LGF

-RetweetHillary: "On Behalf of the Common Good"

Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 9:05:20 pm PDT

Well, at least she’s honest.

Headlining an appearance with other Democratic women senators on behalf of Sen. Barbara Boxer, who is up for re-election this year, Hillary Clinton told several hundred supporters — some of whom had ponied up as much as $10,000 to attend — to expect to lose some of the tax cuts passed by President Bush if Democrats win the White House and control of Congress.

“Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you,” Sen. Clinton said. “We’re saying that for America to get back on track, we’re probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.

Advertisement

427 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 mbruce  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:06:39pm

Once a commie always a commie.Her and Bill are two Maximum Marxists.

2 Innismir  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:10:36pm

As we've all seen this picture (I hope):

"No wonder they make them shut up and wear bags over their heads"

3 HULUGU  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:10:53pm

they are not maximum marxists--they are mastercard marxists

4 Ward Cleaver  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:11:38pm

"I'm from the government, and I'm here to help you".

Remember, it's a privilege to pay taxes. It's the government's money, not yours.


/yeah right

5 Dar ul Harbarian  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:12:23pm

After a comment like that the Republicans will make hash of here in any presidential bid.

6 lazytart  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:12:35pm

All hail the porcine one.

7 Alouette  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:13:05pm

Since I have been "outsourced" for almost a year, I expect Hillary to give me 25% of the proceeds of "Lying (oops--"Living") History and Bill to give me 25% of the proceeds of "My Lies (oops--"Life").

That shouldn't be too much to ask. It's not like I'm demanding 50% or more. That would be too greedy.

Hillary can send me the pearl necklace and the pearl earrings and the gold bracelet she is wearing in this picture and I won't complain.

8 happycynic  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:13:12pm

That one seemingly innocent phrase is the root of tyranny

9 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:14:44pm

And I'm sure is willing to assure us it hurts her a lot more than it does us.

10 zulubaby  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:15:31pm

I don't know how they stand each other.

11 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:15:35pm

that is "I'm sure she is willing to assure us it hurts her a lot more than it does us."

12 Techie  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:16:13pm

I for one welcome our new tax-collector overlords...

/LLL

It is refreshing to see honesty in politics for a change.

13 SoCalJustice  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:16:46pm

That was fairly inartful of her. Almost un-Clintonesque.

But another quote in the article is bothering me too:

"He was here so dad gum much when he was president that outside of Arkansas, his highest level of support is probably the Bay Area," said Martha Whetstone, executive director of the Bar Association of San Francisco and a longtime friend of both Clintons.

I think there's a law on the State books that if a Californian allows the term "dad gum" to escape his/her lips, they will be driven to the state line and told never to return.

And if there isn't, well dad gum, there should be.

14 Orbit Rain  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:17:10pm
We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good

Mrs. Clinton, go read the Wealth of Nations and get back to us when you have a fucking clue.

15 Ward Cleaver  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:18:30pm

OT - Joe Wilson on The Late Show with David Letterman

Well, awhile back I stopped watching al-Nightline and unsubscribed from their mailing list, after it became a nightly shot of anti-American, anti-Bush propaganda. I switched over to watching The Late Show with David Letterman.

Tonight, Letterman holds up a copy of The Politics of Truth, by former ambassador Joe Wilson, about his bogus "investigation" about the documents claiming that Iraq attempted to buy uranium before the Iraq War.

Great, The Late Show turns into al-Nightline. Another show to scratch off of my list.

16 SwampWoman  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:20:46pm

Well, ain't that special, she's going to take MY money away for the "common good". Whose common good, pray tell?

17 zombie  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:21:00pm

"From each according to his abilities,
to each according to his needs."
-- Karl Marx

Now, what if you have a lot of abilities, AND you need a lot to achieve what you do? I guess you give all your money to the government, and then they give it all back to you. Or maybe we could skip a couple steps and let everybody keep what they earn.

I for one support that radical notion of a 0% income tax for individuals, supplanted by a national sales tax. 98% of the governmental bureaucracy and paperwork would be eliminated, but the national treasury would get the same revenue every year (if the national sales tax was accurately determined). Though I do favor keeping an "income tax" for non-individuals, such as corporations and other businesses.

Anyway, that's my two cents. Hey I said it was MY two cents! Now give it back to me, Hillary!

18 sunstroke  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:22:57pm

Hey! What's the matter with you guys? Don't you know a deal when you see one? That's all the convincing I need. I'm in! Sign me up!

No, really. I'm not kidding here. Honest.


/barf

19 J.D.  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:24:29pm

Never trust a woman with stolen furniture in her home.
Thomas Sowell tries to make it simple.
Low Taxes Do What?

20 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:25:14pm
21 Egfrow  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:27:17pm

Communism and Socialism seem to be getter more popular again. Looks like we didn't really win the cold war and it really just shifted gears into the covert. Our nation has been possibley fataly infiltrated. She is divided against her own sons and her own purpose for existance. Compromise and collectivism have taken hold. Welfare is at an all time high. We have spent more on the welfare system than on defense. We are losing out on productivity and enginuity to 3rd world coutries. Our education system is dwindleing as well as our attention span as a nation...Wait! Ooo! Out Back Jack and Joe Millionaire is on TV. Gotta go. Later.

22 Mr. E. Train  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:27:18pm

combine this one with " I voted for the $18 billion, before I voted against it"

and the election should be a slam dunk... but Im assuming a rational voting public. Silly me.

23 Dianna  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:28:21pm

To quote Menkin, I think:

Whenever A proposes to take something from B for the benefit of C, A is a scoundrel.

Hello? Sound like anyone you know?

24 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:28:50pm

OT

But has anyone been hearing the stories about the Iraqi police busting heads and brutalizing hoods since the recent turnover.

I understand that the street merchants are enthusiastically happy about the pistol-whippings and whatnot, but I wonder if that is a sustainable model.

After all, isn't that the same kind of behavior that got them in the pickle in the first place?

Just wondering...

25 Dianna  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:29:51pm

Mr. E Train, I think that was $87 billion.

26 Connecticut Yankee  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:32:29pm

Trouble with HRC is that she can't recognize UNcommon goods-- like freedom-- when she sees them.

27 orson  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:32:57pm

Hillay, new spokesman for the common good

28 quark2  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:33:41pm

Hillary speaks of the common good. The common good of who or what? How ambiguous and ingenious!
Like we're all just dance with joy, hand out sweets and fire our guns into the air over having the government take more of our money from us.
I just loved working 12 hour shifts, lots of time more than that so I could have big brother poke his hand into my wallet and take the money I've worked my ass off for away from me...for the common good.
Hilliary is nothing more than a damned communist.

29 jinnderella  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:34:01pm

Well, zombie, y'know, it takes a village...

30 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:34:07pm

#24

World News > New Iraqi police unit uses old tactics

On Sunday, the most notorious criminal haven in central Baghdad was the target of the first major operation mounted by the new Iraqi interior ministry's Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) team and members of the new intelligence services.

They went house-to-house, rounding up known criminals and terrorists, reports UPI. Well over 100 suspects were identified, arrested, beaten and processed in the raid.

And residents of Tahrir Square neighbourhood, commonly known as the "Thieves Market", seemed shocked as doors came crashing in and metal batons and plastic hoses were prominently and somewhat gratuitously deployed to send a message to Baghdad's criminal elements.

31 Cornholio  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:38:34pm
Hillary Clinton told several hundred supporters -- some of whom had ponied up as much as $10,000 to attend -- to expect to lose some of the tax cuts passed by President Bush if Democrats win the White House and control of Congress.

"Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Sen. Clinton said.

This p.o.'s me to no end. The super rich like Warren Buffet supporting higher taxes. Hey, billionaires can afford for the government to take 50% of their earnings. They still have $500 million left over! It's the average guy (and girl) who gets royally screwed when the government grabs half their paycheck.

And one day Hillary will be president :-p

32 Lady of Shalott (ylreveb)  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:39:57pm

Echoes of the Grand Inquisitor: "so men rejoiced that they were again led like sheep..."

"Oh, we shall persuade them that they will only become free when they renounce their freedom to us and submit to us. And shall we be right or shall we be lying? They will be convinced that we are right, for they will remember the horrors of slavery and confusion to which Thy freedom brought them.

Freedom, free thought, and science will lead them into such straits and will bring them face to face with such marvels and insoluble mysteries, that some of them, the fierce and rebellious, will destroy themselves, others, rebellious but weak, will destroy one another, while the rest, weak and unhappy, will crawl fawning to our feet and whine to us: "Yes, you were right, you alone possess His mystery, and we come back to you, save us from ourselves!"

… When the Inquisitor ceased speaking he waited some time for his Prisoner to answer him. His silence weighed down upon him. He saw that the Prisoner had listened intently all the time, looking gently in his face and evidently not wishing to reply. The old man longed for him to say something, however bitter and terrible.

But He suddenly approached the old man in silence and softly kissed him on his bloodless aged lips. That was all his answer. The old man shuddered. His lips moved. He went to the door, opened it, and said to Him: 'Go, and come no more... come not at all, never, never!' And he let Him out into the dark alleys of the town. The Prisoner went away."

"And the old man?"

"The kiss glows in his heart, but the old man adheres to his idea."

--F. Dostoevsky, “The Grand Inquisitor” (from The Brothers Karamazov

33 zombie  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:41:28pm
#29 jinnderella
Well, zombie, y'know, it takes a village...

It takes a whole lot of villages to grow enough grain to ship back to Moscow so they won't label us reactionaries. In return, they send us orders to grow more grain next year. Now, that's a fair trade, isn't it? After all, this bread made out of chaff and sawdust doesn't taste half bad.

34 Cornholio  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:42:45pm

#19 J.D.  

Never trust a woman with stolen furniture in her home.

LOL! And when Hillary runs for president, that will be the sticker on my car.

35 Lady of Shalott (ylreveb)  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:44:44pm

Thinking of the Grand Inquisitor makes me think that there are ... very big forces at work in all this.

And I don't just mean political parties.

"Together, through the ages, we have fought the long defeat." --Galadriel

36 D. Edgren (the Merciless Infidel)  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:47:03pm

Let me get this straight...

Hillary wants to take my stuff and use it as she sees fit because she knows better than me?

The same Hillary that didn't have a clue about Bill. Or what to do with him after she had the clue handed and read to her...

Ha-ha. Ha-ha-ha. Ha-ha-HAA-ha-ha.

She's nuts. She's also politically fucked from the point she uttered those words.


D. Edgren

37 Jeff S.  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:48:12pm

"And if we should happen to have the same futures broker, I have instructed him to park all my losing trades in your accounts, on behalf of, well...my good.

Oh, and did you know I was named for Sir Edmund Hillary, even though I was six years old when he became famous for scaling Mount Everest? It's true, up until then my parents just called me Hey You!."

/Her

38 TalkinKamel  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:50:28pm

#16 Swamp Woman

"Whose common good, pray tell?"

Why, Yassir Arafat and the PLO, of course, and all those poor Palestinian refugees! We send them money all the time! And then there's the two-billion we send Egypt every year, so they'll love us (which they don't), and all the foreign aid we give out to, oh, so many, many, deserving nations around the world, not to mention all the welfare we pay out to poor, hapless victims of capitalism, right here in the USA, and the UN, which provides such wonderful programs as Oil for Food, and---and---and---

/Head explodes, from too much sarcasm!

/. . . But fortunately I was able to glue it back together.

39 zombie  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:51:40pm

I am using ancient rabbinical magical spells to construct a golem made from equal parts of Alan Keyes, Pim Fortuyn, and Victor Davis Hanson. Oh, what a golem it will be!

40 zombie  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:57:51pm

Look on the bright side, folks: Hillary will seize control of the Senate, raise taxes, then Bush will use all that extra money to buy some more AC-130 gunships and Daisy Cutters. Thanks for the munitions, Hil-baby!

41 Albertadude  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 7:58:41pm

Lady of Shalott

Powerful posts...I just finished the Brothers Karamazov last month...

And I too fear you are right...events are happening that are very very powerful behind the scenes that are not too the common good of us...

One can't but wonder what a man like Orwell would say too all of this?

Thanks

Proud Albertan

Pissed off Canadian

42 Mike P  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:01:11pm
We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.

So when are she and Bill going to deport themselves?

43 mbruce  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:03:51pm

Zombie,I love your "silver lining" approach.(#40)

44 HULUGU  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:09:04pm

she can do anything she wants --but--she better not step on my--uh-- blue suede shoes

45 odin  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:09:11pm

The trick is to stop thinking it is your money

46 HULUGU  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:10:51pm

can you imagine if nancy reagan said this--they were after her for wanting to buy a new set of china for the white house

47 HULUGU  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:12:48pm

her 2008 campaign song will be "expropriation"--sung to the tune of carly simon"s "anticipation"

48 Connecticut Yankee  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:13:27pm

How much of Teh-RAY-sa's money is Mrs. Bubba going to take for the common good? Not to mention the five mansions, 7 SUVs, two motorboats, private jet, etc. etc.

49 HULUGU  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:16:32pm

she's a "commongoodest"--21st century version of "communist"--plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose

50 Dave Ray  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:17:45pm

[Link: news.bbc.co.uk...]

don't you get the feeling to say "ah shuddup already" when you read this!

51 HULUGU  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:20:27pm

make that "commongoodist"--i'm frothing and i can't spell

52 quark2  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:23:01pm

I hope those words she so casually uttered haunt her the rest of her political career.
She is the only other person I can think of right now that scares me worse than Kerry as president.

53 Lady of Shalott (ylreveb)  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:26:43pm

#50 Dave Ray

Rowan Williams is a prize jackass. I can't believe he's the "spiritual head" of my church.

He is a succubus on the Church.

/spit

54 ördög Johnson  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:38:39pm
55 AZIslamophobe  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:41:01pm

Oh Hillary how I despise thee! This woman wants us on a one way track to socialism. This quote will be spun by her minions I'm sure saying she was only talking about Bush's tax cuts but there is a problem there. It was plural and not singular. This one qoute has stuck with me all day. What does she mean? Guns? Income? Freedom of speach? Will the common good end up being a sorry bunch of people that have no freaking desire in life to work hard and make a decent income.

I truelly fear for this country with the rhetoric comming out of these democrats mouths. Where it will lead we do not know.

By the way, hello. I'm new to posting but have been here for quite a while. The knowledge here is very impressive.

56 quark2  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:43:34pm

@54 ordog Johnson

Which is why I use either mozilla or firefox. :)
If I could I would uninstall IE to keep it from ever being used again on my system. You named it right, microcrap

57 NTropy  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:44:02pm

But…wait?!?! I thought only John Ashcroft was taking things away from us for the common good. Ohhh, no! That's for good of "greedy corporate oil barons", or so the wannabe Leninites tell us.

#17 zombie

You forgot the corollary…

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others
George Orwell

#31 Cornholio

The super rich like Warren Buffett don't pay taxes. They set up trusts which pay them tax free wages. Gotta love those loopholes.

#36 D. Edgren (the Merciless Infidel)

She's nuts. She's also politically fucked from the point she uttered those words.

One can but wish. If she has anywhere near the teflon her doorstop producing, tree killing husband had, the subject will never even be mentioned

58 quark2  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:47:46pm

@55 AZIslamophobe

Welcome minion. :)

The battle is always unending, when you're in the fight for freedom. Always there will be those that wish to overlord and control every faction of life.
Knowing who your enemy is, is half of the battle. Now, if we could just get Bush to utter those most important words!

I'm off to sleepy land...night all

Charles, thank you so much for all the hard work you've put into this, one of the most successful blogs I've ever seen!

59 zulubaby  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:48:13pm

Can you imagine if we have Kerry as president and then Hillary? Sorry, ugly thought, I know.

60 its jake  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:50:05pm
"I've never shaken the hand of a president," said Thomas, who added that he had one grandma who couldn't stand Clinton and one who thought he was the best president ever.
"Even better than George Washington," said Thomas

What the hell happened to our education system that Clinton can be compared to George Washington?

Screw Clinton!!! (but you'll have to get in line).

61 NTropy  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:50:10pm

#54 ördög Johnson

Ahhh and Cingular Wireless, my carrier, in their infinite wisdumb, has managed to make their online bill paying MSIE only. It's the one and only reason it's still on my Mac.

Oh, I called customer service today to complain but the poor gal on the other end was just a phone rep. She in no way had anything to do with the web site and probably will have no way to communicate my disgust at this garbage even if she were so inclined. AND there's no way, either by phone or on their web site, that I could find to contact the appropriate people to b*tch to.

62 zulubaby  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:51:14pm

Jeff S. (#37)

Oh, and did you know I was named for Sir Edmund Hillary, even though I was six years old when he became famous for scaling Mount Everest? It's true, up until then my parents just called me Hey You!."

LOL! They are such pretentious tools.

63 its jake  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:54:40pm

I want to point out that George Washington loved the Nation, whereas William Clinton loved himself.

64 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:54:41pm

My favorite Hillarism:

I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers. We are the president.
65 its jake  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:55:06pm

#64 - mine too.

66 Geepers  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:55:58pm

zulubaby,

Can you imagine if we have Kerry as president and then Hillary?

Thanks, now I'm going to have nightmares.

67 ajf  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:56:41pm

Wouldn't be easier to just ask all these well-off, generous, liberal do-gooders to GIVE their excess for the common good? I mean, can't she just put up a webpage with PayPal donation button?

68 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 8:57:14pm

addendum to #64

a "f---king Jew bastard"

used in a 1976 campaign is a close second.

69 zulubaby  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:02:32pm

Geepers, sorry, but I had to say it out loud in a superstitious kinda way. Besides, I don't see why I should be the only one tortured by my thoughts ;-)

70 ördög Johnson  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:05:49pm

#53 Lady of Shalott

'nother OT
Ays definition of occupiers at Iraq at Glance


Congratulations to Iraq and Iraqis on this great day.. A day which is considered a big blow on the heads of those who call the United States and the coalition: ‘occupiers’.. Well.. thank you very much for the ‘occupiers’.. Those who helped us in liberating our country from the tyranny, the ‘occupiers’ who liberated Iraq on the 9th of April, the ‘occupiers’ who sent Mr.Paul Bremer as we did not have a governor at that time..the ‘occupiers’ who helped us in forming a governing council.. The ‘occupiers’ who helped us in the interim constitution.. The ‘occupiers’ who stood against the terrorists.. The ‘occupiers’ who helped us in forming and training our army...etc.. then those ‘occupiers’ handed over the sovereignty to the Iraqis... they are the best ‘occupiers’ I’ve ever seen.. I hope they’ll ‘occupy’ the countries who are in need to be improved !
71 Geepers  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:08:10pm

zulubaby, I see. Could you add some sort of evil curse to the superstition is you only ever say it once?

72 ördög Johnson  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:11:00pm

Compare Iraqi blogs with utterly disgusting Newsweek sewage from the other side.

Bletch. Going to take a shower...

73 zulubaby  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:13:01pm

Geepers, saying it out loud dilutes it. Or something like that. It's hard to explain.

