GOP Politicians Pandering to Nirthers

Weird • Views: 3,378

The insane conspiracy theory called the “Birther movement” is gaining support among Republican politicians. Now there’s actually a bill sponsored by Republicans that panders to these nuts. I hate it when I agree with Chris Matthews, but he’s right on this issue — this madness is embarrassing, self-destructive, and above all mind-bogglingly schtoopid.

And it’s spreading.

Youtube Video

Jump to bottom

266 comments
1 Sharmuta  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 3:56:03pm

Beyond embarrassing.

2 Erik The Red  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 3:57:03pm

Are they all fucking stupid or are they just plain dumb?

3 [deleted]  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 3:58:11pm
4 albusteve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 3:59:36pm

this creepy freakzoid actually represents American voters…chew on that

5 avanti  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 3:59:59pm

Wonderful news if you are a Democrat. It looks like the GOP wants to snatch defeat from the jaws of potential victory in 2010.

6 Erik The Red  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:00:19pm

re: #3 buzzsawmonkey

Between Mathews’ sneering foghorn voice and the Congressman’s weasel body language, the video is truly painful to watch.

I stopped at about 60 seconds.

7 iLikeCandy  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:00:48pm

Can’t remember where I saw it, but some commenter or analyst I read said that Obama is probably enjoying this drama and is deliberately protracting it. At the moment when the birthers have reached the apex of their noise, Obama will calmly pull the document from his pocket and blandly ask, “Is this what you were looking for?”

Thus making complete fools of all Republicans and conservatives, because the entire party and movement will be blamed for it.

8 [deleted]  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:01:38pm
9 Erik The Red  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:01:48pm

re: #7 iLikeCandy

Can’t remember where I saw it, but some commenter or analyst I read said that Obama is probably enjoying this drama and is deliberately protracting it. At the moment when the birthers have reached the apex of their noise, Obama will calmly pull the document from his pocket and blandly ask, “Is this what you were looking for?”

Thus making complete fools of all Republicans and conservatives, because the entire party and movement will be blamed for it.

As much as it kills me to admit it, I agree 100%.

10 albusteve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:03:23pm

re: #7 iLikeCandy

Can’t remember where I saw it, but some commenter or analyst I read said that Obama is probably enjoying this drama and is deliberately protracting it. At the moment when the birthers have reached the apex of their noise, Obama will calmly pull the document from his pocket and blandly ask, “Is this what you were looking for?”

Thus making complete fools of all Republicans and conservatives, because the entire party and movement will be blamed for it.

what is it they would be looking for?…what’s the document?

11 [deleted]  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:03:48pm
12 SFGoth  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:05:07pm

And people panned me when I said that the GOP just could not get its act together by 2012… :-P

13 Shug  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:05:41pm

With the Democrats imploding, only a bunch of Idiots wouldn’t be able to make massive gains in the congress and senate, next elections

oh wait…

damn

14 LGoPs  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:06:19pm

Rather than looking for Obama’s birth certificate, what really needs to be looked at are the SAT scores of all the nimrods that voted for him. That’s where the real answer to the puzzlement behind how he got elected lies.
/

15 Targetpractice  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:06:24pm

How exactly do they think this is going to help them? They’re going to end up losing more people to this insanity than they would have by telling the nirther’s to take a hike. There are other ways to attack Obama than to sign on to this lunacy.

16 BatGuano  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:06:50pm

re: #12 SFGoth

And people panned me when I said that the GOP just could not get its act together by 2012… :-P

They can get their act together but it will require leadership right now: Something were are sorely lacking.

17 albusteve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:06:56pm

if the vast middle ground voters elected BO on such flimsy grounds, I have to wonder how much the troofers will hurt the GOP…if it becomes mainstream then it’s all relative…politics and elections are out of control now

18 Shug  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:07:28pm

bullshit: I want to see the TOTUS’s certificate, date and location of manufacture.
and I want it NOW

something tells me that thing was made in CHINA or JAPAN!

19 IslandLibertarian  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:08:28pm

re: #11 buzzsawmonkey

Matthews is a RACIST!
His liberal white guilt keeps him creaming his jeans for the big “0”(pronounced zero).

/but the Repub’s supporting “birthers” need to be corrected. E-mail, call, voice your displeasure.

20 Erik The Red  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:08:38pm

re: #18 Shug

bullshit: I want to see the TOTUS’s certificate, date and location of manufacture.
and I want it NOW

something tells me that thing was made in CHINA or JAPAN!

Yeah but it was assembled in the USA, thus making it American made.

21 Lincolntf  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:09:44pm

Oh crap. Now Nancy Piehole is claiming that she “has the votes” to make the Health Care Disaster a reality. I really hope Obama isn’t gonna walk on stage tonight and announce that the bill has enough votes to pass.

Hope she’s blowing smoke.

22 Shr_Nfr  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:10:05pm

Again, all I want to see is his Occidental college application. The birth certificate nonsense is like the warming pan of the Glorious Revolution. If he put down American for his citizenship then that settles everything unless he had the bad sense to use his Indonesian passport to go to Pakistan.

23 pingjockey  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:10:48pm

I swear, if it ain’t IDers, YECers, troofers, it’s nirthers on the right. Where in hell did all the idiots come from? It’s bad enough the msm is in the tank for the one, but of course they’re gonna give brain dead fools like this all the air time they want to spout their nonsense for the country to see.

24 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:10:53pm

re: #5 avanti

Wonderful news if you are a Democrat. It looks like the GOP wants to snatch defeat from the jaws of potential victory in 2010.

And terrible news if you are a Democrat, and you voted for Obama, thinking that he could actually deliver on his promises. The Democrats are self-destructing on the healt care bill.

Obama and all the progressives that put so much faith in this guy are getting trashed.

25 Erik The Red  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:11:05pm

re: #21 Lincolntf

Oh crap. Now Nancy Piehole is claiming that she “has the votes” to make the Health Care Disaster a reality. I really hope Obama isn’t gonna walk on stage tonight and announce that the bill has enough votes to pass.

Hope she’s blowing smoke.

There are going to be no more arms to break after this vote.

26 [deleted]  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:11:51pm
27 Sharmuta  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:11:54pm

What is going on, Chris asks.

I’ll tell you Chris. It’s astroturfing from kooks like world net daily, pamella geller, and alex jones. Perhaps it could be stopped if people had faith in the quality of news sources like your network.

28 Lincolntf  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:12:06pm

re: #25 Erik The Red

And no one to put casts on those arms, either.

29 Killgore Trout  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:12:23pm

Also see: Liz Cheney Defends Birthers On Larry King (VIDEO)

I’d have a lot more respect for the GOP if the leadership would speak out against this nonsense. Republicans desperately need to get rid of the nuts. Nobody seems interested in doing it. The base is busy purging the RINOs and moderates.

30 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:12:38pm

re: #21 Lincolntf

Oh crap. Now Nancy Piehole is claiming that she “has the votes” to make the Health Care Disaster a reality. I really hope Obama isn’t gonna walk on stage tonight and announce that the bill has enough votes to pass.

Hope she’s blowing smoke.

Well, it’s possible that she has some Republicans on her side. Hell, the conservatives can’t stick to their guns on anything, example, Sotomayor.

31 Targetpractice  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:12:48pm

re: #21 Lincolntf

Oh crap. Now Nancy Piehole is claiming that she “has the votes” to make the Health Care Disaster a reality. I really hope Obama isn’t gonna walk on stage tonight and announce that the bill has enough votes to pass.

Hope she’s blowing smoke.

Last I checked, she has enough in the House, but the Senate Blue Dogs are still turning Harry every way but loose. If they had the votes in both houses to get this abomination passed, they’d have done so by now.

32 Shug  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:13:32pm

re: #20 Erik The Red

Yeah but it was assembled in the USA, thus making it American made.

sure. that’s what you say…

///

33 [deleted]  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:13:33pm
34 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:13:42pm

re: #29 Killgore Trout

Also see: Liz Cheney Defends Birthers On Larry King (VIDEO)

I’d have a lot more respect for the GOP if the leadership would speak out against this nonsense.

I bet…

35 avanti  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:13:45pm

re: #24 Walter L. Newton

And terrible news if you are a Democrat, and you voted for Obama, thinking that he could actually deliver on his promises. The Democrats are self-destructing on the healt care bill.

Obama and all the progressives that put so much faith in this guy are getting trashed.

Walter, it’s not over til the fat lady sings and if fails, it won’t be for lack of trying.

36 MJ  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:14:01pm

Todays New York Times has a piece on this “movement”

‘Birther’ Boom

[Link: opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com…]

Worth the read.

37 reine.de.tout  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:14:23pm

re: #23 pingjockey

I swear, if it ain’t IDers, YECers, troofers, it’s nirthers on the right. Where in hell did all the idiots come from? It’s bad enough the msm is in the tank for the one, but of course they’re gonna give brain dead fools like this all the air time they want to spout their nonsense for the country to see.

re: #27 Sharmuta

What is going on, Chris asks.

I’ll tell you Chris. It’s astroturfing from kooks like world net daily, pamella geller, and alex jones. Perhaps it could be stopped if people had faith in the quality of news sources like your network.

Unfortunately, it seems to me that what else is going on is all the right-wing nuts are jockeying for position within the Rep party, trying to be the one whose position ends up on top.

What I want to know is where, oh where, are rational leaders for the GOP? Where are they? Why are they hiding? Or do they simply not exist?

38 Lincolntf  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:14:28pm

re: #30 Walter L. Newton

She may have Republicans on her side, wouldn’t surprise me a bit if a few went over to the D-side. There are (almost) always a few.

39 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:14:35pm

re: #24 Walter L. Newton

And terrible news if you are a Democrat, and you voted for Obama, thinking that he could actually deliver on his promises. The Democrats are self-destructing on the healt care bill.

Obama and all the progressives that put so much faith in this guy are getting trashed.

re: #30 Walter L. Newton

Well, it’s possible that she has some Republicans on her side. Hell, the conservatives can’t stick to their guns on anything, example, Sotomayor.

And looking at all the issues, and all the idiots in Washington, bottom line is you can’t trust any of them.

40 The Shadow Do  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:14:36pm

Never thought I would be cheering on Chris Mathews.

The stupid Pubs, my party, do indeed need a smaller tent. Nirthers, Nazis, Religio-zealots and other undesirables need not apply.

41 tokyobk  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:14:50pm

What do these people say about the Newspaper birth announcement?

What do moon landing conspiracists say about the recent hubble photos that show traces of the event?

