on that tiny plot.

93 Amalie  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:49:56pm
 #83
Ward Cleaver  11/30/2005 08:42PM PST

Oh God, Maureen Dowd is going to be on Letterman tonight.

Will she do some stupid pet trick?

/take it away, boys..

94 Bad Penny  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:50:28pm
Maureen Dowd is going to be on Letterman tonight.

She was on Fergeson's (after Letterman) last week. She was going on about how she grew up wanting to be like Hepburn in those Pat and Mike movies and have a man she could trade verbal barbs with all the time. Fergeson said "Not me, I'd rather be with someone who likes me."

95 John Schneider  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:50:50pm

Here's my idea of a great memorial, but it needs to be over a certain middle eastern city, over a big black rock...

/sorry, this kind of "art" makes me pissed off all over again...

96 MJ  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:51:41pm

If I didn't know better, I'd be thinking that the National Park Service had been absorbed by the State Department.

This is thoroughly outrageous. Perhaps the National Park Service is thinking of adding a statue of Hitler to the World War II memorial.Why not? It's same mentality. Everyone is a victim, right?

These people are pricks...the design firm and anyone connected with the Government agency which approved of this monstrosity.

97 freedomplow  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:52:03pm

83 Ward Cleaver

Liberal Night Tonight on Late Night Shows: Dowd, Dean, Pelosi...

[Link: newsbusters.org...]


Full force of the moonbats tonight.

98 Mr. Beamish  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:52:03pm
Architect Paul Murdoch’s infamous red crescent is still there, still planted with red maple trees

Nothing the creative use of a few gallons of gasoline and a book of matches couldn't fix.

99 grayp  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:53:26pm

#76 WArd Cleaver

Santorum doesn't have any balls. Last year he supported Arlen Specter over Toomey. He could ave supported another pro-life Republican, but chose the quisling instead.


Get a clue. Toomey would have had no seniority with the requisite perks to hand out to Santorum. Specter has tons.

Listen to yourself. Specter is a 'quisling' but got re-elected easily after the rough primary with Toomey. Santorum is a staunch conservative and is in the fight of his life against Casey.

The Specter/Toomey fight was a conversation w/in the Republican party in Pennsylvania.

The Santorum/Casey fight is not Dem vs. Repub. It's 'moderate vs. right-wing', Casey being the moderate.

There are other issues that are not related to policy per se.

Santorum treats his constiuents like lackeys. He is an arrogant, self-righteous, pompous ass.

One-on-one, the man is insufferable. I've wanted to punch him in the face just on general principles.

Specter is also arrogant. But he loves a good argument and in my experience has never taken offence at being told he's out of line.

Not that he listens. Specter is at times hard to take but he can be fun.

Santorum is just a prick with a title.

100 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:54:28pm

OT

Europe's woman suicide bomber

Police in Belgium and France launched a series of raids yesterday against a suspected terrorist network after a Belgian-born convert to Islam blew herself up in Baghdad, becoming Europe's first woman suicide bomber.

More than 200 officers arrested 15 suspects in four cities three weeks after the 38-year-old woman, who converted to Islam after marrying a Moroccan Islamist radical, earned her grisly place in history.

According to De Standaard, Belgium's main Flemish newspaper, the woman attempted to target a US military convoy south of Baghdad on November 9. A US official told the paper that she was the only person who died, but other media reports spoke of five or six deaths.

101 ProUSA  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:54:45pm

I don't think Murdoch and the other artsy pricks are afraid of the Muslims. I think they feel sorry for them and want to reach out. In their minds, t is very big of the libs to maek such a monument honoring the event and all that died. After all, the terrorist would not have killed our citizens if we didn't ask for it in the first place. The USA is at fault.

They are elitist a-holes. Murdoch still claims his design was misinterpretted. OK, if I ignore my common sense and give him the benefit of the doubt, after the first wave of outrage, you would think he woudl be smart enough to avoid anything that could be interpreted as pro-Islam.

My guess is that there is either serious money from the left / CAIR types, and Murdoch is so arrogant the he does not want to change things much. If he did, it would admit his art should not have won the contest.

102 lowandslow  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:55:28pm

#98 Mr. Beamish

Nothing the creative use of a few gallons of gasoline and a book of matches couldn't fix.

Don't waste good maples, just take a chainsaw, I doubt anyone would stop you.

103 denbike  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:55:44pm

In the best case scenario these designers are oblivious and/or insensative to the fundamental design concepts. These passengers were the first people to realize what we are up against, they died rather than see the larger destruction and death that would have occurred had they stayed in their seats.

104 Manzanita and Sage  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:55:46pm

Wow! These designers have a lot of nerve.

What can they be thinking!
Possibilities:

1) Americans are really clueless.

2) The MSM will never notice or report this. (Which I can't understand, since these newspapers have been blatantly deceived by these numbskulls.)

3) Bloggers? What are those?

4) People who love America? They don't exist, afterall I've never met one.

5) We are artists! You are pop culture loving fools who could never understand "true genius."

6) We are inspired by the symbols of Islam. What better way to memorialize the four who were thwarted from completing their mission.

Honestly, I don't which choice it is.

105 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:58:00pm

It is possible to argue that the entire thing should be all about Islam. The 'artist' probably will change it if we look at it like that.

106 repjew  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 6:59:54pm

According to the National Geographic Documentary from this summer, the first passenger murdered to scare the other passengers into submission was the only Jew on board (a businessman sitting in first class)

107 Acesover8ts  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:00:44pm

62# What is wrong with just CROSSES, and if any Jewish in there, Stars of David?

Well one reason is that crosses will offend the muslum hi-jackers. The park service is going to take care of this. Lets see, this should employ about a thousand people. They will probably hire a couple hundred muslums so to have them inclusive in our national tragedy.

108 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:01:46pm

Letterman's already had Joe Wilson on before.

109 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:03:26pm

#107 Acesover8ts

They will probably hire a couple hundred muslums so to have them inclusive in our national tragedy.

The muslims are the cause of our national tragedy.

110 metal man  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:04:00pm

Christmas trees in the public square are questionable but forcing Islamic crap in a memorial for those who died by Islamofacists handywork is OK.
@$$#

111 Minstrel  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:04:02pm

I like the granite pillar idea.

Another would be a bronze eagle taking off from a rock with a broken scimitar in its talons.

112 Gagdad Bob  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:04:09pm

We already have a Museum of Tolerance. Now we'll have Museum of the Intolerable.

113 gymnast  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:04:20pm

Somebody, in a senior official position, ought to inform the designers of this "memorial" and the committee that approved the design that a lot of Americans are rather displeased about their "Memorial" to the hijackers and murderers of 9-11. The last word on this subject has not yet been heard and I would not want to be one of those that it is directed at. As for the Park Service, this is the time of year that they send their clown suits out for dry cleaning so they aren't too easy to spot against the lll background. You can still recognize them however, for they are the cretins running around with both hands covering their ass.

114 steve  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:04:49pm

Let them plant the trees. Trees can be cut down and made into useful objects. i.e. pews for churches, pulpits for the pastor, collection plates etc, etc.

115 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:04:50pm

#83 Ward Cleaver

Top 10 List of Why I Stopped Watching Letterman A Long Time Ago:

10. Punchlines consist of Letterman saying something obvious loudly 3 times.
9. Paul Schaffer.
8. Lame Inside jokes.
7. Sick of hearing about his kid.
6. Paul Schaffer's Band.
5. No more Larry "Bud" Melman
4. Gratuitous ass-kissing of guests.
3. Letterman still hasn't owned up to the ass hair transplant.
2. Was once hip, now just artificial hip.
1. Waste of time.

116 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:06:02pm

#99 grayp

I know, Specter's got plenty of juice, but I can't stand him. I can't stand Santorum, either. I get the impression that he's about as effective as a piece of furniture.

117 The Rebbitzen  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:06:09pm

Reading that article back there, it said the final decision will ultimately be made by the Secretary of the Interior. Anyone know who that is? That's who we should write to.

118 The Rebbitzen  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:06:59pm

Sorry--the linky to the article is back on post #54

119 steve  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:07:42pm

#115 Portolan: could not have expressed it better. I personnally watch or even want to watch Lettermen for at least 10 years, give or take a few.

120 NY Nana  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:08:22pm

#89 Amalie

I will not watch him any more...he is pathetic, and perfect for SeeBS; his guests, and he are so LLL now, that the show is Air America, on TV.

Mikey Moore and Janeane Garofalo and their ilk? Fuhgetaboutit.

And another OT re Israel, for the delusional few who think that the Jews expelled from Israel by PM Sharon are living the good life: Airlift For Disengagement Refugees Arrives From America

Over three tons of clothing and goods for Jews expelled from their homes in Gaza and northern Samaria last summer arrived Tuesday on an airlift sent by Americans Jews and gentiles.

...”For 100 days the refugees have been living in hotels and tent cities,” Lieberman said. “They are still there and many have not even arrived at interim solutions, so their possessions are still all locked up in warehouses. All electronic devices have been ruined by the heat and rats have eaten much of their clothing. Aside from that, the government rules that if someone opens their shipping container they must empty it completely and give it back - even though they have no place to put anything.”...

Please read article...it is both yet another disgrace on the part of Sharon's, and a tragedy that I never thought would or could happen to Jews in the Jewish homeland, done to them by a Jew. Some Jew.

I will now go and punch out a wall.

121 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:08:38pm

Gale Norton?
Woo-hoo!

122 metal man  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:09:05pm

#111 Minstrel
Your post made me think a Phoenix rising from the ashes and laying waste to it's enemies would be good also but don't know how that could be portrayed.

123 average_guy  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:10:14pm

I think that this goes deeper than just the architect. Regarding the architect though, if you read the whole article that is linked here, he really did his homework on this, or had a lot of help from those whose sympathies lie with the terrorists.

124 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:10:40pm
125 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:11:19pm

#90 jimmytheclaw

Yeah, I sent Sean an email, and included the Error Theory" link.

126 The Rebbitzen  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:11:19pm

She looks like she has a fun job, petting baby birds and such.

127 Ojoe  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:12:30pm

I am an Architect. I'm qualified to say this:

This design stinks. Memorializing 4 murderers equally with the murdered? It's treasonous design.

Todd Beamer howls from the dead in protest.

Throw it all out and hire someone else with common sense.

128 gymnast  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:13:03pm

#122, metal man. Thats an easy one. An Eagle shitting on the Kaba.

129 steve  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:13:27pm

Trees can be cut down. Let them plant them!

130 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:13:42pm
131 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:14:18pm

#124 Rayra

Yeah, the local news here (DFW) was talking about the Crackberry story. I thought they were going to be shut off (patent suit) a couple of years ago; it could really happen now.

132 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:14:20pm

#126 The Rebbitzen

She looks like she has a fun job, petting baby birds and such.


She oversees one of the next giant extinctions of humanity: Yellowstone National Park / monsterous caldera. Toba is the Muslim version. They've had some bad luck over there recently.

133 Robert D  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:14:35pm

#15 Rob Thompson

I just stepped in, but, that is the point. There seems to be no peaceful muslims to denounce anything...

134 nagasaki_hata  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:14:49pm

NY Nana

Please read article...it is both yet another disgrace on the part of Sharon's, and a tragedy that I never thought would or could happen to Jews in the Jewish homeland, done to them by a Jew. Some Jew.

I will now go and punch out a wall.

how about this---

[Link: www.ynetnews.com...]

135 gunslingah  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:15:00pm

In my previous post (#85), I compared this proposed Flight 93 memorial to including the names of Japanese sailors and airmen killed during the Pearl Harbor attack on the USS Airzona memorial.

I apologize; that was unfair (to the Japanese). While the Japanese were carrying out a surprise attack (dirty pool), they were, at least, attacking a legitimate military target.

No, including the hijackers on the Flight 93 memorial is more akin to modifying the memorials at Auschwitz, Dachau, etc., to include the names of the Nazi SS guards killed as Allied troops were liberating the places.

Beyond belief.

136 Hyphen  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:15:32pm

Here's the gov page for the Secretary of the Interior, Gale A. Norton. I believe this is the person to voice our disgust of this crescent *spit* of embrace.

137 Ojoe  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:15:36pm

I propose a giant steamroller for starters.

138 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:15:59pm

#130 Rayra

No freakin' coincidence there. I'm just glad that Stewart got stuck with the hag Pelosi.

139 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:16:03pm

#130 Rayra

Kind of like the timing of something like 'Commander in Chief'?

140 Hyphen  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:16:30pm

#121 Beagle,

You beat me to it. :)

141 wee fury  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:16:40pm

On today's previous Flight 93 Memorial thread
#122 Zombie linked the NPS Flight 93 Memorial page -- which shows the revamped design.
To me, it no longer looks like a crescent -- it looks like a circle with a path leading up to it.
I am still not fond of the design but I do feel that the crescent shaped memorial has been eradicated.

142 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:16:40pm

A full press assault on the American public.

143 lowandslow  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:16:46pm

#124 Rayra
Thats the second time I've seen "fact check" today. Check out the URL from yahoo for this sick f*cking AP article, Bush Attempts Hard Sell on Iraq Progress .
Notice the 'iraq_fact_check' in the URL.

144 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:17:01pm

#124 Rayra

The venom is so out in the open they're driving away independents and moderates. Let them steam to boiling over.

Bad news for their views on abortion: "viability" is moving down in weeks, and sonograms.

Just an observation, not making an argument.

145 Earth2moonbat  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:17:02pm

#127 Ojoe

Agreed. I believe that the architect is just doing what he's being paid to do, though. If there was money to be made in a decent monument, that's what we'd get. This is the crap that we're getting because this is what the money behind the project (read: Heinz foundation) wants.

146 ibu guru  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:17:17pm

OT

Belgian woman verified as a homicide bomber in Iraq.

first time that a European has been confirmed as a suicide bomber

She "married a radical Islamic man and converted to Islam after her marriage..."

Perhaps the best thing that can be said about this is at least she's dead and won't be breeding more such POS.

147 Catttt  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:17:42pm

Here is a good article from September by Michelle Malkin that says what I think.

I am not an architect, but here is my 9/11 architectural philosophy: War memorials should memorialize war. If you want peace and understanding and healing and good will toward all, go build Kabbalah centers.

Please, for the sake of those who have sacrificed, let's put the design of war memorials in the hands of creative people committed to erecting monuments of courage over capitulation.
...
A proper war memorial stirs to anger and action. We all remember passenger Todd Beamer's last heard words as he and his fellow Americans prepared to take back the plane from al Qaeda's killers, don't we?

No, the phrase wasn't "Let's meditate." It was "Let's roll."

148 antiquebob  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:18:12pm

This is just so unbelievable.
How did all this ever happen, that we have gotten to this? We seem to have to fight on so many fronts, with new ones every day, it jsut gets tiring at times!

I's just totally unacceptable to have anything remotely related to Islam as part of the memorial.

What is an effective way to oppose this? Who controls the project, and where can letters be written?

149 zombie  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:18:26pm
#54 carefulnow
Nosing around a little, I came upon this article announcing the selection of Paul Murdoch's design. It references Zombie

Wow, Architectural Record really does read me:

Shortly after the winning design was announced, the use of the red crescent in the design drew criticism from some religious groups and online blogs. As noted on the conservative blog Zombietime. “The winning design chosen to memorialize the heroes and victims of 9/11’s Flight 93 is in the shape of a red crescent that looks–either accidentally or intentionally–remarkably like an Islamic crescent.”

I maybe should pay more attention to media coverage of zombietime -- I long ago gave up keeping track of it.

150 aunursa  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:19:55pm
instead of just the forty translucent blocks that are dedicated to the forty murdered Americans.

Well actually there were 38 murdered Americans and two foreigners. Christian Adams, deputy director of the German Wine Institute, was flying to San Francisco for a wine-tasting event. Toshiya Kuge, an engineering student at Waseda University in Tokyo, was returning home after visiting colleges in the U.S. and Canada.

151 gymnast  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:20:07pm

#132, beagle. Hush yo mouth boy, I live too close to that place to treat it frivolously. I don't fancy the idea of going into orbit with a couple of bears and no rocket ship.

152 Ojoe  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:21:25pm

Let's remember that Todd Beamer doesn't even have, I think, the luxury of a grave. This field is where he died. Let's have some respect here.

153 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:21:52pm

#143 lowandslow

Another example of open bias I posted earlier. People aren't as stupid as they think we are. But no amount of polling on the media's reputation will change their minds. They are somewhere between sex offenders and lawyers.