74 Geepers  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:20:44pm

zulubaby, so long as its bad juju for them both I can live with it, .. I guess. ;-)

75 Baldy  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:21:52pm

You know, if we didn't have all of the EVILLL Bush tax cuts, what would the economy be like? Or the stock market? I have a few dividend-paying stocks, and am thankful for the "tax cuts for the rich." I am not rich (I have a small Laverne & Shirley-type apt), but I wish I were, as I'm sure many people do. What is wrong with having money? I would like to take care of myself, and I'm planning on leaving what I have left for a grandchild of a beloved co-worker (he is mentally retarded). OH, and Barbara Boxer has an ad on DailyKos.

76 Daybrother  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:28:07pm

#61 NTropy

Try Safari with debug menu on. Use IE as user agent.
Type the following command in Terminal (while Safari is NOT running):
% defaults write com.apple.Safari IncludeDebugMenu 1

77 Baldy  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:29:07pm

Why are Dems so careless with OUR money? Could it be that most of them pay NO income taxes (don't approx 1/2 of Americans pay no income taxes?) ? Then, there's the stupid "progressive" tax rates. Which are absolutely idiotic. Even Russia has a flat tax.

78 NY Nana  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:31:48pm

#59 Zulubaby

Can you imagine if we have Kerry as president and then Hillary? Sorry, ugly thought, I know

Now I will have nightmares, and it's all your fault! BTW, wash your keyboard out with soap, young lady!

G'nite...to sleep, perchance to have a massive nightmare?

79 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:32:05pm

OT

SADDAM HANDED TO IRAQIS

The former dictator will appear in court on Thursday, accused of genocide and crimes against humanity.
80 Albertadude  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:35:01pm

Regarding this comment by Hillary...I tell you, this is one Femnazi that scares me...hell all femnazis are vile but Hillary is the Queen...

This will come back to badly haunt the dems in November and Hillary whenever this elite degenerate decides to run!!!

Thanks

82 ballantrae  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:39:14pm

#72 I'm going to download that and print it up.

I want to have it on hand the next time some fool says "what liberal bias"?

That article is a disgusting, filthy, miserable piece of propaganda.

-ron

83 zulubaby  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:39:25pm

NY Nana, I'll get the bleach to my keyboard immediately!

Sweet dreams :-)

84 Toaster  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:42:09pm

You know, in a perfect and just world, Bill Clinton would contract a terminal STD and then give to Hillary... Sigh... Alas, this is not a just and perfect world... Guess we're going to have to stop this Elitist Bitch the old fashioned way: at the ballot box...

I do try to look on the bright side of the Clintons still being around on the political scene... One thing I can say for them is that they're always entertaining.

85 NTropy  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:44:53pm

#76 Daybrother

Thanks but no joy. I already had the debug turned on for some reason. I hadn't run Safari Enhancer or anything like that on this machine either as far as I remember. Especially since it had caused trouble on my old machine.

I must say, my online experience with Sprint was much better than it's ever been with Cingular. And I HATE when stuff is written specifically for that lousy, bug ridden, insecure steaming pile of DUNG.

86 aboo-Hoo-Hoo  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:46:41pm

Isn't this called 'skipping with bill' or some such?

jayzus, when the quote was first posted I thought, nooo way. Just one of those rumors. To think we have 4 months with a few days change until the election day is a sure guarantee of some very entertaining Deansqué or Algoulish dhimmicrat moments. How fun!

Slightly off-topic, I just noticed that GW is having a great time at the Nato summit.

He may be testing the theory that the fwrench have become to close with their beloved 'sploding militants or whatever their calling them today.

I'm sure we all read/heard about GW getting Chirac worked into a tizzy earlier, resulting in Chirac's having one of his 'special moments' and telling GW off. GW evidently tried holding the button down and made another call for Turkey's EU inclusion.

Anyone hear of Chirac having, maybe, a terminal violent release of energy, gas, liquids, solids, etc...later?

gee, I just hate seeing the fwrench being in another lose-lose proposition to which they appear to have developed an affinity. /not

87 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 9:55:24pm
88 Right Wing Animator  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:00:26pm
I want to point out that George Washington loved the Nation, whereas William Clinton loved himself.

Well he and Monica loved him...

(Ack don't throw anything at me for the weak joke)

And on Kerry being magically elected, I've already decided to leave the country as long as he's in office..Hillary being somehow voted in would just extend my visit to the foreign country...

She doesn't honestly see anything wrong with this kind of statement? I mean as you have all pointed out, it's boarder line communism and all that mess..

89 zulubaby  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:01:15pm

Rayra, I thought you'd like these.

90 jinnderella  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:04:36pm

#88 Right Wing Animator: I thought you were an anime fan-- Kerry can never be elected-- He is a Demon (not the good kind)! :)

91 Right Wing Animator  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:06:15pm

#90 jinnderella

Heh, I always figured he'd sold his soul..

92 Chana  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:07:05pm

Quick - whoever is on - I need a thread about the Guardian's anti-semitism.

I am searching through old pages but can't find one now that I need one.

I am chatting with someone who WORKS for them and said they have "diverse political opinions".

Anyone awake? (I'm not... making this more difficult)

93 PDM  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:11:00pm

Here is one Chana:

[Link: www.littlegreenfootballs.com...]

94 Chana  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:12:43pm

#93 PDM


oooh good one.

This person and I have a good working relationship - I hope I am not about to end it...

Thanks

95 PDM  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:13:33pm
96 zulubaby  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:14:18pm

Chana, there are lots of threads about the Guardian.

97 jinnderella  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:15:53pm

#91 Right Wing Animator:
You saw Princess Mononoke, right? Both Hilary and JohnKerry touched the source demon, Clin-ton. The chance cannot be stopped, only slowed.

98 Jeff S.  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:16:13pm

#62 zulubaby

We may laugh, but I'm afraid the joke's on us. They lie with impunity because they know they'll get away with it. Whether it's bald-faced lies such as the Edmund Hillary fabrication, the hubris of the Travelgate firings, or the petty thievery and staffers' vandalism that marked their departure from the White House, nothing ever sticks to these people, the true Teflon President(s).

99 PDM  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:17:26pm

#94 Chana,

You're welcome. The link in #96 is all you'll need though. Good luck.

100 Mojo Jojo  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:18:10pm

#92 Chana

Google is your friend.

Guardian Spew

My condlences for having to chat with a Guardian employee.

101 jinnderella  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:18:16pm

Oops, I meant the 'change' cannot be stopped. My shameful, endless spelling errors.

102 Mojo Jojo  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:22:00pm

That's "condolences". Just a mention of that rag causes me to lose my spelling ability.

103 Right Wing Animator  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:25:39pm
You saw Princess Mononoke, right? Both Hilary and JohnKerry touched the source demon, Clin-ton. The chance cannot be stopped, only slowed.

Heh...that's a disturbing way to put it, though I take it these two won't have the good ending the movie did ( I always hate about studios, they always seem to leave you largly hanging..)

true Teflon President
This sounds like a band name to me...
now opening for the True Teflon Presidents, it's the Lying Lefties and Moore the Hutt and the warped Views

104 Chana  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:31:36pm

PDM and zulubaby:

google - why didn't I think of that?

I need sleep.

Thanks a lot.

105 TmjUtah  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:35:44pm

An earlier poster remarked that these remarks were almost remarkably Un-Clintonesque in their clumsiness.

Is it possible that they don't like the poll parity they see, and are giving a wee nudge?

Whatever Kerry, MSM, Michael Moore, and a couple hundred thousand moonbats think, the Democrat party's plans for Kerry end this November.

If you just remember that the party is comprised of Bill, Hill, and Terry MacAullife's checkbook, it's pretty easy to understand.

She can say anything she wants. She won't get called on it.

106 jinnderella  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:36:54pm

#103 Right Wing Animator: Studio Ghibli! My favorite is Totoro, or maybe Spirited Away...Den Beste is awesome on anime as metaphor-- his new site has a great post up on Chaos Theory (BTW, I am planning on arguing with him about it)-- but he is the god of anime around here.
I did not think it was a happy ending. I preferred the Forest Gods.

107 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:38:14pm

OT

CALLING CHIRAC'S CHARADE

In the face of unceasing French attacks on American foreign policy, President Bush has struck back in a way that is deeply embarrassing to France's President Chirac.
108 Right Wing Animator  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:41:18pm

Okay so it wasn't a "good ending" in the usual sense, but as far as the 'heroes' go, it was a good ending more or less, I was a fan of the wolves myself.

TmjUtah
You live in Utah or are you just from here?

and she might get called on it but I don't think anyone would care..

109 Right Wing Animator  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:44:06pm

I'm off to sleep, my computer screen is blurring on me..
Goodnight everybody

110 jinnderella  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:47:17pm

IMHO, even the dems don't want kerry to win-- it would only complicate hilary's run. If she must wait for 8 years, well, she is looking a little long in the tooth. TV cameras are not kind to aging XX beings. Maybe Kerry is only a stalking horse for his party.

111 Fenway_Nation  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:48:50pm

Production I.G. is the one behind one of my favorite titles, all you Right Wing animators! Ghibli's always a treat for the eyes, though...

112 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:52:42pm

I've always been an Otomo fan. Since the motorcycle fight in Akira, I was hooked.

113 jinnderella  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 10:56:51pm

Gee, i hope we're still allowed to say g'nite to people?
Goodnight Right Wing Animator!

And goodnight al qittus sa'il-- LOL, the ironing is still delicious!

114 BRUTUS  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 11:09:51pm

To be fair about it, she is saying nothing that controversial. Everyone knows that Republicans prefer small government and less monies pumped into social programs while Democrats prefer larger governments with more monies pumped into social programs. It is a defining marker between the two parties and always has been. Furthermore, to be fair about it, the Democratic party does not tow the communist line. I guess the Democrats version of government is similar to that of Canada, the UK or Australia.

As Charles said, "at least she is being honest about it."

Anyone who has read my prior posts knows that I am not a Troll. The problem is that when we magnify small issues to giant proportions, we dilute the strength of our voice with respect to the real issues. This, in my opinion, is a non-issue. That is, to the extent it is an issue, it is an issue that has always divided Democrat from Republican and always will, but certainly nothing to villify a person over.

115 Spiny Norman  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 11:33:55pm

BRUTUS,

It's the hypocricy that pisses us off. She and the rest of the Limousine Liberals and Mastercard Marxists already have their wealth and Income Taxes hardly effect them. There is no "Wealth Tax" to speak of, and most of the Trust Fund Tuhrayzas out there get a large proportion of their income through tax-exempt bonds. In the Kerrys' case, it's about $5 million a year, tax-free. Should Kerry be elected and his tax proposals go through, the value of their bond holdings would also increase substantially, as higher tax rates make tax-exempt bond more popular as a shelter.

116 Cognosus  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 11:34:13pm

Brutus,

I've nothing against your having an opinion. However, this is certainly an issue.

I really can't find anything to say on this point; it's more than annoying; it's infuriating. As someone already posted, Karl Marx wrote, "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."

The former part is what I have a problem with. Switch the two clauses around, maybe, and you'd have something... from each according to his needs (take less from the needy), to each according to his abilities (pay super-geniuses a hell of a lot).

I guess the Democrats version of government is similar to that of Canada, the UK or Australia.

Yes, but the GNP of the U.S. is higher than all of those countries put together. We also have about half the unemployment of any one of them -- only slightly less than Australia, but still less.

117 Spiny Norman  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 11:36:55pm

*affect*


PIMF, damnit, it's late.

118 Carolynn  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 11:40:49pm
Can you imagine if we have Kerry as president and then Hillary?

Charles,
Would this fall under the particularly offensive category?

119 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 11:45:42pm
120 Sojourner  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 11:47:25pm

Jinni,

Goodnight.

I mean, GAZE...

121 Rayra[deleted]  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 11:51:46pm
122 big L  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 11:52:19pm

Yea, fair-the-well, brothers and sisters-- listen to a story of a fellow pilgrim, who went astray, She was slovenly and a lay-about. Her work habits were poor and she expected us to support her! Yes brothers and sisters, her name was Common Good and she was lazy and of the devil...

/Hill telling Colonial stories

123 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 11:55:59pm

OT

'They are Not the Victims of Israeli or American Aggression; Therefore, They are Not an Issue for Concern'

This is how an approach of indifference towards others outside the circle of conflict with foreigners, and of permitting their murder, is spread as you read and write about the Darfur crisis and consider it an artificial issue, or one unworthy of world protest.
124 Stormi  Tue, Jun 29, 2004 11:59:59pm

From Kragar's link

France and the other European powers that oppose Turkey's inclusion believe — though it is rarely said publicly — that the E.U. should remain an organization of exclusively Christian countries.

Chirac is high if he thinks France is a Christian country anymore. Hell, there are probably more active Christians in Turkey.

125 Stormi  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:06:08am
does not tow the communist line

OK, I have a bone to pick here. One does now tow a line, unless you are physically picking up, say, a rope, and pulling it. In the sense that Brutus is attempting to use the word, he should be using toe.

126 someguy  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:07:05am

This announcement was brought to you by the Committee Of People Who Know What's Good For You(TM).

127 Stormi  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:07:55am

Meh!

One does NOT tow a line...

128 Kalev  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:09:54am

"Marxists"?!!! How on earth can you possibly - even jokingly - think of equating withholding tax cuts to the well off to Marxism?! There are loads of daft, damnable, damaging and dangerous things done in the name of liberalism and socialism; there are also crazy ideological bug bears on the right, one of them being that force feeding the already wealthy with more money is somehow a Good Thing. Taxation, like all things, should be in moderation - making the wealthy poor helps no-one and is immoral. However, tax cuts as well should be in moderation and should be affordable given the socio-economic context of the time and place. If someone's wealthy then let them pay more tax for the common good - because they, too, are included in the common good. They, too, will benefit from more effective policing and public services that (if not run by bleeding hearts who want to excuse every vice) aim at giving the less privileged a greater opportunity at generating wealth (for themselves and, thus, for others). Finding the balance between taxation levels and public necessity is difficult, yes. But to dismiss a reasonable option out of hand is the triumph of ideological petrification.

129 Stormi  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:13:25am
force feeding the already wealthy with more money


Force feeding money to the wealthy. Uh huh. Are you high? No, seriously... are you?

130 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:20:07am

#128 Kalev

Attitudes max all the difference. I've got no problem with paying taxes. I have a major problem with left wing idiotlectuals speaking at $10,000 dollar a plate dinners saying I need to pay more taxes when I work my ass off. Adding the further implication that the average citizen is too dumb to know whats best for them and should give up their money to support programs for drug abusing serial unemployed single parents or studying the effect of owl farts on the ozone layer and you can't give me one frickin reason or scenario where I'll support these assholes.

131 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:22:13am

that should have read "makes the difference", working on a caffeine buzz.

132 JWarrior  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:31:29am

Hilary has been taking tax lessons from her old mate Tony!

133 jinnderella  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:35:31am

Rayra, Kragar, yes, Akira was the First! And the Holy Macross!! I grew up watching Lin Min Mei and her drunkard cousin Lin Kyle after school! :)
I actually had a course in anime and japanese cinema as an undergrad-- I have a total passion for anime! It is the best!

134 Shira  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:41:33am

I haven't read all the threads today (time-zone challenged and all that) so for all I know someone may have already posted this, but according to the AP as reported in the Jerusalem Post, Saddam Hussein has been transferred to the Iraqis, together with other high-ranking officials of the former regime, and his trial will be televised. He will be making his first court appearance on Thursday.

135 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:44:39am
137 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:53:02am
138 Baldy  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:54:54am

There is something wrong when some people pay no income taxes, yet populate a party that desires to increase them for the rest of us. People care about things they pay for...

139 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:56:58am

#137 Rayra

see post #123 above

140 Elcid  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 1:02:32am

There ought to be one day - just one - when there is open season on senators.
Will Rogers (1879-1935)

141 Colt  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 1:10:30am

I love that comments like that are unusual in America :-)

142 Beagle  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 1:38:28am

Good morning! Saddam handed over

I hope he gets his daily undies on his head. Hell, I hope I do.

143 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 1:41:16am

#128 kalev --- and why should Princess Hillary be the one to decide what the common good is?

144 scaramouche  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 1:47:30am

Hillary "Robin Hood" Clinton. Maybe she can serve the common good by "taking things away" from mega-bucks First Lady-in-waiting Theresa Heinz Kerry. She seems to have a lot of scratch to spare.

145 scaramouche  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 1:55:58am

OT: I hate it when Bush panders to his RoSBP audiences. Here he's telling university students in Istanbul that embracing reform needn't mean adopting "the cultural excesses" of America. Disparaging your own culture won't win you any hearts and minds abroad; it will only make them hate you more, and perhaps alienate some of those folks back home enjoying all the "cultural excess".

146 Beagle  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:09:42am

#145 scaramouche

American audience: "Hollywood sucks." (the 30% who have GWB voodoo dolls stick in another pin) (intelligent moderates wince) (religious conservatives look skyward for rescue craft)

Istanbul* audience: "Exactly. That is why we must kill all of you infidels who will not submit to peace."

*Formerly Constantinople, please update maps. (I get confused sometimes)

147 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:11:08am

Anybody know how long the Bush = Hitler ads were on the MoveOn.org website.


My LLL brother claims Kerry's internet manager had nothing to do with the ads, they were part of a contest, and MoveOn.org did not approve. I recall seeing one of them at the MoveOn.org website, but I don't know how long they were actually up.

Today my brother emailed back with some quote from Arlen Specter (R D-Pennsylvania) about how the acts was being abused and how terrible Ashcroft was. There will be no convincing him.

148 Thom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:14:04am

#128 Kalev

Hearing a politician say that she wants to take things away from you for some undefined "common good" doesn't scare the shit out of you??

Have you been so brainwashed by wolf-in-sheep's clothing socialism/collectivism that you willingly let them take your money?! And then thank them for the "services" they provide??

The "common good" is best served by vigorous, raucous individualism and free markets. Not nationalization of wealth as Hillary would have it.

{Oh yeah - and abolish the income tax as well. Is there anything more odious or immoral than punishing the producers of wealth?}

149 Ayatollah Ghilmeini  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:14:50am

Two words: Animal Farm

For those of you not intimately familiar with Orwell's novel, Democrat supporters are the sheep, the politicians are the pigs, the working wealthy are the horses and the Republican leadership are the farmer.

150 Dar ul Harbarian  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:15:29am

I propose a Saddam Death pool be started.

I say he will be executed by July 15.

$5

151 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:20:05am

#150 Dar ul Harbarian

From the news coming out, he is still in physical US custody, just legally in Iraqi custody. They say they want to try some others first, build up the case and make an example out of him. I say next year, spring time at the earliest.

152 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:24:36am

Of course the great thing about inherited wealth, is once the big tax bite happens at the time of inheritance (and the Kennedy type rich set up trusts and the such to minimize that) its yours. Interest/dividends may be taxable, but once again Kennedy rich means good lawyers and accountants.

Heinz-Kerry and Ted Kennedy (D-Chappaquidick) won't mind a 50 or 60% max tax rate that much at all.


BTW, it is not a sign of Hillary's stupidity that WJC has been screwing everything with legs and boobs since they married. She got into that marriage because WJC was a rising star, and it has worked brilliantly. As Dick Morris has suggested, and various web sites have also claimed, Hillary is either lesbian or bisexual. I suspect she had company some of the nights that Bill was out chasing Arkansas state employees around their desks.

153 Colt  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:28:12am

#148 Thom

How is (was?) Egypt?