42 Killgore Trout  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:14:55pm

A video montage of Nirthers from the KosKidz…
The Birthers — Conservative Media Feed “The Wacko Wing”

43 pingjockey  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:14:58pm

re: #27 Sharmuta

Hey Sharm could you give me a definition of astroturfing? Please. That little term seems to have passed me by!

44 Shug  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:15:02pm

re: #24 Walter L. Newton

And terrible news if you are a Democrat, and you voted for Obama, thinking that he could actually deliver on his promises. The Democrats are self-destructing on the healt care bill.

Obama and all the progressives that put so much faith in this guy are getting trashed.


and if their only hopes for survival hang on a bunch of fucking nirthers, they are hosed.

hopefully the nirther, birther, bircher, truther, etc..er fringe stays that : a fringe

45 [deleted]  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:15:19pm
46 Lincolntf  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:15:22pm

re: #31 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

As I understand it, it’s the 50 or so B-D’s in the House that are preventing the steamroller from reaching the Senate.

47 hous bin pharteen  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:15:29pm

The GOP should copy the Dem’s. With their history of criminals and nut cases in office, why should the GOP not get a turn. From Obama, to the sex crime Pres (Clinton) all the way to a mob boss son (Kennedy) [Link: www.britannica.com…] who got rich in Prohibition and funky dealing’s on Wall Street). Say it isn’t so! They want Nirthers when they can have greedy nuts!

48 Sharmuta  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:15:45pm

re: #37 reine.de.tout

Unfortunately, it seems to me that what else is going on is all the right-wing nuts are jockeying for position within the Rep party, trying to be the one whose position ends up on top.

What I want to know is where, oh where, are rational leaders for the GOP? Where are they? Why are they hiding? Or do they simply not exist?

I doubt the existence of rational GOP leadership at this time.

49 steve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:16:04pm

re: #18 Shug

bullshit: I want to see the TOTUS’s certificate, date and location of manufacture.
and I want it NOW

something tells me that thing was made in CHINA or JAPAN!

I’m voting for North Korea

50 iLikeCandy  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:16:05pm

re: #15 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

How exactly do they think this is going to help them? They’re going to end up losing more people to this insanity than they would have by telling the nirther’s to take a hike. There are other ways to attack Obama than to sign on to this lunacy.

Yes. It looks as though Republicans/conservatives have no better grounds on which to oppose Obama than some silly conspiracy theory.

51 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:16:06pm

re: #38 Lincolntf

She may have Republicans on her side, wouldn’t surprise me a bit if a few went over to the D-side. There are (almost) always a few.

I don’t want to say who it may be, for for example, but his initials are John McCain

52 latingent  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:16:09pm

Two useless idiots talking about a dead issue. I wonder how Chrissies leg is after all that tingling.

53 avanti  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:16:09pm

re: #41 tokyobk

What do these people say about the Newspaper birth announcement?

What do moon landing conspiracists say about the recent hubble photos that show traces of the event?

Fake, fake, and fake. /s

54 albusteve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:16:18pm

re: #29 Killgore Trout

Also see: Liz Cheney Defends Birthers On Larry King (VIDEO)

I’d have a lot more respect for the GOP if the leadership would speak out against this nonsense. Republicans desperately need to get rid of the nuts. Nobody seems interested in doing it. The base is busy purging the RINOs and moderates.

BO is his own birth cert…he got elected…I’m not a cert denier but I think you overestimate the damage these people will do…just an observation

55 pingjockey  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:16:23pm

re: #37 reine.de.tout
I have no fucking idea and wish I did.

56 Sharmuta  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:16:51pm

re: #43 pingjockey

Hey Sharm could you give me a definition of astroturfing? Please. That little term seems to have passed me by!

[Link: en.wikipedia.org…]

57 avanti  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:17:01pm

re: #51 Walter L. Newton

I don’t want to say who it may be, for for example, but his initials are John McCain

Walter, McCain is strongly in opposition so far.

58 Targetpractice  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:17:07pm

re: #46 Lincolntf

As I understand it, it’s the 50 or so B-D’s in the House that are preventing the steamroller from reaching the Senate.

Like I said, if Nancy had the votes, she wouldn’t wait for the translation, she’d hold the vote now. She’s bluffing.

59 [deleted]  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:17:43pm
60 Eyes of Blue  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:17:53pm

re: #18 Shug

bullshit: I want to see the TOTUS’s certificate, date and location of manufacture.
and I want it NOW

something tells me that thing was made in CHINA or JAPAN!

I thought it broke once already. That means it was made in China.

61 kpom  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:17:54pm

Hah! You think it was easy for the Obamabots to plant a birth announcement in the Honolulu paper when The One was really being born in Indonesia, Kenya, or wherever he was born! Even then, they knew that He would become all-powerful!!!

BWWWAAAHAHA!!! You have no idea how powerful we are, Earthlings!

62 The Shadow Do  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:17:54pm

re: #48 Sharmuta

I doubt the existence of rational GOP leadership at this time.

I find Palin rational, however she has the misfortune of being a woman and stupid…
/

63 Lincolntf  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:18:02pm

re: #44 Shug

The Dems flogged the “National Guard documents” forever and it never came to be identified with the Party as a whole. Obviously, the Repubs don’t get that kind of a free pass, but I’d still guess that 90% of voters don’t know/care about the Birth Cert. thing either way.

64 albusteve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:18:11pm

re: #39 Walter L. Newton

And looking at all the issues, and all the idiots in Washington, bottom line is you can’t trust any of them.

exactly…who knows what is politically damaging and what is not…since 08 I sure don’t presume to know, and I wonder how anybody else can…it’s all blather imo

65 [deleted]  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:18:18pm
66 notamolly  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:18:24pm

re: #21 Lincolntf

Oh crap. Now Nancy Piehole is claiming that she “has the votes” to make the Health Care Disaster a reality. I really hope Obama isn’t gonna walk on stage tonight and announce that the bill has enough votes to pass.

Hope she’s blowing smoke.

The Mengele Care Bill? I think making anyone over 55 justify their existence to some scumbag bureaucrat and an amnio then mandatory abortions should scare the shit out of any thinking human.

67 iLikeCandy  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:18:26pm

re: #29 Killgore Trout

Also see: Liz Cheney Defends Birthers On Larry King (VIDEO)

I’d have a lot more respect for the GOP if the leadership would speak out against this nonsense. Republicans desperately need to get rid of the nuts. Nobody seems interested in doing it. The base is busy purging the RINOs and moderates.

I read the article. The title is bullshit. She did no such thing.

68 avanti  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:18:44pm

re: #58 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

Like I said, if Nancy had the votes, she wouldn’t wait for the translation, she’d hold the vote now. She’s bluffing.

The house wants the Senate to act first, after the bills are reconciled.

69 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:19:12pm

re: #57 avanti

Walter, McCain is strongly in opposition so far.

It was a joke (why do I have to explain it to you?)

70 pingjockey  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:19:18pm

re: #56 Sharmuta
Thank you dear.

71 Targetpractice  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:19:38pm

re: #68 avanti

The house wants the Senate to act first, after the bills are reconciled.

Hot potato! HOT POTATO!

72 Dad O' Blondes  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:19:51pm

Well, I guess I’ll just have to be a “Dumb-publican” for the next few years until the fools go awy.

Ronald Reagan, where are you?

.

73 chukardog  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:19:56pm

its beyond pathetic

74 avanti  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:19:57pm

re: #69 Walter L. Newton

It was a joke (why do I have to explain it to you?)

Because I love your thoughtful prose.

75 Yashmak  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:20:20pm

re: #7 iLikeCandy

That’s what I’d do if I were him… I’d wait until it came to my desk for veto, and slap it down on top of the bill. I might even ask, in a sarcastic tone, “Don’t you guys have the internet? It’s been posted there, complete with close-up photos of the impression stamps, for months.”

76 Sharmuta  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:20:39pm

Hope that helped, ping.

77 tokyobk  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:21:56pm

re: #53 avanti

I mean that is just nuts. I think politicians hide embarrassing things all the time and hide their true intentions and ambitions and certainly cover up past blemishes or things that would be perceived as blemishes. And they certainly let all the little facts of their lives add up to the inevitability of their ascendance.

I just read a profile of a politician with whom I was friends long ago and it is filled with all sorts of overarching life story narrative — from log cabin to great heights stuff— that sorta loosely kinda fits the actual kid I used to know.

Maybe one of the documents that are not released have “Muslim” as his religion or at the time misidentified him as being Kenyan or Indonesian, but for God’s sake, do people think he got into a time machine and had a newspaper birth announcement printed in a Hawaiian newspaper.

Nuts.

Really, a pox on both houses is all I can think these days because the republican party is pandering to nutty fringes.

78 placeholder  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:21:58pm

I can’t help but wonder what exactly these guys hope to achieve… Does Alan Keyes really think he will be successful unseating a legitimately elected president of the United States through this completely irrelevant bs? Is this really useful? Unreal…

How about just voting him out like the system was set up to work…

My pet peeve is how everyone in the nutball league always DEMANDS something. We DEMAND the birth certificate! we DEMAND the university records…we DEMAND to be taken seriously.

They all seem to miss the point that just because you demand something, doesn’t mean anyone has to listen. I demand not to have anything demanded of me. I couldn’t give less of a shit about what someone is “demanding…”

-PH

79 Buster  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:22:51pm

With so many good and true arguments on their side with regard to Health care, the economy, energy independence, etc.; why must the GOP sidetrack itself with nirthers and creationists? The MSM loves this! They will cover this circus all day and the the GOP’s credibility on any and all serious topics will be tarnished… As if their free spending years in the majority didn’t do it already!

80 nordink  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:23:17pm

I’ve heard Congressman Campbell on the radio, and he seemed both affable and — yes — intelligent.

However, in this interview … yikes. I believe the technical term is: *pwned.*

Sad.

81 placeholder  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:23:23pm

re: #53 avanti

Fake, fake, and fake. /s

The only way they will be convinced is if we send them to the moon to see it for themselves.

82 windhorse  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:24:37pm

how creative and forward thinking the GOP appears…

/

83 flutesnoot  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:24:52pm

Uh, aren’t there bureaucrats in some department in your government that makes sure or demands proof that anyone running for president was born in the USA?

