Overnight Open Thread
To thine own self be true.
— William Shakespeare, Polonius in “Hamlet”
To thine own self be true.
— William Shakespeare, Polonius in “Hamlet”
2 | freetoken Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:23:19pm |
To thineown selffavorite talk show host be true.
-Modern American Conservative
3 | Fenway_Nation Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:26:07pm |
Good baseball weekend.
Football…not so much. It’s still early, so I might as well pretend today’s loss to the Jets or yesterday’s BC loss to Clemson never happened.
4 | Silvergirl Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:31:42pm |
This above all: to thine own self be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man.
6 | Gus Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:32:56pm |
7 | freetoken Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:34:14pm |
re: #6 Gus 802
Wish I could give you more than one up-ding.
8 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:34:48pm |
re: #3 Fenway_Nation
Good baseball weekend.
Football…not so much. It’s still early, so I might as well pretend today’s loss to the Jets or yesterday’s BC loss to Clemson never happened.
Great football weekend, terrible baseball weekend.
9 | Gus Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:35:32pm |
10 | Fenway_Nation Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:36:46pm |
re: #8 TheMatrix31
Well…Army actually won this weekend.
/wonders if they’ll be bowl-eligible this year.
11 | traderjoe9 Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:38:45pm |
Fenway…here’s the Giants season in a nutshell.
I spent Monday night in AT&T Park, watching the Giants do something they seem to have forgotten is actually legal:
Cross home plate more than twice.
Yessir, the Giants scored nine runs Monday — nine — for the first time in any home game since July 9, for just the sixth time in a home game all season and for only the second time in any of Tim Lincecum’s last 45 starts. They even had two innings of three runs or more Monday. Before that, they’d had four all month — in 106 innings.
But now here’s what’s really interesting:
As regular readers of this blog know, from time to time this month, Three Strikes will be looking in on September’s hidden dramas — the quest for historic feats that don’t quite rank up there with Derek Jeter’s pursuit of Lou Gehrig. And the Giants are on the road to an all-timer:
They currently rank dead last in the major leagues — that’s No. 30 out of 30 teams — in on-base percentage. Their OBP of .308 is more than 50 points lower than the Yankees’ OBP (.362) — and even 35 points lower than the Nationals’ (.343).
Yet this team could still make it to the postseason. And that, friends, would be a truly historic development.
Just to put that .308 OBP in some recent perspective, if that number holds, it would be the fifth lowest, over a whole season, of any team in either league since the “age of offense” kicked in back in 1993. Three of the four teams to beat it — the 2002 Tigers, 2003 Tigers and 1993 Mets — lost 106, 119 and 103 games, respectively.
But this team could make the postseason. And even if it doesn’t, it would need to go only 12-6 in its last 18 games to win 90 this season. And that’s incredible.
12 | Dancing along the light of day Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:38:55pm |
Hello, Late Night Lizards!
(Well, it’s late night in my time zone!)
Keep an eye on the Limbaugh thread, still got “it’s sarcasm” deniers popping up!
13 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:40:59pm |
re: #11 traderjoe9
Sounds like the Braves season. Couldn’t get one of if not the best pitching staff in the NL consistent run support to save their lives. We get run support, and we own that division. Ugh.
16 | traderjoe9 Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:48:10pm |
re: #13 TheMatrix31
Sounds like the Braves season. Couldn’t get one of if not the best pitching staff in the NL consistent run support to save their lives. We get run support, and we own that division. Ugh.
Look now…you have no right to complain. The Braves have won a world series in your lifetime…the Giants haven’t even won a world series in my PARENTS lifetimes.
The Giants have the second best ERA in MLB. The only reason the Dodgers have a better ERA is because they consistently face our pathetic lineup.
And as far as best rotations…
1. Lincecum
2. Cain
3. Zito
4. Sanchez
5. Penny/Bumgarner
:-)
18 | Fenway_Nation Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:50:13pm |
re: #16 traderjoe9
Yeah…what did you guys give us for Penny again? A Shake ‘N Bake coupon? A jar of pennies?
19 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:50:50pm |
20 | Silvergirl Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:52:27pm |
Time to sail off in a wooden shoe on a river of crystal light.
Dream time — good night all you late nighters!
21 | traderjoe9 Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:52:53pm |
re: #18 Fenway_Nation
Yeah…what did you guys give us for Penny again? A Shake ‘N Bake coupon? A jar of pennies?
We pretty much picked the guy up for free!
22 | Fenway_Nation Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:53:44pm |
re: #19 Slumbering Behemoth
Heya Slumbering…I actually came up with a ‘plot’ outline (however flimsy and contrived) for an episode of Fenway and the Behemoth..
23 | TheMatrix31 Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:54:28pm |
re: #16 traderjoe9
Very true. If I wasn’t a Braves fan, I would have probably ended up being a Giants fan, being from Fresno and all.
24 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Sun, Sep 20, 2009 11:56:43pm |
re: #22 Fenway_Nation
I’ll sign on as long as it involves the three key elements that are intrinsic to any F&B plot:
1. Cigars
2. Alcohol
3. Hookers
/
25 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:01:03am |
26 | I Need A Bigger Gun Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:01:49am |
To all of you media types and liberal politicians out there who say that because I’m against this administration’s policies that I’m a racist, I have a message for you; a very subtle message: go get yourselves a 64 ounce cup of SHUT THE FUCK UP!!! Skin color means absolutely NOTHING to me. The potential long-term damage to this country means everything to me. For about a third of my active duty military service, my commander-in-chief was that P.O.S. Jimmy Carter. I despised him and his policies; was I a racist then? No. Am I a racist now? Not only no, but hell no! So, you people climb back into your holes and go away until you come up with some logical way to discuss this.
27 | spiderx Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:02:38am |
has Charles moved left?
i only ask because you can’t go to a conservative blog without them cursing out LFG
In my opinion Charles has always been a realist. Sometimes that realism has put him on the right. Now it puts him on the left.
this is not radical. Many of your 80’s intellectuals that supported the Republican party now support Obama. Why is this? Many of them are realists that thought during the 80’s realism could confront the problems of the 80’s. Realism defeated communism. Remember it was the neocons that wanted Reagan to be much harder on the Soviets.
I could be wrong. Did LGF support the invasian of Iraq? If so i’m probably wrong
28 | TheMatrix31 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:03:23am |
re: #25 Floral Giraffe
It’s going to be hot as fuck all week here :-/
29 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:06:51am |
re: #28 TheMatrix31
Yes, well, it’s not like the weathermen are ALWAYS right…
30 | SixDegrees Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:08:04am |
re: #27 spiderx
has Charles moved left?
i only ask because you can’t go to a conservative blog without them cursing out LFG
In my opinion Charles has always been a realist. Sometimes that realism has put him on the right. Now it puts him on the left.
this is not radical. Many of your 80’s intellectuals that supported the Republican party now support Obama. Why is this? Many of them are realists that thought during the 80’s realism could confront the problems of the 80’s. Realism defeated communism. Remember it was the neocons that wanted Reagan to be much harder on the Soviets.
I could be wrong. Did LGF support the invasian of Iraq? If so i’m probably wrong
Calling out stupidity, intolerance and vile, disgusting behavior that occurs on the Right does not automatically make you a Leftist. Some people - notably, those indulging in such behavior themselves - don’t see it this way, and reach for the nearest shop-worn epithet they have.
Apparently, the truth hurts, and in many cases people are unwilling to do anything about it by simply stopping their odious actions and statements.
Also, on a personal note: I’m much more critical of the things I care about - because I care about them, and don’t like to see them sullied by oafs. Again, criticizing the Right doesn’t make you part of the opposition. It may just make you someone who wants better from it.
31 | Fenway_Nation Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:08:43am |
re: #24 Slumbering Behemoth
Starts w/Slumbering bedding what turns out to be a married woman (altho’ she doesn’t identify herself as such). Said woman’s husband finds out and courtesey of some item you left behind [preferrably without your picture], tracks you down to the titular charchters’ swingin’ bachelor pad. I awake one morning to a furious pounding on the door while you’re out and am promptly decked by the jealous husband as soon as I open the door.
Turns out said jealous husband is a firefighter. You find out about this and feel some remorse about being a homewrecker [however inadvertant] and urge me not to press charges while obfuscating about the married woman you bedded or why I was the one knocked the fuck out…
32 | TheMatrix31 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:09:33am |
re: #29 Floral Giraffe
Argh…they’re ALWAYS right about the heat :-/
34 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:15:01am |
re: #30 SixDegrees
I would like to compliment you on most, if not all of your posts.
I very much enjoy reading your well expressed thoughts.
Sometimes, more than an upding, is needed!
Thanks for taking the time.
35 | Fenway_Nation Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:15:15am |
re: #30 SixDegrees
I had something of an epiphany today that I hope Steele, Romney, Pawlenty, Gulianni or whomever can pick up on.
For 2010 and 2012, they should run on a platform of fiscal conservatism before they get caught up in the social conservatism issues. If they really want to press matters in that regard, then they should send out a few trial balloons after they’ve been elected.
A jobless recovery doesn’t mean much if you’re one of the jobless. Double-digit unemployment and skyrocketing commodity prices aren’t exactly signs of a recovering economy.
36 | TheMatrix31 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:17:15am |
re: #35 Fenway_Nation
Yeah, I’m a social conservative too but fiscal/foreign is the most important thing at the moment. Start with it!
Thats why I like Linda McMahon’s platform. She’s running against that fucker Chris Dodd for the Senate spot. Her website only discusses fiscal issues because that’s what’s drawing her in.
38 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:18:50am |
re: #25 Floral Giraffe
What’s tonight’s forecast?
Fenway has to bail The Behemoth out of jail after he propositions a cop disguised as a hooker. The twist: The Behemoth asks the “hooker’s” price, and then demands she pay him $200 to make up the difference for his “Stud Fee”. The cop doesn’t find it funny.
Out of deep gratitude for the bail out, The Behemoth takes Fenway out to The Bar where he gets uproariously drunk and engulfs a patron in flames when he accidentally touches his lit cigar to her polyester jacket.
/
39 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:22:24am |
re: #38 Slumbering Behemoth
LOL!
I was a juror on a trial for a “john” picking up a prostitute (who was an undercover policewoman) in LA, once upon a time. It was actually funny.
41 | Fenway_Nation Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:24:46am |
re: #38 Slumbering Behemoth
Would it be too contrived for the unfaithful wife to bed the Fenway in a bid to get him to drop the charges against her husband so he won’t lose his job?
42 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:24:58am |
re: #27 spiderx
First of all, I agree with SixDegrees completely.
Second- that’s a strange question to ask. The only thing that’s changed is the mask slipped off everyone else and we see clearly now with whom it is we’re dealing. They assumed everyone would be cool with that. They thought wrong. There’s been no shifting sands- just a line drawn.
43 | iceweasel Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:26:41am |
re: #4 Silvergirl
This above all: to thine own self be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man.
Favourited, SG. You rock.
44 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:27:17am |
re: #41 Fenway_Nation
Not at all. We ain’t writing Shakespeare here, brother.
45 | Fenway_Nation Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:27:31am |
re: #39 Floral Giraffe
LOL!
I was a juror on a trial for a “john” picking up a prostitute (who was an undercover policewoman) in LA, once upon a time. It was actually funny.
Yea…thanks for bringing that up.
/I was mortified.
47 | The Other Les Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:30:37am |
I had a silly thought.
Visualize for a moment a few urban gangster types (likely wanna-be gang bangers) sitting in their absurdly pimped out car at a red light with the stereo emitting the usual noise.
Crossing the intersection in an ornate carriage is someone who looks like Frederick the Great, following the carriage on wagons is an orchestra playing the Brandenburg Concerto, drowning out the stereo in the gangster car. We see the astounded expressions on the faces of the gangsters.
Just a thought I had while parked at a taxi stand with the radio on the local classical station.
48 | iceweasel Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:30:54am |
re: #26 I Need A Bigger Gun
To all of you media types and liberal politicians out there who say that because I’m against this administration’s policies that I’m a racist, I have a message for you
Sorry. Some people do play the race card all the time. Al Sharpton is a good example.
That isn’t what is going on now when people point out the very real
examples of real racism against our POTUS.
It’s easy to criticise the POTUS and his admin’s policies and not be called a racist. Just don’t make racist criticisms.
50 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:34:22am |
re: #47 The Other Les
Sounds like any night on Hollywood Boulevard…The orchestra is in the carriage, though…
51 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:34:25am |
re: #47 The Other Les
Nix the heavy handed “gansta” stereotype, and you may just have Grey Poupon commercial there.
52 | iceweasel Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:38:34am |
re: #27 spiderx
AFAIK, LGF and Charles have always been anti-idiotarian above all else. That’s why I hang here.
The wingnuts made assumptions about him and loooved him— when the idiots he was pointing out were only on the left.
Now they’re crying and shrieking and calling him a traitor— although he was never a wingnut at all, and his alleged apostacy consists in pointing out idiots wherever he finds them. Even on the right.
My opinion only.
53 | iceweasel Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:41:07am |
re: #49 Floral Giraffe
Hiya, Ice!
Hey honey! {FG} How are you? I keep being here at the wrong times to chat with you and it makes me sad!
54 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:41:10am |
re: #39 Floral Giraffe
LOL!
I was a juror on a trial for a “john” picking up a prostitute (who was an undercover policewoman) in LA, once upon a time. It was actually funny.
Recently I was called into a jury pool. The cases included two crack dealers, robbery with a firearm, arson of an occupied dwelling, and multiple instances and types of sexual molestation of a female under the age of 12 by a male over the age of 30.
I wasn’t chosen to sit on any of the juries. Forgive me for being damned glad that I wasn’t chosen for that last one. I know that juries are needed for even the most repulsive trials, and I’m reasonably certain that I would have fairly and impartially discharged my duty as a citizen juror, but sitting through that little girl’s testimony and cross-examination (and yes, she was going to testify) would have been sheer heartbreaking hell to endure. It was wincingly painful even to hear the counsels discuss the specifics of th case before they chose their jurors from the pool.
55 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:41:54am |
re: #45 Fenway_Nation
LOL!
It was NOT you.
I know this, because, teh stupids, well one of them had his MOTHER testify that her son would never do such a thing. Another line of “defense” was that they were on their way to meet their girlfriends, so they couldn’t have done this.
I do wish I were making this up.
You have NO IDEA how painfull it was to sit through DAYS of this.
56 | Fenway_Nation Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:42:25am |
re: #44 Slumbering Behemoth
I could imagine the dialogue where you’re trying to persuade me not to press charges without letting slip you were the one the firefighter’s wife slept with.
the Behemoth: “C’mon Fen! These guys are heroes…they rush into burning buildings and all kinds of dangerous shit”
The Fenway: “Yeah, but our apartment wasn’t on fire this morning and…wait a second. Wasn’t it just last month you called them a bunch of hose-toting, dalmatian grooming, grab-assing jag-offs?”
the Behemoth: “Well…er…can’t a guy have a change of heart?”
the Fenway: “Oh…so now that one of them knocked my ass out, they’re back to being heroes?”
Or towards the end of the episode where we watch from a distance as the husband and wife appear to reconcile at The Bar:
the Behemoth: “Isn’t it good that they’re back together?”
the Fenway: “Fuck no. That marriage will be a train-wreck. Mark my words.”
the Behemoth: “Yea…but at least we get to watch from a distance instead of being the ones on the runaway train”
the Fenway: “OK- I’ll drink to that”
the Behemoth (raising glass): “To [firefighter’s name] and [wife’s name]…”
the Fenway (raising glass): “May they be somebody else’s problem now”
57 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:42:58am |
re: #53 iceweasel
Well, tomorrow’s not gonna be fun, but I do like the late night LGF’rs!
{ice}
That repairman better not call at 8am…
58 | eddiespaghetti Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:46:15am |
And, due to pressure from the Nancy, it appears @bama’s knees are getting wobbly. Stiffen up, your the Commander in Chief, this shit isn’t easy.
If he bails on this, it will cost him Gates and McChrystal, and deservedly so.
59 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:47:33am |
re: #54 Salamantis
I once got a whole courtroom of potential jurrors thrown out.
The judge was SO pissed at me. It was a machine shop accident, where the victim had his arm cut off at the shoulder. He had settled with most of the parties responsible, and the defense lawyer was trying to claim that since he’d received a lot of settlements, the victim wasn’t entitled to anything from his client. I did try to talk to the judge in private, but was told to “state my objection”. So, I did. I got around 400 potential jurrors out of that mess.
60 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:52:14am |
re: #56 Fenway_Nation
the Fenway: “Oh…so now that one of them knocked my ass out, they’re back to being heroes?”
Hahaha!
I swear, if I see a sitcom that is ripping this stuff off I am gonna be super pissed.
62 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:54:49am |
re: #59 Floral Giraffe
What was your objection?
63 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:55:59am |
re: #59 Floral Giraffe
I once got a whole courtroom of potential jurrors thrown out.
The judge was SO pissed at me. It was a machine shop accident, where the victim had his arm cut off at the shoulder. He had settled with most of the parties responsible, and the defense lawyer was trying to claim that since he’d received a lot of settlements, the victim wasn’t entitled to anything from his client. I did try to talk to the judge in private, but was told to “state my objection”. So, I did. I got around 400 potential jurrors out of that mess.
A friend of mine was a juror on a civil case where a cop moonlighting as an orderly at a mental health facility used an illegal chokehold on a disorderly mentally ill institutionalized patient and killed him.
All the other jurors wanted to vote innocent, not least because they were either willing to give a cop a pass or were fearful of reprisals from our local police department. She stood her ground for days, and finally got the man’s bereaved parents a 175 thousand buck wrongful death settlement.
64 | Fenway_Nation Mon, Sep 21, 2009 12:59:16am |
re: #60 Slumbering Behemoth
The writers probably have dedicated people combing the blogs, chatrooms and bulliten boards for materiel.
/Nice work if you can get it, I suppose.
65 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:00:17am |
re: #62 Slumbering Behemoth
The man lost his arm at the shoulder through no fault of his own, other than working there. He could never hold & hug his kids with both arms.
Among other things.
It was a power saw attached to a wall. There was a parking lot on the other side of the wall. A car backed into the wall, as the man went to use the saw, the car hit. Shop owner, parking lot owner, parking lot renter, driver of the car & more all involved.
Still, how do you put a price on an arm?
Besides, “he’s collected enough allready” is bullshit.
That’s for the jury to decide.
66 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:03:24am |
re: #63 Salamantis
I might find out what the process is like, as I have received my first jury summons in thirty:mumble: years of life on this planet.
For the last week I have been getting the “Check the website at this time tomorrow” response.
67 | eddiespaghetti Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:04:29am |
68 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:05:12am |
re: #65 Floral Giraffe
The man lost his arm at the shoulder through no fault of his own, other than working there. He could never hold & hug his kids with both arms.
Among other things.It was a power saw attached to a wall. There was a parking lot on the other side of the wall. A car backed into the wall, as the man went to use the saw, the car hit. Shop owner, parking lot owner, parking lot renter, driver of the car & more all involved.
Still, how do you put a price on an arm?Besides, “he’s collected enough allready” is bullshit.
That’s for the jury to decide.
The lawyer for the man accused of child molestation asked the jury pool if they could accept the idea that a child could lie about being molested by his client in order to revenge herself for being disciplined by him. The counsel for the state immediately objected that the defence counsel was attempting to try the case before the jury pool, and the objection was sustained. Defence counsel was ordered not to bring up such defences in any further questioning of a jury pool, and we were all dismissed as potential jurors from the case.
71 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:12:43am |
It was a blatant attempt by the defence counsel to find out which jurors might be most sympathetic to such a defence, so he could choose them for his client’s jury.
72 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:13:13am |
re: #68 Salamantis
I think you should thank your lucky stars for getting dismissed from that one. And know, that while flawed, the jury system is the fairest, IMHO, in the world. I have been a juror over 20 times. I won’t say all of the juries were great, but I do think that there were at least 2 or more antiidiotarians on each jury, and that justice was done. They weren’t my “peers” in many ways, but neither was I their “peer” in other ways.
My Dad had a homicide case, where the husband & wife were drinking & got into a fight. He pulled a knife & cut her badly, she shot him dead. The trial went on for months. I would have had a hard time with that.
I would have also had a hard time with the child molestation trial.
73 | Salamantis Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:15:55am |
Just fyi, I have now exceeded 20,000 karma points in less than 13,200 posts, for a ratio exceeding 1.5 karma points per post. I guess people here must think I’m doing something right…;~)
74 | SixDegrees Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:17:24am |
re: #34 Floral Giraffe
I would like to compliment you on most, if not all of your posts.
I very much enjoy reading your well expressed thoughts.
Sometimes, more than an upding, is needed!
Thanks for taking the time.
Thank you.
75 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:19:47am |
76 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:20:39am |
re: #74 SixDegrees
You have earned it.
Please keep up the good work!
I like learning, and I learn a lot here.
77 | Escaped Hillbilly Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:22:00am |
re: #65 Floral Giraffe
The man lost his arm at the shoulder through no fault of his own, other than working there. He could never hold & hug his kids with both arms.
Among other things.It was a power saw attached to a wall. There was a parking lot on the other side of the wall. A car backed into the wall, as the man went to use the saw, the car hit. Shop owner, parking lot owner, parking lot renter, driver of the car & more all involved.
Still, how do you put a price on an arm?Besides, “he’s collected enough allready” is bullshit.
That’s for the jury to decide.
I agree with the last sentence…that is never a reason to throw a case. BUT REALLY? The parking lot owner, shop owner, lot renter…all involved? Really? That sort of reasoning is what is bankrupting this country. The driver of the car is the sole responsible party unless you have a lot more info you haven’t shared. This poor guy lost an arm. And everybody else lost an arm and a leg.
78 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:24:38am |
re: #77 Escaped Hillbilly
Would you still feel that way, if it was YOUR arm?
80 | Escaped Hillbilly Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:28:28am |
re: #78 Floral Giraffe
Would you still feel that way, if it was YOUR arm?
Yes. My nephew was hit by a drunk driver and paralyzed. He died about a year later of the lingering effects. My sister sued BOTH tavern owners (who had cut him off when he had drank too much but not stopped him from driving home) the police (who were already on the way when he was struck thanks to an anonymous tip) and HIS PARENTS for reasons that remain nebulous to me. They won some, lost some. By the time the first suit was won, he had only 3 months left. My sister and her husband are driving his specially adapted van and fighting with his fiance over the rest. Shameful. Breaks my mother’s heart. This was not how we were raised.
81 | Escaped Hillbilly Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:30:02am |
I guess my question is…what made the shop owener et al responsible for the accident? Were they in some way negligent?
82 | SixDegrees Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:31:08am |
re: #77 Escaped Hillbilly
I agree with the last sentence…that is never a reason to throw a case. BUT REALLY? The parking lot owner, shop owner, lot renter…all involved? Really? That sort of reasoning is what is bankrupting this country. The driver of the car is the sole responsible party unless you have a lot more info you haven’t shared. This poor guy lost an arm. And everybody else lost an arm and a leg.
Disagree. The others - or more properly, their insurance companies - lost money. Not body parts, which are irreplaceable.
And Floral was quite correct to point out that it isn’t up to the defense to decide that a plaintiff had received “enough”; that decision properly lies with the jury, or the judge if all parties agree to a bench trial. That the defense would even offer such a rationale is somewhat astonishing; it walks right up to the line between bringing suit and actually testifying before the jury pool, and I suspect it was his or Floral’s crossing of that line that led to the dismissal of the pool, now tainted by such remarks.
83 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:35:50am |
re: #81 Escaped Hillbilly
I was not seated for the trial, but, if I recall correctly ( and it was a LONG time ago) there were issues with how the saw was installed to the wall (shop owner) and issues with the wall being next to a parking lot (building owner knew better than the law) driver made a mistake, and more.
I am sorry for your family’s loss & heartbreak. It’s NEVER easy to lose a loved one, and to do so through bad decisions is even harder.
I wish you well.
84 | Escaped Hillbilly Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:36:13am |
re: #82 SixDegrees
It was not up to defense to decide if he had received enough. We already agreed on that point.
MY point is…the judge and or jury should not have given him a dime from people who are INNOCENT of any wrong doing. This is putting a gun to my head cause you got robbed mentality. That shop owner may have had to declare bankrupcy over this case. Do not assume “insurance” paid for it all. PS, where does “insurance” money come from? Hint: same place “government funds” come from. I object to you reapportioning my money. Yes, this guy lost a limb. My uncle lost a limb when he cut it off sawing down trees. Should he sue Husquevarna? Maybe he should sue the property owner, my grandfather…who also lost a leg due to the complications of diabetes. Where does this end? Tragedy strikes. It is not necessarily my fault.
86 | Fenway_Nation Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:38:11am |
Still shot from this movie apparently based on this real-life incident.
87 | SixDegrees Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:38:21am |
re: #84 Escaped Hillbilly
It was not up to defense to decide if he had received enough. We already agreed on that point.
MY point is…the judge and or jury should not have given him a dime from people who are INNOCENT of any wrong doing. This is putting a gun to my head cause you got robbed mentality. That shop owner may have had to declare bankrupcy over this case. Do not assume “insurance” paid for it all. PS, where does “insurance” money come from? Hint: same place “government funds” come from. I object to you reapportioning my money. Yes, this guy lost a limb. My uncle lost a limb when he cut it off sawing down trees. Should he sue Husquevarna? Maybe he should sue the property owner, my grandfather…who also lost a leg due to the complications of diabetes. Where does this end? Tragedy strikes. It is not necessarily my fault.
Apparently, they weren’t innocent.
88 | Escaped Hillbilly Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:38:43am |
Crud, we are getting called away. Sorry to go. Thanks for the conversation. Probably be out of the loop for a while.
89 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:42:29am |
re: #82 SixDegrees
I got totally REAMED by the judge for “tainting the jury pool” and was young enough to be intimidated by him. He did NOT like it, when I reminded him of my request to discuss my issue at the bench, in private.
Today, I’d lay into him. Then, well, he was a JUDGE, and I was a lay person. Once upon a time, long ago…LOL!
90 | ryannon Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:46:02am |
re: #9 Gus 802
Great song. There’s also the Louis Armstrong version.