154 wee fury  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:22:40pm

#149 Zombie
My #141 just mentioned your earlier post link.

155 Bob's Kid  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:24:18pm
I am an Architect. I'm qualified to say this:

I'm not an architect, but I did major in anthropology, and Kroeber Hall at Cal is spittin' distance from the architecture building, which must give some sort of design creds.

And I say it stinks, too. Worse than a litterbox that is waaay overdue for a change.

156 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:24:28pm

#151 gymnast

I don't fancy the idea of going into orbit with a couple of bears and no rocket ship.


If you hear USGS say "harmonic tremors" get in your car and pretend you are a NASCAR driver.

157 leftover54  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:24:50pm

OT - I remember some neighborhood "youts"
having more fun than a barrel of monkeys with
primer cord and red maple trees. I don't know
what caused this memory to come flooding back
all these years later...hmmm. I wonder if "boys"
will still be boys in good ol' PA ? There's something
so "American" about 'sploding inanimate objects
on a lazy summer afternoon ! The key words being
inanimate objects ! Of course theres also the sound
of breaking glass that some boys just can't seem to resist ...

"Ain't that America, the home of the free..."

/JC Mellancamp

158 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:25:01pm

#141 wee fury

The points of the cresent have just been camoflaged. It's still a sextant to mecca. There are still blocks for the four terrorists. Like I said in an earlier post, a small victory is not a victory at all when it comes to this.

159 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:25:03pm
160 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:25:20pm

#153 Beagle

They are somewhere between sex offenders and lawyers.

I'd say closer to sex offenders.

They (journalists) should have to register when they move into a neighborhood.

161 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:27:09pm

Maureen Dowd has flabby arms. She better find a husband soon, before she completely falls apart.

162 metal man  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:27:41pm

#128 gymnast
Thats good but would this work in place of the Eagle? Risen Phoenix

163 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:27:44pm

#149 zombie

Yay zombie. You official. You rock.

164 gunslingah  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:27:56pm

#146 ibu guru:


In the past 25 years, about 10 percent of suicide attacks have been carried out by women, newspaper 'Le Soir' reported.
The attacks were exclusively carried out by women from the Middle East or South-East Asia, but now western women are starting to carry out suicide bombings.

If true, this definitely defeats the argument we sometimes see (from people such as Ann Coulter, etc.) that airport security and such should focus solely on profiling "Middle Eastern males". Yes?

165 leftover54  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:27:57pm

OT - Dowd - wouldn't ... her with Nodrogs
member...

166 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:28:16pm

I understand everyone's feelings running hot, but think about having this abomination in place. What better encapsulates the Left's treachery than a monument to the 9/11 hijackers which is supposedly too tricky for people to figure out? You have it all in one package: the treachery, and the haughty, paternal attitude.

167 Earth2moonbat  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:28:19pm

155 Bob's Kid

And I say it stinks, too. Worse than a litterbox that is waaay overdue for a change.

BTW - how are the kitties? Still have all of them?

168 gymnast  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:28:36pm

#156, beagle. I was thinking more along the lines of formula 1 in that situation. I just hope that I am not sailing on Yellowstone lake when it starts to boil.

169 Rob Thompson  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:28:36pm

#133 Robert D.

I just think that defining a context under which Muslims can deny terrorism, rather than leaving the religious arguments wholly the territory of the terrorists, could only be to the west's advantage, and complaints from muslims on religious grounds might well be a key factor in keeping this memorial from being built.

But it's just my two cents.

170 thefrollickingmole  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:28:40pm

How is it possible in the US for a poodle shagging, gimp mask waering, chicken fellator like this to get such an important commision?
Im in Oz and would like to think that the US hasnt lost its marbles completely.
It would be like the germans making a Holocaust memorial in the shape of a swastika for gods sake.

171 ibu guru  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:28:45pm

#54 careful now

A 15-member jury made up of design professionals, community leaders, and family members selected the design, which will be located in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, where the flight crashed in an open field. The design will be submitted to the Secretary of the Interior for final approval.

I find it hard to believe "family members" would go along with this travesty.

Question: this article appeared in September. Has the Secretary of the Interior approved it?

The most viable step now seems to be pressuring every Senator & Rep to pitch congressional fits with the Secretary of the Interior.

172 grayp  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:29:01pm

#116 Ward Cleaver

know, Specter's got plenty of juice, but I can't stand him. I can't stand Santorum, either. I get the impression that he's about as effective as a piece of furniture.


Well, I've worked with both of them. I understand perfectly the 'I can't stand him" re: Specter - but as far as I can tell he tries really hard to do the right thing. Politicly. He threw our clients over in order to get the Judiciary position so he could influence the SCOTUS nominee hearings. I think he saved the Clarence Thomas nomination. He has consistently had the best staff in the Senate. Recently only Hillary's staff can compare. So, I can understand your sentiments. But he's no angel. Ever wonder why he cited Scottish law to explain why he was voting against Clinton's impeachment?

I have no illusions.

What most people don't know is that his long-time chief-of-staff, Carrie, died of breast cancer during that primary. And he got diagnosed with cancer. She was his anchor and the staff loved her. He hired a replacement and the staff hated the SOB. He was let go about a week ago and no, I won't tell you why. Suffice to say, it was personal ethics.

The big difference between Specter and Santorum that people who are not in the business don't 'get';

Specter never really wanted to be president. Santorum wants it. Bad.

Pennsylvania politics can be none to subtle.

173 Ojoe  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:29:31pm

In the meanwhile, the field could have a bunch of porta-potties oriented toward mecca.

174 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:29:49pm
175 leftover54  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:31:03pm

Dowd..."you only have to remember two words
"Cheney's Guilty" (the Phlame case).

176 Earth2moonbat  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:31:34pm

#164 gunslingah

Try 34%.

They definately are going to need to start checking women, especially ones who look pregnant.

177 Robert D  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:31:56pm

#150 aunursa

Maybe that should be 40 innocent civilians. But I am sure you get the point, don't you?

178 Earth2moonbat  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:33:39pm

174 Rayra

Agreed. What I'm saying is that they were selected precisely because they are carrying water for the Heinz foundation and other moonbats and islamicists. If there wasn't a stacking of the deck going on, a different and decent archetect would have been selected.

179 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:33:52pm
180 Bob's Kid  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:34:26pm
BTW - how are the kitties? Still have all of them?

No, only one. My sis took 2 and a student took the 4th one. They're all fat and sassy, though.

181 hous bin pharteen  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:34:49pm

I think Mr Murdoch needs to be put out of business.

182 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:35:12pm

#165 leftover54

Yeah, me neither. She's turning into Helen Thomas.

183 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:35:14pm
184 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:35:15pm

#166 Beagle

And have this abomination exist just so we can point and say "Oh yeah, that's the left for you."? Sorry, no.

185 hous bin pharteen  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:36:10pm

Can you say congressional investigation?

186 Ed Mahmoud abu al Qahool Martyr Brigades  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:36:10pm

Trouble sleeping, and before I read every comment, the 44 stones, honoring also the 4 dead hijackers, is, beyond any possible doubt about the crescent, the true proof of the worship of the bloody savages who brought about 9-11.

187 Promethea  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:37:18pm

#135 gunslingah . . .

No, including the hijackers on the Flight 93 memorial is more akin to modifying the memorials at Auschwitz, Dachau, etc., to include the names of the Nazi SS guards killed as Allied troops were liberating the places.

What you said.

We are in the midst of a culture war between those who love America and the freedom fighters who make it possible-- and those who hate America because they know deep in their hearts that they don't deserve America's blessings.

The pro-Americans must win this fight. We must NOT allow this Islamofascist memorial to degrade our National Parks.

Or, to put it another way--HEADs must ROLL if this abomination is built. (Written in the spirit of the Islamics who want to kill our way of life.

188 Robert D  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:37:21pm

#169 Rob T

Only if the western world would wake up.

189 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:37:56pm

The only profiling which will work is religious profiling. The kid-glove treatment the media has given Islam will increase the number of weak-willed, cowardly converts (the only kind?). After conversion, they become entitled to special treatment and above us mere dhimmis. Then they get the Eye of the Tiger new converts get and go all splodey.

Osama has been putting reaching out to whitey for years now. Two CA moonbats already, it's working. Throw in the black Muslims and racial profiling isn't going to cut it.

190 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:38:34pm
191 gunslingah  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:40:08pm

#176 Earth2moonbat:

I specifically recall a case from the mid-1980's, when a very pregnant Irish woman attempted to board an El Al jetliner, I think at Heathrow Airport. During security screening, it was discovered that she was carrying a powerful bomb, timed to detonate while the flight was in mid-air. During questioning, it emerged that her boyfriend (and father of her unborn child) was, of all things, a Palestinian, and that he had asked her to carry a package on the flight with her. And, of course, being in love with her boyfriend, and never dreaming of distrusting him, she complied.

Sick.

I've always thought that this incident, in and of itself, discredited the idea that we can achieve airline security merely through profiling males who appear to look "Arab". Nonetheless, you still see the idea crop up with some regularity.

192 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:40:24pm

BWHAHAHAHA!

The Muslim Brotherhood just became "activists" - (AP)

By MAAMOUN YOUSSEF, Associated Press Writer


That's all I read from the AP any more. Author = bias. My favorite is the Shia symp Ali Akbar. You can't make stuff like that up.

193 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:40:35pm

#172 grayp

Thanks grayp, for your insight. I can't see Santorum as pres. I think he's over his head in the Senate. Am I wrong in thinking that?

As a pro-lifer, I can't stand the way other pro-lifers have canonized him. I think you could write "pro-life" on a block of wood and do better than him.

194 leftover54  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:44:06pm

Snarky Dowd "Men are necessary for heavy lifting and breeding" !

Can you imagine a man (even Clinton) going on Letterman and saying women are only good for two things...giving birth and ...take a wild freaking guess. She won a Pulitzer ?

May her batteries go dead and her power be cut off just as she is about to... oh, and the batteries begin to leak.Excuse me. I despise this sorry excuse for a woman ! And I suspect I'm not alone here.

195 hous bin pharteen  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:45:08pm

If this memorial to Osama Bin Laden is built, then this country deserves to fall, for it is in fact to moraly weak to stand up for the freedom so many other Americans fought and died for.

196 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:45:27pm

#184 portolan

And have this abomination exist just so we can point and say "Oh yeah, that's the left for you."? Sorry, no.


If it comes to that, yes. It will be an enduring (maybe) monument to their treason. What could be better? Yes, a real monument to the passengers who fought back. But that isn't in the cards right now.

197 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:45:36pm

#166 Beagle

I don't want to see Todd Beamer's final resting place shit upon in this way.

How could we get in touch with Lisa Beamer? What does she think about this?

She was conspicuously missing from the documentary/re-creation of the Flight 93 takeover.

198 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:46:52pm

#197 Ward Cleaver

I don't want to see Todd Beamer's final resting place shit upon in this way.


Neither do I. If life hands you a pile of crap, compost it.

199 gunslingah  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:46:56pm

#179 Rayra:

Don't be stupid. Because 10% AREN'T "Middle Eastern males"?

No, not because 10% aren't "Middle Eastern males"; because the terrorists aren't quite as stupid as we might like them to be. If they know that we focus 100% of our security efforts on "Middle Eastern males", well, they'll make every possible effort to use operatives who don't fit our profile. As, I think, the links provided by ibu guru and Earth2moonbat make quite clear.

Richard Reid is of Jamaican-English descent.
Jose Padilla is Latin-American.
Johnny Walker Lindh is puro gringo.

You really want to debate counter-terrorism security policy with me?

200 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:47:27pm

#194 leftover54

You're not alone. And her BS about WMDs and Judith Miller? Puh-leeze.

201 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:48:02pm
202 patrickafir  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:48:49pm

Sorry if someone's already mentioned it (I don't have the time to check all the comments right now—sorry!), but I went to the Flight 93 Memorial site, and I couldn't find anything about the 44 translucent blocks (which I find particularly abominable). The "Tower of Voices," though, has 40 chimes (33 passengers and seven crew members). Anyone able to find anything about the 44 blocks?

203 Promethea  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:49:50pm

If this abomination ever gets built, G-d forbid, I thought of a simple way to destroy it--

All visitors who believe this vomitorious "memorial" celebrates Islamofascism and denigrates the heroism of the Americans who fought back and saved our Capitol or White House should bring herbicide to to the site to destroy the red and sugar maple trees planted celebrating Islam and the terrorists who died.

There is NO WAY that the Park Service could police this satanic site adequately. The Park Service has barely enough personelle to police simple sites like the Petrified Forest or the Indiana National Lakeshore.

Just a thought for those of you who are inclined to express themselves in a non-violent, yet direct action mode of expression.

BTW, many FORMER LLLs have studied under the tutelage of Saul Alinsky--the theorist of Direct Action. You know who you are.

204 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:50:28pm

'Night all.

205 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:51:10pm

#196 Beagle

With all due respect, that's not the answer. If this travesty comes to fruitation it will only serve to embolden the fascist sympathizers. Give them an inch and they'll want the whole damn planet. A memorial to the courage of those ordinary citizens should have been in the cards since September 12, 2001. It should still be in the cards right now.

206 jonny  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:51:10pm

OT.

Another victory for the Bloggers:
Fox Holiday Ornaments.

See the UPDATE in the post.

207 Zack  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:51:13pm

Converting hallowed American ground into a dhimmi abomination is akin to the muzz shrines on top of the Temple Mount and Hindu sacred places at Ayodhya. All such abominations should be replaced with structures appropriate to the history and cultural integrity of the locations.
Flight 93 should no more be memorialized with a "crescent of embrace" than Auschwitz with a "swastika of embrace." The cluelessness of the proposal is breathtaking.

208 ibu guru  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:51:39pm

#164 gunslingah

Indeed. The salient characteristic is islamic. I won't say "radical" -- "devout" is more accurate.

209 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:53:45pm

#206 jonny

What? No Laurie Dhue ornaments? Damn.

210 Promethea  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:53:56pm

#170 the frolicingmole . . .

How is it possible in the US for a poodle shagging, gimp mask waering, chicken fellator like this to get such an important commision?
Im in Oz and would like to think that the US hasnt lost its marbles completely.
It would be like the germans making a Holocaust memorial in the shape of a swastika for gods sake.

This sums up the issue very nicely.

211 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:56:03pm

#205 portolan

With all due respect, that's not the answer.


With all due respect back, talking about wrecking it isn't the answer either. I'm sure some of the victims' families aren't up to speed on the not-so subtle message of the Crescent of Embrace, though the title pretty much says it all to anyone with a passing familiarity with Islam.

212 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7:57:24pm
213 reader  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:00:30pm

And how does this honor the dead, those 40 people, none of whom were Muslim? Care to give that one a try, Mr. Murdoch? How is this even American? How does Islam, the very religion of those fervent Muslim terrorists who chose to commit mass murder against non-Muslims that fateful day, fit into and express our values, our beliefs, our national outlook, even our character? I'd really like to see you attempt to answer that. If you had any integrity, any sincere desire to address these real concerns, you would try. So far, I see no explanation, no serious accounting forthcoming. Instead, the only replies that have been released have come with the kind of muted disdain that belies the very artfulness of your intended, though unacknowledged, symbolism.

What you propose is a contradiction in terms, and an insult to every American, and every passenger on that flight. Rather than offer any recognizable symbol of peace, you instead choose to challenge us, not in the way that good art does, through inspiring design and exquisiteness of form, but through the sheer, blunt force of a labored symbolism, the kind of heavyhandedness that neither asks nor implores us to open our hearts and challenge our minds. No, only the subtlety and power of truth imbued by humanity can do that. Instead, we are first asked to consider, in our grief for the fallen and the sadness it impels to somehow look beyond, to reconsider whatever thoughts and feelings we might hold, so that we may only come to "embrace" the very symbol whose religion and believers could never accept us, those of us whose only crime is that we think and believe differently.

Here is the message that I hope is not lost. As Americans, we could never accept, nor tolerate any view or belief that would divide or separate us, and by so doing, would lower one group only to elevate another. The very idea of the infidel, so central to Islam, of a people who deserve to be scorned simply for what they represent rather than who they are, is hateful and repugnant to us. In its essence, it is a spiritual backwardness, and a way of thinking that has shown, through the clear resolution of our history, that it is a path of barrenness that can only lead to our mutual destruction.