84 SasquatchOnSteroids  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:25:14pm

(facepalm)

They’ve
Lost
Their
Fucking
Minds

85 albusteve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:25:43pm

re: #29 Killgore Trout

Also see: Liz Cheney Defends Birthers On Larry King (VIDEO)

I’d have a lot more respect for the GOP if the leadership would speak out against this nonsense. Republicans desperately need to get rid of the nuts. Nobody seems interested in doing it. The base is busy purging the RINOs and moderates.

bullshit Killgore…and you know it…you are better than that

86 Randall Gross  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:25:44pm

We get back power in this environment only if the US public sees us as adult. These fucking loons are making that impossible.

87 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:26:18pm

re: #67 iLikeCandy

I read the article. The title is bullshit. She did no such thing.

Looked like it to me.

88 avanti  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:26:50pm

re: #81 placeholder

The only way they will be convinced is if we send them to the moon to see it for themselves.

Nope, they’d claim we drugged and hypnotized them.

89 HoosierHoops  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:26:58pm

re: #83 flutesnoot

Uh, aren’t there bureaucrats in some department in your government that makes sure or demands proof that anyone running for president was born in the USA?

Yea, we got em.. They were all on leave that week…When you work for the Gov’t there is always that use or lose issue…
/
What part of the world do you hail from lizard?

90 Eyes of Blue  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:27:00pm

Hmmm. My husband just showed me something he just received in the mail.A chance to win a pre-paid cremation. Yes, you read that right. My husband said, “That will be the thing I win. ” I said, Are they going to wait for you to be dead? This is california you know.”

91 albusteve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:27:25pm

re: #87 Charles

Looked like it to me.

she was trying to explain their frustration, hardly an endorsement…that’s knee jerk right there

92 itellu3times  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:27:34pm

We don’t need no stinkin’ nirth cirtifikats.

There are no illegal aliens, there are no unborn presidents.

93 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:27:36pm

re: #85 albusteve

bullshit Killgore…and you know it…you are better than that

I don’t think it’s “bullshit” at all. Liz Cheney weaseled around and refused to outright denounce the crazies. She was very clearly pandering to the wacko wing.

94 tokyobk  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:27:44pm

I felt bad for the republican because he didn’t even know the standard retort, that it is a record of live birth. I think these people are nuts and even i know that.

95 Yashmak  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:27:56pm

I don’t really think Alan Keyes and the like CARE what effect their nonsense has on conservatives. As long as he can whip up followers, he can remain relevant, sell books, go on the the talk show circuit.

Like Michael Moore is a leech on the backside of the liberals, these folks are leeches on the conservative portion of our society.

96 Erik The Red  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:28:21pm

re: #69 Walter L. Newton

It was a joke (why do I have to explain it to you?)

Why are you still engaging with him Walter. Btw how was your Lost meeting?

97 Lincolntf  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:29:08pm

re: #67 iLikeCandy

Yeah, but there is a link with blue letters and everything, so it has to be the truth!

98 hous bin pharteen  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:29:23pm

re: #21 Lincolntf

Like the health care ideas worked so well all over the world. We should try it here!

Q: Not being rich, but having the hospital emergency helo take me to the emergency room, how long do I have to wait for the next helo ride? One week? A month? Or are they going to be taken away for not having enough insurance coverage?

99 Randall Gross  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:31:10pm

re: #91 albusteve

she was trying to explain their frustration, hardly an endorsement…that’s knee jerk right there

If an islamist in CAIR were saying something like this “however” statement of Liz Cheney’s you’d be all over it like flies on shit. Why do you accept the fence-sitting “cake and eat it too” stance here? Nirthers are fucking loons who are sapping from our electorate and they need to be smacked down unequivocally whenever and wherever they stick their slimey heads up.

100 dwells38  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:31:34pm

re: #78 placeholder

I can’t help but wonder what exactly these guys hope to achieve… Does Alan Keyes really think he will be successful unseating a legitimately elected president of the United States through this completely irrelevant bs? Is this really useful? Unreal…

How about just voting him out like the system was set up to work…

With Keyes I’m thinking this must be personal. Because he’s too smart to actually think this is a winner of a cause.

He ran against Obama for the Illinois senate in ‘04. I’m guessing some nasty politics were used and Alan’s in vendetta mode.

A quick Google on Keyes and Obama shows several articles quoting Keyes as saying in no uncertain terms that Obama will destroy the U.S. So obviously he wants Obama out pronto even if it’s purely on a technicality.

101 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:31:46pm

re: #96 Erik The Red

Why are you still engaging with him Walter. Btw how was your Lost meeting?

What LOST meeting? This morning I mentioned that this years Comic-Con will be this coming weekend, and LOST we be having a number of symposiums with the producers and a few of the actors. I also mention that I would pass on any non-spoiler information about season six when I get it. But I’m not attending, just offering to pass on info here on LGF when I get it.

Stay tuned.

102 Erik The Red  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:33:17pm

re: #101 Walter L. Newton

What LOST meeting? This morning I mentioned that this years Comic-Con will be this coming weekend, and LOST we be having a number of symposiums with the producers and a few of the actors. I also mention that I would pass on any non-spoiler information about season six when I get it. But I’m not attending, just offering to pass on info here on LGF when I get it.

Stay tuned.

Shit was that only this am? Damn sleep deprivation.

103 pianobuff  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:33:42pm

re: #29 Killgore Trout

Also see: Liz Cheney Defends Birthers On Larry King (VIDEO)

I’d have a lot more respect for the GOP if the leadership would speak out against this nonsense. Republicans desperately need to get rid of the nuts. Nobody seems interested in doing it. The base is busy purging the RINOs and moderates.

So now Liz Cheney is a nirther too? Oh crap.

104 keithgabryelski  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:34:01pm

re: #41 tokyobk


What do moon landing conspiracists say about the recent hubble photos that show traces of the event?

Hubble can’t see the traces of the moon landing: [Link: science.nasa.gov…]

It was a probe that took those pictures: [Link: www.newscientist.com…]

btw, the math on what is needed to see these objects from a given distance is interesting (i typed this for another discussion):

Here is an explanation of blurring and the formula for how large a lens has to be to see something on moon from earth

Physics 10: Physics for Future Presidents


at about 1:08:00 the professor talks about blurring.
This is an online course on physics that is pretty accessible to most people (by president he means President of a company as well as president of country). Any math is either not required to understand the concepts or is worked out on the board.

He goes over time dilation (as well as a host of other concepts) — and for those that actually care, he actually works out Einstein’s equations on the board in one of the later classes)

but here is the math

Blurring:
B = (L/D)R

B = size of thing you want to see (in meters)
L = wavelength of light (in meters) .0000005
D = diameter of lens (in meters)
R = distance away (in meters)

so, let’s say you have a lens that is 1kilometer in diameter (much larger than anything we have right now)

distance of moon
R = 384403000 (meters)

size of lens
D = 1000

B = (.0000005/1000) * 384403000

Blurring = 0.1922015

With a lens of diameter 1 kilometer you can see something on the surface of the moon that is over 1/5th of a meter (a little over 1/2 a foot) in size

105 albusteve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:34:10pm

re: #93 Charles

I don’t think it’s “bullshit” at all. Liz Cheney weaseled around and refused to outright denounce the crazies. She was very clearly pandering to the wacko wing.

well I wish she had…and if she is pandering it’s for good reason..these are the very people that will vote out democrats next year…if they are troofers so be it…I still don’t know how much they will hurt the GOP, just like the creationists…it boils down to who you associate with vrs their voting value…I don’t like any of it…I just ask the questions…can you preserve the GOP and still defeat the donks?

106 Lincolntf  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:34:12pm

re: #99 Thanos

I really doubt that. Also, when people oppose “Islamists from CAIR”, it’s because they fund and arm people who murder Americans.
Even if Cheney was “defending” Birth Certificate nuts, all they want is a piece of paper. There is no comparison.

107 calcajun  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:34:39pm

Oh horrors — our President is an alien!?

108 pingjockey  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:34:47pm

re: #76 Sharmuta
Yepper. Don’t know how I missed that one?!

109 Killgore Trout  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:35:39pm

re: #85 albusteve

“Outrage! Lies! Slander!”
/Yeah, I know the routine

110 formercorpsman  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:35:39pm

What a great time to take the spotlight off of the biggest spending bill in history.

Banging my head against the wall.

111 HoosierHoops  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:35:50pm

re: #104 keithgabryelski

Sweet post!

112 calcajun  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:36:10pm

re: #84 SasquatchOnSteroids

(facepalm)

They’ve
Lost
Their
Fucking
Minds

No.
They
Don’t
Know
What
They’re
Talking
About

Ignorance is really not bliss.

113 iLikeCandy  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:36:57pm

re: #93 Charles

I don’t think it’s “bullshit” at all. Liz Cheney weaseled around and refused to outright denounce the crazies. She was very clearly pandering to the wacko wing.

Please, a moment of sobriety. Liz clearly had no desire to even address this bullshit and she kept trying to steer the conversation to the real issues. She wouldn’t condescend to touch the birthers. It would be like asking Julia Child to endorse a non-dairy whipped topping.

That conservatives would attack Liz Cheney, one of the most hard-headed, clear-eyed, and articulate spokespersons of conservative causes over the nirth certifikat issue, has handed a measure of success to the forces of idiocy.

114 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:36:59pm

re: #105 albusteve

well I wish she had…and if she is pandering it’s for good reason..these are the very people that will vote out democrats next year…if they are troofers so be it…I still don’t know how much they will hurt the GOP, just like the creationists…it boils down to who you associate with vrs their voting value…I don’t like any of it…I just ask the questions…can you preserve the GOP and still defeat the donks?

Settle down Steve. You are seething and raging. And while you are at it, stop squabbling.

115 iLikeCandy  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:37:22pm

re: #103 pianobuff

So now Liz Cheney is a nirther too? Oh crap.

NO! Read the article. The title is bullshit.

116 albusteve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:37:34pm

re: #99 Thanos

If an islamist in CAIR were saying something like this “however” statement of Liz Cheney’s you’d be all over it like flies on shit. Why do you accept the fence-sitting “cake and eat it too” stance here? Nirthers are fucking loons who are sapping from our electorate and they need to be smacked down unequivocally whenever and wherever they stick their slimey heads up.

I know they are loons, but they are valuable loons as voters…if the GOP rejects all the fringe lunatics they will never win another election…there are not enough Goldwater conservatives to carry the day…I’m just asking where yo draw the line…nobody is more disgusted with the GOP than me…I’m looking to win back the House

117 Erik The Red  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:37:37pm

re: #111 HoosierHoops

Sweet post!