I actually prefer the Grace Jones version - and there are a number of them. The visuals in this one are fantastic - they were created by Jean-Paul Goude.
This one is softer, nearly silky - really lovely
where you’ve got a Frenchman in the comments section saying “i am French and i have to say after all the versions i heard, this is the best one, her accent is lovely!”
91 | ryannon Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:51:25am |
92 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:54:28am |
Yesterday…
93 | SixDegrees Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:54:36am |
re: #89 Floral Giraffe
I got totally REAMED by the judge for “tainting the jury pool” and was young enough to be intimidated by him. He did NOT like it, when I reminded him of my request to discuss my issue at the bench, in private.
Today, I’d lay into him. Then, well, he was a JUDGE, and I was a lay person. Once upon a time, long ago…LOL!
I’ve been called a bunch of times, but only served once. The case was a couple of high school students; one of them had allegedly spit on the other one, and the spitee’s asshole trailer-trash parents decided to take it all the way to a jury trial. No witnesses. No evidence. One idiot’s word against that of another idiot. We dismissed the charges on the basis of an assumption of innocence that wasn’t disproved by the pathetic testimony offered.
Afterward, the judge came back to the jury room and openly apologized for wasting out time, while pointing out that a jury trial was everyone’s right. He, the prosecutors and the defense attorneys had all browbeat the parents into settling - which probably would have resulted in some minor charge against the spitter, better than what they got - but they decided to be pig-headed and goad sonny-boy into an outright loss.
I collected my eight bucks and went home in time for lunch.
94 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 21, 2009 2:05:50am |
re: #93 SixDegrees
I got on the “will serve” list somehow. My employer paid for 3 days of service, to me, it was a VACATION! Showed up at 10, 2 hour lunch, dismissed at 3, what’s not to like?
Um, the trials are “what’s not to like”. I had prostitution, rape, assault with a deadly weapon, armed robbery, this really wierd real estate transaction, a couple of homicides, and then some more. Still, it was fully paid, and 1/2 or less my usual workday. ( Plus, I dated a LOT of really cute lawyers out of it). End result, jury duty is a SERVICE for our country, and our way of life. I don’t love it, but I will serve!
And, I will do my BEST to understand what the problems are, and what the legal solutions might be.
95 | SixDegrees Mon, Sep 21, 2009 2:15:48am |
re: #94 Floral Giraffe
I got on the “will serve” list somehow. My employer paid for 3 days of service, to me, it was a VACATION! Showed up at 10, 2 hour lunch, dismissed at 3, what’s not to like?
Um, the trials are “what’s not to like”. I had prostitution, rape, assault with a deadly weapon, armed robbery, this really wierd real estate transaction, a couple of homicides, and then some more. Still, it was fully paid, and 1/2 or less my usual workday. ( Plus, I dated a LOT of really cute lawyers out of it). End result, jury duty is a SERVICE for our country, and our way of life. I don’t love it, but I will serve!
And, I will do my BEST to understand what the problems are, and what the legal solutions might be.
The company I’m at now compensates for jury duty, minus the tiny compensation the court provides. Most of my former employers didn’t - you could burn vacation time or take the time unpaid. A law requiring full compensation, or providing it through the courts, would go a long way toward making service more palatable.
I think I’ve mentioned before that a lot of jurors are so pissed off at being inconvenienced that they vote for speed of resolution rather than justice. “Change my vote to go along with the majority so I can get the hell out of here? You bet!” seems to be a common attitude. In the case mentioned above, most of the discussions consisted of “Well, he seemed like such a nice boy on the stand,” without any real consideration of the situation or the scarcity of actual evidence. Once someone pointed out that this was a couple of kids and it was basically a case of one’s word against the other’s, we rapidly progressed to defaulting to an ‘innocent’ verdict, but if that hadn’t come up a lot of people seemed ready to vote based on looks and presentation.
96 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 2:25:41am |
98 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 2:34:30am |
re: #97 eddiespaghetti
*sigh* How do people spot such things?
99 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 2:36:44am |
101 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 2:43:39am |
103 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 2:44:27am |
105 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 2:46:39am |
re: #102 Taqyia2Me
But of course:
[Link: thehill.com…]
Heaven forbid we take away an Obama re-election mouthpiece.
106 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 2:47:38am |
re: #100 eddiespaghetti
Genius has many forms…
Thnk about it. Did someone see that “image” first and photograph it? Or, did someone take that photograph and then see the “image”? Disturbing implications, either way.
108 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 2:49:54am |
re: #103 Cannadian Club Akbar
Can you prove they don’t eat keys?
/
I once had a dog that ate a sock. It came out looonnnggg. I had another dog that ate a fifty-dollar bill.
Oh, I remember one of my cat once at the pipe-cleaner legs attached to his mink spider. He was lucky it didn’t perforate his guts.
109 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 2:52:10am |
re: #108 MandyManners
I worked with a kid who OD’d on Ecstasy and ended up eating $150 before being sent to the hospital. He was OK then, but he is dead now.
110 | eddiespaghetti Mon, Sep 21, 2009 2:55:39am |
re: #109 Cannadian Club Akbar
He actually ate $150 in bills? Denominations? All in $1 bills, or was it 20 benjamins, 4 ten spots & 10 one dolla bills? I am not shocked by the outcome.
112 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 2:58:35am |
re: #110 eddiespaghetti
He actually ate $150 in bills? Denominations? All in $1 bills, or was it 20 benjamins, 4 ten spots & 10 one dolla bills? I am not shocked by the outcome.
Not sure of the denominations. That was many years ago. The last time I talked to my old boss he said the dude had Od’d again. The last time he went to the hospital and after he was released he finished the job. Not sure if it was a suicide or accidental.
113 | Throbert McGee Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:00:09am |
re: #106 MandyManners
Thnk about it. Did someone see that “image” first and photograph it? Or, did someone take that photograph and then see the “image”? Disturbing implications, either way.
I think it was more like: Someone “saw” the image, took the photograph, but was disappointed when other people failed to “see” the image, and therefore decided to do a little PhotoShopping so that it would be easier to “see.”
(The sleeves are just a bit too perfect, IMO.)
114 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:01:39am |
re: #113 Throbert McGee
That’s what I was thinking. Better image there then on the Shroud of Turin.
115 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:02:27am |
re: #109 Cannadian Club Akbar
I worked with a kid who OD’d on Ecstasy and ended up eating $150 before being sent to the hospital. He was OK then, but he is dead now.
What finally got him?
116 | eddiespaghetti Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:03:03am |
re: #114 Cannadian Club Akbar
LMAO, I think it’s legit though, and totally awesome.
117 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:03:34am |
re: #115 MandyManners
What finally got him?
He overdosed from drugs. Not sure what he was taking. He liked everything.
118 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:03:41am |
re: #113 Throbert McGee
I think it was more like: Someone “saw” the image, took the photograph, but was disappointed when other people failed to “see” the image, and therefore decided to do a little PhotoShopping so that it would be easier to “see.”
(The sleeves are just a bit too perfect, IMO.)
I didn’t look at it that closely.
119 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:05:05am |
re: #117 Cannadian Club Akbar
He overdosed from drugs. Not sure what he was taking. He liked everything.
Eclecticism is not always a good thing.
121 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:07:21am |
122 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:07:43am |
He actually chastized Stephanopolous for reading the definition of “tax.”
123 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:08:45am |
re: #121 Cannadian Club Akbar
FCBBHO claimed that the fine for not gettng health insurace was not a tax.
125 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:10:25am |
re: #123 MandyManners
FCBBHO claimed that the fine for not gettng health insurace was not a tax.
I don’t know what he calls it if not a tax. Maybe someone should read him the definition of freedoms.
127 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:10:55am |
128 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:11:16am |
129 | eddiespaghetti Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:12:41am |
re: #128 MandyManners
Agreed, but what does FCBBHO stand for? I consider myself savy, but I am at a loss…
130 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:14:38am |
re: #129 eddiespaghetti
Agreed, but what does FCBBHO stand for? I consider myself savy, but I am at a loss…
Fucking Commie Bastard Barack Hussien Obama.
131 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:14:42am |
re: #125 Cannadian Club Akbar
I don’t know what he calls it if not a tax. Maybe someone should read him the definition of freedoms.
H’s into positive freedoms and positive liberty, the ones whereby the government is free to do things for you, as opposed to the philosophy of negative liberty upon which our Constitution was founded.
Oops. The Constitution. That flawed thing.
Never mind.
132 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:15:17am |
re: #129 eddiespaghetti
Agreed, but what does FCBBHO stand for? I consider myself savy, but I am at a loss…
Fucking Commie Bastard Barak Hussein Obama.
133 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:16:12am |
I don’t know but, I’ve been told that Avanti and IceWeasel want me to stop using it.
134 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:17:01am |
re: #133 MandyManners
I don’t know but, I’ve been told that Avanti and IceWeasel want me to stop using it.
To bad. It’s your right unless Charles ask you to stop.
136 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:20:00am |
Some ultra-liberal professor just caught herself not hawking the party line on Fox. She was talking about why FCBBHO said that ACORN is not the most important issue today. Paraphrasing, she said that we have a melting ecomony and a health care debate…no, a health care crisis.
HA!
137 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:21:39am |
re: #136 MandyManners
At least she went on FOX unlike Dear Leader.
138 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:23:00am |
“To thine own self be true.”
- Polonius in Hamlet
Polonius was a two-faced backstabber who spouted high-sounding platitudes and then proceeded to act very badly. Eventually he got the shaft. He betrayed his own son as well as the King.
Moral: When receiving advice, always consider the source.
Good Morning LGF.
139 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:28:23am |
re: #137 Cannadian Club Akbar
At least she went on FOX unlike Dear Leader.
Oh, for fuck’s sake, She’s just compared ACORN with the CIA, saying that agents who are charged with gathering information in Afghanistan should be held to the same level of accountability of ACORN employees.
I’d say she’s as dumb as a box of rocks but, that would be an insult to rocks.
140 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:29:49am |
re: #138 Spare O’Lake
I’ll never think of Polonious without thinking of the Skipper who sang “to thineself be true” in the play the castaways put on for one episode.
141 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:30:26am |
re: #139 MandyManners
The military or any law enforcement agency is alway a boogy man to the left.
142 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:32:13am |
re: #141 Cannadian Club Akbar
The military or any law enforcement agency is alway a boogy man to the left.
Perhaps because honor and integrity are concepts not built on the shifting sands of relativism.
144 | Dad O' Blondes Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:35:07am |
re: #10 Fenway_Nation
Well…Army actually won this weekend.
/wonders if they’ll be bowl-eligible this year.
Yep, I was there. What a spectacular day. Every September, there’s a run of few days with this glorious late summer weather: cool, crisp and crystal blue skies. And so it was at West Point on Saturday.
We were sitting in the “A Club” section, special seating, and sitting a few seats away from me was a young Lt. with a pretty young woman, I presume his wife. He stood out as a junior officer in this seating area, usually reserved for high ranking officers, etc.
Turns out the Lt. was there to be acknowledged as the 2009 Nininger Award winner. During a 4th Quarter timeout at Michie Stadium, The Lt. was brought out onto the playing field and the public address announcer gave a short summary of his story, and what he did to earn the award.
The entire crowd of 40,000 people gave him a well-deserved standing ovation — and it lasted two minutes. I had the honor of shaking his hand and having a few words with him when he returned to his seat. Numerous generals and other VIP’s crowded around for the remainder of the game.
Lt. Nicholas Eslinger, 2009 Nininger Award Recipient. Here’s his story:
[Link: www.westpointaog.org…]
And oh yes, Army beat Ball State 24-17.
.
145 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:35:40am |
re: #143 eddiespaghetti
Well, your lucky Sharm is not on your case. Hell hath no furry, JC.
Don’t be mean to Sharmuta.
146 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:35:49am |
re: #143 eddiespaghetti
Well, your lucky Sharm is not on your case. Hell hath no furry, JC.
Excuse me?
147 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:39:02am |
re: #144 Dad O’ Blondes
It could have turned out very differently. Wow. What a man!
149 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:40:39am |
re: #143 eddiespaghetti
Well, your lucky Sharm is not on your case. Hell hath no furry, JC.
Don’t be a twit, she’s magically delicious!
151 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:41:25am |
I’m gonna’ go get the IV drip going. bbiasec
155 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:45:56am |
re: #12 Floral Giraffe
Hello, Late Night Lizards!
(Well, it’s late night in my time zone!)Keep an eye on the Limbaugh thread, still got “it’s sarcasm” deniers popping up!
Well, I think it was sarcasm.
But… I also think he should have known better.
156 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:47:11am |
re: #155 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Well, I think it was sarcasm.
But… I also think he should have known better.
I didn’t read it but, has anyone thought to ask Limbaugh if it was sarcasm?
157 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:48:28am |
re: #156 MandyManners
I didn’t read it but, has anyone thought to ask Limbaugh if it was sarcasm?
[Link: www.rushlimbaugh.com…]
158 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:49:58am |
re: #156 MandyManners
Dunno. He’s being accused of being a total, unrepentant racist.
I just don’t know what’s in his heart.
159 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:50:13am |
re: #156 MandyManners
The kid who came to the white kid’s defense was black. It wasn’t a race based attack. The whole sarcasm thing aside- it was race baiting to suggest white kids aren’t safe because of this incident.
160 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:55:06am |
re: #157 Cannadian Club Akbar
[Link: www.rushlimbaugh.com…]
I don’t know what to make of it.
BTW, I have a recollection that it was Pelosi who started the “Nazi” thing, claiming that there were posters depicting FCBBHO as Hitler before there actually were such posters.
161 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:55:12am |
Sorry for starting it back up. Good morning y’all.
162 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:56:41am |
re: #159 Sharmuta
The kid who came to the white kid’s defense was black. It wasn’t a race based attack. The whole sarcasm thing aside- it was race baiting to suggest white kids aren’t safe because of this incident.
Correct about the kid coming to help. The 2 doing the beating were charged as juviniles.[Link: www.stltoday.com…]
163 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:58:16am |
164 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:03:04am |
re: #159 Sharmuta
The kid who came to the white kid’s defense was black. It wasn’t a race based attack. The whole sarcasm thing aside- it was race baiting to suggest white kids aren’t safe because of this incident.
Why in the world aren’t monitors placed on busses? Surely volunteers could be found to give up X amount time daily to sit on the bus and keep an eye on things. Those kids are in the custody of the state the moment they step onto the bus and they need a safe environment. Ah, gee. Reason No. 305 that The Kid is in private school. The school has some busses for students who live 50+ miles away but some parents deal with it by having two homes, one near the school, mostly those who live 75 miles away or more.
165 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:03:28am |
Oops. Sorry. Didn’t intend for that to come out as a personal rant.
166 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:04:02am |
re: #160 MandyManners
It’s my opinion kids are going to be as safe in school from little jerks wanting to beat them up as they were last week, last month, last year. It’s not right- but it happens. For this to get hyped up by national pundits as a racial incident is a stretch and reeks of agenda. My 2 cents.
re: #162 Cannadian Club Akbar
I’m glad there is some punishment involved. Serves them right.
167 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:04:38am |
re: #158 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Dunno. He’s being accused of being a total, unrepentant racist.
I just don’t know what’s in his heart.
He’s neve, ever struck me as such and I have a rather keen racism detector. But, I could be wrong. I sometimes am.
168 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:05:30am |
re: #162 Cannadian Club Akbar
Correct about the kid coming to help. The 2 doing the beating were charged as juviniles.[Link: www.stltoday.com…]
What passes for a routine assault looked close to attempted murder to me - repeatedly pummelling a defenseless kid in the head.
They should be charged as adults.
169 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:06:35am |
Bill Clinton is giving a speech in Sarasota next week and the organizers of the event are worried because it hasn’t sold out yet. D’oh!!!
170 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:07:12am |
re: #169 Cannadian Club Akbar
Ever since Obama became President, Bill Clinton has been sooo~ 20th Century.
171 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:07:16am |
re: #168 Spare O’Lake
They are to young. But I agree.
173 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:10:42am |
re: #159 Sharmuta
The kid who came to the white kid’s defense was black. It wasn’t a race based attack. The whole sarcasm thing aside- it was race baiting to suggest white kids aren’t safe because of this incident.
If he was being srcastic, was there any race-baiting?
One way to shut down race-baiters in real life is this: when a suspicious statement is made, feign puzzlement and ask the person to clarify. If she/he does and makes a more blatant racist statement, arch our eyebrows, adopt a frosty tone and say, “My, what an interesting assumption” and then turn your back.
Or, you can do what I’ve done before and ask if Jesus came to save us all or just the white folks and if the former, why in the world would we try to put ourselves above Christ.
(You is in the third-person here.)
174 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:12:53am |
re: #166 Sharmuta
It’s my opinion kids are going to be as safe in school from little jerks wanting to beat them up as they were last week, last month, last year. It’s not right- but it happens. For this to get hyped up by national pundits as a racial incident is a stretch and reeks of agenda. My 2 cents.
re: #162 Cannadian Club Akbar
I’m glad there is some punishment involved. Serves them right.
There is a difference between “normal” bullying and that which rises to the level of physical violence. Kids need to be taught how to
Oh, I’m getting pissed off. bbiab ^%&^%$$#%^&^
175 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:13:56am |
re: #159 Sharmuta
The kid who came to the white kid’s defense was black. It wasn’t a race based attack.
Sorry, but I don’t think the first necessarily follows from the second.
I’m not saying that it was or was not racially motivated, but just because a black kid tried to end the pummeling does not mean that the perp was not racially motivated.
176 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:14:27am |
re: #174 MandyManners
I get pissed too. I understand. I would have you go read the thread though- watch the video, read what others thought, and form your own conclusions.
177 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:16:09am |
re: #175 Spare O’Lake
The investigation concluded it wasn’t racially motivated.
178 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:18:16am |
re: #177 Sharmuta
The investigation concluded it wasn’t racially motivated.
Did the investigation ascribe any particular motives to the perpetrators?
179 | razorbacker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:19:50am |
It would have been much simpler for the school authorities had the pummeled kid made some effort to defend himself. Then the attacked kid could have been expelled too, under ‘zero tolerance’. He didn’t, so that out wasn’t available.
Interestingly enough, once I began driving to school my younger brothers decided that they would rather continue riding the bus. Said there weren’t as many rules on the bus as in my car.
180 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:21:54am |
re: #177 Sharmuta
Shar… when I was in school, I was beaten up a few times because I was white and because they were stronger and bigger than me.
Is that racial?…or bullying.
Other small black kids weren’t attacked on those occasions.
Anybody out there been in that kids situation? I have. To say it is not racial… is just a little beyond me.
I was picked on by white kids too, but, because I was small.
I also survived a race riot at my high school where they had to shut it down for three days… big black kids went hunting for small white kids… racial violence does exist.
181 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:24:13am |
BELLEVILLE, IL (KMOX News) — Investigators , looking into a beating on a Belleville West High School bus now say it does not appear to have been racially motivated and it may have been just an argument over seating on the bus.
Belleville Police spokesman Captain Don Sax said “it’s looking more and more like a case of a couple bullies deciding where kids are going to sit on the bus.”
Captain Sax said an earlier statement that the beating may have been racially motivated was premature.
It’s still up to the State’s Attorney’s office to decide what, if any charges will be filed.
[Link: www.kmox.com…]
182 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:28:26am |
re: #181 Spare O’Lake
I wonder how hard investigators were lobbied by mayors town councils (etc) to get a “It wasn’t racism” label attached…
Sorry, I just don’t buy it.
183 | Jetpilot1101 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:28:53am |
Just a quick drive-by on my way to work. I haven’t listened to Limbaugh in a long time but catch him on ond off. He doesn’t strike me as a racist and while I think his brand of satire in that situation was completely uncalled for and was “race baiting”, I don’t believe he harbors any ill will towards black people or any other race for that matter. When Limbaugh makes statements that could be constrewed as legitimately racist, the MSM is all over him like stink on a monkey. I’m not a fan of Limbaugh because I see him as heading slowly down Beck insanity lane. With all that being said, I really think that if we are going to jump on Limbaugh for this, we should be just as apt to pile on Sharpton and Jackson etc. when they are obviously “race baiting”. I appreciate Charles calling a spade a spade and as always, the comments have been very informative. Have a great week all.
184 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:29:51am |
re: #177 Sharmuta
The investigation concluded it wasn’t racially motivated.
Then why in the world did the sheriff speak out of turn in the first place?! Very irresponsible.
185 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:32:17am |
re: #180 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Shar… when I was in school, I was beaten up a few times because I was white and because they were stronger and bigger than me.
Is that racial?…or bullying.
Other small black kids weren’t attacked on those occasions.
Anybody out there been in that kids situation? I have. To say it is not racial… is just a little beyond me.
I was picked on by white kids too, but, because I was small.
I also survived a race riot at my high school where they had to shut it down for three days… big black kids went hunting for small white kids… racial violence does exist.
It can be both racist and bullying—the two are not mutually exclusive.
186 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:32:22am |
re: #180 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
When I was in school, I once got roughed up by some boys, but it wasn’t gender related. I had said something in class they didn’t like.
After that, my father taught me how to punch (again) and the next time a boy tried to rough me up, I gave him a bloody nose. The next time I was roughed up, it was a girl, and she was pretty surprised I wouldn’t take her shit, so she tried a second time a few days later. Her attack was likely more due to misogyny than the boys, imo.
Kids can and do beat each other up for these things, and other things just as much. It doesn’t change the fact that it’s out of line to suggest white kids aren’t safe in this country because of the President. That’s straight up fear mongering using kids as emotional tools like that.
[Incidentally- I later ran into one of the boys from the first attack when we were in college. He apologized to me, and took me out for a drink.]
187 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:33:53am |
re: #184 MandyManners
Then why in the world did the sheriff speak out of turn in the first place?! Very irresponsible.
Why is Rush throwing fuel on this fire?
188 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:34:11am |
re: #186 Sharmuta
A guy once threw me into a table in the 11th grade, I came back at him with a steel fork. Unfortunately he turned the tables on that too and I got punched out.
I was the one that ended up getting expelled. Technically it’s “withdrawn” but I went to one of the best private schools in the country, and they don’t want the hoi polloi mixing.
189 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:34:43am |
re: #186 Sharmuta
When I was in school, I once got roughed up by some boys, but it wasn’t gender related. I had said something in class they didn’t like.
After that, my father taught me how to punch (again) and the next time a boy tried to rough me up, I gave him a bloody nose. The next time I was roughed up, it was a girl, and she was pretty surprised I wouldn’t take her shit, so she tried a second time a few days later. Her attack was likely more due to misogyny than the boys, imo.
Kids can and do beat each other up for these things, and other things just as much. It doesn’t change the fact that it’s out of line to suggest white kids aren’t safe in this country because of the President. That’s straight up fear mongering using kids as emotional tools like that.
[Incidentally- I later ran into one of the boys from the first attack when we were in college. He apologized to me, and took me out for a drink.]
Misogyny or girl-bullying, trying to put you under herserlf in her pecking order?
190 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:35:00am |
re: #182 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
I wonder how hard investigators were lobbied by mayors town councils (etc) to get a “It wasn’t racism” label attached…
Sorry, I just don’t buy it.
Does anyone find it ironic that they are denying that it was racially motivated, saying instead that it was more a case of BULLIES TELLING A KID THAT HE COULD NOT SIT IN WHATEVER EMPTY FUCKING SEAT HE WANTED?
I can’t help but wonder if perhaps they wanted him to sit at the back of the bus.
…the “investigation” continues?
191 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:35:13am |
192 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:35:30am |
re: #186 Sharmuta
When I was a kid a boy got beat up and his father went to the house of the kid who did the beating. The father answered the door and the father of the kid that was beat up said “your son beat up my son.” The guy replied that he only had a daughter. Heh.
193 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:35:34am |
re: #189 MandyManners
Misogyny or girl-bullying, trying to put you under herserlf in her pecking order?
Absolutely.
194 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:36:40am |
re: #191 MandyManners
Wasn’t it flaming already?
Yes- by the likes of vdare supporting Michelle Malkin and other bloggers.
195 | razorbacker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:36:50am |
It was unacknowledged policy in my small school for fighting kids to be put in boxing gloves and allowed to fight it out during gym class.
My turn came, as it would given that I graduated standing 5’8” and weighing 118 pounds (pretty good stats for a supermodel, but not for a young man). I refused to wear gloves, and stated that my intention was to get my hands on the opponent and dislocate his shoulders and bust up his knees.
It was decided that sincere apologies were in order, instead.
196 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:37:04am |
re: #190 Spare O’Lake
When I was in school; (YES! THEY HAD BUSSES THEN!) the back of the bus was where the cool kids sat, anyway.
197 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:37:58am |
I’m reminded of the little boys at the park a while back who taunted The Kid for being white and who refused to give me his football, one opting instead to call me a “white cracker bitch”. He’s young enough to be merely parrotting what he’s heard at home.
At what age are kids to be held responsible for their words?
198 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:38:36am |
re: #192 Cannadian Club Akbar
When I was a kid a boy got beat up and his father went to the house of the kid who did the beating. The father answered the door and the father of the kid that was beat up said “your son beat up my son.” The guy replied that he only had a daughter. Heh.
Some Dads know Baby Girl’s got to protect herself. LOL
199 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:39:14am |
re: #195 razorbacker
I graduated about the same size as you. My high school had 2,000 students. The average height on the JV basketball team was 6’7” that year.
I felt like a woodland creature among the trees when I was there.
200 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:39:46am |
re: #198 Sharmuta
Some Dads know Baby Girl’s got to protect herself. LOL
The kid who got the beating might have gotten another when his dad found out exactly what happened.
201 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:40:39am |
My dinger ain’t working… bunch of dings I want to give!
…(in bed)
203 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:43:01am |
re: #193 Sharmuta
Absolutely.
Girls tend to be more subtle and nuanced in setting up their pecking orders, and more cruel. Boys typically have such venues as sports, which are sublimated violence, to set up their hierarchy.
204 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:43:09am |
re: #201 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
My dinger ain’t working… bunch of dings I want to give!
…(in bed)
I have a great joke to put here, but I won’t.
