1 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 2:33:22pm

Congressional & reality in the same sentence... only the Onion.

2 arethusa  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 2:34:24pm

The blatant product placement is right on.

3 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 2:34:27pm

heh... swiffers...

4 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 2:38:57pm

The Onion folks are excellent at finding congressie looking critters.

5 Cato the Elder  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 2:39:50pm

re: #4 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

The Onion folks are excellent at finding congressie looking critters.

They do damn good newscasters, too.

6 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 2:40:12pm

re: #5 Cato the Elder

Oh, heck yeah.

7 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 2:44:07pm

re: #6 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Oh, heck yeah.

it would be interesting to show an Onion clip and not call it satire... I bet the majority would think it was real.

8 jordash1212  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 2:47:21pm

Still the most accurate news analysis on the planet.

9 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 2:53:19pm

where is everybody...


/// look! it's Sarah Palin...

10 William of Orange  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 2:54:38pm

WOOHOOO!!!!

The Netherlands today took it's 100th gold medal in Olympic history!! And WHAT a medal! The first ever Dutch victory on a snow event. Nicolien Sauerbreij won the giant snowboard slalom!


Sorry for this off topic info but this news just came in and was very welcome over here in The Netherlands!


YEEEHAAA!!

11 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 2:56:14pm

re: #10 William of Orange

WOOHOOO!!!

The Netherlands today took it's 100th gold medal in Olympic history!! And WHAT a medal! The first ever Dutch victory on a snow event. Nicolien Sauerbreij won the giant snowboard slalom!

Sorry for this off topic info but this news just came in and was very welcome over here in The Netherlands!

YEEEHAAA!!

have a beer & some cheese for me!

12 William of Orange  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 2:57:14pm

And for more nonsense....


This is epically funny!!!

What we need is turtle fences!!

13 Mad Al-Jaffee  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 2:57:25pm

This is my favorite recent one:

[Link: www.theonion.com...]

My brother (who speaks Danish) told me they're really speaking Danish in the video.

14 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:01:27pm

re: #11 brookly red

have a beer & some cheese for me!

I was hoping for some smoked Gouda...

15 Guanxi88  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:02:01pm

re: #14 brookly red

I was hoping for some smoked Gouda...

Nah! That stuff is impossible to keep lit, and it gunks up your pipes.

16 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:02:50pm

re: #15 Guanxi88

Nah! That stuff is impossible to keep lit, and it gunks up your pipes.

bake it into bread.

17 Mad Al-Jaffee  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:02:59pm

re: #7 brookly red

it would be interesting to show an Onion clip and not call it satire... I bet the majority would think it was real.

People have taken some of their print stories seriously:

[Link: www.danwei.org...]

18 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:05:15pm

re: #17 Mad Al-Jaffee

People have taken some of their print stories seriously:

[Link: www.danwei.org...]

The 'gay agenda in schools' story some years ago was taken seriously both by horrified anti-gay activists and by horrified pro-gay activists. And FORWARDED to me by both groups.

19 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:06:02pm

Rangel... still a free man. What is wrong with this picture?

20 Cato the Elder  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:08:55pm

re: #19 brookly red

Rangel... still a free man. What is wrong with this picture?

Poor choice of words.

21 SixDegrees  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:10:38pm

re: #19 brookly red

Rangel... still a free man criminal. What is wrong with this picture?

Fixed for Cato.

22 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:11:35pm

re: #20 Cato the Elder

Poor choice of words.

perhaps that is the problem after all... allow me to re-phrase. Rangel, not in jail yet. What is wrong with this picture? Happy now?

23 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:20:38pm

re: #22 brookly red

perhaps that is the problem after all... allow me to re-phrase. Rangel, not in jail yet. What is wrong with this picture? Happy now?

Why should he be? It was all a satffers fault! I know this because Rangle told us so! If anything, he should be applauded for conducting an exhastive in house investigation amongst his own staff to find the fall guy culprit

24 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:26:13pm

Politician are clowns.

25 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:26:59pm

re: #23 sattv4u2

Why should he be? It was all a satffers fault! I know this because Rangle told us so! If anything, he should be applauded for conducting an exhastive in house investigation amongst his own staff to find the fall guy culprit

Oh the staffer... how stupid of me!

I am feeling like some pasta right about now... linguine perhaps... maybe some mushrooms, onions and olives... yeah I am feeling that.

26 SteveC  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:27:02pm

Congressional Reality Show

100 Senators, 435 Representatives, 1 President = 536 contestants

We can vote 1 contestant off the Hill every week....

This show's gonna run forever!

27 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:27:22pm

re: #24 Bagua

Politician are clowns.

why insult clowns!?!?!
//

28 Cato the Elder  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:27:57pm

re: #22 brookly red

perhaps that is the problem after all... allow me to re-phrase. Rangel, not in jail yet. What is wrong with this picture? Happy now?

I would settle for his being stripped of his chairmanship, for starters. On that, I believe, we can agree.

29 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:28:18pm

re: #24 Bagua

Politician are clowns.

Politician are clowns whores.

30 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:29:55pm

re: #28 Cato the Elder

I would settle for his being stripped of his chairmanship, for starters. On that, I believe, we can agree.

tax evasion is still a crime for you & me...

A felony IIRC...

31 SteveC  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:30:06pm

re: #24 Bagua

Politician are clowns.

Batman vs. Joker

32 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:30:19pm

re: #28 Cato the Elder

I would settle for his being stripped of his chairmanship, for starters. On that, I believe, we can agree.


Why... is this really as important as everyone is trying to make it out to be. I don't think so. The GOP just needs some sort of deflection from the health care reform debate.

33 A Man for all Seasons  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:30:44pm

re: #25 brookly red

Oh the staffer... how stupid of me!

I am feeling like some pasta right about now... linguine perhaps... maybe some mushrooms, onions and olives... yeah I am feeling that.

Awesome..Go for an awesome salad also.. Eggs, Cheese, Veggies, Fruit...
It's really good for you...
Best of luck finding work soon...
Regards

34 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:32:45pm

re: #33 HoosierHoops

Awesome..Go for an awesome salad also.. Eggs, Cheese, Veggies, Fruit...
It's really good for you...
Best of luck finding work soon...
Regards

Did you get the last email. To answer you here, I don't have any college education, none, went right from high school to work, two days later... been working ever since (well, not so much these last 5 years)...

35 A Man for all Seasons  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:32:47pm

re: #32 Walter L. Newton

Why... is this really as important as everyone is trying to make it out to be. I don't think so. The GOP just needs some sort of deflection from the health care reform debate.

I'll call you this weekend Walter..

36 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:33:05pm

re: #32 Walter L. Newton

Why... is this really as important as everyone is trying to make it out to be. I don't think so. The GOP just needs some sort of deflection from the health care reform debate.

/well maybe they could whip up a a righteous frenzy about unemployment... that should get 1 in 5 on board.

37 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:33:52pm

re: #35 HoosierHoops

I'll call you this weekend Walter..

I should be in all weekend, have no plans, Sat. night through Monday morning it may be snowing, so, probably won't be running around the county on the roads.

38 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:36:12pm

re: #27 sattv4u2

why insult clowns!?!?!
//

Good point, I retract that comment. Clowns deserve more respect.

39 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:37:55pm

re: #38 Bagua

Good point, I retract that comment. Clowns deserve more respect.

40 SteveC  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:39:37pm

Breast Implants Save Woman's Life

Com'on... don't you just have to read a news item that contains the line

"So don't go getting breast enhancements as a means to deflect a possible incoming bullet."
41 A Man for all Seasons  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:39:53pm

re: #34 Walter L. Newton

Did you get the last email. To answer you here, I don't have any college education, none, went right from high school to work, two days later... been working ever since (well, not so much these last 5 years)...

I'm so Sorry Walter..I really am..You write clean code..
You know who I work for...The min. is a BA in your field..Most of the Oracle programmers have a Masters degree..My smoking hot HR lady has a Doctorate degree from Stanford or some such shit...I am sorry..
Lucky for you.. I have a buddy that is a Techie in Denver..I will put out feelers for you.. Thus the call the call this weekend...He knows the field and has worked for dozens of IT companies there.. We'll talk

42 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:39:56pm

re: #38 Bagua

Good point, I retract that comment. Clowns deserve more respect.

clowns make people laugh... I don't see many smiling let alone laughing walking down my block.

43 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:41:55pm

re: #41 HoosierHoops

I'm so Sorry Walter..I really am..You write clean code..
You know who I work for...The min. is a BA in your field..Most of the Oracle programmers have a Masters degree..My smoking hot HR lady has a Doctorate degree from Stanford or some such shit...I am sorry..
Lucky for you.. I have a buddy that is a Techie in Denver..I will put out feelers for you.. Thus the call the call this weekend...He knows the field and has worked for dozens of IT companies there.. We'll talk

Good... works for me.

44 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:42:43pm

re: #34 Walter L. Newton

Did you get the last email. To answer you here, I don't have any college education, none, went right from high school to work, two days later... been working ever since (well, not so much these last 5 years)...

I thought we decided we were opening up a male escort service !?!?!

45 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:44:13pm

re: #44 sattv4u2

I thought we decided we were opening up a male escort service !?!?!

ACORN is no longer available for tax consulting.

46 Randall Gross  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:44:56pm

Bear Dogs of DC

47 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:45:35pm

re: #45 Decatur Deb

ACORN is no longer available for tax consulting.

Maybe Barney Franks ex live in lover can give us hints on how to run one!

48 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:47:20pm

re: #47 sattv4u2

Maybe Barney Franks ex live in lover can give us hints on how to run one!

I hear it's tricky--lots of foot tapping code to learn.

49 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:47:41pm

re: #47 sattv4u2

Maybe Barney Franks ex live in lover can give us hints on how to run one!

/nothing the IRS can't instruct you on... bend over & keep saying that you like it...

50 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:48:21pm

re: #42 brookly red

clowns make people laugh... I don't see many smiling let alone laughing walking down my block.

I retract and apologize, it is insulting to the clowns to compare them with politicians.

51 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:49:08pm

re: #41 HoosierHoops

I'm so Sorry Walter..I really am..You write clean code..
You know who I work for...The min. is a BA in your field..Most of the Oracle programmers have a Masters degree..My smoking hot HR lady has a Doctorate degree from Stanford or some such shit...I am sorry..
Lucky for you.. I have a buddy that is a Techie in Denver..I will put out feelers for you.. Thus the call the call this weekend...He knows the field and has worked for dozens of IT companies there.. We'll talk

And on another topic that you comment above brings up, I have never understood the "need" that some companies have for degrees. I don't mean that if you have one, it shouldn't be an advantage to helping you find employment, but it shouldn't be a brick wall to working at company "X."

I started working with computers way before they had any meaningful courses available for that "science." I was programming computers before most people even had daily access to them.

In 30 years, I've written code solutions to every business rule that exists, now a days it's only a matter of repeating something I have done many times over to "solve" a need in a software application. And when the occasional "new" problem arises, it's really just an old problem in a new container, ergo, basic problem already solved.

I ask you, the same question I have asked over and over, what kind of practical knowledge does a BA or Masters in computer science (or just any degree) give me that I probably don't already have after 30 years of doing this?

Something I have never understood.

52 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:49:31pm

re: #44 sattv4u2

I thought we decided we were opening up a male escort service !?!?!

I have a headache.

53 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:49:43pm

re: #50 Bagua

I retract and apologize, it is insulting to the clowns to compare them with politicians.

Accepted.
clowns work hard & provide a service...

54 SteveC  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:49:57pm

re: #50 Bagua

I retract and apologize, it is insulting to the clowns to compare them with politicians.

*SMACK*

THANK YOU SIR! MAY I HAVE ANOTHER?

55 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:51:14pm

re: #51 Walter L. Newton

With you 100%. There are hundreds of engineers and technicians in the company I work for. I know many of them. Some have degrees, some have multiple degrees, some have no degrees. Without prior knowledge, sitting and talking to them you can't tell one from another

56 Killgore Trout  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:51:39pm

Obama To Announce Way Forward On Health Care Next Week

The White House will announce next week -- "probably closer to Wednesday" -- the president's preferred path forward for getting health care legislation passed, spokesman Robert Gibbs said on Friday.

"The President will take into account what he heard yesterday, work through with the team some ideas and make an announcement next week about the way forward," Gibbs said.

Gibbs declined to get into specifics. But the widespread assumption on Capitol Hill is that Obama will address specific changes that he wants made to the Senate's version of the legislation (beyond the proposals he set forth in his own outline this week) and that he will encourage Congress to pass those changes using reconciliation, a procedure that precludes a filibuster.


Here's how it will probably play out....
Should Democrats Take Republican Reconciliation Threats Seriously?

Conversations with reconciliation experts suggest that the minority can in fact flood the zone with amendments--but it also shows that Democrats can circumvent them if they want to.

Let's say the Republicans offer 100 politically charged amendments to the reconciliation bill, none of which are germane. Democrats can move to waive all of them, and, as the Republican aide said, the minority can force a vote on the motion to waive.

But it's important to remember: Reconciliation is intended to be an expedited process. It allows for 20 hours of debate, after which all amendments must be disposed of in a so-called "vote-arama." So all of those amendments (or motions to waive the amendments) must be voted on in rapid succession.

My guess is that they'll include some of the Republican suggestions as a token gesture but I don't think they expect to get Republican votes. It'll be interesting to see how this plays with the public.

57 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:51:46pm

re: #52 Walter L. Newton

I have a headache.

I'm married to you !?!?!?

58 SteveC  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:51:54pm

Arrrgh! Quoted wrong person!

re: #49 brookly red

/nothing the IRS can't instruct you on... bend over & keep saying that you like it...

*SMACK*

THANK YOU SIR! MAY I HAVE ANOTHER?

Remember, only a licensed professional should post without preview!

59 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:52:24pm

re: #54 SteveC

*SMACK*

THANK YOU SIR! MAY I HAVE ANOTHER?

no. your policy does not cover...

60 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:52:29pm

re: #51 Walter L. Newton

And on another topic that you comment above brings up, I have never understood the "need" that some companies have for degrees. I don't mean that if you have one, it shouldn't be an advantage to helping you find employment, but it shouldn't be a brick wall to working at company "X."

I started working with computers way before they had any meaningful courses available for that "science." I was programming computers before most people even had daily access to them.

In 30 years, I've written code solutions to every business rule that exists, now a days it's only a matter of repeating something I have done many times over to "solve" a need in a software application. And when the occasional "new" problem arises, it's really just an old problem in a new container, ergo, basic problem already solved.

I ask you, the same question I have asked over and over, what kind of practical knowledge does a BA or Masters in computer science (or just any degree) give me that I probably don't already have after 30 years of doing this?

Something I have never understood.

Is there no process by which your output can be your reference, like a medieval guild's masterpiece?

61 Cato the Elder  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:54:21pm

I don't know why I suddenly thought of this song, but maybe it has something do to with Washington.

[Link: www.youtube.com...]

62 Killgore Trout  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:55:29pm

Looks like a fun rainy day project: Fresh Ricotta in Five Minutes or Less

You could also make some homemade pasta and make ravioli.

63 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:56:33pm

re: #56 Killgore Trout

Obama To Announce Way Forward On Health Care Next Week

My guess is that they'll include some of the Republican suggestions as a token gesture but I don't think they expect to get Republican votes. It'll be interesting to see how this plays with the public.

For a quess, what portion of the electorate could distinguish reconciliation from reconstituted orange juice? We are the nerds who sat up front in Civics.

64 prairiefire  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:57:30pm

re: #63 Decatur Deb

We Are The Nerds! Great LGF banner.

65 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:57:51pm

re: #30 brookly red

tax evasion is still a crime for you & me...

A felony IIRC...

Paying income tax in America is Voluntary

66 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:58:22pm

re: #62 Killgore Trout

Looks like a fun rainy day project: Fresh Ricotta in Five Minutes or Less

You could also make some homemade pasta and make ravioli.

Vinny, the contract is no... repeat no... call you later, sorry about your sister...

67 prairiefire  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:58:51pm

re: #61 Cato the Elder

She's my role model for going silver.

68 SteveC  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:59:02pm

re: #64 prairiefire

We Are The Nerds! Great LGF banner.

*Grab hands and start singing*

We are the nerds
We are the children
We don't like the crap
That you're givin'

69 A Man for all Seasons  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:59:07pm

re: #43 Walter L. Newton

Good... works for me.

My buddy has done IT there for along time...We'll get ya something..
I like your code..You are a good programmer...I gave up that crap years ago and went into System Admin work..
Have you considered working as a programmer for logistics work?
A lot of 3rd party WMS systems use Socket Calls into a Database that is pretty easy language and standard API's... There is lots of work in logistics software right now...Think HighJump Software and visit the web site to get an idea of what I am talking about...
You simply implement their software solution to run a workplace..Scanguns in Wal-mart..Shipping schedules...All phases of WMS...
Highjump loves me...I'm this close to having them send me a high priced hooker..*wink*
Remember in Mrs. Robinson the dude at the pool said the future is Plastics? Welcome to 2010.. It's now Logistics software...