It sure was. I did not understand one damn thing but it sure sounded great :)

118 iLikeCandy  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:38:44pm

re: #97 Lincolntf

Yeah, but there is a link with blue letters and everything, so it has to be the truth!

Heehee! Bloo letterz!

119 albusteve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:38:58pm

re: #109 Killgore Trout

“Outrage! Lies! Slander!”
/Yeah, I know the routine

I don’t see her as endorsing the troofers…others do

120 itellu3times  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:39:24pm

re: #104 keithgabryelski

With a lens of diameter 1 kilometer you can see something on the surface of the moon that is over 1/5th of a meter (a little over 1/2 a foot) in size

Optical interferometry, two one-meter mirrors a kilometer apart, should do it!

121 Randall Gross  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:39:28pm

re: #105 albusteve

well I wish she had…and if she is pandering it’s for good reason..these are the very people that will vote out democrats next year…if they are troofers so be it…I still don’t know how much they will hurt the GOP, just like the creationists…it boils down to who you associate with vrs their voting value…I don’t like any of it…I just ask the questions…can you preserve the GOP and still defeat the donks?

These are mostly rural people who are locked in and will vote R regardless. They don’t need to be pandered to with rancid fake food substance that they are told is red meat when there’s real red meat out there. They need the truth, and part of the truth is that we must win back suburban and urban voters. Nirthing at the mouth isn’t going to get those votes back, it’s going to ensure we lose next election, and stay in the minority in congress.

122 Ojoe  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:39:48pm

The Republicans are shooting themselves in the foot.

The Democrats are pandering also.

Dump them both.

Time for a new party, and here’s one to look at: centrist & historic & new at the same time…

The Modern Whig Party.

I joined.

123 Randall Gross  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:40:37pm

re: #116 albusteve

I know they are loons, but they are valuable loons as voters…if the GOP rejects all the fringe lunatics they will never win another election…there are not enough Goldwater conservatives to carry the day…I’m just asking where yo draw the line…nobody is more disgusted with the GOP than me…I’m looking to win back the House

Wrong. As long as the media can put them forward as “Republicans” we lose the very votes we need to regain the majority. If you want to stay irrelevant, keep thinking this way.

124 Sharmuta  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:40:39pm

re: #116 albusteve

I know they are loons, but they are valuable loons as voters…if the GOP rejects all the fringe lunatics they will never win another election…there are not enough Goldwater conservatives to carry the day…I’m just asking where yo draw the line…nobody is more disgusted with the GOP than me…I’m looking to win back the House

NONSENSE! For every fringe loon we try to keep we push away more than one moderate/independent. The fringe is a minority by definition. They hurt us.

125 steve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:40:50pm

OT I know but I just got spammed by the white house.



Dear Friend,

As you read this, we are closer than ever to passing comprehensive health insurance reform that benefits American families and small businesses. Despite all the back and forth in the news right now, it is important to understand just how far we’ve come in this challenging process.

That’s why I’m holding a press conference tonight at 8pm ET, and writing to let everyone know where we are, what’s ahead, and why health insurance reform is so important.

Let me be clear: although Congress is still debating parts of the legislation we have achieved critical consensus on several key areas:


If you already have health insurance: reform will provide you with more security and stability. It will limit your own out of pocket costs and prevent your insurance company from dropping your coverage if you get too sick. You’ll also have affordable insurance options if you lose or change your job. And it will cover preventive care like check-ups and mammograms that save lives and money.

If you don’t have health insurance: you will finally have guaranteed access to quality, affordable health care, and you can choose the plan that best suits your family’s needs. And no insurance company will be allowed to deny you coverage because of a pre-existing medical condition.


Now, I realize that the last few miles of any race are the hardest to run, but we can’t stop now. There’s no dispute about it: we cannot control our long-term fiscal health as a nation without health insurance reform. American families and small businesses understand that the health insurance status quo is taking away those things that they value most about health care. The stability and security that comes with knowing that you can get the treatment you need, when you need it. Without reform, we are consigning our children to a future of skyrocketing premiums and crushing deficits.

We have to seize this opportunity and pass health insurance reform this year. You can help by forwarding this email to your family and friends and letting them know what’s at stake in this debate.

Thank you,
Barack Obama

P.S. Tune in to tonight’s press conference on health insurance reform at 8pm ET on WhiteHouse.gov.


This email was sent to meggsstephen@msn.com
Unsubscribe %P% Privacy Policy
Please do not reply to this email. Contact the White House

The White House · 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW · Washington, DC 20500 ·[no phone numbers allowed]


126 pianobuff  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:41:14pm

re: #115 iLikeCandy

NO! Read the article. The title is bullshit.

OK. I read the article. My heart kind of sunk for a minute because I thought she was coming out pro-nirth. I see it’s just a classic deflection like any politician does when they want to move from a position when they are on the defensive to one of offense.

Whether she should denounce nirthers is another question, but she’s clearly not advocating a pro-nirth position in this article.

127 Targetpractice  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:41:41pm

re: #116 albusteve

I know they are loons, but they are valuable loons as voters…if the GOP rejects all the fringe lunatics they will never win another election…there are not enough Goldwater conservatives to carry the day…I’m just asking where yo draw the line…nobody is more disgusted with the GOP than me…I’m looking to win back the House

Except there’s not enough loonies to make up for all the moderate voters we’re going to lose in the process. The base isn’t going anywhere, but the moderates are not willing to rub shoulders with people who think the Earth was formed 6,000 years ago or that Obama’s hiding his real birth certificate.

This “You gotta take support where you can get it” policy is not the future of the party, it’s the means to insure another 30 year Dem majority.

128 BatGuano  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:42:12pm

re: #122 Ojoe

/If I joined would I actually have to were a whig?

129 formercorpsman  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:42:17pm

re: #121 Thanos

I’m with you. Furiously ridiculous issue to waste any time on. It provides nothing of substance, it certainly does not enhance any type of leadership quality for the party, and diverts energy from real issues that do affect me.

130 Lincolntf  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:42:58pm

re: #125 steve

Amazing how he can summarixe a 1,000 page document (major parts of which he claims to have never read) in a few paragraphs.
He really is a genius!

131 iLikeCandy  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:42:59pm

re: #126 pianobuff

OK. I read the article. My heart kind of sunk for a minute because I thought she was coming out pro-nirth. I see it’s just a classic deflection like any politician does when they want to move from a position when they are on the defensive to one of offense.

Whether she should denounce nirthers is another question, but she’s clearly not advocating a pro-nirth position in this article.

Thank you. My reading of her comments is that — well, it’s here: [Link: littlegreenfootballs.com…]

132 keithgabryelski  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:43:09pm

re: #120 itellu3times

Optical interferometry, two one-meter mirrors a kilometer apart, should do it!

I’m not sure of all the requirements for doing that (although I am aware of the subject).

My post neglects to mention there is atmospheric disturbances that decrease the effectiveness of any ground base telescope.

133 HoosierHoops  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:43:22pm

re: #116 albusteve

I know they are loons, but they are valuable loons as voters…if the GOP rejects all the fringe lunatics they will never win another election…there are not enough Goldwater conservatives to carry the day…I’m just asking where yo draw the line…nobody is more disgusted with the GOP than me…I’m looking to win back the House


Steve…no fringe element has ever won an American Election…The moderates and indy’s always carry the day…
remember Clinton and the soccer moms? Nixon and the Silent Majority?
The moderates have far more influence in elections than any fringe element…
Obama won over the moderates last year…My Dad voted for Obama..
If he loses the center he loses the next election..

134 Randall Gross  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:43:25pm

Republicans are headed to becoming the pup-tent party on the crazy farm.

135 albusteve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:43:45pm

re: #121 Thanos

These are mostly rural people who are locked in and will vote R regardless. They don’t need to be pandered to with rancid fake food substance that they are told is red meat when there’s real red meat out there. They need the truth, and part of the truth is that we must win back suburban and urban voters. Nirthing at the mouth isn’t going to get those votes back, it’s going to ensure we lose next election, and stay in the minority in congress.

I love that one…anyway what do I care for?…I’m skating to Jamaica…actually I hope you are right but I do not see common sense rescuing the GOP any time soon…in the meantime the lunatics will rule the party

136 steve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:43:50pm

re: #130 Lincolntf

Amazing how he can summarixe a 1,000 page document (major parts of which he claims to have never read) in a few paragraphs.
He really is a genius!

Yeah, a genius in his own mind.

137 Lincolntf  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:44:00pm

re: #133 HoosierHoops

“Steve…no fringe element has ever won an American Election..”

Tell it to Acorn.

138 Ojoe  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:44:16pm

re: #128 BatGuano

All with hair, their own or not, can join.

/

139 placeholder  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:44:48pm

re: #95 Yashmak

I don’t really think Alan Keyes and the like CARE what effect their nonsense has on conservatives. As long as he can whip up followers, he can remain relevant, sell books, go on the the talk show circuit.

Like Michael Moore is a leech on the backside of the liberals, these folks are leeches on the conservative portion of our society.

You don’t see MM interviewed on mainstream tv as a “political” figure very often. Not so for Keyes, or this schmuck in the video above. Big difference… for some reason, folks even remotely associated with the “right” or conservative movement - or who self-identify that way, are often given legitimacy as spokesmen.

Wackjobs further exacerbate this by claiming they are being attacked by the “left” because of their beliefs - the implication being that by default they are on the “right.” Instead of strongly and forcefully shoving them back into the middle of homeless crackpots, we - for reasons that are completely lost to me - instead treat them like basement children, there to be humored and then shushed. Because who knows - they can be helpful down the road.

The reality is they can’t be. They aren’t helpful. They are harmful. We don’t need nirthirs, or creationists, or any other idiot in this party to be competitive. When will we find are effin nuts already??

-PH

140 Randall Gross  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:45:12pm

re: #135 albusteve

I love that one…anyway what do I care for?…I’m skating to Jamaica…actually I hope you are right but I do not see common sense rescuing the GOP any time soon…in the meantime the lunatics will rule the party

If they’re still running the party after 2010, then I’m out after a lifetime of voting solid R. It’s that serious.

141 JacksonTn  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:45:31pm

re: #121 Thanos

These are mostly rural people who are locked in and will vote R regardless. They don’t need to be pandered to with rancid fake food substance that they are told is red meat when there’s real red meat out there. They need the truth, and part of the truth is that we must win back suburban and urban voters. Nirthing at the mouth isn’t going to get those votes back, it’s going to ensure we lose next election, and stay in the minority in congress.

