LGF

more options

  

Advertisement

bias at nyt

Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:50:04 am PST

In a grotesquely worshipful article at the NY Times, James Bennet praises Raed al-Karmi, terrorist. This outrageously biased piece is accompanied by a photo of a bandaged Karmi with the caption: “The late Raed al-Karmi in September, after Israelis attacked him.” Bennet has consistently been a Palestinian apologist, but in this one he outdoes himself.

Israel calls Raed al-Karmi a terrorist, but here Palestinian children wear pictures of him on cords around their necks. Grown men sing a song praising him as "the Promise."

Children love him! Grown men sing songs about him! How bad can he be?

While the government did not claim responsibility for Mr. Karmi's death, the office of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon released a detailed statement this afternoon calling him a "leading extremist of a murderous Tanzim cell" and describing what it said were his attacks on Israelis.

Maybe Bennet didn’t get the news, but Karmi was actually proud of what Israel “said” were his attacks. He boasted about his activities as recently as last November, telling a Haifa newspaper, “[I have] no pangs of conscience. I killed soldiers and settlers and I'm not afraid to say it.”

Israeli forces said they had tried to kill Mr. Karmi on Sept. 6, in retaliation for what they said were his attacks on Israeli citizens and to pre- empt future attacks.

Every single reference to Karmi’s terrorist activities is qualified like this, even though Karmi himself admitted everything.

They pulverized his sport utility vehicle with rockets fired from helicopters. Two others in the S.U.V. were killed, but Mr. Karmi leaped out and sprinted away just in time, thus burnishing his legend.

Does Bennet have a big sloppy crush on this murderous thug or what?

In an interview that day, Mr. Karmi, bandaged and in hiding, vowed to continue his attacks. "I will continue killing Israeli soldiers and settlers — not civilians," he said. He was making a distinction between Israelis in the West Bank and those on the other side of the border, which Israel erased when it swept into the West Bank in the 1967 war. It is a distinction with no significance to the government, which considered Mr. Karmi a terrorist and said it wanted him jailed.

It’s a distinction with no significance to anyone who thinks people who kidnap and murder civilians are not heroes. Which obviously doesn’t include Mr. Bennet.

Among other attacks, he was wanted for kidnapping and killing two restaurateurs from Tel Aviv who stopped here to dine last January. Mr. Karmi admitted taking part in that attack but insisted that the men were undercover soldiers.

In fact, they were not undercover soldiers. They were well-known restaurant owners. And Karmi himself only started to float the “soldier” story recently. In the initial interviews where he admitted to the murders, he bragged that he fired the first shots himself and said nothing about the men being soldiers. Mr. Bennet must be aware of these facts.

The article then becomes a glowing portrait of Raed al-Karmi, the hero, as remembered by his loving terrorist buddies, who all miss him very much.

In a living room near the spot where their leader died, Mr. Karmi's comrades and friends gathered over cigarettes and tea this afternoon to remember him. The group leafed through an album of photographs of family and men with guns to select a picture for Mr. Karmi's "martyr poster."

“Look...here’s Raed with his RPG! He loved that RPG. Oh hold me, James!”

One friend of Karmi’s fondly remembered him:

The man said that about four days ago, he had told Mr. Karmi, a close friend with whom he served time in Israeli prisons after the first Palestinian uprising, or intifada, that he had missed his chance to become a martyr. "I told him, 'You lost your chance,' " the man recalled saying. " 'There is a cease-fire now.' " Mr. Karmi laughed, he said.

What a carefree Kodak moment!

I don’t know what’s going on at the New York Times; this is a disgracefully slanted, shamefully dishonest article about a person who, if he were American, would be properly called a serial killer.

Here’s the truth about the bloodstained career of this murderous creep, at the Jerusalem Post: Death of a Terrorist.

Advertisement

16 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Robert Crawford  Tue, Jan 15, 2002 9:12:42am

Wait -- if the two restaurant owners were from Tel Aviv, they weren't settlers in the West Bank. Since they were also not soldiers, that means Bennet, um, conveniently missed these two killings that fall outside of the "soldiers and settlers" line.

Or am I missing something?

2 Ben Sheriff  Tue, Jan 15, 2002 9:59:26am

Apart from the obvious point that it's a you-know-who "map" that shows Tel Aviv on that side of the line?

3 gsm  Tue, Jan 15, 2002 10:08:00am

Karmi on the death of the two restauranters in his own words:

"They were allowed to complete their meal, and as they left we abducted them. We drove them outside the city and ordered them out of the car and [to] empty their pockets and pray. As they emptied their pockets, we shot them. I was the first to shoot them."

4 Media Minder  Tue, Jan 15, 2002 10:40:02am

Apparently, a lot of people don't think media bias exists. You've provided proof that it does.

5 Eric  Tue, Jan 15, 2002 10:59:36am

On another note (I agree with Charles' assessment of the article), regardless of the evil of this man, it seems to very poorly timed-- there has been relative calm in recent weeks, and the article does do a good job of showing the immense popularlity of this man. When a popular leaderr is killed, there is a public lust for retribution which is impossible for either side to ignore. No good will come of this assassination in the short term, as satisfying as it might be.

I am talking here from a purely strategic and not emotional level, it should be noted.

6 charles  Tue, Jan 15, 2002 11:09:46am

I disagree, Eric. Karmi was a very active terrorist. Taking him out will obviously help prevent attacks against Israelis -- on a purely pragmatic level.

Yes, he was popular -- for being a very successful and inspirational Jew-killer.

7 Robert Crawford  Tue, Jan 15, 2002 11:48:50am

Apart from the obvious point that it's a you-know-who "map" that shows Tel Aviv on that side of the line?

Good point. I had let myself forget that, to a Palestinian terrorist (and their western media apologists), a "settler" is anyone Jewish living between Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and the Mediterranean.

As for killing him -- he deserved it. As Charles mentioned, this guy qualifies for serial killer status. Killing him may piss people off, but it may also make a point with the less insane.

8 dan truly  Tue, Jan 15, 2002 12:53:58pm

am i wrong or are the "occupied territories" simply what israel had the right to take after whupping ass on the arabs in 1967? (a fight the arabs themselves started by the way).

therefore, why isn't anyone who calls it the "occupied territories" treated with the same scorn that that would be heaped on, for example, any mexican who calls texas, california, etc "occupied territories"?

just wondering...

9 Daniel Jacobson  Tue, Jan 15, 2002 4:36:49pm

It's worse than that, Dan. If you listen closely to the Palesintian politicians who regularly appear on CNN, MSNBC, etc., you'll notice a very interesting little trick. (This is related to something Robert says above, but it's a particularly "nice" use of language.)

"Occupied territories" turns out to be ambiguous. When the US says it, we mean the territory won in the 1967 war -- some of which, as you say, shoud probably be considered the spoils of a war Israel didn't provoke (except by its existence). But when the Palestinians say it, they mean "From the River to the Sea": that would be the Jordan to the Med. Which is to say, all of Israel counts as occupied territory.

10 Robert Crawford  Wed, Jan 16, 2002 5:05:44am

There's a tendency among PLO supporters to say "occupied territories" then mention a time frame of not 39 years, but 50+ years.

11 charles  Wed, Jan 16, 2002 5:57:27am

Most of the Israeli press uses the term "disputed territories." And you guys are right; to the PLO, the entire state of Israel is an "occupied territory."

By the way, after the '67 war, Israel actually occupied the entire Sinai peninsula - and they gave it up, freely, keeping only a security zone in the West Bank and Gaza. Arabs tend to forget just how much land Israel could have taken from them (and kept).

12 Robert Crawford  Wed, Jan 16, 2002 6:34:10am

They also pulled out of Lebanon -- now it's occupied by Syria.

13 Marc  Wed, Jan 16, 2002 10:20:32am

These criticisms are silly. The report is a striaghtforward account of how Palestenians viewed the life and death of Karmi, not how the reporter viewed him. I disagree completely with the criticisms that suggest the reporter was in fact obligated to interject his own views into the report and to make his approbation of Karmi clear. This should be unnecessary for the intelligent reader who can form his or her own opinions. To me, understanding the views and mindset of the Palestenians, no matter how much we may disagree with them, is more valuable than hearing some reporter's opinion on who is a terroist and who is not.

The guy did a decent job of reporting a difficult story, i.e. the view from the other side --something most news outlets don't handle well.

14 CruelLittleMan  Wed, Jan 16, 2002 10:10:36pm

...And wasn't this guy reported by Arafat to be in jail? How then did the Israelis manage to blow him up as a free man?

15 Motownnord  Fri, Jan 18, 2002 7:21:00am

Stories like this make the Palestinian plight all the more sad. When thugs like this are elevated to hero status by ivory tower elitists, you realize that the poor slobs in the refugee camps are doomed. In the long run, Israel has no choice but to systematically wipe out the terror cells, until someone in the Palestinian movement realizes that they have been sold out by the Arab states and that their only hope is a peace deal.

16 Nathan Hall  Fri, Mar 15, 2002 9:37:07pm

The problem is that the palastinians are on the one hand fragmented, and on the other dedicated. They share a relatively common goal: the destruction of Israel. But they have no authority in place that can temper their hatred and respond rationally to developments. Thus, the behavior of the palastinian people as a whole is driven by their religeous hatred, and not by what we Americans tend to take for granted as the motivation behind all human action: self-interest.

No reasonable person or group really has enough sway to broker any sort of peace deal; every time someone tries, some fanatic will pull another suicide stunt, and send us back to square one. That combined with the widespread Arab tendancy to provoke conflict with Israel at any opportunity makes peace a difficult prospect.

This dismal situation is complicated by our acceptance of the PLO as anything other than a terrorist organization, and by our insistance on treating the palastinians as we would treat a society that plays by our rules. It isn't, they're not, and our foreign policy is a disaster.

The integrity (of an unusual sort), dedication, and fortitude displayed by the palastinians as a group is remarkable, and in some ways admirable. Unforunately, they are dedicated to a set of principles that is diametrically opposed to ours. One thing is sure: there are no easy answers.


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

► Top 10 Comments

► Bottom Comments

► Recent Comments

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

Apple iTunes
More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

A bunch of scruffy no-names.


Fast & Free Delivery 160x600
Limited Time Offer:  FREE $10 Online Gift Certificate with $100 Gift Card Purchase!