70 Killgore Trout  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 3:59:39pm

re: #63 Decatur Deb

Yeah, I don't think the public is going to care very much. However, after the bill is implemented and if it starts to reduce costs it might be pretty popular. The Republicans might look like douchebags. If it flops (which I don't think it will) the Dems are going to look bad.

71 Cathypop  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:00:27pm

re: #51 Walter L. Newton
/// Cause a degree looks good in a frame////

72 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:01:46pm

re: #60 Decatur Deb

Is there no process by which your output can be your reference, like a medieval guild's masterpiece?

Output... you mean code samples. SUre, I have pages of code sample, I sent some to HH because he had a lead on some possible employment, as a seasoned programmer, he can certainly see that I know what I talk of.

But if his company requires BA's or Master's degrees as part of the employment qualifications, there is nothing I can do about that, nor probably he can do about it.

My domestic partner, she does what I do, difference is she is currently has a job she has had for about 12 years. She know what I can do, she has seen what I can do when I am working on a part time contract job, she says she hasn't seen much better.

Really, this is simply a fact, but a lot of what has happened to my career has to do with "ageism." I'm 57, and no matter how talented I am, in the larger scheme of numbers and money, I am a red mark on a ledger sheet.

My age makes me a burden on a benefits plan, they think my age (true or not) precludes me form working as many hours as they may need and all sort of other negatives related to my age.

I've been told by IT recruiters, you know, "off record" that my age will make it difficult to find full time work.

That's just the facts, and I have been dealing with the facts the for over 5 years now.

73 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:02:49pm

re: #70 Killgore Trout

Yeah, I don't think the public is going to care very much. However, after the bill is implemented and if it starts to reduce costs it might be pretty popular. The Republicans might look like douchebags. If it flops (which I don't think it will) the Dems are going to look bad.

with all due respect we will take great offense... great offense.

74 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:03:46pm

re: #70 Killgore Trout

starts to reduce costs

reduce costs for who? How?
How does adding millions of people into a system that don't have the wherewhithal to financially contribute in 'reduce costs"!?!

75 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:03:51pm

re: #69 HoosierHoops

My buddy has done IT there for along time...We'll get ya something..
I like your code..You are a good programmer...I gave up that crap years ago and went into System Admin work..
Have you considered working as a programmer for logistics work?
A lot of 3rd party WMS systems use Socket Calls into a Database that is pretty easy language and standard API's... There is lots of work in logistics software right now...Think HighJump Software and visit the web site to get an idea of what I am talking about...
You simply implement their software solution to run a workplace..Scanguns in Wal-mart..Shipping schedules...All phases of WMS...
Highjump loves me...I'm this close to having them send me a high priced hooker..*wink*
Remember in Mrs. Robinson the dude at the pool said the future is Plastics? Welcome to 2010.. It's now Logistics software...

Er... no, never saw the movie.

76 Killgore Trout  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:04:07pm

For those of you planing your spring garden you might want to consider adding mushrooms. Outdoor Mushroom Patches work well and I've used them in the past. This year I'm trying the "Three Amigos". I'll let you know how it goes.

77 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:04:45pm

re: #71 Cathypop

I lost the diploma argument with my code monkey son years ago. He's done well, but I still see him at a disadvantage if he ever needed to get past an intern that's screening cv's.

78 Killgore Trout  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:05:06pm

re: #74 sattv4u2

starts to reduce costs

reduce costs for who? How?
How does adding millions of people into a system that don't have the wherewhithal to financially contribute in 'reduce costs"!?!

Those answers are easy to find so I suspect your being willfully ignorant. You can learn how the bill works if you want to.

79 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:07:09pm

re: #78 Killgore Trout

Those answers are easy to find so I suspect your being willfully ignorant. You can learn how the bill works if you want to.

I do know 'how the bill works". I'm asking if you know how it's going to "reduce costs", in that you're the one that stated it. (and notice I did it,, not once, but TWICE without name calling or snark!")

80 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:07:14pm

re: #78 Killgore Trout

Those answers are easy to find so I suspect your being willfully ignorant. You can learn how the bill works if you want to.

NO, I call BS. you show it...

81 A Man for all Seasons  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:08:13pm

re: #71 Cathypop

/// Cause a degree looks good in a frame///

A world class company hires world class people...
I'm sorry if you don't have a degree...Life is unfair...
But like I said..My smoking hot HR girl ( and in person she is unreal) Has a doctorate degree.. And she just fricking rocks as a HR rep...
All my transcripts were went through with a fine tooth comb before I got an offer letter...
You don't need to have a college education to excel in Software.. Ask Bill Gates

82 SteveC  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:09:11pm

re: #74 sattv4u2

starts to reduce costs

reduce costs for who? How?
How does adding millions of people into a system that don't have the wherewhithal to financially contribute in 'reduce costs"!?!

They are going to reduce costs *Ahem!* by slicing Medicare payments. You ought to see the reductions they are planning for Cardiologists - 21% reduction in payment, on average.

Of course, this will not improve the system. Some docs will just stop taking new Medicare patients, some will reduce staff, and some will quickly go to no Medicare accepted, (perhaps No insurance accepted at all) fee for service plans.

It will all work out. *Eyeroll*

//

83 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:09:57pm

re: #81 HoosierHoops

A world class company hires world class people...

See my #55. I work for a Fortune 500 company that has a worldwide presence

84 Killgore Trout  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:10:34pm

re: #79 sattv4u2

I'm asking if you know how it's going to "reduce costs", in that you're the one that stated it.


Yes, I do. Here's a link for you to ignore: The President's Proposal for Health Reform

The information and rationale is widely available for anyone who wants to learn how the bill is supposed to work.

85 SteveC  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:10:39pm

re: #83 sattv4u2

A world class company hires world class people...

See my #55. I work for a Fortune 500 company that has a worldwide presence

And you hang around with us?!?! :)

86 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:11:05pm

re: #82 SteveC

It will all work out. *Eyeroll*

Are eyerolls going to be covered? Sisters dentures!?!?!

87 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:11:21pm

re: #77 Decatur Deb

I lost the diploma argument with my code monkey son years ago. He's done well, but I still see him at a disadvantage if he ever needed to get past an intern that's screening cv's.

ANd I see the "problem." Yes, if the company has a standing rules about degrees, your resume may get passed up automatically if they don't see a degree.

It's fair, that's their rules, I just have had to always play the game harder, that's all.

88 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:11:27pm

re: #85 SteveC

And you hang around with us?!?! :)

what can I say

I lost a bet

89 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:12:58pm

re: #84 Killgore Trout

Yes, I do. Here's a link for you to ignore: The President's Proposal for Health Reform

The information and rationale is widely available for anyone who wants to learn how the bill is supposed to work.

(and again, with the snark from you ,,,,)
link scmink (and btw ,, i've already seen that)

I want YOUR words, ,,, YOUR explanation

90 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:13:06pm

re: #72 Walter L. Newton

...snip

I've been told by IT recruiters, you know, "off record" that my age will make it difficult to find full time work.

That's just the facts, and I have been dealing with the facts the for over 5 years now.

The age discrimination thing is real, even you're not asking to do heavy lifting. The potential impact on the employer's insurance bill is part of that (until we Dems cut healthcare away from employment). You might just be in the vanguard of the new, improved, post-industrial, post-fulltime wave.

91 Randall Gross  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:13:46pm

Our pale blue dot, watch this in HD if you have the BW
[Link: noblesseoblige.org...]

92 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:14:08pm

re: #89 sattv4u2

(and again, with the snark from you ,,,)
link scmink (and btw ,, i've already seen that)

I want YOUR words, ,,, YOUR explanation

come on KT put up...

93 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:14:28pm

re: #83 sattv4u2

A world class company hires world class people...

See my #55. I work for a Fortune 500 company that has a worldwide presence

And I know your company, and they have many employees who are not degreed. And many of those people have been innovators in your companies field of expertise.

I have know a good amount of your employees, even done contract work for ex-employees of your company who have opened their own start ups.

The employees and ex-employees of your company that I know got into the business when the business was just wet behind the ears. They help shape the industry, and there was no degrees involved at the time.

94 Kragar  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:16:49pm

In my office, we have had more than a couple people with degrees and certifications who get fired because they dont have a clue what to do with a computer in a production environment. All the long term employees are those of us with practical experience and the ability to pick up and develop new skills as we go.

95 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:17:03pm

re: #93 Walter L. Newton

Thanks Walter

BTW ,, I've made a few calls (will make more next week) How far are you from Broomfield?

96 SteveC  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:17:07pm

re: #86 sattv4u2

It will all work out. *Eyeroll*

Are eyerolls going to be covered? Sisters dentures!?!?!

The Ophthalmologists can't see it, and the dentists aren't going to bite on that one...

97 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:17:49pm

re: #96 SteveC

The Ophthalmologists can't see it, and the dentists aren't going to bite on that one...

I'm sure it's nothing to sneeze at, said my allergist!

98 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:18:12pm

re: #90 Decatur Deb

The age discrimination thing is real, even you're not asking to do heavy lifting. The potential impact on the employer's insurance bill is part of that (until we Dems cut healthcare away from employment). You might just be in the vanguard of the new, improved, post-industrial, post-fulltime wave.

I can do heavy lifting. I just spent two months in a thrift store running a used furniture department. I lifted and moved all kinds of furniture, stuff that even some of our younger employees couldn't handle by themselves.

I left that job for reasons other than the physical nature of the work. For a matter of fact, I was kind of grooving on the physical nature of the work.

But even as a cube-bound programmer, companies are still concerned that I am a burden on their benefit premiums, and they are also scared I may die in my cube.

99 solomonpanting  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:18:12pm

What with an estimated $60 billion dollars a year in fraud from Medicare, one would think this problem would be among the first to be solved before compounding that figure.

100 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:18:44pm

re: #96 SteveC

The Ophthalmologists can't see it, and the dentists aren't going to bite on that one...

The obstetricians can hardly bear it.

101 SteveC  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:19:15pm

re: #97 sattv4u2

I'm sure it's nothing to sneeze at, said my allergist!

The Surgeons want to cut as much as possible, but the Cardiologists just don't have the heart.

102 Killgore Trout  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:20:01pm

re: #89 sattv4u2

(and again, with the snark from you ,,,)
link scmink (and btw ,, i've already seen that)

I want YOUR words, ,,, YOUR explanation

No, it's not worth the time. I don't get the gimmick of pretending to not understand the ideas behind the bill. You are free to agree or disagree but to just pretend that you don't understand is silly. You aren't going to win many debates with that tactic.

103 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:20:41pm

re: #95 sattv4u2

Thanks Walter

BTW ,, I've made a few calls (will make more next week) How far are you from Broomfield?

30 miles. I know where your Broomfield office is. Very familiar with it. As I say, I've known/know a number of ex-employees from there.

I am going to send you my resume. You may be surprised to see some NOC experience on there that would fix in with your companies type of operations. I set up a tier one NOC team for a small start up that was owned by some of your ex-employees.

Resume incoming.

104 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:21:37pm

re: #99 solomonpanting

What with an estimated $60 billion dollars a year in fraud from Medicare, one would think this problem would be among the first to be solved before compounding that figure.

Maddening thing is, both sides say they "KNOW" there is all that fraud and waste in Medicare, but it's going to take a Health Care Reform Bill to eliminate it !?!?!

I would think if ine side or the other would just tackle that, the goodwill they would earn from the public would carry them into office for DECADES !

105 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:21:39pm

re: #99 solomonpanting

What with an estimated $60 billion dollars a year in fraud from Medicare, one would think this problem would be among the first to be solved before compounding that figure.

Bingo. Now replace the word fraud with the word pork and we start to see a picture forming... hows about we make fraud a hanging offense?

106 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:22:25pm

re: #103 Walter L. Newton

What sort of programming languages do you specialise in if I may ask?

107 SteveC  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:22:40pm

re: #105 brookly red

Bingo. Now replace the word fraud with the word pork and we start to see a picture forming... hows about we make fraud a hanging offense?

That should make unemployment go down - we're going to need a LOT of rope!

108 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:23:00pm

re: #102 Killgore Trout

No, it's not worth the time. I don't get the gimmick of pretending to not understand the ideas behind the bill. You are free to agree or disagree but to just pretend that you don't understand is silly. You aren't going to win many debates with that tactic.

actually he did just win the debate... you lost by default.

109 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:23:34pm

re: #102 Killgore Trout

No, it's not worth the time. I don't get the gimmick of pretending to not understand the ideas behind the bill. You are free to agree or disagree but to just pretend that you don't understand is silly. You aren't going to win many debates with that tactic.

As oppossed to the "tactic" of just pasting a link as your heartfelt, thoughtful explanation to a question!

"not worth the time"

TRANSLATION ,,,,, "the bad man is trying to get me to say what I think!!"

110 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:23:53pm

re: #106 Bagua

What sort of programming languages do you specialise in if I may ask?

SUMMARY:
Twelve years working experience with Oracle forms and reports (6i, 9i), Oracle database 9i, 10g, PL/SQL, database level triggers and stored procedures. Also have strong Access, Visual Basic and Visual FoxPro programming experience. Have programmed custom software applications from analysis to finished product. Applications developed include commercial products and custom in-house systems for health care, finance, affirmative action, human resources, work order tracking, POS, inventory and legal systems. Also responsible for documentation, training, manuals and testing plans

(and this only really cover the last 15 years, otherwise my CV would be like a small novelette)

111 A Man for all Seasons  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:24:22pm

re: #94 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

In my office, we have had more than a couple people with degrees and certifications who get fired because they dont have a clue what to do with a computer in a production environment. All the long term employees are those of us with practical experience and the ability to pick up and develop new skills as we go.

I understand...I work in a different culture..Last I checked My company was like #10 or something in the world...You don't get to be a mail boy without a degree from college...We develop your talents once you get hired...Last week we offered discounts to take on-line specific courses from Harvard...Every year I have an account my company pays into of 3000 dollars to take any College course I want..Anything..Just spend the money and learn stuff...
I love these guys....

112 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:24:45pm

re: #103 Walter L. Newton

30 miles. I know where your Broomfield office is. Very familiar with it. As I say, I've known/know a number of ex-employees from there.

I am going to send you my resume. You may be surprised to see some NOC experience on there that would fix in with your companies type of operations. I set up a tier one NOC team for a small start up that was owned by some of your ex-employees.

Resume incoming.

Got it. I'll talk to some people who know some people ,,,, etc etc,,,,, and forward it to HR

113 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:25:11pm

re: #102 Killgore Trout

No, it's not worth the time. I don't get the gimmick of pretending to not understand the ideas behind the bill. You are free to agree or disagree but to just pretend that you don't understand is silly. You aren't going to win many debates with that tactic.

It's also more than possible that some people don't care or don't know what the ideas are, which is why they don't want to read links.
If it's Obama, they're agi'n it.

114 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:25:51pm

Now this is silly...

Gatorade drops sponsorship of Tiger Woods

There should be some way to work Gatorade into the sex and stamina angle.

115 SteveC  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:26:07pm

The world famous Cardiologist died, and hundreds of doctors showed up for his funeral. They stood in wonder at the 15 foot tall granite heart that served as his grave. They were even more awestruck at the push of a button, as the heart opened up, the coffin automatically slid inside the hollow heart, and the monument closed around the body.

"I wonder if they make those for my specialty," mused the gynecologist.

116 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:26:34pm

re: #107 SteveC

That should make unemployment go down - we're going to need a LOT of rope!

I am down. let's hang the corrupt.

117 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:27:03pm

re: #115 SteveC

The world famous Cardiologist died, and hundreds of doctors showed up for his funeral. They stood in wonder at the 15 foot tall granite heart that served as his grave. They were even more awestruck at the push of a button, as the heart opened up, the coffin automatically slid inside the hollow heart, and the monument closed around the body.

"I wonder if they make those for my specialty," mused the gynecologist.

{groan}!

118 solomonpanting  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:27:28pm

re: #114 Walter L. Newton

Now this is silly...

Gatorade drops sponsorship of Tiger Woods

There should be some way to work Gatorade into the sex and stamina angle.


"Gatorade: Now Fortified With Viagra"

119 SteveC  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:27:51pm

re: #118 solomonpanting

"Gatorade: Now Fortified With Viagra"

JUST DO IT

120 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:28:10pm

re: #114 Walter L. Newton

re: #118 solomonpanting

"Gatorade: Now Fortified With Viagra"

"When you have to get up for the big game, drink Gatorade!"