205 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:43:51am |
re: #194 Sharmuta
Yes- by the likes of vdare supporting Michelle Malkin and other bloggers.
I still cannot wrap my mind around her de-linking Charles and then linking VDARE. Shades of AS.
206 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:44:32am |
re: #195 razorbacker
It was unacknowledged policy in my small school for fighting kids to be put in boxing gloves and allowed to fight it out during gym class.
My turn came, as it would given that I graduated standing 5’8” and weighing 118 pounds (pretty good stats for a supermodel, but not for a young man). I refused to wear gloves, and stated that my intention was to get my hands on the opponent and dislocate his shoulders and bust up his knees.
It was decided that sincere apologies were in order, instead.
Were you ever messed with again?
207 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:45:14am |
208 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:45:30am |
re: #196 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
When I was in school; (YES! THEY HAD BUSSES THEN!) the back of the bus was where the cool kids sat, anyway.
That’s where we pot-smokers sat on our band’s trips out of town.
209 | razorbacker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:45:41am |
re: #199 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
I graduated about the same size as you. My high school had 2,000 students. The average height on the JV basketball team was 6’7” that year.
I felt like a woodland creature among the trees when I was there.
My town only had 2100 people, so the school was somewhat smaller. While I was short and slight, I had the advantage of a lifetime spend pulling wrenches, lifting fishing nets, and processing game and domestic animals. Good grip, and excellent knowledge of how the body’s joints went together.
I was seldom bullied. It helped, no doubt, that I ran with the bully-boy crowd and had some experience in physical combat outside the school environment.
210 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:46:18am |
re: #203 MandyManners
Girls tend to be more subtle and nuanced in setting up their pecking orders, and more cruel. Boys typically have such venues as sports, which are sublimated violence, to set up their hierarchy.
There are pecking orders within pecking orders. Some racially related, some gang-related, and some just innocent kids being kids.
211 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:46:49am |
re: #197 MandyManners
You know I don’t think that crap is cool. But it’s still odd this one incident would be worthy of national attention by right wing bloggers connected to sites like vdare. What the hell is going on that Rush needs to discuss this, and use it like he did? Stinks.
212 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:47:08am |
213 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:47:50am |
re: #203 MandyManners
Girls tend to be more subtle and nuanced in setting up their pecking orders, and more cruel. Boys typically have such venues as sports, which are sublimated violence, to set up their hierarchy.
You should check out Phyllis Chesler’s Woman’s Inhumanity to Woman.
214 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:48:43am |
re: #211 Sharmuta
You know I don’t think that crap is cool. But it’s still odd this one incident would be worthy of national attention by right wing bloggers connected to sites like vdare. What the hell is going on that Rush needs to discuss this, and use it like he did? Stinks.
Must be his idea of the much-awaited national conversation on race./
215 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:49:20am |
re: #210 Spare O’Lake
There are pecking orders within pecking orders. Some racially related, some gang-related, and some just innocent kids being kids.
While I had a few close friends, I preferred hanging out with boys in high school.
216 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:49:41am |
re: #213 Sharmuta
You should check out Phyllis Chesler’s Woman’s Inhumanity to Woman.
The girl vs. girl fights in high skool were always better then the guys.
217 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:50:10am |
re: #211 Sharmuta
You know I don’t think that crap is cool. But it’s still odd this one incident would be worthy of national attention by right wing bloggers connected to sites like vdare. What the hell is going on that Rush needs to discuss this, and use it like he did? Stinks.
Is there any chance Rush sought to mock VDARE and its ilk?
218 | razorbacker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:50:49am |
re: #206 MandyManners
Were you ever messed with again?
Young men fight. That’s just the way that it was. I doubt that it has changed too terribly much in the decades past.
Oddly enough, though firearms were always available (see past posts regarding guns on school campus during hunting seasons) guns were never used to settle fights.
219 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:52:03am |
re: #212 Cannadian Club Akbar
Band camp?
/
Out-of-town games and out-of-state competitions. Our mommies took us to camp. (Oh, I hated that week—it was always in late July/early August in Tennessee. Heat and humidity. Oh, my. I’m getting sticky just remembering it.)
220 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:52:47am |
re: #213 Sharmuta
You should check out Phyllis Chesler’s Woman’s Inhumanity to Woman.
It’s on my to-read list but, I think I’ve picked a lot of her thinking throughout other endeavors.
221 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:54:03am |
re: #218 razorbacker
Young men fight. That’s just the way that it was. I doubt that it has changed too terribly much in the decades past.
Oddly enough, though firearms were always available (see past posts regarding guns on school campus during hunting seasons) guns were never used to settle fights.
In some circles, drive-bys rule.
222 | Vicious Babushka Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:54:27am |
Some banned lizard posted crap on my blog, bashing Charles, when he knew that it was Rosh Hashanah and I could not delete blog comments. It’s gone now.
223 | razorbacker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:55:40am |
re: #221 MandyManners
In some circles, drive-bys rule.
So I hear. You would have been known as a weak sister indeed, had you needed to settle arguments with a gun.
But, times change, I reckon.
224 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:55:45am |
re: #217 MandyManners
Is there any chance Rush sought to mock VDARE and its ilk?
No.
re: #220 MandyManners
It’s on my to-read list but, I think I’ve picked a lot of her thinking throughout other endeavors.
I’m sure you have, Hon. I still think you’d really like it, and I’m glad it’s on your reading list. :)
226 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:56:56am |
re: #222 Alouette
See why I don’t go to other sites?
227 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:57:08am |
re: #222 Alouette
Some banned lizard posted crap on my blog, bashing Charles, when he knew that it was Rosh Hashanah and I could not delete blog comments. It’s gone now.
IIRC the Arabs tried something like that in 1973./
228 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:58:42am |
Trying to explain to The Kid why he shouldn’t hit back when girls hit him was a struggle. One idea was that boys were sronger than girls. “BUT, MOM, YOU SAW HOW BIG SAMANTHA IS!” I can’t remember the other stuff I said but, it boiled down to “Because I said so” and “Come get me immediately if you get into another fight with a girl”.
I do remember planting a “toy” ho* in one boy’s head for bugging the ever-loving snot outta’ me. He steered a wide path around me after that.
*This was back when toy tools had metal parts.
229 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:58:52am |
re: #222 Alouette
Some banned lizard posted crap on my blog, bashing Charles, when he knew that it was Rosh Hashanah and I could not delete blog comments. It’s gone now.
Charles probably has a callous on his delete finger after this weekend.
230 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:59:18am |
re: #222 Alouette
Some banned lizard posted crap on my blog, bashing Charles, when he knew that it was Rosh Hashanah and I could not delete blog comments. It’s gone now.
Now, that’s the very definition of “chicken-shit.”
231 | razorbacker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:59:22am |
Well, that’s most of my hour today.
I’d best get stirring and begin the day.
Got a small trip planned for this week, so I’ll be gone for a bit.
‘Bye.
232 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 4:59:53am |
re: #223 razorbacker
So I hear. You would have been known as a weak sister indeed, had you needed to settle arguments with a gun.
But, times change, I reckon.
It’s a different culture.
235 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:04:41am |
re: #222 Alouette
Some banned lizard posted crap on my blog, bashing Charles, when he knew that it was Rosh Hashanah and I could not delete blog comments. It’s gone now.
You rock, Alouette. Happy New Year to you and yours.
236 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:05:07am |
re: #234 MandyManners
We’ve hit 9 on the Grumble Scale.
Sounds like my house. Just got back from a mini-vacation for my first wedding anniversary. Getting out of bed at 6:00 this AM was _not_ what I had in mind.
238 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:09:13am |
re: #236 thedopefishlives
Sounds like my house. Just got back from a mini-vacation for my first wedding anniversary. Getting out of bed at 6:00 this AM was _not_ what I had in mind.
Heck, I’ve been up for three hours.
239 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:10:06am |
re: #238 MandyManners
Heck, I’ve been up for three hours.
Oh, I’ve been up for over an hour now. But compared to relaxing in a hotel room, this bites the big one.
240 | Vicious Babushka Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:11:32am |
re: #238 MandyManners
Heck, I’ve been up for three hours.
I’ve been up for ten hours. Of course I am on Israel time. :)
241 | songbird Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:12:58am |
Good morning, Lizards! How is life?
A friend of mine sent me this cartoon from 1934. Rather telling!
242 | songbird Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:14:03am |
What’s been going on that folks have been deleted? I’ve been out of the loop with limited internets.
243 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:15:14am |
re: #242 songbird
What’s been going on that folks have been deleted? I’ve been out of the loop with limited internets.
They chose to flounce.
244 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:16:24am |
re: #242 songbird
Since your internets got limited… they have lost their will to live and jumped off of the Tallahatchee Bridge…
245 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:16:46am |
Romney just said that Jimmy Carter is losing touch.
246 | songbird Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:17:08am |
re: #244 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Since your internets got limited… they have lost their will to live and jumped off of the Tallahatchee Bridge…
I’m…flattered?
247 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:17:53am |
Fox is playing the Stephanopolous tape in which he whipped out the dictionary to read a definition of tax and FCBBHO chastized him.
Things are not what they are. They are what FCBBHO says they are.
249 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:19:15am |
re: #241 songbird
There weren’t any regulations to prevent that sort of thing from happening, and the only thing that ended up saving the economy was the war. Huh.
250 | songbird Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:19:59am |
re: #248 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
teehee…
BTW, we did make it to the Hard Times Cafe in Frederick you recommended.
Decent Chili, nice atmosphere. I like the vegetarian chili best as I like a sweeter chili. They even opened up one in Hagerstown.
251 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:21:09am |
re: #239 thedopefishlives
Oh, I’ve been up for over an hour now. But compared to relaxing in a hotel room, this bites the big one.
Just about anything bites the big one in comparison to kicking back in a hotel room.
252 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:21:17am |
re: #246 songbird
Nah, people are just too stupid to delete LGF from their favorites and go away… Charles has turned into an Obama supporting, Beck hating, Liberal embracing, Christian despising, Radical loving, Islamic Jihad abiding, etc… and they want to go away, but they think they have to tell us.
253 | Vicious Babushka Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:21:33am |
re: #241 songbird
Good morning, Lizards! How is life?
A friend of mine sent me this cartoon from 1934. Rather telling!
Plus ça change, plus c’ést la même chose.
254 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:21:46am |
re: #240 Alouette
I’ve been up for ten hours. Of course I am on Israel time. :)
Whatever happened to American Jewess in Israel? I’ve not seen her for ages and ages.
256 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:22:14am |
re: #250 songbird
Love their vegetarian chili. I buy the mix when I am there and take it home and make it myself. $3.50 a pack. Sweet!
258 | songbird Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:22:21am |
re: #249 laZardo
There weren’t any regulations to prevent that sort of thing from happening, and the only thing that ended up saving the economy was the war. Huh.
Unfortunately, Congress is working within ‘regulations’ as they enjoy spending our hard earned money.
Mr. Songbird and I are very concerned about the wisdom (or lack thereof) of Congress and our President as this year progresses.
259 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:22:59am |
re: #247 MandyManners
Fox is playing the Stephanopolous tape in which he whipped out the dictionary to read a definition of tax and FCBBHO chastized him.
Things are not what they are. They are what FCBBHO says they are.
Wow. I wish I coulda seen that one. Talk about alternate reality.
260 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:25:07am |
Well, it’s time for me to “race” out of here.
Laters, gators.
261 | songbird Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:25:19am |
re: #252 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Nah, people are just too stupid to delete LGF from their favorites and go away… Charles has turned into an Obama supporting, Beck hating, Liberal embracing, Christian despising, Radical loving, Islamic Jihad abiding, etc… and they want to go away, but they think they have to tell us.
Fascinating. We bloggers are a communicative bunch anyways!
I had a message from my sister, also a lizard, that a LOT of regulars had been banned - including some of the favorites. Just was wondering what happened.
262 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:30:20am |
re: #258 songbird
Perhaps the excessive spending does deserve its fair bit of oversight. But in an economy more globally interconnected than ever, one wonders if they really didn’t have a choice.
263 | irish rose Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:33:44am |
Good morning, lizards.
I’m sick as a dog this morning, and I have a long list of things that must be done.
It’s gonna be one of those days.
264 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:34:22am |
re: #263 irish rose
Good morning, lizards.
I’m sick as a dog this morning, and I have a long list of things that must be done.
It’s gonna be one of those days.
Swine flu?
/
265 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:35:10am |
266 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:36:34am |
re: #265 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Potato famine?
Bottle flu? (very popular in the restaurant industry, BTW)
/
267 | FemNaziBitch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:37:59am |
Hey Morning Lizards!
It’s drizzly and grey in m part of the world, and a little cooler. Finally like Fall.
How are you-all this early morning?
268 | FemNaziBitch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:38:26am |
re: #263 irish rose
Good morning, lizards.
I’m sick as a dog this morning, and I have a long list of things that must be done.
It’s gonna be one of those days.
(irish rose)
269 | irish rose Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:38:51am |
No, I have serious health issues that are exacerbated by stress.
Doc is ordering me to slow down.
I can cut down on the list, but the shopping isn’t going to do itself.
271 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:39:23am |
Good morning lizards.
Hope you fell better irish.
Has anybody heard from realwest?
272 | Vicious Babushka Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:39:44am |
I did a Daylife image search on Jerusalem, hoping to find some pictures of Jews praying at the Kotel on Rosh Hashanah.
I did not find any. Guess what I found instead? A whole bunch of pictures of Muslims seething against Israel all over the world.
/what media bias?
273 | irish rose Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:39:52am |
re: #271 VioletTiger
Good morning lizards.
Hope you fell better irish.Has anybody heard from realwest?
I think he was here a couple of days ago?
274 | FemNaziBitch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:40:20am |
275 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:40:26am |
re: #271 VioletTiger
Good morning lizards.
Hope you fell better irish.Has anybody heard from realwest?
I think someone got an email from him over the weekend. Can’t remember who.
276 | FemNaziBitch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:41:08am |
re: #270 laZardo
Laughing at other people’s misery.
/and you?
Hangin’ in there. Not used to being up and mobile this time of day. On my second cuppa. Thanks gor askin’!
277 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:41:55am |
re: #267 ggt
Hey Morning Lizards!
It’s drizzly and grey in m part of the world, and a little cooler. Finally like Fall.
How are you-all this early morning?
It’s bright and sunny here in the wild north country. The Indian summer is in full swing - it was 81 degrees when I got home from my vacation yesterday afternoon.
278 | FemNaziBitch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:42:10am |
re: #273 irish rose
I think he was here a couple of days ago?
Someone got a reply email from him the other day. He is hangin’ in there —back on chemo.
He hasn’t responded to my email, so I am still kinda worried. Chances are he just didn’t see it yet.
279 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:42:21am |
re: #263 irish rose
Good morning, lizards.
I’m sick as a dog this morning, and I have a long list of things that must be done.
Good Morning, Rose. Sorry to hear you’re under the weather and can’t even rest. Did you attend and/or play at the Muskegon Irish Music festival this weekend?
280 | FemNaziBitch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:43:23am |
re: #269 irish rose
No, I have serious health issues that are exacerbated by stress.
Doc is ordering me to slow down.I can cut down on the list, but the shopping isn’t going to do itself.
shopping ALWAYS makes me feel better. Just be sure to buy something for yourself! Even if it costs $1.
281 | FemNaziBitch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:44:41am |
What happened to the LGF blog links? I can’t seem to find them anymore and I wanted to do some surfing this am.
282 | irish rose Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:46:43am |
re: #279 Spenser (with an S)
Good Morning, Rose. Sorry to hear you’re under the weather and can’t even rest. Did you attend and/or play at the Muskegon Irish Music festival this weekend?
Not this year, I was a paid musician down at the Michigan Renaissance Festival.
283 | irish rose Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:47:20am |
re: #280 ggt
shopping ALWAYS makes me feel better. Just be sure to buy something for yourself! Even if it costs $1.
That’s good advice, I think I’ll take it ;).
284 | Sharmuta Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:47:38am |
re: #281 ggt
What happened to the LGF blog links? I can’t seem to find them anymore and I wanted to do some surfing this am.
The blogroll is listed under Tools/Info in the left side bar.
285 | freetoken Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:49:04am |
re: #272 Alouette
Well, the pictures on that site are those that have been submitted for news pictures… so unless there was some news associated with what you are searching you might be disappointed.
Here is a search for jerusalem Rosh Hashanah
286 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:50:11am |
re: #282 irish rose
Not this year, I was a paid musician down at the Michigan Renaissance Festival.
Paid is good.
287 | FemNaziBitch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:50:41am |
re: #285 freetoken
Well, the pictures on that site are those that have been submitted for news pictures… so unless there was some news associated with what you are searching you might be disappointed.
Here is a search for jerusalem Rosh Hashanah
Thanks!
288 | VioletTiger Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:51:35am |
re: #96 MandyManners
[Link: video.yahoo.com…]
Okay now my cats all have their fur a ‘frizz after hearing that.
289 | Vicious Babushka Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:51:55am |
re: #285 freetoken
Well, the pictures on that site are those that have been submitted for news pictures… so unless there was some news associated with what you are searching you might be disappointed.
Here is a search for jerusalem Rosh Hashanah
There are only 11 pictures in that selection and they are all from last week!
290 | Vicious Babushka Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:54:47am |
Image search for Rosh Hashanah has a better selection, including some of U.S. soldiers praying at a base in Baghdad.
291 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:55:20am |
To thine own self be true.
— William Shakespeare, Polonius in “Hamlet”
Anyone else remember when the castaways on Gilligan’s Island mounted a musical production of “Hamlet”?
292 | FemNaziBitch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:58:14am |
Different types of non-governmental organizations:
Apart from “NGO”, often alternative terms are used as for example: independent sector, volunteer sector, civil society, grassroots organizations, transnational social movement organizations, private voluntary organizations, self-help organizations and non-state actors (NSA’s).
Non-governmental organizations are a heterogeneous group. A long list of acronyms has developed around the term “NGO”.
These include:
BINGO is short for business-oriented international NGO, or big international NGO;
CSO, short for civil society organization;
DONGO: Donor Organized NGO;
ENGO: short for environmental NGO, such as Global 2000;
GONGOs are government-operated NGOs, which may have been set up by governments to look like NGOs in order to qualify for outside aid or promote the interests of the government in question;
INGO stands for international NGO; Education charter international is an international NGO
QUANGOs are quasi-autonomous non-governmental organizations, such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (The ISO is actually not purely an NGO, since its membership is by nation, and each nation is represented by what the ISO Council determines to be the ‘most broadly representative’ standardization body of a nation. That body might itself be a nongovernmental organization; for example, the United States is represented in ISO by the American National Standards Institute, which is independent of the federal government. However, other countries can be represented by national governmental agencies; this is the trend in Europe.)
TANGO: short for technical assistance NGO;
GSO: Grassroots Support Organization
MANGO: short for market advocacy NGO
293 | Throbert McGee Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:59:03am |
re: #177 Sharmuta
The investigation concluded it wasn’t racially motivated.
Sharm, if it had been a black kid getting beaten up by two white kids on a bus filled mostly with white students, and the police spokesperson said that the attack wasn’t racially motivated and was more about “bullies telling people where they could sit,” would you have taken the spokescop’s word for it, or would something have smelled a bit fishy to you?
If Rush had ONE valid point to make, it was to draw attention to the double standard that was possibly at work here. But unfortunately, since he’s ratings-driven gasbag, he couldn’t resist throwing in unnecessarily hyperbolic language appealing to white fears of black violence.
294 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:01:48am |
re: #293 Throbert McGee
On an off-topic note, I noticed what you did with your avatar. 0:
295 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:04:29am |
296 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:09:38am |
re: #197 MandyManners
I’m reminded of the little boys at the park a while back who taunted The Kid for being white and who refused to give me his football, one opting instead to call me a “white cracker bitch”. He’s young enough to be merely parrotting what he’s heard at home.
At what age are kids to be held responsible for their words?
297 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:12:42am |
re: #296 JamesTKirk
If they’re old enough to be recorded on YouTube for internet humiliation, then yeah, they should be pretty damn responsible.
298 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:13:01am |
re: #245 MandyManners
Romney just said that Jimmy Carter is losing touch.
What other news from the 1970s can he give us?
299 | Danny Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:13:59am |
Morning scaly people.
Throbert, you make a good point about the bus incident, I think. Last I read (Sept 19), the investigation is still on-going. I’m waiting for more info myself.
300 | John Neverbend Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:17:52am |
In an earlier thread a few days ago, there was the impressively stupid discussion about the banana’s being designed by God. Yesterday, I was scouring the internet for videos of Jerry Coyne, and I came across this:
Jerry Coyne at Rockefeller University
This was given in May, 2008, and he actually starts with the banana video. Tomorrow is D(awkins)-Day when his magnum opus should reach the shelves of US book sellers.
301 | Danny Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:21:10am |
re: #300 John Neverbend
So far my favorite Dawkins book is The Blind Watchmaker. Do you think the new one will be better?
302 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:21:54am |
When is a tax not a tax? When Obama says so, that’s when.
303 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:25:29am |
When Congress gave away $3 billion for buyers to trade in their “clunkers” and buy new cars in August, lawmakers thrilled as buyers swamped showrooms to take advantage of the big discounts. “Cash for clunkers has captured the public’s attention … (it) has the possibility to truly jumpstart our economy,” said Rep. Candice Miller (R., Mich.). Other, more sober analysts, warned that the clunkers program was only stealing from future sales.
September sales are in, and sobriety can take a bow.
Edmunds.com reports that “September’s light-vehicle sales rate will fall to 8.8 million units … the lowest rate in nearly 28 years, tying the worst demand on record. After the cash-for-clunkers program boosted August sales to their first year-over-year increase since October 2007, demand has plunged. In at least the last 33 years, the U.S. seasonally adjusted annual rate has only dropped as low as 8.8 million units once — in December 1981 — with records stretching back to January 1976.”
“Many people regard February as the darkest month of the recession, but even then (sales were) higher, at 9.1 million units,” adds Edmunds.com statistician Zhenwei Zhou.
But sobriety comes hard for Washington. Now NHTSA says that, despite burdening manufacturers with $60 billion in new costs, its new 35.5 mpg fuel mandate will stimulate the economy by boosting auto sales by 65,480 vehicles through 2016 because Washington “expects stronger consumer demand for fuel-efficient models.” Sure.
304 | Desert Dog Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:28:58am |
re: #303 Pianobuff
When Congress gave away $3 billion for buyers to trade in their “clunkers” and buy new cars in August, lawmakers thrilled as buyers swamped showrooms to take advantage of the big discounts. “Cash for clunkers has captured the public’s attention … (it) has the possibility to truly jumpstart our economy,” said Rep. Candice Miller (R., Mich.). Other, more sober analysts, warned that the clunkers program was only stealing from future sales.
September sales are in, and sobriety can take a bow.
Edmunds.com reports that “September’s light-vehicle sales rate will fall to 8.8 million units … the lowest rate in nearly 28 years, tying the worst demand on record. After the cash-for-clunkers program boosted August sales to their first year-over-year increase since October 2007, demand has plunged. In at least the last 33 years, the U.S. seasonally adjusted annual rate has only dropped as low as 8.8 million units once — in December 1981 — with records stretching back to January 1976.”
“Many people regard February as the darkest month of the recession, but even then (sales were) higher, at 9.1 million units,” adds Edmunds.com statistician Zhenwei Zhou.
But sobriety comes hard for Washington. Now NHTSA says that, despite burdening manufacturers with $60 billion in new costs, its new 35.5 mpg fuel mandate will stimulate the economy by boosting auto sales by 65,480 vehicles through 2016 because Washington “expects stronger consumer demand for fuel-efficient models.” Sure.
Details, details, my friend…Cash for Clunkers was a masterstroke of feelgoodism AND it helped saved Mother Earth too. How can you be against that? Are you are Nazi or something?
305 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:31:23am |
re: #304 Desert Dog
Details, details, my friend…Cash for Clunkers was a masterstroke of feelgoodism AND it helped saved Mother Earth too. How can you be against that? Are you are Nazi or something?
I know, I know. I’m out of step with the program. What can I say?
306 | Flyers1974 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:31:44am |
re: #293 Throbert McGee
Sharm, if it had been a black kid getting beaten up by two white kids on a bus filled mostly with white students, and the police spokesperson said that the attack wasn’t racially motivated and was more about “bullies telling people where they could sit,” would you have taken the spokescop’s word for it, or would something have smelled a bit fishy to you?
If Rush had ONE valid point to make, it was to draw attention to the double standard that was possibly at work here. But unfortunately, since he’s ratings-driven gasbag, he couldn’t resist throwing in unnecessarily hyperbolic language appealing to white fears of black violence.
Starting his rant with “in Barak Obama’s America” made it pretty clear he had no interest in making valid points.
307 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:33:07am |
re: #303 Pianobuff
The devil is in the details.
Or, in this case, plowing through the entrance of the Detroit Auto Show.
308 | Desert Dog Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:34:07am |
re: #302 Pianobuff
When is a tax not a tax? When Obama says so, that’s when.
Requiring everyone to buy insurance will impose a massive tax on all who now are uninsured. The Congressional Budget Office projects that it would force the middle-income uninsured to pay on average more than 15 percent of their income.
The poor will still have Medicaid. But for those earning more, the required premiums will be worse than any tax increase. For example, CBO estimates that when the program is fully implemented — by 2016 — an individual earning $32,400 a year would have to pay $4,100 in premiums before getting any subsidy. With deductibles and co-payments, he’d have to shell out $5,600 a year, or 17.3 percent of his income. A family of four, making $80,000 a year, would have to pay about $10,500 in premiums alone — with deductibles and co-payments, up to $15,000 or just under 20 percent of income.
309 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:34:55am |
re: #307 laZardo
The devil is in the details.
Or, in this case, plowing through the entrance of the Detroit Auto Show.
Carpocalypse? LOL
310 | Desert Dog Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:35:03am |
re: #306 Flyers1974
Starting his rant with “in Barak Obama’s America” made it pretty clear he had no interest in making valid points.
That’s just a play on Ted Kennedy’s character assassination of Robert Bork.