154 scaramouche  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:30:18am

Hillary always struck me as being one of those look-but-don't touch kind of gals--icy, cerebral and sexless.

155 Colt  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:31:43am

Israeli Supreme Court orders new fence route to ease Arab suffering

Dany Tirza, the army's chief planner of the route of the barrier, said the decision would delay construction "certainly by many months."
156 Colt  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:33:13am

The Israeli Supreme Court must be truly out there if Amram Mitzna (Labour) is saying things like this:

12:29 Labor MK Amram Mitzna: Fence ruling shows High Court is the true wall defending Israel
157 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:34:11am

#148 Thom

Hearing a politician say that she wants to take things away from you for some undefined "common good" doesn't scare the shit out of you??

Let's also remember what Queen Hillary's idea of the common good is.

Her 1993 Health Care Plan would have abolished the private practice of medicine in the United States. Her health plan included prison terms for doctors who helped patients without government authorization.

And when told that the costs of her plan would bankrupt many small businesses, she sniffed, "I can't be responsible for every under-capitalized business in America."

158 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:35:56am

OT


Will be driving (in a car, the boss needs the company Silverado diesel 4WD to go to our recompletion in Vermilion parish to supervise our simple recompletion up hole which has turned ugly, with multiple casing leaks and squeezes) down to near Cuero, TX to watch a couple of our old wells being plugged and abandoned. A new landowner brought the property and mineral rights, and didn't want oil wells marring his scenery. So 30 or 40 barrels per day of Texas oil production will be permanently lost, as it is doubtful anyone will ever pay in the ballpark of $200k to redrill wells near there for 15 to 20 BOPD production each.

I hope I don't get stuck.

Major flooding and heavy rains throughout Texas.

Disasterous river flooding along Frio, Sabinal and Nueces rivers.

Sabinal River at Sabinal, TX four orders of magnitude higher than usual flow

159 scaramouche  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:36:17am

#149 Ayatollah Ghilmeini

Two words: Animal Farm

"All Americans are equal, but some Americans are more equal than other Americans."

160 Bill Dalasio  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:36:41am

Ahh...the dirty little secret of American politics. The super-rich are rarely Republican and almost never conservative. Ms. Clinton spouting off the rhetoric of sacrifce at a $10K / plate dinner should clue anyone in. The law increasing taxes Hillary would ask for would almost certainly include some innocuous sounding provision about "carryforward of certain ongoing expenses relating to..." or somesuch. The bright young men and women at Goldman or Morgan Stanley will be looking into the provisions before the legislation is even in debate. I very much doubt that anyone in the audience, the primary market for those bright young men and women on the Street, will pay an additional dime in taxes. Who will? Oh, the hardware store owner who still carries the business as a sole proprietorship, the young M.D. who, after internship, residency, and a couple of hundred grand in college and med school bills is starting to make a little bit,...you get the picture.

161 Thom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:37:33am

#153 Colt

Still here. Fine so far, although I wouldn't want to live here.

For one thing, the air pollution makes my lungs hurt! A curious factoid: in Cairo the lead-on-particulates air pollution is equal to 60% of the same pollution in the entire US! (Hopefully I won't contract Pb poisoning. LOL.)

162 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:38:18am
163 Elcid  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:38:58am

Ed Moran

"My LLL brother"

Ed, I had a brother that sounded as yours does, and as many have indicated here, that relatives do.

Chuck, (my bro) died of brain cancer last year. While I found his 'thinking' and 'politcal stances', truly bizzare and laughable, I sure do miss his looniness.

My real pleasure was taking his money on a golf course.

164 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:42:00am

#162 V the K

I thought Hillary was the official licker?

165 Colt  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:50:57am

#161 Thom

Wow. Did Egypt sign Kyoto? :-)

166 Thom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:51:27am

#157 V the K

I was unaware of the prison terms, but it is unsurprising. Independence of thought or action is a grave threat to the socialist utopia Hillary would bestow upon us, or any socialist utopia.

---

To my #148:

Is there anything more odious or immoral than punishing the producers of wealth?

I should have added:

... and using the revenue generated by those fines and penalties to reward the indolent, the non-producers, who merely consume?
167 scaramouche  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:53:19am

OT: The UN symposium on anti-Semitism. At least the UN is acknowledging the problem, even if it's being done in a sheepish, half-hearted way. Too bad the UN has been intstumental over the years in perpetuating and expanding the problem.

168 Thom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:54:34am

#165 Colt

Hmmm ... Dunno, lemme look into that.

(Actually, they must have because there are no tree-hugging loonies protesting the savaging of the environment.)

/riiight

169 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:56:31am

Bad news for Gordo, Lame Stain and the other tools ... Allawi: Saddam connected to Al Qaeda

170 BRUTUS  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:58:10am

115 and 116

It's the hypocricy that pisses us off. She and the rest of the Limousine Liberals and Mastercard Marxists already have their wealth and Income Taxes hardly effect them. There is no "Wealth Tax" to speak of, and most of the Trust Fund Tuhrayzas out there get a large proportion of their income through tax-exempt bonds. In the Kerrys' case, it's about $5 million a year, tax-free. Should Kerry be elected and his tax proposals go through, the value of their bond holdings would also increase substantially, as higher tax rates make tax-exempt bond more popular as a shelter.

First, being right of center, I cannot begrudge a man (or woman) his wealth. Second, democrats would argue, and somewhat justifiably, that Bush's tax cuts do not benefit the middle class as much as the rich. A middle class employee receiving a few hundred dollars back from the IRS gains a minor, but in no event, "Freedom 55" windfall. The windfalls received by the affluent, however, are far more meaningful. I am not saying that I agree with this argument, merely that it is legitimately made. Also, regardless of whose in power, there will always be tax shelters for the affluent to exploit.

I see no problem with having two (or more) differing views on how best to tax the US - I do, after all, live in a democracy where this kind of thing is encouraged. The problems I have with the left extend beyond traditional party lines - they extend to things like like Kerry's flip flops, like Michael Moore's lies, like Rall's shameless (and in my view, treasonous) cartoons disparaging the good name of a fallen hero, etc...

I really can't find anything to say on this point; it's more than annoying; it's infuriating.

That may be so, but it is infuriating because you hold a different view from certain other Americans. I do not begrudge other Americans to hold different views than my own, but only to the extent that their views do not threaten or harm myself, my family, my country or most importantly, the principles on which this country stands. When airports refuse to profile muslims and actually limit the number of muslims they will search to 2 per flight, then I am threatenned by the wilful blindness of the left... then I get infuriated. When Moore portrays OBL as a modern day Paul Revere, then I get infuriated. When Hillary says that she will do what every other democratic president in history has done, I shrug my shoulders.


125

I stand corrected - toe the line.

171 PostalWorker  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:58:40am

I'm off to the airport to see my kid off. Next stop Ft Jackson and a rude surprise.

It's "for the common good". I can't stand Hillary C. She is such a smug bitch. I bet her kid never serves in the military, thank god.

172 Beagle  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:03:11am

Now, jes' one second har.

Tha "Common good" or, sah, "rights of society" are just legal fictions used to restrict individual rahts.

The only demonstrable rights in a laboratory are individual rights.

Course, I'm just a country lawyer. I'm not used to wranglin' with high-priced legal talent like Hillary Clinton (who is a Marxist).

173 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:05:46am

OK, this will be my last fish for a hat tip, but this article kind of gets me right in the schadenfreude French wine-growing region in worst crisis in 50 years as sales plummet

What got me is this para right at the end of the story.

For many, Bordeaux wines are over-rated and over-priced. According to Malcolm Gluck, writer of the Guardian's Super plonk column, Bordeaux is "a fatuous circus, run by spin doctors ... and those sycophantic wine writers whose main preoccupation is maintaining the myths ".

Fatuous circus? Preoccupation with maintaining the myths? Is he talking about Bordeaux or Chirac's government?

174 donna  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:07:30am

If it were really for our good, she'd be in Chappaqua baking cookies.

175 peace be upon me  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:09:42am

OT
Carpet-humper says: more Islam please!

[Link: www.arabtimesonline.com...]

176 Thom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:14:49am
Second, democrats would argue, and somewhat justifiably, that Bush's tax cuts do not benefit the middle class as much as the rich.

LOL. Reason #361 why the income tax should be abolished:

Taxation as a means of redistribution of wealth for purposes of social engineering.

Closely followed by Reason #362:

Bureaucrats (the mob) deciding who gets whose money and why.

The blitheness with which some accept this outrage on our freedoms is more than alarming, it is downright sickening.

Yes! Let's give communism one more chance! Surely it'll work here!

{puke}

177 Smit  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:16:39am

#149 Ayatollah Ghilmeini

For those of you not intimately familiar with Orwell's novel, Democrat supporters are the sheep, the politicians are the pigs, the working wealthy are the horses and the Republican leadership are the farmer

So the Dogs are DU Posters?

;)

178 Axiom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:20:06am

Hillary's psuedo-marxism isn't under the table anymore. She's an out and out Marxist from the cadre school of Saul Alinsky. Her comments are nearly identical to those of past union bosses that would fight for its members but skim millions of dollars off the top for all their friends.

The Bush family are assholes, but the Clinton's are worse.

Hillary is the finger to the wind Senator.

179 Nim Chimpsky  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:23:23am

Ok, gang. Repeat after me: "Liberals always know what's good for everybody else."

180 Joel  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:32:54am

Socialism pure and simple.

181 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:34:22am
182 merav  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:37:40am

Thom,

Did you get to visit Egypt's "1973 War Museum?" If so, how was it?

OT: INSURGENTS: CAPTURED MARINE HAD DESERTED

www.nytimes.com/2004/06/30/international/middleeas t/30MARI.html

There are a number of things I find disturbing about this article. One of them of course, being the soft-label "insurgents." But even more alarming is the idea that the marine was handed over to "the bad guys" by people who worked on his U.S. base.

What are people with such close ties, and sympathies, doing with access to a US military base?

How well are the local employees vetted?

183 Beagle  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:40:46am

#175 peace be upon me

If Islam were a basketball player, Muslims would play it 48 minutes every game until it died.

Hmmm? Am I trying to say something by that?

At this point, having studied some Islam, I'd pick virtually any other organized religion on the face of the Earth, were a "gun to my head" as someone pointed out the other day.

*Jehovah's Witnesses approach my door*

Me: "Hey, I was just doing some comparison shopping and I've got a Mormon and a Baptist already here, have a seat!"

184 andrew2  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:45:19am

HMrs. Clinton is a communist. See, she admitted to taking for the common good. Question: How on Earth does she know what good is?

Seems the captured Lebannese Marine is a Deserter.


Marine Deserter NYT

If he is in fact a deserter, I sympathise a whole lot less with his plight. Probably the first in USMC history.

185 merav  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:45:25am

Fellow, LGF'ers,

Does anyone have a subscription to {barf} "The Nation" magazine online? Reason being, I want to read the winning poems from the DISCOVERY contest this year. Although the left-wing rag does post some of its drivel online, it withholds the poetry results for paying subscribers.

Even if I HAD spare US bucks, I wouldn't spend it on that LLL, Israel bashing baby wipe. They DO, however, sponsor an excellent national poetry contest, so if anyone has access and doesn't mind posting it, I would be oh-so-grateful.

Thanks!

186 Thom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:46:46am

#182 merav

I haven't been there yet, but I hope to next week.

Not to worry, there will be pictures and wry comments when I get back.

187 merav  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:54:16am

andrew 2, #184,

Even if he IS a deserter, I still sympathize with him. According to the article, he started falling apart after he saw his sergeant blown to bits. It's hard to say what kind of effect that could have on a person, even a Marine.

What he was (apparently) kidnapped FOR, was his status as a Marine. And what he's facing beheading for, is being a US Marine. If they gave a #$%@ about his Muslim status, they wouldn't be holding him. To them, he's first and foremost a US Marine.

So for that, (and the fact that my dad was a Marine,) I feel a great deal of pity for him. Yeah, he messed up. He deserves to be court-martialed. But he doesn't deserve the fate his captors have planned for him.

188 scaramouche  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:56:25am

OT: Oy vey! As if Flatulence 9/11 wasn't bad enough, must we now contend with the "Michael Moore of the right"? Hot-and-cold-Neo-Com-cabal-conspiracy theories, courtesy Pat "Israel Sucks" Buchanan.

189 scaramouche  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:59:35am

#185 merav

Does anyone have a subscription to {barf} "The Nation" magazine online?

I guess it's worth a try, but it's kinda like asking the MoveOn crowd if they have a subscription to The Wall Street Journal online.

190 andrew2  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:01:05am

'187 MEARV

Well said. My father was a US Marine, still is. But I still sympathise a lot less with him. I don#t however want him decapitated though. Just thrown in the brig for a couple of Also, is it possible that he could have planned to help his Muslim brothers ambush some Marines?

191 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:01:09am

The Marine may or may not be a deserter. If the [bigoted word]s holding him are smart, they'd use him for anti-US propaganda. The threat of death would probably make him say anything, if he was indeed a deserter.


But they like killing too much. Even if he spouts the bin Laden party line, they'll still probably kill him.

BTW, my wife and my combined income is well under $100k. We're pretty solidly middle class, and the Bush tax cuts saved us a couple of thousand dollars on our 2003 taxes.


So it isn't just the rich who benefit.

192 merav  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:04:59am

Thom,

I'm looking forward to your report! :-)

193 Enkil  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:07:35am

This one is easy people...

The "Common Good" is having liberal Democrats in office, as opposed to the dangerous state of things now under Republican control. In order to do that she needs votes, and since Democrats can't rely on truth or logic to convince people to vote for them they must buy these votes. Preferably with someone else's money. So she takes money from the wealthy, most of whom were going to vote against her anyway, and gives it to the dumb masses, who then eagerly vote to keep her in office so they can get more money from her next time.

194 scaramouche  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:08:52am

Claudia Rossett is very amusing this morning on the disfunctional UN "family". Kinda like The Sopranos, but without the compensations of comic relief and baked ziti at Vesuvio's

195 a soldier's dad  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:10:17am

#191 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C

So it isn't just the rich who benefit.

But, but the people whose earnings are below poverty level did not get a tax cut!!!

/LLL spout, ignoring or blissfully ignorant of the fact that poverty level earners do not pay taxes and receive a full return of withholdings...

196 [Engineer]  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:14:37am

#184 andrew2

If he is in fact a deserter, I sympathise a whole lot less with his plight. Probably the first in USMC history.

Sadly, he is not the first. One Marine stationed in Hawaii went AWOL so he would not have to go to the Mideast in the first Gulf war. Said he didn't join the Marine to go to war. Duh!. He was caught and is probably still making little rocks from big ones.

The Marines will still want this guy back alive so that THEY can deal with him. I will guess that they may not risk people like they would if he was not a deserter.

197 Knight who says Ni  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:15:30am

This is a pro-Bush ad waiting to be made - we are just now beginning to recover from a recession and we have Hillary out there telling us she wants our cash ... smart.

Q: How do you defeat the Democrats?
A: Catch them accidently saying what they really believe and then televise it

Ni

198 billhedrick  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:20:36am

remeber folks, if you pay taxes you are the evil rich

199 WriterMom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:22:41am

Perhaps Hilary and Bill should donate Bill's book advance to the greater good? Lotsa great charities out there. What a great idea.

Feh! That's why I couldn't ever live on a kibbutz ("whadaya mean I got my toilet paper allocation for the month").

OT: Very depressing but important article from NRO about what's happening in Sudan.

Lastly-scathing review in the National Post of MM's "crockumentary". I love it!

200 [Engineer]  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:25:04am

#193 Enkil

So she takes money from the wealthy, most of whom were going to vote against her anyway, and gives it to the dumb masses, who then eagerly vote to keep her in office so they can get more money from her next time.

No, she takes money from the middle and upper middle class. The true rich have many ways not to pay tax if they don't want to. People like me who get most of their income from a salary don't have many ways to protect it from taxes.

201 Shira  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:29:07am

"If I knew for a certainty that a man was coming to my house with the conscious design of doing me good, I should run for my life."

—Henry David Thoreau

202 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:29:24am

Maybe I've beaten this to death... but Hillary (and Kerry, and most democrats) define the "common good" in terms of hiring thousands and thousands of unionized public employees (bureaucrats, teachers, bureaucrats, policemen, bureaucrats, firefighters). In doing so, it raises the amount of money in the coffers of public employee unions... and just who is the beneficiary of campaign contributions from public employee unions?

203 Colt  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:30:58am

#169 V the K

Allawi: I believe very strongly that Saddam had relations with al-Qaida. And these relations started in Sudan.

You remember in 1998, when Clinton bombed the al-Shifa pharmaceuticals facility in Sudan? Richard Clarke said he believed al-Shifa was used to create VX gas. He also said that al-Qaeda was trying to procure VX from this factory, and that the factory was run by the Sudanese government and... Iraqi scientists.

204 WriterMom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:31:24am

OT: Muslim voters prefer Kerry.

This is one for either the "what would we do without the media" file, or the "duh" file.

205 reaganite  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:33:39am

#185 merav
Use this to get past the registration.

206 scaramouche  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:33:43am

#199 WriterMom

Great minds--I just sent that NRO link to Charles!

Have you recovered from your post-election disappointment. I thought David Frum in the Post today did a very good post-mortum--the Tories were done in by a combination of poor message delivery on their part and misleading attack ads by the Liberals. Now we're stuck with a Paul Martin who'll have to pander to Jack Layton--a worst-case scenario if there ever was one.

207 Axiom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:36:41am

By now, most people should know that when someone advocates taking from the fortunate to distribute to the unfortunate they are likely just trying to protect either their own wealth and power or that of their allies and financiers.

It's like Warren Buffet railing against ending the estate tax when he has massive business interests in maintaining the estate tax. If eliminated he is a big fat loser.

By the way. if you think the Nation Magazine loves poetry then you probably think they hate oil. In reality, the Nation Institute is made possible by oil wealth.

208 Axiom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:39:19am

Yea right Muslim voters support Kerry. Wait until Kerry tries to pull a "I'm with the Jews" speech as cover that he is pro-Israel.

The Muslim vote is either staying home in November or voting for Nader.

209 Mary  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:39:34am

RE: Sudan
When is it genocide - never by the UN

Many thousands more are at risk of starving due to a lack of food in the camps where they have fled.
UN Secretary General Kofi Annan has refused to use the term genocide, which would carry a legal obligation to act.

Jeeezus. He never ceases to shame himself.

210 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:39:38am
the Tories were done in by a combination of poor message delivery on their part and misleading attack ads by the Liberals.

Not to nitpick, but "failure to get our message out" and "unfair attacks" were exactly what Democrats blamed their losses in 2002 on. Maybe that's the fallback position for all losing parties to fall back on.

Frankly, it seems to me that Canadian voters are just more socialistic than Americans.

211 lawhawk  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:40:06am

#199 writersmom:

The Sudanese situation is indeed quite scary. It's Rwanda redux. Complete with Annan refusing to get the UN to act because if he calls the situation there genocide, he must act. So he calls it everything else but what it really is.

Into this vacuum, expect folks like Hizbullah who use the civil strife to profit to jump on into the country and exploit it - just like Hizbullah did in Sierra Leone's civil war, which allowed Hizbullah to profit from the sale of conflict diamonds.