121 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:28:15pm

re: #110 Walter L. Newton

Wow, that is diverse experience in a number of industries, and that is not even including your work with the scientists.

122 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:28:39pm

re: #121 Bagua

Wow, that is diverse experience in a number of industries, and that is not even including your work with the scientists.

Nor his schlepping!

123 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:29:16pm

re: #122 sattv4u2

Nor his schlepping!

That I'm very current with with all the recent updates.

124 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:29:53pm

re: #116 brookly red

I am down. let's hang the corrupt.

But we'd need 538 old nuns to replace them, and I don't think we have that many to spare.

125 SteveC  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:30:00pm

re: #120 sattv4u2

re: #118 solomonpanting

"When you have to get up for the big game, drink Gatorade!"

She: "You comin' back, honey?"

He: "Be there in a second, babe! *looks in refrigerator* "Now where did I put that bottle of Big G?"

126 Killgore Trout  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:30:02pm

re: #113 iceweasel

It's also more than possible that some people don't care or don't know what the ideas are, which is why they don't want to read links.
If it's Obama, they're agi'n it.

It's the same tactic commonly used by creationists. They pretend to not understand how evolution works (which every 10th grade student can comprehend) and then pretend they're wining the debate.

127 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:31:13pm

re: #126 Killgore Trout

they're wining the debate

and dining!

128 solomonpanting  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:31:39pm

Gatorade: It'll make your putter rise.

129 goddamnedfrank  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:32:09pm

ATTENTION ALL HUMANS, Jenny McCarthy want's us to know something:

After years of speaking publicly about her belief that MMR shots (immunization for measles, mumps, and rubella) caused her son to suffer from autism, Jenny McCarthy now faces the reality that her 7-year-old son Evan — who no longer shows any signs of autism — may likely have lived with completely different illness.

A new article in Time magazine — which Jenny was interviewed for — suggests Evan suffers from Landau-Kleffner syndrome, “a rare childhood neurological disorder that can also result in speech impairment and possible long-term neurological damage.”

...

And though her son may never have had autism, Jenny insists, “I’ll continue to be the voice” of the disease.

THAT IS ALL

130 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:33:36pm

Yes it does. At the National Renewable Energy Lab my main job responsibility was a IT work order tracking application I wrote and a facility management system I wrote.

My other duties included dealing with all the little stand alone software applications that individuals in different departments would write for themselves and then come whining to me when the damn things wouldn't work.

That's the scientist angle. A lot of these scientist, and research assistants would write some little applications for themselves to track their scientific data, but these dudes were not programmers by profession and they always designed themselves into a corner.

Sort of like what "Tim" did at CRU and Ian had to clean up the mess. I relate a lot to Ian Harris. He's my hero.

131 prairiefire  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:33:54pm

Dinner conversation from my seven year old son: "Dad, can you eat yourself to stay alive? If you were the last thing left?"

132 Kragar  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:34:05pm

We're on a conference call and one of the managers is working from home and forgot his phone was not on mute. We all just clearly heard his wife ask "Are you gonna put some pants on?" and his reply "Hell no woman! I'm freeballing tonight!"

133 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:34:10pm

re: #124 Decatur Deb

But we'd need 538 old nuns to replace them, and I don't think we have that many to spare.

well anything less is a cop out... here I offer an end to all partisan bickering, hang the corrupt. Anyone opposed I accuse as an enemy of the people.

134 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:34:35pm

re: #128 solomonpanting

Gatorade: It'll make your putter rise.

Urbad legend,,, or not!!

Mrs. Arnold Palmer on the Tonight Show with Johnnie Carson

JC, "So ,,, before a big match do you do anything special for luck?"
Mrs AP "Why yes, Johnnie ,,, I kiss his balls"

JC "That must make his putter grow!"

((I do NOt want to know it didn't happen!!))

((( Mr Carson ,,,, you are missed!!!))))

135 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:34:49pm

Wow, I thought I hit quote when I replied to you... again...

re: #121 Bagua

Wow, that is diverse experience in a number of industries, and that is not even including your work with the scientists.

Yes it does. At the National Renewable Energy Lab my main job responsibility was a IT work order tracking application I wrote and a facility management system I wrote.

My other duties included dealing with all the little stand alone software applications that individuals in different departments would write for themselves and then come whining to me when the damn things wouldn't work.

That's the scientist angle. A lot of these scientist, and research assistants would write some little applications for themselves to track their scientific data, but these dudes were not programmers by profession and they always designed themselves into a corner.

Sort of like what "Tim" did at CRU and Ian had to clean up the mess. I relate a lot to Ian Harris. He's my hero.

136 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:35:01pm

re: #126 Killgore Trout

It's the same tactic commonly used by creationists. They pretend to not understand how evolution works (which every 10th grade student can comprehend) and then pretend they're wining the debate.

Exactly.
I gave up on discussing HCR here this summer. I'd read the first bill and spent way too much time patiently explaining what was in it and providing many, many links.
Then we had that thread which was for people to put their questions about HCR-- it included such genius questions as 'where can I find it online', as well as other more complicated ones, which I had answered multiple times.
That's when I said "Fuck it". Providing information is cool, dealing with willful ignorance is not.

137 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:35:15pm

re: #119 SteveC

JUST DO IT

"Is it in you?"

(yes, thats a real slogan)

138 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:35:20pm

re: #129 goddamnedfrank

...

And though her son may never have had autism, Jenny insists, “I’ll continue to be the voice” of the disease.

I guess Ebola was taken.

139 solomonpanting  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:35:53pm

re: #129 goddamnedfrank

Perhaps someone will do a study showing a correlation between autism and silicone breast implants.

140 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:36:26pm

re: #131 prairiefire

Dinner conversation from my seven year old son: "Dad, can you eat yourself to stay alive? If you were the last thing left?"

After choking on your food ,, what did you give as an answer!?!?!?

141 Kragar  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:36:35pm

re: #129 goddamnedfrank

ATTENTION ALL HUMANS, Jenny McCarthy want's us to know something:

THAT IS ALL

I will continue to be an expert on manual breast exams, freely giving my services, despite my having no actual experience of how to conduct one in the field of medicine.

142 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:36:36pm

re: #136 iceweasel

Exactly.
I gave up on discussing HCR here this summer. I'd read the first bill and spent way too much time patiently explaining what was in it and providing many, many links.
Then we had that thread which was for people to put their questions about HCR-- it included such genius questions as 'where can I find it online', as well as other more complicated ones, which I had answered multiple times.
That's when I said "Fuck it". Providing information is cool, dealing with willful ignorance is not.

Or concerned trolls.

143 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:36:52pm

re: #132 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

We're on a conference call and one of the managers is working from home and forgot his phone was not on mute. We all just clearly heard his wife ask "Are you gonna put some pants on?" and his reply "Hell no woman! I'm freeballing tonight!"

ROFLMAO!

Just last week we heard "mommy, I gotta go pee!"

144 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:38:49pm

re: #131 prairiefire

Dinner conversation from my seven year old son: "Dad, can you eat yourself to stay alive? If you were the last thing left?"

He's been reading too much Swift, or viewing too much Bosch.

Image: bosch21.jpg

145 prairiefire  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:39:43pm

re: #140 sattv4u2

My husband answered "Why would you want to do that?', which isn't a great answer since my son had already said "if you were the last thing left."
On to watching "Wild, Wild West", season 2.

146 Kragar  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:40:18pm

re: #143 Racer X

ROFLMAO!

Just last week we heard "mommy, I gotta go pee!"

Our all time favorite moment was during an emergency call, when people who didn't need to be involved were stepping in and making completely wrong command decisions over the call, someone rings out with "CLUSTERFUCK!!!" in a singsong voice. Everyone got quiet, no one would fess up and finally the guy running the call asks "OK, I think someone has a better idea of how we should handle this, any suggestions?", then we got down to actually fixing the issue.

147 Randall Gross  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:40:26pm

re: #131 prairiefire

Dinner conversation from my seven year old son: "Dad, can you eat yourself to stay alive? If you were the last thing left?"

Best Whacky News Headline ever:

"Boy Trapped in Fridge Eats Own Foot to Survive"

148 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:40:36pm

re: #142 Walter L. Newton

Or concerned trolls.

Exactly. You remember, Walter-- you concern trolled about that bill for a while, until you shifted your concern trolling efforts to AGW and the CRU.

149 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:41:04pm

re: #131 prairiefire

Dinner conversation from my seven year old son: "Dad, can you eat yourself to stay alive? If you were the last thing left?"

Used to call my son "my little monkey". I would bend at the waist, hang my right arm straight down, and he would wrap is arms and legs around it and I would swing him back and forth with him yelling 'Monkey on a tree"

One night, we were in a liquor store and I had him on my shoulders. there was a display for some drink and it was a big cut out of a monkey. I told my son "look ,, that monkey has a tail just like you". in his biggest voice he yelled out ' I don't have a tail ,, I have a penis!"

150 JustABill  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:44:15pm

re: #114 Walter L. Newton

Now this is silly...

Gatorade drops sponsorship of Tiger Woods

There should be some way to work Gatorade into the sex and stamina angle.

I heard Nike is sticking with Tiger. Got to remember their slogan...

"Just Do It"

151 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:44:42pm

re: #148 iceweasel

Exactly. You remember, Walter-- you concern trolled about that bill for a while, until you shifted your concern trolling efforts to AGW and the CRU.

Concerned trolling, whatever, call it want you would like, would it make any difference if I was the Head of the AGW Deniers?

Linking to factual articles and making comments about genuine concerns that the Royal Society, The MET, environmental writer Fred Pearce, Kevin Trenberth and many others have about the CRU and the IPCC process, procedures and policy is not changed one bit by any title you want to pin on me.

152 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:45:23pm

re: #149 sattv4u2

Used to call my son "my little monkey". I would bend at the waist, hang my right arm straight down, and he would wrap is arms and legs around it and I would swing him back and forth with him yelling 'Monkey on a tree"

One night, we were in a liquor store and I had him on my shoulders. there was a display for some drink and it was a big cut out of a monkey. I told my son "look ,, that monkey has a tail just like you". in his biggest voice he yelled out ' I don't have a tail ,, I have a penis!"

well the penis tax does not start till 2011...

153 JustABill  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:47:41pm

Damn, too slow...

154 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:48:27pm

re: #129 goddamnedfrank

ATTENTION ALL HUMANS, Jenny McCarthy want's us to know something:

THAT IS ALL

So first he was an Indigo child, no, wait, a Crystal, and then he was autistic, but she cured him with plant food, and now it was something else completely?

My question still stands. Why should we worry about vaccinations causing autism if we can cure autism with plant food at home?

//

155 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:49:39pm

23,000 now expected to lose jobs after shuttle retirement

We have outsourced their functions to the Russians.

156 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:49:51pm

re: #151 Walter L. Newton

Concerned trolling, whatever, call it want you would like, would it make any difference if I was the Head of the AGW Deniers?

Linking to factual articles and making comments about genuine concerns that the Royal Society, The MET, environmental writer Fred Pearce, Kevin Trenberth and many others have about the CRU and the IPCC process, procedures and policy is not changed one bit by any title you want to pin on me.

You're not a denier, you just have 'concerns'. We get it.

157 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:49:54pm

re: #152 brookly red

That's federal. Nevada has been at it for some time.

158 Kragar  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:50:48pm

Amazing Street Drummer in action

159 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:51:01pm

re: #154 SanFranciscoZionist

So first he was an Indigo child, no, wait, a Crystal, and then he was autistic, but she cured him with plant food, and now it was something else completely?

My question still stands. Why should we worry about vaccinations causing autism if we can cure autism with plant food at home?

//

Is it in any way possible that her child is just developmentally challenged because a mother who hasn't let the child grow up in a normal healthy way... the child is not a something to project her every bizarre theory on.

160 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:52:40pm

re: #156 iceweasel

You're not a denier, you just have 'concerns'. We get it.

I'm what ever you feel a need to call me. Doesn't bother me, doesn't change anything, nor does it stop me from stating my opinions, and debating the topic... which I will continue to do.

So... don't give up.

161 Cato the Elder  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:54:13pm

re: #155 Racer X

23,000 now expected to lose jobs after shuttle retirement

We have outsourced their functions to the Russians.

The shuttles, as I recalled, were already slated for retirement under Bush.

They have far outlived their intended lifespans.

162 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:54:15pm

re: #157 Decatur Deb

That's federal. Nevada has been at it for some time.

I am looking at Costa Rica, but I ain't growing old in this here...

163 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:54:35pm

re: #159 Walter L. Newton

Is it in any way possible that her child is just developmentally challenged because a mother who hasn't let the child grow up in a normal healthy way... the child is not a something to project her every bizarre theory on.

I have no idea what's the matter with the child, or if anything is, in fact, the matter with him. I just find the complexity of this saga, and her ability to create one piece of self-glorifying drama after another out of it rather fascinating.

164 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:55:31pm

re: #163 SanFranciscoZionist

I have no idea what's the matter with the child, or if anything is, in fact, the matter with him. I just find the complexity of this saga, and her ability to create one piece of self-glorifying drama after another out of it rather fascinating.

I find it a bit tragic.

165 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:55:46pm

re: #160 Walter L. Newton

I'm what ever you feel a need to call me. Doesn't bother me, doesn't change anything, nor does it stop me from stating my opinions, and debating the topic... which I will continue to do.

So... don't give up.

It is very important to establish ones True Faith™ apparently. Questions and concerns could indicate a tendency towards heresy and indicate an early warning sign of denial-ism.

166 sattv4u2  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:57:09pm

And on that note ,,, time for the long drive home. See you all in the morning

167 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:57:28pm

re: #161 Cato the Elder

The shuttles, as I recalled, were already slated for retirement under Bush.

They have far outlived their intended lifespans.

True.

Sad, but true. I wish that we had our shit together and had the next generation ship ready.

168 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:57:47pm

re: #160 Walter L. Newton

I'm what ever you feel a need to call me. Doesn't bother me, doesn't change anything, nor does it stop me from stating my opinions, and debating the topic... which I will continue to do.

So... don't give up.

No one's asked you to give up, Walter.
Here's a little something I posted the night before your treatise on coding errors.
What can I tell you-- I called it.
Shine on, you crazy diamond! :)

169 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:57:49pm

re: #162 brookly red

Better check the deli first. A retired friend likes Belize.

170 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:58:45pm

re: #166 sattv4u2

And on that note ,,, time for the long drive home. See you all in the morning

Drive safe.

171 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 4:59:23pm

re: #169 Decatur Deb

Better check the deli first. A retired friend likes Belize.

Belize is good...

172 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:02:55pm

re: #76 Killgore Trout

For those of you planing your spring garden you might want to consider adding mushrooms. Outdoor Mushroom Patches work well and I've used them in the past. This year I'm trying the "Three Amigos". I'll let you know how it goes.

Thank you for that.

173 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:04:00pm

re: #164 Walter L. Newton

I find it a bit tragic.

Oh, it is.

174 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:05:15pm

re: #171 brookly red

Belize is good...

We buy a Florida lottery ticket every few months, "so we can move to Florida". That's what I tell my wife. If we hit big, we're going back to the West Side, and 1962.

175 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:05:52pm

You goin' out there? Alright, let's get this thing moving.

Someday Baby


- RLB
176 Randall Gross  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:06:10pm

Ok declaring FNDT...

177 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:06:14pm

re: #168 iceweasel

No one's asked you to give up, Walter.
Here's a little something I posted the night before your treatise on coding errors.
What can I tell you-- I called it.
Shine on, you crazy diamond! :)

You are 100 percent correct. I did not find any coding error or data errors... Ian Harris did, enough to fill 314 pages of narrative between 2006 and Dec. 2009... I was just the messenger. His "report" was enough to instigate an inquiry by the Royal Society, which will look into the way the CRU handled it's data processing, which will be complete in the spring, which was enough to instigate an inquiry by the British MET, which will be a 3 year study that will actually look at the validity of the data ITSELF and which was enough to make even the most pro-AGW popular media writers to consider the problems.

Yes you called it... and so did Ian Harris.

178 A Man for all Seasons  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:06:48pm

Here comes our snow storm tonight...Move shoveling the driveway..
Why do you hate me God?
*wink*

179 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:08:47pm

re: #176 Thanos

Ok declaring FNDT...


[Video]

Zoom, dad, zoom!

180 reine.de.tout  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:08:55pm

re: #172 Bagua

Thank you for that.

For a handy collection of all of Killgore's recommendations, click here.

Or click my nic on any comment I've made, it brings you right to the cookbook blog where Killgore's recommendations are collected.