311 | badger1970 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:36:10am |
Obama: We Need To Bail Out Newspapers Or Blogs Will Run The World
Obama yesterday expressed concern at the sorry state of the news industry and said that he will look at a news paper bailout, because otherwise, blogs will take over the world, and that qwould be a threat to democracy, The Hill reports.
“I am concerned that if the direction of the news is all blogosphere, all opinions, with no serious fact-checking, no serious attempts to put stories in context, that what you will end up getting is people shouting at each other across the void but not a lot of mutual understanding,” he said
I guess we can only handle spoon-fed information by columnists and unable to think for ourselves. Why not, we the people have already bailed out the credit car, mortgage, and auto industry. Why not another private enterprise?
312 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:36:16am |
re: #308 Desert Dog
The poor will still have Medicaid. But for those earning more, the required premiums will be worse than any tax increase. For example, CBO estimates that when the program is fully implemented — by 2016 — an individual earning $32,400 a year would have to pay $4,100 in premiums before getting any subsidy. With deductibles and co-payments, he’d have to shell out $5,600 a year, or 17.3 percent of his income. A family of four, making $80,000 a year, would have to pay about $10,500 in premiums alone — with deductibles and co-payments, up to $15,000 or just under 20 percent of income.
And in the last 24 hours, I have not heard ONE single explanation as to how this is NOT a anything but a tax.
Can anyone give me the “official line?”
313 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:36:29am |
re: #310 Desert Dog
That’s just a play on Ted Kennedy’s character assassination of Robert Bork.
The one launched 45 minutes after the Bork nomination?
314 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:36:35am |
re: #310 Desert Dog
That’s just a play on Ted Kennedy’s character assassination of Robert Bork.
“In ________’s America” is a figure of speech that has been around for decades if not longer.
315 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:37:09am |
re: #311 badger1970
Obama: We Need To Bail Out Newspapers Or Blogs Will Run The World
I guess we can only handle spoon-fed information by columnists and unable to think for ourselves. Why not, we the people have already bailed out the credit car, mortgage, and auto industry. Why not another private enterprise?
I guess he doesn’t read LGF, no fact checking my eye.
316 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:37:47am |
re: #315 Walter L. Newton
I guess he doesn’t read LGF, no fact checking my eye.
What’s funny is that he thinks the newspapers DO have fact checking.
317 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:37:55am |
318 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:38:02am |
re: #312 Walter L. Newton
And in the last 24 hours, I have not heard ONE single explanation as to how this is NOT a anything but a tax.
Can anyone give me the “official line?”
I’m not sure of the “whole” official line, but I know part of it is something like…Well the premium increases you would otherwise get from your private insurance carrier would be like a tax increase too so what’s the diff?
319 | Desert Dog Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:38:05am |
re: #312 Walter L. Newton
And in the last 24 hours, I have not heard ONE single explanation as to how this is NOT a anything but a tax.
Can anyone give me the “official line?”
And, Walter, this is compulsory. You MUST pay this, or face fines from the IRS of an equal amount. This is more than a TAX, it’s legalized government theft.
320 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:38:22am |
Returning from an amazing weekend of camping here. Went with 16 guys from church and we kayaked and mountain biked, fished and golfed. My ass hurts. I brought my mountain bike which has never really gotten mud in its treads but I thought I would bring it even though kayaking was what I was really going for. Peer pressure from some 30 year old mountain bike racers kicked in and I said “sure, sounds fun”. They had been going for 12 miles already so I thought I would be ok. Wrong. 3 miles of rutty, uphill switchbacks as I sucked for air and terrifying downhill runs with jagged branches flying past my head later, I was finished. Now that I survived, it was fun. Did I mention my ass hurts? We ate fresh-caught salmon and steaks and drank beers and just had a great time.
321 | badger1970 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:38:57am |
re: #314 JamesTKirk
It didn’t matter who was nominated, Kennedy had it written like a Mad-Lib, just insert the proper noun.
322 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:39:03am |
re: #316 JamesTKirk
What’s funny is that he thinks the newspapers DO have fact checking.
Funny how you can title an article “fact check” and suddenly people give it more credibility. Modern branding, gotta love it.
323 | FemNaziBitch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:39:25am |
re: #319 Desert Dog
And, Walter, this is compulsory. You MUST pay this, or face fines from the IRS of an equal amount. This is more than a TAX, it’s legalized government theft.
I still don’t understand how this helps poor people —at least with the current logic.
325 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:39:40am |
re: #317 MandyManners
Happy Birthday, Bill!
Do you think this would be a good birthday present for Bill Murray?
326 | Desert Dog Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:39:44am |
re: #320 Spenser (with an S)
Returning from an amazing weekend of camping here. Went with 16 guys from church and we kayaked and mountain biked, fished and golfed. My ass hurts. I brought my mountain bike which has never really gotten mud in its treads but I thought I would bring it even though kayaking was what I was really going for. Peer pressure from some 30 year old mountain bike racers kicked in and I said “sure, sounds fun”. They had been going for 12 miles already so I thought I would be ok. Wrong. 3 miles of rutty, uphill switchbacks as I sucked for air and terrifying downhill runs with jagged branches flying past my head later, I was finished. Now that I survived, it was fun. Did I mention my ass hurts? We ate fresh-caught salmon and steaks and drank beers and just had a great time.
Nice!
328 | Desert Dog Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:40:34am |
329 | FemNaziBitch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:40:45am |
re: #322 Pianobuff
Funny how you can title an article “fact check” and suddenly people give it more credibility. Modern branding, gotta love it.
and “editors”. They main argument against blogs by the MSMocrats is that blogs do not have “editors”. My thoughts are that it might be nice to read what the actual journalists write without the intervention of “editors.”
330 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:41:41am |
re: #318 Pianobuff
I’m not sure of the “whole” official line, but I know part of it is something like…Well the premium increases you would otherwise get from your private insurance carrier would be like a tax increase too so what’s the diff?
Difference is I don’t HAVE to have health insurance right now. I heard a similar argument just now on the radio, that car insurance is mandatory, so it’s the same thing.
If you hear that one, remind anyone who tell you that that CAR OWNERSHIP IS NOT MANDATORY.
Big difference.
There is currently not a single “fee” for being an American citizen, this opens the door to that. And once that door is open, you watch what happens.
331 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:41:52am |
re: #320 Spenser (with an S)
Returning from an amazing weekend of camping… Went with 16 guys from church… My ass hurts… Peer pressure from some 30 year old… Now that I survived, it was fun. Did I mention my ass hurts?
Do we need the sordid details of your weekend?
332 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:41:58am |
re: #311 badger1970
Obama: We Need To Bail Out Newspapers Or Blogs Will Run The World
I guess we can only handle spoon-fed information by columnists and unable to think for ourselves. Why not, we the people have already bailed out the credit car, mortgage, and auto industry. Why not another private enterprise?
I wonder much influence Mark Lloyd will have in this. Sure, he’s the diversity officer at the FCC, but he has a history of wanting to “reform” the media.
333 | badger1970 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:42:37am |
re: #328 Desert Dog
Didn’t see a need for zoom. That’s pretty much in one’s face.
334 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:42:56am |
335 | Desert Dog Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:43:11am |
re: #327 laZardo
Yep. It’s their long-running article series. I just hope there’ll be something fun for me to drive when I age out of the exorbitant youth auto-insurance bracket apart from, say…something like this.
Here’s a new model from Obama Motors. It is good for the environment and it give health benefits to the operator…two birds with one stone!
New GM gas save model
336 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:43:35am |
re: #310 Desert Dog
That’s just a play on Ted Kennedy’s character assassination of Robert Bork.
Good call.
337 | Cannadian Club Akbar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:43:40am |
338 | Spider Mensch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:43:48am |
re: #320 Spenser (with an S)
Returning from an amazing weekend of camping here. Went with 16 guys from church and we kayaked and mountain biked, fished and golfed. My ass hurts. I brought my mountain bike which has never really gotten mud in its treads but I thought I would bring it even though kayaking was what I was really going for. Peer pressure from some 30 year old mountain bike racers kicked in and I said “sure, sounds fun”. They had been going for 12 miles already so I thought I would be ok. Wrong. 3 miles of rutty, uphill switchbacks as I sucked for air and terrifying downhill runs with jagged branches flying past my head later, I was finished. Now that I survived, it was fun. Did I mention my ass hurts? We ate fresh-caught salmon and steaks and drank beers and just had a great time.
I think I saw that movie..”BrokeBack Deliverance”..some guys ass hurt in that too, but I think for different reasons? maybe..? err..I hope…err nevermind…:0
/just joking of course :)
339 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:44:34am |
re: #331 JamesTKirk
Do we need the sordid details of your weekend?
How did know you would pick up on that? I thought if I put that part right after the mountain-biking to explain it you would let it pass. Get your mind out of the gutter.
///
341 | FemNaziBitch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:45:13am |
I need to take my early morning nap.
Have a great day all!
342 | Vicious Babushka Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:45:25am |
re: #335 Desert Dog
Here’s a new model from Obama Motors. It is good for the environment and it give health benefits to the operator…two birds with one stone!
New GM gas save model
MSRP $599,999 (after they get done putting in all the safety features, seat belts, air bags, infant-left-in-car-seat alarm, etc.)
343 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:45:25am |
HAH…
My girlfriend was “googling” my name last night and came up with a whole bunch of LGF stalker sites where my name has come up.
The funniest one said “Charles and his sycophant Walter L. Newton.”
Charles need to upgrade to a better quality of sycophant around here.
LOL.
/
344 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:45:30am |
345 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:45:40am |
re: #330 Walter L. Newton
Difference is I don’t HAVE to have health insurance right now. I heard a similar argument just now on the radio, that car insurance is mandatory, so it’s the same thing.
If you hear that one, remind anyone who tell you that that CAR OWNERSHIP IS NOT MANDATORY.
Big difference.
There is currently not a single “fee” for being an American citizen, this opens the door to that. And once that door is open, you watch what happens.
You don’t have to convince me. I’m in agreement. Just trying to respond to your query with a summary of how Obama answered.
346 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:45:50am |
re: #339 Spenser (with an S)
Get your mind out of the gutter.
Are you kidding? Did you see my post in reaction to Bill Murray’s birthday? I’m not leaving the gutter any time soon.
347 | John Neverbend Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:45:59am |
re: #301 Danny
So far my favorite Dawkins book is The Blind Watchmaker. Do you think the new one will be better?
I suspect it’s not comparable. One of the reviewers on Youtube (djarm67) gives a very detailed summary and reminds the viewer that the purpose of the new book is somewhat different. This time, a huge amount of supporting evidence for the underlying theory is provided. The problem is that the sheer volume of evidence is so great that you can’t get it all into one book, and inevitably Dawkins had to choose some items at the expense of others. For example, he apparently does not include the evidence for the fusing of two ancestral chromosomes in human chromosome 2 (which would suggest that the common ancestor of apes and humans had 24 chromosome pairs, two of which fused together in the human genome).
348 | Johnnyreb Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:46:40am |
re: #303 Pianobuff
A bunch of people on here said that was exactly what was going to happen. The car dealers around me are all bitching about not having any buyers and they are going to have to let sales staff go. But just a few short weeks ago they were all aglow and talking about record sales and the government will keep extending the program because the economy is so bad, blah, blah.
People with a modicum of common sense saw that program was going to be a train wreck of epic proportions. The government never fails to fail when they try and dabble in the private sector.
349 | Flyers1974 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:46:40am |
re: #310 Desert Dog
That’s just a play on Ted Kennedy’s character assassination of Robert Bork.
Good morning, DD. You are referring to “in R. Bork’s America (back ally abortions, etc…, ) or something along those lines? I can believe the connection, but to follow that introduction with the school bus story, considering the complete lack of cause and effect, considering that racial issues have been in the news as they were re: the DC tea party and Carter, I can’t believe that was mere clever word-play.
350 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:46:40am |
re: #343 Walter L. Newton
HAH…
My girlfriend was “googling” my name last night and came up with a whole bunch of LGF stalker sites where my name has come up.
The funniest one said “Charles and his sycophant Walter L. Newton.”
Charles need to upgrade to a better quality of sycophant around here.
LOL.
/
Yet another reason not to use your real name. Mine is plastered all over usenet from the 90s, but I’ve used aliases ever since.
351 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:47:12am |
re: #346 JamesTKirk
It’s nice to see that there’s at least one poster on this elitist right-wing site that’s in touch with the people at the bottom of the societal ladder.
/ q;
352 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:47:18am |
re: #331 JamesTKirk
Do we need the sordid details of your weekend?
I resisted. I figured it would be too much for you.
353 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:47:25am |
354 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:47:28am |
re: #345 Pianobuff
You don’t have to convince me. I’m in agreement. Just trying to respond to your query with a summary of how Obama answered.
No, I was only trying to pass on some “speaking points” about this. I wouldn’t ever think you would be waving the flag for this.
But really, I just heard a progressive on the radio try to equate this with car insurance. Like I say, there is no law requiring you to own a car, ergo, no law to demand that you have car insurance.
355 | Danny Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:47:29am |
re: #350 JamesTKirk
Yet another reason not to use your real name.
Or at least spell it backwards. That’s what I did.
356 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:47:52am |
re: #339 Spenser (with an S)
How did know you would pick up on that? I thought if I put that part right after the mountain-biking to explain it you would let it pass. Get your mind out of the gutter.
///
Where would he put it?
357 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:48:09am |
re: #348 Johnnyreb
A bunch of people on here said that was exactly what was going to happen. The car dealers around me are all bitching about not having any buyers and they are going to have to let sales staff go. But just a few short weeks ago they were all aglow and talking about record sales and the government will keep extending the program because the economy is so bad, blah, blah.
People with a modicum of common sense saw that program was going to be a train wreck of epic proportions. The government never fails to fail when they try and dabble in the private sector.
They should make Cal Worthington the car czar.
358 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:48:41am |
re: #351 laZardo
It’s nice to see that there’s at least one poster on this elitist right-wing site that’s in touch with the people at the bottom of the societal ladder.
/ q;
I’m not the only one here in touch with the bottom. At least mine doesn’t hurt.
359 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:49:00am |
360 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:49:03am |
361 | Locker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:49:06am |
re: #354 Walter L. Newton
No, I was only trying to pass on some “speaking points” about this. I wouldn’t ever think you would be waving the flag for this.
But really, I just heard a progressive on the radio try to equate this with car insurance. Like I say, there is no law requiring you to own a car, ergo, no law to demand that you have car insurance.
True but you do have to have insurance for a car if you own one. And you do own a body…
362 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:49:11am |
Wow, I just read Shugs’ flounce.
Shug is one of the lizards who helped me get out to SD to see my son off on his first deployment… pretty damned sad.
It makes me ill to see otherwise intelligent people like Shug minimize the importance of intellectual honesty, look the other way in the face of extremist behavior, and attack Charles for being anti-religious which is a damnable lie.
I maintain hope that eventually, some of these people will come to their senses.
363 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:49:13am |
re: #358 JamesTKirk
I’m not the only one here in touch with the bottom. At least mine doesn’t hurt.
In bed? Good for you.
/ D:
364 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:49:39am |
re: #355 Danny
Or at least spell it backwards. That’s what I did.
So… Your name is Ynnad? Is that Welsh?
365 | rwdflynavy Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:49:44am |
FBV,
Your story of getting beat up in your youth reminded me of my time in Kingsville Texas.
I was the only white kid dumb enough not to skip school on “Beat up Gringo Day”.
Good times!!
366 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:49:52am |
re: #355 Danny
Or at least spell it backwards. That’s what I did.
Hi, Ynnad.
Do I pronounce it “whine nad” or “why nad”?
367 | badger1970 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:50:39am |
re: #357 Pianobuff
“Buy a car now or I’ll club this seal!”- commercial from “UHF”
368 | HoosierHoops Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:50:49am |
Good Morning Lizards!
It’s my birthday today..Woo-hoo!
369 | Danny Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:51:01am |
re: #366 MandyManners
Hi, Ynnad.
Do I pronounce it “whine nad” or “why nad”?
My friends call me Nads for short.
370 | Vicious Babushka Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:51:02am |
re: #343 Walter L. Newton
HAH…
My girlfriend was “googling” my name last night and came up with a whole bunch of LGF stalker sites where my name has come up.
The funniest one said “Charles and his sycophant Walter L. Newton.”
Charles need to upgrade to a better quality of sycophant around here.
LOL.
/
Charles should appoint a Sycophant Czar.
371 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:51:08am |
re: #330 Walter L. Newton
Difference is I don’t HAVE to have health insurance right now. I heard a similar argument just now on the radio, that car insurance is mandatory, so it’s the same thing.
If you hear that one, remind anyone who tell you that that CAR OWNERSHIP IS NOT MANDATORY.
Big difference.
There is currently not a single “fee” for being an American citizen, this opens the door to that. And once that door is open, you watch what happens.
And mandatory car insurance protects others from damage you do with your car. It is required so that other people don’t lose money due to your actions.
372 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:51:20am |
re: #368 HoosierHoops
Good Morning Lizards!
It’s my birthday today..Woo-hoo!
Happy Birthday, Mister Murray, sir!
373 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:51:20am |
re: #332 MandyManners
I wonder much influence Mark Lloyd will have in this. Sure, he’s the diversity officer at the FCC, but he has a history of wanting to “reform” the media.
Rasmussen is already polling this. From today’s daily tracking poll:
“The President recently said he is open to considering the idea of giving tax breaks to struggling newspapers. Thirty-seven percent (37%) of American adults say it would be better to provide some federal subsidies rather than let the newspapers go out of business. However, only 17% favor a government bailout of the newspaper industry.
In fact, just 25% even favor the creation of a White House commission to help find ways for struggling news organizations survive. “
374 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:51:51am |
re: #369 Danny
My friends call me Nads for short.
A real man would not use the words “my” “nads” and “short” in the same sentence.
375 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:52:07am |
re: #361 Locker
True but you do have to have insurance for a car if you own one. And you do own a body…
That’s sarc, right?
376 | HoosierHoops Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:52:32am |
re: #372 JamesTKirk
Happy Birthday, Mister Murray, sir!
Oh yea..I should call Bill Murray on his cell.. I’ll bet he knows beyonce..It’s party time Billy Boy!
377 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:52:48am |
re: #375 Pianobuff
That’s sarc, right?
Must be. If this passes, the government will own our bodies, not us.
379 | FrogMarch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:53:37am |
Good day all.
This is an interesting take on CA’s problems.
California must go bankrupt
The only salvation from the inevitable is the inevitable
The only real solution to save California from the inevitable actually is the inevitable: Declare bankruptcy, and reset the system.
What will then emerge will be as important as the process and recovery. We will finally get to see, as the saga unfolds, what we saw in the city of Vallejo, Calif., during its bankruptcy proceedings — a pattern of corruption, cronyism, abuse and the defrauding of the taxpaying public. City officials making more than $300,000 a year, firemen making more than $200,000, friends hiring friends.
Government work should be a refuge, not a gold mine.
California is being broken by its own government, state and local. You can see it when you live in other states.
380 | Locker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:54:03am |
re: #371 Kosh’s Shadow
And mandatory car insurance protects others from damage you do with your car. It is required so that other people don’t lose money due to your actions.
Well I can see health insurance as protection for others as well as that person if you consider money. If you have no primary care and end up having a triple bypass via the emergency room and either it’s paid for with a tax funded thing or the hospital jacks it’s rates up on you to cover the uninsured. Just trying to see the angle.
381 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:54:27am |
382 | Locker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:54:32am |
383 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:55:15am |
re: #361 Locker
True but you do have to have insurance for a car if you own one. And you do own a body…
There is NO LAW REQUIRING ME TO OWN A CAR. This idea that has been floated will REQUIRE me to purchase something whether I want it or not. It will be a requirement for ALL CITIZENS.
You ok with that?
385 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:56:15am |
re: #373 Pianobuff
Rasmussen is already polling this. From today’s daily tracking poll:
“The President recently said he is open to considering the idea of giving tax breaks to struggling newspapers. Thirty-seven percent (37%) of American adults say it would be better to provide some federal subsidies rather than let the newspapers go out of business. However, only 17% favor a government bailout of the newspaper industry.
In fact, just 25% even favor the creation of a White House commission to help find ways for struggling news organizations survive. “
Isn’t a tax break the same thing as a subsidy in that money is not flowing from the paper to the government?
386 | HoosierHoops Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:56:30am |
re: #380 Locker
I’m very disappointed in Obama..
No free mortgage, Car, Gas, food and healthcare..
Where is my free shit!?
387 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:57:09am |
re: #383 Walter L. Newton
There is NO LAW REQUIRING ME TO OWN A CAR. This idea that has been floated will REQUIRE me to purchase something whether I want it or not. It will be a requirement for ALL CITIZENS.
You ok with that?
I know I’ve been relatively quiet on the thread up to this point, but this statement here is what convinced the Mrs. Fish that ObamaCare was a bad thing. She thought it was offensive that people would be forced to buy something they didn’t want to buy (and equally so that people like me would have to help pay for it!).
388 | Flyers1974 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:57:37am |
re: #321 badger1970
It didn’t matter who was nominated, Kennedy had it written like a Mad-Lib, just insert the proper noun.
You may be right, but Robert Bork was an extreme nominee. Far to the right of Rhenquist, Scalia, Thomas, Alito, etc… . And not to imply this had anything to do with the Dem’s remarks, which it of course did not, but as an aside, I believe Bork has stated the second amendment doesn’t apply to individuals.
389 | Locker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:57:56am |
re: #383 Walter L. Newton
There is NO LAW REQUIRING ME TO OWN A CAR. This idea that has been floated will REQUIRE me to purchase something whether I want it or not. It will be a requirement for ALL CITIZENS.
You ok with that?
Why are you yelling at me? If you follow the analogy you already own a “car” (your body), the point of owning a car or not owning a car is moot.
Yes, I’m ok with that. The same as it’s a requirement to do all kinds of things for all citizens.
390 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:59:01am |
391 | Desert Dog Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:59:46am |
re: #389 Locker
Why are you yelling at me? If you follow the analogy you already own a “car” (your body), the point of owning a car or not owning a car is moot.
Yes, I’m ok with that. The same as it’s a requirement to do all kinds of things for all citizens.
Such as?
392 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:59:53am |
re: #386 HoosierHoops
I’m very disappointed in Obama..
No free mortgage, Car, Gas, food and healthcare..
Where is my free shit!?
They aren’t taxing feces.
…yet.
393 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:59:57am |
re: #380 Locker
Well I can see health insurance as protection for others as well as that person if you consider money. If you have no primary care and end up having a triple bypass via the emergency room and either it’s paid for with a tax funded thing or the hospital jacks it’s rates up on you to cover the uninsured. Just trying to see the angle.
That is more of an indirect cost. You can pay what you can afford out of pocket; you can take up a collection; you can, in some places, go to a hospital that has its own source of charity income.
And this gets down to whether health care is a right or not, and whether, if it is a right, everyone has a right to the same level of health care. The latter question is answered differently in different places. In England, people can get private coverage and go out of the NHS; in Canada, they have to go outside the country.
And many people are afraid that if health care is treated as a right, that everyone will be dragged down to the same level of care, because giving everyone the top standard of care is very, very expensive. (Compare the cost of Mass General with community hospitals.) We’d have to raise all the hospitals to Mass General levels, and that would take much more than we’re currently spending on health care. So we’ll see the middle class’ health care standard decline to save costs.
394 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:00:42am |
re: #385 MandyManners
Isn’t a tax break the same thing as a subsidy in that money is not flowing from the paper to the government?
Yes. Words are funny things. Some sound better than others.
One of my favorites is “increase revenues” when they mean “raise taxes”.
395 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:00:46am |
re: #383 Walter L. Newton
There is NO LAW REQUIRING ME TO OWN A CAR. This idea that has been floated will REQUIRE me to purchase something whether I want it or not. It will be a requirement for ALL CITIZENS.
You ok with that?
BTW, even in Mass., there is a religious exemption. If you don’t want to buy health insurance, become a Christian Scientist.
//
396 | Locker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:00:50am |
re: #391 Desert Dog
Such as?
Register for selective service. Follow the laws. Pay my taxes. Etc, etc.
397 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:00:55am |
398 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:01:02am |
re: #392 JamesTKirk
They aren’t taxing feces.
…yet.
That’d bankrupt everyone in Congress.
/takes down notes
399 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:01:24am |
re: #388 Flyers1974
You may be right, but Robert Bork was an extreme nominee. Far to the right… I believe Bork has stated the second amendment doesn’t apply to individuals.
How is that a “far right” stance?
400 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:01:41am |
re: #386 HoosierHoops
I’m very disappointed in Obama..
No free mortgage, Car, Gas, food and healthcare..
Where is my free shit!?
The unicorns have been back ordered. Current arrival date is 2012.
401 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:02:35am |
re: #390 JamesTKirk
I can’t believe you just gave his nads the clap.
I spat out my cigarette—hot ash all over my lap. Good thing I’m clothed.
402 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:02:37am |
re: #396 Locker
Register for selective service. Follow the laws. Pay my taxes. Etc, etc.
Please note, with the exception of taxes, you’re not buying anything. Forcing everyone to buy health insurance is like asking every citizen of the United States to buy a gun because police and military use of firearms reduces the incidence of crime and terrorism.
403 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:02:47am |
re: #398 laZardo
That’d bankrupt everyone in Congress.
/takes down notes
That could just get you on the top 10 list.
404 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:03:17am |
405 | FrogMarch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:03:23am |
re: #384 laZardo
hmmm - my neighbor’s kid named his dog after the lead singer.
OY.
406 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:03:27am |
407 | Locker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:03:32am |
re: #393 Kosh’s Shadow
That is more of an indirect cost. You can pay what you can afford out of pocket; you can take up a collection; you can, in some places, go to a hospital that has its own source of charity income.
And this gets down to whether health care is a right or not, and whether, if it is a right, everyone has a right to the same level of health care. The latter question is answered differently in different places. In England, people can get private coverage and go out of the NHS; in Canada, they have to go outside the country.
And many people are afraid that if health care is treated as a right, that everyone will be dragged down to the same level of care, because giving everyone the top standard of care is very, very expensive. (Compare the cost of Mass General with community hospitals.) We’d have to raise all the hospitals to Mass General levels, and that would take much more than we’re currently spending on health care. So we’ll see the middle class’ health care standard decline to save costs.
I can see that perspective. My optimism, however, allows me to think that IF the standard of care started to drop on the upper or middle class then they would be unhappy about it and we’d put more money into it to bring the level back up, for everyone. Folks are pretty demanding in this country.
408 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:03:39am |
re: #389 Locker
Why are you yelling at me? If you follow the analogy you already own a “car” (your body), the point of owning a car or not owning a car is moot.
Yes, I’m ok with that. The same as it’s a requirement to do all kinds of things for all citizens.
Really. You want the government telling you what you can or can’t do with your body? Isn’t this the same argument that pro-abortion people use? You can’t have it both ways, can you? If you are ok with this, than you should be ok if pro-life becomes the norm.
409 | Vicious Babushka Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:04:03am |
re: #383 Walter L. Newton
There is NO LAW REQUIRING ME TO OWN A CAR. This idea that has been floated will REQUIRE me to purchase something whether I want it or not. It will be a requirement for ALL CITIZENS.
You ok with that?
But it won’t be a requirement for non-citizens, they will all get for free what you have to pay for.
But, what goes around comes around. My husband had to be rushed to the hospital in Israel for a hypoglycemic event. He didn’t have his passport or credit card with him. When they demanded payment, he knows enough Hebrew to tell them to perform an act on themselves.
410 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:04:18am |
re: #394 Pianobuff
Yes. Words are funny things. Some sound better than others.
One of my favorites is “increase revenues” when they mean “raise taxes”.
It’s defined by whose ox is geting gored.
411 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:04:34am |
re: #401 MandyManners
I spat out my cigarette—hot ash all over my lap. Good thing I’m clothed.
How many times has that happened when you weren’t?
//
412 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:05:35am |
Gotta walk the dogs just when things are getting funny.
BBL and keep the bon mots flowing.
413 | irish rose Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:05:40am |
414 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:05:45am |
re: #402 thedopefishlives
Please note, with the exception of taxes, you’re not buying anything. Forcing everyone to buy health insurance is like asking every citizen of the United States to buy a gun because police and military use of firearms reduces the incidence of crime and terrorism.
IIRC, Carla Howell (libertarian) ran on that platform for governor of Massachusetts.
There were a lot of signs for her around where I live; I think that was because of the big gun store in the area.
415 | Flyers1974 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:06:12am |
re: #399 JamesTKirk
How is that a “far right” stance?
It is not of course. Just mentioned it because I know many conservatives love Bork.
416 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:06:15am |
re: #401 MandyManners
I spat out my cigarette—hot ash all over my lap. Good thing I’m clothed.
Well, you give me an opening like that, how can I not jump in?
417 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:06:22am |
re: #388 Flyers1974
You may be right, but Robert Bork was an extreme nominee. Far to the right of Rhenquist, Scalia, Thomas, Alito, etc… . And not to imply this had anything to do with the Dem’s remarks, which it of course did not, but as an aside, I believe Bork has stated the second amendment doesn’t apply to individuals.
Have you actually read Slouching Towards Gomorrah?
418 | Danny Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:06:40am |
re: #394 Pianobuff
One of my favorites is “increase revenues” when they mean “raise taxes”.
Don’t forget the “will cost the government” they like to use when talking about cutting taxes.
419 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:06:56am |
re: #396 Locker
Register for selective service. Follow the laws. Pay my taxes. Etc, etc.
Selective service has nothing to do with taxes, we are talking taxes. No, I don’t have to pay taxes if I don’t work, and there is no law that requires me to work (not yet, Obama is missing a good bet on that idea). Following laws are not taxes, stick to the point that we are talking about, paying a tax or fine.
420 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:07:12am |
re: #408 Walter L. Newton
Really. You want the government telling you what you can or can’t do with your body? Isn’t this the same argument that pro-abortion people use? You can’t have it both ways, can you? If you are ok with this, than you should be ok if pro-life becomes the norm.
“Keep your laws off my body!”
//”Oh, government health care? er… actually just keep them off a few parts of my body, the rest you must care for.
421 | Locker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:07:15am |
re: #408 Walter L. Newton
Really. You want the government telling you what you can or can’t do with your body? Isn’t this the same argument that pro-abortion people use? You can’t have it both ways, can you? If you are ok with this, than you should be ok if pro-life becomes the norm.
I’m having trouble following this so let me try to rephrase and check. You are saying that if everyone has to have health insurance that health insurance companies will some how restrict what you are able do? Like no smoking or no base jumping?
422 | Locker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:07:34am |
re: #419 Walter L. Newton
Selective service has nothing to do with taxes, we are talking taxes. No, I don’t have to pay taxes if I don’t work, and there is no law that requires me to work (not yet, Obama is missing a good bet on that idea). Following laws are not taxes, stick to the point that we are talking about, paying a tax or fine.
He asked me for examples of things all citizens had to do.
423 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:08:20am |
re: #405 FrogMarch
hmmm - my neighbor’s kid named his dog after the lead singer.
OY.
Flea is the bassist, Anthony Kiedis is the lead singer.
424 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:08:25am |
re: #407 Locker
I can see that perspective. My optimism, however, allows me to think that IF the standard of care started to drop on the upper or middle class then they would be unhappy about it and we’d put more money into it to bring the level back up, for everyone. Folks are pretty demanding in this country.
They’d want better care until they found their taxes would go up 10-20% and I mean if they’re currently paying 30%, they’d go to 40-50%, not 33-36%.
Then they’d want the plan changed so they could buy insurance and not subsidize everyone.
BTW, the plan my company has limits use of expensive hospitals like Mass General. I’m not complaining, although I might be if I need a quadruple bypass and they wanted me to go to one of the local hospitals (especially the one I don’t use because every doctor there I looked up had disciplinary action against him or her.)
425 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:08:53am |
re: #407 Locker
I can see that perspective. My optimism, however, allows me to think that IF the standard of care started to drop on the upper or middle class then they would be unhappy about it and we’d put more money into it to bring the level back up, for everyone. Folks are pretty demanding in this country.
Where would that money come from?
426 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:09:22am |
re: #421 Locker
I’m having trouble following this so let me try to rephrase and check. You are saying that if everyone has to have health insurance that health insurance companies will some how restrict what you are able do? Like no smoking or no base jumping?
You know what I am talking about. You go back and read what I have wrote. No one else is confused, are they? You made yourself clear as a bell about you position and so have I. No one but you are confused.
427 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:09:30am |
re: #411 Spenser (with an S)
How many times has that happened when you weren’t?
//
Once I was wearing shorts.
428 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:09:32am |
re: #410 MandyManners
It’s defined by whose ox is geting gored.
Does Al Gore know how much greenhouse gas his ox emits?
///
429 | FrogMarch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:09:55am |
430 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:10:08am |
re: #422 Locker
He asked me for examples of things all citizens had to do.
We are talking taxes or fines. Stick to the subject. No one else is having any trouble understanding what I am saying, just you.
Wonder why?
431 | Vicious Babushka Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:10:20am |
re: #422 Locker
He asked me for examples of things all citizens had to do.
The examples you provided do not apply to all citizens.
433 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:10:31am |
re: #425 MandyManners
and we’d put more money into it to bring the level back up, for everyone. Folks are pretty demanding in this country.Where would that money come from?
And why would all that money necessarily make the care better?
434 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:10:35am |
re: #416 JamesTKirk
Well, you give me an opening like that, how can I not jump in?
Because you’re a gentleman who would never score points off a woman’s words?
HA!
435 | Locker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:11:03am |
re: #424 Kosh’s Shadow
They’d want better care until they found their taxes would go up 10-20% and I mean if they’re currently paying 30%, they’d go to 40-50%, not 33-36%.
Then they’d want the plan changed so they could buy insurance and not subsidize everyone.BTW, the plan my company has limits use of expensive hospitals like Mass General. I’m not complaining, although I might be if I need a quadruple bypass and they wanted me to go to one of the local hospitals (especially the one I don’t use because every doctor there I looked up had disciplinary action against him or her.)
Someone used an example from Finland or Germany or something as an example of bad socialized medicine. They described having to talk to a nurse first, if she thinks you are bad enough off you come in and see another nurse, then if she can’t treat you or thinks you are a bad enough you finally see a doctor.
The funny thing being that’s exactly how my HMO (Kaiser) works. Almost word for word to the example. Now I’m not complaining about it and while it could be better and you have to advocate for yourself I do get care but it was just humorous.
436 | Locker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:11:30am |
re: #426 Walter L. Newton
You know what I am talking about. You go back and read what I have wrote. No one else is confused, are they? You made yourself clear as a bell about you position and so have I. No one but you are confused.
If you don’t want to have a conversation and you can’t fathom that someone is asking real questions that’s fine.
437 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:11:38am |
438 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:12:06am |
439 | Locker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:12:09am |
re: #430 Walter L. Newton
We are talking taxes or fines. Stick to the subject. No one else is having any trouble understanding what I am saying, just you.
Wonder why?
I am talking about your car insurance example. You don’t decide what I”m talking about, I do.
440 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:12:14am |
re: #436 Locker
If you don’t want to have a conversation and you can’t fathom that someone is asking real questions that’s fine.
My point was made.
441 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:12:15am |
re: #436 Locker
If you don’t want to have a conversation and you can’t fathom that someone is asking real questions that’s fine.
If you want to have a conversation, start by comprehending what the other person is saying. In common parlance, it’s known as “listening”.
442 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:12:45am |
re: #433 Spenser (with an S)
And why would all that money necessarily make the care better?
I was quoting Locker.
443 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:13:07am |
re: #415 Flyers1974
re: #399 JamesTKirkre: #388 Flyers1974You may be right, but Robert Bork was an extreme nominee. Far to the right… I believe Bork has stated the second amendment doesn’t apply to individuals.How is that a “far right” stance?
It is not of course. Just mentioned it because I know many conservatives love Bork.
Yes, but if you want to throw out your opinion that Bork was not just an extremist but an extreme extremist, far more extreme than all of the other extremists you listed (apparently any non-liberal SCOTUS justice), then you really ought to provide a stance of his which supports your assertion. Following up your assertion with a piece of evidence which directly contradicts it is not a very good debating technique.
444 | Locker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:13:12am |
re: #440 Walter L. Newton
My point was made.
The point that you are hostile and won’t answer any questions and completely avoided the fact that your car insurance stuff was BS? Yes you proved your point.
446 | Locker Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:13:57am |
re: #441 thedopefishlives
If you want to have a conversation, start by comprehending what the other person is saying. In common parlance, it’s known as “listening”.
If you want to have a conversation you don’t jump all over someone and scream at them in caps, accuse them of knowing something they asked about then blowing them off.
447 | Flyers1974 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:14:03am |
448 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:14:52am |
re: #421 Locker
I’m having trouble following this so let me try to rephrase and check. You are saying that if everyone has to have health insurance that health insurance companies will some how restrict what you are able do? Like no smoking or no base jumping?
Good thing I gave up bungee jumping in the 90s.
449 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:14:53am |
I wish people would read or even re-read Slouching Towards Gomorrah.
450 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:16:11am |
re: #431 Alouette
The examples you provided do not apply to all citizens.
Do women have to sign up for selective service?
451 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:16:16am |
re: #442 MandyManners
I was quoting Locker.
I know, I was just adding another point to your brilliant point.
452 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:16:21am |
My mother’s birthday was yesterday and seeing as how we’re talking about health care, I’m reminded of when I asked her “Why can’t we have universal health care in the Philippines?”
She simply replied, “There’s no money!”
Wisdom without borders.
453 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:16:42am |
re: #449 MandyManners
I wish people would read or even re-read Slouching Towards Gomorrah.
Can you give me an executive summary? I may add it to my reading list.
454 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:16:51am |
re: #446 Locker
If you want to have a conversation you don’t jump all over someone and scream at them in caps, accuse them of knowing something they asked about then blowing them off.
Looks like you loose. Get a clue.
455 | Vicious Babushka Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:16:54am |
456 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:17:19am |
re: #434 MandyManners
Because you’re a gentleman who would never score points off a woman’s words?HA!
You think it’s her words that I’m trying to score with?
457 | McSpiff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:18:07am |
re: #454 Walter L. Newton
If you’re going to be an ass walter, you might want to preview your posts.
458 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:18:20am |
re: #447 Flyers1974
Yes. Why do you ask?
Then you would know that he is not an extremist nor is he a wild-eyed reactionary. His analysis of the 60s and 70s is spot-on. We’re seeing the fruits of those days right now. This adminstration is trying to shove The Port Huron Statement down our throats.
Although he didn’t name him, Bork showed how Gramsci still lives.
459 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:19:03am |
re: #451 Spenser (with an S)
I know, I was just adding another point to your brilliant point.
It wouldn’t make it better.
460 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:20:51am |
re: #453 thedopefishlives
Can you give me an executive summary? I may add it to my reading list.
Se my No. 458. He seems to be a fan of Burke, too.
It might be out of publication. Amazon has it, I’m sure.
461 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:22:04am |
re: #457 McSpiff
If you’re going to be an ass walter, you might want to preview your posts.
Thank you for pointing out my spelling.
462 | Flyers1974 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:23:00am |
re: #443 JamesTKirk
Yes, but if you want to throw out your opinion that Bork was not just an extremist but an extreme extremist, far more extreme than all of the other extremists you listed (apparently any non-liberal SCOTUS justice), then you really ought to provide a stance of his which supports your assertion. Following up your assertion with a piece of evidence which directly contradicts it is not a very good debating technique.
You are incorrect regarding your assumption that I view Thomas, Scalia, Alito, etc…, as extreme. I would characterize them as very conservative. Scalia is very conservative as Stevens is very liberal. But you’re right, the second amendment stance didn’t support my argument.
463 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:23:11am |
re: #435 Locker
Someone used an example from Finland or Germany or something as an example of bad socialized medicine. They described having to talk to a nurse first, if she thinks you are bad enough off you come in and see another nurse, then if she can’t treat you or thinks you are a bad enough you finally see a doctor.
The funny thing being that’s exactly how my HMO (Kaiser) works. Almost word for word to the example. Now I’m not complaining about it and while it could be better and you have to advocate for yourself I do get care but it was just humorous.
That is how HMOs generally work, but there were enough complaints about this that most companies offer a more expensive plan that lets you see anyone in the network without a referral.
If the government runs it, would that choice still be there? It is there because people wanted it, so companies asked for it to keep their employees happy.
464 | McSpiff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:23:16am |
re: #461 Walter L. Newton
Believe me, I checked both your spelling and mine about 4 times before sticking my neck out on that one.
465 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:23:30am |
re: #457 McSpiff
If you’re going to be an ass walter, you might want to preview your posts.
“Walter”, as a proper noun, ought to be capitalized; furthermore, as you’re addressing him, there ought to be a comma both before and after his name.
466 | McSpiff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:24:15am |
re: #463 Kosh’s Shadow
As a Canadian, the government uses improving health care as a way to win more votes. So there is incentive.
467 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:24:20am |
re: #464 McSpiff
Believe me, I checked both your spelling and mine about 4 times before sticking my neck out on that one.
I don’t consider that “sticking you neck out.” You had an opinion about my comment and my approach to Locker. It was valid.
468 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:24:28am |
re: #462 Flyers1974
You are incorrect regarding your assumption that I view Thomas, Scalia, Alito, etc…, as extreme. I would characterize them as very conservative. Scalia is very conservative as Stevens is very liberal. But you’re right, the second amendment stance didn’t support my argument.
Spoken like a gentleman. Updinged, and subject dropped.
469 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:25:15am |
re: #465 JamesTKirk
“Walter”, as a proper noun, ought to be capitalized; furthermore, as you’re addressing him, there ought to be a comma both before and after his name.
:)
471 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:27:01am |
473 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:27:19am |
re: #469 Walter L. Newton
:)
It’s generally not a good idea to flame other people’s spelling, grammar, or punctuation just because you inevitably make some mistake of your own in the process. So I try to restrict myself to only correcting people who correct other people, except in the most egregious cases (or when an innuendo can be made from the mistake, of course).
474 | FrogMarch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:27:20am |
475 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:27:26am |
re: #466 McSpiff
As a Canadian, the government uses improving health care as a way to win more votes. So there is incentive.
And I knew someone who left Canada due to the taxes. (He said he was a “snowback”.) I don’t think the level of taxation necessary to give top care to everyone would survive the next election.
476 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:28:33am |
re: #471 Spenser (with an S)
Walter’s not all that proper though, is he?
He appears to be from my position, down here in the gutter.
477 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:28:52am |
478 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:29:52am |
re: #464 McSpiff
Believe me, I checked both your spelling and mine about
4four times before sticking out my neckouton that one.
479 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:29:53am |
re: #472 Walter L. Newton
Snowing here right now.
I’m so jealous, I didn’t know whether to up- or down-ding you for that.
480 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:30:40am |
re: #465 JamesTKirk
“Walter”, as a proper noun, ought to be capitalized; furthermore, as you’re addressing him, there ought to be a comma both before and after his name.
You’re sexy when you’re pedantic.
482 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:31:44am |
re: #479 JamesTKirk
I’m so jealous, I didn’t know whether to up- or down-ding you for that.
We need a horizontal ding option.
483 | FrogMarch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:31:48am |
re: #472 Walter L. Newton
Snowing here right now.
Raining here. My hiking plans are shot. The temperature in Leadville is
… wintertime.
484 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:32:21am |
re: #474 FrogMarch
I think the word you are looking for is “Lose”.
Except there was no reason for you to capitalize it.
As in - “You lose”
You’re missing a period. (There’s a sentence I used to really hate when I was single!)
Loose - As in —‘your shoe laces are loose.’
Why the inconsistency vis-a-vis single and double quotation marks, not to mention single and double hyphens? Also, “your” should have been capitalized.
485 | FrogMarch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:32:42am |
486 | Flyers1974 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:32:54am |
re: #458 MandyManners
Then you would know that he is not an extremist nor is he a wild-eyed reactionary. His analysis of the 60s and 70s is spot-on. We’re seeing the fruits of those days right now. This adminstration is trying to shove The Port Huron Statement down our throats.
Although he didn’t name him, Bork showed how Gramsci still lives.
His statements about the decline of America sounded bizarre. Didn’t he call the US a pagan society or words to that effect?
487 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:33:08am |
re: #479 JamesTKirk
I’m so jealous, I didn’t know whether to up- or down-ding you for that.
I don’t know. This is my first winter at 8200 feet (I’ve lived in the Denver area for 20 years), so, a lot is going to depend on how bothersome the snow is in regards to getting to work, downhill.
We’ll see. If anything, it should be interesting. I am currently 1/2 hour from the theatre where I work, 23 mile total traveling east, but that can be a nasty 23 miles during a big snowfall.
488 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:33:25am |
re: #484 JamesTKirk
Why the inconsistency vis-a-vis single and double quotation marks, not to mention single and double hyphens? Also, “your” should have been capitalized.
Oh, baby, baby.
489 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:33:37am |
re: #482 MandyManners
We need a horizontal ding option.
I get a horizontal ding when you call me sexy.
490 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:34:25am |
Yesterday, the Russians said Peres said that Israel wouldn’t attack Iran.
Glad to see today some adult has spoken up:
Ayalon: Military option against Iran is still on the table
According to Reuters, President Shimon Peres made the pledge to Medvedev during a meeting in the Russian resort of Sochi in August.“When he visited me in Sochi, Israeli President Peres said something important for us all: ‘Israel does not plan to launch any strikes on Iran, we are a peaceful country and we will not do this’,” Medvedev said.
The role of Peres as president is mainly ceremonial and he does not determine policy.
Is Peres senile, or are the Russians leaving out something important, like “If Iran doesn’t develop a bomb…”?
Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon insisted Monday that the military option against Iran was still on the table, rejecting comments made by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev last week and published Sunday.Ayalon told the Reuters news agency that Medvedev’s statement did not guarantee Israel would not attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, should the international diplomatic push to stymie its nuclear aspirations prove futile.
“It is certainly not a guarantee. I don’t think that, with all due respect, the Russian president is authorized to speak for Israel and certainly we have not taken any option off the table.”
But then there’s this:
In a transcript of the interview with Medvedev released by the Kremlin on Sunday, The Russian president hedged on the question of whether Russia would support Iran if it were attacked by Israel.Although Russia has no defense agreement with Iran “this does not mean we would like to be or will be indifferent to such an occurrence… But my Israeli colleagues told me they were not planning to act in this way, and I trust them,” Medvedev said.
That would be very bad, if Israel had to stop Iran from getting the bomb, and Russia backed Iran. Or what if Iran used a bomb and Israel retaliated? Would Russia still back Iran?
Fuck Russia.
491 | McSpiff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:34:29am |
Alright alright, next time ill read it five times.
Grumble Grumble.
/Mcspiff is aware there are errors in this post.
492 | FrogMarch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:34:49am |
re: #484 JamesTKirk
Why the inconsistency vis-a-vis single and double quotation marks, not to mention single and double hyphens? Also, “your” should have been capitalized.
try to help out and this is the thanx I get./
493 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:34:51am |
re: #486 Flyers1974
His statements about the decline of America sounded bizarre. Didn’t he call the US a pagan society or words to that effect?
When? Got a link?
494 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:35:19am |
I’m doing a study of religious abuse this morning for a blog entry, and I’m feeling more depressed by the minute.
I have to confess… I’ve been so saddened, discouraged and sickened by some of the things that are being done by conservatives in the name of religion lately that I’m starting to feel like the best thing to do would be to shut off the PC, stop looking at it and just let God deal with them.
Anyone else here feeling the same way?
495 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:35:24am |
re: #487 Walter L. Newton
I don’t know. This is my first winter at 8200 feet (I’ve lived in the Denver area for 20 years), so, a lot is going to depend on how bothersome the snow is in regards to getting to work, downhill.
We’ll see. If anything, it should be interesting. I am currently 1/2 hour from the theatre where I work, 23 mile total traveling east, but that can be a nasty 23 miles during a big snowfall.
I live in Maryland. We get the occasional flurry (which caused end-of-the-world panic in all of the local drivers), but only one decent snowstorm every couple of years. I grew up up north; I miss “real” winters.
496 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:35:39am |
497 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:35:46am |
re: #480 MandyManners
You’re sexy when you’re pedantic.
Sweet young girl from the south goes north for college. She goes to pledge a sorority and, trying to be friendly, walks up to some girls talking. “Hi, where are you all from?” With jaw clenched, one of the girls says “We are from places where one doesn’t end one’s sentences with a preposition”. Pause. “Ok”, she says, “Where are you all from, Bitch?”
499 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:36:12am |
re: #494 Irish Rose
I would have, but I stopped believing in God a long time ago.
/there, I said it.
500 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:36:48am |
re: #486 Flyers1974
His statements about the decline of America sounded bizarre. Didn’t he call the US a pagan society or words to that effect?
He did mention that de Tocqueville’s opinion was that democratic nations tend towards pantheism, which is not the same thing.
501 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:37:00am |
re: #492 FrogMarch
try to help out and this is the thanx I get./
See #473. It’s just one of the ironclad rules of the internet.
502 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:37:48am |
Brezinski is an asshole.
Former national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski has urged US President Barack Obama to make it clear that if the IAF tries to launch an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities via Iraqi airspace, the US Air Force will shoot down the Israeli jets.
He and his former boss Carter would be happy if Israel was nuked, wouldn’t they?
503 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:38:03am |
re: #495 JamesTKirk
I live in Maryland. We get the occasional flurry (which caused end-of-the-world panic in all of the local drivers), but only one decent snowstorm every couple of years. I grew up up north; I miss “real” winters.
I lived in New York City and then North Jersey from 52-70, saw a lot of winter. Denver gets enough, but not as much as you think. The mountains, well, they have 6 foot green poles attached to ground level utility boxes here so public service can find them after a storm.
504 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:38:14am |
re: #494 Irish Rose
I’m doing a study of religious abuse this morning for a blog entry, and I’m feeling more depressed by the minute.
I have to confess… I’ve been so saddened, discouraged and sickened by some of the things that are being done by conservatives in the name of religion lately that I’m starting to feel like the best thing to do would be to shut off the PC, stop looking at it and just let God deal with them.
Anyone else here feeling the same way?
As I’ve said before, when I’m overwhelmed by the idiocy of the world, I either get really pissed off, or I relieve myself by mocking it.
You may have noticed me doing a lot of mocking lately.
505 | Sheepdogess Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:38:27am |
There is no technical fix for the problems of humanity.Those problems, he knew, are ineradicably rooted in our nature; and he atomized that nature with a characteristic genius never since equaled: which is why every time we moderns consult his works, we come away with a deeper insight into the heart of our own mystery.
Take as a test case Macbeth, the shortest of his tragedies. The play is a study of ambition, the evil to which ambition leads when unrestrained by ethical inhibition, and the logic of evil once an evil course has been embarked upon. The ambition and the evil are part of man’s nature. All that is necessary to understand the play, therefore, is to be human: and if we attend to it closely, we shall have a deeper appreciation of its subject matter than if we read all the philosophy, sociology, criminology, and biology of the past two centuries. Statistics will not lead us to enlightenment about ourselves, any more than the elucidation of the human genome will render Shakespeare redundant. Those who think that an understanding of the double helix is the same as an understanding of ourselves are not only prey to an illusion but are stunting themselves as human beings, condemning themselves not to an advance in self-understanding but to a positive retrogression.
“Alas, poor country, almost afraid to know itself.
It cannot
Be called our mother, but our grave, where nothing,
But who knows nothing, is seen once to smile:
Where sighs, and groans, and shreiks that rend the air
Are made, not marked…
Cousins I hope
the day are near at hand
That chambers will be safe.”
Why Shakespeare Is For All Time
Theodore Dalrymple
OUR CULTURE, WHAT’S LEFT OF IT
[Link: www.city-journal.org…]
506 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:38:36am |
re: #499 laZardo
I would have, but I stopped believing in God a long time ago.
/there, I said it.
I still believe in God.
Just don’t think much of many of his earthly representatives.
507 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:38:50am |
re: #489 JamesTKirk
I get a horizontal ding when you call me sexy.
508 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:39:00am |
509 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:39:19am |
re: #504 JamesTKirk
As I’ve said before, when I’m overwhelmed by the idiocy of the world, I either get really pissed off, or I relieve myself by mocking it.
You may have noticed me doing a lot of mocking lately.
That’s the same reason so many of my comments tend to be humorous. I’d go nuts without a sense of humor.
510 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:39:20am |
re: #504 JamesTKirk
As I’ve said before, when I’m overwhelmed by the idiocy of the world, I either get really pissed off, or I
relieve myself by mocking it.go to 4chan.
Well, that’s what I do. Feels good, man.
511 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:39:32am |
re: #497 Spenser (with an S)
Sweet young girl from the south goes north for college. She goes to pledge a sorority and, trying to be friendly, walks up to some girls talking. “Hi, where are you all from?” With jaw clenched, one of the girls says “We are from places where one doesn’t end one’s sentences with a preposition”. Pause. “Ok”, she says, “Where are you all from, Bitch?”
One of my favorites!
512 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:40:10am |
re: #503 Walter L. Newton
I’ve only been to Denver in the summer.
513 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:40:52am |
re: #506 Irish Rose
I still believe in God.
Just don’t think much of many of his earthly representatives.
“God, save me from your followers!”
514 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:40:58am |
re: #502 Kosh’s Shadow
Brezinski is an asshole.
Former national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski has urged US President Barack Obama to make it clear that if the IAF tries to launch an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities via Iraqi airspace, the US Air Force will shoot down the Israeli jets.
He and his former boss Carter would be happy if Israel was nuked, wouldn’t they?
He and Carter need to be room-mates at Shady Groves Retirement Home.
515 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:41:49am |
re: #494 Irish Rose
You mention religion, but not which one. Are you looking at FGM, child brides, crazy Mormon breakaway groups, abuse by priests, the Christian villages burned down in India and Pakistan, militant-Jesus-boot-camp kids here or which particular bit of hell are you researching?
516 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:42:19am |
re: #486 Flyers1974
His statements about the decline of America sounded bizarre. Didn’t he call the US a pagan society or words to that effect?
Ever heard of Antonio Gramsci?
517 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:42:37am |
re: #509 Kosh’s Shadow
That’s the same reason so many of my comments tend to be humorous. I’d go nuts without a sense of humor.
Humour Is The Best Medicine.
- Readers Digest
518 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:42:52am |
re: #510 laZardo
re: #504 JamesTKirkAs I’ve said before, when I’m overwhelmed by the idiocy of the world, I either get really pissed off, or Irelieve myself by mocking it.go to 4chan.Well, that’s what I do. Feels good, man.
Sometimes that cure is worse than the disease. I understand there’s a cancer that is killing /b/.
ಠ_ಠ
519 | FrogMarch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:42:54am |
re: #501 JamesTKirk
See #473. It’s just one of the ironclad rules of the internet.
I see and tend to agree. I certainly have my share of bad grammar, poor punctuation, negligent capitalization and spelling errors. I’ve noticed Walter using the word “loose” when he means “lose” many times over the years. I couldn’t take it anymore.
520 | Flyers1974 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:43:17am |
re: #458 MandyManners
Then you would know that he is not an extremist nor is he a wild-eyed reactionary. His analysis of the 60s and 70s is spot-on. We’re seeing the fruits of those days right now. This adminstration is trying to shove The Port Huron Statement down our throats.
Although he didn’t name him, Bork showed how Gramsci still lives.
I’m sure most conservative (and perhaps some liberal) judges think the commerce clause has been interpreted to give congress more power than was intended by the framers. Fair enough. Given that interpreting that clause to literally only regulate commerce would completely change how this country functions, Scalia, Thomas, etc…, have not rendered decisions reflecting this originalist view. I’m not at all certain that Bork would follow suit.
521 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:43:24am |
re: #514 MandyManners
He and Carter need to be room-mates at Shady Groves Retirement Home.
That’s being too nice to them.
522 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:43:40am |
re: #494 Irish Rose
I’m doing a study of religious abuse this morning for a blog entry, and I’m feeling more depressed by the minute.
I have to confess… I’ve been so saddened, discouraged and sickened by some of the things that are being done by conservatives in the name of religion lately that I’m starting to feel like the best thing to do would be to shut off the PC, stop looking at it and just let God deal with them.
Anyone else here feeling the same way?
Wouldn’t silence indicate consent?
523 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:43:57am |
re: #518 JamesTKirk
(I don’t think I can get to 4chan from work, and I’m not sure that I should even try…)
524 | Flyers1974 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:44:02am |
525 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:44:22am |
526 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:44:56am |
re: #521 Kosh’s Shadow
That’s being too nice to them.
But it’s not crossing the line into [deleted] territory either.
527 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:45:18am |
re: #524 Flyers1974
No.
Decades ago he laid the framework for subverting the culture, and then governmet, of this nation.
I’ll find you a link.
528 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:46:04am |
And a voice of sense from Israel:
Benny Begin: No Chance of Peace as PA/Fatah Seeks Israel’s End
This really should be a “Duh!” statement, but it seems most of the world doesn’t realize it.
I’m not sure about this though:
Asked if he believes that U.S. President Obama was “somewhat naïve” in his approach to the Middle East, Begin responded, “No, I think that the Palestinian Authority and some Arab nations misunderstood the U.S. and European nations. They thought that the West would like to give them Israel’s head on a cheap plastic platter. This could not have happened, and therefore did not happen.”
I think there are plenty in the West that would like to give the Arabs Israel’s head on a cheap paper plate.
529 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:46:15am |
re: #515 Spenser (with an S)
You mention religion, but not which one. Are you looking at FGM, child brides, crazy Mormon breakaway groups, abuse by priests, the Christian villages burned down in India and Pakistan, militant-Jesus-boot-camp kids here or which particular bit of hell are you researching?
Religious abuse is not the exclusive property of any one religion.
530 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:47:36am |
re: #529 Irish Rose
Religious abuse is not the exclusive property of any one religion.
I agree with Mandy on this one. Turning away from a depressing topic like this won’t make it go away. The way to make it go away is to make a stand against it and say, “I know this is going on, I do not approve, and I call on others to disapprove and show their disapproval.”
531 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:49:46am |
re: #527 MandyManners
Decades ago he laid the framework for subverting the culture, and then governmet, of this nation.
I’ll find you a link.
[Link: www.nationalledger.com…]
[Link: www.hoover.org…]
532 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:49:46am |
re: #529 Irish Rose
Religious abuse is not the exclusive property of any one religion.
I know and I agree, that why I mentioned a number of them in my post.
533 | Irish Rose Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:50:03am |
re: #522 MandyManners
Wouldn’t silence indicate consent?
I think so, and it’s why I feel compelled to persevere.
534 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:50:47am |
re: #518 JamesTKirk
Sometimes that cure is worse than the disease. I understand there’s a cancer that is killing /b/.
ಠ_ಠ
Rules 1 & 2 aside, that’s why I head to /v/. Or /y/, when I’m feeling open minded.
/unfortunately, the 4chan division server hosting /v/ just kicked it.
ಥ_ಥ
535 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:50:55am |
re: #533 Irish Rose
I think so, and it’s why I feel compelled to persevere.
Let your light shine.
(((Rose)))
536 | Danny Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:50:57am |
I’m testing something. It is not directed at anyone here.
Testing… asshole
537 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:51:11am |
re: #530 thedopefishlives
I agree with Mandy on this one. Turning away from a depressing topic like this won’t make it go away. The way to make it go away is to make a stand against it and say, “I know this is going on, I do not approve, and I call on others to disapprove and show their disapproval.”
I’ve written the Vatican. They never reply.
539 | John Neverbend Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:52:57am |
re: #502 Kosh’s Shadow
Brezinski is an asshole.
I’m sure that Obama will ignore him. The reference to the Liberty was quite unnecessary.
540 | albusteve Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:53:10am |
re: #530 thedopefishlives
I agree with Mandy on this one. Turning away from a depressing topic like this won’t make it go away. The way to make it go away is to make a stand against it and say, “I know this is going on, I do not approve, and I call on others to disapprove and show their disapproval.”
then I’ll vote present
541 | HoosierHoops Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:53:35am |
re: #537 JamesTKirk
I’ve written the Vatican. They never reply.
They reply when asking for the Pope’s autograph..Weird huh?
542 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:54:19am |
re: #534 laZardo
Rules 1 & 2 aside, that’s why I head to /v/. Or /y/, when I’m feeling open minded.
Off the top of my head, I have no idea what /y/ is.
¯(°_o)/¯
More often then not I don’t read the boards; I just use a script to download all of the images.
545 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:57:41am |
re: #542 JamesTKirk
Off the top of my head, I have no idea what /y/ is.
¯(°_o)/¯
It’s the yaoi board. Best we leave it at that.
546 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:57:46am |
re: #539 John Neverbend
I’m sure that Obama will ignore him. The reference to the Liberty was quite unnecessary.
I don’t think Obama will go as far as Brezhinski said, but I think Gates has already warned Israel about attacking Iran via Iraq. If you notice, Israel has been investigating other options.
547 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:58:33am |
re: #536 Danny
I’m testing something. It is not directed at anyone here.
Testing… asshole
There’s joike somewhere about a No. 2 pencil but, I won’t look for it.
548 | Spare O'Lake Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:59:11am |
re: #533 Irish Rose
I think so, and it’s why I feel compelled to persevere.
All must persevere
Yet neither be too perverse
In the blogosphere
549 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:59:19am |
re: #545 laZardo
It’s the yaoi board. Best we leave it at that.
OK. I’ve never felt the need to visit that one.
I’ve always been amused by the word “yaoi” however. I assume that’s the sound I’d make if some seme ever tried to get yaoi with me… “Yowie!”
550 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:59:44am |
re: #546 Kosh’s Shadow
I don’t think Obama will go as far as Brezhinski said, but I think Gates has already warned Israel about attacking Iran via Iraq. If you notice, Israel has been investigating other options.
What about Netanyahu’s visit to Moscow a few weeks ago? Was it only about that missing ship?
551 | John Neverbend Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:59:57am |
re: #546 Kosh’s Shadow
I don’t think Obama will go as far as Brezhinski said, but I think Gates has already warned Israel about attacking Iran via Iraq. If you notice, Israel has been investigating other options.
I don’t think the Israelis were moved by what Gates said. They’re investigating other options because they probably realize that an air strike is limited in its effects. I just looked at a map of the region. Assuming that they don’t fly the “silly route” down the Red Sea and around Yemen and Oman, they’ll be over Iraq for 450 miles.
552 | Dreader1962 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:00:01am |
re: #505 Sheepdogess
England, bound in with the triumphant sea,
Whose rocky shore beats back the envious siege
Of watery Neptune, is now bound in with shame,
With inky blots, and rotten parchment bonds:
That England, that was wont to conquer others,
Hath made a shameful conquest of itself.
Ah! would the scandal vanish with my life,
How happy then were my ensuing death.
King Richard II, Act II, Scene 1
There is nothing new under the sun…
553 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:00:26am |
Ok…
Now we have an half an inch of snow.
554 | Flyers1974 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:03:29am |
re: #500 MandyManners
He did mention that de Tocqueville’s opinion was that democratic nations tend towards pantheism, which is not the same thing.
True, I didn’t remember that, but he describes our society as “a degenerate society,” “enfeebled, hedonistic,” “subpagan,” and headed for “ultimate degradation.”
[Link: www.reason.com…]
555 | albusteve Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:03:37am |
Soon after the controversy erupted, Lewis released a statement suggesting race was behind an attempt by conservative critics to “destroy” ACORN. ACORN provides assistance to low-income and often minority communities.
[Link: www.foxnews.com…]
well what’ya know?…obviously ACORN has nothing to hide
556 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:04:01am |
re: #550 MandyManners
What about Netanyahu’s visit to Moscow a few weeks ago? Was it only about that missing ship?
Good question. See my earlier post re: #490 Kosh’s Shadow
on Peres’ trip to Russia. It doesn’t look like Russia will help in any way, and they’re noncommittal on whether they’d defend Iran.
557 | Honorary Yooper Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:05:21am |
re: #407 Locker
I can see that perspective. My optimism, however, allows me to think that IF the standard of care started to drop on the upper or middle class then they would be unhappy about it and we’d put more money into it to bring the level back up, for everyone. Folks are pretty demanding in this country.
Locker, where does that money come from? There are only a few ways the federal government can obtain money. These are tariffs and taxes. Tariffs will set off a trade war, so that leaves taxes. Quite frankly, I really think we spend too much in taxes right now.
Just because they print money does not mean that that money can be used directly by them.
558 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:05:57am |
re: #553 Walter L. Newton
Ok…
Now we have an half an inch of snow.
When I got back from my visit to the far north, all my friends asked me if I’d shaken the snow off my boots yet. I don’t know why they get the idea that a city sitting only 600 feet above sea level would have snow, especially sitting on the world’s largest freshwater lake.
560 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:06:19am |
re: #551 John Neverbend
I don’t think the Israelis were moved by what Gates said. They’re investigating other options because they probably realize that an air strike is limited in its effects. I just looked at a map of the region. Assuming that they don’t fly the “silly route” down the Red Sea and around Yemen and Oman, they’ll be over Iraq for 450 miles.
The US would need to let them fly that far over Iraq, and while I doubt there would be an actual shootdown, I think the US would push it almost there to get the Israelis to turn back.
561 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:06:44am |
re: #552 Dreader1962
There is nothing new under the sun…
As some day it may happen that a victim must be found,
I’ve got a little list – I’ve got a little list
Of society offenders who might well be underground,
And who never would be missed – who never would be missed!
[…]
Then the idiot who praises, with enthusiastic tone,
All centuries but this, and every country but his own;
[…]
You may put ‘em on the list – you may put ‘em on the list;
And they’ll none of ‘em be missed – they’ll none of ‘em be missed!
“I’ve Got a Little List” from The Mikado by Gilbert & Sullivan
562 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:07:22am |
re: #560 Kosh’s Shadow
The US would need to let them fly that far over Iraq, and while I doubt there would be an actual shootdown, I think the US would push it almost there to get the Israelis to turn back.
Honestly, I don’t think they would. I think they’d fall back on the old “We weren’t watching for them, they took us by surprise, we won’t let it happen again” excuse with an under-the-table “Please don’t embarrass us like that again.”
563 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:08:51am |
re: #562 thedopefishlives
Honestly, I don’t think they would. I think they’d fall back on the old “We weren’t watching for them, they took us by surprise, we won’t let it happen again” excuse with an under-the-table “Please don’t embarrass us like that again.”
450 miles is too far. The US would look stupid and incompetent. Besides, the US has a radar inside Israel, part of missile defense, that will give the US warning of any launch. No one would believe the US.
564 | albusteve Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:09:27am |
re: #560 Kosh’s Shadow
The US would need to let them fly that far over Iraq, and while I doubt there would be an actual shootdown, I think the US would push it almost there to get the Israelis to turn back.
why would you assume the Iraqis have no say about it?…the US does not own Iraqi air space
565 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:10:02am |
re: #561 JamesTKirk
Multiple updings for Gilbert and Sullivan.
I love the way they stopped executions in The Mikado. They simply made the first person in line, the Lord High Executioner.
(And all this because adultery was a capital offense.)
566 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:10:05am |
re: #554 Flyers1974
True, I didn’t remember that, but he describes our society as “a degenerate society,” “enfeebled, hedonistic,” “subpagan,” and headed for “ultimate degradation.”
[Link: www.reason.com…]
Well, I’m reading it again right now. It was not written to make people happy or comfortable. Considering all the flak he caught for it, he was over the target.
568 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:10:45am |
re: #563 Kosh’s Shadow
450 miles is too far. The US would look stupid and incompetent. Besides, the US has a radar inside Israel, part of missile defense, that will give the US warning of any launch. No one would believe the US.
No one believes us anyway. :D
But in all seriousness, I doubt the commanders on the ground would mount any serious effort to stop the Israelis if they launched a strike through Iraq. They might if they were ordered to, of course, but the guys in Washington would have to be pretty specific.
569 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:11:51am |
re: #564 albusteve
why would you assume the Iraqis have no say about it?…the US does not own Iraqi air space
Iraq could say what they want, but they have no airpower. However, there is no way they’re going support an Israeli attack on Iran. They’d ask the US to do something.
And then, once the US has been asked, the Israeli planes are through, but they have to come back.
570 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:13:34am |
re: #568 thedopefishlives
No one believes us anyway. :D
But in all seriousness, I doubt the commanders on the ground would mount any serious effort to stop the Israelis if they launched a strike through Iraq. They might if they were ordered to, of course, but the guys in Washington would have to be pretty specific.
I think the guys on the ground wouldn’t take action on their own, except to slow down action (“We needed to be sure they weren’t our aircraft, General, we fly the same type of aircraft.”) but they’d be warned for the flight back, and it would be harder not to do anything.
571 | albusteve Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:13:44am |
re: #569 Kosh’s Shadow
Iraq could say what they want, but they have no airpower. However, there is no way they’re going support an Israeli attack on Iran. They’d ask the US to do something.
And then, once the US has been asked, the Israeli planes are through, but they have to come back.
why would the Iraqis deny Israel the airspace?…are you sure they would?
572 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:13:56am |
re: #549 JamesTKirk
Aww, hell. There’s a Star Trek thread up on /y/ now.
573 | Dreader1962 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:14:07am |
re: #568 thedopefishlives
No one believes us anyway. :D
But in all seriousness, I doubt the commanders on the ground would mount any serious effort to stop the Israelis if they launched a strike through Iraq. They might if they were ordered to, of course, but the guys in Washington would have to be pretty specific.
I remember during Gulf War I after the first Scud hit Israel, we had reports of Israeli planes scrambling and flying towards Iraq. It made for some tense moments, and quick assurances were made to Israel that we would suppress the Scud launchers as a priority. All bets would have been off if any of them had chemical warheads, though.
The pucker factor was quite high. We had no idea what the IDF planes were carrying.
574 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:14:34am |
re: #559 Flyers1974
I’ll check them out.
I hope so. And, then, reread what Bork wrote about the legacy of the Port Huron Statement, SDS, Weathermen and the like. Read again what he wrote about the sacking of the universities and where the radicals wound up other than politics: Hollywood and academia, two stalwarts of culture.
575 | Land Shark Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:15:09am |
re: #93 SixDegrees
I served on a jury for 4 days last week. It was appalling. A guy was charged with:
Attempted murder with a deadly weapon
Armed Burglary
Aggravated Assault and Battery
Armed Kidnapping
The evidence submitted by the State of Florida was inadequate and pathetic. The evidence of the deadly weapon, a broken bottle, was not one but two pictures of a small piece of glass about 1/8th of an inch across. That’s it. The woman who worked at a hospital was supposedly beaten up by the guy, an ex-boyfriend, in her car in the parking lot of the hospital just outside the emergency room. There was no, I repeat, no medical report submitted as evidence, the only evidence presented was one picture where we had a hard time determining if the side of her face was slightly swollen, no additional pictures presented. There were NO other witnesses other than the man and the woman. That the state of Florida could take a case with such serious charges to trial on such ludicrous, flimsy evidence was disturbing. Oh, they also had held the guy in jail without bond for 2 1/2 years.
Thankfully, the six people in that jury room took their charge seriously and we did the right thing. We acquitted the defendant on all charges except on a lesser included offense of misdemeanor battery, since the only thing the testimony of the 2 people agreed on was that he had entered the vehicle un-invited and they had touched. But since the penalty for that charge is no more than a year in jail he was getting out that day on time served. Like I said, it was a disturbing and eye opening case, to hold a defendant in jail for 2 1/2 years and then try him on such serious charges with such pathetically inadequate evidence. I’m convinced God put us there to put an end to that travesty of justice and we did. The defendant was quite fortunate 6 conscientious people were there who took their charge seriously and did the right thing.
576 | Honorary Yooper Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:15:26am |
re: #558 thedopefishlives
When I got back from my visit to the far north, all my friends asked me if I’d shaken the snow off my boots yet. I don’t know why they get the idea that a city sitting only 600 feet above sea level would have snow, especially sitting on the world’s largest freshwater lake.
LOL! Having been there for more than a few winters, they get more snow than some alpine regions. My first winter (95-96) saw over 328” of snow for the season (September through May, yes, inclusive).
577 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:15:38am |
re: #565 Kosh’s Shadow
Multiple updings for Gilbert and Sullivan.
I love the way they stopped executions in The Mikado. They simply made the first person in line, the Lord High Executioner.
(And all this because adultery was a capital offense.)
You know how hard it is to find the original lyrics online, though? Every production (including the one I have on VHS at home, with Eric Idle as the Lord High Executioner) insists on updating them.
578 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:16:27am |
re: #569 Kosh’s Shadow
Iraq could say what they want, but they have no airpower. However, there is no way they’re going support an Israeli attack on Iran. They’d ask the US to do something.
And then, once the US has been asked, the Israeli planes are through, but they have to come back.
They can dump the planes at sea once they’ve completed their mission, and get picked up by a waiting Israeli ship.
579 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:16:36am |
re: #571 albusteve
why would the Iraqis deny Israel the airspace?…are you sure they would?
1) Iran has significant influence in the Iraqi government.
2) The Arab world would say Iraq is the US puppet if they let Israel fly over.
3) Iraq has taken action against government members who said Israel had a right to exist. They’re Arabs and Muslims first.
580 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:17:26am |
re: #576 Honorary Yooper
LOL! Having been there for more than a few winters, they get more snow than some alpine regions. My first winter (95-96) saw over 328” of snow for the season (September through May, yes, inclusive).
Oh, I’m well aware of the possibilities, having spent a great deal of time in the shadow of Lake Michigan’s snow clouds. But we’re experiencing a rather pleasant warm season across the Midwest right now and snow isn’t in the forecast for at least another few weeks.
Then again, this is the Midwest. I’ll get my snow tires out tomorrow. :P
581 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:18:39am |
re: #575 Land Shark
My wife is a defense attorney and she’d love to have a case that blatant.
I don’t know the details (not allowed to) but she was complaining that in today’s trial, she really had nothing to go on, but she still had to make an argument.
582 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:19:12am |
re: #572 laZardo
Aww, hell. There’s a Star Trek thread up on /y/ now.
What? Gay fanfiction based on Star Trek? That’s unpossible!
583 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:19:25am |
re: #577 JamesTKirk
You know how hard it is to find the original lyrics online, though? Every production (including the one I have on VHS at home, with Eric Idle as the Lord High Executioner) insists on updating them.
I liked that version, but I do want the original. I only have it audio only, on vinyl.
584 | albusteve Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:19:31am |
re: #579 Kosh’s Shadow
1) Iran has significant influence in the Iraqi government.
2) The Arab world would say Iraq is the US puppet if they let Israel fly over.
3) Iraq has taken action against government members who said Israel had a right to exist. They’re Arabs and Muslims first.
that’s what I was afraid of…I rans would probably consider it an act of war
585 | equable Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:20:54am |
re: #573 Dreader1962
I remember during Gulf War I after the first Scud hit Israel, we had reports of Israeli planes scrambling and flying towards Iraq. It made for some tense moments, and quick assurances were made to Israel that we would suppress the Scud launchers as a priority. All bets would have been off if any of them had chemical warheads, though.
The pucker factor was quite high. We had no idea what the IDF planes were carrying.
I’ll tell you what, I remember that vividly. I was just 14 at the time, and I remember praying to God that Israel remained patient and didn’t strike back. They were awfully pissed off and their patience was tenuous at best.
Imagine what a disaster it would’ve been had Israel struck back. Our coalition probably would have disintegrated and the nutty extremist islamic countries would have all yelled: “Yee haw! Jihad time!”
586 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:21:35am |
re: #578 JamesTKirk
They can dump the planes at sea once they’ve completed their mission, and get picked up by a waiting Israeli ship.
To make a successful attack on Iran would take so many planes that it would make a big hole in Israel’s air force to ditch so many planes.
There are too many targets in Iran for just a single group attack.
And think about the outcry if the US were to sell them a large order quickly. The UN would be pushing for an embargo on Israel, never mind just stopping arms sales.
They’ll do that anyway, but that’s a good reason for Israel not to lose a large number of planes.
587 | laZardo Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:21:57am |
re: #582 JamesTKirk
What? Gay fanfiction based on Star Trek? That’s unpossible!
Fangirls and Rule 34 are like Kevin Garnett. ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE!
/still on a boat
588 | Dreader1962 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:22:09am |
re: #575 Land Shark
I don’t know what causes it, but during my time working in criminal justice in the military, the prosecution side was always overconfident. I think part of it stems from the close relationship that they have with the law enforcement (police) side - they are non-critical of the initial arrest and investigation, which creates a feedback loop that makes the law enforcement sloppy. It’s not a malicious tendency, just an organizational weakness.
589 | Honorary Yooper Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:22:11am |
re: #553 Walter L. Newton
Ok…
Now we have an half an inch of snow.
Half an inch? Barely rates as a snow flurry. :-)
590 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:22:12am |
re: #582 JamesTKirk
What? Gay fanfiction based on Star Trek? That’s unpossible!
It must feature Sulu.
591 | John Neverbend Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:22:23am |
re: #578 JamesTKirk
They can dump the planes at sea once they’ve completed their mission, and get picked up by a waiting Israeli ship.
An interesting scenario, but I really don’t think there would be any US orders to shoot the planes down.
A key factor that’s militating against a strike is the thought in the Israeli’s minds of the ensuing global whining.
592 | tradewind Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:22:23am |
So… connect the dots…TOTUS is ’ open to bailing out / protecting the press’
[Link: thehill.com…]
You always look out for your friends. It’s like mob protection.
[Link: www.nypost.com…]
593 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:23:09am |
re: #579 Kosh’s Shadow
1) Iran has significant influence in the Iraqi government.
Iran is also behind some of the bombings which are killing Iraqis.
2) The Arab world would say Iraq is the US puppet if they let Israel fly over.
They may say that in public, but most of them won’t be too happy about Iran getting nukes either. First, because fallout from any nukes used against Israel won’t stay in Israel (and the same goes for retaliatory nukes used against Iran by Israel); and second, because Israel won’t be Iran’s only target if they become a nuclear power and want to unite the area under their rule.