That's right folks - terrorist groups love this kind of civil strife since it gives them a stranglehold on the local vices/crimes/material resources, and can flip them into usuable cash, weapons, and recruitment for future terrorist operations.

That's why you can't turn away from situations in Africa like Rwanda, Sudan, Congo, and all the other failed states. That's why nation building is important. That's why the fight against terrorism must include dealing with failed states. That's why the phrase "Never Again" must mean something and not be some empty platitude recited by some UN lackey all the while watching hundreds of thousands displaced, dispatched, and dead.

212 Beagle  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:40:10am

#194 scaramouche

That's St. Claudia of Rosett to me. While the Pope passes out sainthoods, I thought I might try to get a piece of the action.

I never realized how corrupt from top to bottom the UN really is. Believe it or not, after the first Gulf War, I thought it was a good idea to involve the UN, listen to the Arabs, Europeans, and leave Saddam in power.

That led to the failed rebellions, more mass murder, terrorism, starvation through oil-for-food, and massive UN corruption from top to bottom.

Man, what an idealistic, idiotic, piece of intellectual crap I was.

If you are from the UK, could you please explain to me how the definite article works? I'm beginning to think we use it wrong. Grammar is not my favorite subject either. Feel free to ignore.

213 Momzilla  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:41:56am

#202 V the K I know! I know! Call on me! Link

214 JustAHouseWife  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:43:50am

Ah but #191,
you are rich, in Billhillaland! And it's not allowed.
Sharing is caring.

/ugh.

That MSN/Newsweek article link is horrible. The author is having an online chat at Noon eastern time. I would like to say a thing or two myself to that guy.

215 Mary  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:45:39am
216 merav  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:45:43am

#189, scaramouche,

Yeah, I guess I was hoping that someone may work at a place that subscribes to it, and could post that.

#190, andrew2,

Re: planning to help them ambush other Marines? That's a horrible thing to accuse a person of, but in the post 9/11 world, we have to be open to all possibilities. I'd prefer to give him the benefit of the doubt, and continue to pray for his safefy and release. Then the USMC can investigate to its heart's content, and take the appropriate punitive actions.

It's that possibility, however, that alarmed me about the "middle-men's" access to a US military installation. As farfetched as it may sound, with that access, it wouldn't be impossible for them to capture a high-ranking officer, and the resultant shockwaves could be devastating.

G-d forbid.

217 WriterMom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:48:52am

scaramouche/VtheK

I am still really upset about the elections and I think the conservatives lost because too many Canadians want Big Government to take care of them, and are very left wing-so VtheK, I think you are correct.

I have very few Jewish colleagues, but one came by yesterday day to say he voted Liberal because they ought to be the reigning supreme power in government, and he didn't like the conservatives. This is someone who is supposedly concerned about Candada's position vis a vis Israel, and "disgusted" by the anti-war lunatics. And then he goes and votes Liberal!

I said first "how on earth can you say that?", and then that I simply would not be able to have a conversation with him about this topic. I have also publicly declared in front of shocked colleagues that I hate the Liberals. And I do. I really hate this group think mentality and that nobody gives a crap here about how much money they have wasted and their namby pamby attitudes about terrorists and anti-Americanism. It's a frikkin nightmare. I'm so isolated politically!

scaramouche-let's have lunch again to rant about them all!!!

218 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:52:25am

OT

Bad day to float down the Sabinal, Frio, Blanco, Nueces, Guadalupe, Blanco or San Marcos rivers in an innertube

CenTex radar loop

The Blanco River at Wimberley headed off the chart

Did you know there is a Medina River in Texas? Well, its starting to flood quite badly near Bandera, TX

For that matter, its fixing to flood in San Antonio, TX

I've been drunk in San Antonio, and have attended a Spurs game at the not really that old Alamo Dome.

219 Trumpeter  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:53:07am
#21 Egfrow
Communism and Socialism seem to be getter more popular again. Looks like we didn't really win the cold war and it really just shifted gears into the covert.


Socialism lost in the east and won in the west. They are using legislation, propaganda and lies to achieve what they cannot do in a violent revolution.

220 gbl  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:53:13am

I don’t know if I would call Clinton’s remarks honesty or just a stark reality of what many democrats view as a simple redistribution of wealth. I don’t know anyone who does not want to help out individual when in need but just handing out entitlements does not speak much for what this country was built upon – hard work, risk and yes sometimes failure. I’ve always get a kick of the lack of description of who the evil, stealing, uncompassionate are. Politicians wave around figures of figures like $150,000, $200,000, etc. The fact, or lack of common sense, most of these elected officials can grasp is that $150,000 dollars a year for a family varies greatly in “value” from city to city and state to state. Is one rich in the city of Los Angeles or New York making $150,000 a year versus individuals living in the same state but much smaller towns? Anyone who has lived in both environments can easily “feel” the difference. It is much easier however, or rather simplistic, to use divisive labels such as “rich” to further divide the country for political cause instead of instilling the competitive need for a good education and hard work.

221 andrew2  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:55:24am

MERAV #216

You're right, after a couple of days of Marine "Punitive action" he'll be wishing he was back with those slimeballs.

222 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:55:51am

Thanks, writermom, I was expecting the smackdown for my observation.

223 Thom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:56:04am

#218 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C

Q: What's the world's most boring job?

A: Egyptian meteorologist.

The weather's always the frickin' same here! What I wouldn't give to see a cloud!

224 lawhawk  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:58:18am

#220 don't pollute this discussion with the introduction of such warm and fuzzy things as facts. It only pollutes the mind /sarcasm

I happen to live in the NYC metro area, and know that even with the income levels you talk of $150-200k per year, many are still living paycheck to paycheck (consider housing costs, transportation, and all the other monthly bills such as student loans, etc.).

But into that, now NJ is definining a millionaire as someone making 500k or more.

225 Colt  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 4:59:49am
226 WriterMom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:04:06am

VtheK

I definitely think that the conservatives blew it on the abortion "issue" because they couldn't keep people from flapping their mouths and giving the Libs fodder. But for the most part-Canadians are quite left wing, but often without much knowledge of history or economics...just knee-jerk leftism.

OT: Back to the Sudan-did anyone post this yet? It's MEMRI's translation of some Arab commentators on the situation in Sudan.

Very interesting:

"They are not the victims of Israeli or American aggression; therefore, they are not an issue for concern. This is how an approach of indifference towards others outside the circle of conflict with foreigners, and of permitting their murder, is spread as you read and write about the Darfur crisis and consider it an artificial issue, or one unworthy of world protest."
227 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:04:15am

Writermom, a friend of mine just had his racing helmet custom painted. Thought you might like to see it.

228 WriterMom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:05:25am

#223 Thom

Do you eat ful? That must cause a little excitement down in the delta.

229 merav  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:06:31am

#205, reaganite,

Thank you so much!!! :-) (I have the world's slowest computer, which is still processing it.)

#223, thom,

"to see a cloud" I know! I was a-gonna ask Ed Moran for some weather goodies on Israel (where I am), and then I realized, what's the point? The only weather news for most of the year is whether there's gonna be a "sharav" (a heatwave hotter than - well, YOU know, you Egyptian, you).

It's five PM here and I'm waiting for it to cool down a bit so I can go outside to the patio and do my laundry. Without getting sunstroke.

230 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:06:36am
231 WriterMom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:07:03am

VtheK

Is that helmet a tribute to Canada, or is he Canadian? It's lovely, but why did he put Canadian flags on it?

232 Trumpeter  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:08:47am

OT:
Lay back, have some popcorn and watch the new Iraqi prison scandal:


As the arrestees were piled into cars, trucks, vans and buses, they received humiliating slaps, kicks and occasionally significant beatings. In the backs of pickup trucks, Iraqi police officers worked over some of the detainees with lengths of garden hose and metal batons.

It was a public display to remind Baghdad of a time when the security services were respected and feared.

Inside the compound, the arrestees were roughly dragged from the vehicles and forced to run a gauntlet of screaming police officers who slapped, kicked and whipped them until they formed a human puddle in front of the building.


Naah, wrong perpretrators.

233 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:10:34am

#231 --- He's an ex-pat living in the Environs of Detroit. His father took the family out of Canada twenty years ago because he thought they would have better opportunities in the US.

234 Colt  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:12:23am

Uh-oh...

235 WriterMom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:13:06am

Ahhh!?!?!

236 merav  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:13:28am

writer mom,

Hi! Looking forward to the get-together in July. Are you familiar with Cafe Aroma? I was thinking it might be a nice place to meet. There's one close to me with a well-guarded outdoor patio garden, overlooking a waterfall (man-made of course; we ARE in the middle of a desert). Just a thought. :-) I'll e-mail you.

237 Shira  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:16:16am

Charles, come quick! Something weird has happened to the comments!

238 Ol' Southern Boy  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:16:43am

For too long, the Democrats have hidden their socialist agenda behind that neutral party name. It's time to start calling them what they are -- they are definitely not for true democracy. They are Marxist control freaks.

If they can tar the right by calling them "neocons," I recommend we start calling the Democrats "neosocs."

Maybe, if enough people start using that term, it'll turn on the "WTF?" light in the minds of some of the voters.

239 scaramouche  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:17:07am

#217 WriterMom

Kidlet is off to day camp so my days are mosty free. Email me time and place.

240 aboo-Hoo-Hoo  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:19:23am

OT - Our Left, you know the ones, the ones who are anti-war, support the freedom fighters, martyr's, okkkupation resistance, the militants the f'ing terrorists, etc, etc, etc, ad neausa... have blown gaskets galore and are in complete meltdown over the newly sovereign interim government in Iraq.

These are the same wing-nuts that demanded U.N. participation, multinational co-operation and/ force, ta-da, ta-da, ta-da...have now decided that the Iraq Interim Government is the new dictatorship and should not be exercising their sovereign rights to govern or control the security, blah, blah, blah...

This from the TNR:

SEX, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHASTITY: Newly "sovereign" Iraqi Interim PM Iyad Allawi looks posed to declare some form of martial law. President Bush has given him the green light. "Prime Minister Allawi, as head of a sovereign government, may decide he has to take tough measures to deal with a cold-blooded killer," Bush said yesterday in Istanbul. "Our job is to help." The imposition of martial law backed by force of U.S. arms is a very serious gamble, one that could risk inflaming sectarian divides--are "tough measures" going to extend to northern cities, where Kurdish forces are evicting Arabs? If not, how will Arab cities under martial law, particularly in the Sunni Triangle, react?--and risks making Allawi appear a puppet of foreign agents. And once governments in places that have never known democracy start imposing martial law, they can find it extremely difficult to put their foot on the brake...

They've already conveniently forgotten it was their beloved U.N. which set-up, supervised, monitored and approved the new government. Gawd almighty.

Surely their is a lower standard, some description, other than 'morally and ethically bankrupt' to describe these...these ignorant hypocrites.

241 Renna  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:19:55am

Is it just me or did someone blow up da thread?

242 Darleen  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:20:01am

I'm a bit late to this thread, but I want to point out James Lileks' Monday Bleat, scroll down to the last item where he has a Kerry girl at his house and see her closing statement before she stomps off in a huff.

The next day I heard Hillary's bald statement.

For the Left, it's never your money, it's the State's (and only if the State is run by the correct people), because...well, you're too stupid, venal and cannot be trusted to spend it the correct way.

243 merav  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:20:23am

Everything looks fine to me, except that #232 Trumpeter's comments are a huge blank space. Trumpeter, can you repost your message? Before it disappeared, as I was scrollling up, I thought I saw a reference to the poetry contest in The Nation that I was asking about earlier on the thread.

Shira, are you coming to the LGF-get-together?

244 Boston Patriot  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:21:57am

Ayn Rand clearly identified the fact that there is no such thing as the "common good", just as there is no such entity as "society". Society is merely a collection of individuals, and those who use coercive force in the name of the "common good" are, NECESSARILY, sacrificing some individuals for the sake of others. This is the ANTITHESIS of the principle of individual rights, upon which America was founded- i.e. that the individual has a right to live for his OWN sake, neither sacrificing himself to others NOR others to himself.

The "common good" has been evoked by every totalitarian state in the history of mankind. It is their mantra. That a (likely) future president is spewing this garbage is frightening. Ideologically, Hillary has not surpassed the level of the primitive savage who tosses virgins into a volcano. That the sacrificed proposed by Hillary is the producer, instead of the virgin, and the recipient is the needy, instead of the volcano god, is irrelevant. They are identical in principle. After the individual is burned, it is irrelevant to him to whom his flesh was fed against his will.

This IS pure Marxism, and Marxism is just as mystical as religion despite Marx's claims of atheism. He simply replaced the concept of a supernatural God with a mystical notion of "society"- a collective consciousness floating around in the ether while the individual is regarded as just a mass of flesh and glandular squirtings. Sacrificing the individual to either notion is morally repugnant.

245 andrew2  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:23:12am

#215 MARY

that NRO article really stirrs up some old hostility I feel towards the Great Stain Maker, Bill Clinton.

If J(F)Kerry and his wife's millions control the White House, we will probably wish Clinton was back there screwing things up.

Seriously, Kerry represents something new in American politics, yes, even lower than Clinton. Kerry represents the LLL, backed by Mommy Warbucks, the Queen of liberalism.

The 57 faces of Mrs. Heinz.. and her zombies are now mainstream.

Kerry would be guaranteed to win if he had O'l Fat Bastard Mike-Al- Moore as VP.

/
venting off

246 godfrey  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:23:20am

Abolish income tax in favor of sales tax? How is that more equitable? Wouldn't poor people get hit harder by this? And wouldn't it dampen consumer spending?

I really like the idea of a flat tax with exemptions for under $28k-ers (a threshold that can be indexed to rising incomes). I only worry that legislators will use the mammoth rise in tax revenue as a means of extending federal/state power.

Russia has had good results with a flat tax, presumably. Can anyone point to more data about this?

The only thing I *really* dislike is Hillary's purportedly "liberal" and "progressive" income tax -- and the whole current tax regime.

We just need someone with more brio and youthful vitality to advance the idea. Steve Forbes wasn't the best quarterback for it.

247 Dime IV  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:24:28am

From Joseph Green's "The Anarchy Of Production Beneath The Veneer Of Soviet Revisionist Planning" (Communist Voice, vol. 3, #1, March 1, 1997):

The Soviet ministries planned production in the interests of the ruling class, which was a new bourgeoisie. Marxism has never held that nationalization necessarily means planning on behalf of all society--it means planning on behalf of the class that controls the state.

Hillary: Politburo all the way. One day, I hope to read of her slow, horrifying, agonizing demise in a chemical toilet accident.

Joel T.

248 RIP Ford  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:26:25am

I see that Micheal Moore sat on the comments, again.

Where are his handlers?

249 Axiom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:27:47am

#246 godfrey

Not just Russia; Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania and the Ukraine are all floating flat tax policies.

Here's a Hoover Digest link about the flat tax.

250 Axiom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:28:44am

Oh yeah, if you want A LOT more information on policy issues then I recommend

251 WriterMom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:29:03am

Merav-I love Cafe Aroma...mmm, their hot chocolate with the square of milk chocolate on the bottom and the whipped cream?!?! Yummy.

Sound good. Also thinking a kid/playing event maybe at Gan Sacher or the Mifletzet park?

252 Beagle  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:29:47am

[Alexander Haig stereotype]

OK, it's a hacking people. Don't worry, it's just the best website. I'm in charge.

Does anyone know how to turn this thing on?

What's a .sys file?

/AHS

Um, that's like modern art, dude.

253 Ed Moran: Abu GOMEX aoa 28C  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:31:16am

34C in Tel Aviv.


Thats about a normal late June/early July day in HOU, but it hasn't been normal.


We'll probably pass 2001 for the all time rainiest June in HOU today. The record was 19.2" (48.8cm), most of which fell during Tropical Storm Allison. All this w/o benefit of a tropical cyclone. Of course, IAH got less rain than most during Allison, with some locations in Harris County getting 40 inches (over 1 m) of rain.


But, the sub-tropical jet stream should be shifting back to where it belongs, as finally, it looks like the daily value of the Southern Oscillation Index, a measure of relative pressures between Darwin and Tahiti has gone neutral. By one definition, a 90 day SOI greater in magnitude than -5 is considered an El Ni&ntildeo. That would mean a dull hurricane season for the US, but that seems to be diminishing as a threat.

The Indian Monsoon is slowly getting active again, another sign a strong El Ni&ntildeo is not imminent.

July is usually a very quite month for Atlantic tropical cyclones in the Atlantic (not the Northwest Pacific, though, as Cat 3 Typhoon Mindulle will batter Taiwan.

Of course, last July Hurricane Claudette hit just south of the HOU area in Matagorda Bay, but that is unusual, which is good, as most of Texas needs a couple of weeks of near 40C heat and sunshine to dry out. The recent rains, clouds, and associated river run-off has actually cooled the immediate coastal waters of Texas below 28C. 26.5C is minimum for tropical cyclogenesis, 28 to 28.5C is the minimum for a major cyclone.

All quiet in the Eastern Atlantic, as well as the Western Atlantic, however, things may be heating up a bit in the eastern North Pacific.

254 Shira  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:31:28am

#243 Merav

I'd love to! When and where will it be? (I'd like to cast my vote for a kosher, non-smoking venue.)

255 Free Speech Is Only For über-Libs  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:33:39am

The left are getting way to scary for reality.

Speaking of the Clinton - The brilliant Evan Coyne Maloney over at Brain Terminal has a video of fine young Clinton fans with nice pants.
"The Clinton Legacy".

[Link: www.brainterminal.com...]

256 merav  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:34:54am

Guys, in my younger days I used to support Bill Clinton. OK? I confess.

I even considered Hillary a possible first female US president.

Then she hugged Sura Arafat, after Madame Terrorist announced that Israel was poisoning Palestinian water with chemical weapons. Did she question such a ridiculous statement? No. Was a handshake sufficient? No.

Then I sent in my absentee ballot for NY senate. It was the first time I'd ever voted Repulican, and the last time I can ever imagine voting Democrat. Her opponent, Rick Lazio, lost, but at least I had my vote.

257 Renna  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:35:56am

#244 Boston patriot

Spot on. THere are those who will not understand why it disconcerts/scares/upsets me so much to read words like "the common good."

"How could we be against good? What is wrong with good for everyone in general, isn't that the job of government, like making parks?"

They don't understand that it is, as you said, the antithesis of the principle of individual rights, or to put it another way, the polar opposite of freedom.

I am not a farm animal! I don't need anyone to take care of me. Leave me the heck alone and I'll see to me and my family.

258 Axiom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:36:53am

Speaking of the Baltic states. Lithuania just elected a former 50 year exile who fled the Red Army as President. He lived in Chicago for almost 50 years before returning to Lithuania in '97.

Shall we expect the uber:libs/progresslaves to protest that former exiles are winning executive offices in former Soviet Client states?

259 a soldier's dad  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:38:07am

Re: LGF meet-ups

Is there any talk of a meet-up of Florida lizardoids??? I'm in the Tampa area.