181 A Man for all Seasons  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:10:15pm

re: #178 HoosierHoops

Here comes our snow storm tonight...Move More shoveling the driveway..
Why do you hate me God?
*wink*


In this case in proper English usage .. Move = More

182 wrenchwench  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:10:16pm

re: #176 Thanos

Ok declaring FNDT...


[Video]

I worked with a guy in Seattle who took his out of town visitors by the Space Needle and told them, "This is where they filmed the Jetsons." One guest reportedly responded, "Ooooh, really?!?"

183 Ziggy Standard  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:13:07pm

Bill Donohue and others are raging out over this :

Right wing slams White House for meeting with atheist ‘hate groups’

Some conservative commentators are accusing the Obama administration of inviting "hate groups" into the White House by holding a meeting with a coalition of secularist and atheist groups.

Officials from the Justice and Health and Human Services departments met Friday with representatives of the Secular Coalition for America, an umbrella group that includes American Atheists and the Council for Secular Humanism. The coalition called it "the first time in history a presidential administration has met for a policy briefing with the American nontheist community."

continued...

[Link: rawstory.com...]

184 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:13:24pm

re: #177 Walter L. Newton

All the comments about corrupt databases, imaginary stations, fudge factors, untraceable data was very confidence building. The MET Office was so impressed, they plan to take three years to re-examine 160 years of temperature data.

The new analysis of the data will take three years, meaning that the Met Office will not be able to state with absolute confidence the extent of the warming trend until the end of 2012

It would appear the MET Office is also a 'concern troll' and secret Denier.

185 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:13:58pm

re: #183 Jimmah

Well... it's about time.

186 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:14:24pm

re: #180 reine.de.tout

For a handy collection of all of Killgore's recommendations, click here.

Or click my nic on any comment I've made, it brings you right to the cookbook blog where Killgore's recommendations are collected.

Are those cooking specific, or also gardening?

187 Randall Gross  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:14:57pm

re: #179 iceweasel

I still have an Andy Prieboy EP in the basement somewhere with him singing Eye Protection's hit song Elroy Jetson....

The only line I recall is "Elroy Jetson .... he's a 21st century spy..." It was kind of a punk version of "Secret Agent Man" blended with cartoon kitsch.

/of course most folks don't even know what the hell I am talking about here...

188 brookly red  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:15:56pm

re: #174 Decatur Deb

We buy a Florida lottery ticket every few months, "so we can move to Florida". That's what I tell my wife. If we hit big, we're going back to the West Side, and 1962.

I am thinking Tia land... the gf wants a Spanish speaking country... we both agree that we have worked too hard for too long to sleep on a park bench & give our money to the government. Hint: businesses feel the same way...

189 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:16:33pm

re: #177 Walter L. Newton

You are 100 percent correct. I did not find any coding error or data errors... Ian Harris did, enough to fill 314 pages of narrative between 2006 and Dec. 2009... I was just the messenger. His "report" was enough to instigate an inquiry by the Royal Society, which will look into the way the CRU handled it's data processing, which will be complete in the spring, which was enough to instigate an inquiry by the British MET, which will be a 3 year study that will actually look at the validity of the data ITSELF and which was enough to make even the most pro-AGW popular media writers to consider the problems.

Yes you called it... and so did Ian Harris.

The deal was that you were going to show that inaccurate data has been produced and used in the real world.

What you showed was a record of comments by a programmer, documenting finding and fixing bugs, and his frustration at dealing with datasets that were in many different formats and had other problems.

In other words, the same kind of comments you might find in almost any non-trivial piece of software. Bugs were found. Bugs were fixed. This is news?

You didn't show what you claimed you would, sorry.

190 Ziggy Standard  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:16:43pm

re: #185 Walter L. Newton

Well... it's about time.

Makes a nice change from the likes of Haggard and Falwell, that's for sure!

191 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:16:44pm

re: #187 Thanos

I still have an Andy Prieboy EP in the basement somewhere with him singing Eye Protection's hit song Elroy Jetson...

The only line I recall is "Elroy Jetson ... he's a 21st century spy..." It was kind of a punk version of "Secret Agent Man" blended with cartoon kitsch.

/of course most folks don't even know what the hell I am talking about here...

Oh that sounds great!
Violent Femmes covered Epp Opp Ork Ah Ah at one point.

192 reine.de.tout  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:16:48pm

re: #186 Bagua

Are those cooking specific, or also gardening?

A mixture. So far there are 27 or 28 different things. Click on the Killgore's GArdening Tips "tag" (upper right under "killgore's collection), and you'll get just the posts related to gardening, cooking, etc.

193 Killgore Trout  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:16:56pm

re: #180 reine.de.tout

There's also a recipe for quick homemade ricotta here. I think I'll give that a try this weekend.

194 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:17:29pm

re: #192 reine.de.tout

A mixture. So far there are 27 or 28 different things. Click on the Killgore's GArdening Tips "tag" (upper right under "killgore's collection), and you'll get just the posts related to gardening, cooking, etc.

Cool, thanks. I'll look it over.

195 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:18:39pm

re: #184 Bagua

All the comments about corrupt databases, imaginary stations, fudge factors, untraceable data was very confidence building. The MET Office was so impressed, they plan to take three years to re-examine 160 years of temperature data.

The new analysis of the data will take three years, meaning that the Met Office will not be able to state with absolute confidence the extent of the warming trend until the end of 2012

It would appear the MET Office is also a 'concern troll' and secret Denier.

And for those who would complain that the article is in the TIMES, and there for invalid for some reason... then see the information at the MET office press page...

[Link: www.metoffice.gov.uk...]

196 goddamnedfrank  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:19:13pm

re: #182 wrenchwench

I worked with a guy in Seattle who took his out of town visitors by the Space Needle and told them, "This is where they filmed the Jetsons." One guest reportedly responded, "Ooooh, really?!?"

I grew up near Seattle. When I was little there was this radio ad jingle for the Mariners that went "Come see the M's TONIGHT!" I was young and didn't make the connection, so I asked my Dad what "M's" were. He told me that every time people held a baseball game there is a winning team and a losing team, and the losing team get's called "the M's." I believed that for years.

197 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:19:18pm

re: #184 Bagua

All the comments about corrupt databases, imaginary stations, fudge factors, untraceable data was very confidence building. The MET Office was so impressed, they plan to take three years to re-examine 160 years of temperature data.

The new analysis of the data will take three years, meaning that the Met Office will not be able to state with absolute confidence the extent of the warming trend until the end of 2012

It would appear the MET Office is also a 'concern troll' and secret Denier.

No, they're just acting like all bureaucrats have acted since the beginning of recorded history, and covering their asses by spending public money for something that isn't really needed, except for public relations.

198 prairiefire  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:19:28pm

re: #174 Decatur Deb

We buy a Florida lottery ticket every few months, "so we can move to Florida". That's what I tell my wife. If we hit big, we're going back to the West Side, and 1962.

Aw, that's sweet.

199 reine.de.tout  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:20:12pm

re: #193 Killgore Trout

There's also a recipe for quick homemade ricotta here. I think I'll give that a try this weekend.

Got it.
Now, you have to let us know how it comes out so I can update that post!
Please.

200 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:21:10pm

re: #197 Charles

Its funny how those evil govmint bureaucrats are all of a sudden doing good important work when its something you like >

"They're corrupt and evil except when it fits my adenda!"

201 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:21:18pm
202 sngnsgt  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:22:24pm

Now here's a good laugh for a Friday afternoon:

Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of Economics and Political Science correlated data on these behaviors with IQ from a large national U.S. sample and found that, on average, people who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs.

www.cnn.com

203 wrenchwench  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:22:47pm

re: #196 goddamnedfrank

I grew up near Seattle. When I was little there was this radio ad jingle for the Mariners that went "Come see the M's TONIGHT!" I was young and didn't make the connection, so I asked my Dad what "M's" were. He told me that every time people held a baseball game there is a winning team and a losing team, and the losing team get's called "the M's." I believed that for years.

LOL.

I have a Ken Griffey Jr. rookie year chocolate bar. Unopened, in the freezer.

204 Ziggy Standard  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:22:58pm

re: #195 Walter L. Newton

Link from that page:

The Met Office stresses that it does not foresee that the new analyses will reveal any "substantial changes" from the basic conclusion in the last IPCC report, published in 2007, that the recent warming of the earth's climate is "unequivocal." Rather, it explains in its proposal document: "This effort will ensure that the datasets are completely robust and that all methods are transparent."

[Link: www.independent.co.uk...]

205 Randall Gross  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:23:00pm

re: #191 iceweasel

Oh that sounds great!
Violent Femmes covered Epp Opp Ork Ah Ah at one point.

Here's Andy after his Eye Protection days, when he was fronting for Wall of Voodoo

206 Killgore Trout  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:23:06pm

re: #199 reine.de.tout

Got it.
Now, you have to let us know how it comes out so I can update that post!
Please.

Ok, will do.

207 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:24:20pm

re: #188 brookly red

I am thinking Tia land... the gf wants a Spanish speaking country... we both agree that we have worked too hard for too long to sleep on a park bench & give our money to the government. Hint: businesses feel the same way...

Move to Lower Alabama. Plenty of Spanish spoken, and not too much "Yanqui Fuera". Lousy Deli.

208 A Man for all Seasons  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:25:54pm

re: #199 reine.de.tout

Got it.
Now, you have to let us know how it comes out so I can update that post!
Please.

Can't wait for the next cookbook! They make wonderful gifts for Aunts or friends for the holidays...Just buy a bunch Lizards and 75% of all your birthday and holiday shopping is done before spring..It beats a scented candle every time!..

209 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:26:05pm

re: #201 Bagua

If there is nothing to see there, why has The MET Office announce a Proposal for a new international analysis of land surface air temperature data?

Means absolutely nothing. They're doing it to completely answer the International Denier's Chorus, not because they think there's a problem with the data. Read your own link.

210 ShaunP  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:27:10pm

re: #209 Charles

Means absolutely nothing. They're doing it to completely answer the International Denier's Chorus, not because they think there's a problem with the data. Read your own link.

Page 2, second paragraph...

211 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:28:20pm

The MET Office is wasting their time and the public's money, of course, because nothing will ever stop the deniers from doing what they do.

212 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:29:20pm

They're wasting the public's money twice over -- not only will the deniers keep on denying, this three-year review is completely unnecessary in the first place.

213 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:29:56pm

its funny how they clam up when Charles starts posting >>

214 A Man for all Seasons  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:30:46pm

re: #213 windsagio

its funny how they clam up when Charles starts posting >>

LOL
nice observation

215 jaunte  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:31:16pm

re: #208 HoosierHoops

Can't wait for the next cookbook! They make wonderful gifts for Aunts or friends for the holidays...Just buy a bunch Lizards and 75% of all your birthday and holiday shopping is done before spring..It beats a scented candle every time!..

It's on about the 5 yard line...

216 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:31:33pm

I'm still trying to decide if it's worth the effort to write something mocking the Frank Gaffney Missile Defense Logo Sharia Conspiracy.

217 Ziggy Standard  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:32:29pm

re: #211 Charles

The MET Office is wasting their time and the public's money, of course, because nothing will ever stop the deniers from doing what they do.

Yep. They'll just say the Met have spent 3 years covering up and minimising the effect of the errors.

218 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:32:30pm

re: #212 Charles

They're wasting the public's money twice over -- not only will the deniers keep on denying, this three-year review is completely unnecessary in the first place.

Not only that, the denial industry will use it as 'proof' that there's something fishy: "If everything is ok, why's there a review, huh?"
Happening right here on this thread.

219 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:32:42pm

re: #216 Charles

I'm still trying to decide if it's worth the effort to write something mocking the Frank Gaffney Missile Defense Logo Sharia Conspiracy.

Just add it to the Litany of Loons.

220 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:32:53pm

re: #197 Charles

No, they're just acting like all bureaucrats have acted since the beginning of recorded history, and covering their asses by spending public money for something that isn't really needed, except for public relations.

So you are saying the MET Office are just bureaucrats, not scientists? They get hundreds of millions to study the climate and weather but they are bureaucrats?

221 Randall Gross  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:33:21pm

re: #216 Charles

It's already gone as far as it will as far as I can see, but it's a perfect example of the anti-jihad movement's dissolution into paranoid delusions.

222 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:34:25pm

re: #221 Thanos

To explore an (unpopular) pet theory, I think its the line between the people who were shocked and appalled by our own brush with international terrorism and the crazy bigots >

223 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:34:44pm

re: #216 Charles

I'm still trying to decide if it's worth the effort to write something mocking the Frank Gaffney Missile Defense Logo Sharia Conspiracy.

It could be really funny....also Varek Raith has made his own logo mocking it--
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

224 wrenchwench  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:36:04pm

re: #223 iceweasel

It could be really funny...also Varek Raith has made his own logo mocking it--
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

That's the real new logo. He's interpreting it.

225 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:36:30pm

Are you a mod or a rocker?
"I'm a mocker."
- Ringo

226 reine.de.tout  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:37:05pm

re: #208 HoosierHoops

Can't wait for the next cookbook! They make wonderful gifts for Aunts or friends for the holidays...Just buy a bunch Lizards and 75% of all your birthday and holiday shopping is done before spring..It beats a scented candle every time!..

It's coming along . . .
Really.

227 Randall Gross  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:37:26pm

Here's Prieboy's Myspace page, some of his more recent tunes stream there

[Link: www.myspace.com...]

228 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:37:41pm

re: #224 wrenchwench

That's the real new logo. He's interpreting it.

I should have said, his own version or interpretation.

I know what the logo is. I posted TPM's article about Gaffney as well as Media Matters round up about it last night in the Tom Petty thread.

229 jaunte  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:37:43pm

re: #226 reine.de.tout

I'm sitting here drawing right now.

230 The Sanity Inspector  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:38:53pm

J. D. Hayworth was on The O'Reilly Factor tonight. O'Reilly pressed him about his birther statements, and Hayworth said he was Just Asking Questions®. Just stirring the soup, like the hip, happenin' broadcaster that he is.

231 Kragar  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:39:55pm

re: #230 The Sanity Inspector

J. D. Hayworth was on The O'Reilly Factor tonight. O'Reilly pressed him about his birther statements, and Hayworth said he was Just Asking Questions®. Just stirring the soup, like the hip, happenin' broadcaster that he is.

I wonder if J.D. Hayworth still enjoys molesting farm animals. Hey, I'm just asking.

232 A Man for all Seasons  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:40:10pm

re: #228 iceweasel

I should have said, his own version or interpretation.

I know what the logo is. I posted TPM's article about Gaffney as well as Media Matters round up about it last night in the Tom Petty thread.

Correct me if I'm wrong..But I'm sure I read on the Internet today that the Logo was designed well before Obama or the elections

233 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:40:30pm

re: #189 Charles

The deal was that you were going to show that inaccurate data has been produced and used in the real world.

What you showed was a record of comments by a programmer, documenting finding and fixing bugs, and his frustration at dealing with datasets that were in many different formats and had other problems.

In other words, the same kind of comments you might find in almost any non-trivial piece of software. Bugs were found. Bugs were fixed. This is news?

You didn't show what you claimed you would, sorry.

Sorry... was having supper...

I don't agree.

234 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:41:41pm

re: #233 Walter L. Newton

Sorry... was having supper...

I don't agree.

I don't expect you to.

235 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:42:07pm

re: #212 Charles

They're wasting the public's money twice over -- not only will the deniers keep on denying, this three-year review is completely unnecessary in the first place.

Then the MET Office is guilty of malpractice, fraud and waste, that is a bigger story than the CRU controversy.

236 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:42:14pm

re: #232 HoosierHoops

Correct me if I'm wrong..But I'm sure I read on the Internet today that the Logo was designed well before Obama or the elections

That's right. Here's TPM:

By spreading this crazy paranoid conspiracy, Gaffney not only is defaming the President, he is also defaming the people who work and lead the Missile Defense Agency. The idea that the President would pay attention to an agency logo redesign or that the design in anyway reflected some secret Muslim agenda, as Richard Lehner of the Missile Defense Agency noted, “is ridiculous.” Lehner told Fox that “it isn’t a new logo to replace the official logo. It’s a logo developed for recruiting materials and for our public Web site. Also, it was used prior to the 2008 election and it has no link to any political campaign.”

Additionally, the one to approve the new logo is likely the head of the Missile Defense Agency, Lt. General Patrick O’Reilly, someone the right wing must now presumably believe is complicit with Obama’s secret plan to further the United States’ “submission to Islam.”


More at link.

237 ShaunP  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:42:23pm

re: #232 HoosierHoops

Correct me if I'm wrong..But I'm sure I read on the Internet today that the Logo was designed well before Obama or the elections

you are absolutely correct:

[Link: www.washingtonpost.com...]

"Turns out, however, the "new" logo is not so new. "This was a logo that was developed three years ago for our recruiting materials and our public Web site..."