3) Iraq has taken action against government members who said Israel had a right to exist. They’re Arabs and Muslims first.
As was said above, Iraq (without US assistance) has little chance of blocking the Israeli fighters themselves; they could claim there was nothing they could do. After all, asking the US for help could also raise accusations of “US puppet”.
594 | tradewind Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:24:12am |
re: #586 Kosh’s Shadow
Think about the big hole in Israel’s AF that Iran’s nukes are sure to make.
I can’t imagine that they (Israelis) aren’t going to hit them as soon as they believe they can.
595 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:24:37am |
re: #583 Kosh’s Shadow
I liked that version, but I do want the original. I only have it audio only, on vinyl.
I have a few versions, including this parody by Allan Sherman.
596 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:24:52am |
Oh, good grief! Jackassery from my denomination’s “justice” site.
You seem to think that Israel is worried about its continued existence. Israel is surrounded by hostile countries. This is partly true. Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran and Saudi Arabia have not normalized relations with Israel. (Interestingly, the reasons which they usually give as explanations for their actions is their anger over the mistreatment of Palestinians.) But, Israel has received recognition from several key players: Jordan, Egypt, Turkey and the Palestinian Authority itself. Furthermore, Israel’s own generals claim that Israel has the 4th more powerful military in the world. That combined with the fact that Israel has nuclear and biological weapons means that Israel faces no immediate threat of destruction by means of traditional warfare.
597 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:25:36am |
And more…
What about a nuclear attack? This is a very important question. I myself would be very fearful of nuclear attack were it not for one simple fact. Iran will never nuke Israel. A nuclear attack would necessitate a direct attack upon Jerusalem for the sake of destroying Israel’s capacity to retaliate. The truth is that NO Muslim, EVER, will nuke Jerusalem. It is the third holiest site in Islam! Furthermore, such an attack would kill millions of Palestinians. Ahmadenejad and the other Middle Eastern leaders claim to be defenders of the Palestinians. No leader would be able to pull it off, no matter how deranged. Iran does not want nuclear weapons for the sake of using them. Iran wants nuclear bombs because it wants to be respected as a legitimate power in the Middle East. It will never use the bombs against Israel.
598 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:25:50am |
re: #591 John Neverbend
An interesting scenario, but I really don’t think there would be any US orders to shoot the planes down.
A key factor that’s militating against a strike is the thought in the Israeli’s minds of the ensuing global whining.
And the loss of support of the US elsewhere because the US would be paying a cost in Iraq. It would be much harder to get the support of the Iraqi government.
As a result, the US might stop vetoing UN resolutions, and limit arms sales, etc.
599 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:26:49am |
600 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:26:55am |
Sorry, it keeps coming. It’s like a bad traffic accident…
Picture the thoughts of a Palestinian man living in the immediate aftermath of a total Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank: “The Israelis are gone. There are no roadblocks preventing me from going to visit my family in the next town over. The economy is picking up speed after being at a near stand-still. Many Palestinians are working over in Israel and they are bringing home good paychecks. This money is being pugged into our economy, giving me and other Palestinians jobs as well. My life has never been this good. But… it could be better. Israel could have given us even more land. The Zionists could have left the Middle East altogether. On this basis, I will once again renew my vow to destroy Israel. I will start firing rockets into Jerusalem. It doesn’t matter that my actions could cause Israel to re-invade the West Bank. It doesn’t matter that my actions could destroy all of the good things that have happened in the wake of Israel’s departure. None of this matters. All that matters is that I never make peace with these enemies.”
Are such thoughts realistic? Will Palestinians really think these things if Israel does withdraw? Undoubtedly, there will be a few crazies who will think in this way. But, a vast majority will be content.
Palestinians don’t go to bed at night thinking of ways that they can destroy Israel. They go to bed worrying about how they will feed their children.
601 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:27:11am |
re: #594 tradewind
Think about the big hole in Israel’s AF that Iran’s nukes are sure to make.
I can’t imagine that they (Israelis) aren’t going to hit them as soon as they believe they can.
Yes, but I don’t think they want to fly over Iraq to do it.
But there will be an attack before Iran gets S-300 missiles. I think some of the meetings with the Russians are saying that; don’t sell them the missiles or we’ll have to attack before they’re in place.
602 | Vicious Babushka Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:27:46am |
re: #596 Spenser (with an S)
Oh, good grief! Jackassery from my denomination’s “justice” site.
J Street is writing op-eds for your denomination’s “justice” site?
603 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:28:01am |
re: #597 Spenser (with an S)
And more…
The writer of that is still waiting for his unicorn, I’m sure.
604 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:28:09am |
re: #590 Kosh’s Shadow
It must feature Sulu.
Actually, the whole slashfiction genre started decades ago with Kirk/Spock stories. What’s funny is that they’re almost exclusively written by women for women, so I’ve heard gay men going on and on about how inaccurate they are.
605 | tradewind Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:28:30am |
re: #527 MandyManners
That tired hegemony thing.
The left loves that stuff.
606 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:28:39am |
re: #591 John Neverbend
A key factor that’s militating against a strike is the thought in the Israeli’s minds of the ensuing global whining.
Would that be man-made global whining?
607 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:28:56am |
608 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:29:15am |
re: #600 Spenser (with an S)
Sorry, it keeps coming. It’s like a bad traffic accident…
Yes, this one is complete bullshit; the Palis had days when they went to Israel and collected good paychecks; they preferred blowing up Israelis.
And because of that, [deleted]
609 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:29:49am |
re: #604 JamesTKirk
Actually, the whole slashfiction genre started decades ago with Kirk/Spock stories. What’s funny is that they’re almost exclusively written by women for women, so I’ve heard gay men going on and on about how inaccurate they are.
Wow. Somehow, I don’t think Amok Time works that way.
611 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:30:40am |
re: #596 Spenser (with an S)
Oh, good grief! Jackassery from my denomination’s “justice” site.
That would make me seriously consider leaving that denomination.
612 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:30:44am |
613 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:31:04am |
re: #595 JamesTKirk
My favorite Allan Sherman line…
“Some people think a horseshoe’s gonna bring you lotsa luck;
“A horseshoe is a lucky charm of course…
“But for every set of horseshoes, human beings use for luck;
“Somewhere in this world’s a barefoot horse…”
614 | Land Shark Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:31:57am |
re: #581 Kosh’s Shadow
The prosecution’s case was so pathetic the defense could have mounted a defence that consisted of them laughing at the prosecution while they danced the Macarena in front of the judge’s bench and it would have had no effect on the outcome. The main thrust of our deliberations was amazement at how inadequate the evidence for the prosecution’s case was. Like I said, eye opening and disturbing. I won’t extrapolate and say it was an average representative case. It’s too disturbing to even consider that.
615 | albusteve Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:32:18am |
Iran will have it’s warheads and delivery systems…there is no way around it
616 | Charles Johnson Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:32:19am |
re: #133 MandyManners
I don’t know but, I’ve been told that Avanti and IceWeasel want me to stop using it.
Argh.
I don’t like that either. I’m pretty sure I’ve mentioned this before.
Why is it necessary to use blatantly insulting terms for the President? Fine. Don’t like Barack Obama. But at least have some respect for the office of the Presidency.
617 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:33:52am |
re: #611 JamesTKirk
That would make me seriously consider leaving that denomination.
Yeah, it’s a very loud, small minority and this one works for some Quaker peace group outside the denomination.
618 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:34:16am |
re: #575 Land Shark
What the hell happened to the Eight Amendment?!
619 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:34:17am |
re: #613 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
620 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:35:08am |
re: #616 Charles
Mornin’ Charles! How’s your shoulder? You were swinging the stick a bunch this weekend…
621 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:35:09am |
re: #618 MandyManners
What the hell happened to the Eight Amendment?!
Last time I checked it’s still between the 7th and 9th!
622 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:35:41am |
re: #619 JamesTKirk
I’ve forgotten many of the Alan Sherman lyrics I know, but one stuck with me
“They’re marching through the warehouse where the drapes of Roth are stored”
623 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:36:33am |
re: #608 Kosh’s Shadow
re: #600 Spenser (with an S)
Sorry, it keeps coming. It’s like a bad traffic accident…
Yes, this one is complete bullshit; the Palis had days when they went to Israel and collected good paychecks; they preferred blowing up Israelis.
And because of that, [deleted]
Yes, I’m not as up on the settlement issue as I should be. It doesn’t help that there are a number of different things people mean when they say “settlements” and there are a good number of Israelis who are against at least one category, right?
624 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:36:58am |
re: #622 Kosh’s Shadow
I’ve forgotten many of the Alan Sherman lyrics I know, but one stuck with me
“They’re marching through the warehouse where the drapes of Roth are stored”
[Link: www.themadmusicarchive.com…]
625 | Land Shark Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:37:11am |
re: #588 Dreader1962
I’m not extrapolating to say my case is representative, but the evidence presented was an insult to an average person’s intelligence. It’s one thing to hear a story like this, it’s quite another to live it and see and hear it with my own eyes and ears. I was there!
Several times during the prosecution’s closing arguments I almost burst out laughing at them. In the jury room I found out I was not the only one who almost laughed out loud. Quite an experience I’ll never forget.
626 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:37:30am |
re: #605 tradewind
That tired hegemony thing.
The left loves that stuff.
It makes ‘em quake in their Birkenstocks.
627 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:38:09am |
I found The Drapes of Roth, but it’s not ringing any bells.
628 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:38:38am |
Can anyone help me with this one?
Today, I read a news article about George Mitchell, Obama’s envoy to the Middle East. He has ended his attempt to get the Palestinians and the Israelis back to the negotiating table. What is the issue that has blocked the process? Was it Palestinian failure to recognize the state of Israel? No! The PLO did that in the Oslo accords. Was it rockets? No! No Israeli officials are talking about rockets, bombs, security or anything like that.
Rather, the issue which is preventing both sides from sitting down is the continued expansion of the settlements. Israel claims the right to continue to build and expand settlements during the negotiating process.
629 | Vicious Babushka Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:38:52am |
re: #623 Spenser (with an S)
Yes, I’m not as up on the settlement issue as I should be. It doesn’t help that there are a number of different things people mean when they say “settlements” and there are a good number of Israelis who are against at least one category, right?
When Palestinians say “settlements” they mean:
Jews living anywhere in Israel.
But in order to persuade the Europeans, they will pretend that it means Jews living anywhere in the post-‘67 boundaries, including all parts of Jerusalem.
630 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:38:58am |
re: #623 Spenser (with an S)
Yes, I’m not as up on the settlement issue as I should be. It doesn’t help that there are a number of different things people mean when they say “settlements” and there are a good number of Israelis who are against at least one category, right?
Many Israelis agree that some outposts - “settlements” that are little more than a few trailers - should stop being constructed, but the Palis refer to anything outside 1967 borders, including large towns, and East Jerusalem, as “settlements”. And sometimes, they refer to Tel Aviv as a “settlement”, too.
631 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:39:33am |
re: #596 Spenser (with an S)
Oh, good grief! Jackassery from my denomination’s “justice” site.
Have you ever considered joining a church that focuses on Christ and his relationship to the individual as Savior?
632 | Land Shark Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:39:45am |
re: #618 MandyManners
I don’t know. Maybe it was on vacation last week. Who knows? The one thing I’m happy about is that we the jury did the best we could, we were fair and honest and we did the right thing.
633 | Vicious Babushka Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:40:27am |
re: #631 MandyManners
Have you ever considered joining a church that focuses on Christ and his relationship to the individual as Savior?
Maybe Spenser (with an S) belongs to one of the “progressive” streams of Judaism?
634 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:40:28am |
re: #631 MandyManners
Have you ever considered joining a church that focuses on Christ and his relationship to the individual as Savior?
A Christian denomination that follows Christ? Does such a thing exist??
635 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:40:30am |
I see that Mark Lloyd’s “greatest hits” are starting to circulate on the web.
636 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:40:59am |
re: #616 Charles
Argh.
I don’t like that either. I’m pretty sure I’ve mentioned this before.
Why is it necessary to use blatantly insulting terms for the President? Fine. Don’t like Barack Obama. But at least have some respect for the office of the Presidency.
I have respect for the office.
637 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:41:02am |
re: #631 MandyManners
Have you ever considered joining a church that focuses on Christ and his relationship to the individual as Savior?
My church always does, my denomination usually does, but this little blog… almost never.
638 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:41:06am |
re: #628 Spenser (with an S)
Can anyone help me with this one?
The PLO supposedly recognized Israel’s right to exist, but never really did. They refuse to recognize Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state repeatedly, last I heard was a few months ago.
That was supposed to be a condition for the Annapolis talks, but when the Palis refused, Rice still held the meeting.
639 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:41:24am |
It looks like the Obama administration is looking at reviewing the way the Federal Bank works…
“Sept. 21 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve Board has rejected a request by U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner for a public review of the central bank’s structure and governance, three people familiar with the matter said.”
[Link: www.bloomberg.com…]
640 | tradewind Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:42:11am |
re: #617 Spenser (with an S)
I have the same problem with my church nationally, but our parish has decided to ignore the moonbats at National and hope for a return to sanity.
641 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:42:39am |
re: #621 sattv4u2
Last time I checked it’s still between the 7th and 9th!
Point it out to the court system in Land Shark’s jurisdiction!
642 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:43:01am |
re: #639 Walter L. Newton
It looks like the Obama administration is looking at reviewing the way the Federal Bank works…
“Sept. 21 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve Board has rejected a request by U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner for a public review of the central bank’s structure and governance, three people familiar with the matter said.”
[Link: www.bloomberg.com…]
It’ll never happen.
643 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:43:31am |
644 | tradewind Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:44:17am |
re: #630 Kosh’s Shadow
Why don’t they focus their anger on the arabs who told them to leave their homes and rush the borders of Israel years ago? They left, and then weren’t let back home. They should be enraged at Egypt and Syria.
645 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:44:51am |
re: #591 John Neverbend
Mornin’ “Butch Deadlift”…
646 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:45:02am |
re: #632 Land Shark
I don’t know. Maybe it was on vacation last week. Who knows? The one thing I’m happy about is that we the jury did the best we could, we were fair and honest and we did the right thing.
(((Land Shark)))
647 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:45:36am |
re: #633 Alouette
Maybe Spenser (with an S) belongs to one of the “progressive” streams of Judaism?
I would be incredibly embarassed for my post.
648 | tradewind Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:46:00am |
re: #626 MandyManners
Patriotism=hegemony in their dictionary. They love jingoist also.
649 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:46:01am |
re: #634 JamesTKirk
A Christian denomination that follows Christ? Does such a thing exist??
Oh, yes. There are a few.
650 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:46:16am |
re: #643 Walter L. Newton
Isn’t this what Ron Paul has been pushing for?
This sounds a little bit different in substance. Paul is just as interested in opening some of the books.
This sounds more like a public structural / practice review.
I don’t think either has a shot personally.
651 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:46:24am |
re: #635 Pianobuff
I see that Mark Lloyd’s “greatest hits” are starting to circulate on the web.
*perks*
652 | JanglerNPL Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:46:41am |
re: #131 MandyManners
“I think it’s a remarkable document…the original Constitution as well as the Civil War Amendments…but I think it is an imperfect document, and I think it is a document that reflects some deep flaws in American culture, the Colonial culture nascent at that time.African-Americans were not — first of all they weren’t African-Americans — the Africans at the time were not considered as part of the polity that was of concern to the Framers. I think that as Richard said it was a ‘nagging problem’ in the same way that these days we might think of environmental issues, or some other problem where you have to balance cost-benefits, as opposed to seeing it as a moral problem involving persons of moral worth.
And in that sense, I think we can say that the Constitution reflected an enormous blind spot in this culture that carries on until this day, and that the Framers had that same blind spot. I don’t think the two views are contradictory, to say that it was a remarkable political document that paved the way for where we are now, and to say that it also reflected the fundamental flaw of this country that continues to this day.”
Surely you don’t think the three-fifths clause _wasn’t_ a flaw in the original Constitution. Because that’s clearly what he’s talking about. That’s why the Framers allowed a process for amending the Constitution, to rectify any flaws that would become apparent.
653 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:47:31am |
re: #644 tradewind
Why don’t they focus their anger on the arabs who told them to leave their homes and rush the borders of Israel years ago? They left, and then weren’t let back home. They should be enraged at Egypt and Syria.
Because they’re Muslims and can’t accept that Jews own any “Muslim land”.
Their leaders keep teaching them and training them to accept nothing but all of Israel.
And look at how so many people in the West believe the BS produced by the Palis.
654 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:47:38am |
Bummer. Art Ferrante died. RIP.
Movie pianist Art Ferrante dies in Fla. at 88
Advertisement
Buy AP Photo Reprints
Your Questions Answered
Ask AP: Tsunami alerts, balanced federal budget
LONGBOAT KEY, Fla. (AP) — Famed 1960s-era movie pianist Art Ferrante has died at his Florida home at age 88.
Ferrante’s longtime manager says he died Saturday of natural causes in Longboat Key, about 60 miles south of Tampa. Along with partner Lou Teicher, Ferrante recorded themes to movies such as “The Apartment,” “Lawrence of Arabia,” and “Cleopatra.”
Ferrante and Teicher were known as “The Movie Theme Team” and performed together for 40 years after meeting as children at The Juilliard School in New York.
Teicher died last year at age 83.
Ferrante is survived by his wife, daughter and two granddaughters.
655 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:48:01am |
re: #635 Pianobuff
I see that Mark Lloyd’s “greatest hits” are starting to circulate on the web.
[Link: www.fcc.gov…]
[Link: www.freepress.net…]
[Link: www.lunch.com…]
[Link: www.sourcewatch.org…]
Praise for Chavez
[Link: www.rushlimbaugh.com…]
656 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:48:24am |
re: #652 JanglerNPL
Surely you don’t think the three-fifths clause _wasn’t_ a flaw in the original Constitution. Because that’s clearly what he’s talking about. That’s why the Framers allowed a process for amending the Constitution, to rectify any flaws that would become apparent.
And it would be nice if the liberals actually went through the process of amending the Constitution when they wanted to change it, rather then just making things up that aren’t mention in there anywhere, or otherwise claiming that it’s a “living, changing document” that means whatever they want it to mean on any given issue on any given day.
657 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:49:07am |
re: #637 Spenser (with an S)
My church always does, my denomination usually does, but this little blog… almost never.
Oh, it was a blog. I misunderstood. I’m sorry.
658 | tradewind Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:49:19am |
re: #653 Kosh’s Shadow
And they do make such adorable scarves…
Huge trend at Saks. I saw a whole rack last weekend that looked as if it had been ripped from Arafish’s head and imported, right next to the pashminas.
659 | Spenser (with an S) Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:49:36am |
re: #652 JanglerNPL
Surely you don’t think the three-fifths clause _wasn’t_ a flaw in the original Constitution. Because that’s clearly what he’s talking about. That’s why the Framers allowed a process for amending the Constitution, to rectify any flaws that would become apparent.
In a broken world, that was not a flaw. It was a means of limiting the power of the slave states (who would have their slaves vote with the master), while still forming a union which they would join. This matter was very apparent even as they wrote it.
660 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:49:40am |
re: #651 MandyManners
*perks*
Here it is if you are curious.
They are pretty quick clips. I’d rather have more before and after before I render a full opinion.
661 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:49:59am |
re: #653 Kosh’s Shadow
Because they’re Muslims and can’t accept that Jews own any “Muslim land”.
Once any land has been “Muslim land”, it remains “Muslim land” in perpetuity. Today, Israel; tomorrow, Spain.
662 | Charles Johnson Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:50:46am |
re: #636 MandyManners
I have respect for the office.
Ok, then I’ll ask you directly to stop referring to the president as a “fucking commie bastard.” It’s disrespectful in the extreme, and I don’t like seeing it at my blog.
663 | SummerSong Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:51:32am |
re: #20 Silvergirl
Time to sail off in a wooden shoe on a river of crystal light.
Dream time — good night all you late nighters!
I have been waiting for the chance to say, “Sail On SilverGirl”!
664 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:52:18am |
re: #655 MandyManners
[Link: www.fcc.gov…]
[Link: www.freepress.net…]
[Link: www.lunch.com…]
[Link: www.sourcewatch.org…]
Praise for Chavez
[Link: www.rushlimbaugh.com…]
You have a Lloyd dossier?
665 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:52:38am |
re: #658 tradewind
And they do make such adorable scarves…
Huge trend at Saks. I saw a whole rack last weekend that looked as if it had been ripped from Arafish’s head and imported, right next to the pashminas.
Oy. And a place where Jews shop. Some [derogatory term]s are probably already wearing them, thinking they’re “Sooo fashonable”.
666 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:53:01am |
re: #658 tradewind
And they do make such adorable scarves…
Huge trend at Saks. I saw a whole rack last weekend that looked as if it had been ripped from Arafish’s head and imported, right next to the pashminas.
Someone there needs to be Saked.
667 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:53:55am |
re: #652 JanglerNPL
Surely you don’t think the three-fifths clause _wasn’t_ a flaw in the original Constitution. Because that’s clearly what he’s talking about. That’s why the Framers allowed a process for amending the Constitution, to rectify any flaws that would become apparent.
He was also talking about “social justice” AFTER the horror of slavery was abolished. Or, didn’t you catch that bit about being able to sit at the soda fountain’s counter but not having enough money to buy something?
668 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:54:52am |
Apocalypse Cakes… what?
669 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:55:10am |
Hmmm…
I wonder if this is the story they said was coming out this week?
EXPLOSIVE NEW AUDIO Reveals White House Using NEA to Push Partisan Agenda
670 | Charles Johnson Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:56:06am |
re: #669 Pianobuff
Another outrage of the week. Yawn.
671 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:56:31am |
re: #669 Pianobuff
Hmmm…
I wonder if this is the story they said was coming out this week?
EXPLOSIVE NEW AUDIO Reveals White House Using NEA to Push Partisan Agenda
[Link: www.daybydaycartoon.com…]
672 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:56:53am |
673 | Killgore Trout Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:56:54am |
Some good news…
Leading indicators show recession ‘bottoming out’
The U.S. recession is bottoming out and a recovery is near, economists for the Conference Board said Monday after reporting that the index of leading economic indicators rose 0.6% in August, the fifth straight increase.
674 | Kragar Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:57:09am |
Going thru the news, its becoming obvious that Obama’s plan to win in Afghanistan is to “redefine” the mission, declare victory and pull out. I’ll be suprised if we have anything more than a token force there by 2012.
676 | Dreader1962 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:57:14am |
re: #625 Land Shark
I’m not extrapolating to say my case is representative, but the evidence presented was an insult to an average person’s intelligence. It’s one thing to hear a story like this, it’s quite another to live it and see and hear it with my own eyes and ears. I was there!
Several times during the prosecution’s closing arguments I almost burst out laughing at them. In the jury room I found out I was not the only one who almost laughed out loud. Quite an experience I’ll never forget.
I’ve prepared a case at the direction of the prosecutor that charged a person with stealing a stereo and also receiving stolen property - to wit: the same stereo. I told the lawyer (and remember - military lawyers must pass the bar in a state to practice) that this presents the prosecution as unsure about the evidence. Sure enough the military judge threw the entire case out (and there were other slam-dunk charges). So much for the opinion of a PFC vs. a Captain!
677 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:57:40am |
re: #667 MandyManners
He was also talking about “social justice” AFTER the horror of slavery was abolished. Or, didn’t you catch that bit about being able to sit at the soda fountain’s counter but not having enough money to buy something?
I’m still looking for the link in My Favorites that has that transcript. It’s months’ old. Hold on.
678 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:58:24am |
re: #662 Charles
Ok, then I’ll ask you directly to stop referring to the president as a “fucking commie bastard.” It’s disrespectful in the extreme, and I don’t like seeing it at my blog.
I will.
679 | JanglerNPL Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:58:29am |
re: #656 JamesTKirk
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States…
Where in the Constitution does it give the President the authority to command the Air Force? I don’t think “the executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America” works, because if that was sufficient, then why would the framers feel the need to explicitly mention the Army and Navy? Should we halt all drone missions to Pakistan until we amend it?
680 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:58:46am |
re: #673 Killgore Trout
Some good news…
Leading indicators show recession ‘bottoming out’
Must be why the stock market is responding…
Dow 9,793.60 -26.60 -0.27%
681 | Dianna Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:59:17am |
re: #673 Killgore Trout
Some good news…
Leading indicators show recession ‘bottoming out’
Provided we don’t end up with a “bathtub” recovery, which is what some Fed person said at a lunch.
682 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:59:28am |
re: #673 Killgore Trout
Some good news…
Leading indicators show recession ‘bottoming out’
NOW can we hold off on the 90% +/- of “stimulus” money that hasn’t been printed and spent yet?
Seems as if it’s “recoverring” with TARP and free market corrections!
683 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:00:11am |
re: #678 MandyManners
I will.
Now, see, THAT’S how to handle an issue like this. Rather than flouncing and accusing Charles of being a douchebag and stifling conversation and such.
684 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:00:13am |
re: #673 Killgore Trout
Some good news…
Leading indicators show recession ‘bottoming out’
Great. Congratulations Team Obama. Cancel the rest of the stimulus spending now. Let’s avoid inflation.
685 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:01:16am |
re: #680 Walter L. Newton
Must be why the stock market is responding…
Dow 9,793.60 -26.60 -0.27%
Profit taking from last 2 weeks gains
They’ll be putting most of that money right back into other investments by mid-week
686 | Killgore Trout Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:02:05am |
re: #684 Pianobuff
I don’t think cancelling stimulus is an option. They might pull back on some of it but probably nothing significant.
687 | FrogMarch Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:02:09am |
re: #671 JamesTKirk
[Link: www.daybydaycartoon.com…]
More of our tax dollars used wisely in this wonderful economy.
688 | John Neverbend Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:02:42am |
re: #645 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Mornin’ “Butch Deadlift”…
Mornin’ bastard…who is fat (and vegetarian) - with apologies to Austin Powers.
689 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:03:45am |
re: #660 Pianobuff
Here it is if you are curious.
They are pretty quick clips. I’d rather have more before and after before I render a full opinion.