260 Pete(Detroit)  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:39:01am

17 Zombie -
Actually, the case is even stronger for repealing taxes on business - the 'extra' mony winds up in someone's pocket where it's taxed, invested, or spent. Or the prices come down, improving compettitve nature, sales go up, hire more people, make more money (see a|) all good for the econ.
Likely be a combo of both.
Further advantage of a sales tax is that it (by nature) encourages saving and investment.
Besides, who says any 'new' tax system needs to be remotely revenue nutral? Gov'ts too large by at least half already...

261 aboo-Hoo-Hoo  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:40:26am

242 Darlene

That's classic and hilarious, thanks.

262 a soldier's dad  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:41:07am

#256 merav

As a lifetime Republican (if there were ever a worthy, non-socialistic Democrat, I would consider him/her), welcome to the light. ;-)

263 Free Speech Is Only For über-Libs  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:41:44am

Speaking of Lithuania - a friend of mine went there and saw these: (hill of Crosses) She said it was incredible.

[Link: www.sacredsites.com...]

264 David Simon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:41:58am
The true rich have many ways to pay tax if they don't want to.

And they usually end up living like Leona Helmsley.

The Tax Reform Act of 1986 slammed the door on abusive tax shelters. A couple dozen new shelters were created in the nineties, but they had no economic substance. People who were foolish enough to invest in them are wishing they hadn't; the IRS is going after them and hitting them with back taxes and stiff penalties (plus they're out the shelter fee that they paid the promoter).

It's a myth that rich people pay no tax. In fact, rich people pay disproportionately more on average.

265 Axiom  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:43:44am

#260 Pete(Detroit)

I think the time is ripe to tear down the greatest wall limiting freedom - The New Deal. Which is really an old deal, dreamed up by early marxists to concentrate capital in the hands of government.

If there ever was a group of people that should oppose the New Deal it is those groups that die at the earliest age; specifically, Blacks, American Indians and Hispanics. You'll pay into SS your whole life, but if you die before you qualify to collect your contributions are swallowed into the system.

266 Renna  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:44:48am

#263 - Has the ACLU seen that!!!

267 a soldier's dad  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:47:24am

#263 Free Speech Is Only For über-Libs

Thanks for that link, I had never heard of this place in Lituania. Very interesting and inspiring.

268 RIP Ford  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:48:41am

#259 a soldier's dad

I know SwampWoman is in Florida, but that's all I can recall right now.

269 merav  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:51:09am

Renna, #257,

Good point. "How could we be against good?" That argument is often applied against Israel for defying UN demands to hack her security, while ignoring Sudanese starvation and slavery.

How often have we heard the phrase, "the good offices" of the UN, or of the Secretary General, etc.

When I used to be a liberal, I used to believe that there really was a universal common good. I thought that those who didn't agree were simply less educated, less enlightened or less evolved. And THAT was to avoid labeling them as heartless.

That's the attitude I still see when debating with LLL's. This attitude of, if you'd only taken the courses I have, if you'd only read my paper on that topic, if you had half the common-sense that I have, you'd be a liberal too. It really never occurred to me, that, yes, there are educated people who disagree. Not out of ignorance, but because they've (we've) considered all of the arguments, and consider the conservative one to be most sensible.

Common good, IMHO, is almost impossible to administer. How can there be a COMMON good, when what's "good" for one people, is the annihilation of another?

270 Renna  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:51:16am

From #263 link

The Soviets repeatedly removed Christian crosses placed on the hill by Lithuanians. Three times, during 1961, 1973 and 1975, the hill was leveled, the crosses were burned or turned into scrap metal, and the area was covered with waste and sewage. Following each of these desecrations local inhabitants and pilgrims from all over Lithuania rapidly replaced crosses upon the sacred hill.
271 Free Speech Is Only For über-Libs  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:52:13am

#266 Renna

Really.


Captured by Germany in World War II, the city suffered heavy damage when Soviet Russia retook it at the war's end. From 1944 until Lithuania's independence in 1991, Siauliai was a part of the Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic of the USSR. During the Soviet era, the pilgrimage to the Hill of Crosses served as a vital expression of Lithuanian nationalism. The Soviets repeatedly removed Christian crosses placed on the hill by Lithuanians. Three times, during 1961, 1973 and 1975, the hill was leveled, the crosses were burned or turned into scrap metal, and the area was covered with waste and sewage. Following each of these desecrations local inhabitants and pilgrims from all over Lithuania rapidly replaced crosses upon the sacred hill. In 1985, the Hill of Crosses was finally left in peace. The reputation of the sacred hill has since spread all over the world and every year it is visited by many thousands of pilgrims. Pope John Paul II visited the Hill of Crosses in September of 1993.

The Soviets repeatedly removed Christian crosses placed on the hill by Lithuanians.

It seems the former Soviets and the ACLU have something in common. To both - religion is poison and any expression of it should be banned. - especially Christianity.

ACLU = Commie.

272 Free Speech Is Only For über-Libs  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:52:51am

Renna -

LOL! I owe you a drink.

273 Smit  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:53:43am

OT - The french take a stand

French Foreign Minister Michel Barnier has urged Israel to end the isolation of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat in the West Bank town of Ramallah.

After meeting Mr Arafat in Ramallah, Mr Barnier said the living conditions were "not dignifying" for the elected Palestinian leader.

"We think that this situation should come to an end because he [Arafat] is the legitimate and elected president of the Palestinian people," Mr Barnier added.

He also said that he "transmitted... a message of friendship and solidarity" during his talks with the Palestinian Prime Minister Ahmed Qurei.

France condemns Arafat isolation

274 a soldier's dad  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:53:53am

#268 RIP Ford

Thanks for the info. For some reason, I thought SwampWoman would have been in Louisiana. I'll ask her about it next time I run into her on one of the threads.

275 Renna  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:55:01am

And yet they kept putting them back. Not exactly our reaction, sad to say.

276 Trumpeter  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:59:57am

The link in #232 should be:


[Link: www.newkerala.com...]

277 Free Speech Is Only For über-Libs  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:01:26am

Renna.

yeah- Christianity/spirituality is losing out in this country. Sadly it is being replaced with "worship the state/ worship feeling good/ Clinton style".

Sad times.

278 Smit  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:02:17am

Tough choice, support the Stalinists or the Islamists.

Police in Azerbaijan have raided a mosque in the capital, surrounding the building and expelling worshippers.

'Dissident' Azeri mosque raided

But this human rights imam is, according to the government,

Mr Ibrahimoglu is an Islamic fundamentalist with links to radical Shia groups across the border in Iran.

Azeri mosque haunted by Soviet past

279 Solomon X  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:03:31am

The tax man cometh!! Hillary and her comrades want to make sure you support the common good whether you like it or not. Resistance is futile!

When you earn it by the sweat of your brow, there is an Income Tax.

Try to avoid income taxes, then there is the Alternative Minimun Tax.

Married? Sorry, there is a tax penalty for that.

If you spend it, there's a Sales Tax.

If you invest it, there's a Capital Gains tax and more income taxes.

If you give it away, there's a Gift Tax.

If there is any left over when you die, there's an Estate Tax.

Maybe give it to the grandkids? Well, then there is the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax.

Never mind real estate taxes, transfer taxes, excise taxes, corporate level taxes, various state taxes, various local taxes, hotel/entertainment taxes, sin taxes, gasoline taxes, personal property taxes, or intangible taxes.

It is your patriotic duty, comrades!

280 David Simon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:04:36am
Abolish income tax in favor of sales tax? How is that more equitable?

If necessities are exempt, the tax becomes voluntary. What could be fairer than that?

And wouldn't it dampen consumer spending?

Yes, but it would encourage saving and investment.

Wouldn't poor people get hit harder by this?

Yes, it's a regressive tax; that's why it'll never happen.

281 merav  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:08:12am

#263, Renna,

No, the ACLU is only responsible for rooting out godliness in America. :-(

#262, soldier's dad,

Thanks. :-)

#253, ed moran,

Thanks for the Israeli/Egyptian reports. I have a question, though. I've lived in Texas, and New York, and Israel. And the 34C in Israel just feels so much HOTTER than it does in the other places. Maybe it's the burning sun (of course it is), but the only other place I've ever felt temperatures as hot as here, was in Arizona. (Where morning radio greets you: Good morning, Tucson. It's a balmy 110 degrees...)

Question: Is it just me, or is it scientifically recognized, that, say, 85F under a blazing Middle Eastern sun feels a LOT hotter than 85F in NY?

#254 shira,

Great! We haven't set the date. E-mail me, OK?

#251 writer mom,

Sounds like fun. I don't really have a preference re: parks - my kids love the Monster Park, though. I seem to remember available nearby shade. Haven't been there in years, though. (Kinda became a hermit during the intifada.)

Time to get back to work. BYE, EVERYONE. :-)

282 a soldier's dad  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:08:14am

#277 Free Speech Is Only For über-Libs

Amen to that. As usual, the hope lies in the young people, many of whom are beginning to see Chrisitanity as a better alternative to the materialistic pursuit for pleasure. I hate to quote CSNY, but teach your children well.

BTW, there have been discussions on some threads recently regarding Christianity and Anti-semitism.

For the record, I am a Christian. My dog is trained to sniff out anti-semites and jihadis, and this is how she welcomes them.

283 David Simon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:10:16am

#279 Solomon X - Great post. One small clarification:

If you give it away, there's a Gift Tax.

Unless you give it to a qualified charity (and charitable contributions are also deductible for alternative minimum tax purposes).

284 Boston Patriot  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:11:43am

#257 Renna

The only reason these claims are seen as "the good", or at least "noble in intent", is because sacrifice is considered a virtue. Only when altruism is exposed as the grossly immoral code that it is, and self-interest is seen as a virtue, will things change. Until those ideas, and what they are fundamentally based on (reason), can penetrate the universities to some significant degree, things will deteriorate. The average citizen will continue to be convinced, sometimes grudgingly, that government programs which violate individual rights in the name of the masses are some pragmatic, "real world" necessity.

#128 Kalev above is a perfect example of this attitude.

285 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:12:18am

Well, I'm going to commit heresy here... but given that the lower-income types make disproportionate use of public services (compared with the well-off), shouldn't they pay a higher share of the burden for maintaining those services?

286 Solomon X  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:14:26am

OT

The AP unintentionally goes lizard-like and reports on [bigoted word] internet chats debating whether it is OK to decapitate other [bigoted word]s. Apparently, it is universally accepted among the [bigoted word]s that the kufirs are ripe for the knife.

Islamic Sites Debate Beheading of Muslims

Al-Zarqawi's movement claimed responsibility for the beheading of Kim Sun-il, a South Korean who worked for a company delivering supplies to American forces, and Nicholas Berg, an American businessman. Al-Qaida-linked militants in Saudi Arabia decapitated American engineer Paul M. Johnson Jr. and posted pictures of his severed head on the Internet.
Most people who post messages on several Islamic Web sites known for their extremist bent believe those are justified. But the issue of whether it is proper kill Muslims taken captive because of their links to the U.S. military has been a hot topic.
Opinions are mixed. Some people appealed on the kidnappers to spare the Turks because they were "fellow Muslims." Others urged militants to decapitate them.
"Turkish Muslims should be the first to demand that those hypocrites be beheaded, as they are allied with the devil," meaning the Americans, one person wrote on a Web site that has published al-Zarqawi statements and claims of responsibility for other killings. "They should serve as an example to every apostate."

Such a rich, peaceful culture.

287 dazoid81  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:15:19am

am I the only person confused by the French saying that George Bush needs to keep his nose out of French politics? Are these the same foreign leaders who told John Kerry he needs to take out G.W.B., or were those guys just made up? The same French leaders who've taken just about every opportunity over the past year or two to tell us that just about everything we do is wrong? The guys that tell us we shouldn't do anything w/o UN involvement, then block the UN from getting involved?
echem...
/end pretend shock

288 Boston Patriot  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:15:57am

#277 SFIFUL

That's a false alternative. What about the worship of man? The belief that the individual- neither God NOR the State- is supreme.

289 Renna  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:16:19am

merav-

I thought that those who didn't agree were simply less educated, less enlightened or less evolved. And THAT was to avoid labeling them as heartless.

You have found the key!

In his Vision of the Anointed, Thomas Sowell puts it more clearly than I've ever seen. Their viewpoint is simply that if you disagree you must either be stupid or evil.

"Problems exist because others are not as wise or as virtuous as the anointed."

I can go through about any issue you can think of and illustrate that point.

290 a soldier's dad  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:17:56am

#279 Solomon X

I knew we were taxed to death, but that is an eye opening post. I guess "No taxation without representation" should have been "No taxation, period." The government has to have funds to function, but it has grown way out of proportion.

I recall once when my son was younger he asked me what the difference was between Republicans and Democrats. Not wanting to get into all the complicated political stances of each party at the time, I boiled it down to a simple "The Republicans want you to keep most of the money you earn, they just need the minimum to help our country, and the Democrats want to take as much of the money you earn as they can." He was pointing out to me a few weeks ago, after listening to John Kerry talk about socilized medicine, more money for education, etc., how that simple description still held true.

291 addison  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:18:39am

#289 Renna,

That is a wonderful book. I finished it about two months ago and it was one of the best I have ever read.

292 Free Speech Is Only For über-Libs  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:19:11am

#282 a soldier's dad

I clicked on your link and it didn't work :-(

I'd say most Christians are not anti-Semitic - but are in fact very supportive and of what the Jews face.

Considering that Jews and Christians are under attack from all sides (the left -the ACLU - the Islamofascists) I don't see how or why Christians and Jews shouldn't link arms.

Christians and Jews are hated around the world. That's all I know. I'm not that interested in blaming worldly religions on anything unless it's relevant. When uber-;libs bring up the crusades - it's like - yeah, so? right now Islam wants your head and would prefer you give up freedom for a burka.

293 Just Plain Frank- Formerly Frank  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:21:27am

What an impirious bitch. Is that a word?

294 David Simon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:23:05am

#285 V the K - One has to look no further than the farce that is our welfare system to see the damage that well-meaning social programs can cause. Liberals can't quite seem to grasp this paradox.

295 Smit  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:23:22am

Completely OT - But grateful for someone's help.

I had a bit of a brain freeze earlier this week, talking about how inflation works.

If you had $2000 on Jan 1st, and there was a 2000% inflation rate (heaven forbid) then by Dec 31st your $2000 would have the purchasing power of one $1 (Jan 1st).

To have the same purchasing power on Dec 31st you would now need $4,000,000.

Is that correct?

296 Free Speech Is Only For über-Libs  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:23:49am

Hillary as VP???!!???

eeek!


[Link: www.drudgereport.com...]

297 Solomon X  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:26:16am

Re David Simon #283

501(c)(3) is a beautiful thing. Team it up with a split interest charitable trust, transfer your highly appreciated unproductive property to it, and direct the ensuing income stream to a life insurance policy owned in an irrevocable trust. Bam! No capital gain taxes on sale of property and tax-free diversification, get a current income tax charitable deduction, remove asset from estate taxation and replace it with one that passes estate tax and income tax free to your heirs!! Oh, and help out some sick kids.

298 Renna  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:32:35am
299 a soldier's dad  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:32:36am

#292 Free Speech Is Only For über-Libs

Sorry. I signed up for the free Webshots because I thought I could share photos with the public through it, but for some reason, if you are not signed into Webshots, it doesn't let you see them. Oh, well. Too bad, because she really looks cool in the photo. I'll have to keep searching for a way to share photos on the net.

Any suggestions, anyone?

300 Cato the Elder  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:32:42am

In plain English: "We're going to take things away from you and give them to our friends."

Le communisme pur.

301 Free Speech Is Only For über-Libs  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:33:19am

#288

I'm not sure what you mean. I'm an individualist. But I don't worship myself or "man".

As an individualist person, I am a spiritual but not really connected to religion per say. I respect all religions as long as they dont' hurt me as an individual. I am not offended by traditional religions that make up the foundation of this nation.

I desire freedom of religion and respect a pluralist society, like we have that also respects the individuals right to freedom of religion. I am somewhat fearful of politicians who want to remove every ounce of spirituality from public life.

I see modern day democrats are sliding more and more towards the soviet style paradigm where all forms of religious expression (except Islam of course) are expelled.
Blabbering on – steps off soap box..

302 struan al kufr  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:36:37am

#244 Boston Patriot

re Ayn Rand and the "common good."

"America's abundance was created not by public sacrifices to "the common good," but by the productive genius of free men who pursued their own personal interests and the making of their own private fortunes. They did not starve the people to pay for America's industrialization. They gave the people better jobs, higher wages and cheaper goods with every new machine they invented, with every scientific discovery or technological advance -- and thus the whole country was moving forward and profiting, not suffering, every step of the way."

Who is John Gault again?

303 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:37:56am

#296 --- On the plus side, Hillary on the ticket would motivate Bush's base... there being little else in this administration to enthuse the base for another four years of Bush's 'Dem's Domestic Doormat' agenda.

304 M G  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:42:27am

I've just read this news item. And since I'm not in the mood to read nearly 300 posts, I'll risk sounding redundant:

It is true that every act of tyranny has been justified by "the common good" or "the public interest" but what made it possible?

You'll find the answer in the cynics view of human nature. That view is not exclusive to the cynical. It is everywhere. It is shared by so many, especially by those who prattle about "love" until your ears bleed. That view is: people are sinful and/or weak and/or stupid, and thus would destroy themeselves and/or each other at the first opportunity.

Rhetorical question of the day: Is it a big jump from that bleak, negative view of human nature to saying we need a paternalistic nanny government making all the important life decisions for us?

Btw, the next time somebody openly advocates that, ask them when did the government cease to be evil/idiot humans and thus fit to rule us evil/idiot humans. While you're at it, ask these cynics when they stopped being an evil/idiot human, and if not, then why the hell should anyone listen to their admittedly unqualified opinion. And ask them where, when, and the how the heck things like computers or the declaration of independence could've been invented by evil/idiot humans. Then ask them if they ever heard of "projection," and challenge them to figure-out, if they can, what you meant by that last question.

By then, the popcorn should be ready, and can you sit back, and enjoy the absurd evasions, equivocations, and miscellaneous stammering with which they always respond to such basic questions.

305 Buckeye Abroad  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:42:57am

#295 Smit

Inflation of 2000% would mean you would need $40,000 to purchase anything the costed $2000 a year ago. The current value of you original $2000 would have only the purchasing power of $100 in present terms.

If you are really inserested, email me and I could give you about a dozen formulas to deterimine past, present future time value of money (one of many old Accountancy books from the college days).

306 Boston Patriot  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:43:32am

#295

Adjusting for inflation:

x=principle
i= inflation rate (in DECIMAL form, i.e. 2000%=20)
y=# of years

x * (1+i)^y

Thus, in one year, at 2000% inflation, you would need $42,000 at the end of the year to have the same purchasing power as $2,000 at the beginning of the year. ($2,000 * (1+20)^1)

Or, conversely, after one year due to 2,000% inflation, your $2,000 would have the purchasing power of $95.24. (2,000 * (2,000/42,0000))

307 Free Speech Is Only For über-Libs  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:44:47am

#303 V the K

I don't know. I think If Hillary is the VP choice it will do what you say, and get the base off it's ass. but it will inspire Clinton head to do the same. I think Bush should ditch Cheney and get McCain or Giuliani (sp?) really quick. I like Cheney - but like it or not the Bush admin has to face the fact that Cheney is a lightening rod for bad publicity. (even though that negative publicity is mostly false and trumped up by the left-wing media)


Liberals love the Clintons. Conservative hate her - it's hard to say if it will help or hurt but I don't want to find out. She must be defeated. Especially in light of her recent socialist comments.