238 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:42:39pm

re: #235 Bagua

So you're shocked that agencies waste money in politically expedient ways?

239 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:43:51pm

re: #238 windsagio

So you're shocked that agencies waste money in politically expedient ways?

Are you saying the MET Office are bureaucrats who waste money on politics as well?

240 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:44:22pm
241 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:45:17pm

re: #211 Charles

The MET Office is wasting their time and the public's money, of course, because nothing will ever stop the deniers from doing what they do.

And you know this is an absolute fact how? The MET office, who has relied on the CRU for much of it's climate change data, who in the past one of the goto places for AGW discussions, now suddenly they are wasting the public money.

It appears that they are not trying to stop anyone from doing anything. More to the point, they want to make sure that the facts and figures are correct.

They are going to spend three years examining surface temperature readings and this is a problem for you?

242 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:45:27pm

re: #239 Bagua

I'm sure they have administrative and executive staff :p

I'm sure that there are various groups in the Brit. Gov't that can put pressure on them too :p

243 A Man for all Seasons  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:46:05pm

re: #237 ShaunP

you are absolutely correct:

[Link: www.washingtonpost.com...]

"Turns out, however, the "new" logo is not so new. "This was a logo that was developed three years ago for our recruiting materials and our public Web site..."

3 years ago! Dang it! It means Bush was in on it...
I always knew Bush was a secret communist!
//

244 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:46:19pm

re: #241 Walter L. Newton

And you know this is an absolute fact how? The MET office, who has relied on the CRU for much of it's climate change data, who in the past one of the goto places for AGW discussions, now suddenly they are wasting the public money.

It appears that they are not trying to stop anyone from doing anything. More to the point, they want to make sure that the facts and figures are correct.

They are going to spend three years examining surface temperature readings and this is a problem for you?

Read the article. The MET says they do not have any reason to suspect problems with the temperature data. It's a PR move, obviously.

245 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:47:05pm

re: #243 HoosierHoops

Bush was an Islamo-Communist? Revelations like that are what keep bringing me back :D

246 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:47:25pm

And from the viewpoint of the MET Office it's a PR move that makes perfect sense. They're trying to do an exhaustive review in the hopes that it will lay the debate to rest.

But it won't.

247 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:47:31pm

re: #238 windsagio

So you're shocked that agencies waste money in politically expedient ways?

No, I'm shocked that the MET office has been one of the many go to sources for pro-AGW information, and suddenly, they decide to examine 169 years of surface temperature data and reading, now suddenly, I'm hearing that it's political, a waste of money and not needed.

Funny how I never heard those thing s said about the MET before now?

248 webevintage  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:47:51pm

Do conservative yappers like Malkin or Beck lack a fucking empathy gene?

[Link: www.balloon-juice.com...]

I'm just asking.

249 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:48:01pm

re: #245 windsagio

Bush was an Islamo-Communist? Revelations like that are what keep bringing me back :D

Well, something that occurred to me a while back was that I can never remember Bush saying the word "Islamofascist". This seems significant to me. What was he hiding?

////////////oh good heavens

250 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:48:22pm
251 Killgore Trout  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:48:42pm

re: #240 Racer X

Vinski the Cat giving a tummy rub to his brother


[Video]

That's not a tummy rub. He's punching him in the bladder. My cats do it to me every morning.

252 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:48:52pm

re: #242 windsagio

I'm sure they have administrative and executive staff :p

I'm sure that there are various groups in the Brit. Gov't that can put pressure on them too :p

You're correct, the government is trying to put pressure on the MET Office...

The Government is attempting to stop the Met Office from carrying out the re-examination, arguing that it would be seized upon by climate change sceptics.

253 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:49:13pm

re: #248 webevintage

Do conservative yappers like Malkin or Beck lack a fucking empathy gene?

[Link: www.balloon-juice.com...]

I'm just asking.

The answer is yes.
That story has been the source for much mockery on wingnut blogs. The comments about it have been horrific.

254 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:49:15pm

re: #248 webevintage

Do conservative yappers like Malkin or Beck lack a fucking empathy gene?

[Link: www.balloon-juice.com...]

I'm just asking.

No. They're assholes of their own free will, it is not a medical condition.

That's my take.

255 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:49:17pm

re: #247 Walter L. Newton

We weren't exposed to them doing waste-of-time politically motivated reviews before?

Seriously, I can't believe you 2 are taking the position that it's all of a sudden so shocking that governmental organizations are subject to political pressure.

256 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:49:22pm

re: #247 Walter L. Newton

No, I'm shocked that the MET office has been one of the many go to sources for pro-AGW information, and suddenly, they decide to examine 169 years of surface temperature data and reading, now suddenly, I'm hearing that it's political, a waste of money and not needed.

Funny how I never heard those thing s said about the MET before now?

Correction 160 years. Finger slip.

257 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:49:42pm

re: #252 Walter L. Newton

You're correct, the government is trying to put pressure on the MET Office...

The Government is attempting to stop the Met Office from carrying out the re-examination, arguing that it would be seized upon by climate change sceptics.

They're right, it will. No matter what conclusions it reaches.

258 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:50:18pm

re: #255 windsagio

We weren't exposed to them doing waste-of-time politically motivated reviews before?

Seriously, I can't believe you 2 are taking the position that it's all of a sudden so shocking that governmental organizations are subject to political pressure.

(Again)

re: #252 Walter L. Newton

You're correct, the government is trying to put pressure on the MET Office...

The Government is attempting to stop the Met Office from carrying out the re-examination, arguing that it would be seized upon by climate change sceptics.

259 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:50:21pm

re: #242 windsagio

I'm sure they have administrative and executive staff :p

I'm sure that there are various groups in the Brit. Gov't that can put pressure on them too :p

I see. You do realise you are making accusations about one of the premier scientific organisations studying climate change? Do you have anything to back up your assertion that they are wasting the public money on fraudulent research for purely political reasons?

260 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:50:30pm

re: #249 SanFranciscoZionist

It all makes sense! Bush let 9/11 happen, and then got us into the war in Iraq just to strengthen the Islamist cause! They must've gotten to him while he was AWOL from the Nat' Guard!


(note--> /)

261 ShaunP  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:51:04pm

re: #259 Bagua

I see. You do realise you are making accusations about one of the premier scientific organisations studying climate change? Do you have anything to back up your assertion that they are wasting the public money on fraudulent research for purely political reasons?

They're wasting money on duplication, not fraudulent research...

262 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:51:29pm

re: #257 Charles

They're right, it will. No matter what conclusions it reaches.

Of course it will. But there is nothing wrong with the review, is there. Because the deniers are going to use this to their own advantage, the MET should not continue with the science. Hmmmmm.... sounds pretty unscientific way to deal with this.

263 Taqyia2Me  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:51:45pm

I heard an old boss of mine is leaving the White House social secretary position...
I'll check out the breaking news sites....

264 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:51:56pm

re: #247 Walter L. Newton

No, I'm shocked that the MET office has been one of the many go to sources for pro-AGW information, and suddenly, they decide to examine 169 years of surface temperature data and reading, now suddenly, I'm hearing that it's political, a waste of money and not needed.

You're hearing that from me because you didn't bother to read it in the article. The MET Office explicitly says they don't expect to find any problems in the data, and that they're doing the review for what amounts to PR reasons.

It's right there. Someone even quoted that section right above.

265 Ziggy Standard  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:52:08pm

The outrage from the denier camp over this data cannot be stopped. It will simply morph, finding one new 'justification' after another.

266 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:52:53pm

I hate to say this, but this is what I'm talking about.

When people aren't willing to actually read the links they themselves post, they're not really interested in actual discussion of the issue.

267 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:52:54pm

re: #265 Jimmah

The outrage from the denier camp over this data cannot be stopped. It will simply morph, finding one new 'justification' after another.

They just want to see the Earth Certificate.

268 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:53:24pm

re: #267 Decatur Deb

That can't be new.

Either way I've never heard that before, so you get credit :D

269 webevintage  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:53:55pm

re: #253 iceweasel

The answer is yes.
That story has been the source for much mockery on wingnut blogs. The comments about it have been horrific.

I amazed that I can still be shocked that people would mock a persons pain and suffering like this, but I am.

270 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:54:03pm

re: #252 Walter L. Newton

You're correct, the government is trying to put pressure on the MET Office...

The Government is attempting to stop the Met Office from carrying out the re-examination, arguing that it would be seized upon by climate change sceptics.

Heh, funny thing when the facts prove the opposite. The Government is desperate to stop this expose as they are funding the MET Office in the hundreds of millions and Climate Research in the billions.

Yet the MET Office scientists decide that a complete re-do of the temperature data sets is required, and they are the politicians? I disagree.

271 prairiefire  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:54:39pm

re: #263 Taqyia2Me

I heard an old boss of mine is leaving the White House social secretary position...
I'll check out the breaking news sites...

You worked for Desiree?

272 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:54:58pm

re: #265 Jimmah

The outrage from the denier camp over this data cannot be stopped. It will simply morph, finding one new 'justification' after another.

That's because deniers, like conspiracy theorists, suffer from confirmation bias. Their beliefs can't be falsified, and all evidence is always only further evidence of just how deep the conspiracy goes!
E.g., "AGW is a hoax":
So, "Why is the MET reviewing data? Because AGW is a hoax!"
vs
"Why isn't the MET conducting a review? What are they trying to hide? It's because AGW is a hoax!"

273 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:55:18pm

re: #270 Bagua

Yet the MET Office scientists decide that a complete re-do of the temperature data sets is required, and they are the politicians? I disagree.

No, not "a complete re-do." A review of the existing data. Please ... try a little harder.

274 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:55:29pm

re: #268 windsagio

That can't be new.

Either way I've never heard that before, so you get credit :D

There are only so many words, and I think I've used them all, here.

275 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:55:58pm

Waste of time. We're all gonna die soon anyway. I'm going off the grid and buying a bunch of guns and a new ride.

276 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:56:32pm

re: #264 Charles

You're hearing that from me because you didn't bother to read it in the article. The MET Office explicitly says they don't expect to find any problems in the data, and that they're doing the review for what amounts to PR reasons.

It's right there. Someone even quoted that section right above.

Where do they say they are doing it for PR reasons? I don't see that mentioned in the article.

And I know they say they don't expect to find anything "wrong." I never said they did. But there is nothing wrong with this review, is there? And the Royal Society has also said that in it's review, they are not reexamining the science itself, on the procedure's on how the data was handled.

Full disclosure.

277 Ziggy Standard  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:57:16pm

re: #248 webevintage

Do conservative yappers like Malkin or Beck lack a fucking empathy gene?

[Link: www.balloon-juice.com...]

I'm just asking.

Funny you should mention...

Intelligent people have 'unnatural' preferences and values that are novel in human evolution

More intelligent people are significantly more likely to exhibit social values and religious and political preferences that are novel to the human species in evolutionary history. Specifically, liberalism and atheism, and for men (but not women), preference for sexual exclusivity correlate with higher intelligence, a new study finds.

[Link: www.physorg.com...]

278 Taqyia2Me  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:57:53pm

re: #271 prairiefire

You worked for Desiree?

Yep, she was a toughy even when she was young!

279 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:58:52pm

re: #269 webevintage

I amazed that I can still be shocked that people would mock a persons pain and suffering like this, but I am.

I know. I keep thinking we've seen Peak Wingnut, but it never can happen.
I pretty much decided Malkin was void of all empathy after her treatment of then-12 year old Graeme Frost and his family over the S-CHIP hearings.

280 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:59:19pm

The Top Seven Most Astonishing UFO Encounters

I just want to know one thing - how come UFO sightings dropped off significantly as soon as we all got camera phones?

281 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:59:28pm

re: #261 ShaunP

They're wasting money on duplication, not fraudulent research...

If there is not need for the research and they know the result in advance, then that would in fact be fraudulent research. Which I completely disagree with. They are doing so to:

"The proposed activity would provide:

1. Verifiable data sets starting from a common data-bank of unrestricted data at both monthly and finer temporal resolutions."

Among other things, such as "comprehensive audit trails to deliver confidence in the results"

This is a massive and expensive project, if they are wasting money on duplication, then where is this work that is being duplicated? Waste of money on this scale is a huge scandal.

282 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:59:40pm

re: #248 webevintage

Do conservative yappers like Malkin or Beck lack a fucking empathy gene?

[Link: www.balloon-juice.com...]

I'm just asking.

As long as it makes them money and nets them fame to be terrible people, they'll continue to be terrible people.

283 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 5:59:48pm

re: #257 Charles

They're right, it will. No matter what conclusions it reaches.

And I suspect that a positive outcome in this review will be a nice icing on the cake for the validity of the science... seems like a win-win as far as I'm concerned.

I'm not bother by the outcome of the science, no matter what the deniers rant and rave about.

284 prairiefire  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:00:05pm

re: #278 Taqyia2Me

I read a rumor somewhere on the intertubes that she was descended from Voodoo royalty from New Orleans.
I think it's good she's leaving.

285 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:00:12pm

re: #280 Racer X

The Top Seven Most Astonishing UFO Encounters

I just want to know one thing - how come UFO sightings dropped off significantly as soon as we all got camera phones?

Three Men in Black said, "Don't report this!"

/ETI

286 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:00:17pm

re: #280 Racer X

The Top Seven Most Astonishing UFO Encounters

I just want to know one thing - how come UFO sightings dropped off significantly as soon as we all got camera phones?

They had to stay in cloaking more.

287 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:00:47pm

re: #284 prairiefire

I read a rumor somewhere on the intertubes that she was descended from Voodoo royalty from New Orleans.
I think it's good she's leaving.

I want to start a band called Voodoo Royalty.

288 prairiefire  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:01:04pm

re: #284 prairiefire

Not because of that rumor, because of the uninvited dinner guests.

289 albusteve  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:02:29pm

re: #280 Racer X

The Top Seven Most Astonishing UFO Encounters

I just want to know one thing - how come UFO sightings dropped off significantly as soon as we all got camera phones?

they are here...most likely in the DC area, maybe even working in the Capital

290 Taqyia2Me  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:03:29pm

re: #284 prairiefire

I read a rumor somewhere on the intertubes that she was descended from Voodoo royalty from New Orleans.
I think it's good she's leaving.

I do recall her being from New Orleans, did not know about the voodoo royalty though. Harvard degree. Married the chairman of what is now Ariel Capital Management, iirc...

291 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:03:51pm

re: #289 albusteve

they are here...most likely in the DC area, maybe even working in the Capital

Not as many as you might think.

292 Randall Gross  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:03:56pm

Walls from Rocket Summer - acoustic version

293 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:04:58pm

re: #273 Charles

No, not "a complete re-do." A review of the existing data. Please ... try a little harder.

Proposal For A New International Analysis Of Land Surface Air Temperature Data

So big that they say:


Recognizing that no single institution can undertake such a fundamental data collection, re-analysis and verification process single-handedly, we would envisage this as a broad community effort - a 'grand challenge' so to speak - involving UK and international partners.

That is a pretty big "review".

294 ShaunP  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:05:05pm

re: #281 Bagua

If there is not need for the research and they know the result in advance, then that would in fact be fraudulent research. Which I completely disagree with. They are doing so to:

"The proposed activity would provide:

1. Verifiable data sets starting from a common data-bank of unrestricted data at both monthly and finer temporal resolutions."

Among other things, such as "comprehensive audit trails to deliver confidence in the results"

This is a massive and expensive project, if they are wasting money on duplication, then where is this work that is being duplicated? Waste of money on this scale is a huge scandal.

Which is what people are all complaining about here. Look at the link you provided up-thread. Second page. It outlines that the data exists from multiple studies and they all come to the same conclusion. This does say that it's looking for a level of detail that wasn't previously available though...

295 Ziggy Standard  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:05:12pm

How quickly outrage evolves, right in front of our eyes :

1) This data is suspect and needs to be re-assessed in detail!

2)Whaat? They are reassessing this data just to satisfy the demands of people like me? This is a shocking waste of money, and deeply fraudulent! Why, I simply won't stand for it!

296 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:05:14pm

re: #289 albusteve

they are here...most likely in the DC area, maybe even working in the Capital

Tea Party wet dream:

Image: e7.jpg

297 Taqyia2Me  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:05:45pm

re: #288 prairiefire

Not because of that rumor, because of the uninvited dinner guests.

Gotta give kudos to the administration for low profiling it during the shitstorm and announcing the resignation on a Friday evening.

298 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:06:39pm

re: #293 Bagua

I think Charles said it best about you, Bagua.

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

What you have posted is the usual irrational nonsense you always post about climate change. You are a hardcore denier, and it's incredibly obvious to everyone here who doesn't share your denial what you're doing.

And now you've gone all the way to the bottom, using the exact same arguments used by creationists and accusing people who accept the scientific evidence for climate change of being "religious." It's pathetic, really.