214 freedomplow  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:05:17pm

I watched Pelosi on Stewart, Vanden Heuvel on Colbert, Dean on Leno and Dowd on Letterman... (because that's what I do.)

They all bombed.

The full-court press has come down to the extreme left.

They went on comedy shows to explain the WoT.

215 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:07:56pm

#211 Beagle

I wasn't talking about destroying it on the ground. I was talking about stopping before it starts and starting with a new, more appropriate design. My sympathies lay with the victim's families, but if they were made aware of the obvious intent of this so called memorial, I believe that they would be more outraged than us. Beagle, there are so many points of this that point to a islamofascist bias.

216 karch  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:08:47pm

The National Park Service *tried* to run the Presidio in San Francisco when it was converted from an Army base to a business venture in 1994. They were so freaking incompetent, the Feds finally turned the interior (money-making component) over to a Trust. I don't think it's any big secret that Park Rangers are completely removed from reality and should not be given any real responsibility. The fact the design is a disgrace on all counts probably never occured to them. They just thought the trees were pretty.

217 wee fury  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:10:24pm

I stand by my comment of #141
I no longer see a crescent in the redesign.
I see a circle/bowl.
Do not see any mention of the 44 blocks.
See only mention of 40 groves of trees -- each grove with 40 intermixed Red and Sugar Maple. The trees are green spring and summer -- only red in the autumn.
I see no crescent -- no matter how hard I look. And, there would be no crescent visible from the air IMO.

218 zombie  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:10:34pm

OK, let's get down to brass tacks. I've taken screenshots of the new design from the pdf of the newsletter, and uploaded them to my site. I'm also linking here the memorial design images taken from my original report. Let's look at them now:

New design: View from oblique angle

New design: Overhead view

Original design overhead view

Original design overlayed with a prototypical Islamic crescent

My two cents on this is that the changes were minimal, and the memorial is still not too good, but it was altered just enough to make it unlike an actual Islamic crescent. If you look at my gif of the original design you can see that the resemblance is unmistakable. But the new design, while still similar, is different to a degree that makes it not immediately identifiable as an Islamic crescent.

Yes, I know that part of the difference is that they fiddled with the foliage coloring to disguise part of the shape, but first impressions tell me that "Islamic" is not the word that would come to mind upon seeing the new design for the first time.

Of course, all the other criticisms of the design remain valid. It's just that the one single most offensive element has, in my estimation, been substantially mollified.

219 ibu guru  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:12:15pm

#212 Rayra

Arab males aged 18-40 are a valid target for screening -- but that's an incomplete profile. The profile should be expanded.

And I've said for a long time here (and elsewhere) that strict enforcement of our immigration laws would reduce our islamofascist problem by about half. That would be a rather decent start. It would also be a rather decent start on clearing out assorted criminals as well as terrorists and their sympathizers, supporters, aiders-&-abetters. We need a thorough housecleaning, not just targeted airport screening.

220 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:13:45pm

#215 Portolan

I was talking about stopping before it starts and starting with a new, more appropriate design.


That's where we agree. But the 'artist' is convinced a traditional memoral to heros along the lines of the Iwo Jima Memorial just isn't post-modern or deconstructionist enough. So we get the Dog / Pig Park of Embrace instead.

221 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:15:28pm
Flight 93 Memorial Still an Islamofascist Shrine

...There are still 44 translucent blocks on the flight path to the crash site, matching the total number of dead, instead of just the forty translucent blocks that are dedicated to the forty murdered Americans.

Very slight exagguration there.

If this shrine had been designed by real Islamists, there would be only 4 shrine in it that's for sure.

But yes of course this is an outrage. Those fucking assholes should not have included the attackers!

Imagine how the families who lost their loved ones will be offended by the shrine to their murderers!

222 patrickafir  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:16:55pm

Hey, zombie, have you seen anything on the memorial site about the 44 translucent blocks? I haven't, and I'm hoping that means that that idea is scrapped too.

223 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:18:25pm

Damn vowels. Hate them. "Heroes"

If it sounds right in my head, I type it. Then I read it and realize I've had chronic vowel trouble again.

224 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:18:40pm

#218 zombie

Hold on, it looks identical to me!

The only thing they changed was the words they use to describe it as far as I can tell.

225 chewydog  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:19:04pm
Somebody big like Rush or Sean Hannity needs to take up this case.

I wouldn't hold my breath on that one. Especially Hannity. The first sniff of a lead and he's off to Aruba.

226 wee fury  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:20:10pm

#218 Zombie
Thanks for posting those links.
As I said in my post #217 -- I no longer see a crescent. That is what angered me before and caused me to write the NPR, Murdoch and my congressmen.
I see no crescent now.

227 NY Nana  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:21:07pm

#124 Rayra

Speaking of the devil CNN: 'French CNN' given go ahead Somehow Fwance and CNN? They deserve eachother.

Great letter, BTW.

#134 nagasaki_hata

In a word? Oy!

I must repectfully totally disagree with Rebbe Wolpe.

I have always, and will continue to pray for Israel.

G'nite, all. We were on LI, taking care of our 5 1/2 year old granddaughter after she came home from kindergarten..the score?

Granddaughter=10

2 grandparents=0.

New version of the IF Rule: when you are too tired to post? Go to sleep, already!

ZZZzzz.

Happy December!

228 zombie  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:22:12pm
#224 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar

No, they added a crucial extra line of trees to fill in much of the formerly empty gap between the tips of the crescent. Now there is just a small opening, whereas before it was about 40% of the arc.

229 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:22:13pm

#220 Beagle

The 'artist' is a fool,Beagle, and should be replaced. Then again dogs and pigs are haaram. I like dogs, and pigs (and cows) are the modern day buffalo; we pretty much use every part of them someway or the other. But anyway, this travesty should never come to be, post-modern or euro-cynical or not.

230 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:24:12pm

#226 wee fury

I'm not responsible for what you see or don't see, but the cresent of trees is still there in the design - so objectively there is still a red cresent. The only thing that's changed is what words they're using to describe that cresent.

231 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:26:13pm

#228 zombie

I see, the gap is half the size it used to be.

Excuse me, it's still a cresent. They didn't change bugger all.

232 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:26:51pm

#226 wee fury

It doesn't matter what they now call it or how many new trees they plant to obscure the points of the cresent. It still orientates almost exactly to mecca.

233 wee fury  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:29:05pm

#230 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar
The original memorial design was a crescent. The new design is not a crescent.
I care about what I can see.
I no longer see a crescent in the redesign.

234 GenevaDan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:29:29pm

#59

try:

[Link: photos1.blogger.com...]

235 Fay  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:30:21pm

Who has the last word on design approval?

236 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:30:33pm

#233 wee fury

My definition of a cresent is a circle with a hole cut out of it, what's yours?

237 wee fury  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:33:09pm

#232 Portolan

orientates almost exactly to mecca.

Almost exactly my house points to Mecca. Almost exactly the Korean Memorial points to Korea. Almost exactly the Lincoln Monument faces Gettysburg.

238 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:34:42pm

#237 wee fury

Do you have a point there, dude?

If that was sacasm it failed.

239 freedomplow  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:36:15pm

Zombie... They changed it a little to appease their critics... Don't fall for that.

240 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:37:41pm

#237 wee fury

If you don't think "Crescent of Embrace" is a monument to the terrorists, it's hard to help you any further along. The "embrace" is one might expect from a giant squid.

241 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:38:35pm

Anyway what's their excuse for memorializing the four criminals responsible?

I'm sure there's some "they were victims too" line in there somewhere!

Fuck them!

242 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:39:28pm
243 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:39:51pm

#226 wee fury

I see no crescent now.


Did you read the linked post? It's worse than just the overall shape.

244 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:40:01pm

#237 wee fury

True, but did your house's original design start out as a big, red, obvious cresent to memorialize citizens who died fighting islamist aggresion? Is the Korean War Memorial in the shape of a big red star? Wee fury, all that they did is plant a few new trees. The whole design needs to be scapped and started over again.

245 wee fury  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:41:16pm

#238 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar
Yes. I have two points now. I'm really not trying to be nasty -- my #237 to Portolan was attempting to show that something can be read into anything.

My other point was that my anger at the first design for the memorial was the crescent shape. I have looked at looked at the redesign -- see Zombie's first two links at #218 -- and can see no crescent shape.

This is not a design I would have chosen had I been a person in charge. But, since I no longer see a Crescent shaped memorial I cannot hate it for the reason I did before.

246 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:42:46pm
247 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:43:21pm

I understand that there is a contingent of peter pan's who think that the answer to 9/11 is to give the Muslim world a big hug, especial the terrorits. If only the terrorist knew that we loved them, they would have played nice...

A memorial to the victims is not the place to hug those four terrorists.

If we're going to have big expensive memorial to Howard Dean's forign policy, then we should have a memorial to the Bush's foriegn policy too.

How about "the can of whoop-ass" memorial.

248 freedomplow  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:44:13pm

G

Do you see it?

249 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:47:02pm
250 zombie  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:47:42pm
#235 Fay
Who has the last word on design approval?

A lot of this has been covered in previous threads -- I guess due to the continuing outrage it should be reposted.

The FINAL decision-maker is Gale Norton, Secretery of the Interior. I have her email address and lots of other crucial contact info for key players in this comprhensive comment on an earlier Flight 93 thread.

251 patrickafir  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:48:44pm

Running the risk of being redundant, I have to ask again: Has anyone noticed anywhere on the Flight 93 Memorial site any mention of the 44 translucent blocks? I don't see any.

252 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:49:53pm

#249 Rayra

Excuse me, I'm not a fucking twit. I said almost because I wasn't dead sure.

253 zombie  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:50:01pm
#242 Rayra

Good going, Rayra -- but don't forget to send it to Gale Norton and all the other folks I have emails for in the comment I linked to in #250 above.

254 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:51:28pm

Check out this classic MSM spin creating a 'factual debate' where none exists. AP, natch.

SOMERSET, Pa. - A Somerset County preacher vowed to fight the design of the Flight 93 National Memorial, insisting that the crescent pathway used in the design is a symbol of Islam.


Typical Muslim spin, "We're the real victims."

Fouad El Bayly, leader of the Islamic Center of Johnstown, said the crescent isn't a holy symbol, but one identified with the lunar Muslim calendar.

"When it comes to a memorial, all mankind sympathizes," he said. "They recognize it was against everybody."


Sorry, bud, I know you're not that stupid, so you must be that evil.

"Islam Crescent" first result
As if it being on all their flags isn't a bit of a clue.

The crescent moon and star is an internationally-recognized symbol of the faith of Islam. The symbol is featured on the flags of several Muslim countries, and is even part of the official emblem for the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. The Christians have the cross, the Jews have the star of David, and the Muslims have the crescent moon, right?


There's a link to the flags if you look at the article.

AP has become the modern Goebbels for Islamic jihad.

255 Robert D  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:53:02pm

You know, after reading all this shit about the design of the memorial, what the hell is wrong with an American flag covering the whole area?

256 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:53:33pm
257 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:54:33pm

#256 Rayra

So do I.

258 wee fury  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:55:23pm

#249 Rayra

twit

I don't appreciate being called names just because I stated my opinion backed up with photo's of the redesign.
I made it perfectly clear that my concern with the first design was the crescent shape. Since I no longer see that crescent shape I do not view the redesign as a memorial to the terrorists who brought the plane down. I don't call anybody names because I don't agree with them.

259 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:56:45pm

Of course, like much of Islam, it's just a rehash of pagan religious practices. Love the "PBUH" in the article, *spit*.

The crescent moon and star symbol actually pre-dates Islam by several thousand years. Information on the origins of the symbol are difficult to ascertain, but most sources agree that these ancient celestial symbols were in use by the peoples of Central Asia and Siberia in their worship of sun, moon, and sky gods. There are also reports that the crescent moon and star were used to represent the Carthaginian goddess Tanit or the Greek goddess Diana.

The early Muslim community did not really have a symbol. During the time of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), Islamic armies and caravans flew simple solid-colored flags (generally black, green, or white) for identification purposes. In later generations, the Muslim leaders continued to use a simple black, white, or green flag with no markings, writing, or symbolism on it.

This is freakin' About.com not Ummah.org.

Oh, but as usual, Muslims 'disagree' without providing any evidence of same.

Based on this history, many Muslims reject using the crescent moon as a symbol of Islam. The faith of Islam has historically had no symbol, and many refuse to accept what is essentially an ancient pagan icon. It is certainly not in uniform use among Muslims.


Yeah, and terrorism has nothing to do with Islam even though "striking terror in the hearts of the unbelievers" is repeated over and over in the Koran.

260 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:56:53pm
261 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 8:59:31pm
262 Fay  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:00:38pm

Rayra and zombie, thanks for answering. I'm not American, do you suppose a letter from a non citizen, non resident, would carry any weight?

263 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:00:56pm

#258 wee fury

Is it because you don't want to see the cresent? Is it because the 'all clear' was at first sounded and now all is ok and you can go about your business? Scrap the whole damn thing. Erect a real memorial to the Americans who, as they boarded that plane, not expecting a life or death fight, found one and stopped the enemy anyway.

264 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:02:10pm

#261 Rayra

We're rolling, now.

265 zombie  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:02:36pm
#236 Joshua (not a hamster) Scholar
My definition of a cresent is a circle with a hole cut out of it, what's yours?

Actually, that may be one of the sources of the miscommunication. A "circle with a hole cut out of it" is NOT a crescent. A crescent is more properly the remainder of the intersection of two overlapping circles. In other words, a true crescent is thickest in the middle of the curve and then slowly diminuates to points at the tips of the curve. E.g. it looks like this.

A "circle with a hole cut out of it" is just that -- a partial circle. Not a crescent.

Dictionary.com definition of crescent:

The figure of the moon as it appears in its first or last quarter, with concave and convex edges terminating in points.

or

Something having concave and convex edges terminating in points.

266 freedomplow  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:03:00pm

via

Carolyn 11/30/2005 08:39AM PST

[Link: www.nasites.com...]

267 Yehudit  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:03:55pm
268 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:03:59pm

#258 wee fury

I made it perfectly clear that my concern with the first design was the crescent shape. Since I no longer see that crescent shape I do not view the redesign as a memorial to the terrorists who brought the plane down.


Don't let any facts get in the way of a good rationalization. Does the word "camouflage" ring any bells?

269 Tweety  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:06:57pm

Rayra #242,

Just one suggestion: remove terms such as 'cretins'. Even though they deserve to be called far worse, insulting them does nothing to strengthen the presentation of your case. The reverse in fact.

270 savage_nation[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:07:22pm
271 Iron Fist[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:07:58pm
272 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:08:32pm

#260 Rayra

Good catch. That's actually the worst propaganda technique in the article (among many). *tipping invisible hat* I pride myself on picking out propaganda techniques.

273 wee fury  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:10:24pm

#261 Rayra
We're done.
#263 Portolan
So many of my friends could have been on those flights, including me.
So, no I don't take the design of the memorial lightly.

274 Robert D  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:10:44pm

I repeat, what's wrong with an American flag? Oh well, that's just too, well... just... wrong?

275 Lazarus  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:13:08pm

#242 Rayra

I applaud your initiative. That letter is outstanding. It's easy to nitpick the phrasing of someone's letter when you're on the sidelines, but you got off your butt and did the right thing and did it well. Outstanding. Thank you.

276 Fay  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:15:34pm

#271 IF, thanks.

277 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:15:36pm

Great letter, Rayra. Righteous anger is the best kind. This is the United States of America, right? Nobody switched it to the Islamic Republic of America when I wasn't looking?

278 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:15:38pm

#273 wee fury

It could have been me. It could have been anybody or everybody I know. It could have been anyone posting here tonight. What's the problem? Scrap it. It's that simple. This design is not appropriate. It panders to the fascists.

279 Lazarus  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:16:23pm

#262 Fay

I'm not American, do you suppose a letter from a non citizen, non resident, would carry any weight?

I don't think anything should stop you from writing. It doesn't matter what your nationality is, as long as you're fighting for the right values. This American heartily welcomes your contribution!

280 freedomplow  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:19:11pm

It was designed to look like a red crescent for a reason.

It still looks like a crescent for a reason.


This is where your common sense should kick in if you have any.

281 Fay  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:21:18pm

#279 Lazarus

I don't think anything should stop you from writing. It doesn't matter what your nationality is, as long as you're fighting for the right values. This American heartily welcomes your contribution!

Okay, great, I'll write. Thanks.