308 Gordon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:47:44am

The main problem with George W. Bush is not that he and the Republicans have cut taxes, although some of the tax cuts, such as the complete abolition of inheritance taxes, I don't agree with. The problem is that he and the Republicans have not cut spending to match the tax cuts. The result is ballooning federal deficits. He's undoing all the good work Clinton did to stop the payment of hundreds of billions of our tax dollars per year as interest payments on the federal debt.

The reason he and the Republicans haven't cut spending? The defense budget has something to do with it, but the other dirty little secret is that all of us Americans yammering about high taxes also want government services such as nice interstate highways, money for our children's public schools, etc.

Hillary's just following the path her husband led to provide fiscal sanity to this country.

309 Baldy  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:48:42am

OT: Lawmakers Ask Ashcroft Why Suspect Freed (Yahoo! News/AP)

WASHINGTON - Republican and Democratic lawmakers alike are demanding to know why the Bush administration chose to release to Syria a terror suspect when several prosecutors and FBI agents had collected evidence for a possible criminal case...Justice officials told AP that despite concerns about al-Marabh's possible ties to terrorism, deportation was "determined to be the best option available under the law to protect our national security," including intelligence sources and methods.
310 David Simon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:49:36am

#297 Solomon X - I like it. If you have any clients with closely-held businesses, check out Section 1042 (especially if a disproportionate amount of their wealth is tied up in the company stock). If you sell at least 30% of the company to an ESOP and invest the proceeds in qualified replacement property (e.g. publicly-traded stock), you can defer income tax as long as you hold the replacement property. Die holding it, and you avoid paying income tax on the sale of your company stock altogether.

311 Smit  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:55:50am

Thanks Buckeye and Boston Patriot. Much appreciated.

Buckeye, I would be interested in more info - I've put my email up in this post.

No rush at all - I'm leaving work now.

Thanks Again.

312 RIP Ford  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:56:12am

#299 a soldier's dad

The best photo hosting site that I have found is Cybertarp.

It's great. Free, easy to use and no log on needed to view. Just copy and paste your url for the photo into an e-mail or LGF post. Hope this helps.

313 David Simon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:56:41am

#308 Gordon -

the complete abolition of inheritance taxes

Wrong. That provision lasts one year; then it sunsets.

The problem is that (Bush) and the Republicans have not cut spending

You'll get no argument from me there.

314 Inspector Callahan  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 6:58:40am

such as the complete abolition of inheritance taxes, I don't agree with.

Since this is an economics post, let's talk economics. How is it right (or fair), that someone who pays taxes on his earnings all his life, when they die, they should pay taxes on that again? I do not understand how anyone should be for this.

The problem is that he and the Republicans have not cut spending to match the tax cuts.

I agree with this, and most conservatives do as well.

He's undoing all the good work Clinton did to stop the payment of hundreds of billions of our tax dollars per year as interest payments on the federal debt.

Gordon, let's give credit where it is due. Clinton spent like a drunken lottery winner the first two years of his term. Republicans came in in 1994 and basically shut down this spending machine.

There is an argument to be made that (if we weren't in a war) Kerry would be the better choice only because Republicans in Congress are more spendthrift when a democrat is in office. When the same party controls the legislative and executive, they have a tendency to spend too much.

all of us Americans yammering about high taxes also want government services such as nice interstate highways, money for our children's public schools, etc.

This is most definitely true. Cut other people's programs, but, by golly, not mine. To change peoples minds about this is to change the prevailing environment in this country. To do this, you have to circumvent the education establishment and the media. It seems like an impossible task.

Hillary's just following the path her husband led to provide fiscal sanity to this country.

Like I said before, give credit where it is due. I'm not saying all of it should go to the packs in Congress, but not all of it should go to Clinton either.

Gordon, I've noticed a sea change in your thinking since I started reading this blog 3 years ago. Welcome to the entrance to the other side - you're almost home.

TV (Harry)

315 Boston Patriot  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 7:04:01am

#308 Gordon

Using the coercive power of the government to expropriate the wealth of those who have earned it is not "fiscal sanity". It's called theft.

This isn't Georgetown Gordon, is it? If it is, you know who this is!

316 struan al kufr  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 7:05:03am

Back during the Clinton Admin a new Marine Corporal was assigned to the White House Detail and given the job of standing at the bottom of the steps of the President's Marine One helicopter on the White House lawn.

First day on the job and he is understandbly nervous, keeping a sharp eye on the door Clinton must exit from.

Finally he's sees the President come out and start towards the chopper, followed by a little puppy.

As Clinton nears, the Cpl snaps to attention, fires off a salute and says: "Good Morning, Mr. President! New dog, sir?"

"Yes," says Clinton.

"Hunting dog, sir?" returns the Cpl, trying to be conversational with the President of the United States.

"No, no, no - couldn't be a hunting dog, that would be politically incorrect. No, as a matter of fact, we got him for Hillary."

The Marine, holding his salute rigidly, grins from ear-to-ear, his joy unbounded by training or discipline and bellows -

"GOOD TRADE SIR!"

317 merav  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 7:07:17am

struan, #316, Great one! :-)

318 David Simon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 7:16:21am

#314 Inspector Callahan - Great post.

319 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 7:21:39am

Schools, defense, and highways... I don't think there's a problem with paying for those. And they could easily be accommodated at a lower rate of taxation than at present.

Paying for prescription drugs for people who can already afford it, lavish farm subsidies for Archer Daniels Midland and other well-connected lobbyists, federal subsidies for mass transit systems nobody wants, sensitivity training seminars for federal bureaucrats, bonus payments for failing schools, medicare fraud, subsidies to anti-American artists and lawyers, subsidies to tobacco companies, misguided drug war efforts, air traffic control (privatize it!), foreign aid to ungrateful countries that vote against us at the UN, bailouts for people who live in flood plains but won't buy insurance ... these are things Hillary defines as "the common good." Eliminate these and other wasteful government programs and there would be no deficit.

320 alan111  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 7:32:51am

Drudge is reporting that Hillary will be Kerry's running mate and that it will capture the headlines for two months. I agree with her policy on raising taxes and am pleasantly surprised that Charles has brought this to the attention of LGF.

At present the US is running record budget defecits and is in the unenviable position of the Chinese financing the War on Terror and also the War in Iraq.


#315 Boston Patriot

Who exactly do you think is going to pay for increased military spending and tax cuts? Where is the money going to come from and who is going to pay it back?

321 Gordon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 7:50:27am

#314 Inspector Callahan: The inheritance tax is not a tax on the person who has accumulated (or inherited) the wealth. That person is dead, and cannot spend or be taxed any more.

The persons being taxed are those who are inheriting the unearned wealth. I have no ethical or moral problem with this. Unlike aristocracies, we are not a society where unearned wealth should be hoarded generation upon generation.

I think the inheritance tax bar is properly being raised, because the old $600,000 limit was not indexed for inflation. But I don't believe it should be eliminated. You are correct that it is due to "sunset," but I can't imagine even the Democrats going back to the $600,000 limit. They would probably keep it at $10 million or whatever it will be the year before it actually disappears.

322 Colt  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 7:53:30am
The persons being taxed are those who are inheriting the unearned wealth.

Huh? Just because the person is dead doesn't mean the wealth was unearned.

323 a soldier's dad  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 7:53:45am
324 Gordon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 7:55:41am

#319 V the K: Most of the things on your list are indeed boondoggles. The main one I would disagree with is mass transit, since now every dollar we spend on private automobile fuel consumption has about 25 cents of it going to the House of Saud.

The sad thing is that almost all of the items you list are also supported by George Bush and the Republicans as part of the "common good." A truly compassionate conservative would stop these boondoggles instead of spending his time trying to kill off stem cell research, abolish state laws regarding euthanasia he doesn't like, propose a ridiculous constitutional amendment regarding gay marriage, etc.

325 a soldier's dad  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 7:57:41am

#282 a soldier's dad
#292 Free Speech Is Only For über-Libs

Maybe it will work this time...

...this is how she welcomes them.

(fully realizing that this thread is old and all...)

326 Gordon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 7:58:13am

#322 Colt: Unearned by the recipient. The dead person is dead, and whether he or she earned the money or not has become irrelevant by virture of the Grim Reaper.

327 cathyf  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 7:59:10am

Just remember, though, when she used the cattle futures markets to launder bribe money, she paid proper taxes on all of her (ill-gotten) gains.

(I still can't believe that people don't get that. This is a person who either stole $100,000 from (an)other commodities customer(s), or took $100,000 in bribes and laundered it as trading "profits." And nobody seems to care.)

cathy :-)

328 Boston Patriot  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 7:59:59am

#320 alan111

Let me preface this answer by saying I only endorse the government as a protector of individual rights. That means the only proper functions of the gov't are:

-The police, to protect us from domestic thugs
-The law courts, to adjudicate disputes
-The military, to protect us from foreign thugs

So, with only these three proper departments of the government, spending, an thus tax needs, would be MUCH less than they are today. That being said:

Here's one possibility for the collection of revenue: Read the whole thing, because I know you'll laugh when reading the next sentence.

Voluntary taxation. How would it work? Simple. Every transaction that a citizen/legal entity enters into, they have a choice:

1) Voluntarily pay a percentage of the monetary value of the transaction in taxes and therefore have the government back up the contract if there is a dispute; or

2) Don't pat the voluntary tax and be hung out to dry if the other party defaults on the agreement.

No corporation in there right mind would enter into a multi-billion dollar deal without the government backing up the contract; they would pay the voluntary tax. Private citizens could judge for themselves: is buying a stick of gum worth paying a tax? Probably not. Is buying a $40,000 automobile? You bet. After all, who would want a dealer to deliver them a car that has no engine, and then have no recourse in the law courts?

329 lawhawk  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:02:18am

Tax lesson time:

Yeah, I get to show off some of the stuff I learn OTJ:

The 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cut plans, EGTRRA and JGTRRA, both sunset December 31, 2009.

In other words, the tax rates in effect prior to enacting EGTRRA and JGTRRA will take effect starting January 1, 2010.

It was the sunset provision that enabled Bush to claim that budgets would miraculously be balanced after 2010 in some of his budget forecasts.

As v the K has noted, there's plenty of stuff to cut - and it looks like I'm not the only one on here who wants to see lots of subsidies get eliminated - agricultural subsidies alone are worth over $30 billion per year.

[Link: www.uwec.edu...]

And that doesn't even start with the billions spent on foreign aid (or our military deployments in over 100 countries, that could and should be done by France and other European countries who are so worried about Anglo-Saxon influence that they should pick up the tab and fix many of the messes they created in the first place.

330 Gordon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:02:39am

#328 Boston Patriot: Interesting proposal. Ayn Rand would be proud of you.

And that's not entirely meant as an insult.

331 Colt  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:03:15am

#326 Gordon

Unearned by the recipient.

Ah. Will there be a tax on birthday gifts (besides the [American equivalent of] VAT)?

332 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:04:15am

Gordo, you obviously don't too many of my comments... I have been relentlessly critical of Bush's spending. I have called GWB the most liberal president since LBJ, and I believe that.

I just don't see John Kerry as an improvement. I know you like to characterize anyone who doesn't support your side as Bushie boot-licker, but that is manifestly not the case.

333 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:06:23am

Hell, I even think Homeland security is a boondoggle. Fire the TSA, let passengers pack heat, and put private firms in charge of scanning luggage for explosives and we wouldn't have to worry about jihadis on airplanes.

334 lazytart  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:09:46am

Alan, #320, you can like increased taxes all you wish.

But shut up yer whining when this economy absolutely slides off into the gutter, because it won't take long.

335 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:12:34am

How about a 50% tax on trust funds.

That would shut up most of the libsocs.

336 J.D.  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:12:43am

#320 alan111

What amount did YOU pay in taxes in 2003? I'm not asking about your mommy or daddy. I'm asking about YOU.

It seems I paid more than the Kerrys did, from the information they've made available.

337 lazytart  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:12:58am

A soldier's dad:

what a cutie!

338 a soldier's dad  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:14:09am
libsocs

Liking that moniker more each time I hear (read?) it...

339 alan111  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:14:21am

#328 Boston Patriot

I think that you have a good idea there in theory.

On the other hand the illicit drug and weapon dealers of the world don't pay taxes either and have no direct access to the courts for protection. That doesn't stop them from reaping billions in profits each year.

I agree with most of V the K's comments about cutting bs programmes. Agricultural subsidies are a serious waste of money and resources too.

340 Boston Patriot  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:15:00am

Gordon-

A will is a document recording a person's last action as a human being. It is simply written down in case the person is physically unable to carry out these actions in his last minutes, or he dies suddenly and thus, by default, is unable to carry out his last wishes. It does not change the fact that HE earned the money, HE wrote the will, and HE can dispose of it in any way he damn well sees fit. The recipient is IRRELEVANT in this discussion.

** Wealth is not a communal trough, to be seized by the state as soon as a person can no longer put up a fight for their contract right **. That's the ENTIRE PURPOSE of the legal document. It is the living, breathing, legally binding last wishes of a human being. To reject this is to reject the rule of law and property rights altogether.

341 a soldier's dad  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:15:38am

#337 lazytart

Thanks! Aha... it worked this time. Can you click through on the slideshow to see the other 2 shots???

342 David Simon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:16:20am

#321 Gordon - I believe you're missing the point. An individual has already been taxed on the income that built up his or her estate. The estate tax is double taxation pure and simple (and in any event, contributes a nominal percentage of the government's total tax intake. Which begs the question: Why do you think the government knows how to spend your money more wisely than you do?

343 alan111  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:21:11am

#336 JD

I pay my fair share and always have. I would be glad to pay more if it was done in an equitable fashion.

344 J.D.  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:23:19am

I live in one of the tobacco states. At a New Year's Eve party in 1999/2000, we met some well-to-do folks who took it upon themselves to explain what a great deal it was to buy a farm in order to claim all the subsidies. They had just done it as had several of their friends, they said. Practically pays for the property, everybody's doing it, they said.
Something is terribly wrong with all that.

345 Jim in Virginia  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:26:58am

Sorry if anyone has noted this already:
Drudge says Kerry will pick Hillary as veep, because of her focus on health care?
This has to be a joke. This is the woman whose health care plan was so popular it elected the first Republican Congress in 40 years.
Kerry has too much ego to pick her as #2 and then listen to the pundits for the next four months about how the ticket should be Clinton- Kerry instead.

346 Shira  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:28:36am

Merav, the only link associated with your name leads to the Yankees' website and not to an e-mail address.

Unless maybe you're the site's webmistress?

Anyway, here's my e-mail address.

347 J.D.  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:28:51am

#343 alan111

I pay my fair share and always have. I would be glad to pay more if it was done in an equitable fashion.


LOL! You don't sound very responsible, so I doubt there's much truth in your statement.

348 David Simon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:29:24am

#343 alan111 -

I would be glad to pay more if it was done in an equitable fashion.

Well, you could always do what I do and give generously to charitable and other causes that you believe in. Or are you one of those socialists who believes that that's the government's responsibility?

349 Stinky  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:32:10am

George Bush foolishly created 5 million people who will vote against him in 2004 by taking 5 million people off the tax roles. Those people now have zero interest in fiscal responsibility and tax issues, because they are no longer invested in Gov't. Who cares if the Gov't loses 2 billion dollars in the Education Department in 2000? Not my money! The reason why social spending is so popular and acceptable, w/ only superficial complaints against it, is that barely a majority of the voters (if that) pay any sort of income tax. Most who make less than 30,000 only pay Social Security.

Tax cuts isn't the answer. Tax reform is. The income and capital gains taxes need to be abolished and replaced w/ some sort of national sales tax, either on the sale or the retail sale. This would make everyone a tax payer--thus everyone has an interest in responsible gov't and efficient spending. Meanwhile, the rich still pays the most in taxes, because they buy the most crap.

Also, any country that can increase its savings rate, increases its standard of living. Let's say you have Joe Evil Republican Oil Millionaire. He has a million dollars. Three options. 1.) Gov't can take it, 2.) He can buy 10 luxurious houses, or 3.) He can save it or invest it (they are the same thing.)

1.) If the Gov't noblely takes it "for the common good" Robin Hood style, there is a good chance that less than half of that million will actually go to the poor. Some have argued that only 27 cents on the dollar goes to the poor, I'll take a more moderate approach and say that if it survives the mysterious vaccuum w/in Gov't bureacracy that can make billions of tax payer dollars disappear, 600,000 goes to the poor, free. Except the poor are now grateful if not dependent on the party that did this for them. And who knows what the poor will do with this money. People don't spend other people's money on themselves well, its almost as bad as the person who spends other people's money on others.

2.) Joe EROM selfishly builds ten mansions. Greedy, right? Sure is. But that's 10 architects who find work, that's 10 groups of day laborers who find work (potentially formerly unemployed), that's 10 groups of landscapers, plumbers, electricians, and lumberers...that's 10 groups of jobs that are going to profit form EROM's selfishness. If the gov't takes that million dollars, the Gov't is taking a million dollars from all these other people as well. Money is fluid--every dollar you or I have is going to someone else. If you steal 20 dollars from me, that's 20 dollars that isn't going to a cheap toothless whore somewhere. Wealth has not been created, and I'm ripped off, so are the people who were going to get my money. As a whole, no one has profitted. And it would be worse, if you the mugger mysteriously loses 10 dollars. All three of us, me, you, and the hooker, have lost 10 dollars in our "economy". Fed deficits that sap these reserves do the same as taxes.

3.) Joe EROM puts his money in the bank and earns a modest interest off of it. The bank then takes this million dollars, and lends five million to prospective recipients. This five million can be used to finance a new home for a working class couple that used to rent, to send a working class kid to college, to start a small business...that one million has led to the infusion of five million in the local economy. Since these are *loans*, the recipients have their feet to the fire and have to be responsible w/ it. Some may fail, others will succeed. That's more home owners, more college educated kids, more small businesses (more jobs), more inventors, and because of all this, LESS poverty...much of the Gov'ts concerns in #1 are addressed w/ the savings and investment. We lose one million in direct consumption from #2, but gain 5 million in consumption w/ #3. And on top of this, because of compounded interest, EROM will be able to build thirteen mansions a decade from now. This is how the economy grows.

Taxation sucks.

350 Boston Patriot  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:33:18am

I think all drugs should be legal, which would end 99.9% of criminal activity associated with them, but anyways...

Does the fact that robbers and thugs exist mean that we should abandon the rule of law? On the contrary, anyone who initiates the use of force or fraud (which is how the people you mentioned get paid) should be ruthlessly prosecuted by the government.

Weapons dealers should be pursued. Businessmen should be protected (when they pay the voluntary tax). ** They are complete opposites in terms of their actions and are dealt with as complete opposites by the government. I don't equate the two groups, and I fail to see how the existence of criminals somehow means that car dealers will resort to busting kneecaps if a voluntary taxation system was enacted. The system I mentioned would actually reduce their total tax burden! **

Are you suggesting businessmen would say the following:

"Well, in the past I was a law abiding businessman, but now that I'm paying less taxes than before, for the same (or better) legal protection than before, I'm going to become a criminal!!"