I think it's apropos in this case, as well.

299 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:07:22pm

Sailor Cat, eyes a Seagull.

300 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:07:36pm

re: #294 ShaunP

Which is what people are all complaining about here. Look at the link you provided up-thread. Second page. It outlines that the data exists from multiple studies and they all come to the same conclusion. This does say that it's looking for a level of detail that wasn't previously available though...

It is a key data set, not some redundant and duplicitous bureaucratic waste of money.

301 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:07:57pm

re: #299 Racer X

He/she has awesome markings. Great photo. Your cat?

302 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:08:19pm

re: #295 Jimmah

How quickly outrage evolves, right in front of our eyes :

1) This data is suspect and needs to be re-assessed in detail!

2)Whaat? They are reassessing this data just to satisfy the demands of people like me? This is a shocking waste of money, and deeply fraudulent! Why, I simply won't stand for it!

Denial isn't just a Egyptian-themed technical death metal band from South Carolina. :D

303 A Man for all Seasons  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:08:37pm

re: #297 Taqyia2Me

Gotta give kudos to the administration for low profiling it during the shitstorm and announcing the resignation on a Friday evening.

If the White House was going to shit can me I'd leave on a Sunday morning when all the reporters are hung over...
I've got a plan

304 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:09:13pm

re: #295 Jimmah

How quickly outrage evolves, right in front of our eyes :

1) This data is suspect and needs to be re-assessed in detail!

2)Whaat? They are reassessing this data just to satisfy the demands of people like me? This is a shocking waste of money, and deeply fraudulent! Why, I simply won't stand for it!

Who was making point number 2 above? I believe it was... ?

305 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:09:31pm

re: #298 Obdicut

When you have nothing intelligent to say in reply, just call people names like 'denier' huh?

306 albusteve  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:09:37pm

re: #296 Decatur Deb

Tea Party wet dream:

[Link: www.niftyfiftyscifi.com...]

the Giant Paper Plate People!....WE MUS GET OWT OF EER!

307 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:10:34pm

re: #305 Bagua

That was a quote from Charles, Bagua, not my own words.

308 Decatur Deb  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:11:04pm

re: #306 albusteve

"Earth vs the Flying Saucers"--loved that movie.

309 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:11:05pm

re: #301 Obdicut

He/she has awesome markings. Great photo. Your cat?

No. I'm just suring around.

310 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:11:14pm

re: #307 Obdicut

That was a quote from Charles, Bagua, not my own words.

Why are you speaking for Charles and using his quotes? Are you the Deacon here?

311 Kragar  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:11:24pm

Reading comprehension is a dying art.

312 albusteve  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:11:35pm

re: #298 Obdicut

I think Charles said it best about you, Bagua.

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

I think it's apropos in this case, as well.

so why are you posting an old post?...just to dig at someone?...I'm glad few people do stuff like that

313 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:11:52pm

re: #311 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Reading comprehension is a dying art.

Spelling too.

314 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:12:41pm

re: #310 Bagua

I'm not speaking for Charles, Bagua. I'm quoting him. On his website. I'm quoting him because I agree with him, and I feel he put it pithily.

re: #312 albusteve

Because Bagua does the same dance every time. There's no reason to come up with anything new.

315 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:13:04pm

re: #183 Jimmah

Bill Donohue and others are raging out over this :

continued...

Do not go gentle into that godless night!
Rage, rage against the dying of the right!

316 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:14:11pm

re: #312 albusteve

so why are you posting an old post?...just to dig at someone?...I'm glad few people do stuff like that

More attack poodle behaviour. Nothing worse than sycophancy. Use out of context quotes to attack the unbeliever!

317 The Sanity Inspector  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:14:50pm

re: #250 Racer X

Synchronized disobedience is fun.


[Video]

:D My wife enjoyed that; she was once a teacher in Korea.

318 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:15:10pm

re: #315 iceweasel

One of the best poems of all time.

Here's an interesting retake on it:

And here's Rodney Dangerfield doing it.

319 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:15:40pm

re: #316 Bagua

Attack Poodle?

320 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:15:40pm

re: #314 Obdicut

Think for yourself Obdicut, you can do that. Charles has no problem thinking and speaking for himself and expressing his views.

321 ShaunP  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:15:51pm

re: #316 Bagua

More attack poodle behaviour. Nothing worse than sycophancy. Use out of context quotes to attack the unbeliever!


[Video]

For some reason, I found that hilarious... :)

322 Ziggy Standard  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:16:04pm

re: #304 Walter L. Newton

Who was making point number 2 above? I believe it was... ?

I'm assuming you can read, Walter. It's all here, in b&w.

323 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:16:21pm

re: #317 The Sanity Inspector

:D My wife enjoyed that; she was once a teacher in Korea.

I thought that was really cool. I am hesitant to show it to my 12 year old though.

324 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:16:59pm

re: #320 Bagua

I do think for myself, Bagua. I've expressed myself in my own words to you many times. But I think that Charles put it, as I said, very pithily. I also fail to see how quoting Charles on his own website is somehow being an 'attack poodle', though I do like the concept of an attack poodle.

Image: 39024652_13ad199f92.jpg

Comin at ya!

325 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:17:05pm

re: #319 Racer X

Attack Poodle?

Fearsome isn't it.

I believe, I believe, restrain your Attack Poodle!

326 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:18:14pm

Its the 'pick a fight with another poster when things aren't going your way' tactic!

If you don't like the message go after that, not the person that relayed it.

327 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:18:14pm

re: #322 Jimmah

I'm assuming you can read, Walter. It's all here, in b&w.

I know I never made that remark "2)Whaat? They are reassessing this data just to satisfy the demands of people like me? This is a shocking waste of money, and deeply fraudulent! Why, I simply won't stand for it!" So, I was wondering who did.

Sorry you can't help.

328 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:18:36pm

re: #326 windsagio

oops left out something @320 bagua

329 Ziggy Standard  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:19:38pm

re: #324 Obdicut

I do think for myself, Bagua. I've expressed myself in my own words to you many times. But I think that Charles put it, as I said, very pithily. I also fail to see how quoting Charles on his own website is somehow being an 'attack poodle', though I do like the concept of an attack poodle.

[Link: farm1.static.flickr.com...]

Comin at ya!

Also, resuming the 'unbeliever' meme at this point would seem to be a particularly weak way of trying to refute the applicability of Charles's post, to say the least.

330 albusteve  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:19:56pm

re: #324 Obdicut

I do think for myself, Bagua. I've expressed myself in my own words to you many times. But I think that Charles put it, as I said, very pithily. I also fail to see how quoting Charles on his own website is somehow being an 'attack poodle', though I do like the concept of an attack poodle.

[Link: farm1.static.flickr.com...]

Comin at ya!

it's needless that's what...you've dragged Charles into discussions before when he was off the thread....it's odd to me....it proves or demonstrates nothing more than any other opinion

331 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:20:00pm

re: #250 Racer X

That rules.

332 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:20:20pm

re: #324 Obdicut

Ok... I'm not fighting with you or making any particular comment about you, so, maybe you could simply discuss something with me... just you and I...

Do you find any problem with the British MET Office opening a new study into the 160 years worth of surface temperature data?

Just you and I.

333 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:21:39pm

re: #324 Obdicut

I do think for myself, Bagua. I've expressed myself in my own words to you many times. But I think that Charles put it, as I said, very pithily. I also fail to see how quoting Charles on his own website is somehow being an 'attack poodle', though I do like the concept of an attack poodle.

[Link: farm1.static.flickr.com...]

Comin at ya!

So raise some issues then. All you do is make little statements that prove your faith and heckle anyone who you fear is somehow challenging the true beliefs. You are constantly speaking for Charles and panicking when you see someone disagreeing with him. Are you running for the position of spokesman?

334 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:21:56pm

re: #326 windsagio

Its the 'pick a fight with another poster when things aren't going your way' tactic!

If you don't like the message go after that, not the person that relayed it.

Ah. Well, it's a common tactic here for people who disagree with Charles to attack individual posters who share Charles's view on the subject, rather than attack CJ directly.
So, for example, supposing someone just had his ass handed to him by Charles, you'll often see bitter snarling and snapping by that wingnut at random other posters.

335 Ziggy Standard  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:22:30pm

re: #327 Walter L. Newton

I know I never made that remark "2)Whaat? They are reassessing this data just to satisfy the demands of people like me? This is a shocking waste of money, and deeply fraudulent! Why, I simply won't stand for it!" So, I was wondering who did.

Sorry you can't help.

Just to put you out of your misery Walter - it wasn't you. It's actually pretty damn obvious who it was. Reading beats wondering every time, I think you'll find.

336 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:22:30pm

re: #334 iceweasel

Cowards!


/well to be honest I decided to snap at charles once, but I wimped out, so I can't talk >>

337 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:22:54pm

re: #332 Walter L. Newton

Given that scientists constantly refine data for accuracy, it hardly even seems worth mentioning.

I do think part of the reason it's being done is simply PR, and I do think they're mistaken, because deniers and their ilk will take any result and spin it. If there was no investigation, they'd cry out for one. When someone is chosen to head it, they'll scoff at his credentials-- but if he says anything they can misconstrue, he'll suddenly be a hero. It is very, very similar to the way that creationists attack Darwinism.

I don't find it surprising that data is being reviewed, since data is constantly reviewed. I'm also unsurprised that the usual people are trying to make hay out of it.

338 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:23:06pm

re: #336 windsagio

on the other hand, I didn't take it out on anyone else either >>

339 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:24:27pm

re: #336 windsagio

Cowards!

/well to be honest I decided to snap at charles once, but I wimped out, so I can't talk >>

Yeah, but it's totally possible to disagree with CJ and not snap at him, and not be a dick about your disagreement. I'm talking about the cowards. :p

340 albusteve  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:24:33pm

re: #334 iceweasel

Ah. Well, it's a common tactic here for people who disagree with Charles to attack individual posters who share Charles's view on the subject, rather than attack CJ directly.
So, for example, supposing someone just had his ass handed to him by Charles, you'll often see bitter snarling and snapping by that wingnut at random other posters.

my opinions are licensed...you cannot use them without paying a fee...just a friendly warning

341 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:24:37pm

re: #334 iceweasel

The real problem is people who phrase discussions in terms like "had his ass handed to him" and derogatory terms like "bitter snarling and snapping by that wingnut".

Trash talk from someone interested in personal combat, not discussion. Pathetic and typical dingbat behaviour.

342 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:24:46pm

re: #338 windsagio

on the other hand, I didn't take it out on anyone else either >>

Exactly. :)

343 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:25:01pm

re: #339 iceweasel

It was after one of the times he chewed everyone out for fighting. Thats simply not the time :P

344 ShaunP  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:25:01pm

re: #339 iceweasel

Yeah, but it's totally possible to disagree with CJ and not snap at him, and not be a dick about your disagreement. I'm talking about the cowards. :p

It's totally possible to disagree with anyone and not be a dick about it...

345 The Sanity Inspector  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:25:09pm

re: #269 webevintage

I amazed that I can still be shocked that people would mock a persons pain and suffering like this, but I am.

The mockery is wrong and despicable. But it is right for the people drafting the legislation to work with as broad and dispassionate a view as possible. It rarely happens, of course, especially when cameras are around. I remember the budget battles during the early Reagan years. The Dems brought a senior citizen lady to the floor, to announce that if those Republicans took away her social security check, she'd starve.

346 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:26:04pm

re: #341 Bagua

(title of video)

347 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:26:55pm

re: #344 ShaunP

The problem with that, is fighting is such a way to end the conversation!

With luck your opponent will get Pisst, and then everyone flees the yelling match.

re: #346 Obdicut

ok that was clever >>

348 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:28:07pm

re: #346 Obdicut

He, he. Good point, thanks.

349 BARACK THE VOTE  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:28:12pm

re: #346 Obdicut

[Video](title of video)

Bookmarked!

350 The Sanity Inspector  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:28:35pm

re: #323 Racer X

I thought that was really cool. I am hesitant to show it to my 12 year old though.

If she's 12, you're too late. They always know more than we think they know. :/

351 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:28:58pm

I'm not going to swallow hook line and sinker what anyone tells me on the internets. Especially when that something has potential to negatively impact Billions of people. I'd like to see exhausting studies that reveal outcomes, and more importantly, courses of action.

So yes, I remain skeptical on certain aspects of Global Warming. I am more skeptical today than I was just a week ago.

Not a denier. Skeptical.

352 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:29:56pm

re: #347 windsagio

The problem with that, is fighting is such a way to end the conversation!

With luck your opponent will get Pisst, and then everyone flees the yelling match.

re: #346 Obdicut

ok that was clever >>

That is just the intention, to shut down discussion and debate, make it personal and angry.

Personalize, Demonize and Marginalize.

Sensible people use logic and facts instead.

353 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:30:25pm

re: #352 Bagua

+ for (intentional?) irony ;)

354 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:30:28pm

re: #350 The Sanity Inspector

If she's 12, you're too late. They always know more than we think they know. :/

Tell me. I was checking her homework last night hoping she didn't notice I was scratching my head.

355 albusteve  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:31:40pm

re: #351 Racer X

I'm not going to swallow hook line and sinker what anyone tells me on the internets. Especially when that something has potential to negatively impact Billions of people. I'd like to see exhausting studies that reveal outcomes, and more importantly, courses of action.

So yes, I remain skeptical on certain aspects of Global Warming. I am more skeptical today than I was just a week ago.

Not a denier. Skeptical.

skeptics are evil!....there will be blood on your hands, and you are gonna burn in hell...skeptics are as bad or worse than deniers...I learned that last night

356 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:31:41pm

re: #354 Racer X

Heh. One of the things I'm working on at my job at the moment is a guidebook for parents to help them help their kids with their homework, even if they've forgotten trig and all that jazz.

I was amazed to discover how much I'd forgotten.

(which one is the dividend again?)

357 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:31:45pm

re: #353 windsagio

+ for (intentional?) irony ;)

Better run that by Cato first.

358 Ziggy Standard  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:32:25pm

People who, with no justification whatsoever, regularly make direct ad hominem attacks, calling fellow posters "psychos" just because they have lost an argument, should not attempt to give lectures on civil behaviour, citing such mild cases as "had his ass handed to him".

Unless it is their intention to come off as deeply dishonest and hypocritical and have people resolve never to engage them directly in discussion again of course.

359 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:32:28pm

re: #357 Bagua

heh, I"m not a purist. The loose interpretation of the word is more useful than the 150 year old definition :p

/Languages change, dammit!

360 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:32:53pm

re: #351 Racer X

The exhausting studies have already been done, sadly all pointing to the same conclusion. What is to be done is a far more interesting discussion, but it's hard to get there, because so many people are endlessly attacking the basic science itself.

It's a very weird nihilism.

361 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:33:00pm

re: #351 Racer X

I'm not going to swallow hook line and sinker what anyone tells me on the internets. Especially when that something has potential to negatively impact Billions of people. I'd like to see exhausting studies that reveal outcomes, and more importantly, courses of action.

So yes, I remain skeptical on certain aspects of Global Warming. I am more skeptical today than I was just a week ago.

Not a denier. Skeptical.

Dear me, you are not supporting evil child molesting torturing republican devils now are you?

362 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:34:15pm

re: #359 windsagio

heh, I"m not a purist. The loose interpretation of the word is more useful than the 150 year old definition :p

/Languages change, dammit!

Arrgh, that's the final straw, Cato will hear about this outrage!

363 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:35:28pm

re: #360 Obdicut

The exhausting studies have already been done, sadly all pointing to the same conclusion. What is to be done is a far more interesting discussion, but it's hard to get there, because so many people are endlessly attacking the basic science itself.

It's a very weird nihilism.

So the MET Office are nihilists now? Worn out by their research eh? Too bad they didn't keep notes or maintain data integrity.

364 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:35:33pm

re: #362 Bagua

(this is a better subject, I agree :p)

sure, bring it on. We can talk about the long s all night.

Also, 'prithee'.

365 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:35:39pm

re: #337 Obdicut

Given that scientists constantly refine data for accuracy, it hardly even seems worth mentioning.

I do think part of the reason it's being done is simply PR, and I do think they're mistaken, because deniers and their ilk will take any result and spin it. If there was no investigation, they'd cry out for one. When someone is chosen to head it, they'll scoff at his credentials-- but if he says anything they can misconstrue, he'll suddenly be a hero. It is very, very similar to the way that creationists attack Darwinism.

I don't find it surprising that data is being reviewed, since data is constantly reviewed. I'm also unsurprised that the usual people are trying to make hay out of it.

Good answer.

Although on the "it's being done is simply PR" I don't agree. If you read the MET overview of what and why it is going to do this review, it is much more than just proving or disproving something for the public relations of it all.