282 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:21:28pm
283 Freedom Fan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:21:32pm
There are still 44 translucent blocks...

I'm guessing that the extra 4 blocks will "have a way" of disappearing somehow.

284 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:25:21pm
285 Lazarus  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:25:43pm

#281 Fay

You bet. And good for you!

286 Tweety  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:26:19pm

Israel's Red Cross equivalent, the superb Magen David Adom, has been applying for decades to join the Red Cross, but has been blocked, apparently because the Geneva conventions only recognise the Red Cross and Red Crescent and because Arab nations wont tolerate an organization with the emblem of a Red Star.

So now Israel seems to have agreed to use the neutral symbol of a 'red crystal' in Magen David Adom's operations abroad.

I don't know if other LGFers are onto this story and I don't know enough about the background to it, but my gut reaction is that it's a shameful 'compromise'.

Of course, it's no compromise at all, but it's bowing to the blind hatred of Israel's enemies.

287 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:27:39pm

#280 freedomplow

Exactly. At some point, common sense has to kick in. Heroes died in that field. Average people who had the courage to stand up and face and thwart evil. We can't allow this to become a symbol of islamist fascistism. That's what these average folks died trying to stop.

288 zombie  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:29:31pm

To clarify my position on the new design of the memorial, in case it's gotten lost in the squabbles:

The original design, admittedly, had many flaws. I'm not disputing that. But among the flaws, by far the most egregious and gut-wrenchingly obvious was the the Islamic crescent shape and color of the trees/walkway. The new design attentuates (though it does not completely eliminate) that design element. Sure, it's still vaguely crescent-shaped, but it's no longer so immediately apparent, and takes a little eye-squinting and head-tilting and self-convincing to see the "crescentness" of it as opposed to the "incomplete circleness" of it. And, for me at least, it does not immediately cry out "Islam." So, to one extent, I am somewhat glad that this worst aspect is lessened.

However, all the other aspects (minaret tower, counting the hijackers among the dead, orientation, ambience of mourning instead of righteous defiance, etc,) are bad, and to many follks, unacceptable. And thus the memorial should still be fought against until a better re-design comes along. I'm just sayin' that the crescent aspect really does seem to be far less then it used to be, and it's just enough to take it out of the "Islamic crescent" realm.

Of course, it shouldn't even be close to being a crescent. As I suggested when the controversy first broke out a couple months ago, it'd take almost no effort to alter the shape to be a cycloid, a parabola, etc.

289 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:30:25pm
290 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:31:05pm
291 savage_nation[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:31:24pm
292 driftwood  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:31:42pm

I'm not seeing the crescent anymore either. I did before, and thought the design was beautiful but horribly wrong for the site. This is an improvement. Not sure what Rawls is talking about with "the same two crescent tips" intact or the 44 blocks and would like to know, assuming fact-checking someone's ass is still allowed.

293 Beagle  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:33:42pm

zombie,

Sure, it's still vaguely crescent-shaped


I don't get the point. If they hide the design under a few minor cosmetic tweaks that makes it different? To me, that's the artist saying "Screw you America. You're stuck with my homage to the terrorists." Probably with "Allahu Akbar" thrown in at the end for good measure.

294 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:34:05pm
295 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:36:01pm

#289-290 Rayra

Great. Excellent.

296 Tweety  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:36:39pm

#284 Rayra,

...but that is the watered down version.

I like that. But I don't know if you should think of it as being watered down. Trim any insults off it, and it will be more effective.

297 patrickafir  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:37:27pm

#292 driftwood

Yeah, I was kind of hoping someone could point me to any verification that the 44 blocks part was still part of the plan. I couldn't find anything about that on the flight path info. on the memorial site.

298 Buckaroo  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:37:50pm

# 292 d


I just searched the pdf of the memorial newsletter and couldn't find a single "44." I definately need to see that aspect referenced somehow ...

BTW, on 9/11/02, a bell was rung at the Pentagon memorial one time for each member of flight 77, **including the 5 terrorists** -- hopefully such a mistake has not been repeated and will not be here ..

299 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:39:10pm
300 Lazarus  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:39:11pm

#291 savage_nation

Not much, man. Just relaxing with a little LGF before I call it a night. How are you? Back home yet?

301 zombie  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:39:25pm

#289 Rayra:

I'm honored that you're sending a link to my site to the White House! I'd better go spruce up my code and dust in the corners in case George clicks on the link and pays me a visit.

302 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:40:00pm

#292 driftwood
#297patrickafir

Follow the link and judge for yourselves...
[Link: errortheory.blogspot.com...]

303 savage_nation[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:43:13pm
304 Lazarus  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:43:45pm

#291 savage_nation

Did you catch Mike tonight? He cited a current Cox & Forkum cartoon mocking leftists naivete towards Islamists. Nice to hear.

305 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:44:29pm
306 patrickafir  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:44:53pm

302 Portolan

Yeah, I did—no mention of the 44 translucent blocks. We should be thorough, certain, and exact in our criticism.

307 savage_nation[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:46:04pm
308 Buckaroo  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:46:47pm

# 302 P

"In all, there are forty four translucent blocks emplaced along the flight path to the crash site, where forty Americans and four murderers died on September 11th."

OK, so error theory clearly states it, but where is he getting that from?

309 Son Of The Godfather  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:48:51pm

I am a law abiding citizen (for the most part).

IF, for some unholy reason, this hideous monstrosity gets built with that hellish design, anyone out there looking forward to a "field trip" for some modifications can count me in.

Rayra, your letter is awesome.

SOTG

310 wee fury  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:49:33pm
311 wee fury  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:51:29pm
312 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:52:16pm

#306 patrickafir

"There is also an an upper section of wall, continuing up the flight path that Flight 93 followed as it came into the crash site. Notice that this section of wall also contains a strip of translucent blocks, a shorter strip, just long enough to memorialize a small handful of people, like maybe the four terrorists who also died in the crash."

So, no, they're not individual blocks, but still, why are they there? The 40 innocent victims have been individually memorialized, haven't they?

313 savage_nation[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:53:07pm
314 Lazarus  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:53:30pm

#307 savage_nation

Weather was FANTASTIC!

Nice.

315 driftwood  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:54:26pm

Found something:

(Rawls)The lower portion of the wall, on the left, contains forty translucent blocks, backlit at night, and inscribed with the names of the forty murdered Americans. There is also an an upper section of wall, continuing up the flight path that Flight 93 followed as it came into the crash site. Notice that this section of wall also contains a strip of translucent blocks, a shorter strip, just long enough to memorialize a small handful of people, like maybe the four terrorists who also died in the crash.

I don't see that either. But ok, we're being hypervigilant now, and it's all because of the first design.

316 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:54:30pm
317 Buckaroo  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:57:17pm

# 316 Ray

Condi used to be at Stanford, right? As soon as she sees zombie's location, she'll understand the need to "screen" it for the CinC ...
:-)
:-)

318 Son Of The Godfather  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:59:00pm

#313

I'm thinking this will have so many people angry (I was going to say "up in arms", but that's just my wishful thinking) that I'm betting they'll go with security cameras all over...

Best scenario; go back in time and stop it from being built in it's current form. We are back in time to that point NOW.

SOTG

319 Lazarus  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 9:59:20pm

#310 wee fury

I love the hypocrisy. The very means that they use (a mic and PA) to facilitate their most sacred of religious practices are not only inventions of the West, but whose scientific research necessary to invent the damn things are impossible under Islam.

320 Lazarus  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:00:16pm

#313 savage_nation

The Crescent of Embrace needs more Patton and less patent leather.

321 savage_nation[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:01:54pm
322 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:01:59pm

Look, it's very simple. Scrap this design. Scrap all of the doubt and double meanings that this design conveys. Make the Flight 93 Memorial unequivical in it's meaning. Forget all of this red crescent, wind chime, wetlands of meditation bullshit and erect a memorial that actually memorializes the courage and heroism of these Americans.

323 StarsandStripes  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:02:35pm

By Phone
Superintendent - Flight 93 National Memorial
(814) 443-4557

I'm outraged! The new design clearly depicts a red crescent complete with a minaret-aka. Tower of Voices (Yeah, voices of the American dead screaming about this abomination being built upon their gravesite.)

I just called the Superintendent of the Flight 93 National Memorial and left a message decrying this abomination. Please call him tonight. Tell your friends and family to call him immediately. Call Secretary of the Interior Gale Norton.

If you post at other websites, tell them about this abomination and ask them to call the Superintendent of the Flight 93 National Memorial, Gale Norton, their Senators, their Congressional Representatives, the President of the United States. This memorial to the 9/11 Islamic terrorists cannot be allowed to be constructed!

324 Buckaroo  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:02:39pm

# 321 s n

Heh -- the indians are actually claiming that one nowadays anyway ...
:-)

325 savage_nation[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:04:07pm
326 JustMyView  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:04:36pm
A Crescent of Red Maples – which remain red all year, producing a Red Crescent

Red maples are red only in the fall. There are many images indicating this on the web.

The "board of cretins" contains a number of members of Flight 93 families. I'm sure they'll be delighted to hear themselves referred to in this way.

327 Son Of The Godfather  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:04:50pm

#322 Portolan:

Amen, brother.

SOTG

328 savage_nation[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:07:29pm
329 Son Of The Godfather  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:07:44pm

#326 Just My View:

So, it's only supposed to be an abomination in the Fall? Oh, that's ok then.

Idiot.

330 Buckaroo  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:08:22pm

# 328 s n

That also gets an "Amen Brother!"
:-)

331 What's the matter with Democrats?  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:08:50pm

Portolan

I'm going to pretend to be the LLL/idiots in charge of this, and respond to your suggestion:

Look, it's very simple. Scrap this design. Scrap all of the doubt and double meanings that this design conveys. Make the Flight 93 Memorial unequivical in it's meaning. Forget all of this red crescent, wind chime, wetlands of meditation bullshit and erect a memorial that actually memorializes the courage and heroism of these Americans.

HUH? Say it one more time, but slower so I can keep up.

332 zombie  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:10:21pm
#305 Rayra I'm skimming the other LGF topics on this issue for salient points and links for the letter, just found a post of zombie's referncing Paul Murdoch's crapthink - Linky

Wow, I forgot about that comment I made. That took a hell of a lot of searching, if I remember, and has never been posted anywhere else. Thanks for resurrecting it. I really think it merits a repost:

#29 zombie 9/8/2005 10:02PM PDT

Paul Murdoch, the winning architect, is a total moonbat -- AS REVEALED IN THIS POST HE MADE to the Robert Greenwald blog:

The class action suits voted by Senator Obama was wrong. Either he stands for the consumer and working class or he stands for the corporations.

Saying he is young and needs time in the Senate is a poor excuse to say the least.

You go to the Senate to work on problems that face American's. You set your self a goal. Senator Obama is working and setting a goal. The only problem is the goal is to help corportations.

What's next, will he vote to take away the overtime pay that Bush tried last time or how about settling the asbestos claims that the Republican's want so badly.

Once again the working class has been defeated. This time from one of our own.

Posted by: Paul Murdoch at February 25, 2005 08:50 PM

Gotta be the same Paul Murdoch -- concerned with the same issues.

Can you believe this? They chose a Marxist for the Flight 93 Memorial?

Beyond un-freakin'-believable.

333 savage_nation[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:10:26pm
334 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:11:12pm
335 Son Of The Godfather  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:12:57pm

Good work again, Zombie!
Sheeesh, this can't be good for my blood pressure.

SOTG

336 savage_nation[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:13:16pm
337 What's the matter with Democrats?  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:14:36pm

Son of the Godfather

Do you type SOTG at the end of every post, or is it automatic?

338 Buckaroo  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:15:47pm

# 334 Ray

That's a good closing -- it tempers the "louder" parts above and leaves the reader with a clear sense of what must be done ...

339 Son Of The Godfather  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:16:08pm

#334 Rayra

How do we get Rayra on the ticket in '08? ;)

340 Lazarus  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:16:46pm

#328 savage_nation

If they sign on to this piece of crap, then they damn well deserve it.

Amen. Just because you're a victim, it doesn't mean you have a blank check on signing off on any project that happens to honor the very movement behind your becoming a victim. Get a fucking clue.

341 Son Of The Godfather  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:17:14pm

>>>Do you type SOTG at the end of every post, or is it automatic?

Habit from other places.

342 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:19:02pm

#331 Whats the matter with Democrats?

Lol! Ok, Those folks on flight 93 could've been you, me, or anybody here. Now, say you die stopping a rapist from victimizing a woman, would you or your family want on your headstone what amounts to not only an excuse for rapists but a tribute to them? It's late and I'm tired but that to me is a good analogy for this abberation.

343 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:19:29pm
344 What's the matter with Democrats?  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:19:46pm

SOTG

Thanks. Only curious.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Goodnight all. Happy December.

345 Son Of The Godfather  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:20:51pm

#340 Lazurus

My guess is no one has pointed out the obscenities to them...

Now if they are aware of the symbolism involved and still approve, that's a different matter.

I think Murdoch and co. just cackle over their morning double-mocha-lattes about how sly they think they are.

Damn Murdoch to hell. Seriously.

346 Buckaroo  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:21:25pm

# 343 Ray

IIRC, it is not VFI -- just too close for comfort!
:-0

347 transferthem  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:22:49pm

this is sick! This is a sickness that will kill western civilisation and democracy and condemn humanity to a new dark age.

The victims of 9/11 were killed by islam.

The victims of 9/11 were killed by islam.

The victims of 9/11 were killed by islam.

The victims of 9/11 were killed by islam.

The genocide murderers don't count as victims.

The genocide murderers don't count as victims.

The genocide murderers don't count as victims.

The genocide murderers don't count as victims.

The genocide murderers don't count as victims.

To place any islamofascist symbol on a memorial to islammofascist genocide is like putting a swastika on a Holocaust memorial. Either the world will seek to destroy evil, or evil will triumph, as it has here.

348 What's the matter with Democrats?  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:23:37pm

342 Portolan

It's late and I'm tired but that to me is a good analogy for this abberation.

It's also a rhetorical question, which you and I both realize. Anti-idiotarians, however, would actually pause and contemplate the question before giving an answer. Kinda frightens me.

349 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:24:33pm
350 Son Of The Godfather  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:24:45pm

What are the chances we can get Murdoch, Ted Rall, Markos Zuniga, and Michael Moore into the same Pinto with a leaky gas tank?...

Oooops, ok, omit Moore and recalculate...

SOTG

351 What's the matter with Democrats?  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:24:50pm

PIMF! a very large PIMF:

anti-idiotarians = idiotarias

352 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:25:59pm

#332 zombie

Paul Murdoch; man of the people. Lets see him work 7 days a week in a plastics factory for 3 months straight. No doubt that motherfucker has a very nice house, a fat bank account, and a trophy wife to come home to. Not to mention the summer resorts, the off-shore accounts and the mistresses. Bastard.

353 Son Of The Godfather  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:26:45pm

transferthem:

>>>evil will triumph, as it has here.

Not yet, my friend. ;)

354 Lazarus  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:26:47pm

#345 Son Of The Godfather

My guess is no one has pointed out the obscenities to them...

Agreed. They just haven't done their homework. But considering that it's the one memorial honoring the death of their loved ones, you sure as hell would think they would.

355 Kyriakon  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:27:19pm

I just exhaustively searched Lexis-Nexis, and nothing in the past six months has been published in U.S. newspapers mentioning 44 blocks along the flightpath (that I have been able to find at least). Let's try to get verification. Can someone contact the error theory blog and ask for sources?

356 Son Of The Godfather  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:29:08pm

#354 Lazurus

I concur.

357 Lazarus  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:31:48pm

#350 Son Of The Godfather

You could have them collide with Moore, driving a GM SUV.

358 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:31:49pm
359 savage_nation[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:34:50pm
360 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:36:29pm

#355 Kyriakon

Oh, come on, man. The newspapers are going to avoid this like the plague. Just like they avoid the reconstruction of the Iraqi power grid and the Iraqi civil works.

That's it for me. Fight the Big Red (still) Crescent.

361 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:37:55pm
362 Portolan  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:38:03pm

Just one more thing; did you hear about the 'first' design in the papers or on the tv news? I didn't.

363 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:38:24pm
364 Lazarus  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:43:10pm

#359 savage_nation

Agreed. Pathetic.

/And the band played on...

365 JustMyView  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:43:46pm

Some facts for you.