I wonder if they’re from the National Conference on Media Reform held last year. He was on a panel with Medea Benjamin, Amala Anderson and Deepa Fernandes, one of whom was a propagandist for Castro’s MFM.
[Link: www.freepress.net…]
690 | JanglerNPL Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:04:08am |
re: #677 MandyManners
Look, the point is Barack Obama said the original Constitution was flawed, because it treated slavery as an issue which was amenable to a political compromise (as Spenser said) rather than a moral imperative, and he said that this method of looking at inequality issues continues to this day. I don’t think he was saying there should be a “all black people should be able to afford soda” amendment, which I’m sure you’re not arguing he is, but then, I’m having a bit of trouble understanding what you are arguing.
691 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:04:34am |
re: #686 Killgore Trout
I don’t think cancelling stimulus is an option. They might pull back on some of it but probably nothing significant.
You’re probably right. Too many payouts for them to re-neg.
692 | badger1970 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:04:39am |
re: #674 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)
Not exactly the “hearts and minds” of the populous.
693 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:05:16am |
re: #686 Killgore Trout
I don’t think cancelling stimulus is an option. They might pull back on some of it but probably nothing significant.
Why? Why not?
I am so tired of both sides spending EVERY cent they can possibly get their hands on. If I have a project at work or at home, and it’s budgeted for $20,000 (just to use a round figure) and I can get the job done with the same results for $14,000 I would NEVER keep spending the other 6K just because I was going to anyway!!
694 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:08:09am |
re: #683 thedopefishlives
Now, see, THAT’S how to handle an issue like this. Rather than flouncing and accusing Charles of being a douchebag and stifling conversation and such.
I don’t need that abbreviation to get across my POV.
695 | Walter L. Newton Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:08:10am |
re: #693 sattv4u2
Why? Why not?
I am so tired of both sides spending EVERY cent they can possibly get their hands on. If I have a project at work or at home, and it’s budgeted for $20,000 (just to use a round figure) and I can get the job done with the same results for $14,000 I would NEVER keep spending the other 6K just because I was going to anyway!!
You would if next year you only got 14,000 for you budget because you saved 6,000.
When I worked for the DOE, if you had a budget of 1/2 million, and you came in under budget, you would find other centers in your organization that could use the money or else the money from the Feds for next year would be less.
In short, you HAD to spend what they gave you.
No shit!
696 | Creeping Eruption Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:08:54am |
re: #693 sattv4u2
Why? Why not?
I am so tired of both sides spending EVERY cent they can possibly get their hands on. If I have a project at work or at home, and it’s budgeted for $20,000 (just to use a round figure) and I can get the job done with the same results for $14,000 I would NEVER keep spending the other 6K just because I was going to anyway!!
The problem under your scenario is that people in the government will spend the other 6k to justify getting the same or increased budget the next year.
697 | Pianobuff Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:09:21am |
re: #695 Walter L. Newton
You would if next year you only got 14,000 for you budget because you saved 6,000.
When I worked for the DOE, if you had a budget of 1/2 million, and you came in under budget, you would find other centers in your organization that could use the money or else the money from the Feds for next year would be less.
In short, you HAD to spend what they gave you.
No shit!
And that, my friend, is how the game is played.
698 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:09:29am |
re: #690 JanglerNPL
Look, the point is Barack Obama said the original Constitution was flawed, because it treated slavery as an issue which was amenable to a political compromise (as Spenser said) rather than a moral imperative, and he said that this method of looking at inequality issues continues to this day. I don’t think he was saying there should be a “all black people should be able to afford soda” amendment, which I’m sure you’re not arguing he is, but then, I’m having a bit of trouble understanding what you are arguing.
Do you have even a grasp of the concept of social justice and what it entails? It has NOTHING to do with the color of one’s skin. It’s about economic redistribution.
699 | sattv4u2 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:10:48am |
re: #695 Walter L. Newton
You would if next year you only got 14,000 for you budget because you saved 6,000.
When I worked for the DOE, if you had a budget of 1/2 million, and you came in under budget, you would find other centers in your organization that could use the money or else the money from the Feds for next year would be less.
In short, you HAD to spend what they gave you.
No shit!
I know. I’ve seen it 1st hand
700 | JanglerNPL Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:11:01am |
re: #698 MandyManners
Yes, I grasp the concept of social justice. I will rephrase. I don’t think Obama was arguing for an “all people should be able to afford soda” amendment either.
701 | JamesTKirk Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:13:00am |
re: #699 sattv4u2
I know. I’ve seen it 1st hand
Similar systems exist elsewhere; I recall that the club I was a member of in college received money from the student government (which received money in the form of “student activity fees” that all students paid as part of their tuition and dispersed it to various groups and causes) and also had a “use it or lose it” policy.
702 | Kosh's Shadow Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:14:43am |
re: #695 Walter L. Newton
I’ve worked in companies that worked the same way. If you had budget, and didn’t use it, your division would have a hard time getting the budget later.
703 | Flyers1974 Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:14:56am |
re: #566 MandyManners
Well, I’m reading it again right now. It was not written to make people happy or comfortable. Considering all the flak he caught for it, he was over the target.
Sorry for the late reply.
I have no problem with books being written without regard to peoples’ happiness, etc… . To the extent some of his words are meant to recognize the ignorance of the general public regarding history, politics, etc.., or or our society being a t.v., culture, etc…, I don’t think those are radical notions. But his descriptions of US society, as “degenerate,”
“hedonistic,” “subpagan,” and headed for “ultimate degradation”
sound like Al Queda’s descriptions of the West. Obviously this book wasn’t relied upon at the time of the confirmation hearings, but either they knew something the public didn’t, or they got lucky. My opinion anyway.
704 | JanglerNPL Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:32:11am |
I think I found the segment you were looking for, Mandy:
If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court. I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order as long as I could pay for it I’d be o.k. But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf. And that hasn’t shifted. And one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.
It looks like Obama is saying that people shouldn’t rely on courts or Constitutional arguments to alleviate inequality. It doesn’t look like he’s saying the fact that “the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties” is a flaw, though. I don’t even know if this quote came from the same interview as the other one, or if they did, how far apart they were, time-wise.
705 | JanglerNPL Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:34:54am |
Sorry for the long posts, I just figure if possible I should post the entire blocks so people can see the context without having to open another window. I apologize also for debating and running, but I have to be somewhere at 12:00. I’ll try to respond to any further comments this evening.
706 | Land Shark Mon, Sep 21, 2009 10:03:49am |
re: #676 Dreader1962
I sure wish the judge in my case had thrown it out before it went to trail. I’m not a lawyer (nor do I play one on the Web), but it would have been emminently justified. I don’t know what latitude the laws of FLA give a judge in a case like this, though.
Then again, I learned a lot from this experience and was proud to be a part of that jury. We had a diverse lot of 3 men and 3 women, but each and every one performed their duties in an exemplary fashion. God bless them.
707 | MandyManners Mon, Sep 21, 2009 11:31:05am |
708 | Paul Sorene Mon, Sep 21, 2009 11:59:28am |
robertfisk460 Robert Fisk Fisks Himself And Comes Up WantingROBERT Fisk has Fisked himself. Fisk works for the dying Independent. And he’s come up wanting. Robert Fisk is heading to the Middle East with a dream…
[Link: www.anorak.co.uk…]
Your text to link…
709 | JanglerNPL Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:09:45pm |
re: #707 MandyManners
Let us leave aside for the moments the merits of “redistribution” as policy and returning to my original point, which seems to have been lost.
You posted:
H’s into positive freedoms and positive liberty, the ones whereby the government is free to do things for you, as opposed to the philosophy of negative liberty upon which our Constitution was founded.Oops. The Constitution. That flawed thing.
Never mind.
I then posted the segment of the interview wherein Obama called the original Constitution “flawed”, saying that he was referring to the specific issue of slavery and how it was handled. My main point in doing so was to try to convey that Obama’s statement about the Constitution is not as condemnable as I believe you think it is.
You then said that Obama talked about “social justice” elsewhere in the interview, a fact which I do not dispute. I do disagree, however (and so do the courts), with the contention that any form of government assistance runs counter to Constitutional principles. What is true, and what Barack Obama was talking about in the interview, is that programs of government assistance cannot be created by the courts under the theory that the Constitution endows positive liberties and requires the legislature to enact them. However, it is just as true that if the legislature does enact such a program, it will (rarely) be struck down by the courts.
710 | Throbert McGee Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:46:48pm |
re: #709 JanglerNPL
I then posted the segment of the interview wherein Obama called the original Constitution “flawed”, saying that he was referring to the specific issue of slavery and how it was handled.
A law professor who calls the three-fifths compromise a “flaw” in the Constitution without explicitly reminding listeners which states wanted to count blacks as full persons and which states wanted to count them as non-persons is a law professor who’s not coming close to doing his fucking job.
(Because which states were on which side of the compromise is somewhat counter-intuitive, and even your average college grad who once upon a time did well in high-school history class typically gets it wrong unless reminded about how the debate actually went down.)
711 | Throbert McGee Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:50:00pm |
re: #709 JanglerNPL
What is true, and what Barack Obama was
talking aboutlamenting in the interview, is that programs of government assistance cannot be created by the courts under the theory that the Constitution endows positive liberties and requires the legislature to enact them.
FIFY.
712 | JanglerNPL Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:21:49pm |
re: #711 Throbert McGee
And one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change.
He wasn’t lamenting the courts’ inability to bring about redistributive change. He was lamenting the civil rights movement’s overreliance on the courts.
And FWIW, the “redistributive change” he’s talking about here was apparently in response to a question about the court case San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, concerning a school district which received below-average amounts of funding due to the low income levels of its residents. The court said that the method of apportionment was not a Constitutional issue, because education is not a fundamental right, and income-based discrimination must pass a rational-basis test rather than one of strict scrutiny. And, to repeat myself, Obama was not lamenting the Supreme Court’s decision in this case, he was lamenting the fact that the people who brought the suit relied on the courts for a remedy rather than taking the matter to the legislature.
713 | JanglerNPL Mon, Sep 21, 2009 3:32:28pm |
re: #710 Throbert McGee
That may be so. He could have gone into more detail. But “Barack Obama didn’t explain a Constitutional issue as thoroughly as he might have” isn’t a talking point I imagine would generate a lot of outrage.
714 | iceweasel Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:40:05pm |
re: #662 Charles
Ok, then I’ll ask you directly to stop referring to the president as a “fucking commie bastard.” It’s disrespectful in the extreme, and I don’t like seeing it at my blog.
It’s also inaccurate. Obama is not a ‘commie’.
I would also like to respectfully suggest that people consider retiring the WAB nickname for Michelle Obama. I can understand that some people dislike her, but I think that nickname is offensive. Moreover, I don’t quite get the reason for attacking the FLOTUS. It made (some) sense when it was Hillary, who was involved in policy creation (HillaryCare). But Michelle Obama has hardly done anything except plant a garden, help out at soup kitchens, give inspirational speeches to young girls— the very traditional kind of FLOTUS stuff, and things that, dare I say, people would laud if done by a Republican FLOTUS.
Finally, even if people feel these nicknames are funny or justified, I think they ought to consider how it makes LGF look to new readers and to others. It’s like that nickname for Rachel Corrie. It spreads throughout the blogosphere and people start saying it represents LGF’s views or Charles’— no matter how often he publicly distances himself from the use of the term and makes clear that he doesn’t like it.
(FWIW, I haven’t seen people talking about the use of FCBBHO or WAB elsewhere— yet — but it could easily happen, especially with all the new traffic flooding in from the left now. Some of that traffic isn’t openminded and would love to find another reason to tell people not to read here. Why help them out?)
My .02.
715 | JacksonTn Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:44:21pm |
re: #714 iceweasel
It’s also inaccurate. Obama is not a ‘commie’.
I would also like to respectfully suggest that people consider retiring the WAB nickname for Michelle Obama. I can understand that some people dislike her, but I think that nickname is offensive. Moreover, I don’t quite get the reason for attacking the FLOTUS. It made (some) sense when it was Hillary, who was involved in policy creation (HillaryCare). But Michelle Obama has hardly done anything except plant a garden, help out at soup kitchens, give inspirational speeches to young girls— the very traditional kind of FLOTUS stuff, and things that, dare I say, people would laud if done by a Republican FLOTUS.
Finally, even if people feel these nicknames are funny or justified, I think they ought to consider how it makes LGF look to new readers and to others. It’s like that nickname for Rachel Corrie. It spreads throughout the blogosphere and people start saying it represents LGF’s views or Charles’— no matter how often he publicly distances himself from the use of the term and makes clear that he doesn’t like it.
(FWIW, I haven’t seen people talking about the use of FCBBHO or WAB elsewhere— yet — but it could easily happen, especially with all the new traffic flooding in from the left now. Some of that traffic isn’t openminded and would love to find another reason to tell people not to read here. Why help them out?)
My .02.
IW .. it made some sense when it was “Hillary” … really … so you choose what women can be criticized? … Michelle gave speeches before and has after the election … and what nickname for Rachel Corrie are you talking about? …
717 | iceweasel Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:48:58pm |
re: #715 JacksonTn
IW .. it made some sense when it was “Hillary” … really … so you choose what women can be criticized? … Michelle gave speeches before and has after the election … and what nickname for Rachel Corrie are you talking about? …
No, Jackson. I’m saying that it makes some sense to criticise a FLOTUS for political reasons when she’s taking an active role in forming or suggesting policy, as Hillary did with Hillary Care.
It’s utterly irrelevant that Michelle Obama has given speeches. So did Laura Bush.
Are you seriously going to try to defend the use of the name ‘whiny-ass bitch’ to refer to Michelle Obama? Or any FLOTUS?
I suspect you know damn well what nickname for Corrie I’m talking about, and I’m not going to use it now or ever.
(Hint: it’s in Zombie’s LGF dictionary, for starters).
718 | iceweasel Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:50:04pm |
re: #716 Jimmah
Hi Iceweasel :)
I need to ask - what does W.A.B stand for?
Hi Jimmah-ski. :)
Whiny-ass bitch. Charming and trenchant political commentary, don’t you think?
How are you today, honey?
719 | JacksonTn Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:53:55pm |
re: #717 iceweasel
No, Jackson. I’m saying that it makes some sense to criticise a FLOTUS for political reasons when she’s taking an active role in forming or suggesting policy, as Hillary did with Hillary Care.
It’s utterly irrelevant that Michelle Obama has given speeches. So did Laura Bush.Are you seriously going to try to defend the use of the name ‘whiny-ass bitch’ to refer to Michelle Obama? Or any FLOTUS?
I suspect you know damn well what nickname for Corrie I’m talking about, and I’m not going to use it now or ever.
(Hint: it’s in Zombie’s LGF dictionary, for starters).
IW … and you are saying Michelle has not been a “political” person? .. really … the days of a first lady being non-political are over … there are many many speeches she gave suggesting that she was anything other than a political part of her husband’s campaign … and the crap you said about her just “planting a garden” … right … keep pushing that … and I have a hospital in Chicago you can buy …
720 | Jimmah Mon, Sep 21, 2009 5:59:44pm |
re: #718 iceweasel
Hi Jimmah-ski. :)
Whiny-ass bitch. Charming and trenchant political commentary, don’t you think?
How are you today, honey?
Ah right - thanks for the definition. That’s really pretty disgusting, and totally unjustified; definitely something that needs to be dropped.
I am fine today, babe :) - how about you?
721 | iceweasel Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:00:24pm |
re: #719 JacksonTn
IW … and you are saying Michelle has not been a “political” person? .. really … the days of a first lady being non-political are over … there are many many speeches she gave suggesting that she was anything other than a political part of her husband’s campaign … and the crap you said about her just “planting a garden” … right … keep pushing that … and I have a hospital in Chicago you can buy …
Sorry, Jackson. As usual, you’re wrong. Not only that, you’re incoherent.
If you reread your own comment, you may realise you just argued that MO was NOT a political part of her husband’s campaign. It’s no wonder you miss the point so badly, when you appear incapable of both reading comprehension and basic literacy.
These are the questions under discussion: Are you defending calling Michelle Obama a ‘whiny-ass bitch’? Do you think that is useful and trenchant political commentary? Do you think it makes LGF look good?
I haven’t forgotten that you also consider it useful and insightful commentary to call me a ‘nasty bitch’ — and that you have yet to apologise for that either, or even admit it was wrong. So it wouldn’t surprise me to see you think it’s perfectly acceptable to call the FLOTUS that.
722 | JacksonTn Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:06:56pm |
re: #721 iceweasel
Sorry, Jackson. As usual, you’re wrong. Not only that, you’re incoherent.
If you reread your own comment, you may realise you just argued that MO was NOT a political part of her husband’s campaign. It’s no wonder you miss the point so badly, when you appear incapable of both reading comprehension and basic literacy.
These are the questions under discussion: Are you defending calling Michelle Obama a ‘whiny-ass bitch’? Do you think that is useful and trenchant political commentary? Do you think it makes LGF look good?
I haven’t forgotten that you also consider it useful and insightful commentary to call me a ‘nasty bitch’ — and that you have yet to apologise for that either, or even admit it was wrong. So it wouldn’t surprise me to see you think it’s perfectly acceptable to call the FLOTUS that.
IW … believe it or not … I stand by everything I say … today or yesterday … so to your comment about my previous postings … I stand by my comments … I ask you to go back and read any of my postings and find where I ever used the terms WAB … go ahead …
I said some time ago that I was done with even criticizing anything about Obama’s family, his dog, his food, or the way he styles his hair … or his wife’s clothing … but I will never ever dismiss the things she has said and you can make fun of me until the cows come home about my grammar whatever … this video right here did it for me … “her tone” … really … well … I have had issue with Michelle’s tone for a long time …
So, I have thought about it … and I don’t like Michelle’s “tone” and never have … she is the First Lady and I respect that but that does not mean I like her or ever will … and I do not like her husband … not a new thing for me … I can separate the issues … it will get pretty interesting going forward .. I am patient …
723 | iceweasel Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:15:07pm |
re: #722 JacksonTn
IW … believe it or not … I stand by everything I say … today or yesterday … so to your comment about my previous postings … I stand by my comments … I ask you to go back and read any of my postings and find where I ever used the terms WAB … go ahead …
Why did you feel the need to criticise me for disliking the term WAB, Jackson? And for making the extremely relevant point that its use is harmful to LGF?
There are two possibilities here: Either you yourself endorse the use of that term by others (even if you don’t yourself use it), or you are determined to pick fights with me, about anything, in your inimitable incoherent wildly flailing style.
It’s good to know you’re ‘standing by’ your prior comments— including the ones that have earned you two timeouts thus far. Very impressive.
It’s also interesting that you’ve totally disregarded the points I made about how it could hurt LGF’s reputation or traffic. It suggests you care about neither, just as you care less about the questions actually under discussion, and more about engaging with me.
This never ends well for you. I suggest you engage on the issues, perhaps with others, and consider simply not talking to me since you don’t like me. I never initiate conversations with you, you may have noticed. You have a need to keep initiating them with me.
724 | iceweasel Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:18:39pm |
re: #720 Jimmah
Ah right - thanks for the definition. That’s really pretty disgusting, and totally unjustified; definitely something that needs to be dropped.
I am fine today, babe :) - how about you?
Mystifies me why anyone would defend that term.
I’m getting better all the time, sugar. :-) Some music for you:
725 | JacksonTn Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:21:51pm |
re: #723 iceweasel
Why did you feel the need to criticise me for disliking the term WAB, Jackson? And for making the extremely relevant point that its use is harmful to LGF?
There are two possibilities here: Either you yourself endorse the use of that term by others (even if you don’t yourself use it), or you are determined to pick fights with me, about anything, in your inimitable incoherent wildly flailing style.
It’s good to know you’re ‘standing by’ your prior comments— including the ones that have earned you two timeouts thus far. Very impressive.
It’s also interesting that you’ve totally disregarded the points I made about how it could hurt LGF’s reputation or traffic. It suggests you care about neither, just as you care less about the questions actually under discussion, and more about engaging with me.
This never ends well for you. I suggest you engage on the issues, perhaps with others, and consider simply not talking to me since you don’t like me. I never initiate conversations with you, you may have noticed. You have a need to keep initiating them with me.
IW .. never really ends well for me? … that I have to laugh at …
This is crazy ..
“Why did you feel the need to criticise me for disliking the term WAB, Jackson? And for making the extremely relevant point that its use is harmful to LGF?”
I have never said anything about your “dislike” of the WAB thing …
Who says who can “initiate” conversations? … and you really over state your importance … your side of the party decided that it was in the “best interest of the party” to take over … so now YOU OWN IT … you deal with the crap … we will just sit by and watch … like I said … we are patient …
726 | iceweasel Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:29:59pm |
re: #725 JacksonTn
IW .. never really ends well for me? … that I have to laugh at …
This is crazy ..“Why did you feel the need to criticise me for disliking the term WAB, Jackson? And for making the extremely relevant point that its use is harmful to LGF?”
I have never said anything about your “dislike” of the WAB thing …
Who says who can “initiate” conversations? … and you really over state your importance … your side of the party decided that it was in the “best interest of the party” to take over … so now YOU OWN IT … you deal with the crap ... we will just sit by and watch … like I said … we are patient …
Laugh away, Jackson. :) Remember, we’re laughing at you, not with you.
These are the questions under discussion: Are you defending calling Michelle Obama a ‘whiny-ass bitch’? Do you think that is useful and trenchant political commentary? Do you think it makes LGF look good?
Do try to keep up.
727 | JacksonTn Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:36:06pm |
re: #726 iceweasel
Laugh away, Jackson. :) Remember, we’re laughing at you, not with you.
These are the questions under discussion: Are you defending calling Michelle Obama a ‘whiny-ass bitch’? Do you think that is useful and trenchant political commentary? Do you think it makes LGF look good?
Do try to keep up.
IW … go ahead and laugh … I do not care … do you think something like you laughing at me makes my world change … no it does not … I live life … work … go to bed and get up and do it again the next day … the likes of you laughing at me … I wear it like a badge …
You just go ahead … do what you do … we will be here watching from the sidelines … bit by bit … it will all come down on the progressives who tried to cram everything down the throat of Americans at warp speed … you have your day in the sun … I will stay where I am … waiting … I have not given up on “my side” … we are the center … you are not … I am not a far left or far right … we believed for many many years … your side took control and slammed it right into the face of too many … too fast … ya’ll think you are so smart … we will see …
728 | Jimmah Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:41:15pm |
re: #724 iceweasel
Mystifies me why anyone would defend that term.
I’m getting better all the time, sugar. :-) Some music for you:
I can’t understand what is in it for decent people to use terms like that against the first lady. The right has undergone a strange inversion in which it is suddenly subversive to support the president and ones patriotism is measured by ones lack of respect for the office of the President and his family. Very sad, and extremely damaging to conservatives, of only they’d wake up and see it.
And as for Dan le Sac - what a kick ass tune that is, sweetie :)
This is the beat that my heart skipped when we first met
Now that I’ve heard it, it leaves me with a kind of regret
No disrespect
We just left a lot of people upset
729 | iceweasel Mon, Sep 21, 2009 6:44:52pm |
re: #727 JacksonTn
Unless and until you have something to contribute to the topic at hand, why don’t you take your random mindless abuse of me and those you consider progressives and “cram it down your own throat”, Jackson? I’m merely quoting you there, btw.
Your comments are like reading the transcripts of your audition tape to be Glenn Beck’s replacement: crazed rambling, dire yet vague and unfocussed threats, unchoate hate.
And who the fuck do you think you are to tell me I’m not the centre?
Please. Why don’t you go hide under your bed for the rest of the Obama administration, cowering and muttering about how you’re ‘waiting’ and prophesying the change that’s gonna come and show all them smart librhuls whut reel UhMerkin’s want, huhhuh, ayup. That’ll larn em reel gud.
Take your phone and charger so you can keep calling in to the Glenn Beck show.
Now until you want to engage on the actual topic, why don’t you piss off?
731 | Charles Johnson Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:05:51pm |
There’s only so much of this kind of crap I’ll put up with, and I just reached the limit.
732 | Jimmah Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:06:52pm |
re: #727 JacksonTn
IW … go ahead and laugh … I do not care … do you think something like you laughing at me makes my world change … no it does not … I live life … work … go to bed and get up and do it again the next day … the likes of you laughing at me … I wear it like a badge …
You just go ahead … do what you do … we will be here watching from the sidelines … bit by bit … it will all come down on the progressives who tried to cram everything down the throat of Americans at warp speed … you have your day in the sun … I will stay where I am … waiting … I have not given up on “my side” … we are the center … you are not … I am not a far left or far right … we believed for many many years … your side took control and slammed it right into the face of too many … too fast … ya’ll think you are so smart … we will see …
Ok…I said I wasn’t talking to you again until you have apologised for your disgusting remarks towards iceweasel before your first timeout. But I will say this to you: It’s really a bit much for you to expect someone to be civil towards you when you have made and repeatedly stood by such comments to them. Do you understand that? Do you understand how “you are a bitch and I stand by that statement and will not back down” is not a sound foundation for rational discussion?
If you are unable to do this in the interests of getting back on a civil basis for debate, then I would suggest that you stop bothering iceweasel altogether, especially since you are now just repeating the same old nonsensical drivel that got you a timeout the last time.
Seriously, you are like a tiny fish splashing around in a puddle at her feet, trying to annoy her with water. It’s just tiresome.
734 | iceweasel Mon, Sep 21, 2009 7:31:42pm |
re: #733 Danny
I’m guessing too much intoxicant.
I think that was a factor in the past as well. Certainly amnesia— just before her second timeout she denied she’d ever had a first timeout. Both were for exactly this kind of behaviour, although I missed her deleted comment just now.
I asked her repeatedly to stay on the topic; I asked her finally to just engage with other people. She was never able to do it. Some people want to be blocked. Recently I’ve come to notice that some people prefer a long, extended version of a flounce. This looks like one of them.
re: #728 Jimmah
Isn’t it a lovely song , though?
Empowerment is paramount to how I can begin to mount
A plan that I can implement
to make a dent on ignorance
Instead of drunk belligerence
and the dissidence of miscreants
Especially in this instance
with the never ending persistence
to use the words in each sentence
as if they were blunt instruments
Time for another song, though…keyboard kitty again!