There is intent to standardize how scientific agencies collect surface temperature data, who they refine it, share it, process it, all sorts of positive steps to better the science of climate change.

It is far from just a review of the 160 years worth of temperature data. If you read the press release, you will see the complexity of what they want to accomplish.

Anyone interested in good science can only wish the MET the best in this endeavor... it's a very good step forward.

[Link: www.foxnews.com...]

366 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:37:07pm

re: #364 windsagio

Yes, language is a fun subject. You're not one of those grammar deniers are you?

367 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:37:10pm

re: #351 Racer X

I'm not going to swallow hook line and sinker what anyone tells me on the internets. Especially when that something has potential to negatively impact Billions of people. I'd like to see exhausting studies that reveal outcomes, and more importantly, courses of action.

So yes, I remain skeptical on certain aspects of Global Warming. I am more skeptical today than I was just a week ago.

Not a denier. Skeptical.

Having a healthy level of skepticism is good for your intellect. Still, there is a point where skepticism exceeds healthy levels, and becomes something more like burying your head in the sand. Here is an interesting take on that phenomena, kind of in the style of Aesop's Fables.

368 The Sanity Inspector  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:37:34pm

He who walks through a great city to find subjects for weeping, may, God knows, find plenty at every corner to wring his heart; but let such a man walk on his course, and enjoy his grief alone — we are not of those who would accompany him. The miseries of us poor earthdwellers gain no alleviation from the sympathy of those who merely hunt them out to be pathetic over them. The weeping philosopher too often impairs his eyesight by his woe, and becomes unable from his tears to see the remedies for the evils which he deplores. Thus it will often be found that the man of no tears is the truest philanthropist, as he is the best physician who wears a cheerful face, even in the worst of cases.
-- Charles Mackay, Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, 1841

369 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:38:35pm

re: #365 Walter L. Newton

Again, there's nothing new in scientists pushing for better data collection and analysis methods. They do this all the time. It's probably going on elsewhere right now as well, without any mention. This is just standardization. There's nothing very unique or special about it.

But it will be taken up and waved by those 'concerned' as if it's oh-so-very important.

370 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:38:44pm

re: #365 Walter L. Newton

Good answer.

Although on the "it's being done is simply PR" I don't agree. If you read the MET overview of what and why it is going to do this review, it is much more than just proving or disproving something for the public relations of it all.

There is intent to standardize how scientific agencies collect surface temperature data, who they refine it, share it, process it, all sorts of positive steps to better the science of climate change.

It is far from just a review of the 160 years worth of temperature data. If you read the press release, you will see the complexity of what they want to accomplish.

Anyone interested in good science can only wish the MET the best in this endeavor... it's a very good step forward.

[Link: www.foxnews.com...]

Yes, very complex. And all for public relations.

371 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:39:09pm

re: #365 Walter L. Newton

I cetainly think its fair to say that this, like the CRU review aren't being done for scientific reasons, but rather for political reasons.

372 ShaunP  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:39:22pm

re: #367 Slumbering Behemoth

Having a healthy level of skepticism is good for your intellect. Still, there is a point where skepticism exceeds healthy levels, and becomes something more like burying your head in the sand. Here is an interesting take on that phenomena, kind of in the style of Aesop's Fables.

Was that the link you meant to post? If so, LOL!!!

373 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:39:44pm

re: #367 Slumbering Behemoth

You are a beautiful man.

Assuming that's what you meant to post.

374 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:39:52pm

re: #366 Bagua

I"m a grammar modernist, slightly different.

Are you a language change denier? :p

375 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:40:15pm

re: #360 Obdicut

The exhausting studies have already been done, sadly all pointing to the same conclusion. What is to be done is a far more interesting discussion, but it's hard to get there, because so many people are endlessly attacking the basic science itself.

It's a very weird nihilism.

Well, thats the thing innit? All the conclusions I have seen proposed so far lead to Humans being fucked. Badly. It is not good at all.

We are nowhere near coming up with a good proposal on what needs to be done. What is needed is a massive and immediate abandonment of the burning of all fossil fuels by all humans - not just us evil Americans.

I do not see that happening.

376 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:40:33pm

re: #370 Charles

Yes, very complex. And all for public relations.

If so, and you may be right, then this is a massive scandal and should be investigated. If the MET Office has become corrupted by politics then this should be exposed.

377 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:41:50pm

re: #374 windsagio

I"m a grammar modernist, slightly different.

Are you a language change denier? :p

Let's just say a 'language change sceptic' shall we?

378 ShaunP  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:42:22pm

re: #376 Bagua

If so, and you may be right, then this is a massive scandal and should be investigated. If the MET Office has become corrupted by politics then this should be exposed.

Somehow, I feel like all roads in this argument lead to "the MET office is corrupted by politics and all of their science is questionable"...

379 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:42:47pm

re: #375 Racer X

What is needed is a massive and immediate abandonment of the burning of all fossil fuels by all humans - not just us evil Americans.

But this isn't true. While that would be in some ways ideal, we can do a hell of a lot by simply slowing the immense amount of use of fossil fuels by all humans. We can develop carbon capture technology. We can adjust all of our own lifestyles in small amounts. We can export green tech to the developing world at low cost, just as we did for CFCs.

We're humans. We kick ass. We'd kick a lot more ass if the anti-science brigade weren't chewing on humanity's collective leg like a demented toothless bulldog.

380 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:43:39pm

re: #372 ShaunP

re: #373 Obdicut

Okay, new rule: When I or RacerX prank each other with absurd videos, please do keep it under your hats until the victim of the prank has a chance to get "Rick Roll'd" as it were.

381 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:43:42pm

re: #367 Slumbering Behemoth

Heh.

You got me again. I will soon post a retort.

382 Randall Gross  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:43:53pm

For the record Bags and Walter, all the invective and ad hom aside, the snark and bitters extinguished on both sides, you've failed to convince me in this long long long multi thread discussion. Thanks however for the effort.

Now
M O O N .... that spells moon!

383 ShaunP  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:44:28pm

re: #380 Slumbering Behemoth

re: #373 Obdicut

Okay, new rule: When I or RacerX prank each other with absurd videos, please do keep it under your hats until the victim of the prank has a chance to get "Rick Roll'd" as it were.

Now I know... Awesome! :D

384 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:44:31pm

re: #379 Obdicut

Thats really the key, if we can't do big things, do small things.

We have to at least try.

385 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:44:37pm

re: #370 Charles

Yes, very complex. And all for public relations.

re: #371 windsagio

I cetainly think its fair to say that this, like the CRU review aren't being done for scientific reasons, but rather for political reasons.

Amazing. Now it's all for PR and politics. Well, let's assume that's the only reason. It ain't going to harm the science one bit.

386 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:45:11pm

re: #380 Slumbering Behemoth

I'm sorry, dude, I didn't know. But that is so much better than a rick roll. Rickrolling is for chumps; y'all are on a different plane.

My favorite version of the rick roll is this:

387 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:45:31pm

re: #382 Thanos

For the record Bags and Walter, all the invective and ad hom aside, the snark and bitters extinguished on both sides, you've failed to convince me in this long long long multi thread discussion. Thanks however for the effort.

Now
M O O N ... that spells moon!

What! You're not convince what the MET office is proposing is not good for climate change science?

[Link: www.foxnews.com...]

388 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:45:53pm

When you least expect it.

389 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:46:53pm

re: #385 Walter L. Newton

Because Politics and PR have absolutely nothing to do with each other. Right.

390 ShaunP  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:46:57pm

re: #386 Obdicut

I'm sorry, dude, I didn't know. But that is so much better than a rick roll. Rickrolling is for chumps; y'all are on a different plane.

Seriously. I sat through a minute of that video trying to figure out which fable that related to...

391 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:47:56pm

re: #389 windsagio

Because Politics and PR have absolutely nothing to do with each other. Right.

Of course they do. Now, did you read the MET proposal I linked to? If you read it, are you telling me they are doing it ONLY for PR and politics?

392 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:48:16pm

re: #383 ShaunP

It's something we do to amuse ourselves. Racer sort of started it, and we've been going back and forth for a while. Lately, he has been totally wiping the floor with me at it, beating me to deploying vids that I have bookmarked for "just that right time".

393 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:48:31pm

re: #378 ShaunP

Somehow, I feel like all roads in this argument lead to "the MET office is corrupted by politics and all of their science is questionable"...

Not from me, I welcome their raising their game and developing a Temp-set that is peer reviewable, open, robust, repeatable and able to be replicated and confirmed by indispensable researchers. With data sets that are documented, verifiable and accurate. The polar opposite of what the CRU produced.

394 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:48:58pm

re: #391 Walter L. Newton

Not a big fan of absolutism, so let me turn it around. Do you think PR/Politics (or trying to appease the deniers) had nothing to do with it?

395 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:50:32pm

re: #388 Racer X

When you least expect it.

I wouldn't have it any other way. Until next we meet on the battlefield of the absurd, bro.

396 ShaunP  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:50:44pm

re: #393 Bagua

Not from me, I welcome their raising their game and developing a Temp-set that is peer reviewable, open, robust, repeatable and able to be replicated and confirmed by indispensable researchers. With data sets that are documented, verifiable and accurate. The polar opposite of what the CRU produced.

I wasn't referring to the research, I was referring to the line of questioning.

I actually agree with both lines of thinking. It's possible that something extraneous is being done, that wouldn't otherwise be done, but the end result will advance the science...

397 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:51:14pm

re: #382 Thanos

What is your position then? Is the MET Office wasting money and resources? Do you consider the CRU work accurate, even though it is impossible to duplicate and confirm?

398 goddamnedfrank  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:51:24pm

re: #316 Bagua

More attack poodle behaviour.

Okay people, here's the hot tip on using GIS for witty reparté, quite often what you're really looking for is not on the first page. Also, while one often doesn't know what they're looking for going in, you'll know it when you see it.

I hope this tutorial has been helpful to you.

399 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:52:22pm

re: #398 goddamnedfrank

Three thumbs up!

400 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:52:32pm

re: #398 goddamnedfrank

I could totally take that poodle.

401 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:52:50pm

re: #394 windsagio

Not a big fan of absolutism, so let me turn it around. Do you think PR/Politics (or trying to appease the deniers) had nothing to do with it?

Of course they have something to do with just about everything. But a lot of the chatter up thread is that this is the ONLY reason the MET is doing it and it serves no scientific purpose.

What part of these proposals do you think is bad for the science?

From the Fox News article:

“verifiable datasets starting from a common databank of unrestricted data”

“methods that are fully documented in the peer reviewed literature and open to scrutiny;”

“a set of independent assessments of surface temperature produced by independent groups using independent methods,”

“comprehensive audit trails to deliver confidence in the results;”
“robust assessment of uncertainties associated with observational error, temporal and geographical in homogeneities.”

And I do deal with absolutes in some cases. You absolutely cannot discuss this topic about the MET review proposal if you haven't read the proposal. Did you read the proposal.

402 prairiefire  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:53:19pm

re: #354 Racer X

Thank goodness for my smart, math guy husband. I would be shelling out money for a tutor for my gal by now.

403 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:53:56pm

re: #400 Obdicut

I could totally take that poodle.

I dunno Obdicut, he looks fierce with that mohawk. Don't get overconfident.

404 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:53:56pm

re: #401 Walter L. Newton

What are the implications of the disclosures for the integrity of scientific research?

1. The UK enjoys a reputation for strong and robust science on the international stage. In the field of climate research the Met Office is widely acknowledged as world leading.

2. Whilst it would be arrogant to assume that any system or process is perfect, the codes and processes in place to govern science research across the UK, laid down by the Government Office for Science, the UK Research Integrity Office and Research Councils UK, form a comprehensive framework within which science research is produced and debated. In addition, the Met Office also adheres fully to the Civil Service Code and operates to the highest standards of integrity and transparency.

3. All published science is subjected to a rigorous process of peer review: a well-established method by which scientific evidence and claims, and importantly the methodology behind these, are scrutinised by qualified experts in the field. Peer review also promotes and maintains open debate across the science community - crucial to further developments in science.

4. Transparency and integrity are vital components in maintaining the Met Office's, and the UK's, position at the leading edge in climate science and we have wherever possible, but dependant on IPR ownership, released the underlying land temperature component used in the HadCRUT analysis. The Met Office's sea temperature component has been widely available for some time.

How independent are the other two international data sets?

5. There is strong evidence that the globe has warmed. Three independent global temperature data sets, HadCRUT, NCDC and NASA-GISS, all clearly demonstrate the rise in global temperatures over the last 150 years. Despite the large differences in the methods used to estimate global temperature trends, these blended analyses are consistent in their view of global temperature change.

6. There are numerous studies in the peer-reviewed literature that attest to the robustness of the surface temperature records, their independence and their non-reliance on specific individual station records. Support for the reality of surface trends also comes from reanalyses and changes in ocean heat content, glaciers, humidity and a host of other indicators including phenological data. Indicators from meteorological, oceanographic and physical measurements are strongly consistent with the surface temperature records discussed above.

7. The data come from numerous different technologies and have been investigated by numerous independent groups. Where multiple datasets exist for a given parameter none fundamentally disagrees with the expected signal for a warming world. For the surface records to be wrong would require all these other analyses to be similarly wrong.

8. Annex A provides a detailed explanation of the differences between the analyses with respect to data sourcing and methodology.

405 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:54:08pm

re: #401 Walter L. Newton

I'd go so far as to say the primary causes were Political. They were probably able to find some scientific justification for it, but that wasn't what got the wheel rolling.

Its clear to everyone but you that that's the case (oh and Bagua).

406 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:54:56pm

re: #386 Obdicut

I'm sorry, dude, I didn't know. But that is so much better than a rick roll. Rickrolling is for chumps; y'all are on a different plane.

RacerX set the bar pretty high when he started the whole thing with this video.

407 prairiefire  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:55:46pm

re: #406 Slumbering Behemoth

I remember that! I love that shiny gal.

408 ShaunP  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:56:39pm

re: #406 Slumbering Behemoth

RacerX set the bar pretty high when he started the whole thing with this video.

LMAO!!!

409 prairiefire  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:56:42pm

Here's her MySpave page:[Link: www.myspace.com...]

410 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:56:45pm

re: #379 Obdicut

But this isn't true. While that would be in some ways ideal, we can do a hell of a lot by simply slowing the immense amount of use of fossil fuels by all humans. We can develop carbon capture technology. We can adjust all of our own lifestyles in small amounts. We can export green tech to the developing world at low cost, just as we did for CFCs.

We're humans. We kick ass. We'd kick a lot more ass if the anti-science brigade weren't chewing on humanity's collective leg like a demented toothless bulldog.

There was a time in America about 25 years ago that you could walk into a Honda showroom and buy a car that only weighed 1700 lbs and got 54mpg. That technology is as old as I am! So Imagine a fuel-efficient, clean diesel or hybrid commuter vehicle that only really needs to develop about 70 hp. Imagine the mileage of a Volt style powertrain that only needs a three-cyl diesel to power the electric motor, regenerative braking, the whole deal.

411 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:57:07pm

re: #406 Slumbering Behemoth

That's cool! I think I've seen that chick in another video. Oh yeah, here it is:

412 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:57:34pm

re: #405 windsagio

I'd go so far as to say the primary causes were Political. They were probably able to find some scientific justification for it, but that wasn't what got the wheel rolling.

Its clear to everyone but you that that's the case (oh and Bagua).

Ha! You are accusing the MET Office of politics. Are you a closet 'denier' making such a smear?

413 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:57:38pm

re: #405 windsagio

I'd go so far as to say the primary causes were Political. They were probably able to find some scientific justification for it, but that wasn't what got the wheel rolling.

Its clear to everyone but you that that's the case (oh and Bagua).

No... I agree that they were under a lot of pressure, political and simply public, to make some statements, or to make some decisions, or to examine the issues in some way.

I was only debating with the concept that PR and Politics was the only reason they are doing it.

I don't think so.

And the review proposal that the MET has crafted cannot be anything but good for science.

This is good...

"The current surface temperature datasets were first put together in the 1980s to the best standards of dataset development at that time; they are independent analyses and give the same results, thereby corroborating each other.

In the case of the CRU land surface temperature dataset (CRUTEMP3, which forms the land component of the HADCRUT dataset) there are substantial IPR issues around the raw station data that underpin the dataset: we are actively pursuing resolution of these issues so that the base data can be made openly available. We know that several stations have already been explicitly forbidden from release by the rights’ holders so we will not be able to release all the under-pinning station data.

Consequently we have been considering how the dataset can be brought up to modern standards and made fit for the purpose of addressing 21st Century needs. We feel that it is timely to propose an international effort to reanalyze surface temperature data in collaboration with the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), which has the responsiblity for global observing and monitoring systems for weather and climate."