1. I am not ViewFromIreland. I've never posted anything at DiscardedLies . . . nor read it, for that matter.

2. As you refer to me as a snarky bitch, I assume you think that I am a woman, but I've never said whether I'm a man or a woman.

3. Four of members of the Advisory Commission that chose the design were members of Flight 93 families. Some web sites indicate that the commission had fourteen members; others indicate that it had fifteen.

4. There is a statement from family members written after the initial flap over this issue indicating that they support the design.

Do keep us posted about the reaction to your protest.

366 Kyriakon  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:44:08pm

I just meant that nothing has been published in the press, of all the descriptions of the memorials, regarding 44 blocks. Are we certain that the plans actually call for 44 translucent blocks as Alec has claimed on Error Theory?

Buckaroo #298

I just searched the pdf of the memorial newsletter and couldn't find a single "44." I definately need to see that aspect referenced somehow ...

Alec, in a response on http://politicalities.typepad.com/politicalities/2 005/09/it_points_towar.html comments:

You won't believe what I discovered in the Crescent's PDF's. There is a separate memorial within the larger memorial that includes translucent blocks for the terrorists. The memorial to the flight crew and passengers contains forty inscribed translucent blocks for the the forty murdered Americans, but there are four more. Forty-four dead people. Forty-four translucent blocks.

I am not disputing the factual accuracy, but merely want to know if anyone else has verified independently that the memorial documents do indeed make mention of forty-four blocks.

367 zombie  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:46:13pm
#352 Portolan
Paul Murdoch... No doubt that motherfucker has a very nice house,

Believe it or not, after just ten minutes of Internet searching, I find myself looking at a photo of Paul Murdoch's house. From space.

Don't ask me how I did it, but I did. Lotsa clever tricks available out there on the Web, believe me. I won't post links to any of the steps that lead me to finding out his address etc. because, despite my disagreeing with his design philosophy, we need to keep from posting any personal data. Keep the battle a battle of ideas.

Where was I? Oh, the whole point of my comment: his house is actually quite modest-sized. Nothing special from what I can see. He certainly keeps his roof in good shape. Average LA neighborhood -- nothing particularly fancy.

368 Birkenstock Cowboy  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:46:53pm

350 Son Of The Godfather 12/1/2005 12:24AM PST

What are the chances we can get Murdoch, Ted Rall, Markos Zuniga, and Michael Moore into the same Pinto with a leaky gas tank?...

Get mike his own Pinto with a set of Firestone 500's

369 Tweety  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:50:05pm

#288 Zombie,

Granted that the ends of a crescent taper to a point, this 'memorial' should be completely scrapped and the designers taken off the project simply because there's no way to disguise the symbolism that was so obviously part of the original intent. Through your efforts and the efforts of other bloggers, thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of people are now aware of this monstrosity. And for the designers to fiddle with it here and there at this stage does absolutely nothing to make it any less of a monstrosity.

Even if they were to rotate it so that it doesn't align to Mecca and strip it of the other symbols of Islam, it will still retain its original association in the minds of many.

Of course, if they'd simply designed a circle rather than a crescent in the first place, and hadn't peppered it with Islamic symbolism, there would have been no problem.


303 savage_nation
Rayra,

More effective? I doubt. There are times that one needs righteous anger and I see it in that letter.

I agree 100% I should have been more explicit. There's nothing wrong with expressing outrage by using words like 'obscenity' to refer to the memorial. After all, that's what it is. But the personal insult in the form of 'cretins' mars an otherwise fine letter. The outrage is far more effectively directed at the results of people's actions in a letter like this than at the people themselves.

370 Lazarus  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:51:04pm

#367 zombie

Good thinking. I think that kinda stuff should be kept under wraps, or at least in the hands of people who can control themselves.

371 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:59:30pm
372 Son Of The Godfather  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 10:59:51pm

#365 JustMyView

>>>2. As you refer to me as a snarky bitch, I assume you think that I am a woman, but I've never said whether I'm a man or a woman.

Don't care if you're a man, a woman, or a little of both... you're still LGF's bitch.

373 EIDE_Interface  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 11:02:48pm

Fuck the left. Take back Flight 93 sacred ground!

374 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 11:02:55pm
375 JustMyView  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 11:12:47pm
Thanks for your factoids, anyway, for whatever they are worth - are you referring to teh First Round selection committee, or the second, because iirc they were composed of different individuals / overlapping groups of people.

I think there was just one commission. I didn't see any evidence that there were two.

As is the case w/ other posters, I couldn't find anything re the forty-four glass blocks in a design description, and all other elements of the design are well described in the pdf of the newsletter mentioned by Buckaroo above.

All references to the meaning of the forty-four glass blocks as relating to the terrorists link back to Rawls. The fact that
those four blocks are different sizes and in different places in the design makes the idea that they represent the terrorists seem like something of a stretch. Apparently others have raised questions about this issue too. Scroll down to "Update" to see Rawls's response to these questions. I think he is working overtime to generate this interpretation.

376 JustMyView  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 11:16:48pm

#371 Rayra

Your contrecant bullshit is all you EVER chime in with.


Not true. Sometimes I also point out how offensive and vulgar you are.

If you really want to have a voice in this issue, drop the reference to cretins. As someone said above, the personal insult is just going to increase the likelihood that readers of your letter will dismiss you as an over-the-top crank.

377 Dayenu  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 11:31:54pm

For the love of G-d, why the hell are they so determined to use the fucking crescent?

Can't they give it up already?

378 EIDE_Interface  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 11:39:45pm

376 JustMyView:

FOAD

379 savage_nation[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 11:40:21pm
380 ovidius  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 11:42:50pm

beejeezusmotherofgod
do you guys ever sleep? i'm on the east coast, went to bed listening to techno trance and hoped the whole monument matter was settled, after my 2 cent-input about the Soviets, and i get up for a pee, and what do i find on the screen? rayra and beagle and american and ferris and all the gang perkier than ever.
i get it: it's not over. i didn't think so. no matter, i'm still up for a good fight, whatever shape it may take
rayras, portolans, savages, americans,
stay well

381 Lazarus  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 11:44:13pm

#379 savage_nation

Yep. That's why we must smash them without qualification. It's us or them, period. Night, gang.

382 savage_nation[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 11:47:17pm
383 savage_nation[deleted]  Wed, Nov 30, 2005 11:50:35pm
384 Son Of The Godfather  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 1:09:21am

OT: Hey Markos "screw them" Zunigas...

The hurricanes seem to be over for now.

Are you going to reinstate your top-secret plan to destroy the DLC?

Just wanted to know. Thanks for any updates.

SOTG

385 ovidius  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 1:22:04am

#383 savage_nation,

it's 6 a.m. here, i'm bleary-eyed, Gigi d'Agostino-and-cheap-wine soaked, melancholy but ready to roll when called upon,
yours and the Lizard Nation's,

ovidius

386 Tiburon  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 1:43:10am

OT - As If anyone needed a reminder - 'sermon' in Paliland on the coming fate of America and the Jews under the kind ministrations of the Islamofascists.
at MEMRI

Not what one will expect to see on CNN.

Mezuzah has disappeared off my front door, and this is Ottawa, Canada. Curiouser and curiouser.

387 ladycatnip  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 2:07:30am

It isn't such a stretch for a moonbat to have placed 4 extra blocks representing the terrorists; it's reminiscent of the Columbine shootings when some idiot placed crosses in a memorial that included the two shooters. Those two extra crosses didn't last very long.

We need to scream this long and loud to the politicians of PA. We cannot allow this. Period.

388 Sissy Willis  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 2:13:17am

Hysteria rules. It is incorrect to say, as Alec Rawls does, that the "same two crescent tips" are still intact. The "crescent tip" -- aka an arc of a circle -- on the left in the landscape architect's plan drawing has come almost full circle to meet the other tip.

389 tigger2005  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 2:14:47am

Can we kidnap Paul Murdoch and torture him like that kid does Kevin Spacey in Swimming With Sharks? I especially liked the papercuts to the face, followed by a splash of Tabasco sauce. That'd take his arrogance down a notch or two.

390 Son Of The Godfather  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 2:18:27am

388 Sissy Willis

Ignorance rules. Put down the bong and address the convergence of all of these "coincidences" for this Islamic holy site... I mean Flight 93 Memorial.

391 Son Of The Godfather  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 2:20:00am

#389 tigger2005

Nah... Spacey comes out ok at the end of that flick.

392 justamomof4  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 2:56:56am

#297 patrickafir

Yeah, I was kind of hoping someone could point me to any verification that the 44 blocks part was still part of the plan. I couldn't find anything about that on the flight path info. on the memorial site.

I'm late to this thread and don't have time to look it up right now . . .but "Error Theory's" Alec Rawles Sept. 2005 entries detail the 44 blocks and if I remember correctly - the four blocks dedicated to the terrorists were on a separated section of the wall. It wouldn't be halal to be next to the kaffirs now would it? (sick sarcasm)
If the halal section was eliminated in the redesign, it should be mentioned. The redesigned block wall would simply reflect the 40 blocks for the passengers and crew. IF the block wall still remains with the separate continuation then assume that 44 blocks remain. And that's a big IF. This issue needs to be specifically addressed because the earlier lgf post stated:

The new design for the memorial, to be built on the site of the Sept. 11, 2001, crash near Shanksville, features most of the details of the original, which was unveiled in September after a worldwide design competition.
393 Right_Writer  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 3:02:49am

I think Tancredo should be in charge of this memorial, then we'd get the real thing.

I like the idea mentioned earlier of a simple granite monument inscribed with the 40 names and "Let's Roll" and the date.

394 justamomof4  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 3:06:51am
395 jaynumber13  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 3:28:06am

That's easy. We can just remove 4 of the accursed blocks after installed. By force if need be. If replaced, repeat.

396 kevin1107  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 3:32:13am

There are actually 43 blocks here if you read through Error Theory

397 saywhat?  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 3:36:57am

396 kevin 1107 - read further down . . .3 blocks on one wall, one final glass block is on the Overlook extending through inner circle of crescent, dedicating the site. Total glass blocks = 44

Still not sure if this remains in the redesign though - I'm off.

398 Radian  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 4:00:09am

A 7 year RUP herbicide would take out the trees.

The blocks could just be painted blood red or removed.

Or put up signs directing people to the islamic shrine.

399 sloska  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 4:01:19am

This is what I faxed the National Park Service today:

December 1, 2005


Superintendent
National Park Service
109 West Main Street, Suite 104
Somerset, PA 15501-2035

RE: Flight 93 Memorial Design

It is with a deep sense of disgust and disbelief that I am writing to you today regarding the Flight 93 Memorial design. Did you not understand the first time that the complaints about the original plans were directed at the obvious heralding of those that perpetrated the horrendous acts on September 11, 2001? The changes that have been made are a transparent attempt to simply mollify the offended, but not refocus the obvious tribute to the terrorists. This architect/design firm needs to be FIRED and a totally new design that honors those who fought against enemy aggression be implemented by people who truly “get it.”

Ignorance is failing to learn from our mistakes. The original design was a blatant slap in the face of the families of those brave souls who died on Flight 93, and this “revised design” is no better. This will not stand.

Sally Loska
Parrott, GA

400 scoreboard44  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 4:05:11am

This is disturbing. After reading this, I can't believe this is still going on.

SOMETHING OR SOMEONE NEEDS TO BE BLOWD UP. AND I KNOW EXACTLY WHAT ARTISTIC ISLAMOFACIST DESIGNER THAT IS!

I need coffee. God am I tired.

The Parks service is totally ignorant.

401 Son Of The Godfather  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 4:14:42am

#398 Radian:

Then we just have a crescent of dead trees.

Lets herbicide a nice addition... like that Hobbs comic character pissing on the crescent (of course the urine stream will be oriented towards Mecca), and a nice "Let's Roll" in the field that can be seen from Mars.

SOTG

402 Son Of The Godfather  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 4:15:59am

#399 sloska:

Excellent, Sally!

403 Son Of The Godfather  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 4:26:20am

Serious question...

Is any reference to the inspiring "Let's Roll" quote not to be used as it might offend?

Just who would be offended at a call to rise up against hijacking dickheads?...

Oh, it's a moonbat P.C. thing.

SOTG

404 Austin Conservative  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 4:32:26am

It's time to get this designer fired from the project. Nothing less will do.

WE MUST WORK TO GET THE DESIGNER KICKED OFF THE PROJECT!

405 Dirk Diggler  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 4:57:00am

I personally would like to see pictures of the Flight 93 passengers at the site. Many of the pictures I have seen online would do nicely. Blown up with a brief biographical sketch. Construct the whole thing as a corridor so that it resembles an aircraft cabin.

I guess my memorial would have three sections. One historical, the events as they transpired that day. The second section would be the corridor I just described, and the third a description on the monument.

As I stated earlier, if someone digs deep enough I'm certain they would find a Saudi money trail. Perhaps Mr. Murdoch is the receipient of good ol' baksheesh.

His insistence on a crescent design and a "Tower of Voices" (gag) that just happens to resemble an Islamic sundial is very odd indeed.

406 Lightning_Man  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:06:39am

Sent an e-mail to my congressman. I might suggest you do the same.

407 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:07:09am
408 average_guy  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:08:25am

Send a letter or e-mail to The Secretary of the Interior. The website is here.

409 abolitionist  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:08:43am

#242 Rayra

Subj: Flight 93 Memorial Abomination

Dear ELECTED Representative,
This is ONLY a letter. It could have been FLIGHT 93 on your desk.
...

/just another idea

410 Stringart  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:09:45am

#262 Fay

I'm not American, do you suppose a letter from a non citizen, non resident, would carry any weight?

From yesterday's other thread on the memorial:

The new design for the memorial, to be built on the site of the Sept. 11, 2001, crash near Shanksville, features most of the details of the original, which was unveiled in September after a worldwide design competition.

If the design was open to everyone, any criticisms and concerns should be as well.

I should put this on the other thread, but since I'm here, I never understood why a memorial to murdered Americans on American soil should be designed by any one other than an American.

411 average_guy  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:10:00am

#409 abolitionist

Good point

412 GreenBear  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:10:08am

Well, for what its worth, here's my note to the NPS:

"I have been reading about the proposed "changes" in the "Crescent of Embrace" design foisted upon this hallowed site in this year. Such superficial changes to a deeply offensive design are unacceptable. A completely NEW and different design is warranted, one more fitting to honor the 40 brave American souls (and only those 40) who thwarted a cowardly attempt to strike at the heart of our nation on 9/11.

Why not, instead of more of this avant garde hogwash, select a thoroughly traditional concept: say 40 bronze eagles (each inscribe with the name of a passenger or crew member) taking flight and a central plaque with the fateful words, "Let's roll!"

Keep the trees. I know you Parks people like trees. Just don't put them on a crescent shape. How about a chevron shape that points toward the place on impact? And lose the RED maples. Go for oaks or sycamores, something substantial that denotes the strength and resolve of the American spirit that put that plane in a Pennsylvania field instead of Pennsylvania Avenue."

Let's keep the pressure on and push for a new competition for a completely new design.

413 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:13:15am
414 wanumba  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:13:29am

To all - too many good posts to list specifically -

ANYTHING the Liberals say must fall under the Ronald Reagan Procedure:
Trust, but Verify. (In this case,a corollary - Don't Trust, verify.)

The Left has found it very easy to make soothing public statements once caught in something vile to staunch the bloodletting. Everyone backs off, satisfied, triumphant, and the Lefties carry on with exactly what they wanted to do in the first place. They create their reality with the media. The media does not perceive that watch-dog duties to expose the abuses of the Left is its job.

Examples: Has the DNC, or Hillary's brother ever actually returned the tainted funds they got? They said they did, but no one ever found out whether they did or not. This memorial is the same thing - they tweaked it under pressure to appease the critics. A woman who lives near the site was telling someone in our town (a couple of hundred miles away - during a conversation at the gas station to give you an idea how one has to scratch together news about the site) that the construction is going on as if nothing ever happened. She commented that it made her sick to see it.
Forget the architect - the people who are shoving this through are the problem - syncophants inside the Park Service, the Lefties on the committee. Murdoch only echoes what they want.

The whole thing should be scrapped. Tweaking isn't the answer. There is a moving memorial right there, now.

IF any surplus "transluscent blocks" somehow remain, they could stay, but with some tweaking - like swords thrust through them.

The committee lied and obscured their intentions. They lied some more to obscure it and lied again to placate critics then continued as they wanted. FIRE them. If the head of the Park Service aided and abetted them, FIRE him and everyone else associated with this travesty. No one is ever held accountable for their actions, which why these things keep happening.

415 Dirk Diggler  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:14:22am
Dear ELECTED Representative,
This is ONLY a letter. It could have been FLIGHT 93 on your desk.

Sweet.

416 Son Of The Godfather  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:20:25am

Zombie:

>>>Believe it or not, after just ten minutes of Internet searching, I find myself looking at a photo of Paul Murdoch's house. From space.

#1) What the hell are you doing in space?
#2) Feel free to e-mail me with how you narrowed it to our specific Paul Murdoch's place!

SOTG

417 tigger2005  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:22:38am

# 391 son

Yeah, but I doubt Murdoch has the balls Kevin Spacey's character had in that movie.

418 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:36:47am
419 Who Watches the Watchmen?  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:38:24am

#218 zombie

I understand the point you're making, but my opinon of Murdoch and his design remain the same:

DISQUALIFIED

420 HBob  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:41:43am

I called the Sec. of the Interior's office and got the nuber for Joann Hanley who is supposed to be in charge of the memorial which with 44 translucent blocks is memorializing the terrorists.

HR 3917 authorized a memorial to "the passengers and crew". Anything beyond that is not authorized or funded.

Call your congressmen and senators.
Joan Hanley's office number is 814-443-4557.

Gale Norton, Secretary of the Interior, 202-208-3100.

It doesn't take long to make a couple of phone calls.

421 Sean  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:44:45am

Why write when you can call?

Our esteemed pulic servant, Joanne Hanley, has her office phone at 814.443.4557.

She's in charge of the Skanksville Memorial.

422 hepcat  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:44:53am

Like I said, the architects should be redesigned, a few swift blows ought to do.

423 Sean  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:46:21am

Well HBob's a detective too! Good work fellow lizard minion!

424 big L  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:47:14am

413-tfk--my relative worked for a major corporation with a lot of franchises or outlets. There were sites owned or operated by some of the middle-easterners/islams. These guys would not comply to open hours and accounting procedures,etc, etc. My relative was the district supervisor and warned them time and again that the supervisors over her wanted to shut them down.
So the response she got one day was "where does your boss live, we will kill him, and you will be boss and we can still be open just the same."
My relative beat it out of there.

425 lawhawk  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:53:43am

#410 stringart:
I wouldn't dismiss a design because it was designed by someone who wasn't American. It's the quality of the design that counts, and there are significant problems with this design that have been glossed over by the NPS and Murdoch and associates. Throwing a few extra trees into the mix doesn't solve the problem of why the design honors the memories of the terrorists who tried to crash this plane into the Capitol or White House on 9/11. If there were 40 victims on board that fight (and a couple of that number were not Americans btw), it should be their memories that are hallowed - not the terrorists.

Thus, to include their ilk in the 44 translucent blocks is asinine and casts doubt on the intellectual rigor used to design the memorial in the first place. The Battle For Ground Zero, Part 74, has more (updated from yesterday).

426 MoonbatBane  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:58:24am

Any further proof needed that these scum consider the terrorist hijackers who committed 9-11 to be heros?

Can we question their patriotism yet? ('Effing TRAITORS /SPIT)

427 easy  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:01:41am

#410 Stringart 12/1/2005 07:09AM PST

"features most of the details of the original, which was unveiled in September after a worldwide design competition."

If this is "the winner" who awarded the victory? They are the ones with the splannin to do.

428 rrgg  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:06:02am

What I can't understand is the motivation. Who is interested in this stupid design? I seriously cannot imagine most Democratic leaders want it either. I suspect it's just public ignorance of the whole thing.

Where's Barbara Walters when you need her?

:-)

429 HBob  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:07:30am

#423 Sean

"Let's roll."

Sen. Santorum PA 1-202-224-6324

Sen. Specter PA 1-202-224-4254

Sen. Frist 1-202-224-3841

Rep. Hastert 1-202-225-2976

Sec. of the Interior, Gale Norton 1-202-208-3100

HR 3917 authorized the memorial to the "passengers and crew", not ANYONE ELSE!

430 easy  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:09:27am

#428 rrgg

Where's Barbara Walters when you need her?

Maby John Stossel would be interested.

431 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:09:33am

#425 lawhawk

Thus, to include their ilk in the 44 translucent blocks is asinine and casts doubt on the intellectual rigor used to design the memorial in the first place.

I agree with your point, but no one has shown that there actually are 44 glass blocks. You and the other blogosphere commentators who have remarked on this topic cite Rawls at Error Theory, but if you read Rawls's analysis carefully, you will see that he is speculating on this point.

In his original observation, he said:

The lower portion of the wall, on the left, contains forty translucent blocks, backlit at night, and inscribed with the names of the forty murdered Americans. There is also an an upper section of wall, continuing up the flight path that Flight 93 followed as it came into the crash site. Notice that this section of wall also contains a strip of translucent blocks, a shorter strip, just long enough to memorialize a small handful of people, like maybe the four terrorists who also died in the crash.

The key phrase here is like maybe. He generates this interpretation and then runs w/ it, and everyone else follows. There is NOTHING in any of the online design descriptions that refers to 44 glass blocks. If the claims that those blocks exist for that purpose can't be substantiated, any criticisms of the design that make that claim will be dismissed.

432 Stringart  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:18:27am

#425 lawhawk

I share everyone's disgust with the design. It may be that the islamic imagery we're seeing is purely coincidental and/or our tinfoil hats are a little tight. But, since so many see it, this design should be scrapped.

I'm sure there are many fine architects that are not American, but I still think a memorial for these murdered (mostly) Americans should have been designed by an American. The 9/11 scum were targeting America and Americans, not Japanese or Canadians or Germans or any other nationalities. And as horrified and outraged as people from other countries were and are by 9/11, there is no way any of us can feel the way Americans do. It didn't happen to our countries.

433 HBob  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:20:15am

Just got through to the call screener at the Laura Ingraham Show. His reaction? "Are you kidding?!" Call your favorite radio talk show hosts. It sounded like he was going to look into it. All I had tell him regarding finding the information was "it's all over Little Green Footballs"!

Everyone get out there and stink up the joint on this one.

434 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:24:28am

#399 sloska

The original design was a blatant slap in the face of the families of those brave souls who died on Flight 93, and this “revised design” is no better.

There is a statement at the Flight 93 National Memorial web site, written by families of the Flight 93 passengers after the original flap over this issue, indicating that they support Murdoch and the design. So it doesn't exactly seem like they felt slapped in the face.

I'm not arguing against anyone's right to criticize here, but it doesn't seem like a good idea to be sending off letters and making phone calls on the basis of claims that can't be substantiated. That'd be counter to the LGF commitment to fact-checking.

435 Who Watches the Watchmen?  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:26:03am

#429 HBob

Did you know that HR 3917 Flight 93 National Memorial Act was sponsored by Rep. Murtha?

436 Sean  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:29:33am

It quacks. It has the name Donald, Daisy, or Daffy. It has feathers. It is a waterfowl. It has babies that follow the mother in a nice straight line.

I don't think there is a "Burden of Proof" problem here.

437 scrappy  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:33:58am

Paul Murdoch Architects

Office Address
5150 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 504
Los Angeles, California 90036

Phone
323.931.2271 Office
323.931.9203 Fax
Information and Resumes:
INFO@PAULMURDOCHARCHITECTS.COM

438 Sean  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:34:10am

JustMyView,

I went to your link and I call "BULLSHIT!" on that statement.

It's signed with a nice nebulous "The Families of Flight 93."

That isn't good enough.

439 Who Watches the Watchmen?  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:35:15am

Follow-up to my #435.

The Flight 93 National Memorial Act is now Public Law 107-226.

Section 1(a)(4):
The crash site commemorates Flight 93 and is a profound symbol of American patriotism and spontaneous leadership of citizen-heroes...

Section 6:
For the purposes of this Act, the terrorists on United Airlines Flight 93 on September 11, 2001, shall not be considered passengers or crew of that flight.

440 wanumba  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:35:33am

#434 JustMyView

If you are going to have a "view" about something, be informed. Otherwise, it's just empty opinion filler.

Since the motives of this particular poster are suspect,(based on previous posting history) this is only clarification for the newer posters and readers who aren't aware of the earlier discussions and links and design analysis.

This was researched very thoroughly in earlier threads when the design choice was made public and it was noted that the majority of the families of the victims were not consulted. The statements were cherry-picked to bolster the committee's battle mode position that "everyone liked it, what's your problem?"

441 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:38:56am

Sean

That isn't good enough.

I agree that it would be more compelling if there were a full list of names, but it is posted on the web site for the memorial. I'm not enough of a conspiracy theorist to believe that the advisory commission made up the statement and posted it w/o consulting family members. Could be that family members didn't want their names listed to avoid having people calling them up to natter on about how the memories of their loved ones are being desecrated by the planting of trees in their honor.

442 godfrey  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:39:30am

The overall design of the memorial is weak, but the number 44 appears nowhere in the design documents as far as I can tell. No references to the terrorists are evident.

There are however repeated references to "the forty" passengers and crew whose memory is to be honored by names inscribed in marble.

A statement from Murdoch should suffice to clear this issue.

The courage and sacrifice of those who fought that day should come through loud and clear. As of now, it doesn't. Gutless.

443 HBob  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:40:41am

#435

Well ain't that sick? This whole thing needs to be scrapped and restarted.

Do you think that The Statue for Rosa Parks will include a statue of the bus driver and the white guy who wanted her seat sitting there together smiling like they're old chums? Where's Timothy McViegh's statue in Oklahoma City? This whole thing is sick.

444 godfrey  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:42:48am

No, scratch that "weak." The design is gutless and offensive. This business of 44 blocks however can be cleared up, and should be, by a statement and commitment from Murdoch.

445 RTLM  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:42:58am

Wratchet up the pressure on these appeasement-minded pinkos.

446 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:42:59am

#441 wanumba

This was researched very thoroughly in earlier threads when the design choice was made public and it was noted that the majority of the families of the victims were not consulted.

I followed this discussion pretty closely, and I don't remember anyone presenting evidence to document the claim you've made. It's true that only four family members were part of the 14 (or 15, sources differ) advisory commission that chose the design, but that doesn't mean other families weren't consulted.

I look forward to learning about your source.

447 Sean  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:46:24am

It's a DUCK, JustMyView.

It can't be denied.

Let's shoot it!

448 Sissy Willis  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:48:02am
449 yarfo  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:55:48am

In my opinion this design (the old one or the re-done one) does not memorialized the bravery and resolve of the victims of Flight 93 one bit. First and foremost the title, "Crescent/Bowl/whatever of Embrace".
After reading about all the intrisically hidden details which could be construed to have an islamic meaning (probably the intended purpose of the artist), I can only begin to wonder, What is it exactly they want us to "embrace"?

I can't for one second fathom the thought that "embrace" is what was going through these brave victims' minds when they decided to fight their aggressors and prevent them from fulfilling their intended plan.

Not only do they need to design something more apt, but a name change should also be in order.

450 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 6:58:12am

Sean

It's a DUCK, JustMyView.
It can't be denied.


Yes, it can. Look, I have no stake in this design. But I do think it is a little, um, let's say peculiar to think that a whole group of people---representatives of the Shanksville community, family members, and design professionals---got together and said, "What can we do that will really offend a lot of people?"

Whatever the position of the people who made the design decisions on the American political spectrum, I'd bet my retirement fund that they are not in league with Islamic terrorists.

As many people have said, it's the lay of the land that prompted the design. If the designer hadn't called it a crescent, no one would have paid attention to it.

Move on. Find something real to worry about.

451 satan sidekick  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:00:34am
The Flight 93 National Memorial Design Competition has been funded through the generous support of the Heinz Endowments and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.
452 godfrey  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:04:47am
If the designer hadn't called it a crescent, no one would have paid attention to it.

Nonsense. The design is vapid because it is abstract.

Why is there any ambiguity about the memorial at all? What's to be memorialized is obvious to everyone:

1. innocent deaths
2. courage and sacrifice in a fight

This is not rocket science, and it isn't "Art."

The names of the innocent are inscribed. Great. But there's nothing whatever about the design that memorializes and applauds courage and sacrifice in a fight. There should be, and there sure as hell shouldn't be anything that could be construed as "Islamic."

Do you agree?

453 Baldy  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:10:29am

Besides the possibility of questionable elements still existing, I'm offended by the New-Age faddishness of it. Wind chimes & tress? How does that symbolize courage & the warrior spirit? The larger issue is of how the country doesn't seem willing to honor their fighting back. This design, as in designs of other recent memorials, is about some kind of social therapy. It is not appropriate here. There is nothing noble or uplifting about stupid wind chimes. Maybe if there were automatic patchouli dispensers, it would be complete. /sarc

454 Marjin  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:11:41am

#450

I think everyone's biggest problem with it how there are blocks for the hijackers. This memorial is to remember the sacrifice of Americans, not terrorists.

455 Ayatollah Ghilmeini  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:12:45am

open question on this topic- the plane was flying to Washington was headed SW when it went down.

Has anyone checked to see if the objected to Qibla might also align with DC?

while the 44 blocks and the crescent are wrong, accusing the memorial of facing Mecca (forgetting the about the other objections) may be overstating the case, the flight path may be pointing to the city it saved.

456 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:16:23am
The names of the innocent are inscribed. Great. But there's nothing whatever about the design that memorializes and applauds courage and sacrifice in a fight. There should be, and there sure as hell shouldn't be anything that could be construed as "Islamic."
Do you agree?

I agree that it would be good if there were something about the design that displayed courage or sacrifice. That's what the passengers did. They sacrificed themselves. The design speaks to our sorrow, but it doesn't, to me, speak to what they did.

But as to how things can be "construed," the citizens of the right wing side of the blogosphers are second to none in their ability to find ways to "interpret" things in ways that are consistent with their pre-existing beliefs.

The design may not have the heroic elements some people want to see, but that does not mean it honors Islam or memorializes terrorists.

457 ColoradoJim  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:19:23am

#20

Good idea on the spray paint. When the paint is dry, pour some pork renderings over the 4 blocks. Be sure to do the same to the "prayer station".

458 wanumba  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:21:44am

#446 JustMyView

Perhaps someone more proficient than me with the site can resurrect the entire discussion of about two months ago, including the business about how informed the families really were. The committee did not show its true colors to the families.
Apart from that, if it is a private memorial then the families would have full control, and no one would have anything to say about it. This is now a tax-payer funded endeavor and if the public thinks it's a travesty, they have every right to protest and have it changed.

For the benefit of various dear readers, Justmyview has the mind-fogging effect of the Green Witch of CS Lewis' Chronicles of Narnia in the "Silver Chair" - talking to convince what exists isn't really the case.

459 Sean  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:23:36am
Move on.

Well, JustMyView, you just said all I need to know!

460 godfrey  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:26:07am

Baldy

This all derives from the pretensions of the 'artiste'. Murdoch et al evidently regarded this as a design or aesthetic problem.

You moron! It's a memorial to PEOPLE.

Notice how the design is all about the flight path and crash site, as if that's what primarily interests Murdoch. It isn't really the PEOPLE that his design represents. It really isn't their BRAVERY AND SACRIFICE.

No, it's about a stupid flight path and burn zone, as if THAT's what people should remember as they come to this landscape for "healing."

Feh.

461 j-damn  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:27:33am
There is a statement at the Flight 93 National Memorial web site, written by families of the Flight 93 passengers after the original flap over this issue, indicating that they support Murdoch and the design.

So what? There were a whole bunch of "9/11 families" that want us to surrender to Bin Laden and berated Bush in front of Congress for a couple of bucks and handshake from John Kerry, too.

462 j-damn  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:28:37am
For the benefit of various dear readers, Justmyview has the mind-fogging effect

You mean "justmyview(fromireland)"?

463 wanumba  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:31:22am

#462 j-damn

Rayra has been asking that question, but never gets an answer.

464 Amy  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:34:02am

I think the case for saying there will be 44 translucent blocks, which will include 4 for the terrorists, is extremely weak, based on what I've seen said and quoted on this thread (and I did read it all). I honestly do not think that anyone involved with this project intends to honor the terrorists.

I also agree with zombie that the new design resolves the Islamic crescent issue that the old design presented. I looked at the PDF of the new design very carefully, and I did not see a crescent, Islamic or otherwise. I saw a circle which has one relatively small opening in it for access.

As for the trees, since the murders occurred in September, which is associated with autumn, I don't have a problem with the trees turning a dramatic (blood) red in the fall. I see it as symbolic of the shocking attacks on American soil that preceded what will be the long winter of struggle against Islamic terrorism that we are engaged in as a nation.

I haven't made up my mind yet about the allegations that the tower is really some sort of minaret in disguise and/or acts as a sundial to indicate Muslim prayer times, or that the orientation of the circle is towards Mecca, etc. These claims seem like a bit of a stretch to me, but I'm reserving judgment on them for the time being.

It seems that a lot of the objections I've read here are based on the belief that the memorial is too abstract and not representational enough. While that may be a valid objection based on one's personal aesthetic tastes, I don't think it's a basis to object to the design on political or moral grounds.

All that said, I wholeheartedly support the right of anyone and everyone here to make his or her views known to elected representatives and governmental authorities involved in this project.

465 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:37:30am

#459 Sean


Move on.
Well, JustMyView, you just said all I need to know!

And you just confirmed what I said above re the tendency of LGFers to construe things in ways that are consistent with their pre-existing views! "Move on" is a phrase that was widely used long before MoveOn.org came to be. In fact, it's used quite a lot here, as in "Nothing to see here. Move on."

So, if that's everything you need to know, so be it. It's not much to build an argument on though.

466 ColoradoJim  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:40:15am

#456 JustMyView

I don't agree with you at all.

We spend a lot of time in this country making sure nobody offends, even in the slightest, any ethnic, cultural, gender,... group. Even if the intent of what is said, done, or wished is not consistant with how 'things can be "construed,"'. Intent versus impressions.

Turn-about is fair play. Either one applies this great care and sensitivity to all groups, including conservatives, or to none at all. Failing to do that makes one the kind of hypocrit that the left is always screaming about.

Some of us think the site is goofy and could be construed as supporting or honoring the actions of the terrorists as well as the actions of the heros. Great care is taken to not honor the Nazis at Holocost memorials, to not honor the KKK at civil rights memorials, to not honor Timothy McVey at the Oklahoma City memorial. Great care is taken to avoid language and displays that could, in any way or context, portray these scum in a favorable light. Lets take the same care at this memorial to not honor the scum terrorists.

467 Sean  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:45:20am
And you just confirmed what I said above re the tendency of LGFers to construe things in ways that are consistent with their pre-existing views!


Are you speaking Chomskyish?

468 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:47:23am
Rayra has been asking that question, but never gets an answer.

If you had read the previous part of this thread, you'd know that I answered this question. I am not ViewFromIreland. I have no idea who that is. I gather, from one of the posters above, that VFI was a poster at DiscardedLies, but I have never read nor visited that blog.

469 godfrey  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:50:26am
While that may be a valid objection based on one's personal aesthetic tastes, I don't think it's a basis to object to the design on political or moral grounds.

Wrong.

This is a public monument and cannot therefore escape politics and morality. Forty specific innocent people were murdered here, some courageously fighting back.

Abstraction obscures the central fact of what happened here: individual citizens sacrificing themselves to save others.

It is morally wrong to obscure that fact and lessen its power to inspire the future.

470 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:52:07am
Are you speaking Chomskyish?

I don't think so. When you said that I had "told you everything you need to know," in response to my "Move on" comment, I understood you to be implying that I am, in some way, affiliated w/ MoveOn.org.

I am not, and I took your took your suggestion that I am as evidence of the tendency to overinterpret things in a way that is consistent with pre-existing beliefs.

If you didn't mean to imply that I have something to do w/ MoveOn.org (which I don't), I withdraw my statement.

471 Baldy  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:54:38am

460 godfrey - Good points. It's as if he's designing wallpaper, not a monument.

472 quark2  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:56:55am

The memorial should be harsh, as in stone to remind us all of the decisions the passengers were faced with in such a short time before dying.
The horror and fear they faced was longer existing than the actual act of dying.
There lies their honour and their bravery in making the decision of how they would die. They didn't go down as mewling sheep, but as the trapped bear. Their spirits have not died, just their bodies.
Unlike the dead souls who frequently troll Charles threads, they will live on in memory.

473 Baldy  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 7:58:24am

Don't bother with JustMyView. She is someone who thought nothing wrong of MoveOn.org soliciting money for the NAACP & ACORN under the pretext of helping Katrina victims. Waste of time talking to her.

474 Sean  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 8:00:27am
Well, JustMyView, you just said all I need to know!

That really went over your head, didn't it?

475 Sean  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 8:06:26am

I know, Baldy, I know... I'm just killing some time.

No matter if it's deliberate or not, the design sucks on many levels.

I am against it precisely because it can be interpreted as Islamic propaganda.

If this design works out with some Moslem sybolism (like Freemason symbology hidden in architecture), that needs to be addressed.

476 quark2  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 8:16:42am

@468

I gather, from one of the posters above, that VFI was a poster at DiscardedLies, but I have never read nor visited that blog.

Those of you who are familiar with viewfromireland...did you catch this reference?

477 Fatal  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 8:18:59am

# 199 Gunslingah

Just started reading this thread, so forgive me if already mentioned, but . .

If they know that we focus 100% of our security efforts on "Middle Eastern males", well, they'll make every possible effort to use operatives who don't fit our profile.

This isn't a very effective debating technique. You posit an absurdity (100% of our efforts) as the only alternative and then proceed to show why it won't work.

So, how about we focus 80% of our efforts, or some other reasonable percentage of effort on profiling a group that accounts for 90+% of the incidents?

Would that not also make the job much more difficult for our opponents? Wouldn't their pool of potentional splodeys be considerably reduced if they had to find non-muslim arab younger males in order to carry out their attacks?

With your expertise, you should be able to estimate the size of the respective pools (the profiled vs non-profiled) of potential terrorists, see how diminished the entire potential population would become and determine the appropriate percentage of resources to apply in order to accomplish that reduction.

Now tell us how any level or profiling would be totally useless?

478 nixonkid  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 8:25:09am

Check out [Link: www.dnzh.com...] and look in the Qibla finder scroll down menu to see how Jerusalem is listed. Very telling. The Qibla finder is the Mecca orientation finder.

479 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 8:31:45am

#466 ColoradoJim

Turn-about is fair play. Either one applies this great care and sensitivity to all groups, including conservatives, or to none at all. Failing to do that makes one the kind of hypocrit that the left is always screaming about.

I take your point. It takes a little time for me to address it though, so please bear with this long response.

I certainly think anyone has a right to present any criticism of this design (or pretty much anything else), especially as some part of its construction and maintenance will require public funds. (I haven't looked into the financing in detail, but a lot of the funding will be derived from private sources. Tom Ridge and Tommy Franks are leading the fundraising effort.)

Still, while anyone has a right to present any kind of criticism, the critics also have to make a compelling case that people should pay attention to what they have to say. The inclination to avoid giving offense is surely strengthened if a critic can convince others that the whole design or some aspect of it is genuinely offensive. We do not, after all, honor the claims of everyone who has any kind of complaint about any old thing.

For instance, we honor the complaints of Rosa Parks, because we can see the obvious injustice of overtly discriminating against people based on skin color. We are more dubious, though, about the claims of people who support affirmative action, because judgments about who should be allowed to enter a prestigious college or who should get promoted are more complex than judgments about who should sit where on a bus. It is not easy to say that they are or aren't based on illegitimate factors (such as race or sex), and so they are more controversial.

A number of posters, including Marjin above, have pointed to the idea that there will be glass blocks representing the individual terrorists as particularly offensive. I agree that that would be offensive if it were true, but, as Amy says above, the case for that argument (indeed, for the fact that even are 44 glass blocks, is extremely weak). I agree w/ her position and have said so above. A careful reading of the multiple postings by Rawls at Error Theory would indicate that skepticism about the claim that the terrorists are individually memorialized at this site in glass blocks is warranted. To the extent that one's criticisms lack credibility (i.e., are weak), people will be less likely to take them seriously.

In addition to the credibility of one's criticisms, one's stake in the situation also plays some role in determining how much attention we should pay to critics. Above, sloskos referred to the design as "a slap in the face" to families of Flight 93 passengers, which seems to suggest that she feels that their views should be given more weight than the views of any citizen picked at random. I agree w/ that perspective, although I don't think the views of family members should necessarily be determinative. We should listen to them with extra care, but we shouldn't necessarily base our decisions on what they say about the design. But even if we were to agree that the views of family members should be given special weight, we would have to reject sloskos's claim about the effect of those views in this case, because, in fact, the families have supported the design.

I'm not trying to dismiss anyone's views. If I believed that the critics of this design had produced credible arguments, I would support them.

I would agree, for instance, that the design does not address issues of heroism or sacrifice. But those are aesthetic and, perhaps, moral issues. Much of the discussion here has focused on the purported intentions of the designer and the advisory commission to honor Islam and memorialize the terrorists. I don't believe they had any such intentions, and I don't believe anyone here has demonstrated that they did.

480 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 8:32:46am
481 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 8:33:38am
482 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 8:34:20am
483 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 8:38:51am
484 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 8:41:22am
485 Amy  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 8:43:46am

godfrey #469

Abstraction obscures the central fact of what happened here: individual citizens sacrificing themselves to save others.

That is your opinion, not fact. The Vietnam Veterans' Memorial wall is as abstract as it can get, just a stark wall with names, but it is a powerful statement.

I just don't agree with you that an abstract memorial "obscures" anything just by virtue of its being abstract.

486 quark2  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 8:50:30am

@438 Rayra

This poster mis-answered your question by posting not being VFI who is assumed to have posted over at DiscardedLies.
Another vfi disengenious action.

487 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 8:52:35am

468 quark2

I gather, from one of the posters above, that VFI was a poster at DiscardedLies, but I have never read nor visited that blog.

Those of you who are familiar with viewfromireland...did you catch this reference?

Both VFI and DiscardedLies have been mentioned in questions to me re whether I am ViewFromIreland. I repeat: I am not. I would say so if I were.


#474 Sean

That really went over your head, didn't it?

I guess so. You must just be too smart for me. If you'd care to clarify, I'll respond . . . when I have time.

ColoradoJim:

You raised a good point, and I tried to respond. The short version is: Yes, we pay attention to the sensitivities of people in particular groups and with particular points of view. We pay more attention to them if their claims seem well justified and if they have a stake in the situation, i.e., if we have a reason to pay special attention to their sensitivities above those of others who might be advancing different points of view.

In this case, many, but not all, of the criticisms of the design that have been raised seem to me to lack merit. The views of people here should be respected, but no more so than that of any other citizen. There is no reason to think that LGFers or other conservatives have special insights about this design. There's also no more reason to think that people who dislike the design would be harmed by leaving it as it is than there is to think that people who like the design would be harmed by changing it. People have a right to be heard, but it is their responsibility to make their views compelling to others.

Now, I really have to go back to work.

488 quark2  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 9:23:10am

@487 VFI JustMyView

I repeat: I am not. I would say so if I were.


*LOL

What an oxmoron! You assuming I would ever
accept your Word about anything!
It's an accepted fact if it were proven you are VFI Charles would ban you again with no warning, so of course you're not going to admit it!

489 Fatal  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 9:24:58am

# 456 JustMyView

But as to how things can be "construed," the citizens of the right wing side of the blogosphers are second to none in their ability to find ways to "interpret" things in ways that are consistent with their pre-existing beliefs.

Second to none?

So, does this mean the "implosion" of the WTC, the pre-knowledge of the Jews, the planning of the event by Bushitler to get us into a war in order to steal oil / benefit Halliburton / secure his place in history / etc . are all actual legitimate facts and not the left "finding a way to interpret things that are consistent with their pre-existing beleifs"?

Me thinks that thou dost protest too much!

490 sloska  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 9:31:18am

#434 JustMy View

I have read the "statement" that is posted on the website; however, I have corresponded personally with several family members of the survivors, one being Deena Burnett, who stated that her father in law, Tom Burnett's father, served on the Memorial committee and was definitely NOT in favor of the design. Without specific names assigned to this letter, I do not assume that the statement reflects the views of all of the family members; certainly not those with whom I have corresponded.

491 HBob  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 10:27:03am

Okay. Just spoke to a "consultant" involved with the memorial. He's telling me he doesn't know how many "translucent blocks" are going to be at the site. That was after telling me that 40 blocks or 44 blocks is irrelevant. So I suggested that they make it 40 since "it doesn't matter".

So my question is where is the number of 44 "translucent blocks", "obelisks", "erected structures" whatever the hell you want to call them, coming from? He was trying to tell me that the number only comes from a blog and the only number he knew of for sure was 40 groves and 40 wind chimes.

492 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 10:30:40am
What an oxmoron! You assuming I would ever accept your Word about anything! It's an accepted fact if it were proven you are VFI Charles would ban you again with no warning, so of course you're not going to admit it!

Well, Charles has as much opportunity to see what I have posted as he has to see what any other person has posted. Whether I am VFI or not, he could have banned me if he wanted to, but he hasn't, even though I have written some things that are critical of him and of LGF.

There's no way I can prove to you that I am not VFI. Unless you know who VFI is, which seems unlikely, I could send you my name, address, phone number, shoe size, and baby pictures, and you still wouldn't know whether that info came from me, from VFI, or from one person who is both. Such is life on the Internet.

But, once again for the record, I'm not VFI. You'll just have to decide for yourself whether you want to believe that.

493 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 10:47:46am

#489 Fatal


Second to none?

So, does this mean the "implosion" of the WTC, the pre-knowledge of the Jews, the planning of the event by Bushitler to get us into a war in order to steal oil / benefit Halliburton / secure his place in history / etc . are all actual legitimate facts and not the left "finding a way to interpret things that are consistent with their pre-existing beleifs"?

You got me. Maybe not second to none. I know there are people who do people those things, and I don't have the sense that anyone here does---nor do I.

I also think, though, that people may believe some of those things w/o believing all of them. For instance, I'd be surprised to find many Americans, whether liberal or conservative, who believe that the WTC fell down by itself or that Jews were warned to stay away on 9/11. Beliefs about motivations for the war are, without a doubt, more varied.

I do think that both LGFers and people who spend a lot of time on the liberal blogs share a tendency to demonize the people they disagree with and to assume that they have a whole line-up of beliefs that go together. On LGF, for instance, opponents of the war are sometimes characterized as being in favor of Saddam's government. One doesn't necessarily follow from the other. On the liberal blogs, people who support GWB and his decision to invade Iraq are sometimes seen as warmongering madmen. And, on both kinds of sites, everybody hates the media. It is, in fact, hysterical to see how similar the kinds of things that are said about the media here are to the kinds of comments about the media that appear on dailykos.

My world is a little grayer. I'm willing to believe that one can oppose the war in Iraq and still love America. I'm willing to believe that one can support the war in Iraq and not be a crazed proponent of violence as a solution to all problems.

I recognize that this position may make some see me as one of the dreaded equivocators, but I'm willing to live w/ that too. It's nice to have a clear, crisp view of the world, with everybody and everything in neat categories. That sort of view is just not very accurate.

494 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 10:57:58am

#490 sloska

I have read the "statement" that is posted on the website; however, I have corresponded personally with several family members of the survivors, one being Deena Burnett, who stated that her father in law, Tom Burnett's father, served on the Memorial committee and was definitely NOT in favor of the design. Without specific names assigned to this letter, I do not assume that the statement reflects the views of all of the family members; certainly not those with whom I have corresponded.

Sally:

I'm sure you're right---that there are people among the group of family members who opposed the design, as well as people who supported it. There are probably even people w/in the same family who hold different views.

My comment was a reaction to your statement about the design being a slap in the face to the families of Flight 93 passengers. I'm sure some felt that way, but others clearly didn't. Without collecting more data, we can't really argue one or the other what "the families" think---even if we assume that when we say "the families," we only mean "most of the familes" rather than "all of the families."

We do know, I think, that there were some on both sides---which supports the view that others have presented here that, although we should listen very carefully to those who were most aggrieved by this terrible act, we can't necessarily base all decision on those views. Even if we wanted to, their diversity would make doing so impossible.

495 Mardukhai  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 11:26:22am

I've viewed the topography -- maybe the national park service maps are biased, but the area does look something like a punchbowl with a notch -- to line the area with anything, you wind up with a crescent that points in a particular direction.

STILL -- even by accident, creating an islamic monument is out of the question.

If they have to give up on lining the ridge with trees, if they have to make it smaller to eliminate the notch, then...

FINE.

Do it.

496 Cousin Dave  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 11:44:13am

I know I'm late but...

#6 mbruce:

Why do these people hate themselves sooo much?

They don't hate themselves. They hate us.

497 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 11:58:01am

#491 HBob

So my question is where is the number of 44 "translucent blocks", "obelisks", "erected structures" whatever the hell you want to call them, coming from? He was trying to tell me that the number only comes from a blog and the only number he knew of for sure was 40 groves and 40 wind chimes.

Several people raised this question last night and again this morning, and several pointed out that there was no info in any of the design documents re these 44 glass blocks.

Your colleague is right. This reference to using the glass blocks to memorialize the terrorists as individuals was generated in a speculative blog posting in mid-September. Later, the blogger--Rawls at Fatal Error--was apparently questioned about it, because he developed an elaborate, but not entirely credible, analysis of how some glass blocks might represent the terrorists. Other bloggers cited his report uncritically, and some LGFers used this not too reliable info in their calls and letters to people in Congress and the administration. See #375 above.

498 Cousin Dave  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 12:09:24pm

#479 JustMyView:


I take your point. It takes a little time for me to address it though, so please bear with this long response.

With all due respect, you did not address ColoradoJim's question at all. Here's why:

We do not, after all, honor the claims of everyone who has any kind of complaint about any old thing.

Of course we do. It happens every day. For example, Southwest Airlines had to spend thousands of dollars to defend itself against a totally baseless lawsuit by a passenger who was "offended" by a children's nursery rhyme. (They won the suit, which is good, but it's also rare. And even though they won, they had to spend their resources to defend themselves, while the "offended" plaintiff didn't spend a dime.)

We are more dubious, though, about the claims of people who support affirmative action, because judgments about who should be allowed to enter a prestigious college or who should get promoted are more complex than judgments about who should sit where on a bus. It is not easy to say that they are or aren't based on illegitimate factors (such as race or sex), and so they are more controversial.

Controversial or not, quotas and AA are the law of the land, and all of the protests in the world have not succeeded in changing that one iota. Further, as many defendents have found out, there is no defense against a quota lawsuit -- if you are accused, you are guilty. QED.

I'm not trying to dismiss anyone's views. If I believed that the critics of this design had produced credible arguments, I would support them.

But it isn't up to them to produce a credible argument. All they need to, according to multicultural philosophy, is state that they are offended. It is then up to the site designers to prove that their design is not offensive.

I don't believe they had any such intentions, and I don't believe anyone here has demonstrated that they did.

Again, according to the multiculti view, the designer's intentions do not matter. Only the perception of the viewers matter. And it's clear that an identifiable and significantly large group of Americans are offended. Are their concerns going to be addressed? If not, then how is the left going to explain this breakdown in cultural sensitivity? Or is that a privilege reserved only for certain groups? Again, I ask that you address ColoradoJim's quesion: are the sensibilities of conservatives going to be respected as the sensibilities of other groups are respected, or are the design's supporters just going to be hypocritical about it?

499 Rayra[deleted]  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 12:49:44pm
500 foreign devil  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 12:59:14pm

I was afraid of this. Damn! Well...we'll just have to keep punching. Email them right away that the rumor is it's still a 'red crescent' fascist-looking thing and it's UNACCEPTABLE!

501 quark2  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 1:03:26pm

@492 JMV

No, we'll wait and see how much new rope you purchase.

502 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 1:27:37pm

Hi:

I've split your long post into several and will try to address all the issues you raise. I've labeled your comments, and my previous comments are labeled JMV1. My new remarks are labeled JMV2.

(Rayra is likely to come along and say that my posts are too long, but I wouldn't be posting at all if I weren't answering your questions.)


Dave: With all due respect, you did not address ColoradoJim's question at all.
Here's why:

JMV1:We do not, after all, honor the claims of everyone who has any kind of complaint about any old thing.

Dave: Of course we do. It happens every day. For example, Southwest Airlines had to spend thousands of dollars to defend itself against a totally baseless lawsuit by a passenger who was "offended" by a children's nursery rhyme. (They won the suit, which is good, but it's also rare. And even though they won, they had to spend their resources to defend themselves, while the "offended" plaintiff didn't spend a dime.)

JMV2: Your answer suffers from a common problem in that it asserts that a decision of this sort is rare, but presents no evidence of how many such suits are filed, how many are dismissed before going to court, how many are settled out of court, how many plaintiffs win, and how many defendants win. Not to mention that there is no definition of what constitutes a “baseless lawsuit.”

That said, it is, in my view, obvious that, as a society, we do not attend to the complaints of every wounded person who claims to have suffered some sort of injury at the hands of society, in general, or at the hands of other individuals or organizations. Consider, for instance, an organization such as MADD, which has lobbied for stiffer penalties for drunk drivers. Although penalties are more severe than they used to be, there are still many drivers on the road who have given considerable evidence that they are not likely to be reliable drivers, but they are still there. So that’s just one example of a group w/ a justifiable grievance that has not had its complaints responded to adequately. Even if you or I think they have, I am pretty confident that many members of that organization would not agree.

503 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 1:32:03pm

JMV1: We are more dubious, though, about the claims of people who support affirmative action, because judgments about who should be allowed to enter a prestigious college or who should get promoted are more complex than judgments about who should sit where on a bus. It is not easy to say that they are or aren't based on illegitimate factors (such as race or sex), and so they are more controversial.

Dave: Controversial or not, quotas and AA are the law of the land, and all of the protests in the world have not succeeded in changing that one iota. Further, as many defendents have found out, there is no defense against a quota lawsuit -- if you are accused, you are guilty. QED.

JMV2: They are nowhere near the law of the land to the extent that many people would like them to be. Just ask the administrators of the University of California. Prompted by the activism of Ward Connerly and others their affirmative action programs were dropped or significantly cut back. The University of Michigan had to fight hard—all the way to the Supreme Court—to keep its relatively modest AA programs intact.

Here is a statement from the Department of Labor web site that supports that assertion. [Link: www.dol.gov...]

This statement refers to requirements of federal contractors in the construction industry. Such contractors are, according to this site, required to make a “good faith effort” to increase the utilization of women and minorities, but they are prohibited from specifying quotas.

"The numerical goals are established based on the availability of qualified applicants in the job market or qualified candidates in the employer’s work force. Executive Order numerical goals do not create set-asides for specific groups, nor are they designed to achieve proportional representation or equal results. Rather, the goal-setting process in affirmative action planning is used to target and measure the effectiveness of affirmative action efforts to eradicate and prevent discrimination. The Executive Order and its supporting regulations do not authorize OFCCP to penalize contractors for not meeting goals. The regulations at 41 CFR 60-2.12(e), 60-2.30 and 60-2.15, specifically prohibit quota and preferential hiring and promotions under the guise of affirmative action numerical goals. In other words, discrimination in the selection decision is prohibited."

I found this statement and others like it by googling "quota, affirmative action."

504 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 1:41:31pm

#499 Rayra

WTF have you DONE? Besides equivocate & fence and choose not to take any position at all?

On this issue, I don't think any action is called for. Some of the statements made above regarding the memorial--how many glass blocks there are, for instance, and what they mean--have been shown to be, at best, highly questionable.

I do not perceive the intent to desecrate the memories of the people who were killed in the attacks that led to the crash of Flight 93 in the design of the memorial that you and some other LGFers do, so I'm not sure what action would be called for from me.

On other issues that I care about, I've written to Congress, made phone calls, sent emails, and such, just as you have done re this issue.

Must go now. I have other things to do tonight, but I may be able to come back later to finish my response to Cousin Dave. . . again, since he asked.

505 JustMyView  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 1:51:01pm

Actually, since there's only one more part to Cousin Dave's message, I'll finish it now.

JMV1: I'm not trying to dismiss anyone's views. If I believed that the critics of this design had produced credible arguments, I would support them.

Dave: But it isn't up to them to produce a credible argument. All they need to, according to multicultural philosophy, is state that they are offended. It is then up to the site designers to prove that their design is not offensive.

JMV2: I never indicated that I subscribed to any such philosophy, if, indeed, any such philosphy exists. You cite no sources.

In my view, it is not up to the designers to prove that their design is not offensive. I think they have solicited input from relevant sources, that they had an open competition with a large number of submissions, and a body that was, probably, blessed by the National Park Service made a decision. Moreover, they responded to criticism. Some people in the preceding posts have indicated that they found this response adequate; others do not. That's life. Nobody gets everything they want.

JMV1: I don't believe they had any such intentions, and I don't believe anyone here has demonstrated that they did.

Dave: Again, according to the multiculti view, the designer's intentions do not matter. Only the perception of the viewers matter. And it's clear that an identifiable and significantly large group of Americans are offended. Are their concerns going to be addressed? If not, then how is the left going to explain this breakdown in cultural sensitivity? Or is that a privilege reserved only for certain groups? Again, I ask that you address ColoradoJim's quesion: are the sensibilities of conservatives going to be respected as the sensibilities of other groups are respected, or are the design's supporters just going to be hypocritical about it?

JMV2: My answer is that, if people have a credible argument, their argument should be heard. There is no other political group or social group that gets everything they want. The sensibilities of conservatives deserve respect, as do the sensitivities of any other group--no more, no less. That doesn't mean that whoever is the decisionmaker has to give people whatever they want.

506 fmfnavydoc  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 2:33:56pm

I posted this when this issue came up a few months ago...

I'm no designer or architech, but this is what I would think would be a fitting memorial to Flight 93...

A grove of evergreens in the distance - one for each passenger and crewmember(minus the slopeydopes)

A White marble wall - shillouttes of the passengers and crew (minus the slopeydopes), wiht their names, date of birth and hometowns and religious faith etched in black.

On both ends of the wall, the following statement:

On this spot, on September 11, 2001, Americans stood up, fought and died in the first major battle in the war against Islamic Terrorism.

"LET'S ROLL"

507 Cornish intifada  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 2:54:33pm

Whats the deal with the 4 terrorists!
What is the "The design still incorporates a separate upper terrorist-memorial wall",

A memorial for the terrorists?

this is ^&$#$% outrageous!

508 hous bin pharteen  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 3:42:21pm

We are going to erect a monument to Osama Bin Laden on this site.

And the chief reaction of the average american is to sit around with their thumb up their ass.

Now tell me he wasnt right when he said we are decadent and weak.

509 StarsandStripes  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 3:49:25pm

I just emailed the President of the United States, Vice President of the United States, Secretary of the Interior Gale Norton, Pennsylvania Senator Santorum, Congressman Tancredo and my Congresswoman in California to express my outrage at this Islamofascist Shrine of a Flight 93 "memorial".

I hope everyone takes action and emails their U.S. officials to combat this atrocity. Do it today!

510 wanumba  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 3:54:17pm

#508 hous bin pharteen

We are going to erect a monument to Osama Bin Laden on this site.

This is no time to go pessimistic. The MSM monopoly has shirked its duties as invisioned in the constitution and is not informing the public. Once people I've talked to hear about it, they are irate. This is the immediate problem - get the word out. Pioneering ventures like OSM are not in general circulation as yet, that is the majority of people are not getting their news from the internet or blogs - that is changing, but not this week. This requires rolling up the sleeves and putting some elbow grease into it. Newspapers. local and regional and national, radio, local regional national, TV, same. Senators, Representatives - that's their job, isn't it? Represent the PEOPLE. Time to remind them.

Empower the People --- like it? Good for the New Media, n'est pas?

511 hous bin pharteen  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 4:03:56pm

Pessimistic?

I will fight it tooth and nail

The fact that it was ever even proposed in the first place says something deeply disturbing about this country.

The fact that my fellow americans make excuses for it is also deeply disturbing.

The fact that the design competition that came up with this insult was funded by the wife of someone who could have been president is extremely disturbing.

512 Stop Hillary  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 4:07:33pm

Three words: "Pennsylvania Chainsaw Massacre".

513 hous bin pharteen  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 4:13:38pm

The state that has Valley Forge, Gettysburg, and the site of Washington crossing the Delaware should not have this scar on its land.

We of course now have a Democratic Philadelphia mobed up politician as Gov who is more concerned with doing Eagle post game shows than being a true leader.

514 Stop Hillary  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 4:31:55pm

hous bin,

A Pennsylvanian! Maybe you can help me. I've been considering PA as my retirement state down the road. As blue states go, it's as red as they come. BUT, Murtha, RINO Arlen Specter and Rendell are scaring me off. Need I be that concerned? Also, I have some other practical questions but don't want to waste LGF bandwith, so please email me if you will. Thanks.

515 hous bin pharteen  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 4:38:06pm

PA is a Red State.

We just happen to have two large blue cities.
Philly and Pittsburgh.

That screws up the vote.
The Monday after Thanksgiving is an unofficial
holiday. Its the opening day of deer season.
That should tell you something right there.

516 Stop Hillary  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 4:43:54pm

#515 hous bin -- "That should tell you something right there."

It does, and that's a lot of what I had in mind in saying it was red for a blue state. Right now, I'm in the free and independent socialist republic of New Jersey which has just elected the leftmost US Senator as its governor. It's only going to get worse here generally, and as far as the 2nd Amendment goes, it is going to get worse fast. I think you can understand my problem.

So my interest in PA is serious. Thanks.

517 hous bin pharteen  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 4:48:25pm

#516 Stop Hilary

I sent you that e-mail

518 EE  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 4:59:05pm

#199 gunslingah
Profiling can do two worthwhile things:
(1) make our own efforts more effective,
(2) make the terrorists' efforts more difficult to accomplish.

If the terrorists don't respond to our profiling, then our own efforts become more effective.

If the terrorists do respond to our profiling, then their efforts become much more difficult.

For example, if we don't do any checking at all of 100-year old females, and the terrorists try to take advantage of that, it will be very difficult for them to find 100-year old females who can be put into operation as suicide bombers.

It's not one or the other of these two matters that is important, it's the combination.

Check out Krauthammer's article,
Give Grandma a Pass
[Link: www.washingtonpost.com...]

He points out that if profiling is not possible because of political correctness issues, then perhaps negative profiling can be done, to obtain some advantages and to somewhat disadvantage the terrorist enemy.

For example, he writes, do some age pruning. And don't be as thorough on females (except for the obvious suspects who are sweating profusely and look very suspicious). And give a pass to some ethnic groups, such as Asians and Hispanics and some Scandinavians.

There will be an overall gain in effectiveness compared to screening everybody; or else if the terrorists respond to this, they will find it much more difficult to recruit suicide terrorists.

519 wanumba  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:49:43pm

#511 hous bin pharteen

The fact that it was ever even proposed in the first place says something deeply disturbing about this country.

Yes, but deep breath, it's by the usual suspects.

The fact that my fellow americans make excuses for it is also deeply disturbing.

Ditto - the usual suspects. Majority of the people hate it once they hear about it, so take comfort in those numbers. Get the word out so pissed people overwhelm snivellers.

The fact that the design competition that came up with this insult was funded by the wife of someone who could have been president is extremely disturbing.

Can't argue with that. How IS it these middle class meglomanics get their paws on so much money...? Death and inheritances, evidently.

520 Sam I Am  Thu, Dec 1, 2005 5:54:01pm

I can't believe how STUPID I was. I truly thought that the design was/would be changed.

Oh, well..."I fucked up and trusted them" to do the right thing.

I have learned my lesson and I will NEVER EVER give the MSM and any liberal the benefit of the doubt.

This "memorial" is another sickening display of how far gone and lost a large segment of Western/American society has become.

Damnable traitors they are and they should be treated like traitors.

Well, one solution is to let this abomination be built and then poison the trees. Turn them black -- as black as the damned souls of the vermin that committed these henious acts.

I must again paraphrase Cato the Elder --

Islam must be destroyed.

521 HBob  Fri, Dec 2, 2005 7:14:52am

CAN SOMEBODY DIRECT ME TO AN ARTIST'S RENDERING THAT SHOWS THE 44 "BLOCKS"?

I'm starting to feel duped since I haven't found anything that shows the 44 blocks. I've only read about them. Where is the picture?

522 Baldy  Sat, Dec 3, 2005 9:18:55pm

521 HBob - I wonder too. I don't trust the architect or the cmte, but not sure about latest charges.


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

  • Loading...

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

An integral part of the Rovian pipeline of disinformation.

Follow Lizardoid on Twitter

 Frank says:

If you want to get laid, go to college, but if you want an education, go to the library. -- Quoted in the Pittsburgh Press in the summer of 67.