Thanos … I doubt the majority of people who filed lawsuits and/or originally pushed this issue were rural voters … there are many rural voters who vote republican but I don’t think you can say that they are more likely to believe this any more than a person living in the city … tinfoil issues strike all areas …

142 Flyers1974  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:46:00pm

re: #116 albusteve

I know they are loons, but they are valuable loons as voters…if the GOP rejects all the fringe lunatics they will never win another election…there are not enough Goldwater conservatives to carry the day…I’m just asking where yo draw the line…nobody is more disgusted with the GOP than me…I’m looking to win back the House

Pretty good analysis. Unless they are rejected and vote GOP anyway for lack of anywhere else to go, as someone said the other day here.

143 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:46:12pm

re: #124 Sharmuta

NONSENSE! For every fringe loon we try to keep we push away more than one moderate/independent. The fringe is a minority by definition. They hurt us.

I have a question. What would you do if these nirthers actually prove their point? Prove it with no wiggle room for any other conclusion. Just play what if with me. What would you do?

144 lefort3  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:46:24pm

It may be just me but geez, aren’t there more pressing issues with the sitting president and our pathetic congress? Call me crazy but…

145 Randall Gross  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:46:33pm

re: #141 JacksonTn

Thanos … I doubt the majority of people who filed lawsuits and/or originally pushed this issue were rural voters … there are many rural voters who vote republican but I don’t think you can say that they are more likely to believe this any more than a person living in the city … tinfoil issues strike all areas …

Umm. Look at the Red blue map by county and then get back to me.

146 Noam Sayin'  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:46:38pm

What if the Middle stayed home on election night?

147 Cheechako  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:46:46pm

What’s the betting line on whether or not any MSM asks Obama if he’s read the entire health care bill?

148 placeholder  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:46:46pm

re: #105 albusteve

well I wish she had…and if she is pandering it’s for good reason..these are the very people that will vote out democrats next year…if they are troofers so be it…I still don’t know how much they will hurt the GOP, just like the creationists…it boils down to who you associate with vrs their voting value…I don’t like any of it…I just ask the questions…can you preserve the GOP and still defeat the donks?

the enemy of my enemy is my friend eh? not a good political theory long term - because you can only swim in shit for so long without stinking of it.

149 JacksonTn  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:47:33pm

re: #145 Thanos

Umm. Look at the Red blue map by county and then get back to me.

Thanos … I am not talking about republican voters … I am addressing you saying that it is mostly rural people who believe the nirthers … I do not believe that is true …

150 The Shadow Do  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:47:42pm

re: #122 Ojoe

The Republicans are shooting themselves in the foot.

The Democrats are pandering also.

Dump them both.

Time for a new party, and here’s one to look at: centrist & historic & new at the same time…

The Modern Whig Party.

I joined.

Site of National convention: corner booth at Denny’s

151 el_raton  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:47:45pm

It’s obvious that the media’s juxtaposition of nirthers and critics of BHO’s health care plan (for example) is meant to draw an equivalency between the two groups or, at the very least, between the validity of the two arguments.

152 HoosierHoops  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:48:00pm

re: #137 Lincolntf

“Steve…no fringe element has ever won an American Election..”

Tell it to Acorn.

You understand what I am saying though right? The middle holds sway over elections generally…/ACORN.Shit… There will probably be ACORN Moms next election…*wink*

153 Ojoe  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:48:42pm

re: #150 The Shadow Do

If the Denny’s type voters got together they would be a big group.

154 Randall Gross  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:49:01pm

re: #149 JacksonTn

Thanos … I am not talking about republican voters … I am addressing you saying that it is mostly rural people who believe the nirthers … I do not believe that is true …

From my anecdotal evidence it is true. I saw it in Alaska, Missouri, and West Kansas in just my recent travels.

155 formercorpsman  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:49:33pm

re: #151 el_raton

I have no doubts at all, this could be played that way.

My bigger problem is we have nobody in the party stepping up, and taking the lead to direct the attention to more serious matters.

156 iLikeCandy  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:49:33pm

re: #144 lefort3

It may be just me but geez, aren’t there more pressing issues with the sitting president and our pathetic congress? Call me crazy but…

I typed, then deleted, a post to that effect. I’d rather not give these sillies any publicity or stoop to answer them. Let them duke it out with the nuts on the other side who think George Bush crashed the planes into the Twin Towers. But then it’s not my blog. I jumped in on the discussion because I thought I had a little nugget to contribute, but I’ll be jumping out about now.

157 Lincolntf  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:50:26pm

re: #143 Walter L. Newton

That would be hilarious.
I have always assumed he was born in Hawaii, and it’s dumb for people to waste time on this issue, but if that ever really happened I would laugh for days.
I assume the Congress/SC would manage to whip together some “extra-Constitutional” measure to make sure he stayed in Office until his term was up. I don’t know how they’d do it, of course, but I think they would find a way.

158 avanti  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:50:35pm

re: #113 iLikeCandy

Please, a moment of sobriety. Liz clearly had no desire to even address this bullshit and she kept trying to steer the conversation to the real issues. She wouldn’t condescend to touch the birthers. It would be like asking Julia Child to endorse a non-dairy whipped topping.

That conservatives would attack Liz Cheney, one of the most hard-headed, clear-eyed, and articulate spokespersons of conservative causes over the nirth certifikat issue, has handed a measure of success to the forces of idiocy.

I agree she did not endorse the nirthers, she just ignored the issue purposely, and missed the chance to clear the air with her opinion. IMHO, she remained silent so as to not offend the loons. BTW, not a uncommon tactic on either side, but she still evaded speaking out, and some will take that as a tacit endorsement.

159 The Shadow Do  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:50:49pm

re: #153 Ojoe

If the Denny’s type voters got together they would be a big group.

I really like the Grand Slam breakfast. Scrambled please.

160 iLikeCandy  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:50:52pm

re: #155 formercorpsman

I have no doubts at all, this could be played that way.

My bigger problem is we have nobody in the party stepping up, and taking the lead to direct the attention to more serious matters.

That’s exactly what Liz Cheney was trying to do.

161 JacksonTn  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:51:30pm

re: #154 Thanos

From my anecdotal evidence it is true. I saw it in Alaska, Missouri, and West Kansas in just my recent travels.

Thanos … I travel also and live in rural area most of the time … I have heard it but not in any any way the majority … look who were the people who originally pushed this … they were not rural voters …

162 albusteve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:51:33pm

re: #124 Sharmuta

NONSENSE! For every fringe loon we try to keep we push away more than one moderate/independent. The fringe is a minority by definition. They hurt us.

yes but they seem unstoppable…it’s one damned issue after another…what is the GOP doing to win middle voters…I asked months ago, where is Steele? and why is he not speaking out?…if the GOP does not need me then the feeling is mutual and they are running out of time…

163 pingjockey  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:51:51pm

re: #143 Walter L. Newton
Holy Shit! Can you say big fucking mess!? What would happen to all the bills he signed, treaties, etc…? One helluva scenario ain’t it?!

164 itellu3times  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:52:08pm

re: #132 keithgabryelski

I’m not sure of all the requirements for doing that (although I am aware of the subject).

My post neglects to mention there is atmospheric disturbances that decrease the effectiveness of any ground base telescope.

Actually, while there are a number of major projects going on, optical interferometry is still beyond the state of the art. But there are plans (dreams!) of setting up two satellites many kilometers apart, and making one image out of their small mirrors! Let you read the newspaper headlines on Neptune.

Active optics with laser guides help with that atmospheric disturbance, assuming weather is good and you’re above 8,000 feet or so anyway, like pretty much all new ground-based observatories.

Modern astronomy is amazing, even with what you can do with homebrew stuff for about $10,000. If they ever do get the OI stuff going, watch out!

165 Ojoe  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:52:18pm

re: #159 The Shadow Do

Mmmm short stack for me with maple (?) syrup.

166 formercorpsman  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:52:30pm

re: #160 iLikeCandy

Fair enough, I did not click the link to that story. My thrust was directed at the representative noted in the post, and that no other elected official is taking the ball.

167 iLikeCandy  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:52:55pm

re: #158 avanti

I agree she did not endorse the nirthers, she just ignored the issue purposely, and missed the chance to clear the air with her opinion. IMHO, she remained silent so as to not offend the loons. BTW, not a uncommon tactic on either side, but she still evaded speaking out, and some will take that as a tacit endorsement.

Well, we’ll have to disagree on this one. I think “ignoring” and “missing” and “remaining silent” on the birthers is exactly the right thing to do. Even acknowledging them is lending them more substance than they deserve.

168 HoosierHoops  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:53:09pm

re: #153 Ojoe

If the Denny’s type voters got together they would be a big group.

If you had any idea how many nights we hung out at the Denny’s in Napa growing up..Thousands of Cup of coffees and millions of laughs..Every Black Friday we go to the Denny’s here with friends at 4am before shopping…
I have fond memories of Denny’s

169 steve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:54:27pm

re: #143 Walter L. Newton

I have a question. What would you do if these nirthers actually prove their point? Prove it with no wiggle room for any other conclusion. Just play what if with me. What would you do?

Walter, played that ‘what if’ game with some close friends of mine. The main consensus was that nothing would happen. Congress and the Supreme Court would not do anything in fear of more problems with the main one being ‘who’ would then be president.

170 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:54:53pm

re: #163 pingjockey

Holy Shit! Can you say big fucking mess!? What would happen to all the bills he signed, treaties, etc…? One helluva scenario ain’t it?!

I’m not even suggesting it could happen. But, the only reason I bring it up is because I’m not really keeping up with either side of the issue, even though it has been a repeated subject discussed here. My contribution to the whole thing has been very small.

So, I don’t know better, I really don’t (and I don’t care to, for what ever reason, it feels like a waste of my time).

Since I don’t know better, that also leaves me open to ask the question “what if it turns out to be true.”

Makes you wonder.

171 Ojoe  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:54:58pm

re: #168 HoosierHoops

4am

Nothing like an early start! Love it!

172 Randall Gross  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:55:09pm

re: #161 JacksonTn

Thanos … I travel also and live in rural area most of the time … I have heard it but not in any any way the majority … look who were the people who originally pushed this … they were not rural voters …

Nobody said it was a majority — that’s what’s so damned frustrating about all this. Here you have two R’s in office catering to a small coterie of crazies.