I don't see your logic.

351 NY Nana  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:33:49am

This literally makes me feel like puking:

VICE PRESIDENT HILLARY; SPECULATION INTENSIFIES IN WASHINGTON

Official Washington and the entire press corps will be rocked when Hillary Rodham Clinton is picked as Kerry's VP and a massive love fest will begin!

So predicts a top Washington insider, who spoke to the DRUDGE REPORT on condition he not be named.

"All the signs point in her direction," said the insider, one of the most influential and well-placed in the nation's capital. "It is the solution to every Kerry problem."

"There are three issues that this campaign will be decided on -- national security, health care, and the economy, not necessarily in that order."

"Kerry believes that no one is better on national security than he is, he served in Vietnam after all, so he has that covered and the suggestion that he needs to strengthen the ticket with someone who has national security credentials is dismissed as foolish."

The insider continues: "The Democrats feel like health care is the domestic issue. But how to make it the dominant topic of conversation -- break through war and terrorism? Hillary Clinton. She catapults it out front with her commission. She tried to provide health care before and the Republicans in congress attacked her and her husband and used a bunch of scandals dirty tricks to stop it, we know they are scandals and dirty tricks because the former president book says so. So now you have the number two person on the ticket who is a 'health care expert' and what will Republicans do? Attack on health care pointing to her commission saying that it was government medicine. Her response -- it wasn't, and the Republicans are a bunch of dirty tricksters, "Liars and Crooks," as Kerry calls them, and its been too long and Democrats wont let the Republicans do it to them again. By the way, it puts prescription drugs on the back burner, the Republicans health care ace. You will have a fully engaged national debate on health care from now until the election."

"The Democrats economic plan is to say Bush sucks, it's never enough, we must get back to the Clinton Era when 22 million jobs were created. You can't do much better at making that point then-- Kerry/Clinton 2004.

"But what about impeachment and Monica -- wont that overshadow her being picked? It' now been covered in the book. Not only that, but she is a women scorned who has dealt with what so many American women deal with and stuck it out to keep her family together. And Whitewater? It's in the book. Vince Foster? Book. Billing records, White House travel Office? Book, book. All have been covered. All Republican slime tactics.

"Why would Kerry make such a public spectacle about trying to get John Mccain, wont whoever you pick be considered a second choice. Not if it is Hillary!

"There are differences of opinion about how this election will be won but one school says its all about the base. Republicans are bumping up against the ceiling with support from their base and Democrats are sitting on the floor. This would change that.

"Official Washington and national media will fall in love with the idea immediately letting Kerry/Clinton dominate the news through July and up to the Republican convention. She will say she is doing it for the good of the country. I am convinced this is going to happen."

"But what Hillary about having to wait to run for president? If Bush wins then she is the nominee for 2008 because it will be all Kerry's fault. If she wins she is the first woman VP of the United States, which would help her become the first woman president of the U.S. It would be historic in its own right and change the nature of politics in this country, and mark her place in the history books for ever-- a different history than her husbands."

Developing...

352 J.D.  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:36:26am
353 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:38:12am
"Republicans are bumping up against the ceiling with support from their base and Democrats are sitting on the floor. This would change that."

Funny, I see it exactly the opposite way.

354 NY Nana  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:40:23am

Meanwhile, when a Boston dem, who happens to be the Mayor, says this: Menino lets loose: Mayor slams ‘incompetent’ Kerry camp
, then Hanoi john already has a problem, but hillary? Oy!

Ah, Boston, at least the politics have never changed, and in this case, it could actually be a plus.

G-d help us all...hil/Hanoi john? A match made in hell.

355 zulubaby  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:41:23am

I see voicing my premonition didn't work :-(

356 Colt  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:44:05am

If anything, it made it more likely to happen... ;-)

357 Renna  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 8:45:37am

Sales taxes are double taxation as well since we were taxed when we earned it, taxed when we spent it. Taxed when it sits there (property taxes). Taxed, taxed, taxed.

I don't have to defend my right to keep my own money. The onus is on the pro-tax person to justify taking my personal property. Earned or unearned, what difference is that to you? If I win it at blackjack or it is a gift from my parent, it may be "unearned" but so what? Why does that mean the recipient longer has a right to it? Or that the state does?

358 Mike7411  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 9:00:12am

And whom may I ask decides what, where and who is for the common good.

Would that be Miss Commie Mommy, Would be ruler of The World, The one, The only, can't keep her hubby in her own bed, and interns off their knees in her own house, Miss Clitoon and her band of merry freaks.


Mike7411

359 alan111  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 9:01:11am

#350 Boston Patriot

I agree with most of your post.

I was using the drug dealers to demonstrate that an honest system would not work. The most efficient tax dodgers are the wealthy.

I could not see people paying an honesty tax. Most business transactions are enacted between two parties on the basis of trust. Most business relationships are medium to long term.

Why is someone going to pay a voluntary tax on a transaction when, in the vast majority of cases, the transaction is going to go smoothly. People will pay 0.5 to 1.0% for similar protection from an insurance company. They won't be willing to pay 5-20% to the state if they can help it.

The system you mentioned would not work in my opinion


#347 JD

LOL! You don't sound very responsible, so I doubt there's much truth in your statement.

I like your style, it is clear that you have had the benefit of a great education. I'm dead in the water.

#348 David

I agree. People should put their money where their mouth is. I don't remember calling myself a socialist however, unless you are mixing me up with someone else.

360 a soldier's dad  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 9:02:14am

#358 zilly


Git on outta heah, nut, 'fore I throw ya to the reptiles.

GAZE

361 J.D.  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 9:12:39am

alan111

I like your style, it is clear that you have had the benefit of a great education. I'm dead in the water.


LOL! If only!

362 TMF  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 9:18:04am
rich folk

Now its channeling Malcolm X or COrnel West or one of those other "plain" speaking intellectual losers.

363 Gordon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 9:22:15am

#332 V the K: So if Kerry wins, I get:

the same profligate spending I have under Bush
more tax receipts, so at least the deficit and use of tax money to pay interest doesn't go up as much
"social" policies I agree with (e.g.funding stem cell research)

And if Bush wins I get better national security.

Another great choice, brought to you by the Republicans and the Democrats.

364 Momzilla  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 9:22:21am

Recent exchange with my brother:

HIM: Bush only cut taxes to the rich. I didn't see a tax cut.
ME: We did, and we're sure as hell not rich. (I might note here that he and my husband make approximately the same money, except that my husband supports a family of five; my brother is a bachelor.)
HIM: Well, the 30% increases in college tuition more than take care of that.
ME: What 30% increase? I didn't see a 30% increase.
HIM: I read all about it. 30% increases in tuition at state and county colleges over the past four years.
ME: Not our state and county. I know because I've been writing them checks for the past four years. Sounds like a state rather than federal issue to me.
HIM: ...
HIM: Well, Kerry plans to do something about all these jobs going overseas.
ME: Yeah! He plans to take back the money I'm using toward my kids' college tuition to give tax incentives to rich corporations to hire staff they would have hired anyway.
HIM: ... I didn't know what his plan was ...
ME: *rolls eyes* Wouldn't it be a good idea to find out what his plan is before you vote for the man?
MOM: Anybody want cake?

365 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 9:27:03am
the same profligate spending I have under Bush

No, you get Bush's reckless spending and at least $1.5 trillion more on top of it.

366 Gordon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 9:32:12am

#349 Stinky: A national sales tax would be a regressive tax. The definition of a regressive tax is one which taxes poorer people a GREATER percentage of their income than it does rich people. A person earning #20,000 would pay $500 in sales taxes on the items she bought (2.5%) while a person earning $200,000 would pay $2,000 on the items she bought (1%). This is regressive, and is a seriously bad idea.

On the other hand, a flat tax is a good idea. I don't necessarily buy the idea that people who earn more should pay a greater percentage of their income in taxes (the so-called "progressive" tax system we have today). I would tax interest and dividends, though, at the same rate as income.

I know, I know, "double taxation!" some will scream. Well, as my fairly conservative Income Tax Law professor says, the double taxation argument is a crock of ---. The tax system is rife with double taxation - you could argue that any business that pays a salary to an employee is subject to double taxation, tax on the business, tax on the employee. And when the employee buys a car, the profit is taxable income to the car dealer. It's now triple taxation. And when the car dealer uses the money to make a mortgage payment, the profit is taxable income to the mortgage holder. It's now quadruple taxation. The argument holds no water in the cold light of logic.

367 Renna  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 9:34:52am
more tax receipts

Kerry is going to cut taxes too!?

368 Buckeye Abroad  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 9:34:58am

#358 silly

The Bush taxcut for the rich...

All tax cuts benefit those who have high incomes as they are the onse paying the most taxes.

US Inome Taxes - 1999 Stats

Let them keep their money as they intend to either spend it locally (buying US goods and servcies) or investing it (creating opportunities for new businesses = new jobs).

Hillary reminds us that when the Democrats get elected, the government will again work for all of the people.

Not quite right. When democrats get elected, the people will work more for the government (most Americans work from Jan-May just to pay their annual taxes now) and receive less quality services at higher costs.

Hillary reminds me of Joe Stalin, but to each his own.

369 a soldier's dad  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 9:48:57am

#365 Momzilla

Good job!!! (standing ovation)

370 Jim in Virginia  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 9:51:23am

Re Hilary as Veep: a Washington Post oped a week or so ago (I looked but couldn’t track it down) listed reasons for fake leaks. One was that the Republicans (or Nader, or Hilary, or Drudge) create a completely false story to take the edge off Kerry’s announcement of, say, Mary Landrieu.
Kerry- Clinton? I’ll believe it when I see it.

371 Stinky  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 10:00:12am

367 Gordon

Most sales tax proponents suggest a national rebate to help the poor cover the cost of the sales tax for food, shelter, clothes, health services, ect. Some suggest a rebate for *everyone*. This would be a way to mitigate the regressive aspects of a sales tax. So if a poor person has a tax increase of 500 dollars because of the sales tax, the Gov't would give 500 dollars to everyone, rich, middle class or poor. It would barely cover the tax increase on the wealthy, but it would greatly help the poor and middle class on the purchase of necessities. And again--any country that increases its savings rate, increases its standard of living. Whatever costs are placed on the purchase of luxury items, will be more than made up for in the influx of money via savings and investment. More savings, more jobs, higher income. Which means more money to purchase those goods that were forsaken for a while in order to save, so in the long run, more is consumed than if the savings rate had remained the same. An increase of savings may lead to a small recession, as Wall-Mart would sell fewer DVDs and the Olive Garden would have fewer customers, but given time, the country would be (much) better off.

A flat tax is better than what exists now, but one of the problems w/ all forms of income taxation is that the wealthy displace the costs of their personal taxation--which is fairly easy to predict relative to predicting one's taxation on purchases over the span of a year--on their employees and consumers. If you tax a business, that business will merely raise prices or cut benefits to meet the cost imposed by the Gov't. In other words, you and I pay for the income and capital gains taxes of the wealthy, whether its a "progressive" tax or a "flat" tax or a "regressive" tax.

The national retail sales tax is a bipartisan initiative,, and the library there gives links to various articles explaining the "regressive" aspect and the overall benefits of such a plan.

372 Ol' Southern Boy  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 10:02:17am

Hillary as Veep? Makes a sick kind of sense.

It occurred to me that, if the Neosocs want Hillary as President in '08, it would be best that Kerry lose now. If Kerry wins in '04, the Neosocs have a dilemma in '08: do they ask him to step aside to let Hillary take her shot, or do they ask Hillary to wait another four years before she gets her chance to run?

If she's elected as the veep now, at least she's on the team by the time '08 rolls around, and they might have an easier time convincing Kerry to step aside in '08 -- especially if she proves to be the real power within the Kerry administration.

373 Capt. Queeg  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 10:51:59am

Hillary as the VP nominee is the most retarded thing I've ever heard of. If she ends up the VP nominee, Kerry should be horse-whipped.

Kerry is a mighty small figure standing next to HRC.

374 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 11:04:49am

Suppose Kerry does win, riding a wave of unreasoned Bush-hatred. Then, what? Are the democrats going to calm down and go back to sanity... or will Kerry be obligated to punish and purge? Do we really want key cabinet positions filled by people who believe that Bush lied and Michael Moore is the portrait of honesty and integrity? What about Kerry's judicial nominations? Kerry voted to sustain filibusters on Bush's nominees on purely ideological reasons. Does this mean it's fair game for Republicans to retaliate against appointees they see as too liberal?

Building a campaign on hate has really scary consequences.

375 Ackomanyuki  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 11:06:10am

I have always been perplexed as to how someone could be in the vicinity of burning pot and not inhale, even second hand smoke or a joint on the lips would be to some degree inhaled, though perhaps not willingly. So in light of this argument perhaps the President is an honest man, intent being the measure of guilt. However, given the weakness of the chaffe weed that was going around in the sixties and the over indulgent nature of the Clinton's, I must reconsider my judgement. There are other methods of introducing 'THE WEED THAT TURNS INTO A FLOWER IN YOUR MIND' to the metabolisim. I think that this photo makes Bill an honest man. Given their expressions, I would have to surmise that these two clowns ate the whole pan of brownies and didn't save any "for the common good"

376 RightIsRight  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 11:31:39am

#366 Gordon

Your double-taxation analogy is flawed.

You cite 4 different entities paying the taxes. What upsets fiscal conservatives, such as me, is the double-taxation of the SAME entity (i.e. me, when I cash out a profitable stock that I purchased with my AFTER tax income).

377 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 11:32:58am

Found this nugget on the Corner:

In his 1959 book, Up From Liberalism, William F. Buckley Jr., not only anticipated Hillary Clinton's confession, "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good," he also explained why she can feel so righteous about forcing the rest of us to finance her utopian fantasies: "The liberal sees no moral problem whatever in divesting the people of that portion of their property necessary to finance the projects certified by ideology as beneficial to the Whole."

Makes me think about Gordo's fatuous praise of mass transit as a "solution" to oil imports. Ridiculous. The FedGov could quintuple spending on mass transit, and still not make a dent in oil imports because the concept of mass transit is fundamentally flawed. Basically, mass transit requires people to choose a mode of transport that offers no individual privacy, only operates on a government-dictated schedule, and only goes to government-designated drop-off points that may or may not be convenient to the traveler --- over a mode of transport (the automobile) that offers privacy, comfort, and point-to-point travel on the consumer's schedule. The only time people opt for public transport is a.) when they are unable to avail themselves of automotive transport or b.) when they live in compact, densely populated, autmobile-unfriendly urban areas such as New York City.

378 steve miller  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:01:47pm

heh. You said "fatuous" with regards to the site pest.

379 LtTw  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:10:39pm

"the common good."

Yep, she's honest.

But I didn't expect her to admit publicly that she's "common."

The Republicans freed the slaves.

The Democrats broke up families to establish "welfare queens."

That's why African Americans are so grateful to the Democrats for the fatherless boys who wind up in prison and the mothers of 10 (by 8 fathers) who live in rat- and roach-infested tenements.

Maybe Hilabill can get away with it, after all.

Time to pray harder...

380 Ackomanyuki  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:26:39pm

#366

Gordon, you are a true weakling. I will not elaborate on my household income, but, I will tell you that my two working adult household consists of one attorney (insurance and med-mal defence plus civil rights and child advocacy for balance) and one custom home builder, who spent a greater percentage of our income in the consumer market than we did when we were waitresses and carpenters while attending college. We are not rich and and I wouldn't consider our working for 60 to 70 hours a week as a comfortable lifestyle. A consumer tax as federal income would tax those who by all those evil SUVs, Yachts and Vacation homes (none of which I own) greater than those who buy only necessities. It is a just tax as it taxes largress equally, but not the income from the efforts of the industrious, such as myself and my wife. Personally though I would prefer a flat income tax with exemptions on consumer intrest, healthcare and education, but not childcare The chilcare component would only further encourage the baby machines that currently think WIC is a source of income and not a stipend to lessen the impovorishment that having children one cannot afford causes. Oh yeah, I am 44 and had my first child last year. After 28 years of hard work and self-control, I can finally afford to provide for the nourishment of what I hope will be an accomplished and just individual.

381 Gordon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:27:04pm

#376 Right is Right: What you cite is not double taxation at all. The principal you invested in the stock (upon which you paid taxes) is not taxed again. What is taxed is the profit you made on the stock. This had never been taxed.

The only instance of true double taxation on an individual which comes to mind is the invidual who also is the sole owner of an incorporated business. The business pays taxes on its profits. The owner takes a salary on those profits. The owner pays taxes on his salary.

But, technically, the corporation and the invidual are separate entities, so it isn't really double taxation on the same individual.

382 Gordon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:28:40pm

#378: Do you have anything to add to the discussion on taxes, or do you intend to just play the site a-hole as usual?

383 Gordon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:36:20pm

#377 V the K: Quintupling spending on mass transit PLUS a huge new tax on gasoline will do the trick. I would assume that you would agree that it is in our national security interest to reduce our dependence on oil from Saudi Arabia, not to mention other paragons of national stability such as Iraq, Venezuela, Nigeria, and Indonesia.

You undoubtedly have no problem with governmental coercion to protect our national security in other areas, such as the USA Patriot Act. Why is this any different?

And, although I don't know if this applies to you personally, it always amuses me to see people who want no government coercion in areas they don't agree with, such as mass transit, but have no problem with the government telling women they can't have an abortion, or use contraceptives, or the government telling people they don't have the right to have their life ended when they want it ended, or the government telling people they don't have the right to smoke pot to relieve their glaucoma.

384 piglet  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:49:00pm

I have always thought it a good idea to move away from dependance on oil, but Gordon agreeing with me
has me checking myself.

It is interesting, that had the us developed mass transit at the turn of the century (1900) we would not have had the huge factories like GM and ford that were turned into
weapons factories that turned out thousands of planes, trucks tanks, etc.


As for Hilery: Ask not what your country can do for you, but what can it take from you...

385 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:50:42pm
Quintupling spending on mass transit PLUS a huge new tax on gasoline will do the trick.

More likely, it would just cause a recession. One comment, you bitch because of runaway government spending, the next, you advocate massive budget expenditures for mass transit nobody wants or uses. You wonder why people think you're an irrational tool?

Not to mention the display of willful leftist arrogance. "The Government has defined a good (mass transit) and now will use coercive means to force the proles to use it, even though they will be deprived of their freedom to travel wherever, whenever, and in a manner of their choosing."

The rest of your argument is straw man territory. No one in the Bush admin is actively pushing to outlaw abortion. Outlawing partial-birth abortion --- which even the democrat Pat Moynihan acknowledged was a euphemism for nfanticide, yes and rightfully so... and there is an interest in protecting viable human life outside the womb. Parental notification is also something most Americans support with regard to abortion.

And frankly, I think assisted suicide is not an issue there needs to be a public policy on. In the old days, it was a private matter for a physician to prescribe medication and explain to the patient how much constituted a lethal dose. And polite people did not discuss it. That is how it ought to be... no public policy, no necrophiles like Jack Kevorkian hyping it up.

And your advocacy of marijuana legalization I think goes a long way to explaining the deficiencies in your thought processes. Look at your hands, dude, they're huge... and they can touch everything but themselves.