414 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:59:18pm

re: #410 Windupbird

There was a time in America about 25 years ago that you could walk into a Honda showroom and buy a car that only weighed 1700 lbs and got 54mpg. That technology is as old as I am! So Imagine a fuel-efficient, clean diesel or hybrid commuter vehicle that only really needs to develop about 70 hp. Imagine the mileage of a Volt style powertrain that only needs a three-cyl diesel to power the electric motor, regenerative braking, the whole deal.

Safety and pollution control rules have put the kibosh on that idea.

415 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:59:22pm

re: #412 Bagua

Cute :p At least you're having fun with it ;)

416 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:59:45pm

re: #414 Bagua

Our current safety ratings are retarded btw. (Just my own opinion, natch)

417 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 6:59:52pm

re: #411 Obdicut

Nice try, but too easy. I am always on high alert just after deploying an attack.

418 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:00:33pm

re: #417 Slumbering Behemoth

It was more for you to stick in your quiver. I figured I was being obvious as shit. Now that I know, though I will get you. Unless I completely forget who I'm supposed to do it to, and do it to someone completely fucking random. Which is likely.

419 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:00:51pm

re: #404 Obdicut

What are the implications of the disclosures for the integrity of scientific research?

1. The UK enjoys a reputation for strong and robust science on the international stage. In the field of climate research the Met Office is widely acknowledged as world leading.

2. Whilst it would be arrogant to assume that any system or process is perfect, the codes and processes in place to govern science research across the UK, laid down by the Government Office for Science, the UK Research Integrity Office and Research Councils UK, form a comprehensive framework within which science research is produced and debated. In addition, the Met Office also adheres fully to the Civil Service Code and operates to the highest standards of integrity and transparency.

3. All published science is subjected to a rigorous process of peer review: a well-established method by which scientific evidence and claims, and importantly the methodology behind these, are scrutinised by qualified experts in the field. Peer review also promotes and maintains open debate across the science community - crucial to further developments in science.

4. Transparency and integrity are vital components in maintaining the Met Office's, and the UK's, position at the leading edge in climate science and we have wherever possible, but dependant on IPR ownership, released the underlying land temperature component used in the HadCRUT analysis. The Met Office's sea temperature component has been widely available for some time.

How independent are the other two international data sets?

5. There is strong evidence that the globe has warmed. Three independent global temperature data sets, HadCRUT, NCDC and NASA-GISS, all clearly demonstrate the rise in global temperatures over the last 150 years. Despite the large differences in the methods used to estimate global temperature trends, these blended analyses are consistent in their view of global temperature change.

6. There are numerous studies in the peer-reviewed literature that attest to the robustness of the surface temperature records, their independence and their non-reliance on specific individual station records. Support for the reality of surface trends also comes from reanalyses and changes in ocean heat content, glaciers, humidity and a host of other indicators including phenological data. Indicators from meteorological, oceanographic and physical measurements are strongly consistent with the surface temperature records discussed above.

7. The data come from numerous different technologies and have been investigated by numerous independent groups. Where multiple datasets exist for a given parameter none fundamentally disagrees with the expected signal for a warming world. For the surface records to be wrong would require all these other analyses to be similarly wrong.

8. Annex A provides a detailed explanation of the differences between the analyses with respect to data sourcing and methodology.

Where did you clip and paste this from? And the MET proposal for this review cannot have anything but positive implications for the integrity of scientific research?

What they are proposing is scientific research.

420 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:01:48pm

re: #406 Slumbering Behemoth

RacerX set the bar pretty high when he started the whole thing with this video.

Damn, RacerX. Looking at the date of that video, I recall you linked it when it was relatively new. That would mean that we have been locked in goofy combat for more than two years now.

Good times.

421 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:01:52pm

re: #393 Bagua

Not from me, I welcome their raising their game and developing a Temp-set that is peer reviewable, open, robust, repeatable and able to be replicated and confirmed by indispensable researchers. With data sets that are documented, verifiable and accurate. The polar opposite of what the CRU produced.

What's gonna happen when they get done and it looks basically the same? Do we relax, or do we seize upon any slightest deviance from the initial results, and become hysterical demanding a third round?

422 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:03:06pm

re: #415 windsagio

Cute :p At least you're having fun with it ;)

Why not have fun? Aren't we here for fun and conversation?

423 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:03:31pm

re: #419 Walter L. Newton

It is unsurprising that the MET is proposing scientific research, given that that's what the MET does. And that came from here:

[Link: www.publications.parliament.uk...]

424 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:03:33pm

re: #413 Walter L. Newton

Theres really no point to this, since you're just not willing (for whatever reason) to look at it honestly. You get the last word if you want it :)

(or if you want to leave it to me, thanks!)

425 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:03:46pm

re: #422 Bagua

Only sometimes, only sometimes :p

426 Walter L. Newton  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:04:42pm

re: #421 SanFranciscoZionist

What's gonna happen when they get done and it looks basically the same? Do we relax, or do we seize upon any slightest deviance from the initial results, and become hysterical demanding a third round?

Part of the proposal is to find processes that will advance the whole science of climate research, not to harm it. Of course, they will be some people who will run with anything to deny the science, but you can't stop scientific advancement in fear of your detractors. This list is some of the tasks that the MET office would like to accomplish in the next three years...


“verifiable datasets starting from a common databank of unrestricted data”

“methods that are fully documented in the peer reviewed literature and open to scrutiny;”

“a set of independent assessments of surface temperature produced by independent groups using independent methods,”

“comprehensive audit trails to deliver confidence in the results;”

“robust assessment of uncertainties associated with observational error, temporal and geographical in homogeneities.”

I'm really not sure why there is so much push back about this proposal.

427 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:04:52pm

re: #418 Obdicut

My only recommendation, if I may, is that you keep it clean and lighthearted. Nothing ruins the element of surprise like having to add a NSFW warning.

428 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:05:19pm

re: #427 Slumbering Behemoth

Such warnings are for pussies!

429 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:05:38pm

re: #427 Slumbering Behemoth

Do you think the baby one is over the line? To me, it's so clinical it's barely anything, but others have different reactions, I know.

430 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:08:28pm

re: #414 Bagua

Safety and pollution control rules have put the kibosh on that idea.

Safety yes, but not pollution. A 2005 diesel Jetta TDI develops pretty fantastic mileage (north of 40 IIRC), and it's pulling 3200 pounds of weight, seats five confortably, and has no hybrid powertrain. You could EASILY get a 1700 pound car north of 100mpg. Maybe 150mpg.

The safety rules have to change, though. There's a reason subcompacts and so-called sports-cars weigh what station wagons did in the 80s, and it's all the heavy and dense safety quipment, sound insulation, interiors, all that stuff. Something has to give, if we want truly efficient cars, we're going to have to give up some stuff.

431 prairiefire  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:08:34pm

re: #429 Obdicut

Not over the line, IMO, but it did make me shudder.

432 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:08:37pm

re: #428 windsagio

SOP here. NSFW warnings are used out of respect for all participating Lizards and our host.

re: #429 Obdicut

Do you think the baby one is over the line?

Oh no, not in the least. I was just offering that as a general suggestion.

433 Obdicut  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:09:20pm

re: #432 Slumbering Behemoth

Okay. I'm not generally a NSFW kind of guy. I'm even wearing pants.

Best of luck in your battle, soldier. I'm out.

434 windsagio  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:10:53pm

re: #432 Slumbering Behemoth

pff killjoy :p

435 Racer X  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:13:54pm

re: #420 Slumbering Behemoth

Damn, RacerX. Looking at the date of that video, I recall you linked it when it was relatively new. That would mean that we have been locked in goofy combat for more than two years now.

Good times.

Indeed!

I look forward to your links.

436 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:15:15pm

re: #421 SanFranciscoZionist

What's gonna happen when they get done and it looks basically the same? Do we relax, or do we seize upon any slightest deviance from the initial results, and become hysterical demanding a third round?

Read through the MET proposal, their goals are clear. This will be a big change over the secretive Temp sets issued by the CRU under Phil Jones.

This will provide.

1. Verifiable datasets starting from a common databank of unrestricted data at both monthly and finer temporal resolutions (daily and perhaps even sub-daily)

2. Methods that are fully documented in the peer reviewed literature open to scrutiny.

3. A set of independent assessments of surface temperature produced by independent methods.

4. Robust benchmarking of performance and comprehensive audit trails to deliver confidence in the results;

5. Robust assessment of uncertainties associated with observational error, temporal geographical homogeneities.

All of which is absent in the current work done by the secretive CRU which was not only not available, but actively guarded against FOI requests. Now we discover there is no audit trail either.

You believe it will have the same result? Based upon what, faith?

What they are doing now is what should have been done in the first place, following proper scientific procedures and documenting their work in a manner that allows it to be examined and replicated. Up until now they have been like the Vatican, issuing proclamations and refusing scrutiny.

What the MET Office is doing is mandating that 'Climate Science' must be based upon open, verifiable data and putting to bed all the secrecy and anti-science faith based conduct that has sullied this field and raised so many questions.

437 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:17:50pm

re: #436 Bagua

Congrats on relentlessly sticking to the talking points despite being shown that you're distorting the MET's statements. Marks for persistence.

438 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:18:52pm

re: #430 Windupbird

Safety yes, but not pollution. A 2005 diesel Jetta TDI develops pretty fantastic mileage (north of 40 IIRC), and it's pulling 3200 pounds of weight, seats five confortably, and has no hybrid powertrain. You could EASILY get a 1700 pound car north of 100mpg. Maybe 150mpg.

The safety rules have to change, though. There's a reason subcompacts and so-called sports-cars weigh what station wagons did in the 80s, and it's all the heavy and dense safety quipment, sound insulation, interiors, all that stuff. Something has to give, if we want truly efficient cars, we're going to have to give up some stuff.

Agreed. Though the pollution controls certainly add to the cost and reduce the mileage, they are less of an influence than the safety items. In my view, the safety is worth the extra costs. But we will test my opinion when oil spikes over $150 /bbl again.

439 Bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:20:03pm

re: #437 Charles

Congrats on relentlessly sticking to the talking points despite being shown that you're distorting the MET's statements. Marks for persistence.

Thank you! But in what way am I "distorting the MET's statements"? I am quoting from them verbatim.

440 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:23:56pm

re: #438 Bagua

Agreed. Though the pollution controls certainly add to the cost and reduce the mileage, they are less of an influence than the safety items. In my view, the safety is worth the extra costs. But we will test my opinion when oil spikes over $150 /bbl again.

Certainly, I like my 8 airbags in my GTI. But if we're really to lower our dependence on dino juice and reduce pollution, something's gotta give.

(I also have an ulterior motive: light cars are more fun to drive)

441 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:24:36pm

re: #435 Racer X

Same here Racer. You are a most worthy adversary.

442 bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:25:12pm

re: #440 Windupbird

Certainly, I like my 8 airbags in my GTI. But if we're really to lower our dependence on dino juice and reduce pollution, something's gotta give.

(I also have an ulterior motive: light cars are more fun to drive)

You are correct that the choice is very stark, safety or fuel efficiency.

443 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:25:56pm

re: #439 Bagua

Thank you! But in what way am I "distorting the MET's statements"? I am quoting from them verbatim.

You're doing your best to insinuate that this review is happening because the data is suspect. You're wrong. The data is not suspect, and the MET Office makes it very clear in the article you're trying to distort:

The Met Office stresses that it does not foresee that the new analyses will reveal any "substantial changes" from the basic conclusion in the last IPCC report, published in 2007, that the recent warming of the earth's climate is "unequivocal." Rather, it explains in its proposal document: "This effort will ensure that the datasets are completely robust and that all methods are transparent."

444 bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:29:27pm

re: #443 Charles

Well we disagree then. But I have yet to hear anyone else assert that the MET Office is doing this massive, ground up re-do because they believe the data is not suspect. That is illogical.

445 jaunte  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:30:26pm

re: #444 bagua

They did say:
"It is important to emphasize that we do not anticipate any substantial changes in the resulting global and continental-scale multi-decadal trends. This effort will ensure that the datasets are completely robust and that all methods are transparent."

446 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:31:25pm

re: #444 bagua

Well we disagree then. But I have yet to hear anyone else assert that the MET Office is doing this massive, ground up re-do because they believe the data is not suspect. That is illogical.

And somehow you just keep ignoring the obvious -- that the review is happening because of the overblown scandal, for public relations reasons. Go ahead and keep trying to spin it -- I think most people can see what you're doing, despite the MET's own statements.

447 bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:31:56pm

re: #445 jaunte

They did say:
"It is important to emphasize that we do not anticipate any substantial changes in the resulting global and continental-scale multi-decadal trends. This effort will ensure that the datasets are completely robust and that all methods are transparent."

It is good that they have a positive outlook and remain on message, they are very consistent with that sort of approach.

448 goddamnedfrank  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:33:34pm

re: #436 Bagua

re: #436 Bagua

You believe it will have the same result? Based upon what, faith?

A little faith, some data analysis, a pinch bit of marijuana (optional) and lobster with drawn garlic butter. You know, the "must haves."

449 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:38:57pm

re: #444 bagua

Well we disagree then. But I have yet to hear anyone else assert that the MET Office is doing this massive, ground up re-do because they believe the data is not suspect. That is illogical.

So uh, no organization ever bows to political pressure?

450 bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:39:07pm

re: #446 Charles

And somehow you just keep ignoring the obvious -- that the review is happening because of the overblown scandal, for public relations reasons. Go ahead and keep trying to spin it -- I think most people can see what you're doing, despite the MET's own statements.

Let's suppose you are correct and they are only doing this "for public relations reasons", and lord knows, hundreds of millions are spent putting forth the AGW 'message'.

Ok fine, political then, the end result will be a verifiable, open source data-set that will end all the complaints over secrecy and data manipulation and sloppy record keeping. If the result is the same, or different, it will still greatly raise the standards of science at the MET Office and remove the questions and suspicions swirling around the CRU temperature sets.

Surely this will be a plus for the science. Call it political, whatever, the important thing is it will erase widespread doubts about the value and accuracy of this key data set. To me it looks like science, but even if it is political, the end result will improve the science.

451 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:43:45pm

re: #426 Walter L. Newton

Part of the proposal is to find processes that will advance the whole science of climate research, not to harm it. Of course, they will be some people who will run with anything to deny the science, but you can't stop scientific advancement in fear of your detractors. This list is some of the tasks that the MET office would like to accomplish in the next three years...

“verifiable datasets starting from a common databank of unrestricted data”

“methods that are fully documented in the peer reviewed literature and open to scrutiny;”

“a set of independent assessments of surface temperature produced by independent groups using independent methods,”

“comprehensive audit trails to deliver confidence in the results;”

“robust assessment of uncertainties associated with observational error, temporal and geographical in homogeneities.”

I'm really not sure why there is so much push back about this proposal.

I'm not pushing back, for one. But I am distrustful of this whole conversation, here, on this forum.

452 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:44:16pm

re: #450 bagua

The science is fine right now, and has already gone through exhaustive review and analysis. The MET's analysis is going to improve nothing -- it will simply give the denial industry more excuses to complain, no matter what it concludes.

453 SanFranciscoZionist  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:45:19pm

re: #436 Bagua

You believe it will have the same result? Based upon what, faith?

Not exactly. Based upon past experience, I believe that if it does have the same result, the beat will go on regardless.

454 bagua  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:46:39pm

re: #449 WindUpBird

So uh, no organization ever bows to political pressure?

For the MET Office, which receives hundreds of millions in public money for research, to conduct a major scientific study for purely political reasons, would be a massive scandal.

The problem with AGW these days is not the science at all, it is the politicisation of science, the secrecy and the need to label sceptics as 'deniers' and fiercely guard data and research as though it were some trade secret.

The CRU is getting universally criticised for this, including by very pro-AGW sources such as the Guardian's Fred Pearce.

455 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:48:38pm

re: #454 bagua

For the MET Office, which receives hundreds of millions in public money for research, to conduct a major scientific study for purely political reasons, would be a massive scandal.

The problem with AGW these days is not the science at all, it is the politicisation of science, the secrecy and the need to label sceptics as 'deniers' and fiercely guard data and research as though it were some trade secret.

The CRU is getting universally criticised for this, including by very pro-AGW sources such as the Guardian's Fred Pearce.

The MET Office explicitly said they do not expect to find anything wrong with the data. They're not doing this because there are problems. They're doing it because people like you are doing your best to mislead gullible people, and they need to fight back against this campaign of dishonesty in the public relations world.

456 Randall Gross  Fri, Feb 26, 2010 7:59:46pm

Bagua: My position is that you will always be scroll over henceforward since you endlessly repeat yourself even when soundly refuted.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
3 weeks ago
Views: 365 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1