173 realwest  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:56:10pm

re: #147 Cheechako
What’s the betting that TONIGHT - if he answers any questions, someone will ask him , if this bill is SO GOOD, why aren’t the President and the Members of Congress obliged to be on it?And what are the odds that he won’t answer that question again?
What are the odds of anyone asking him if it’s true that the elderly may not get cancer care or will have to attend “counseling” about end of life issues, including killing themselves?
What are the odds of anyone asking him why there are so many placecards in the Cap and Trade Bill and having him answer it? What are the odds of anyone asking him why Nucleur Energy isn’t FRONT AND CENTER in our quest to do away with fossil fuels?
Oh, sorry for the OT here, we now return you to your regularly scheduled programming about Birthers.

174 SixDegrees  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:56:11pm

re: #15 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

How exactly do they think this is going to help them? They’re going to end up losing more people to this insanity than they would have by telling the nirther’s to take a hike. There are other ways to attack Obama than to sign on to this lunacy.

It’s not about 0bama - it’s about them. The nirthers are garden-variety conspiracy theorists, all of whom share a trait in common: they latch onto their theory because it draw attention to them, and they desperately crave that attention. That’s the main reason the conspiracy keeps expanding indefinitely - as each incarnation of it is proven ridiculous, the scope is widened to “explain” the inconvenient truth and keep the conspiracy going. Because accepting a rational explanation for it would diminish the theorist’s importance, as there would be no reason for anyone to pay attention to them anymore.

The fact that the attention they get is almost entirely negative doesn’t matter; it’s still attention. You’ll notice that they actively seek out confrontation - when things start to die down, they’re the ones constantly making a scene, grabbing a microphone or assaulting a television camera.

In short, it’s a mental illness, a personality disorder that can range from moderate to severe, and that is probably treatable with a huge heap of therapy. Unless therapists are part of the conspiracy, and not surprisingly they are often incorporated into the web of imagined deceit and subterfuge created by the theorists to explain away anyone or anything that threatens to take their crutch away.

175 Erik The Red  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:56:20pm

44 is on in a few moments. Is anyone going to watch? I will be good for about 10 minutes before my head starts to ache.

176 avanti  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:56:43pm

re: #167 iLikeCandy

Well, we’ll have to disagree on this one. I think “ignoring” and “missing” and “remaining silent” on the birthers is exactly the right thing to do. Even acknowledging them is lending them more substance than they deserve.

She could have simply said: “Obama is clearly a citizen of the US, but and we have real issues that need to be dealt with, and his citizenship is not one of them.”

177 placeholder  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:56:46pm

re: #124 Sharmuta

NONSENSE! For every fringe loon we try to keep we push away more than one moderate/independent. The fringe is a minority by definition. They hurt us.

totally agreed. these guys were never going to vote for obama…ever. just like ultra left KOS voters will never ever vote against him - it contradicts the core essence of how they see themselves. why pander to them? where will they go exactly??

178 albusteve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:57:10pm

so worst case scenario…the GOP wins back the govt on the backs of lunatic voters…if they are no threat or a small minority what’s the problem?…if they are a major influence and win back govt then again what’s the problem and why are we even talking about this…how influential are the lunatics?…are they driving away more voters than they are in their own numbers?…I don’t think anyone knows

179 Ojoe  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:57:20pm

re: #175 Erik The Red

Not watching.

180 avanti  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:57:26pm

re: #175 Erik The Red

44 is on in a few moments. Is anyone going to watch? I will be good for about 10 minutes before my head starts to ache.

Drinking game ? I have beer.

181 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:57:36pm

re: #176 avanti

She could have simply said: “Obama is clearly a citizen of the US, but and we have real issues that need to be dealt with, and his citizenship is not one of them.”

I’ll ask you this question too…

What would you do if these nirthers actually prove their point? Prove it with no wiggle room for any other conclusion. Just play what if with me. What would you do?

182 Lincolntf  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:57:46pm

After bracing myself all day for Obama’s newest blab-athon, I just found out that the Red Sox are on ESPN at the same time. Sweet!
Sorry, Barry, tonight you’ll only get to lie to me during commercial breaks and pitching changes.

183 keithgabryelski  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:59:26pm

re: #158 avanti

I agree she did not endorse the nirthers, she just ignored the issue purposely, and missed the chance to clear the air with her opinion. IMHO, she remained silent so as to not offend the loons. BTW, not a uncommon tactic on either side, but she still evaded speaking out, and some will take that as a tacit endorsement.

She did more than that. She attempted to excuse birther behavior by claiming a larger “concern” among citizens.

184 avanti  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:59:51pm

re: #181 Walter L. Newton

I’ll ask you this question too…

What would you do if these nirthers actually prove their point? Prove it with no wiggle room for any other conclusion. Just play what if with me. What would you do?

I’d be in shock at first, depressed later.

185 pingjockey  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 4:59:54pm

re: #169 steve
Congress and SCOTUS casnnot overrule the Constitution as it is wriiten. Rules of eligibility and succession are clearly defined. They can’t blow it off.

186 The Shadow Do  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:00:10pm

re: #162 albusteve

yes but they seem unstoppable…it’s one damned issue after another…what is the GOP doing to win middle voters…I asked months ago, where is Steele? and why is he not speaking out?…if the GOP does not need me then the feeling is mutual and they are running out of time…

Steele is an executive charged with fundraising and campaign management national oversight. He is not the party spokesman. That position remains open. Someone in Congress needs to set the pace/agenda a la Newt back in the day for 2010, but there is no one in sight. If you see a congressman with a bit of charisma who is not a nut case please direct me to him/her and good times probably follow.
Presidential candidates cannot realistically present themselves until 2011.
Leadership void for sure, but it isn’t because of Steele.

187 realwest  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:00:29pm

re: #182 Lincolntf
Hi there neighbor! Uh, who is in first place in the American League East?
Geez, I haven’t checked the standings in probably half an hour and I don’t remember.
:)

188 Flyers1974  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:00:44pm

re: #143 Walter L. Newton

I have a question. What would you do if these nirthers actually prove their point? Prove it with no wiggle room for any other conclusion. Just play what if with me. What would you do?

I’d leave this blog and never discuss politics with anyone ever again. And I’d devote my spare time towards a nice peaceful hobby like pottery-making or crafting necklaces out of colored beads.

189 pingjockey  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:01:04pm

re: #170 Walter L. Newton
It does. Like I said one helluva scenario!

190 HoosierHoops  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:01:08pm

re: #171 Ojoe

4am

Nothing like an early start! Love it!

I always enjoyed the Denny’s by the San Diego Airport..Always eat there before dropping off the rental car..My wife always flirts with the gay servers…
‘Your hair looks Fabulous!’ Who did it?
We’d always have a friend for 45 minutes…Just chatting it up…Good times at Denny’s..you take what you can get..

191 wahabicorridor  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:01:22pm

So, are we going to have a thread on the O’s sermon from the mount?

192 avanti  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:01:39pm

re: #183 keithgabryelski

She did more than that. She attempted to excuse birther behavior by claiming a larger “concern” among citizens.

Not sure if she was excusing it, maybe trying to rationalize irrational behavior, but she sure left it open to interpretation.

193 VegasRick  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:01:52pm

Here we go. Let the lies, bigger lies and fucking lies start!

194 pianobuff  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:01:55pm

re: #143 Walter L. Newton

I have a question. What would you do if these nirthers actually prove their point? Prove it with no wiggle room for any other conclusion. Just play what if with me. What would you do?

I’d have to get a 2nd job to pay off bets. :(

195 SixDegrees  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:02:11pm

re: #173 realwest

What’s the betting that TONIGHT - if he answers any questions, someone will ask him , if this bill is SO GOOD, why aren’t the President and the Members of Congress obliged to be on it?And what are the odds that he won’t answer that question again?
What are the odds of anyone asking him if it’s true that the elderly may not get cancer care or will have to attend “counseling” about end of life issues, including killing themselves?
What are the odds of anyone asking him why there are so many placecards in the Cap and Trade Bill and having him answer it? What are the odds of anyone asking him why Nucleur Energy isn’t FRONT AND CENTER in our quest to do away with fossil fuels?
Oh, sorry for the OT here, we now return you to your regularly scheduled programming about Birthers.

Another important question that needs asking: why is it so important to pass this bill in a rush, before the details of what it contains become known?

And another: if this bill is so good and so beneficial to Americans, why aren’t you promoting it’s benefits and details, and instead spend your time accusing it’s critics of “playing politics” or using “scare tactics” when a simply discussion of what the bill actually contains should answer those critics directly?

196 pingjockey  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:02:23pm

re: #187 realwest
You are a stinker! You know who is in first!

197 VegasRick  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:02:26pm

Bush’s fault!

198 HoosierHoops  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:02:32pm

Baby Jesus is on TV

199 wahabicorridor  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:02:35pm

DRINK!

200 Tarkus289  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:02:41pm

He is using a center teleprompter.

201 Idle Drifter  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:02:44pm

Nirthers, Troofers, Moonbats, Kooks, Crazies, (Insert your favorite here).

Never underestimate the ___?___ in large groups.

I left it blank …?… because there are too many words that could be placed here.

202 Erik The Red  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:02:46pm

BULLSHIT. The economy is still bleeding.

203 Lincolntf  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:02:50pm

re: #185 pingjockey

Who would remove him from Office? If it ever came to that (even if it’s a slam-dunk) I’m guessing he and his allies in both Houses of Congress would tie it up in Court until the end of his term.

204 Targetpractice  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:03:03pm

re: #174 SixDegrees

All very much true.

205 Killian Bundy  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:03:12pm

re: #202 Erik The Red

BULLSHIT. The economy is still bleeding.

/pass the ham, we paid for it

206 Lincolntf  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:03:12pm

re: #187 realwest

Ask me tomorrow.

207 wahabicorridor  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:03:18pm

“As a result of the actions we took, we were able to pull the economy back from the bink”

208 pingjockey  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:03:22pm

Hah! First sentence, inherited mess.

209 iLikeCandy  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:03:27pm

re: #176 avanti

She could have simply said: “Obama is clearly a citizen of the US, but and we have real issues that need to be dealt with, and his citizenship is not one of them.”

There are a million things she could have said. Crushing the birther movement is not one of her priorities. She addressed her priorities.

I repeat: when we’re at the point where we accuse Liz Cheney of pandering to wackos is, we have handed wackoism itself a measure of victory.

210 samk  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:03:30pm

I find it funny that Obama is pre-empting Wipeout.

211 realwest  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:03:38pm

re: #191 wahabicorridor
I’d bet not; I don’t think Charles would put up a thread about yet another Prime Time Newscast about Obama - and largely, of course, by Obama when so few of us would be watching it.