386 Jim in Virginia  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:55:52pm

383 Gordon- the only way mass transit will work is if Americans give up their single family houses on quarter acre lots, and their garden office complexes in the suburbs, to live and work in dense urban concentrations like Manhattan. Buses and light rail in LA or Houston may take a few folks out of their cars but for most of us, becuase of where we live and work, a carpool or a hybrid is the only realistic option for reducing our use of gasoline.

387 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 12:59:11pm
a carpool or a hybrid is the only realistic option for reducing our use of gasoline.

I'll consider a hybrid when they become economical. But understand... what appeals less to Gordo and the Lefty Ilk is less the fuel savings and more the power over people's lives. Take their cars away from them (power rush). Force them into inefficient public transit. (power rush). Make them vulnerable to the whims and schedules of the bureacracy. (power rush).

Not to mention... all of those unionized transit workers and their democratic campaign contributions...

388 Jim in Virginia  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 1:02:57pm

V the K- not to mention that they really know what is best for everyone.
Mass transit and Marxism: it would work, it just hasn't been done correctly yet.

389 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 1:11:29pm
390 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 1:21:55pm
391 Rayra[deleted]  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 1:33:40pm
392 Gordon  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:27:03pm

#385 V the K: Mass transit is NOT a communist plot. You still haven't answered my argument about policies which will reduce the Saudi hand on our throat.

As for the idyllic suburban lifestyle, it is becoming less idyllic, and many are returning to smaller lots, even multi-family apartments and condominiums, in the cities. When they can. Because the freedom-loving government you so adore has been subsidizing suburban sprawl since the 1940's with cheap loans and dis-investing cities decay, plus destroying them with superhighways to carry the subsidized suburban cars through. And when the proposed lots get too small, NIMBY neighbors use the coercive powers of their local government to stop the communist plot that a 5,000 square foot lot entails.

So dump the "power over people's lives" crap. The government exerted its power to subsidize the car-culture you crave.

393 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 2:49:04pm

Gordo-logic: People don't really want spacious homes in quiet suburbs. People would much rather live in crappy 400 sq. foot over-priced rat-nest apartments. It's only the Government that forces them to live in the suburbs. Deep down, people don't really want quiet streets, low crime, and better schools. They don't want the freedom of mobility that automobiles afford. They want to be dependent on public transportation.

You know what really drives sprawl. Could it possibly have something to do three million legal and illegal immigrants every year? A city the size of Los Angeles plopped on the American landscape every year? An issue the "environmental" movement is interestingly silent about.

But, really, ... and my "Trail of Tears" comment on the other thread got me to thinking about this... the idea of taking something away from some people and giving it to others goes way bay in the Democratic Party. Andrew Jackson thought taking land away from Indians and giving it to white people was "for the common good." Antebellum democrats thought taking freedom and labor away from colored people and giving it to white folks was "for the common good." And now, Hillary thinks taking money away from people who work hard and earn it and giving it away to political cronies and bureaucrats is "for the common good."

So, basically, taking stuff away from some people and giving to others is just the Democrat way...

394 CrusaderGirl  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:20:04pm

I can't believe she said that. Even if she does think it; I can't imagine a calculating psycho like Hillary would ever say that.

But, now that she has all I can say in reply is:

hands off my money, bitch

395 V the K  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:37:19pm

As PJ O'Rourke famously wrote, the two imperatives of government ought to be "1. Mind your own business. 2. Keep your hands to yourself."

Hillary, mind your own business. Bill, keep your hands to yourself.

396 struan al kufr  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 3:41:45pm

If she'd just dish on the cattle futures secret we'd all have so much more she'd could take away.

C'mon, Hill - lil' insider trading there?

What's that...?

Martha who?

Naw, doan worry 'bout that shit - just like Connie Chung and Newt's mommy - y'know, jes between you and me.

397 coastygirl  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:16:21pm

The tax cuts have helped ME very much, thank you. I am not wealthy AT ALL. 33 years old and I've never had a drivers license because I can't afford insurance. And I blame only myself. Anyway, tax cuts help pay my daughters tuition, even though taxes pay something like 10,000 PER KID to public schools and yet they don't have enough money.
The lady a few apts away from me has 4 kids by 3 fathers, EVERYTHING handed to them on a silver platter including all summer passes to the aquatic center, because they're so poor and impoverished. And my old neighbor a few years back, the POOR heroin addict who got section 8, food stamps, AND social security DISABILITY. (My mother is blind, and she did not choose to be blind, a druggie CHOSE to do drugs, how the hell is that a disability on par with a genuine handicap? BTW my mother does volunteer work and is a useful tax payer. she collects ONLY SS, not section 8 and assorted other goodies.)
URG! I know I'm making no sense. I work hard for the little I make, and I'm a chump, apparently. I want to keep more of the money that I earned(and I do earn it, I don't believe it's a clock watching entitlement).
Sorry about my rant GRRR.

398 Frank IBC  Wed, Jun 30, 2004 5:49:10pm

Abolish most or all of the Departments of Commerce, Agriculture, Labor, Housing and Urban Development, Energy, Interior, and Education, and no one would notice save a few special interest groups, and we'd be billions of dollars richer for it.

399 Kalev  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 12:07:49am

#284 Boston Patriot

No, I'm not an altruist. I would not expect, nor advocate, that the wealthy be in some way forced into something resembling altruism. The expectation, however, that they pay more in taxation for the benefit of all (including themselves!) is perfectly reasonable and far more moral than the blind materialist selfishness that you appear to consider the height of moral development. If a wealthy person has to forgo the pleasure of buying a Ferrari and instead settle for a Lotus because of having to pay a little extra tax that is no great sacrifice. Sacrifices great and small are a part of everyday life for everyone: I can't afford to go to New York for a holiday this year but I do plan to take my wife for a long weekend in Prague. The issue is not about the 'nobility of sacrifice' but should be about the effective use of tax income by government. Instead of quibbling about paying tax we should be demanding that governments use our taxes well and for good purposes - not, for example, to subsidise lesbians having IVF treatment or to featherbed civil servants.

400 Kalev  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 12:23:48am

Oh boy, there sure are some big chips on shoulders over there in the States.

#143 V the K - why should "Princess Hillary" be the one to decide? Well, who said she was going to be the dictator making the decision all by herself. I thought the USA was a pluralist democracy with Representatives and a house of review and lobby groups and a President and, gosh, voters like you. So I guess maybe you'd better ask some of them.

I personally have no allegiance or fondness for the Democratic Party or any of the Clintons. Neither do I have any respect for blinkered idealogues who resort to crass exaggeration to make a dubious point.

Which brings me to #148 Thom:

Clinton wants the "nationalization of wealth"? Yeah, right, that's really on the cards - even the Labour Party here in the UK finally ditched its notorious Clause 4 calling for the nationalisation of the means of production years ago. Get real.
I don't like paying taxes - and believe me I bet I pay a far larger proportion of my mediocre income in taxes than you lucky guys out in the USA. I would like to pay less in tax but not if it means that I'll end up spending loads of money in inefficient private health insurance because the National Health Service has gone down the tubes (and it's not like the NHS is such a wonderful service but at least they'll treat me for pre-existing conditions).

You guys in the States have got it pretty good - don't spoil it by being plain bloody greedy.

401 Thom  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 12:50:07am

#400 Kalev

What can I say? You are a socialist. At best, a socialist-lite.

Clinton wants the "nationalization of wealth"?

If they could get away with it (and they are working overtime laying the foundations for "getting away with it") you're damn right they/she would.

I would like to pay less in tax but not if it means that I'll end up spending loads of money in inefficient private health insurance because the National Health Service has gone down the tubes (and it's not like the NHS is such a wonderful service but at least they'll treat me for pre-existing conditions).

So, to recap:

1) You would like to pay less in taxes;
2) But not if it impacts socialized medicine;
3) Even though the socialized medicine system sucks;
4) But at least they pay for pre-existing conditions;

which leads to the rather large implication that:

5) Heaven forfend that a free market should be allowed to work and evolve to the best damn system of private health care the world has ever seen.

I don't like paying taxes - and believe me I bet I pay a far larger proportion of my mediocre income in taxes than you lucky guys out in the USA.

I'll bet you do pay a far larger chunk of your money in taxes than I do. I bet you do.

And that is not nationalization of wealth ... in what sense, precisely?

You say that you don't like it, but at the same time you don't want the system to change.

I.e., you like it.

With all respect, you really need to re-think this. They take your money, "provide" you with a crappy health care system, and you're happy with that?

You guys in the States have got it pretty good - don't spoil it by being plain bloody greedy.

This is not altruism ... in what sense?!

I like being greedy. I want to be greedy.

Yes, we have it pretty good here in the States. Why? Because our slide into socialism has been slower than in most countries.

402 Thom  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 1:00:13am
The expectation, however, that they pay more in taxation for the benefit of all (including themselves!) is perfectly reasonable and far more moral than the blind materialist selfishness that you appear to consider the height of moral development.

LMAO!!! Hillary herself couldn't have put it better! Altruism at its finest (?).

Oh wait. Maybe she did ...

“Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you,” Sen. Clinton said. “We’re saying that for America to get back on track, we’re probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”
403 Thom  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 1:07:42am

Kalev, honestly, your posts are a treasure trove of the worst tropes of socialism.

If a wealthy person has to forgo the pleasure of buying a Ferrari and instead settle for a Lotus because of having to pay a little extra tax that is no great sacrifice.

And where does it end?

Is settling for a used Yugo because I can't afford a used Escort too much of a sacrifice?

I would not expect, nor advocate, that the wealthy be in some way forced into something resembling altruism.

Which you contradcited in your very next sentence!

It's not altruism if we take your money by force.

Holy crap.

The issue is not about the 'nobility of sacrifice' but should be about the effective use of tax income by government.

But you see, until that sentence, not one of your statements has been about government use of taxes. Every one of your statements has been about the nobility, morality, and necessity of sacrificing for the "common good".

In your country, you may be a rabid conservative, but that only means that conservatism is dead in your country.

404 V the K  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 1:21:41am

Well done, Thom.

405 Thom  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 1:33:34am

#404 V the K

Thanks. I hope Kalev checks back in ...

406 V the K  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 1:40:47am

Let me add one thing though. Why is people like Kalev, Gordo, and Hillary label people "greedy" for simply wanting the discretion to spend our own income on our own families. But they will never call a politician or a bureaucrat greedy when they demand the right to confiscate someone else's money?

I wonder if Andrew Jackson thought the Indians were greedy for not being glad to turn over their land "on behalf of the common good."

407 Thom  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 1:49:02am

#406 V the K

Let me add one thing though. Why is people like Kalev, Gordo, and Hillary label people "greedy" for simply wanting the discretion to spend our own income on our own families. But they will never call a politician or a bureaucrat greedy when they demand the right to confiscate someone else's money?

According to them, concern with one's own self-interest is "greedy" (and therefore immoral). Being immoral, the self is deligitimized and replaced by the interests of the "state", as defined by The Mob™.

It's an insane, destructive mindset that I have trouble expressing.

408 V the K  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 1:50:48am

In other words, the leftist sees no greed in the politician's desire for power, and no greed in the bureaucrat's lust for other people's money.

409 Thom  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 2:05:55am

It would seem so since, after all, they are working for "the common good".

{shudder}

410 Frank IBC  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 2:38:37am

#399 Kalev -

It looks like you haven't thought out your opinions very carefully, else you might have noticed the glaring contradictions. Or perhaps you think your constant refrain of "I'm not...BUT..." somehow magically negates these contradicitons?

One side of Kalev's mouth:

No, I'm not an altruist. I would not expect, nor advocate, that the wealthy be in some way forced into something resembling altruism.

Other side of Kalev's mouth:

The expectation, however, that they pay more in taxation for the benefit of all (including themselves!) is perfectly reasonable and far more moral than the blind materialist selfishness that you appear to consider the height of moral development.

Other side of Kalev's mouth:

If a wealthy person has to forgo the pleasure of buying a Ferrari and instead settle for a Lotus because of having to pay a little extra tax that is no great sacrifice. Sacrifices great and small are a part of everyday life for everyone: I can't afford to go to New York for a holiday this year but I do plan to take my wife for a long weekend in Prague.

Can't you see the difference between compulsory, government-mandated, altruistic sacrifice, and sacrifice based on rational self-interest? You can't just wave the magic wand and say "but I'm not an altruist" to reconcile your contradictions.

The issue is not about the 'nobility of sacrifice'

Translation: "I think sacrifice is a good thing, but I'm too lazy to defend it on principle, I'll just throw in a couple of anecdotes to distract these greedy Americans."

but should be about the effective use of tax income by government. Instead of quibbling about paying tax we should be demanding that governments use our taxes well and for good purposes - not, for example, to subsidise lesbians having IVF treatment or to featherbed civil servants.

If we don't have the right to "quibble about taxes", then why would we have the right to "demand that governments use our taxes well and for good purposes"?

#400

I don't like paying taxes - and believe me I bet I pay a far larger proportion of my mediocre income in taxes than you lucky guys out in the USA. I would like to pay less in tax but not if it means that I'll end up spending loads of money in inefficient private health insurance because the National Health Service has gone down the tubes (and it's not like the NHS is such a wonderful service but at least they'll treat me for pre-existing conditions).

You're spending more for your NHS. It's from those things called "taxes" which we were just talking about but which you seem to have forgotten already.

News flash: Many private insurers (but not all) in the USA DO cover many preexisting conditions.

You guys in the States have got it pretty good - don't spoil it by being plain bloody greedy.

We have got it "pretty good" over here PRECISELY because we're "greedy" and we insist that individuals have more authority to decide what happens to our hard-earned money, and government is much less intrusive in our lives than in Europe. That's why America is a thriving land of initiative and opportunity and why Europe is a cesspool of sloth and despond. Why don't you get this?

411 V the K  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 2:45:52am

If Hillary is so damned concerned about the "Common Good" why didn't she donate her $8 million dollar book advance to charity? Why does Queen Hillary travel in chauffered limousines and Chevy Suburbans instead of using mass transit?

From where I stand, she looks a lot more like Leona Helmsley than Mother Theresa.

412 WriterMom  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 2:51:06am

VtheK

You got it. And why is the ketchup queen reluctant to show her tax returns? If money is not so great, why don't they all live on communes? Get rid of their evil greenbacks?

Humourless, earnest, stupid socialists. The whole Berlin Wall came crumbling down and these people still want to plan out your life for you. Feh.

413 Owl  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 5:56:36am

Ditto everyone. What a great place this is. Esp. ditto on the Atta-boy for Mr. Charles. Thank you do much. This is my favorite site, period.

Who was George Washington?
/ hee hee hee

414 V the K  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 6:58:32am

Also, notice how Gordo lacks the intellectual honesty to admit that democrats benefit themselves through expanded public spending by way of increased donations from public employee unions. Instead, he tosses off hollow rhetoric about "communist plots."

I'll say it again, if he were any more of a tool, the word "Craftsman" would be engraved on his forehead.

415 Gordon  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 7:01:04am

Well, it seems this thread has turned into a laissez-faire circle jerk.

416 piglet  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 7:06:54am

Comes down to cows:

[Link: brneurosci.org...]

Here is the hypothetical situation: Your neighbor has 3 cows, you have one cow. How do different economic systems deal with this situation?

Communism: The government takes two cows away from your neighbor and sends them into orbit to prove the communist system is better. Your neighbor is sent to Siberia for being a landowner. You are sent to Siberia for being a troublemaker. The capitalists, shocked about the orbiting cows, are spurred into action and land cows on the moon a few years later. Your economy cannot compete and dissolves into chaos.

Fascism: Your neighbor is shot for not having the proper papers for his cows. All four cows are taken away and forced to work in a slave labor camp making missiles. You are then shot for not having any cows.

Socialism: The government takes one cow from your neighbor and gives it to you. Then it takes one cow from each of you in taxes. The two cows are given to poor people, who require continuous government handouts to keep their cows from starving. The government continually raises taxes. Eventually both you and your neighbor are forced to sell your remaining cows to pay the taxes.

American capitalism: The person with 3 cows becomes rich by renting one of his cows to you. Then he takes his cow back and uses the profit to buy your cow from you, leaving him with 4 cows and you with none.

European capitalism: The government discovers that cows cause global warming and you are forced sell your cow to pay for expensive emission control devices. There is no market for cows. It is considered gauche to eat beef, and killing a cow is considered a form of genocide. Your neighbor is tried in the International Criminal Court for running a cow slavery ring. The government sets limits on the number of cows it can have, then exceeds them.

417 V the K  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 7:20:45am

#415 --- Keep flinging the rhetorical monkey dung, Gordo.

418 V the K  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 7:25:15am

#416 --- What about Hillary's Third-Way? Two of the cows are confiscated and sold to Archie Daniels Midland (who gave generously to HillPAC and EMILY'S List in the last round of elections). ADM sells the meat and their taxes are confiscated to support a prescription drug plan that provides viagra to welfare recipients with AIDS.

419 Frank IBC  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 9:39:40am

Two or more persons in concurring disagreement with Gordon

= "Circle Jerk"

{sigh}

420 Frank IBC  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 9:41:44am

V the K -

I'll say it again, if he were any more of a tool, the word "Craftsman" would be engraved on his forehead.

More likely the trademark is "Acme". :P

421 steve miller  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 10:59:29am

FWIW, I'm submitting my votekick for this troll.

422 V the K  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 11:43:07am

Barring a major outbreak of abuse, I wouldn't vote Gordo off the island. I'll tell you why.

Gordo is a useful reminder that thinly hidden beneath the surface of every libsocdem... even if they occasionally sound reasonable... (And Every once in a while, he says something sane and reasonable. It's kind of like ... bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, quarter, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit...) ... is a misanthropic troll who substitutes slogans for arguments and can't reason his way past a bumper-sticker level of political sophistication, who reaches for shopworn epithets ("circle jerk" "freeper") when his threadbare bag of ideas runs out, and who attaches himself to left-wing causes because being a part of a movement is his only source of ego validation.

423 Frank IBC  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 8:25:49pm

Zulubaby, if you're on this thread -

Could you count the number of times Gordo has claimed to be "conservative"?

It should be good for a few chuckles.

424 zulubaby  Thu, Jul 1, 2004 8:33:08pm

Frank IBC, I didn't know he'd ever claimed that! LOL. Do you think he understands what it means?

425 V the K  Fri, Jul 2, 2004 1:41:21am

Gordo claims to be a conservative? That reminds me of those episodes of Married... with Children when Bud Bundy claimed to be a Hollywood producer.

426 insomni  Fri, Jul 2, 2004 3:22:29am

Did all lefties miss the part in math class about percentages? See, you can keep the tax percentage the same and the rich will still pay more money than those with lower incomes! It's magical. (Sorry if anyone hit on this point already -- way too many posts to read before heading off ot work.)

Oh, and Ayn Rand absolutely wrote the script (mockingly, of course) for the libs. I'm glad that's clear to others as well.

"From each according to his ability to each according to his need."

427 Frank IBC  Fri, Jul 2, 2004 4:33:08am

I just read Goredean's profile.

Luckily I haven't eaten yet. :(


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

  • Loading...

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

He's got a head on him like a rabbit.

Follow Lizardoid on Twitter

 Frank says:

Stupidity has a certain charm -- ignorance does not.