212 Randall Gross  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:03:50pm

re: #174 SixDegrees

There’s also a huge media mill feeding this hysteria for hits as well : World Nut Daily, Alex Jones, and others.

213 [deleted]  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:04:01pm
214 Abu Bin Squid  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:04:10pm

Barry’s on!
Blame Bush 30 sec.

Blame the rich 1:00

What a prick!

215 albusteve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:04:15pm

re: #186 The Shadow Do

Steele is an executive charged with fundraising and campaign management national oversight. He is not the party spokesman. That position remains open. Someone in Congress needs to set the pace/agenda a la Newt back in the day for 2010, but there is no one in sight. If you see a congressman with a bit of charisma who is not a nut case please direct me to him/her and good times probably follow.
Presidential candidates cannot realistically present themselves until 2011.
Leadership void for sure, but it isn’t because of Steele.

you were there through that whole debate back then…if he does not speak out then he should put some pressure on someone else to speak out…I know what his role is…and if the lunatics are a fringe then who cares?…if the logic is that they influence other voters then they are not fringe imo…if nobody will deal with them then they are a major voting block right?…if not then what’s the big deal…which way is it?

216 avanti  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:04:23pm

47 million uninsured, DRINK

217 pingjockey  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:04:36pm

re: #203 Lincolntf
I don’t know how it works. But the constitution is very damn clear.

218 Abu Bin Squid  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:05:11pm

Strawman’s down! Strawman’s down!

219 realwest  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:05:31pm

re: #206 Lincolntf
Unless the Bosox are playing a double header tonight (no, I honestly don’t know if they are) and win both games, then the same team that’s currently in first place!

220 pingjockey  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:05:34pm

going up folks

221 albusteve  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:05:34pm

re: #212 Thanos

There’s also a huge media mill feeding this hysteria for hits as well : World Nut Daily, Alex Jones, and others.

yes, another whole aspect to the mess

222 Lee Coller  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:05:40pm

Matthews evicerated him. However, I think his comparison to FDR’s four terms and the constitutional amendment that resulted is a stretch.

223 [deleted]  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:05:43pm
224 [deleted]  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:07:10pm
225 realwest  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:07:15pm

re: #211 realwest
Shit, sorry {wahabi} I was wrong about that!
Hope you all have a good evening - I’m gonna go eat dinner and watch HGTV.
Or maybe Science Channel, NatGeo or the Military Channel.

226 Lincolntf  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:08:01pm

re: #219 realwest

Crap. I thought we were only back by one. We’ve got a bit of the doldrums right now, but I’m sure both of our teams will be in the playoffs when it’s all said and done.

227 jacksontn  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:08:37pm

re: #224 taxfreekiller

My illegal wage slave voters.
You pay for their health care.

Oh, by the way, do not like it, I won, fu*K you.

SIGNED
B. OBAMA

tfk … who gets the care? … your old parents … or the young illegals? … who decides? … ugly scenario …

228 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:09:01pm

re: #115 iLikeCandy

NO! Read the article. The title is bullshit.

The title is not bullshit. Liz Cheney was given a chance to denounce that insanity, and she weaseled out of it, more than once. She was pandering to the nuts. You can deny it if you like, but it was dead obvious.

229 notamolly  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:09:06pm

re: #225 realwest

Shit, sorry {wahabi} I was wrong about that!
Hope you all have a good evening - I’m gonna go eat dinner and watch HGTV.
Or maybe Science Channel, NatGeo or the Military Channel.

Dog the Bounty Hunter on A&E or Food Network. Decisions decisions…

230 Lincolntf  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:10:09pm

re: #217 pingjockey

True, it’s clear. But it has also been circumvented in extraordinary circumstances (Lincoln, FDR, etc.) before.
No matter how hard I try I just can’t picture him doing the walk of shame out of the White House.

231 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:13:28pm

re: #113 iLikeCandy

Please, a moment of sobriety. Liz clearly had no desire to even address this bullshit and she kept trying to steer the conversation to the real issues. She wouldn’t condescend to touch the birthers. It would be like asking Julia Child to endorse a non-dairy whipped topping.

That conservatives would attack Liz Cheney, one of the most hard-headed, clear-eyed, and articulate spokespersons of conservative causes over the nirth certifikat issue, has handed a measure of success to the forces of idiocy.

No — what hands success to the forces of idiocy is when people like Liz Cheney refuse to speak out against the idiocy. And people who advocate ignoring this stuff, or just accepting the kooks because we “need” them, are deluding themselves.

232 dwells38  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:13:31pm

re: #169 steve

And I don’t think we who did not vote for him want this technicality to make him leave office. It would only make him a martyr. He’s already made several mistakes not the least of letting the Dems punk him into pushing a pork bill as stimulus. With no stimulus in the works and unemployment running rampant the country’s in no mood to give him lots of slack to learn on the job. The 2010 elections are coming up and the tables are starting to turn. He and the other Dems have way over reached and audaciously so during a time of economic hardship. I would rather see them legitimately defeated.

Remember how much sympathy Clinton received when they impeached him on the technicality that he lied under oath about boinking the intern?

233 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:14:03pm

re: #156 iLikeCandy

I typed, then deleted, a post to that effect. I’d rather not give these sillies any publicity or stoop to answer them. Let them duke it out with the nuts on the other side who think George Bush crashed the planes into the Twin Towers. But then it’s not my blog.

That’s true, it’s not.

234 Flyers1974  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:14:43pm

re: #230 Lincolntf

I think the SC would refuse to hear the case. But if they did boot him out, who would take over?

235 Macker  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:16:19pm

There’s plenty of other ammo with which to criticize БХО. That said…what if there really IS something to this story?

236 Flyers1974  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:17:02pm

re: #235 Macker

There’s plenty of other ammo with which to criticize БХО. That said…what if there really IS something to this story?

Are you serious?

237 keithgabryelski  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:18:13pm

re: #235 Macker

There’s plenty of other ammo with which to criticize БХО. That said…what if there really IS something to this story?

what are you talking about? There is NOTHING to this story. President Obama released his birth certificate.

He is a natural born citizen of the USA.

end. of. discussion.

238 el_raton  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:18:14pm

Asking, “What if there is something to this?” is like asking, “What if the Easter Bunny does exist?”

239 flutesnoot  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:20:18pm

re: #89 HoosierHoops

Yea, we got em.. They were all on leave that week…When you work for the Gov’t there is always that use or lose issue…
/
What part of the world do you hail from lizard?

Canada. I don’t even know if you have to be born in Canada to run for prime minister.

240 Mad Prophet Ludwig  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:34:25pm

So let’s be really clear about what this means.

Obama has a lot of policies and ideas that will be bad for this country and our allies.

Someone should have well wrought logical alternatives to present and argue for. The natural people to do this would be the GOP.

However, in the absence of any actual plans or ideas of their own - other than whining a lot and shouting soundbites - we see open acts of desperation.

We see them pandering to the Creationists more than ever - why because to a creationist, so long as you tag the anti Darwin line, you don’t actually have to have any policies of your own.

We see them pandering to the Nirthers. Why here is another crap flinging group that you don’t need to say anything constructive to. I mean the revolution sounds grand don’t it? Who cares if we have no plans for after…

We see them fuming all over Sotomayor and trying their damned level best to make this into a racially charged bit of scare tactics… Ohhh BOOGA BOOGA, the big bad Latina woman is coming to take your jobs and livelyhoods by making it impossible for white people to compete with affirmative action… BOOOGA BOOGA BE SCARED white Boys be scared…

Uh… Huh… so ok, you have fired a broadside “for the honor of the fleet” in her case… Do you have anything CONSTRUCTIVE to say? Ohhh, no you don’t that would mean actually having ideas that go beyond slinging mud…

We see them pandering to the folksie folks. Why, because so long as you are a cute soccer mom, you don’t need to actually know anything or have any real policies of your own. Hey, she can even run out on her elected office, true believers don’t care about things like actually doing the job you were elected to do… Sorry guys, Palin is forever on my shit list for cutting and running, even if you love her, can you agree that this shows a certain lack of sense of duty?

And who really is running the GOP these days?

What we see all over is a complete paucity of ideas. What we see is desperation. This is just great because, you know, unless someone has some actual ideas that are workable, to counter Obama with, you got bubkas.

And this is a pity. It really is. Because Obama does need to be countered on lots of things. Only the GOP, through only knowing how to cry wolf, and trip over its own feet, has made it so Obama’s real wolves won’t be noticed if someone calls a warning.

Great show losers. You deserved to be tossed out of office. After your party splits inot an isolationist party and a Religious party, you will be gladly replaced by something new and more sensible.

241 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 5:38:02pm

re: #235 Macker

There’s plenty of other ammo with which to criticize БХО. That said…what if there really IS something to this story?

*Facepalm*

242 nonic  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 6:16:09pm

The federal bill would require that IN THE FUTURE candidates would have to provide proofs of the qualifications required by the Constitution.

As a matter of fact, I read some months ago that several (or many or most) state boards of election have already, without fanfare, written that requirement into their rules for FUTURE ballots.

What’s wrong with that? Most people have to show proof of qualifications when they apply for a job.

243 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 6:20:55pm

re: #242 nonic

The federal bill would require that IN THE FUTURE candidates would have to provide proofs of the qualifications required by the Constitution.

As a matter of fact, I read some months ago that several (or many or most) state boards of election have already, without fanfare, written that requirement into their rules for FUTURE ballots.

What’s wrong with that? Most people have to show proof of qualifications when they apply for a job.

This federal bill would not even exist if it weren’t for the Nirthers. It is pandering to the conspiracy nuts, very deliberately, for political purposes. That’s what’s wrong with it.

244 Mad Prophet Ludwig  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 6:24:06pm

re: #243 Charles

There is also the issue that a congressman mentioned an Army major who refused to serve… Great soundbite right? I mean we love the military and if one of our heros is a Nirther then this must be a real issue…

Hmmm…

A CONGRESSMAN FROM THE PARTY THAT IS SUPPOSED TO SUPPORT THE MILITARY JUST SANCTIONED MUTINY, BECAUSE IT WOULD MAKE A GOOD SOUNDBITE.

I am an independent for a reason.

245 Mich-again  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 6:24:13pm

re: #242 nonic

The federal bill would require that IN THE FUTURE candidates would have to provide proofs of the qualifications required by the Constitution.

Little League Baseball requires an official sealed birth certificate to verify the player’s birthdate, and not just a photocopy.

246 Mich-again  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 6:28:53pm

re: #243 Charles

This federal bill would not even exist if it weren’t for the Nirthers. It is pandering to the conspiracy nuts, very deliberately, for political purposes. That’s what’s wrong with it.

Agreed.

247 nonic  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 6:39:42pm

re: #243 Charles

It’s pretty common that laws are not written until there occurs some event or condition that demonstrates that there is a new need for a new law. I can immediately think of things like needle exchange programs or no-questions-asked baby drop-offs or identify theft preventatives.

In fact, if a proof-of-qualifications law had been put into place years or decades or a couple of centuries ago — if it had been thought to be needed then — there would be none of this current hullaballoo over the current president. Or would have been, as there was, over John McCain.

This federal bill intends to prevent FUTURE problems.

There is a doctrine in the law called “subsequent remedial measures” which holds that if you trip over something or slip on something and AFTER your fall, the property owner modifies or marks the item involved, you CANNOT cite the owner’s action as proof of their previous negligence.

In other words, somebody’s trying to improve something cannot be held against them.

This seems very similar to me. There is a situation here that needs to be fixed. Fixing it need have NOTHING to do with any current claims.

We’d never have any progress in the law or anything else if all intended improvements were held to be “political” and for that reason alone suspect and undesirable.

248 nonic  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 6:59:25pm

re: #244 LudwigVanQuixote

There was no “mutiny” involved. The called-up major applied for conscientious objector status based on his concern that should anything irregular be found in the legal ability of the Commander in Chief to perform that function under the Constitution, international treaties, or international law, he (the major) might be vulnerable to being charged with war crimes.

249 placeholder  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 7:01:43pm

re: #247 nonic

This seems very similar to me. There is a situation here that needs to be fixed. Fixing it need have NOTHING to do with any current claims.

There is no problem that needs to be fixed - there is already a constitutional requirement for chrissakes. This bill is just a redundancy that is specifically designed to lend oblique credibility to a bunch of dipshits.

This is a bad precedent.

250 placeholder  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 7:02:08pm

re: #248 nonic

There was no “mutiny” involved. The called-up major applied for conscientious objector status based on his concern that should anything irregular be found in the legal ability of the Commander in Chief to perform that function under the Constitution, international treaties, or international law, he (the major) might be vulnerable to being charged with war crimes.

give me a break. utter bullshit.

251 nonic  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 7:12:49pm

re: #249 placeholder

Yes, there is a Constitutional requirement. THAT’S THE POINT. But a Constitutional requirement is not the same thing as an “enabling law”. Which is why the later Amendments have wording that authorizes the Congress and/or executive to enforce the content of the Amendment.

Anyway. If there’s any “redundancy,” it’s that many (maybe eventually most or all) state boards of election are including requirements for proof of qualifications when a potential candidate applies to have his/her name placed on a ballot in the future.

252 jvic  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 7:19:51pm

re: #247 nonic

…This federal bill intends to prevent FUTURE problems…

A few days ago, I speculated that the “future problem” is Obama’s reelection. Matthews has come to the same conclusion.

Might the Republicans actually manage to lose seats in 2010?

253 nonic  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 7:30:33pm

re: #252 jvic

A few days ago, I speculated that the “future problem” is Obama’s reelection.

That could conceivably be an issue. But, first, it assumes that he will run again. It’s too soon to know that.

But it would also be possible for the law, should it be enacted, to exempt current office holders.

Might the Republicans actually manage to lose seats in 2010?

Anything is possible. The world seems a very volatile place right now. A lot could happen internationally that could greatly color the domestic and internal affairs of the US.

254 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 8:40:32pm

re: #81 placeholder

The only way they will be convinced is if we send them to the moon to see it for themselves.

Can we please just leave them there? The moon would seem to be a natural habitat for barking nirther moonbats.

255 Karridine  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 8:48:43pm

I want to shut down a birth-certificate-for-Obama acquaintance once and for all, but I can’t Google up the link for Obama’s long-form birth certificate…

Wasn’t that link posted here (LGF) earlier?

What’s a link (where’s a link) to Obama’s long-form birth certificate, please…

256 Irenicum  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 8:56:34pm

Here ya go. But remember, they’re part of the all encompassing “conspiracy”.
///

257 Karridine  Wed, Jul 22, 2009 10:14:29pm

re: #256 Irenicum

Thanks, Irenicum! This MIGHT provide surcease, but I won’t hold my breath… :D

258 Dr. Shalit  Thu, Jul 23, 2009 5:38:24am

re: #255 Karridine

I want to shut down a birth-certificate-for-Obama acquaintance once and for all, but I can’t Google up the link for Obama’s long-form birth certificate…

Wasn’t that link posted here (LGF) earlier?

What’s a link (where’s a link) to Obama’s long-form birth certificate, please…

Karridine -

Bottom line is this. Pres. Obama’s Mother was an American Citizen, case closed as far as I am concerned unless he renounced his citizenship upon reaching majority. There are plenty of other reasons I would Prefer he were not President. This one is a waste of time.

-S-

259 scrubjay  Thu, Jul 23, 2009 10:09:59am

There should be some formal process that a candidate for president must follow to prove that he meets the constitutional requirements for office. I had to show my birth certificate when i applied for my passport and also for my driver’s license. I don’t understand why Obama doesn’t just say “This nonsense has gone on long enough. Here is my birth certificate. Now let’s get back to issues.”

260 aRedPhishHead  Thu, Jul 23, 2009 11:53:40am

I spent the morning and part of the afternoon arguing (as Good Lt) with Birthers in this lengthy, heated Hot Air thread.

This cancer is spreading and it isn’t encouraging. Sigh.

261 velsin  Thu, Jul 23, 2009 12:23:21pm

As a former resident of a communist country, and now current citizen of the USA, I am sincerely concerned that people are calling their fellow citizens mentally ill for asking questions that raise real constitutional issues with respect to the presidency. I did not leave a totalitarian state where questioning authority could lead to being branded an “crazy person” who was sent to a gulag, only to receive a similar reception here. Whether or not President Obama’s birth certificate is authentic is not the issue, the issues is the lack of respect that legitimate questions are treated with by an ignorant and supine press.

262 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 23, 2009 1:15:31pm

re: #261 velsin

As a former resident of a communist country, and now current citizen of the USA, I am sincerely concerned that people are calling their fellow citizens mentally ill for asking questions that raise real constitutional issues with respect to the presidency. I did not leave a totalitarian state where questioning authority could lead to being branded an “crazy person” who was sent to a gulag, only to receive a similar reception here. Whether or not President Obama’s birth certificate is authentic is not the issue, the issues is the lack of respect that legitimate questions are treated with by an ignorant and supine press.

As soon as Obama’s fucking birth certificate was posted on the internet, the Hawaiian newspaper birth announcements were dredged up, and the Republican in charge of health and hospital issues in Hawaii affirmed that she had gone and seen the original, the questions BECAME illegitimate.

263 Hawaii69  Thu, Jul 23, 2009 4:47:44pm

re: #248 nonic

There was no “mutiny” involved. The called-up major applied for conscientious objector status based on his concern that should anything irregular be found in the legal ability of the Commander in Chief to perform that function under the Constitution, international treaties, or international law, he (the major) might be vulnerable to being charged with war crimes.

The Major wasn’t “called up”. He volunteered for a tour of duty in Afghanistan back in May ‘09. He’s a Reservist.

Interesting thing: He wrote a letter to Orly Taitz, The Birther “lawyer” back in February ‘09, stating that he was a military officer with doubts about Obama’s legitimacy as Commander in Chief, and asking to join her lawsuit against him.

If this was the case, why did hevolunteer for duty only 3 months later? Simple answer: It was a set-up from the beginning. When his orders came through in June ‘09, telling him to report for duty on July 15th, he had Orly Taitz file a restraining order against the military.

This is interesting because, as a volunteer, he was under NO obligation to go to Afghanistan. If he wanted out, all he had to do was file the appropriate paperwork with the Army, and they would have rescinded his orders. According to the Army, he never filed to have the orders rescinded.

Instead, he had Taitz file the restraining order, as to give the appearance that he were being forced on a deployment by a President he considered to be illegetimate. What better way to publicize the Birther cause? This was charade, in the planning since Feb. 09.

The military finally got tired of these antics and rescinded his orders shortly before he was scheduled to deply on July 15. His Orly Taitz then stepped forward and declared a “victory” for soldiers who question Obama’s legitimacy, and claimed that the Major Cook’s orders were revoked as a way to silence him, and avoid having to produce Obama’s Birth Certificate.

That’s my long winded way of saying “The whole thing was complete bullshit”.

264 nonic  Thu, Jul 23, 2009 7:00:35pm

re: #263 Hawaii69

Assuming the facts are as you state them —- and I will allow that they may be, since I haven’t followed this story closely —- and assuming the situation was a “set up” (what is known as a “test case”), that doesn’t change the legal argument put forward, i.e., that military service under a Commander in Chief who may be holding office illegitmately puts service men and women at risk.

(Tailored test cases are not unusual. Research it and you’ll find that Roe v. Wade was just such a “set up.”)

Can’t you imagine a foreign enemy trying to prosecute our service men and women on THEIR claim (the enemy’s claim) that OUR president was not qualified to hold office?

Which is all the more reason that we should have laws in place foreclosing any such possibility, as well as assuring the public generally and insuring that the legitimacy of what the government does cannot be questioned.

265 Charles Johnson  Thu, Jul 23, 2009 8:42:29pm

re: #261 velsin

As a former resident of a communist country, and now current citizen of the USA, I am sincerely concerned that people are calling their fellow citizens mentally ill for asking questions that raise real constitutional issues with respect to the presidency. I did not leave a totalitarian state where questioning authority could lead to being branded an “crazy person” who was sent to a gulag, only to receive a similar reception here. Whether or not President Obama’s birth certificate is authentic is not the issue, the issues is the lack of respect that legitimate questions are treated with by an ignorant and supine press.

These “questions” deserve NO respect. They’ve been answered, over and over. This conspiracy theory is insane, and anyone who continues to rant about it should be treated exactly like a lunatic on a street corner.

266 dapperdave  Thu, Jul 23, 2009 8:55:27pm

What if b.o. wasn’t born in this country what are the nirthers going to do impeach him? Then what? Biden? This to me looks like nothing more than desperation, grasping for straws, 2010 is around the corner b.o. doing a fine job at hanging himself we’ll see how the election turns out in 2010


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh